Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
Rethinking Asylum
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 29
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Owen, David 2019. Refugees, EU Citizenship and the Common European Asylum System A Normative Dilemma for EU Integration. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice,

    Moen-Larsen, Natalia 2019. Brothers and barbarians: Discursive constructions of ‘refugees’ in Russian media. Acta Sociologica, p. 000169931881759.

    Antonopoulos, Irene 2019. Climate Action. p. 1.

    Kleist, J. Olaf 2018. Was ist ein Migrationsregime? What Is a Migration Regime?. p. 167.

    Gibney, Matthew J. 2018. The ethics of refugees. Philosophy Compass, Vol. 13, Issue. 10, p. e12521.

    Bauböck, Rainer 2018. Refugee Protection and Burden-Sharing in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 56, Issue. 1, p. 141.

    Song, Sarah 2018. Political Theories of Migration. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol. 21, Issue. 1, p. 385.

    Duhaime, Bernard and Thibault, Andréanne 2017. Protection of migrants from enforced disappearance: A human rights perspective. International Review of the Red Cross, Vol. 99, Issue. 905, p. 569.

    McNevin, Anne 2017. Learning to live with irregular migration: towards a more ambitious debate on the politics of ‘the problem’. Citizenship Studies, Vol. 21, Issue. 3, p. 255.

    Cherem, Max 2016. Refugee Rights: Against Expanding the Definition of a “Refugee” and Unilateral Protection Elsewhere. Journal of Political Philosophy, Vol. 24, Issue. 2, p. 183.

    Gray, Benjamin 2016. Exile, Refuge and the Greek Polis: Between Justice and Humanity. Journal of Refugee Studies, p. few027.

    Bagelman, Jennifer J. 2016. Sanctuary City: A Suspended State. p. 67.

    Lambert, Tom 2016. Hospitality, Protection and Refuge in Early English Law. Journal of Refugee Studies, p. fev035.

    Orchard, Phil 2016. The Dawn of International Refugee Protection: States, Tacit Cooperation and Non-Extradition. Journal of Refugee Studies, p. few014.

    Bagelman, Jennifer J. 2016. Sanctuary City: A Suspended State. p. 13.

    Souter, James 2016. Good international citizenship and special responsibilities to protect refugees. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, Vol. 18, Issue. 4, p. 795.

    Baker, Ria E. 2016. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies. p. 1.

    Bagelman, Jennifer J. 2016. Sanctuary City: A Suspended State. p. 45.

    Puggioni, Raffaela 2016. Rethinking International Protection. p. 1.

    Miller, David 2015. Justice in immigration. European Journal of Political Theory, Vol. 14, Issue. 4, p. 391.

    ×

Book description

Each year, hundreds of thousands of people apply for asylum in Europe, North America, and Australia. Some fear political persecution and genocide; some are escaping civil war or environmental catastrophe; others flee poverty, crime, or domestic violence. Who should qualify for asylum? Traditionally, asylum has been reserved for the targets of government persecution, but many believe that its scope should be widened to protect others exposed to serious harm. Matthew Price argues for retaining asylum's focus on persecution - even as other types of refugee aid are expanded - and offers a framework for deciding what constitutes persecution. Asylum, he argues, not only protects refugees but also expresses political values by condemning states for mistreating those refugees. Price's argument explains not only why asylum remains politically relevant and valuable, but also why states should dismantle many of the barriers they have erected against asylum seekers over the last fifteen years.

Reviews

'Lucidly written and powerfully argued, Rethinking Asylum is an important contribution to the academic and policy debates over asylum law. Price’s approach - to understand a grant of asylum as expressive of political values - both returns to foundational justifications for asylum and provides a basis for cogent analysis of current issues.'

T. Alexander Aleinikoff - Georgetown University Law Center

'A lucid and subtle defense of the traditional view that we should reserve asylum for protection of refugees from political persecution. Whether one accepts Price’s conclusions or not, everyone interested in refugee policy should engage with this thoughtful and fair-minded book.'

Joseph H. Carens - University of Toronto

'The best way to save asylum, argues Matthew Price in Rethinking Asylum, is to roll back the judicial liberalization of recent years. If asylum were open only to those specifically victimized by official agents of rogue states, governments would again offer the deeper remedy of permanent integration and abandon the deterrent measures now undermining access to protection. Price eloquently challenges us to accept that refugee law has gone too far. Even those of us who hold a contrary view will learn from his incisive analysis.'

James C. Hathaway - Melbourne Law School

'Rethinking Asylum offers a fresh, powerful and crisply written perspective on the key challenges of providing asylum. Effortlessly integrating legal scholarship and political theory, Price questions some of the central assumptions behind recent refugee policies. This is a standout work.'

Matthew J. Gibney - University of Oxford

'With its bracing tour of historical and contemporary practices, Rethinking Asylum argues that asylum should be justified, and then crafted, as a political act, not as a humanitarian gesture. Unblinking in the acknowledgment that this conception would foreclose asylum grants sought out of economic desperation, this important analysis also persuasively reopens doors to asylum currently closed by nations fearful of floodgates. Price's political approach could save lives; it surely will generate a better debate over how nations should guard against fraudulent asylum applications while fortifying global repudiations of state-sponsored oppression.'

Martha Minow - Harvard Law School and author of Breaking the Cycles of Hatred: Memory, Law and Repair (2003)

'… the beauty of Price's approach is in its firm logic. … His good style and strong argumentation are convincing …'

Source: Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights

'By offering a sound and coherent analysis of the political nature of asylum, [this book] constitutes a valuable contribution to debates on the roots and purpose of this institution.'

Maria-Teresa Gil-Bazo - Newcastle University

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×
Bibliography
Books and Articles
Ackerman, Bruce, Social Justice in the Liberal State (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980).
Adler, Matthew D., “Expressive Theories of Law: A Skeptical Overview,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 148 (2000), pp. 1363–450.
Aeschylus, , The Suppliants, trans. Burian, Peter (Princeton University Press, 1991).
Aeschylus, , The Oresteia, trans. Fagles, Robert (Princeton University Press, 1984).
Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, “Safe Haven: Pragmatics and Prospects,” Virginia Journal of International Law, 35 (1994), pp. 71–9.
Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, “The Meaning of ‘Persecution’ in U.S. Asylum Law” in Adelman, Howard (ed.), Refugee Policy: Canada and the United States (Toronto: York Lanes Press, 1991), pp. 292–320.
Aleinikoff, T. Alexander, Martin, David A., and Motomura, Hiroshi, Immigration and Citizenship: Process and Policy, 4th edn. (St. Paul, MN: West Group, 1998).
Alexander III, Sydenham B., “A Political Response to Crisis in the Immigration Courts,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 21 (2006), pp. 1–59.
American State Papers: Documents, Legislative and Executive, of the Congress of the United States, vol. 1 (1789–1815) (Washington, DC: Gales and Seaton, 1832).
Anderson, Elizabeth S., Value in Ethics and Economics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).
Anderson, Elizabeth S., and Pildes, Richard H., “Expressive Theories of Law: A General Restatement,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 148 (2000), pp. 1503–72.
Anker, Deborah E., “Refugee Law, Gender, and the Human Rights Paradigm,” Harvard Human Rights Journal, 15 (2002), pp. 133–54.
Anker, Deborah E., “Refugee Status and Violence Against Women in the ‘Domestic’ Sphere: The Non-State Actor Question,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 15 (2001), pp. 391–402.
Anker, Deborah E., and Posner, Michael H., “The Forty Year Crisis: A Legislative History of the Refugee Act of 1980,” San Diego Law Review, 19 (1981), pp. 9–89.
Anker, Deborah E., Fitzpatrick, Joan, and Shacknove, Andrew, “Crisis and Cure: A Reply to Hathaway/Neve and Schuck,” Harvard Human Rights Journal, 11 (1998), pp. 295–310.
Anker, Deborah E., Gilbert, Lauren, and Kelly, Nancy, “Women Whose Governments are Unable or Unwilling to Provide Reasonable Protection from Domestic Violence May Qualify as Refugees under United States Asylum Law,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 11 (1997), pp. 709–45.
Arendt, Hannah, Origins of Totalitarianism (San Diego, CA: Harcourt, Brace, 1973).
Bader-Zaar, Birgitta, “Foreigners and the Law in Austria” in Fahrmeir, Andreaset al. (eds.), Migration Control in the North Atlantic World (New York: Berghahn Books, 2003), pp. 39–54.
Bailliet, Cecilia M., “Assessing Jus ad Bellum and Jus in Bello Within the Refugee Status Determination Process: Contemplations on Conscientious Objectors Seeking Asylum,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 20 (2006), pp. 337–84.
Barry, Brian, and Goodin, Robert, Free Movement (University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1992).
Bassiouni, M. Cherif, International Extradition: United States Law and Practice, 3rd edn. (Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications, 1996).
Bau, Ignatius, This Ground is Holy: Church Sanctuary and Central American Refugees (New York: Paulist Press, 1985).
Beccaria, Cesare, On Crimes and Punishments, trans. Paolucci, Henry (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill, 1963).
Beerbühl, Margrit Schulte, “British Nationality Policy as a Counter-Revolutionary Strategy During the Napoleonic Wars: The Emergence of Modern Naturalization Regulations” in Fahrmeir, Andreaset al. (eds.), Migration Control in the North Atlantic World (New York: Berghahn Books, 2003), pp. 55–72.
Benhabib, Seyla, Transformations of Citizenship (Amsterdam: Koninklijke Van Gorcum, 2001).
Bhabha, Jacqueline, “Embodied Rights: Gender Persecution, State Sovereignty, and Refugees,” Public Culture, 9 (1996), pp. 3–32.
Blake, Michael, “Immigration” in Frey, R. G. and Heath, Christopher Wellman (eds.), A Companion to Applied Ethics (Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing, 2003), pp. 224–37.
Blakesley, Christopher L., “The Practice of Extradition from Antiquity to Modern France and the United States: A Brief History,” Boston College International and Comparative Law Review, 4 (1981), pp. 39–60.
Blay, Sam, and Zimmermann, Andreas, “Recent Changes in German Refugee Law: A Critical Assessment,” American Journal of International Law, 88 (1994), pp. 361–78.
Blum, Carolyn Patty, “License to Kill: Asylum Law and the Principle of Legitimate Governmental Authority to ‘Investigate its Enemies,’Willamette Law Review, 28 (1992), pp. 719–50.
Blum, Carolyn Patty, “Political Assumptions in Asylum Decision-Making: The Example of Refugees from Armed Conflict” in Adelman, Howard (ed.), Refugee Policy: Canada and the United States (Toronto: York Lanes Press, 1991), pp. 282–91.
Bosswick, Wolfgang, “Development of Asylum Policy in Germany,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 13 (2000), pp. 43–60.
Boyle, Elizabeth Heger, and Preves, Sharon E., “National Politics as International Process: The Case of Anti-Female-Genital-Cutting Laws,” Law and Society Review, 34 (2000), pp. 703–32.
Bull, Hedley, “The Importance of Grotius in the Study of International Relations” in Bull, Hedleyet al. (eds.), Hugo Grotius and International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990).
Butler, A. Hays, “The Growing Support for Universal Jurisdiction” in Macedo, Stephen (ed.), Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes Under International Law (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004), pp. 67–76.
Caestecker, Frank, “The Transformation of Nineteenth-Century West European Expulsion Policy, 1880–1914” in Fahrmeir, Andreaset al. (eds.), Migration Control in the North Atlantic World (New York: Berghahn Books, 2003), pp. 120–37.
Carens, Joseph H., “Who Should Get In? The Ethics of Immigration Admissions,” Ethics and International Affairs, 17 (2003), pp. 95–110.
Carens, Joseph H., “The Philosopher and the Policymaker: Two Perspectives on the Ethics of Immigration with Special Attention to the Problem of Restricting Asylum” in Hailbronner, Kay, Martin, David A., and Motomura, Hiroshi (eds.), Immigration Admissions: The Search for Workable Policies in Germany and the United States (Providence, RI: Berghahn Books, 1997), pp. 3–50.
Carens, Joseph H., “Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders,” in Beiner, Ronald (ed.), Theorizing Citizenship (Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 1995), pp. 229–53.
Carens, Joseph H., “Refugees and the Limits of Obligation,” Public Affairs Quarterly, 6 (1992), pp. 31–44.
Carens, Joseph H., “States and Refugees: A Normative Analysis” in Adelman, Howard (ed.), Refugee Policy: Canada and the United States (Toronto: York Lanes Press, 1991), pp. 18–29.
Carlier, Jean-Yves, et al. (eds.), Who is a Refugee? (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1997).
Chimni, B. S., “Globalization, Humanitarianism and the Erosion of Refugee Protection,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 13 (2000), pp. 243–63.
Chimni, B. S., “The Geopolitics of Refugee Studies: A View from the South,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 11 (1998), pp. 350–74.
Cleveland, Sarah H., “Norm Internalization and U.S. Economic Sanctions,” Yale Journal of International Law, 26 (2001), pp. 1–92.
Coke, Sir Edward, The Second Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, 5th edn. (London: Streateret al., 1671).
Coke, Sir Edward, The Third Part of the Institutes of the Laws of England, (London: Flesher, 1644).
Cole, David, Enemy Aliens (New York: Free Press, 2003).
Coles, Gervase, “Approaching the Refugee Problem Today” in Loescher, Gil and Monahan, Laila, Refugees and International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989), pp. 373–410.
Coles, Gervase, “The Human Rights Approach to the Solution of the Refugee Problem: A Theoretical and Practical Enquiry” in Nash, Alan E. (ed.), Human Rights and the Protection of Refugees under International Law (Halifax: Institute for Research on Public Policy, 1988), pp. 195–222.
Constitutional Watch: A Country-by-Country Update on Constitutional Politics in Eastern Europe and the ex-USSR – Hungary,” East European Constitutional Review, 10 (Spring/Summer 2001).
Copelon, Rhonda, “Recognizing the Egregious in the Everyday: Domestic Violence as Torture,” Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 25 (1994), pp. 291–367.
Coutin, Susan Bibler, The Culture of Protest: Religious Activism and the U.S. Sanctuary Movement (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1993).
Crittenden, Ann, Sanctuary: A Story of American Conscience and the Law in Collision (New York: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1988).
Davidson, Miriam, Convictions of the Heart: Jim Corbett and the Sanctuary Movement (Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press, 1988).
Edminster, Steven, “Recklessly Risking Lives: Restrictive Interpretations of ‘Agents of Persecution’ in Germany and France” in US Committee for Refugees, World Refugee Survey, 1999 (Washington, DC: US Committee for Refugees, 1999).
Euripides, , Four Tragedies, trans. and eds. Grene, David and Lattimore, Richard (University of Chicago Press, 1955).
Fahrmeir, Andreas, Citizens and Aliens: Foreigners and the Law in Britain and the German States 1789–1870 (New York: Berghahn Books, 2000).
Faron, Olivier, and Grange, Cyril, “Paris and its Foreigners in the Late Eighteenth Century” in Fahrmeir, Andreaset al. (eds.), Migration Control in the North Atlantic World (New York: Berghahn Books, 2003), pp. 39–54.
Feinberg, Joel, “The Expressive Function of Punishment” in Feinberg, (ed.), Doing and Deserving: Essays in the Theory of Responsibility (Princeton University Press, 1970), pp. 95–118.
Feldman, David, “Changes in Nineteenth-Century Immigration Controls” in Fahrmeir, Andreaset al. (eds.), Migration Control in the North Atlantic World (New York: Berghahn Books, 2003).
Finnemore, Martha, and Sikkink, Kathryn, “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization, 52 (1998), pp. 887–917.
Fitzpatrick, Joan, “Temporary Protection of Refugees: Elements of a Formalized Regime,” American Journal of International Law, 94 (2000), pp. 279–306.
Fitzpatrick, Joan, “Flight from Asylum: Trends Toward Temporary ‘Refuge’ and Local Responses to Forced Migrations,” Virginia Journal of International Law, 35 (1994), pp. 13–70.
Foster, Michelle, “Causation in Context: Interpreting the Nexus Clause in the Refugee Convention,” Michigan Journal of International Law, 23 (2002), pp. 265–340.
Fraher, Richard M., “The Theoretical Justification for the New Criminal Law of the High Middle Ages: ‘Rei Publicae Interest, Ne Crimina Remaneant Impunita,’ ” University of Illinois Law Review, 1984 (1984), pp. 577–95.
Gaius, , The Institutes of Gaius, trans. Zulueta, Francis (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1946).
Gibney, Mark, “The Divorce Between Refugee Determinations and Pursuit of Human Rights Objectives Through U.S. Foreign Policy: The Case of Female Genital Mutilation” in Tomasi, Lydio F. (ed.), In Defense of the Alien, vol. XVIII (New York: Center for Migration Studies, 1996), pp. 170–81.
Gibney, Mark and Stohl, Michael, “Human Rights and U.S. Refugee Policy” in Gibney, Mark (ed.), Open Borders? Closed Societies? The Ethical and Political Issues (New York: Greenwood Press, 1988), pp. 151–83.
Gibney, Matthew J., The Ethics and Politics of Asylum (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
Gibney, Matthew J., “The State of Asylum: Democratization, Judicialization and Evolution of Refugee Policy in Europe,” UNHCR New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 50, October 2001.
Gibney, Matthew J., “Asylum and the Principle of Proximity,” Ethics, Place, and Environment, 3 (2000), p. 313.
Gibney, Matthew J., “Between Control and Humanitarianism: Temporary Protection in Contemporary Europe,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal 14 (Spring 2000), pp. 689–707.
Gibney, Matthew J., “Kosovo and Beyond: Popular and Unpopular Refugees,” Forced Migration Review, 5 (September 1999), pp. 28–30.
Gibney, Matthew J., “Liberal Democratic States and Responsibilities to Refugees,” American Political Science Review, 93 (1999), pp. 169–81.
Gibney, Matthew J., and Hansen, Randall, “Deportation and the Liberal State: the Forcible Return of Asylum Seekers and Unlawful Migrants in Canada, Germany and the United Kingdom,” UNHCR New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 77, February 2003.
Gilbert, Geoff, “Rights, Legitimate Expectations, Needs and Responsibilities,” International Journal of Refugee Law, 10 (1998), pp. 349–88.
Goldberg, Pamela, “Anyplace but Home,” Cornell International Law Journal, 26 (1993), pp. 565–604.
Goldhagen, Daniel Jonah, Hitler's Willing Executioners: Ordinary Germans and the Holocaust (New York: Knopf, 1996).
Goodman, Ryan, and Jinks, Derek, “How to Influence States: Socialization and International Human Rights Law,” Duke Law Journal, 54 (2004), pp. 621–703.
Goodwin-Gill, Guy, The Refugee in International Law, 2nd edn. (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).
Grahl-Madsen, Atle, The Status of Refugees in International Law, 2 vols. (Leiden: A. W. Sijthoff, 1966, 1972).
Grotius, Hugo, Rights of War and Peace, trans. Campbell, A. C. (Westport, CT: Hyperion Press, 1979).
Grotius, Hugo, De Jure Belli Ac Pacis Libri Tres, trans. Kelsey, Francis W. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1925).
Hansen, Randall, “Asylum Policy in the European Union,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 14 (2000), pp. 779–800.
Hathaway, James C., The Rights of Refugees Under International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Hathaway, James C., “Can International Refugee Law Be Made Relevant Again?” in US Committee on Refugees, World Refugee Survey 1996 (Washington, DC: US Committee on Refugees, 1996), pp. 14–19.
Hathaway, James C., “New Directions to Avoid Hard Problems: The Distortion of the Palliative Role of Refugee Protection,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 8 (1995), pp. 288–94.
Hathaway, James C., “Reconceiving Refugee Law as Human Rights Protection,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 4 (1991), pp. 113–31.
Hathaway, James C., Law of Refugee Status (Toronto: Butterworths, 1991).
Hathaway, James C. and Neve, R. Alexander, “Making International Refugee Law Relevant Again: A Proposal for Collectivized and Solution-Oriented Protection,” Harvard Human Rights Journal, 10 (1997), pp. 115–211.
Healey, Sharon A., “The Trend Toward the Criminalization and Detention of Asylum Seekers,” Human Rights Brief, 12.1 (2004), p. 14.
Held, David, et al., Global Transformations (Stanford University Press, 1999).
Helton, Arthur C., The Price of Indifference (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Helton, Arthur C., “Political Asylum Under the 1980 Refugee Act: An Unfulfilled Promise,” University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, 17 (1984), pp. 243–64.
,Herodotus, The History, trans. Grene, David (University of Chicago Press, 1987).
Heyman, Michael G., “Redefining Refugee: A Proposal for Relief for the Victims of Civil Strife,” San Diego Law Review, 24 (1987), p. 449.
Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (New York: Penguin, 1977).
Hufbauer, Gary Clyde, et al., Economic Sanctions Reconsidered: Supplemental Case Histories, 2nd edn., vol. 2 (Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1990).
,Human Rights First, “Abandoning the Persecuted: Victims of Terrorism and Oppression Barred From Asylum” (New York: Human Rights First, 2006).
,Human Rights First, “In Liberty's Shadow: U.S. Detention of Asylum Seekers in the Era of Homeland Security” (New York: Human Rights First, 2004).
Ignatieff, Michael, Human Rights as Politics and Idolatry (Princeton University Press, 2001).
,International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, Responsibility to Protect (Ottawa: International Development Research Center, 2001).
,International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, World Disasters Report 1996 (Dordrecht : Martinus Nijhoff, 1996).
Jacobson, David, Rights Across Borders (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press, 1996).
Jaeger, Gilbert, “A Comment on the Distortion of the Palliative Role of Refugee Protection,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 8 (1995), pp. 300–2.
Johnson, Kevin R., “A ‘Hard Look’ at the Executive Branch's Asylum Decisions,” Utah Law Review, 1991 (1991), p. 289.
Joly, Daniele, “A New Asylum Regime in Europe” in Nicholson, Frances and Twomey, Patrick (eds.), Refugee Rights and Realities (Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 336–56.
Justinian, , Digest of Justinian, vol. 1, trans. Watson, Alan (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998).
Justinian, , “Code of Justinian” in The Civil Law, trans. Scott, S. P. (Cincinnati, OH: Central Trust Co., 1932).
Kälin, Walter, “Non-State Agents of Persecution and the Inability of the State to Protect,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 15 (2001), pp. 415–31.
Kant, Immanuel, Political Writings, trans. and ed. Hans, Reiss (Cambridge University Press, 1991).
Katzenstein, Peter J., “Introduction: Alternative Perspectives on National Security” in Katzenstein, (ed.), The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics (New York: Columbia University Press, 1996), pp. 1–32.
Kelly, Nancy, “Gender-Related Persecution: Assessing the Asylum Claims of Women,” Cornell International Law Journal, 26 (1993), pp. 625–74.
Kerwin, Donald, “Revisiting the Need for Appointed Counsel,” mpi Insight (Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute, April 2005), pp. 12–16.
Khan, Rex D., “Why Refugee Status Should Be Beyond Judicial Review,” University of San Francisco Law Review, 35 (2000), pp. 57–81.
Kirchheimer, Otto, Political Justice: The Use of Legal Procedure for Political Ends (Princeton University Press, 1961).
Knight, W. S. M., The Life and Works of Hugo Grotius (London: Sweet and Maxwell, 1925).
Koh, Harold Hongju, “Reflections on Refoulement and Haitian Centers Council,” Harvard International Law Journal, 35 (1994), pp. 1–20.
Krasner, Stephen D., “Sovereignty, Regimes, and Human Rights” in Rittberger, Volker (ed.), Regime Theory and International Relations (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).
Lambert, Helene, “The Conceptualisation of ‘Persecution’ by the House of Lords: Horvath v. Secretary of State for the Home Department,” International Journal of Refugee Law, 13 (2001), pp. 16–31.
Legomsky, Stephen H., “Learning to Live With Unequal Justice: Asylum and the Limits to Consistency,” Stanford Law Review, 60 (2007), pp. 444–57.
Legomsky, Stephen H., “Political Asylum and the Theory of Judicial Review,” Minnesota Law Review, 73 (1989), pp. 1205–16.
Loescher, Gil, Beyond Charity (New York: Oxford University Press, 1993).
Loescher, Gil and Scanlan, John A., Calculated Kindness (New York: Free Press, 1986).
Macklin, Audrey, “Cross-Border Shopping for Ideas: A Critical Review of United States, Canadian, and Australian Approaches to Gender-Related Asylum Claims,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 13 (1998), pp. 25–71.
Marrus, Michael, The Unwanted (New York: Oxford University Press, 2002).
Martin, David A., “Two Cheers for Expedited Removal in the New Immigration Laws,” Virginia Journal of International Law, 40 (2000), pp. 673–704.
Martin, David A., “The Refugee Concept: On Definitions, Politics, and the Careful Use of a Scarce Resource” in Adelman, Howard (ed.), Refugee Policy: Canada and the United States (Toronto: York Lanes Press, 1991), pp. 30–51.
Martin, David A., “Reforming Asylum Adjudication: On Navigating the Coast of Bohemia,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 138 (1990), pp. 1247–378.
Martin, Susan, Schoenholtz, Andy, and Waller, Deborah Meyers, “Temporary Protection: Towards a New Regional and Domestic Framework,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 12 (1998), pp. 543–87.
Marx, Reinhard, “The Notion of Persecution by Non-State Agents in German Jurisprudence,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 15 (2001), pp. 447–61.
Meissner, Doris, “Reflections on the U.S. Refugee Act of 1980” in Martin, David A. (ed.), The New Asylum Seekers: Refugee Law in the 1980s (Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic, 1988).
Michelman, Frank I., “Parsing ‘A Right to Have Rights,’” Constellations, 3 (1996), pp. 200–7.
Miller, David, On Nationality (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).
Moore, Jennifer, “Whither the Accountability Theory,” International Journal of Refugee Law, 13 (2001), pp. 32–50.
Moore, Jennifer, “From Nation State to Failed State: International Protection from Human Rights Abuses by Non-State Agents,” Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 31 (1999), pp. 81–121.
Morawetz, Nancy, “Understanding the Impact of the 1996 Deportation Laws and the Limited Scope of Proposed Reforms,” Harvard Law Review, 113 (2000), pp. 1936–62.
Morrison, John, and Crosland, Beth, “The Trafficking and Smuggling of Refugees: the End Game in European Asylum Policy?,” UNCHR New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 39, 2001.
Musalo, Karen, Moore, Jennifer, and Boswell, Richard A. (eds.), Refugee Law and Policy: A Comparative and International Approach, 2nd edn. (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press, 2002).
Musalo, Karen and Knight, Stephen, “Steps Forward and Steps Back: Uneven Progress in the Law of Social Group and Gender-Based Claims in the United States,” International Journal of Refugee Law, 13 (2001), pp. 51–70.
National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States, The 9/11 Commission Report (July 2004).
Newland, Kathleen, “The Impact of U.S. Refugee Policies on U.S. Foreign Policy: A Case of the Tail Wagging the Dog?” in Teitelbaum, Michael S. and Weiner, Myron (eds.), Threatened Peoples, Threatened Borders (New York: W.W. Norton, 1995), pp. 190–214.
Noll, Gregor, “Rejected asylum seekers: the problem of return,” UNHCR New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 4, May 1999.
Note, “Political Legitimacy in the Law of Political Asylum,” Harvard Law Review, 99 (1985), pp. 450–70.
Ogletree, Jr., Charles J., “America's Schizophrenic Immigration Policy: Race, Class, and Reason,” Boston College Law Review, 41 (2000), pp. 755–70.
O'Higgins, Paul, “The History of Extradition in British Practice, 1174–1794,” Indian Year Book of International Affairs, Part II (1964), pp. 78–115.
Palmer, John R. B., Yale-Loehr, Stephen W., and Cronin, Elizabeth, “Why Are So Many People Challenging Board of Immigration Appeals Decisions in Federal Court? An Empirical Analysis of the Recent Surge in Petitions for Review,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 20 (2005), pp. 1–99.
Parry, Clive (ed.), British Digest of International Law, Part VI (London: Stevens and Sons, 1965).
Pfeiffer, Neal P., Note, “Credibility Findings in INS Asylum Adjudications: A Realistic Assessment,” Texas Journal of International Law, 23 (1988), pp. 139–151.
Phillipson, Coleman, The International Law and Custom of Ancient Greece and Rome, vol. 1 [1911], reprint (Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein, 2001).
Pistone, Michele R., and Hoeffner, John J., “Rules Are Made to Be Broken: How the Process of Expedited Removal Fails Asylum Seekers,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 20 (2006), pp. 167–211.
Pistone, Michele R., and Schrag, Philip G., “The New Asylum: Improved But Still Unfair,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 16 (2001), pp. 1–79.
Pogge, Thomas, “Migration and Poverty,” in Bader, Veit (ed.), Citizenship and Exclusion (New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997), pp. 12–27.
Porter, Bernard, The Refugee Question in Mid-Victorian Politics (Cambridge University Press, 1979).
Preston, Richard K., “Asylum Adjudications: Do State Department Advisory Opinions Violate Refugees' Rights and U.S. International Obligations?,” Maryland Law Review, 45 (1986), pp. 91–140.
Pufendorf, Samuel, De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo, trans. Oldfather, C. H. and Oldfather, W. A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934).
Pyle, Christopher H., Extradition, Politics, and Human Rights (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 2001).
Ramanthan, Erik D., “Queer Cases: A Comparative Analysis of Global Sexual Orientation-Based Asylum Jurisprudence,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 11 (1996), pp. 1–44.
Ramji-Nogales, Jaya, Schoenholtz, Andrew I., and Schrag, Philip G., “Refugee Roulette: Disparities in Asylum Adjudication,” Stanford Law Review, 60 (2007), pp. 295–411.
Randolph, Thomas Jefferson (ed.), Memoir, Correspondence, and Miscellanies from the Papers of Thomas Jefferson, 2nd edn., vol. 3 (Boston, MA: Gray and Bowen, 1830).
Rawls, John, Law of Peoples (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999).
Rieff, David, A Bed for the Night: Humanitarianism in Crisis (New York: Simon & Schuster, 2002).
Rigsby, Kent J., Asylia: Territorial Inviolability in the Hellenistic World (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1996).
Risse, Thomas P., Ropp, Steven C., and Sikkink, Kathryn, The Power of Human Rights: International Norms and Domestic Change (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Roberts, Adam, “More Refugees, Less Asylum,” Journal of Refugee Studies, 11 (1998), pp. 375–95.
Rosenberg, Lory Diana, “The Courts and Interception: The United States' Interdiction Experience and its Impact on Refugees and Asylum Seekers,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 17 (2003), pp. 199–219.
Schuck, Peter H., “Refugee Burden-Sharing: A Modest Proposal” in Schuck, (ed.), Citizens, Strangers, and In-Betweens (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998), pp. 282–325.
Schuck, Peter H., “The Devaluation of American Citizenship” in Schuck, (ed.), Citizens, Strangers, and In-Betweens (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1998), pp. 163–75.
Schumacher, Rob W. M., “Three Related Sanctuaries of Poseidon: Geraistos, Kalaureia and Tainaron” in Marinatos, Nanno and Hägg, Robin (eds.), Greek Sanctuaries: New Approaches (London: Routledge, 1993), pp. 62–87.
Sen, Amartya, Poverty and Famines: An Essay on Entitlement and Deprivation (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1981).
Shacknove, Andrew, “From Asylum to Containment,” International Journal of Refugee Law, 5 (1993), pp. 516–33.
Shacknove, Andrew, “Who is a Refugee?,” Ethics, 95 (1985), pp. 274–84.
Shklar, Judith N., American Citizenship (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).
Shoemaker, Karl Blaine, “Sanctuary Law: Changing Conceptions of Wrongdoing and Punishment in Medieval European Law,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of California-Berkeley, 2001.
Sibley, N. W., and Elias, Alfred, The Aliens Act and the Right of Asylum (London: Williams Clowes, 1906).
Singer, Peter, and Singer, Renata, “The Ethics of Refugee Policy” in Gibney, Mark (ed.), Open Borders? Closed Societies? The Ethical and Political Issues (New York: Greenwood Press, 1988), pp. 111–30.
Sinha, S. Prakash, Asylum and International Law (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1971).
Sinn, Ulrich, “Greek Sanctuaries as Places of Refuge” in Marinatos, Nanno and Hägg, Robin (eds.), Greek Sanctuaries: New Approaches (London: Routledge, 1993), pp. 88–109.
Skran, Claudena M., Refugees in Inter-War Europe: The Emergence of a Regime (New York: Oxford University Press, 1995).
Skulan, Catherine, “Australia's Mandatory Detention of ‘Unauthorized’ Asylum Seekers: History, Politics and Analysis Under International Law,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 21 (2006), pp. 61–110.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie, “Defining the Limits: Universal Jurisdiction and National Courts” in Macedo, Stephen (ed.), Universal Jurisdiction: National Courts and the Prosecution of Serious Crimes Under International Law (Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004), pp. 168–90.
Sophocles, , Three Theban Plays, trans. Fagles, Robert (New York: Penguin Books, 1982).
Soysal, Yasemin, Limits of Citizenship (University of Chicago Press, 1994).
State Papers and Publick Documents of the United States: 1789–96, vol. 1 (Boston: T. B. Wait, 1815).
Steinbock, Bonnie, and Norcross, Alastair (eds.), Killing and Letting Die, 2nd edn. (New York: Fordham University Press, 1994).
Steinbock, Daniel J., “Interpreting the Refugee Definition,” UCLA Law Review, 45 (1998), p. 794.
Stephens, Sir James Fitzjames, History of the Criminal Law of England, vol. 2 (London: Macmillan, 1883).
Storey, Hugo, and Wallace, Rebecca, “War and Peace in Refugee Law Jurisprudence,” American Journal of International Law, 95 (2001), pp. 349–66.
Suhrke, Astri, “Global Refugee Movements and Strategies of Response” in Kritz, Mary M. (ed.), U.S. Immigration and Refugee Policy: Global and Domestic Issues (Lexington, MA: Lexington Books, 1983), pp. 157–73.
Sunstein, Cass R., “On the Expressive Function of Law,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 144 (1996), pp. 2021–53.
Sztucki, Jerzy, “Who is a Refugee? The Convention Definition: Universal or Obsolete?” in Nicholson, Frances and Twomey, Patrick (eds.), Refugee Rights and Realities(Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 44–80.
Tacitus, , Historical Works, Vol. 1: The Annals, trans. Murphy, Arthur (London: J. M. Dent, 1908).
Tacitus, , The Annals, trans. Bohn, Henry G. as The Works of Tacitus: The Annals, vol. 1, Oxford, 1854.
Tamir, Yael, Liberal Nationalism (Princeton University Press, 1993).
The Expedited Removal Study: Report on the First Three Years of Implementation of Expedited Removal,” Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics and Public Policy, 15 (2001), pp. 1–155.
Thucydides, , History of the Peloponnesian War, trans. Warner, Rex (New York: Penguin Books, 1972).
Tomsho, Robert, The American Sanctuary Movement (Austin, TX: Texas Monthly Press, 1987).
Tuck, Richard, Rights of War and Peace (New York: Oxford University Press, 1999).
Tuitt, Patricia, “Rethinking the Refugee Concept” in Nicholson, Frances and Twomey, Patrick (eds.), Refugee Rights and Realities (Cambridge University Press, 1999), pp. 106–17.
Tumlin, Karen C., “Suspect First: How Terrorism Policy is Reshaping Immigration Policy,” California Law Review, 92 (2000), pp. 1173–239.
Twomey, Patrick, “Europe's Other Market: Trafficking in People,” European Journal of Migration and Law, 2 (2000), pp. 1–36.
,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR Statistical Yearbook 2005 (Geneva: UNHCR, April 2007).
,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, State of the World's Refugees 2006: Human Displacement in the New Millennium (New York: Oxford University Press, 2006).
,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, UNHCR Statistical Yearbook 2001 (Geneva: UNHCR, 2002).
,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, The State of the World's Refugees: Fifty Years of Humanitarian Action (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000).
,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, The State of the World's Refugees 1997–8: A Humanitarian Agenda (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997).
,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, “Note on International Protection,” A/AC/96/830 (September 7, 1994).
,United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Handbook on Procedures and Criteria for Determining Refugee Status under the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol relating to the Status of Refugees, HCR/IP/4/Eng/REV.1, Geneva, 1992.
,US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, World Refugee Survey 2007 (Washington, DC: US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, 2007).
,US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, World Refugee Survey 2005 (Washington, DC: US Committee for Refugees and Immigrants, 2005).
,US Committee for Refugees, World Refugee Survey 2003 (Washington, DC: US Committee for Refugees, 2003).
,US Committee for Refugees, World Refugee Survey 2002 (Washington, DC: US Committee for Refugees, 2002).
,US Committee for Refugees, World Refugee Survey 2001 (Washington, DC: US Committee for Refugees, 2001).
,US Department of Justice, Executive Office of Immigration Review, FY 2006 Statistical Year Book (February 2007).
,US Immigration and Naturalization Service, Asylum Adjudications: An Evolving Concept and Responsibility for the Immigration and Naturalization Service (June and December, 1982).
Vattel, Emer, The Law of Nations or the Principles of Natural Law, trans. Fenwick, Charles G. (Geneva: Slatkine Reprints – Henry Dunant Institute, 1983).
Vedsted-Hansen, Jens, “Europe's Response to the Arrival of Asylum Seekers: Refugee Protection and Immigration Control,” UNHCR New Issues in Refugee Research, Working Paper No. 6, May 1999.
Vermeulen, Ben, et al., “Persecution by Third Parties,” Research and Documentation Centre of the Ministry of Justice of the Netherlands, Nijmegen, May 1998.
“Veto Message, January 28, 1915,” Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, vol. 18 (New York: Bureau of National Literature, 1917), p. 8043.
Sternberg, Mark R., “The Plight of the Non-Combatant in Civil War and the New Criteria for Refugee Status,” International Journal of Refugee Law, 9 (1997), pp. 169–95.
Walzer, Michael, Spheres of Justice (New York: Basic Books, 1983).
Walzer, Michael, “The Distribution of Membership” in Brown, Peter G. and Shue, Henry (eds.), Boundaries: National Autonomy and Its Limits (Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Littlefield, 1981).
Walzer, Michael, Just and Unjust Wars (New York: Basic Books, 1977).
Weidlich, Sabine, “First Instance Asylum Proceedings in Europe: Do Bona Fide Refugees Find Protection?,” Georgetown Immigration Law Journal, 14 (2000), pp. 643–72.
Wendt, Alexander, Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Wendt, Alexander, “Constructing International Politics,” International Security, 20 (1995), pp. 71–81.
Wendt, Alexander, “Collective Identity Formation and the International State,” American Political Science Review, 88 (1994), pp. 384–96.
Wijngaert, Christine, The Political Offence Exception to Extradition (Boston, MA: Kluwer-Deventer, 1980).
Wolff, Christian, Jus Gentium Methodo Scientifica Pertractatum, trans. Drake, Joseph H. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934).
Yarnold, Barbara M., Refugees Without Refuge: Formation and Failed Implementation of U.S. Political Asylum Policy in the 1980s (Lanham, MD: University Press of America, 1990).
Zolberg, Aristide R., A Nation By Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning of America (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2006).
Zolberg, Aristide R., Suhrke, Astri, and Aguayo, Sergio, Escape From Violence (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).
Zucker, Norman and Zucker, Naomi Flink, Desperate Crossings (Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe, 1996).
Court Cases
United States: Federal Courts
Aguilar-Solis v. INS, 168 F.3d 565 (1st Cir. 1999).
American Baptist Churches v. Thornburgh, 760 F. Supp. 796 (N.D. Cal. 1991).
Baballah v. Ashcroft, 367 F.3d 1067 (9th Cir. 2004).
Baballah v. Ashcroft, 335 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2003).
Baka v. INS, 963 F.2d 1376 (10th Cir. 1992).
Barrraza Rivera v. INS, 913 F.2d 1443 (9th Cir. 1990).
Begzatowski v. INS, 278 F.3d 665 (7th Cir. 2002).
Benslimane v. Gonzales, 430 F.3d 828 (7th Cir. 2005).
Canas-Segovia v. INS, 970 F.2d 599 (9th Cir. 1992).
Canas-Segovia v. INS, 902 F.2d 717 (9th Cir. 1990).
Castaneda-Castillo v. Gonzales, 488 F.3d 17 (1st Cir. 2007) (en banc).
Chanco v. INS, 82 F.3d 298 (9th Cir. 1996).
DeShaney v. Winnebago County Department of Social Services, 489 U.S. 189 (1989).
Desir v. Ilchert, 840 F.2d 723 (9th Cir. 1988).
Diallo v. Ashcroft, 381 F.3d 687 (7th Cir. 2004).
Dwomoh v. Sava, 696 F. Supp. 970 (S.D.N.Y. 1988).
Elias-Zacarias v. INS, 502 U.S. 478 (1992).
Elien v. Ashcroft, 364 F.3d 392 (1st Cir. 2004).
Escobar v. Gonzales, 417 F.3d 363 (3d Cir. 2005).
Fatin v. INS, 12 F.3d 1233 (3rd Cir. 1993).
Filartiga v. Pena-Irala, 630 F.2d 876 (2d Cir. 1980).
Fisher v. INS, 79 F.3d 955 (9th Cir. 1996) (en banc).
Foroglou v. INS, 170 F.3d 68 (1st Cir. 1999).
Ghaly v. INS, 58 F.3d 1425 (9th Cir. 1995).
Hernandez v. Ashcroft, 345 F.3d 824 (9th Cir. 2003).
Hernandez-Ortiz v. INS, 777 F.2d 509 (9th Cir. 1985).
Iao v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 530 (7th Cir. 2005).
In re Estate of Marcos Human Rights Litig., 978 F.2d 493 (9th Cir. 1992).
INS v. Aguirre-Aguirre, 526 U.S. 415 (1999).
INS v. Cardoza-Fonseca, 480 U.S. 421 (1987).
INS v. Doherty, 502 U.S. 314 (1992).
Johnson v. Eisentrager, 339 U.S. 763 (1950).
Kadic v. Karadzic, 70 F.3d 232 (2d Cir. 1995).
Kaveh-Haghigy v. INS, 783 F.2d 1321 (9th Cir. 1986).
Kovac v. INS, 407 F.2d 102 (9th Cir. 1969).
Lazo-Majano v. INS, 813 F.2d 1432 (9th Cir. 1987).
Li v. Ashcroft, 356 F.3d 1153 (9th Cir. 2004) (en banc).
Li v. Ashcroft, 312 F.3d 1094 (9th Cir. 2002).
M.A. v. INS, 899 F.2d 304 (4th Cir. 1990).
Maldonado-Cruz v. U.S. I.N.S., 883 F.2d 788 (9th Cir. 1989).
Mathews v. Diaz, 426 U.S. 67 (1976).
Matter of Doherty, 599 F. Supp. 270 (S.D.N.Y. 1984).
Mikhailevitch v. INS, 146 F.3d 384 (6th Cir. 1998).
Mitev v. INS, 67 F.3d 1325 (7th Cir. 1995).
Osaghae v. INS, 942 F.2d 1160 (7th Cir. 1991).
Perlera-Escobar v. Executive Office for Immigration, 894 F.2d 1292 (9th Cir. 1990).
Pitcherskaia v. INS, 118 F.3d 641 (9th Cir. 1997).
Prasad v. INS, 47 F.3d 336 (9th Cir. 1995).
Safaie v. INS, 25 F.3d 636 (8th Cir. 1994).
Sale v. Haitian Centers Council, 509 U.S. 155 (1993).
Schoenmetz v. Ingham, 949 F. Supp. 152 (W.D.N.Y. 1996).
Singh v. Ilchert, 801 F. Supp. 313 (N.D. Cal. 1992).
Skalak v. INS, 944 F.2d 364 (7th Cir. 1991).
Sosa v. Alvarez-Machain, 542 U.S. 692 (2004).
Tachiona v. Mugabe, 234 F. Supp. 2d 401 (S.D.N.Y. 2002).
Town of Castle Rock, Colo. v. Gonzales, 545 U.S. 748 (2005).
Ucelo-Gomez v. Gonzales, 464 F.3d 163 (2d Cir. 2006).
Valdiviezo-Galdamez v. Attorney General, 502 F.3d 285 (3d Cir. 2007).
Wang v. Attorney General, 423 F.3d 260 (3d Cir. 2005).
Xuncax v. Gramajo, 886 F. Supp. 162 (D. Mass. 1995).
Yadegar-Sargis v. INS, 297 F.3d 596 (7th Cir. 2002).
Zehatye v. Gonzales, 453 F.3d 1182 (9th Cir. 2006).
United States: Board of Immigration Appeals
In re H –, 21 I. & N. Dec. 337 (BIA 1996).
In re R – A –, 22 I. & N. Dec. 906 (BIA 1999).
In re S – P –, 21 I. & N. Dec. 486 (BIA 1996).
Matter of A – G –, 19 I. & N. Dec. 502 (BIA 1987).
Matter of Acosta, 19 I. & N. Dec. 211 (BIA 1985).
Matter of B –, 21 I. & N. Dec. 66 (BIA 1995).
Matter of Chang, 20 I. & N. Dec. 38 (BIA 1989).
Matter of Chen, 20 I. & N. Dec. 16 (BIA 1989).
Matter of Izatula, 20 I. & N. Dec. 149 (BIA 1990).
Matter of Kasinga, 21 I. & N. 357 (BIA 1996).
Matter of Maldonado-Cruz, 19 I. & N. Dec. 509 (BIA 1988).
Matter of R –, 20 I. & N. Dec. 621 (BIA 1992).
Matter of Rodriguez-Majano, 19 I & N Dec. 811 (BIA 1988).
Australia
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v. Abdi [1999] 162 A.L.R. 105 (Fed. Ct. Aust.).
Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v. Khawar [2002] H.C.A. 14.
Canada
Canada (Attorney General) v. Ward [1993] S.C.R. 689.
Cheung v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration) [1993] 102 D.L.R. (4th) 214 (Fed. Ct. App.).
Hinzman v. Canada [2007] F.C.A. 171.
Hinzman v. Minister of Citizenship and Immigration [2006] F.C. 420.
Isa v. Secretary of State (Canada) [1995] 28 Imm. L.R. (2d) 68 (Fed. Ct.).
MCI v. Jessica Robyn Dolamore [2001] F.T.C. 421.
Salibian v. Canada [1990] 3 F.C. 250.
United Kingdom
A v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2003] EWCA Civ. 175 (CA).
Adan v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [1999] 1 A.C. 293.
Horvath v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2001] 1 A.C. 489.
In re Meunier [1894] 2 Q.B. 415.
R. (Limbuela) v. Secretary of State for the Home Department [2004] Q.B. 1440.
R. v. Immigration Appeal Tribunal and another, ex parte Shah [1999] 2 A.C. 629.
New Zealand
Refugee Appeal No. 71462/99 (September 27, 1999).
Refugee Appeal No. 71427/99, [2000] N.Z.A.R. 545 (August 16, 2000).
Refugee Appeal No. 74665/03 (July 7, 2004).

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed