References
Al-Ghazālī, A. H. M. (11th century [1963]). The incoherence of the philosophers (S. A. Kamali, Trans.). Lahore: Pakistan Philosophical Congress.
Al-Ghazālī, A. H. M. (ca. 1100 [1952]). Deliverance from error. In W. M. Watt (Trans.), The practice and faith of al-Ghazālī (pp. 1–359). London: Allen & Unwin.
Alston, W. P. (1991). Perceiving God. The epistemology of religious experience. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Asiedu, F. B. A. (2001). The limits of Augustine’s Personal Authority: The Hermeneutics of Trust in De utilitate credendi. In Paffenroth, K. & Hughes, K. L. (Eds.), Augustine and liberal education (pp. 124–145). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Augustine, . (5th century CE [1961]). Confessions (R. S. Pine-Coffin, Trans.). London: Penguin.
Augustine, . (5th century [1953]). The usefulness of belief (De utilitate credendi). In Burleigh, J. H. S. (Ed.), Augustine: Earlier writings (pp. 284–323). Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Ballantyne, N., & Coffman, E. (2012). Conciliationism and uniqueness. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 90, 657–670.
Barnett, Z. (in press). Belief dependence: How do the numbers count? Philosophical Studies, 1–23.
Barrett, J. L. (2004). Why would anyone believe in God? Lanham, MD: AltaMita Press.
Barrett, J. L., Richert, R. A., & Driesenga, A. (2001). God’s beliefs versus mother’s: The development of nonhuman agent concepts. Child Development, 72, 50–65.
Benton, M. A. (2016). Expert opinion and second-hand knowledge. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 92, 492–508.
Berger, M. (1998). Rabbinic authority. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bogardus, T. (2013). The problem of contingency for religious belief. Faith and Philosophy, 30, 371–392.
Bourget, D., & Chalmers, D. J. (2014). What do philosophers believe? Philosophical Studies, 170, 465–500.
Calvin, J. (1559 [1960]). Institutes of the Christian religion (F. L. Battles, Trans.). Philadelphia: Westminster Press.
Carel, H., Kidd, I. J., & Pettigrew, R. (2016). Illness as transformative experience. The Lancet, 388(10050), 1152–1153.
Christensen, D. (2007). Epistemology of disagreement: The good news. Philosophical Review, 116(2), 187–217.
Christensen, D. (2010). Higher-order evidence. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 81(1), 185–215.
Christensen, D. (2011). Disagreement, question-begging, and epistemic self-criticism. Philosopher’s Imprint, 11(6), 1–22.
Clark, K. J., & Barrett, J. L. (2010). Reformed epistemology and the cognitive science of religion. Faith and Philosophy, 27, 174–189.
Cohen, G. A. (2000). If you’re an egalitarian, how come you’re so rich? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Collins, H., & Evans, R. (2008). Rethinking expertise. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Cummins, R. (1998). Reflections on reflective equilibrium. In Ramsey, W. & DePaul, M. (Eds.), The role of intuition in philosophy (pp. 113–127). New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
De Cruz, H. (2018). Religious belief and philosophical views: A qualitative study. Res Philosophica, 95(3), 477–504.
De Cruz, H. (2017). Religious disagreement: An empirical study among academic philosophers. Episteme, 14, 71–87.
De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2015). A natural history of natural theology. The cognitive science of theology and philosophy of religion. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
De Cruz, H., & De Smedt, J. (2013). Reformed and evolutionary epistemology and the noetic effects of sin. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 74(1), 49–66.
Dellsén, F. (2018). When expert disagreement supports the consensus. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 96, 142–156.
Dixon, R. D., Lowery, R. C., & Jones, L. P. (1992). The fact and form of born-again religious conversions and sociopolitical conservatism. Review of Religious Research, 34, 117–131.
Douven, I. (2010). Simulating peer disagreements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science A, 41, 148–157.
Draper, P., & Nichols, R. (2013). Diagnosing cognitive biases in philosophy of religion. The Monist, 96, 420–444.
Easwaran, K., Fenton-Glynn, L., Hitchcock, C., & Velasco, J. D. (2016). Updating on the credences of others: Disagreement, agreement, and synergy. Philosophers’ Imprint, 16(11), 1–39.
Ecklund, E. H., & Scheitle, C. P. (2007). Religion among academic scientists: Distinctions, disciplines, and demographics. Social Problems, 54(2), 289–307.
Edwards, J. (1821). A treatise concerning religious affections, in three parts. Philadelphia: James Crissy.
Elga, A. (2007). Reflection and disagreement. Noûs, 41, 478–502.
Feldman, R. (2007). Reasonable religious disagreements. In Anthony, L. (Ed.), Philosophers without gods (pp. 194–214). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Frank, R. M. (1994). Al-Ghazālī and the Ash‘arite school. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Fricker, L. (2014). Epistemic trust in oneself and others – An argument from analogy? In Callahan, L. & O’Connor, T. (Eds.), Religious faith and intellectual virtue (pp. 174–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fridland, E. (in press). Do as I say and as I do: Imitation, pedagogy and cumulative culture. Mind and Language.
Gauchat, G. (2012). Politicization of science in the public sphere: A study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. American Sociological Review, 77, 167–187.
Gellman, J. (1997). Experience of God and the rationality of theistic belief. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
Gellman, J. (1992). A new look at the problem of evil. Faith and Philosophy, 9(2), 210–216.
Goldman, A. I. (2001). Experts: Which ones should you trust? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63, 85–110.
Goldman, A. I. (2018). Expertise. Topoi, 37, 3–10.
Gould, S. J. (2001). Nonoverlapping magisteria. In Pennock, R. (Ed.), Intelligent design creationism and its critics. Philosophical, theological, and scientific perspectives (pp. 737–749). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Griffel, F. (2005). Taqlīd of the philosophers: al-Ghazālī’s initial accusation in his tahāfut. In Günther, S. (Ed.), Ideas, images, and methods of portrayal: Insights into classical Arabic literature and Islam. Leiden and Boston: Brill.
Griffel, F. (2017). Al-Ghazālī’s Incoherence of the philosophers. In El-Rouayheb, K. & Schmidtke, S. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of Islamic philosophy (pp. 191–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gross, N., & Simmons, S. (2009). The religiosity of American college and university professors. Sociology of Religion, 70, 101–129.
Guthrie, S. E. (1993). Faces in the clouds. A new theory of religion. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gutting, G. (1982). Religious belief and religious skepticism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.
Gutting, G. (2009). What philosophers know: Case studies in recent analytic philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108, 814–834.
Harris, P. L., & Corriveau, K. H. (2011). Young children’s selective trust in informants. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 1179–1187.
Heiphetz, L., Spelke, E. S., Harris, P. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2013). The development of reasoning about beliefs: Fact, preference, and ideology. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 559–565.
Hick, J. (1988). God and the universe of faiths. Essays in the philosophy of religion. London: Macmillan.
Hills, A. (2009). Moral testimony and moral epistemology. Ethics, 120, 94–127.
Hume, D. (1757). The natural history of religion. In Four dissertations (pp. 1–117). London: A. Millar.
James, W. (1902). The varieties of religious experience. A study in human nature. New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.
Janzen, J. (1978). The quest for therapy in Lower Zaire. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children “intuitive theists”? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295–301.
Kelley, J., & De Graaf, N. D. (1997). National context, parental socialization, and religious belief: Results from 15 nations. American Sociological Review, 62, 639–659.
Kelly, T. (2011). Consensus gentium: Reflections on the ‘common consent’ argument for the existence of God. In Clark, K. J. & VanArragon, R. J. (Eds.), Evidence and religious belief (pp. 135–156). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
King, N. L. (2012). Disagreement: What’s the problem? Or a good peer is hard to find. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85, 249–272.
King, P., & Ballantyne, N. (2009). Augustine on testimony. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 39(2), 195–214.
Kitcher, P. (1990). The division of cognitive labor. Journal of Philosophy, 87, 5–22.
Kox, W., Meeus, W., & Hart, H. (1991). Religious conversion of adolescents: Testing the Lofland and Stark model of religious conversion. Sociological Analysis, 52(3), 227–240.
Lackey, J. (2010). What should we do when we disagree? In Gendler, T. & Hawthorne, J. (Eds.), Oxford studies in epistemology (Vol. 3, pp. 274–293). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lackey, J. (2011). Assertion and isolated second-hand knowledge. In Brown, J. & Cappelen, H. (Eds.), Assertion: New philosophical essays (pp. 251–275). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lackey, J. (2018). Experts and peer disagreement. In Benton, M., Hawthorne, J., & Rabinowitz, D. (Eds.), Knowledge, belief, and God: New insights in religious epistemology (pp. 228–245). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lakhdar, M., Vinsonneau, G., Apter, M. J., & Mullet, E. (2007). Conversion to Islam among French adolescents and adults: A systematic inventory of motives. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(1), 1–15.
Lane, J. D., Wellman, H. M., & Gelman, S. A. (2013). Informants’ traits weigh heavily in young children’s trust in testimony and in their epistemic inferences. Child Development, 84, 1253–1268.
Langermann, Y. T. (2000). Maimonides’ repudiation of astrology. In Cohen, R. S. & Levine, H. (Eds.), A Maimonides reader (pp. 131–157). Dordrecht: Springer.
Legare, C. H. (2017). Cumulative cultural learning: Development and diversity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(30), 7877–7883.
Levinstein, B. A. (2015). With all due respect: The macro-epistemology of disagreement. Philosopher’s Imprint, 15(13), 1–20.
Levy, N. (2017). Religious beliefs are factual beliefs: Content does not correlate with context sensitivity. Cognition, 161, 109–116.
Levy, N. (in press). Due deference to denialism: Explaining ordinary people’s rejection of established scientific findings. Synthese, 1–15.
Lindeman, M., Svedholm-Häkkinen, A. M., & Lipsanen, J. (2015). Ontological confusions but not mentalizing abilities predict religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in supernatural purpose. Cognition, 134, 63–76.
Littlejohn, C. (2013). Disagreement and defeat. In Machuca, D. E. (Ed.), Disagreement and skepticism (pp. 169–192). London and New York: Routledge.
Lofland, J., & Stark, R. (1965). Becoming a world-saver: A theory of conversion to a deviant perspective. American Sociological Review, 30, 862–875.
Longino, H. E. (1991). Multiplying subjects and the diffusion of power. Journal of Philosophy, 88, 666–674.
Luhrmann, T. M. (2006). The art of hearing God: Absorption, dissociation, and contemporary American spirituality. Spiritus: A Journal of Christian Spirituality, 5, 133–157.
Luhrmann, T. M. (2012a). A hyperreal God and modern belief. Current Anthropology, 53, 371–395.
Luhrmann, T. M. (2012b). When God talks back. Understanding the American Evangelical relationship with God. New York: Vintage.
Luskin, R. C., O’Flynn, I., Fishkin, J. S., & Russell, D. (2014). Deliberating across deep divides. Political Studies, 62(1), 116–135.
Maimonides, M. (12th century [1963a]). The guide of the perplexed (Vol. 1; S. Pines, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maimonides, M. (12th century [1963b]). The guide of the perplexed (Vol. 2; S. Pines, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Maimonides, M. (12th century [1972]). Letter on astrology. In Twersky, I. (Ed.), A Maimonides reader (pp. 463–473). Springfield, NJ: Behrman House.
Matheson, J. (2009). Conciliatory views of disagreement and higher-order evidence. Episteme, 6(3), 269–279.
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2017). The enigma of reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mill, J. S. (1859). On liberty. London: John W. Parker and Son.
Mill, J. S. (1874). Three essays on religion. London: Henry Holt and Co.
Nagel, J. (2012). Intuitions and experiments: A defense of the case method in epistemology. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 85, 495–527.
Nielsen, M., Mushin, I., Tomaselli, K., & Whiten, A. (2014). Where culture takes hold: “Overimitation” and its flexible deployment in Western, Aboriginal, and Bushmen children. Child Development, 85, 2169–2184.
Norenzayan, A., Gervais, W. M., & Trzesniewski, K. H. (2012). Mentalizing deficits constrain belief in a personal god. PLoS ONE, 7, e36880.
Paloutzian, R. F., Richardson, J. T., & Rambo, L. R. (1999). Religious conversion and personality change. Journal of Personality, 67(6), 1047–1079.
Pasnau, R. (2015). Disagreement and the value of self-trust. Philosophical Studies, 172(9), 2315–2339.
Paul, L. A. (2014). Transformative experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peels, R. (2015). Believing at will is possible. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 93, 524–541.
Pettigrew, R. (2016). Jamesian epistemology formalised: An explication of “the will to believe.” Episteme, 13, 253–268.
Plantinga, A. (2000). Warranted Christian belief. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pollock, J. L. (1987). Defeasible reasoning. Cognitive Science, 11, 481–518.
Potter, K. (2013). Religious disagreement: Internal and external. International Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 74, 21–31.
Pritchard, D. (2008). Knowing the answer, understanding, and epistemic value. Grazer Philosophische Studien, 77(1), 325–339.
Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., & Ross, L. (2002). The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3), 369–381.
Ranney, M. A., & Clark, D. (2016). Climate change conceptual change: Scientific information can transform attitudes. Topics in Cognitive Science, 8(1), 49–75.
Reid, J. (2015). The common consent argument from Herbert to Hume. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 53, 401–433.
Rini, R. (2017). Fake news and partisan epistemology. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 27(2), E43–E64.
Roberts, R. C., & Wood, W. J. (2007). Intellectual virtues: An essay in regulative epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rollins, J. (2015). Beliefs and testimony as social evidence: Epistemic egoism, epistemic universalism, and common consent arguments. Philosophy Compass, 10, 78–90.
Rowe, W. L. (1979). The problem of evil and some varieties of atheism. American Philosophical Quarterly, 16, 335–341.
Schoenfield, M. (2014). Permission to believe: Why permissivism is true and what it tells us about irrelevant influences on belief. Noûs, 48, 193–218.
Schwitzgebel, E. (2014). The moral behavior of ethicists and the role of the philosopher. In Luetge, C., Rusch, H., & Uhl, M. (Eds.), Experimental ethics: Toward an empirical moral philosophy (pp. 59–64). Dordrecht: Springer.
Schwitzgebel, E., & Cushman, F. (2015). Philosophers’ biased judgments persist despite training, expertise and reflection. Cognition, 141, 127–137.
Shea, N. (2009). Imitation as an inheritance system. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364, 2429–2443.
Shtulman, A. (2013). Epistemic similarities between students’ scientific and supernatural beliefs. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 199–212.
Simpson, R. M. (2017). Permissivism and the arbitrariness objection. Episteme, 14(4)519–538.
Smith, J. (1902). History of the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints. Period I: History of Joseph Smith, the prophet, by himself (Vol. 1). Salt Lake City: Deseret News.
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind and Language, 25, 359–393.
Stanford, K. (2006). Exceeding our grasp: Science, history, and the problem of unconceived alternatives. New York: Oxford University Press.
Stroud, S. (2006). Epistemic partiality in friendship. Ethics, 116, 498–524.
Swinburne, R. (2004). The existence of God (6th ed.). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Taves, A. (2016). Revelatory events. Three case studies of the emergence of new spiritual paths. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Van Inwagen, P. (1996). It is wrong, everywhere, always, for anyone, to believe anything upon insufficient evidence. In Jordan, J. & Howard-Snyder, D. (Eds.), Faith, freedom and rationality (pp. 137–154). Savage, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Van Leeuwen, N. (2014). Religious credence is not factual belief. Cognition, 133, 698–715.
Van Leeuwen, N. & van Elk, M. (in press). Seeking the supernatural: The interactive religious experience model. Religion, Brain and Behavior.
Vavova, K. (2018). Irrelevant influences. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 96(1), 134–152.
Wedgwood, R. (2007). The nature of normativity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wettstein, H. (2012). The significance of religious experience. New York: Oxford University Press.
White, R. (2014). Evidence cannot be permissive. In Steup, M., Turri, J., & Sosa, E. (Eds.), Contemporary debates in epistemology (pp. 312–323). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Whiten, A., Allan, G., Devlin, S., Kseib, N., Raw, N., & McGuigan, N. (2016). Social learning in the real-world: ‘Over-imitation’ occurs in both children and adults unaware of participation in an experiment and independently of social interaction. PloS One, 11(7), e0159920.
Wolterstorff, N. (1996). John Locke and the ethics of belief. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Worrall, J. (2004). Science discredits religion. In Peterson, M. L. & VanArragon, R. J. (Eds.), Contemporary debates in philosophy of religion (pp. 59–72). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Zagzebski, L. (2011). Epistemic self-trust and the Consensus Gentium argument. In Clark, K. J. & VanArragon, R. J. (Eds.), Evidence and religious belief (pp. 22–36). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zagzebski, L. (2012). Epistemic authority: A theory of trust, authority, and autonomy in belief. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zuckerman, P. (2007). Atheism. Contemporary numbers and patterns. In Martin, M. (Ed.), The Cambridge companion to atheism (pp. 47–65). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
