Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 396
    • Show more authors
    • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      March 2010
      October 2003
      ISBN:
      9780511667251
      Dimensions:
      Weight & Pages:
      Dimensions:
      Weight & Pages:
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
  • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org

    Book description

    This text is a highly accessible and authoritative approach to the theory and practice of teaching writing to students of English.This book is an accessible and authoritative approach to the theory and practice of teaching writing to students of English. It sets out the key issues in second language writing instruction to offer both pre-service and in-service teachers a guide to writing instruction grounded in current theory and research. The author takes the stance that student writers not only need realistic strategies for drafting and revising, but also a clear understanding of genre to structure their writing experience according to the demands and constraints of particular target contexts. This book will be extremely useful to prospective and practicing teachers alike.

    Refine List

    Actions for selected content:

    Select all | Deselect all
    • View selected items
    • Export citations
    • Download PDF (zip)
    • Save to Kindle
    • Save to Dropbox
    • Save to Google Drive

    Save Search

    You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

    Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
    ×

    Contents

    References
    Akar, D., and Louhiala-Salminen, L. (1999). Towards a new genre: a comparative study of business faxes. In F. Bargiela-Chiappini and G. Nickerson (eds.), Writing business: genres, media and discourses. London: Longman
    Allison, D. (2002). Approaching English language research. Singapore: Singapore University Press
    Altman, H. (1980). Foreign language teaching: focus on the learner. In H. Altman and C. Vaughan James (eds.), Foreign language teaching: meeting individual needs. Oxford: Pergamon
    Aston, G. (1997). Involving learners in developing learning methods: exploiting text corpora in self access. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 204– 14). London: Longman
    Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Bachman, L., and Palmer, A. (1996). Language testing in practice: designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Bailey, K. (1990). The use of diary studies in teacher education programs. In J. Richards and D. Nunan (eds.), Second language teacher education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Ballard, B., and Clanchy, J. (1991). Assessment by misconception: cultural influences and intellectual traditions. In L. Hamp-Lyons (ed.), Assessing second language writing in academic contexts (pp. 19–35). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
    Bargiela-Chiappini, F., and Nickerson, G. (eds.). (1999). Writing business: genres, media and discourses. London: Longman
    Barnett, M. (1989). More than meets the eye. Foreign language reading: theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
    Barton, D., and Hamilton, M. (1998). Local literacies. London: Routledge
    Bates, L., Lane, J., and Lange, E. (1993). Writing clearly: responding toESLcomposition. Boston: Heinle & Heinle
    Bazerman, C., and Russell, D. (eds.). (1994). Landmark essays on writing across the curriculum. Davis, CA: Hermagoras Press
    Belanoff, P., and Dickson, M. (eds.). (1991). Portfolios: process and product. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann
    Bell, J. (1999). Doing your research project (3rd ed.). Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press
    Bell, J., and Gower, R. (1998). Writing course materials for the world: a great compromise. In B. Tomlinson (ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 116–29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
    Benesch, S., Rakijas, M., and Rorschach, B. (1987). Academic writing workshop. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth
    Bereiter, C., and Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
    Berg, E. C. (1999). The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8 (3), 215–37
    Bernhardt, S., Edwards, P., and Wojahan, P. (1989). Teaching college composition with computers: a timed observation study. Written Communication, 7, 342–74
    Berwick, R. (1989). Needs assessment in language programming: from theory to practice. In R. Johnson (ed.), The second language curriculum. New York: Cambridge University Press
    Bhatia, V. K. (1993). Analysing Genre: Language use in professional settings. London: Longman
    Bhatia, V. K. (1997). The power and politics of genre. World Englishes, 17(3), 359–71
    Bialystok, E. (1985). The compatibility of teaching and learning strategies. Applied Linguistics, 6, 255–62
    Bizzell, P. (1992). Academic discourse and critical consciousness. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press
    Blass, L., and Pike-Baky, M. (1985). Mosaic I: a content-based writing book. New York: Random House
    Board of Studies. (1998a). K-6 English Syllabus: Sydney, NSW: Board of Studies
    Board of Studies. (1998b). K-6 English Syllabus: Modules. Sydney, NSW: Board of Studies
    Braine, G., and Yorozu, M. (1998). Local Area Network (LAN) computers in ESL and EFL writing classes: promises and realities. JALT Journal, 20(2), 47–59
    Breen, M. (2001). Syllabus design. In R. Carter and D. Nunan (eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching Engish to speakers of other languages (pp. 151–9). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: a systematic approach to program development. Boston: Heinle & Heinle
    Brown, J. D., and Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 653–75
    Brown, K., and Hood, S. (1989). Writing matters: writing skills and strategies for students of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Bruffee, K. (1986). Social construction: Language and the authority of knowledge. A bibliographical essay. College English, 48, 773–9
    Bruner, J. S. (1986). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
    Burns, A. (1990). Genre-based approaches to writing and beginning adult ESL learners. Prospect, 5(3), 62–71
    Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., and Yallop, C. (2000). Using functional grammar: an explorer's guide (2nd ed.). Sydney: NCELTR
    Buttjes, D., and Byram, M. (eds.). (1991). Mediating languages and cultures: towards an intercultural theory of foreign language education. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters
    Byrne, D. (1988). Teaching writing skills. Harlow, UK: Pearson Education
    Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Canale, M., and Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of communicative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied Linguistics, 1(1–47)
    Carson, J., and Leki, I. (eds.). (1993). Reading in the composition classroom. Boston: Heinle & Heinle
    Carson, J., and Nelson, G. (1996). Chinese students' perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 1–19
    Chang, Y.-Y., and Swales, J. (1999). Informal elements in English academic writing: threats or opportunities for advanced non-native speakers? In C. N. Candlin and K. Hyland (eds.), Writing: texts, processes and practices (pp. 145–67). London: Longman
    Clarke, D. (1989). Communicative theory and its influence on materials production. Language Teaching, 73–86
    Clyne, M. (1987). Cultural differences in the organisation of academic texts. Journal of Pragmatics, 11, 211–47
    Coe, N., Rycroft, R., and Ernest, P. (1992). Writing: A problem solving approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Cohen, A. (1994). Assessing language ability in the classroom (2nd ed.). Boston: Heinle and Heinle
    Cohen, M., Manion, L., and Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Routledge
    Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Connor, U., and Asenavage, K. (1994). Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: how much impact on revision? Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 257–76
    Connors, R., and Lunsford, A. (1993). Teachers' rhetorical comments on student papers. College Composition and Communication, 44, 200–223
    Cook, G. (1989). Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Crookes, G., and Gass, S. (eds.). (1993). Tasks in a pedagogical context: integrating theory and practice. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters
    Cumming, A. (1985). Responding to the writing of ESL students. Highway One, 8, 58–78
    Cumming, A. (2003). Experienced ESL/EFL writing instructors' conceptualizations of their teaching: curriculum options and implications. In B. Kroll (ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 71–92). New York: Cambridge University Press
    Cunningsworth, A. (1995). Choosing your coursebook. Oxford: Heinemann
    Daedalus. (1997). Integrated Writing Environment [Computer Software]. Austin, TX: The Daedalus Group
    Davies, A., Brown, A., Elder, C., Hill, K., Lumley, T., and McNamara, T. (1999). Dictionary of language testing. Cambridge: CUP/UCLES
    Davis, B., and Thiede, R. (2000). Writing into change: style shifting in asynchronous electronic discourse. In M. Warshauer and R. Kern (eds.), Network-based language teaching: concepts and practice (pp. 87–120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Day, R., and Bamford, J. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Larios, J., Murphy, L., and Manchon, R. (1999). The use of restructuring strategies in EFL writing: a study of Spanish learners of English as a Foreign Language. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, 13–44
    DeMauro, G. (1992). An investigation of the appropriateness of theTOEFLtest as a matching variable to equateTWEtopics. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service Report No. 37
    Denzin, N., and Lincoln, Y (eds.). (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    Douglas, D. (2000). Assessing languages for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Dudeny, G. (2000). The internet and the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Dudley-Evans, T., and St John, M.-J. (1998). Developments in English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Elbow, P. (1998). Writing with power: techniques for mastering the writing process. New York: Oxford University Press
    Ellis, R. (1987). Contextual variability in second language acquisition and the relevancy of language teaching. In R. Ellis (ed.), Second language acquisition in context (pp. 179–94). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
    Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Ellis, R. (1999). Input-based approaches to teaching grammar: a review of classroom-oriented research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 19, 64–80
    Faigley, L. (1986). Competing theories of process: a critique and a proposal. College English, 48, 527–42
    Fathman, A., and Whalley, E. (1990). Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: research insights for the classroom (pp. 178–90). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Feez, S. (1998). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: Mcquarie University/AMES
    Ferris, D. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315–39
    Ferris, D. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
    Ferris, D., and Hedgcock, J. S. (1998). TeachingESLcomposition: purpose, process, practice. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
    Ferris, D., Pezone, S., Tade, C., and Tinti, S. (1997). Teacher commentary on student writing: descriptions and implications. Journal of Second Language Writing, 6, 155–82
    Flower, L. (1989). Cognition, context and theory building. College Composition and Communication, 40, 282–311
    Flower, L. (1994). The construction of negotiated meaning: A social cognitive theory of writing. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press
    Flower, L., and Hayes, J. (1980). The cognition of discovery: defining a rhetorical problem. College Composition and Communication, 31, 21–32
    Flower, L., and Hayes, J. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32, 365–87
    Flowerdew, J. (1999). Problems in writing for scholarly publication in English: the case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8 (3): 243–64
    Freadman, A. (1994). Anyone for tennis? In A. Freadman and P. Medway (eds.), Genre and the new rhetoric (pp. 43–66). London: Taylor & Francis
    Friere, P. (1974). Education for critical consciousness. London: Sheed and Ward
    Gere, A. (1987). Writing groups: history, theory, and implications. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press
    Gerrard, L. (1989). Computers and basic writers: a critical view. In G. Hawisher and C. Selfe (eds.), Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction (pp. 94–108). New York: Teachers' College Press
    Goldstein, L., and Conrad, S. (1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24(3): 443–60
    Grabe, W. (2001). Reading-writing relations: theoretical perspectives and institutional practices. In D. Belcher and A. Hirvela (eds.), Linking literacies: perspectives on L2 reading and writing connections (pp. 15–47). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
    Grabe, W. (2003). Reading and writing relations: L2 perspectives on research and practice. In B. Kroll (ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 242–61). New York: Cambridge University Press
    Grabe, W., and Kaplan, R. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. Harlow: Longman
    Grellet, F. (1996). Writing for advanced learners of English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Haas, C. (1994). Learning to read biology: One student's rhetorical development in college. Written Communication, 11(1), 43–84
    Hadfield, J. (1992). Classroom dynamics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold
    Halliday, M. A. K., and Hasan, R. (1989). Language, context and text: aspects of language in a social semiotic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Hamp-Lyons, L. (ed). (1991). Assessing second language writing in academic contexts. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
    Hamp-Lyons, L., and Condon, W. (1993). Questioning assumptions about portfolio-based assessment. College Composition and Communication, 44(2), 176–90
    Hamp-Lyons, L., and Condon, W. (2000). Assessing the portfolio: principles for practice, theory and research. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
    Hamp-Lyons, L., and Heasley, B. (1987). Study writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching. Harlow: Pearson Education
    Hawisher, G., and Selfe, C. (eds.). (1989). Critical perspectives on computers and composition instruction. New York: Teachers' College Press
    Heath, S. B. (1991). The sense of being literate: historical and cross-cultural features. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosentahl, and P. Pearson (eds.), Handbook of reading research, vol. I (pp. 3–25). New York: Longman
    Hedgcock, J., and Lefkowitz, N. (1992). Collaborative oral/aural revision in foreign language writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 255–76
    Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the language classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Henry, A., and Roseberry, R. (2001). A narrow-angled corpus analysis of moves and strategies of the genre: “letter of application.”English for Specific Purposes, 20(2), 153–67
    Hinds, J. (1987). Reader versus writer responsibility: A new typology. In U. Connor and R. B. Kaplan (eds.), Writing across languages: analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
    Hinkel, E. (ed.). (1999). Culture in second language teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Hitchcock, G., and Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the teacher. London: Routledge
    Hoey, M. (1983). On the surface of discourse. London: Allen & Unwin
    Holliday, A. (1994). Appropriate methodology and social context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Holliday, A., and Cook, T. (1982). An ecological approach to ESP. Issues in ESP. Lancaster Papers in ELT, 5, 123–43
    Holst, J. K. (1993). Writ 101: Writing English. Wellington, NZ: Victoria University
    Hopkins, D. (1993). A teacher's guide to classroom research. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press
    Hughes, A. (1989). Testing for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Hunt, K. (1983). Sentence combining and the teaching of writing. In M. Martlew (ed.), The psychology of written language: a developmental approach (pp. 99–125). New York: Wiley
    Hutchison, T., and Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Hyland, F. (1998). The impact of teacher-written feedback on individual writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 7(3), 255–86
    Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: giving more autonomy to learners. Language Teaching Research, 4(1): 33–54
    Hyland, F. (2001). Providing effective support: investigating feedback to distance language learners. Open Learning, 16(3), 233–47
    Hyland, F., and Hyland, K. (2001). Sugaring the pill: praise and criticism in written feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 185–212
    Hyland, K. (1990). Providing productive feedback. ELT Journal, 44(4), 279–85
    Hyland, K. (1993). ESL computer writers: what can we do to help? System, 21(1), 21–30
    Hyland, K. (1994). The learning styles of Japanese students. JALT Journal, 16(1), 55–74
    Hyland, K. (1998). Hedging in scientific research articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
    Hyland, K. (1999). Talking to students: metadiscourse in introductory textbooks. English for Specific Purposes, 18(1), 3–26
    Hyland, K. (2000). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. London: Longman
    Hyland, K. (2002). Genre: language, context and literacy. In M. McGroaty (ed.), Annual review of applied linguistics, vol. 22: 113–35
    Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: a social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing 12(1), 17–29
    Janopoulos, M. (1992). University faculty tolerance of NS and NNS writing errors. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 109–22
    Jenkins, S., Jordan, M., and Weiland, P. (1993). The role of writing in graduate engineering education: a survey of faculty beliefs and practices. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 51–67
    Johns, A. M. (1997). Text, role and context: developing academic literacies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Johnson, K., and Johnson, G. (1999). Teachers understanding teaching. Boston: Heinle & Heinle
    Jolly, D., and Bolitho, R. (1998). A framework for materials writing. In B. Tomlinson (ed.), Materials development in language teaching (pp. 90–115). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Jordan, B. (1990). Academic writing course. London: Collins
    Kachru, Y. (1996). Culture in rhetorical styles: contrastive rhetoric and world Englishes. In N. Mercer and J. Swann (eds.), Learning English: development and diversity (pp. 305–14). London: Routledge
    Kahtani, S. (1999). Electronic portfolios in ESL writing: an alternative approach. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 12, 261–68
    Kaplan, R. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1–20
    Kaplan, R. (1987). Cultural thought patterns revisited. In U. Connor and R. Kaplan (eds.), Writing across languages. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
    Kaplan, R., and Shaw, P. (1983). Exploring academic discourse. Singapore: HarperCollins
    Knapp, P., and Watkins, M. (1994). Context-text-grammar: teaching the genres and grammar of school writing in infants and primary classrooms. Sydney: Text productions
    Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., Honan, E., and Crawford, J. (1998). The wired world of second language education. In I. Snyder (ed.), Page to Screen: taking literacy into the electronic era (pp. 20–50). London: Routledge
    Knoblauch, C., and Brannon, L. (1981). Teacher commentary on student writing: the state of the art. Freshman English News, 10, 1–4
    Knoblauch, C., and Brannon, L. (1984). Rhetorical traditions and the teaching of writing. Upper Montclair, NJ: Boynton/Cook
    Kramsch, C. (1993). Context and culture in language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Krapels, A. (1990). An overview of second language writing process research. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: insights for the writing classroom (pp. 37–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Krashen, S. (1993). The power of reading: insights from the research. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited
    Kroll, B. (2002). Considerations for teaching an ESL/EFL writing course. In M. Celce-Murcia (ed.), Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language (3rd ed.). Boston: Heinle & Heinle
    Kroll, B., and Reid, J. (1994). Guidelines for designing writing prompts: clarifications, caveats and cautions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 231–55
    Lankshear, C., and Snyder, I. (2000). Teachers and techno-literacy. St. Leonards, Australia: Allen & Unwin
    Lantolf, J. P. (1999). Second culture acquisition: cognitive considerations. In E. Hinkel (ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 28–46). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Larsen-Freeman, D., and Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. London: Longman
    Lave, J., and Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Leki, I. (1990). Coaching from the margins: issues in written response. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: insights from the language classroom (pp. 57–68). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Leki, I. (1992). UnderstandingESLwriters: a guide for teachers. Portsmouth, NH: Boynton/Cook
    Leki, I., and Carson, J. (1997). Completely different worlds: EAP and the writing experiences of ESL students in university courses. TESOL Quarterly, 31: 231–55
    Lock, G., and Lockhart, C. (1999). Genres in an academic writing class. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 47–64
    Lockhart, C., and Ng, P. (1995). Analysing talk in peer response groups: stances, functions and content. Language Learning, 45, 605–55
    Macken-Horarik, M. (1996). Construing the invisible: specialized literacy practices in junior secondary English. Ph. D. thesis: University of Sydney
    Macken-Horarik, M. (2002). “Something to shoot for”: a Systemic Functional approach to teaching genre in secondary school science. In A. Johns (ed.), Genre in the classroom: multiple perspectives (pp. 21–46). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
    Mager, R. (1975). Preparing instructional objectives. Palo Alto: Fearon
    Markus, H., and Kitayama, S. (1991). Cultures and the self: implications for cognition, emotion and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–53
    Martin, J. R. (1989). Factual writing: exploring and challenging social reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Martin, J. R. (1992). English text: system and structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
    Master, P. (1995). Consciousness raising and article pedagogy. In D. Belcher and G. Braine (eds.), Academic writing in a second language (pp. 183–205). Norwood, NJ: Ablex
    Mauranen, A. (1993). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English Economics Texts. English for Specific Purposes, 12, 3–22
    McCarthey, S. J. (1992). The teacher, the author, and the text: variations in form and content of writing conferences. Journal of Reading Behaviour, 24(1), 51–82
    McDonough, J., and McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. London: Arnold
    McDonough, J., and Shaw, C. (eds.). (1993). Materials and methods inELT. Oxford: Blackwell
    McNamara, T. (1996). Measuring second language performance. London: Longman
    Mendoca, C., and Johnson, K. (1994). Peer review negotiations; revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745–68
    Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In R. Linn (ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed.) (pp. 13–103). New York: Macmillan
    Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 241–56
    Miles, M. and Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    Milton, J. (1997). Providing computerized self-access opportunities for the development of writing skills. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 204–14). London: Longman
    Milton, J. (1999a). Lexical thickets and electronic gateways: making text accessible by novice writers. In C. N. Candlin and K. Hyland (eds.), Writing: texts, processes and practices (pp. 221–43). London: Longman
    Milton, J. (1999b). WordPilot 2000 (Computer program). Hong Kong: CompuLang
    Mittan, R. (1989). The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power. In D. Johnson and D. Roen (eds.), Richness in writing: empoweringESLstudents (pp. 207–19). New York: Longman
    Moffett, J. (1982). Writing, inner speech and mediation. College English, 44, 231–44
    Mohan, B. (1986). Language and content. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
    Murray, D. (1985). A writer teaches writing (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin
    Nation, P. (1990). Teaching and learning vocabulary. New York: Heinle & Heinle
    Nelson, J. (1993). The library revisited: exploring students' research processes. In A. Penrose and B. Sitcoe (eds.), Hearing ourselves think: cognitive research in the college writing classroom. New York: Oxford University Press
    Newkirk, T. (1995). The writing conference as performance. Research in the Teaching of English, 29, 193–215
    Nunan, D. (1989). Designing tasks for the communicative classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    O'Keefe, J. (2000). Invitation to reading and writing. Englewood Cliffe, NJ: Prentice Hall
    Ohta, A. (2000). Rethinking interaction in SLA: developmentally appropriate assistance in the zone of proximal development and the acquisition of L2 grammar. In J. Lantolf (ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Oshima, A., and Hogue, A. (1999). Writing academic English (3rd ed.). London: Longman
    Oxford, R., and Anderson, N. (1995). A crosscultural view of learning styles. Language Teaching, 28(201–15)
    Oxford, R., Hollaway, M., and Horton-Murillo, D. (1992). Language learning styles: Research and practical considerations for teaching in the multicultural tertiary ESL/EFL classroom. System, 4, 439–56
    Paltridge, B. (2001). Genre and the language learning classroom. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
    Partington, A. (1998). Patterns and meanings: using corpora for English language research and teaching. Amsterdam: Benjamins
    Patthey-Chavez, G., and Ferris, D. (1997). Writing conferences and the weaving of multi-voiced texts in college composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 31, 51–90
    Pemberton, R., and Toogood, S. (2001). Expectations and assumptions in a self-directed language-learning programme. In M. Mozzon-McPherson and R. Vismans (eds.), Beyond language teaching towards language advising. London: CILT
    Pemberton, R., Toogood, S. Ho, S., and Lam, J. (Forthcoming). Learner and advisor expectations in a self-directed language-learning programme: a case study of four learners and four advisers. In D. Bickerton and M. Gottin (eds.), 5thCercleS Conference Proceedings
    Pennington, M. C. (1993). A critical examination of word processing effects in relation to L2 writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 2, 227–55
    Pennington, M. (1996). The computer and the non-native writer: a natural partnership. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton
    Pennington, M., and Brock, M. (1989). Use of computers in the teaching of ESL writing: effectiveness of text analysis and word processing. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 8(1), 155–83
    Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others' words: text, ownership, memory and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 201–30
    Peyton, J. K., and Staton, J. (eds.). (1993). Dialogue journals in the multilingual classroom: building language fluency and writing skills through written interaction. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
    Phillipson, R. (1992). Linguistic imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Phinney, M. (1991). Computer assisted writing and writing apprehension in ESL students. In P. Dunkel (ed.), Computer assisted language learning and testing: Research issues and practices. New York: Newbury House
    Polio, C. (2003). An overview of what we investigate and how. In B. Kroll (ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing. New York: Cambridge University Press
    Pratt, D. (1980). Curriculum design and development. New York: Harcourt Brace
    Purves, A. C. (ed.). (1988). Writing across languages and cultures: Issues in contrastive rhetoric. Newbury Park, CA: Sage
    Purves, A., Quattrini, J., and Sullivan, C. (eds.). (1995). Creating the writing portfolio. Lincolnwood, IL: NTC Publishing
    Radecki, P., and Swales, J. (1988). ESL student reaction to written comments on their written work. System, 16, 355–65
    Raimes, A. (1991). Out of the woods: emerging traditions in the teaching of writing. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 407–30
    Raimes, A. (1992). Exploring through writing: a process approach toESLcomposition (2nd ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press
    Ramanathan, V., and Atkinson, D. (1999). Individualism, academic writing and ESL writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 45–75
    Reid, J. M. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(1), 87–109
    Reid, J. M. (1993). TeachingESLwriting. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Regents/Prentice Hall
    Reid, J. M. (1994). Responding to ESL students' texts: the myths of appropriation. TESOL Quarterly, 28, 237–92
    Reid, J. M. (2000). The process of composition (3rd ed.). New York: Longman
    Reid, J., and Kroll, B. (1995). Designing and assessing effective classroom writing assignments for NES and ESL students. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(1), 17–41
    Richards, J. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Richards, J., and Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Riley, P. (1997). The guru and the conjurer: aspects of counselling for self-access. In P. Benson and P. Voller (eds.), Autonomy and independence in language learning (pp. 114–31). London: Longman
    Rothery, J. (1986). Teaching writing in the primary school: a genre-based approach to the development of writing abilities. Working Papers in Linguistics: University of Sydney
    Rowntree, K. (1991). Writing for success: A practical guide for New Zealand students. Auckland: Longman
    Sawyer, W., and Watson, K. (1987). Questions of genre. In I. Reid (ed.), The place of genre in learning: current debates. Deakin: Deakin University Press
    Schriver, K. (1992). Teaching writers to anticipate readers' needs. Written Communication, 9(2), 179–208
    Seal, B. (1997). Academic encounters: content focus human behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Sheldon, L. (1987). ELTtextbooks and materials: problems in evaluation and development. London: Modern English Pubs and British Council
    Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: developments, issues, and directions. In B. Kroll (ed.), Second language writing: research insights for the classroom (pp. 11–23). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: the ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 665–77
    Silva, T. (1997). Differences in ESL and Native-English-Speaker writing: the research and its implications. In C. Severino, J. Guena, and J. Butler (eds.), Writing in multicultural settings (pp. 209–19). New York: Modern Language Association of America
    Silva, T., Leki, I., and Carson, J. (1997). Broadening the perspective of mainstream composition studies: some thought from the disciplinary margins. Written Communication, 14, 398–428
    Silva, T., and Reichelt, M. (2003). Second language writing up close and personal: some success stories. In B. Kroll (ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 93–114). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Skehan, P. (1989). Individual differences in second language learning. London: Edward Arnold
    Smagorinsky, P. (ed). (1994). Speaking about writing: reflections on research methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    Snyder, I. (1993). Writing with word processors: a research overview. Educational Research, 35, 49–68
    Snyder, I. (ed). (1998). Page to screen: taking literacy into the electronic era. London: Routledge
    Sommers, N. (1982). Responding to student writing. College Composition and Communication, 33, 148–56
    Spack, R. (1996). Guidelines (2nd ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press
    Stake, R. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    Stoddard, B., and MacArthur, C. (1993). A peer editor strategy: guiding learning disabled students in response and revision. Research in the Teaching of English, 27(1), 76–103
    Stratman, J., and Hamp-Lyons, L. (1994). Reactivity in concurrent think-aloud protocols: issues for research. In P. Smagorinsky (ed.), Speaking about writing (pp. 89–112). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
    Straub, R. (2000). The student, the text, and the classroom context: a case study of student response. Assessing Writing, 7, 23–55
    Susser, B. (1998). The mysterious disappearance of word processing. Computers and Composition, 15, 347–71
    Swaffer, J., Romano S., Markley, P., and Arens, K. (eds.). (1998). Language learning online. Austin, TX: Labyrinth
    Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Swales, J., and Feak, C. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students: essential tasks and skills. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
    Swales, J., and Feak, C. (2000). English in today's research world: a writing guide. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press
    Taylor, T., and Ward, I. (eds.). (1998). Literacy theory in the age of the Internet. New York: Columbia University Press
    Tomlinson, B. (ed.). (1998). Materials development in language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Tribble, C. (1996). Writing. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Tribble, C., and Jones, G. (1997). Concordances in the classroom. Houston, TX: Athelstan
    Truscott, J. (1996). The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes. Language Learning, 46, 327–69
    Tyler, R. (1949). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. New York: Harcourt Brace
    Tyner, K. (ed.). (1998). Literacy in a digital world: teaching and learning in the age of information. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum
    Ur, P. (1996). A course in language teaching: practice and theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Valero-Garces, C. (1996). Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Spanish-English Economics texts. English for Specific Purposes, 15(4), 279–94
    Vanett, L., and Jurich, D. (1990). A context for collaboration: teachers and students writing together. In J. K. Peyton (ed.), Students and teachers writing together (pp. 51–62). Alexandria, VA: TESOL
    Villamil, O., and Guerrero, M. (1996). Peer revision in the L2 classroom: social-cognitive activities, mediating strategies, and aspects of social behaviour. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5, 51–75
    Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. In M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, and E. Souberman (eds.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
    Walker, R. (1996). Doing research: a handbook for teachers. London: Routledge
    Wall, D. (1997). Impact and washback in language testing. In C. Clapham (ed.), The Kluwer encyclopedia of language in education, vol. 7: testing and assessment. Dordrecht: Kluwer
    Wallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Warschauer, M. (1995). E-mail for English teaching: bringing the Internet and computer learning networks into the language classroom. Alexandria, VA: Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages
    Warschauer, M. (2002). Networking into academic discourse. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1: 45–58
    Warschauer, M., and Kern, R. (eds.). (2000). Network-based language teaching: concepts and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    Watson-Reekie, C. (1982). The use and abuse of models in the ESL writing class. TESOL Quarterly, 16, 5–14
    Weigle, S. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
    White, E. (1994). Teaching and assessing writing (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
    White, R., and Arndt, V. (1991). Process writing. Harlow, UK: Longman
    Wichmann, A., Fligelstone, S., McEnery, T., and Knowles, G. (eds.). (1997). Teaching and language corpora. London: Longman
    Windeatt, S., Hardisty, D., and Eastment, D. (2000). The Internet. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Wright, T. (1987). Roles of teachers and learners. Oxford: Oxford University Press
    Wu, M. H. (1992). Towards a contextual lexico-grammar: An application of concordance analysis in EST teaching. RELC Journal, 23(2), 18–34
    Yalden, J. (1987). The communicative syllabus. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
    Zamel, V. (1983). The composing processes of advanced ESL students: six case studies. TESOL Quarterly, 17, 165–87
    Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 79–101
    Zamel, V. (1997). Towards a model of transculturation. TESOL Quarterly, 31, 341–52
    Zhang, S. (1995). Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4, 209–22

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.