Skip to main content
×
Home
Relevant Logic
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 39
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Baron, Sam 2016. Explaining Mathematical Explanation. The Philosophical Quarterly, Vol. 66, Issue. 264, p. 458.


    Onishi, Takuro 2016. Understanding Negation Implicationally in the Relevant Logic R. Studia Logica,


    Roy, Olivier and Hjortland, Ole Thomassen 2016. Special issue on substructural logic and information dynamics: introduction. Journal of Logic and Computation, p. exv017.


    Weber, Zach Badia, Guillermo and Girard, Patrick 2016. What Is an Inconsistent Truth Table?. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, Vol. 94, Issue. 3, p. 533.


    Allo, Patrick 2015. Donald W. Loveland, Richard E. Hodel, and S. G. Sterrett: Three Views of Logic: Mathematics, Philosophy and Computer Science. Minds and Machines, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 291.


    Beall, Jc 2015. Free of Detachment: Logic, Rationality, and Gluts. Noûs, Vol. 49, Issue. 2, p. 410.


    Bimbó, Katalin 2015. Current Trends in Substructural Logics. Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 44, Issue. 6, p. 609.


    Cheng, Jingde 2015. 2015 IEEE 14th International Conference on Cognitive Informatics & Cognitive Computing (ICCI*CC). p. 175.

    Sedlár, Igor 2015. Substructural epistemic logics. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics, Vol. 25, Issue. 3, p. 256.


    Berto, Francesco 2014. V-On Conceiving the Inconsistent. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback), Vol. 114, Issue. 1pt1, p. 103.


    Mares, Edwin and Paoli, Francesco 2014. Logical Consequence and the Paradoxes. Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 43, Issue. 2-3, p. 439.


    Restall, Greg 2014. Normal Proofs, Cut Free Derivations and Structural Rules. Studia Logica, Vol. 102, Issue. 6, p. 1143.


    Shapiro, Stewart 2014. Structures and Logics: A Case for (a) Relativism. Erkenntnis, Vol. 79, Issue. S2, p. 309.


    Francez, Nissim 2013. Relevant harmony. Journal of Logic and Computation, p. ext026.


    Yang, Eunsuk 2013. R and Relevance Principle Revisited. Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 42, Issue. 5, p. 767.


    Allo, Patrick and Mares, Edwin 2012. Informational Semantics as a Third Alternative?. Erkenntnis, Vol. 77, Issue. 2, p. 167.


    Beall, Jc Brady, Ross Dunn, J. Michael Hazen, A. P. Mares, Edwin Meyer, Robert K. Priest, Graham Restall, Greg Ripley, David Slaney, John and Sylvan, Richard 2012. On the Ternary Relation and Conditionality. Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 41, Issue. 3, p. 595.


    Mares, Edwin 2012. Relevant Logic and the Philosophy of Mathematics. Philosophy Compass, Vol. 7, Issue. 7, p. 481.


    McKubre-Jordens, Maarten and Weber, Zach 2012. Real Analysis in Paraconsistent Logic. Journal of Philosophical Logic, Vol. 41, Issue. 5, p. 901.


    Xu, Yingjin and Wang, Pei 2012. The frame problem, the relevance problem, and a package solution to both. Synthese, Vol. 187, Issue. S1, p. 43.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Relevant Logic
    • Online ISBN: 9780511520006
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511520006
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

This book introduces the reader to relevant logic and provides the subject with a philosophical interpretation. The defining feature of relevant logic is that it forces the premises of an argument to be really used ('relevant') in deriving its conclusion. The logic is placed in the context of possible world semantics and situation semantics, which are then applied to provide an understanding of the various logical particles (especially implication and negation) and natural language conditionals. The book ends by examining various applications of relevant logic and presenting some interesting open problems. It will be of interest to a range of readers including advanced students of logic, philosophical and mathematical logicians, and computer scientists.

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 140 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 49 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 24th March 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.