References
Achinstein, Peter (2019). Speculation: Within and about Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Agin, Dan (2006). Junk Science: How Politicians, Corporations, and Other Hucksters Betray Us. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Alters, Brian J. (1997). “Whose Nature of Science?,” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 34 (1): 39–55.
Betz, Gregor (2013). “In Defence of the Value Free Ideal,” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (2): 207–220.
Blancke, Stefaan, Boudry, Maarten, and Pigliucci, Massimo (2016). “Why Do Irrational Beliefs Mimic Science? The Cultural Evolution of Pseudoscience,” Theoria 83 (1): 78–97.
Boner, Patrick J. (2013). Kepler’s Cosmological Synthesis: Astrology, Mechanism and the Soul. Boston, MA: Brill.
Boudry, Maarten (2013). “Loki’s Wager and Laudan’s Error: On Genuine and Territorial Demarcation,” in Pigliucci, M. and Boudry, M. (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 79–98.
Boudry, Maarten (2022). “Diagnosing Pseudoscience – by Getting Rid of the Demarcation Problem,” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 53 (2): 83–101.
Boudry, Maarten, Blancke, Stefaan, and Pigliucci, Massimo (2015). “What Makes Weird Beliefs Thrive? The Epidemiology of Pseudoscience,” Philosophical Psychology 28 (8): 1177–1198.
Bunge, Mario (1983). Treatise on Basic Philosophy: Volume 6: Epistemology & Methodology II: Understanding the World. Dordrecht: Springer.
Calver, Neil (2013). “Sir Peter Medawar: Science, Creativity and the Popularization of Karl Popper,” Notes and Records of the Royal Society 67: 301–314.
Chigwedere, Pride, Seage, George R. III, Gruskin, Sofia, Lee, Tun-Hou, and Essex, M. (2008). “Estimating the Lost Benefits of Antiretroviral Drug Use in South Africa,” JAIDS: Journal of Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndromes 49 (4): 410–415.
Cioffi, Frank (2013). “Pseudoscience: The Case of Freud’s Sexual Etiology of the Neuroses,” in Pigliucci, M. and Boudry, M. (eds.) Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 321–340.
Close, Frank (1991). Too Hot to Handle: The Race for Cold Fusion. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Collins, Harry, and Pinch, Trevor (1982). Frames of Meaning: The Social Construction of Extraordinary Science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Collins, Harry, and Pinch, Trevor (1998). The Golem: What You Should Know about Science. 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press.
Collins, Harry, Bartlett, Andrew, and Reyes-Galindo, Luis (2017). “Demarcating Fringe Science for Policy,” Perspectives on Science 25 (4): 411–438.
Cooter, Roger (1990). “The Conservativism of ‘Pseudoscience’,” in Grim, P. (ed.), Philosophy of Science and the Occult. 2nd ed. Albany, NY: SUNY Press, 156–169.
Coulter, Harris L. (1984). “Homeopathy,” in Salmon, J. Warren (ed.), Alternative Medicines: Popular and Policy Perspectives. New York and London: Routledge, 57–79.
Currie, Adrian (2016). “Ethnographic Analogy, the Comparative Method, and Archeological Special Pleading,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55: 84–94.
Currie, Adrian (2023). “Science & Speculation,” Erkenntnis 88: 597–619.
Currie, Adrian, and Turner, Derek (2016). “Introduction: Scientific Knowledge of the Deep Past,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 55: 43–46.
Dawid, Richard (2013). String Theory and the Scientific Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dawid, Richard (2019). “The Significance of Non-empirical Confirmation in Fundamental Physics,” in Dardashti, R., Dawid, R., and Thébault, K. (eds.), Why Trust a Theory? Epistemology of Fundamental Physics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 99–119.
De Cruz, Helen (2023). “Believing to Belong: Addressing the Novice-Expert Problem in Polarized Scientific Communication,” in Baghramian, M. and Martini, C. (eds.), Questioning Experts and Expertise. New York and London: Routledge, 5–17.
De Morgan, Augustus (1915). A Budget of Paradoxes. 2nd ed. Chicago and London: Open Court.
Deutsch, David (1997). The Fabric of Reality: The Science of Parallel Universes – and Its Implications. New York: Penguin Books.
Dobbs, Betty. J. T. (1983). The Foundations of Newton’s Alchemy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Douglas, Heather (2000). “Inductive Risk and Values in Science,” Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 559–579.
Douglas, Heather (2009). Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Elgin, Mehmet and Sober, Elliott (2017) “Popper’s Shifting Appraisal of Evolutionary Theory,” HOPOS: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 7: 31–55.
Elliott, Kevin C. (2022). Values in Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elliott, Kevin C., and Richards, Ted (eds.) (2017). Exploring Inductive Risk: Case Studies of Values in Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elliott, Kevin C. and Steel, Daniel (eds.) (2019). Current Controversies in Values and Science. London and New York: Routledge.
Fasce, Angelo (2017). “What Do We Mean When We Speak of Pseudoscience? The Development of a Demarcation Criterion Based on the Analysis of Twenty-One Previous Attempts,” Disputatio 6 (7): 459–488.
Fernandez-Beanato, Damian (2020). “The Multicriterial Approach to the Problem of Demarcation,” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 51 (3): 375–390.
Barbara, Forrest, and Gross, Paul R. (2007). Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
France, Robert L. (2020). “From Cryptozoology to Conservation Biology: An Earlier Baseline for Entanglement of Marine Fauna in the Western Pacific Revealed from Historic ‘Sea Serpent’ Sightings,” Advances in Historical Studies 9: 45–69.
Friedlander, Michael W. (1995). At the Fringes of Science. San Francisco, CA: Westview Press.
Gardner, Michael (1957). Fads and Fallacies in the Name of Science. 2nd ed. New York: Dover.
Gieryn, Thomas F. (1996). “At the Fringes of Science, by Michael W. Friedlander,” Isis 87 (4): 767–768.
Gieryn, Thomas F. (1999). Cultural Boundaries of Science: Credibility on the Line. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Gish, Duane T. (1995). Evolution: The Fossils Still Say NO! El Cajon, CA: Institute for Creation Research.
Goldacre, Ben (2009). Bad Science. London: Harper Perennial.
Goldacre, Ben (2012). Bad Pharma: How Drug Companies Mislead Doctors and Harm Patients. London: Fourth Estate.
Goldenberg, Maya J. (2021). Vaccine Hesitancy: Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Goldenberg, Maya J. (2023). “Public Trust in Science,” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 48 (2): 366–378.
Gordin, Michael (2023). Pseudoscience: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Grünbaum, Adolf (1984). The Foundations of Psychoanalysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Hacking, Ian (1979). “Imre Lakatos’s Philosophy of Science,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 30 (4): 381–402.
Halpern, Megan K., and Elliott, Kevin C. (2022). “Science as Experience: A Deweyan Model of Science Communication,” Perspectives on Science 30 (4): 621–656.
Hansson, Sven O. (2009). “Cutting the Gordian knot of demarcation,” International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 23 (3): 237–243.
Hansson, Sven O. (2013). “Defining Pseudoscience and Science,” in Pigliucci, M. and Boudry, M. (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 61–77.
Hansson, Sven O. (2017). “Science Denial as a Form of Pseudoscience,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 63: 39–47.
Hansson, Sven O. (2020). “With All This Pseudoscience, Why So Little Pseudotechnology?” Axiomathes 30 (6): 685–696.
Hecht, David K. (2018). “Pseudoscience and the Pursuit of Truth,” in Kaufman, A. B. and Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), Pseudoscience: The Conspiracy against Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 3–20.
Hirvonen, Ilmari, and Karisto, Janne (2022). “Demarcation without Dogmas,” Theoria 88 (3): 701–720.
Holman, Bennett, and Wilholt, Torsten (2022). “The New Demarcation Problem,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 91: 211–220.
Hossenfelder, Sabine (2018). Lost in Math. New York: Basic Books.
Houran, James and Bauer, Henry (2022). “‘Fringe Science’ – A Tautology, Not Pariah,” Journal of Scientific Exploration 36 (2): 207–217.
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul (2013). Systematicity: The Nature of Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hoyningen-Huene, Paul (2019). “Replies,” Synthese 196 (3): 907–928.
Hudson, Robert (2016). “Why We Should Not Reject the Value-Free Ideal of Science,” Perspectives on Science 24 (2): 167–191.
Hull, David L. (1999). “The Use and Abuse of Sir Karl Popper,” Biology and Philosophy 14: 481–504.
Jia, Katherine M. Hanage, William P., Lipsitch, Marc et al. (2023). “Estimated Preventable COVID-19 Associated Deaths due to Non-vaccination in the United States,” European Journal of Epidemiology 38 (11): 1125–1128.
Jones, Ian, Adams, Andrew, and Mayoh, Joanne (2023). “Motivated Ignorance and Social Identity Threat: The Case of the Flat Earth,” Journal for the Study of Race, Nation and Culture 29 (1): 79–94.
Kaiser, David (2011). How the Hippies Saved Physics: Science, Counterculture, and the Quantum Revival. New York: W.W. Norton.
Kennefick, Daniel (2021). No Shadow of a Doubt: The 1919 Eclipse That Confirmed Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Kitcher, Philip (1982). Abusing Science: The Case against Creationism. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Kitcher, Philip (2001). Science, Truth, and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Koskinen, Inkeri, and Rolin, Kristina (2022). “Distinguishing between Legitimate and Illegitimate Roles for Values in Transdisciplinary Research,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 91: 191–198.
Kourany, Janet (2008). “Replacing the Ideal of Value-Free Science,” in Carrier, M., Howard, D., and Kourany, J. (eds.), The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 87–111.
Kuhn, Thomas (1962). The Structure of Scientific Theories. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Kuhn, Thomas (1970). “Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?” in Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–23.
Kuhn, Thomas (1977). “Objectivity, Value Judgment, and Theory Choice,” in The Essential Tension: Selected Studies in Scientific Tradition and Change. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 320–339.
Labinger, Jay A., and Collins, Harry (eds.) (2001). The One Culture? A Conversation about Science. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Lakatos, Imre (1968). “Criticism and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69: 149–186.
Lakatos, Imre (1970). “Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes,” in Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–196.
Lakatos, Imre (1973/1999). “Lectures on Scientific Method,” in Motterlini, M. (ed.), For and against Method, including Lakatos’s Lectures on Scientific Method and the Lakatos-Feyerabend Correspondence. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 19–112.
Lakatos, Imre (1974/1978). “Popper on Demarcation and Induction,” in Worrall, J. and Currie, G. (eds.), Imre Lakatos: The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 139–167.
Langmuir, Irving (1989). “Pathological Science,” (edited by Hall, Robert N.), Physics Today 42: 36–48.
Laudan, Larry (1981). “A Confutation of Convergent Realism,” Philosophy of Science 48 (1): 19–49.
Laudan, Larry (1983). “The Demise of the Demarcation Problem,” in Cohen, R. S. and Laudan, L. (eds.), Physics, Philosophy and Psychoanalysis: Essays in Honor of Adolf Grünbaum. Dordrecht: D. Reidel, 111–127.
Leng, Gareth and Ivor Leng, Rhodri (2020). The Matter of Facts: Skepticism, Persuasion, and Evidence in Science. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Lloyd, Elisabeth A., and Winsberg, Eric (eds.) (2018). Climate Modelling: Philosophical and Conceptual Issues. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Daniel, Loxton, and Prothero, Donald R. (2013). Abominable Science! Origins of the Yeti, Nessie, and Other Famous Cryptids. New York: Columbia University Press.
John, Lyne, and Howe, Henry F. (1986). “Punctuated Equilibria,” Quarterly Journal of Speech 72 (2): 132–147.
Mackenzie, Donald A. (1981). Statistics in Britain 1865–1930: The Social Construction of Scientific Knowledge. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Mahner, Martin. (2013). “Science and Pseudoscience How to Demarcate after the (Alleged) Demise,” in Pigliucci, M. and Boudry, M. (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 29–43.
Mahner, Martin (2007). “Demarcating Science from Non-science,” in Kuipers, T. A. F. (ed.), General Philosophy of Science: Focal Issues. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 515–575.
Malthouse, E. (2023). “Confirmation Bias and Vaccine-Related Beliefs in the Time of COVID-19,” Journal of Public Health 45 (2): 523–528.
Mason-Wilkes, Will (2023). “Emphasizing Uncertainty, Celebrating Community and Valuing Values: Science Communication Remedies for the COVID-19 Era and Beyond,” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 48 (2): 379–393.
McIntyre, Lee (2019). The Scientific Attitude: Defending Science from Denial, Fraud, and Pseudoscience. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
McIntyre, Lee (2021). How to Talk to a Science Denier: Conversations with Flat Earthers, Climate Deniers, and Others Who Defy Reason. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
McMullin, Ernan (1982). “Values in Science,” Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 2: 3–28.
Menon, Tarun and Stegenga, Jacob (2023). “Sisyphean Science: Why Value Freedom Is Worth Pursuing?” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 13 (48): 1–24.
Miller, Jon D. (1983). “Scientific literacy: A Conceptual and Empirical Review.” Daedalus 11 (2): 9–48.
Nersessian, Nancy J. (2022). Interdisciplinarity in the Making. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Nickerson, Raymond. S. (1998). “Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises,” Review of General Psychology 2 (2): 175–220.
Numbers, Ronald L. (2006). The Creationists: From Scientific Creationism to Intelligent Design. Expanded Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Offit, Paul A. (2018). Bad Advice: Or Why Celebrities, Politicians, and Activists Aren’t Your Best Source of Health Information. New York: Columbia University Press.
Oreskes, Naomi (1999). The Rejection of Continental Drift: Theory and Method in American Earth Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Oreskes, Naomi (2019). “Systematicity Is Necessary, but Not Sufficient: On the Problem of Facsimile Science,” Synthese 196: 881–905.
Oreskes, Naomi and Conway, Erik M. (2011). Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury.
Oreskes, Naomi and Conway, Erik M. (2022). “From Anti-Government to Anti-Science: Why Conservatives Have Turned against Science,” Daedalus 151 (4): 98–123.
Park, Robert (2000). Voodoo Science: The Road from Foolishness to Fraud. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pigliucci, Massimo (2002). Denying Evolution: Creationism, Scientism, and the Nature of Science. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
Pigliucci, Massimo (2013). “The Demarcation Problem: A (Belated) Response to Laudan,” in Pigliucci, M. and Boudry, M. (eds.), Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 9–28.
Pigliucci, Massimo, and Boudry, Maarten (2013). Philosophy of Pseudoscience: Reconsidering the Demarcation Problem. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
Popper, Karl (1933/2002). “A Criterion of the Empirical Character of Theoretical Systems,” in Popper, K., The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York and London: Routledge, 313–316.
Popper, Karl (1957/1969). “Science: Conjectures and Refutations,” in Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 3rd ed., 33–65.
Popper, Karl (1959/2002). The Logic of Scientific Discovery. New York and London: Routledge.
Popper, Karl (1963/1969). “The Demarcation between Science and Metaphysics,” in Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of Scientific Knowledge. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, 3rd ed., 253–292.
Popper, Karl (1968). “Remarks on the Problems of Demarcation and of Rationality,” in Lakatos, I. and Musgrave, A. (eds.), Problems in the Philosophy of Science. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 88–102.
Popper, Karl (1972). Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Popper, Karl (1974a). “Darwinism as a Metaphysical Research Programme,” in Unended Quest. London: Fontana, 167–180.
Popper, Karl (1974b). “The Philosopher Replies,” in Schilpp, P. A. (ed.), The Philosophy of Karl Popper, La Salle, IL: Open Court, 961–1197.
Popper, Karl. (1978). “Natural Selection and the Emergence of Mind,” Dialectica 32 (3/4): 339–355.
Radder, Hans (1982). “An Immanent Criticism of Lakatos’ Account of the ‘Degenerating Phase’ of Bohr’s Atomic Theory,” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 13 (1): 99–109.
Rampton, Sheldon, and Stauber, John (2002). Trust Us, We’re Experts! How Industry Manipulates Science and Gambles with Your Future. New York: Penguin Putnam.
Reisch, George (2019). The Politics of Paradigms: Thomas S. Kuhn, James B. Conant, and the Cold War Struggle for Men’s Minds. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Resnik, David (2000). “A Pragmatic Approach to the Demarcation Problem,” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 31 (2): 249–267.
Resnik, David B. and Elliott, Kevin C. (2023). “Science, Values and the New Demarcation Problem,” Journal for General Philosophy of Science 54: 259–286.
Rossi, Lorenzo, Gippoliti, Spartaco, and Maria Angelici, Francesco (2018). “The Role of Indirect Evidence and Traditional Ecological Knowledge in the Discovery and Description of New Ape and Monkey Species since 1980,” Primates; Journal of Primatology 59 (4): 327–337.
Rowbottom, Darrell P. (2011). Popper’s Critical Rationalism: A Philosophical Investigation. New York and London: Routledge.
Rowbottom, Darrell P. (2023). Scientific Progress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ruse, Michael (1977). “Karl Popper’s Philosophy of Biology,” Philosophy of Science 44 (4): 638–661.
Ruse, Michael (ed.) (1996). But Is It Science? The Philosophical Question in the Creation/Evolution Controversy. New York: Prometheus Books.
Sarkar, Sahotra (2007). Doubting Darwin? Creationist Designs on Evolution. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schickore, Jutta and Steinle, Friedrich (eds.) (2006). Revisiting Discovery and Justification: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction. Dordrecht: Springer.
Schindler, Samuel (2018). Theoretical Virtues in Science: Uncovering Reality through Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schindler, Samuel (2024). “Normal Science: Not Uncritical or Dogmatic,” Synthese 203: 108.
Sinatra, Gale M., and Hofer, Barbara K. (2021). Science Denial: Why It Happens and What to Do about It. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Specter, Michael (2009). Denialism: How Irrational Thinking Hinders Scientific Progress, Harms the Planet, and Threatens Our Lives. New York: The Penguin Press.
Stamenkovic, Philippe (2024). “Straightening the ‘Value-Laden Turn’: Minimising the Influence of Values in Science,” Synthese 203: 20.
Steel, Daniel (2010). “Epistemic Values and the Argument from Inductive Risk,” Philosophy of Science 77 (1): 14–34.
Sturrock, Peter A. (1988). “Brave New Heresies,” New Scientist 24 (31): 49–51.
Taubes, Gary (1993). Bad Science: The Short Life and Weird Times of Cold Fusion. New York: Random House.
Thagard, Paul R. (1978). “Why Astrology Is a Pseudoscience?” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1: 223–234.
Thagard, Paul R. (1988). Computational Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Turner, Derek (2007). Making Prehistory: Historical Science and the Scientific Realism Debate. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Uebel, Thomas (2019). “Verificationism and (Some of) Its Discontents,” Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 7 (4): 1–31.
Varga, Somogy (2021). “Medicine as Science: Systematicity and Demarcation,” Synthese 199 (3): 3783–3804.
Walsh, Kirsten (2009). Has Laudan Killed the Demarcation Principle? Master Dissertation. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.
Winsberg, Eric (2018). Philosophy and Climate Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1986). Philosophical Investigations. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wrobel, Arthur (ed.) (1987). Pseudo-Science and Society in Nineteenth-Century America. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
Zachmann, Karin, Bondio, Mariacarla Gadebusch, Jukola, Saana, and Sparschuh, Olga (eds.) (2023). Evidence Contestation: Dealing with Dissent in Knowledge Societies. New York and London: Routledge.
