Securing American Elections: How Data-Driven Election Monitoring Can Improve Our Democracy

R. Michael Alvarez; Nicholas Adams-Cohen; Seo-young Silvia Kim; Yimeng Li

doi:10.1017/9781108887359

References

Adams-Cohen, N. J., Hao, C., Jia, C., Matschke, N., & Alvarez, R. M. (2017). Election monitoring using Twitter (Working Paper No. 129). California Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://vote.caltech.edu/working-papers/129

Alvarez, R. M., Atkeson, L. R., & Hall, T. E. (2012a). Confirming elections: Creating confidence and integrity through election auditing. Palgrave Macmillan.

Alvarez, R. M., Atkeson, L. R., & Hall, T. E. (2012b). Evaluating elections: A handbook of methods and standards. Cambridge University Press. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139226547

Alvarez, R. M., Atkeson, L. R., Levin, I., & Li, Y. (2019). Paying attention to inattentive survey respondents. Political Analysis, 27(2), 145–162. doi: 10.1017/pan.2018.57

Alvarez, R. M., Cao, J., and Li, Y. (2020). Voter experiences, perceptions of fraud, and voter confidence (Working Paper No. 139). Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project. Retrieved from http://vote.caltech.edu/working-papers/139.

Alvarez, R. M., & Hall, T. E. (2006). Controlling democracy: The principal– agent problems in election administration. Policy Studies Journal, 34(4), 491–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00188.x

Alvarez, R. M., Hall, T. E., and Llewellyn, M. H. (2008). Are Americans confident their ballots are counted? The Journal of Politics 70(3), 754–766.

Alvarez, R. M., Katz, G., & Pomares, J. (2011). The impact of new technologies on voter confidence in Latin America: Evidence from e-voting experiments in Argentina and Colombia. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 8(2), 199–217.

Alvarez, R. M., & Katz, J. N. (2008). The case of the 2002 general election. In Alvarez, R. M., Hall, T. E., & Hyde, S. D. (Eds.), Election fraud: Detecting and deterring electoral manipulation (pp. 149–162). Brookings Institution Press.

Alvarez, R. M., Katz, J. N., Hill, S. A., & Hartman, E. K. (2012). Machines versus humans: The counting and recounting of prescored punchcard ballots. In Alvarez, R. M., Atkeson, L. R., & Hall, T. E. (Eds.), Confirming elections: Creating confidence and integrity through election auditing (pp. 73–88). Palgrave Macmillan.

Alvarez, R. M., & Schousen, M. M. (1993). Policy moderation or conflicting expectations: Testing the international models of split-ticket voting. American Politics Quarterly, 21(4), 410–438.

Ansolabehere, S., & Hersh, E. (2010). The quality of voter registration records: A state-by-state analysis. Report, Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project. http://www.vote.caltech.edu/reports/6

Ansolabehere, S., & Hersh, E. (2014). Voter registration: The process and quality of lists. In Burden, Barry C. and Stewart, Charles III (Eds.), The measure of American elections (pp. 61–90). Cambridge University Press. https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=mTADBAAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PR13&dq=the+measure+of+american+elections&ots=Fo-4IxJi5-&sig=mr-EoL99n3vESByjQCzsRo9rPv8#v=onepage&q=the%20measure%20of%20american%20elections&f=false

Ansolabehere, S., & Hersh, E. (2017). ADGN: An algorithm for record linkage using address, date of birth, gender, and name. Statistics and Public Policy, 4(1), 1–10.

Atkeson, L. R., Alvarez, R. M., & Hall, T. E. (2015). Voter confidence: How to measure it and how it differs from government support. Election Law Journal: Rules, Politics, and Policy, 14(3), 207–219. doi: 10.1089/elj.2014.0293

Atkeson, L. R., & Saunders, K. L. (2007). The effect of election administration on voter confidence: A local matter? PS: Political Science and Politics, 40(4), 655–660. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/20452045.

Barberá, P. (2015). Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political Analysis, 23(1), 76–91.

Beauchamp, N. (2017). Predicting and interpolating state-level polls using Twitter textual data. American Journal of Political Science, 61(2), 490–503.

Beber, B., & Scacco, A. (2012). What the numbers say: A digit-based test for election fraud. Political Analysis, 20(2), 211–234.

Benoit, K., & Nulty, P. (2016). quanteda: Quantitative analysis of textual data [Computer software manual]. Retrieved from http://github.com/kbenoit/quanteda (R package version 0.9.1–11)

Berinsky, A. J., Margolis, M. F., & Sances, M. W. (2014). Separating the shirkers from the workers? Making sure respondents pay attention on self-administered surveys. American Journal of Political Science, 58(3), 739–753. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12081

Bessi, A., & Ferrara, E. (2016). Social bots distort the 2016 US presidential election online discussion. First Monday, 21(11).

Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Jan.), 993–1022.

Breuninger, K. (2018, November). Missing power cords, foreclosures: Here’s where voters are running into problems at the polls. CNBC. Retrieved from www.cnbc.com/2018/11/06/heres-where-voters-are-running-into-problems-at-the-polls.html

Burden, B. C., & Kimball, D. C. (2002). Why Americans split their tickets: Campaigns, competition, and divided government. University of Michigan Press.

Burnap, P., Gibson, R., Sloan, L., Southern, R., & Williams, M. (2016). 140 characters to victory? Using Twitter to predict the UK 2015 general election. Electoral Studies, 41, 230–233.

Campbell, A., Converse, P., Miller, W., & Stokes, D. (1980). The American Voter. University of Chicago Press.

Cantú, F., & Saiegh, S. M. (2011). Fraudulent democracy? An analysis of Argentina’s infamous decade using supervised machine learning. Political Analysis, 19(4), 409–433.

Ceron, A., Curini, L., & Iacus, S. M. (2015). Using sentiment analysis to monitor electoral campaigns: Method matters – evidence from the United States and Italy. Social Science Computer Review, 33(1), 3–20.

Chandola, V., Banerjee, A., & Kumar, V. (2009). Anomaly detection: A survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 41(3), 15.

Christen, P. (2012). Data matching: Concepts and techniques for record linkage, entity resolution, and duplicate detection. Springer Science & Business Media.

Christen, P. (2014). Preparation of a real temporal voter data set for record linkage and duplicate detection research (Tech. Rep.). The Australian National University. Retrieved from http://users.cecs.anu.edu.au/~Peter.Christen/publications/ncvoter-report-29june2014.pdf

Cohen, W., Ravikumar, P., & Fienberg, S. (2003). A comparison of string metrics for matching names and records. In Proceedings of the KDD-2003 Workshop on Data Cleaning, Record Linkage, and Object Consolidation Washington, DC, August, 2003 (Vol. 3, pp. 73–78).

Conover, M. D., Ratkiewicz, J., Francisco, M., Goncalves, B., Menczer, F., & Flammini, A. (2011). Political polarization on Twitter. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on weblogs and social media. Barcelona, Spain: AAAI.

Deville, J.-C., & Sarndal, C.-E. (1992). Calibration estimators in survey sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 87(418), 376–382. Retrieved from www.jstor.org/stable/2290268 doi: 10.2307/2290268

Dreyfuss, E. (2018, November). Georgia voting machine issues heighten scrutiny on Brian Kemp. Wired.

Enamorado, T., Fifield, B., & Imai, K. (2018). Using a probabilistic model to assist merging of large-scale administrative records. American Political Science Review, 1–19.

Epstein, R. J. (2018, August 22). Republican Troy Balderson declared winner in tight Ohio special election. The Wall Street Journal.

Fellegi, I. P., & Sunter, A. B. (1969). A theory for record linkage. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 64(328), 1183–1210.

Ferrara, E. (2017). Disinformation and social bot operations in the run up to the 2017 French presidential election. CoRR, abs/1707.00086. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00086

Gerken, H. (2009). The democracy index: Why our election system is failing and how to fix it. Princeton University Press.

Golbeck, J., Grimes, J. M., & Rogers, A. (2010). Twitter use by the US Congress. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(8), 1612–1621.

Graham, T., Jackson, D., & Broersma, M. (2016). New platform, old habits? Candidates’ use of Twitter during the 2010 British and Dutch general election campaigns. New Media & Society, 18(5), 765–783.

Groves, R. M., Presser, S., & Dipko, S. (2004). The role of topic interest in survey participation decisions. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 68(1), 2–31.

Hall, J. L. (2008a). Improving the security, transparency, and efficiency of California’s 1% manual tally procedures. 2008 USENIX/ACCURATE Electronic Voting Technology Workshop. Retrieved from www.usenix.org/legacy/events/evt08/tech/full_papers/hall/hall.pdf

Hall, J. L. (2008b). Procedures for California’s 1% manual tally. Retrieved from https://josephhall.org/procedures/ca_tally_procedures-2008.pdf.

Hecht, B., Hong, L., Suh, B., & Chi, E. H. (2011). Tweets from Justin Bieber’s heart: The dynamics of the location field in user profiles. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems (pp. 237–246). New York, NY, USA: ACM.

Hernández, M. A., & Stolfo, S. J. (1995). The merge/purge problem for large databases. ACM SIGMOD Record, 24, pp. 127–138.

Herzog, T. N., Scheuren, F., & Winkler, W. E. (2010). Record linkage. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Computational Statistics, 2(5), 535–543.

Herzog, T. N., Scheuren, F. J., & Winkler, W. E. (2007). Data quality and record linkage techniques. Springer Science & Business Media.

Howard, P. N., Kollanyi, B., Bolsover, G., Bradshaw, S., & Neudert, L. -M. (2017). Junk news and bots during the US election: What were Michigan voters sharing over Twitter? COMPROP Data Memo, 3.

Ikawa, Y., Enoki, M., & Tatsubori, M. (2012). Location inference using microblog messages. In Proceedings of the 21st international conference on world wide web (pp. 687–690). New York, NY, USA: ACM.

Jaro, M. A. (1989). Advances in record-linkage methodology as applied to matching the 1985 census of Tampa, Florida. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 84(406), 414–420.

Key, V. O. (1984). Southern politics in state and nation: A new edition. The University of Tennessee Press.

Kim, S., Schneider, S., & Alvarez, R. M. (2019). Evaluating the quality of changes in voter registration databases. American Politics Research. doi: 10.1177/1532673X19870512

King, G., Lam, P., & Roberts, M. E. (2017). Computer-assisted keyword and document set discovery from unstructured text. American Journal of Political Science, 61(4), 971–988.

Klasnja, M., Barberá, P., Beauchamp, N., Nagler, J., & Tucker, J. (2018). Measuring public opinion with social media data. In Atkeson, L. R. & Alvarez, R. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of polling and survey methods. Oxford University Press.

Kumar, S., Morstatter, F., & Liu, H. (2015). Analyzing Twitter data. In Mejova, Y., Weber, I., & Macy, M. W. (Eds.), Twitter: A digital socioscope (pp. 21–51). Cambridge University Press.

Levenshtein, V. I. (1966). Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. In Soviet Physics Doklady, 707–710.

Levin, I., Pomares, J., & Alvarez, R. M. (2016). Using machine learning algorithms to detect election fraud. In Alvarez, R. M. (Ed.), Computational social science: Discovery and prediction (pp. 266–294). Cambridge University Press.

Li, C., & Sun, A. (2014). Fine-grained location extraction from tweets with temporal awareness. In Proceedings of the 37th international ACM SIGIR conference on research & development in information retrieval (pp. 43–52). New York, NY, USA: ACM.

Lin, Y., Keegan, B., Margolin, D., & Lazer, D. (2013). Rising tides or rising stars? Dynamics of shared attention on Twitter during media events. CoRR, abs/1307.2785. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1307.2785

Lindeman, M., & Stark, P. B. (2012). A gentle introduction to risk-limiting audits. IEEE Security and Privacy, Special Issue on Electronic Voting. Retrieved from https://www.stat.berkeley.edu/~stark/Preprints/gentle12.pdf

Liu, A., Srikanth, M., Adams-Cohen, N., Alvarez, R. M., & Anandkumar, A. (2019). Finding social media trolls: Dynamic keyword selection methods for rapidly-evolving online debates. doi: http://dx.doi.org/abs/1911.05332

McGee, J., Caverlee, J., & Cheng, Z. (2013). Location prediction in social media based on tie strength. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on information & knowledge management (pp. 459–468). New York, NY, USA: ACM.

McKinney, S. M., Houston, J. B., & Hawthorne, J. (2013). Social watching a 2012 Republican presidential primary debate. American Behavioral Scientist, 58, 556–573.

Mebane, W. R. (2008). Election forensics: The second-digit Benford’s law test and recent American presidential elections. In Alvarez, R. M., Hall, T. E., & Hyde, S. D. (Eds.), Election fraud: Detecting and deterring electoral manipulation (pp. 162–181). Brookings Institution Press.

Mebane, W. R. (2011). Comment on “Benford’s law and the detection of election fraud.” Political Analysis, 19(3), 269–272.

Montgomery, J. M., Olivella, S., Potter, J. D., & Crisp, B. F. (2015). An informed forensics approach to detecting vote irregularities. Political Analysis, 23(4), 488–505. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpv023

Murthy, D. (2015). Twitter and elections: Are tweets, predictive, reactive, or a form of buzz? Information, Community & Society, 18(7), 816–831.

Myakgov, M., Ordeshook, P. C., & Shaikin, D. (2009). The forensics of election fraud. Cambridge University Press.

Newcombe, H. B., Kennedy, J. M., Axford, S., & James, A. P. (1959). Automatic linkage of vital records. Science, 130, (3381) 954–959.

O’Connor, B., Balasubramanyan, R., & Routledge, B. R. (2010). From tweets to polls: Linking text sentiment to public opinion time series. In Proceedings of the fourth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media. Washington, DC: AAAI.

Orange County Registrar of Voters. (2018). Register to vote, or change your name, address or party. Retrieved from www.ocvote.com/registration/register-to-vote/

Orange County Registrar of Voters. (2019). Orange county registrar of voters 2018 risk limiting audit pilot project report. Retrieved from https://bit.ly/2YYTBbX

Roberts, M. E., Stewart, B. M., Tingley, D., et al. (2014). Structural topic models for open-ended survey responses. American Journal of Political Science, 58(4), 1064–1082. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12103

Rozenas, A. (2017). Detecting election fraud from irregularities in vote-share distributions. Political Analysis, 25(1), 41–56. doi: 10.1017/pan.2016.9

Sajuria, J., & Fabrega, J. (2016). Do we need polls? Why Twitter will not replace opinion surveys, but can complement them. In Snee, H., Hine, C., Morey, Y., Roberts, S., & Watson, H. (Eds.), Digital methods for social science: An interdisciplinary guide to research innovation (pp. 87–104). Palgrave Macmillan.

Särndal, C.-E., & Lundström, S. (2005). Estimation in surveys with nonresponse. John Wiley & Sons.

Schuman, H., & Presser, S. (1996). Questions and answers in attitude surveys: Experiments on question form, wording, and context. SAGE Publications.

Selker, T. (2005). Election auditing is an end-to-end procedure. Science, 308(5730), 1873–1874.

Stark, P. B. (2009). Risk-limiting postelection audits: Conservative p-values from common probability inequalities. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 4(4), 1005–1014.

Steinert-Threkeld, Z. C. (2018). Twitter as data. Cambridge University Press.

Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z., Popa, S. A., & Parnet, O. (2016). A bad workman blames his tweets: The consequences of citizens’ uncivil Twitter. Journal of Communication, 66(6), 1007–1031.

Vallis, O., Hochenbaum, J., & Kejariwal, A. (2014). A novel technique for long-term anomaly detection in the cloud. In 6th USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing (HotCloud 14). Philadelphia, PA. Retrieved from www.usenix.org/conference/hotcloud14/workshop-program/presentation/vallis

Vosoughi, S. (2015). Automatic detection and verification of rumors on Twitter. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Williams, V. (2018, November 29). Lawsuit by Abrams PAC continues debate over voter suppression in bitter Georgia governor’s race. The Washington Post. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/politics/lawsuit-alleges-voter-suppression-in-bitter-georgia-governors-race-and-seeks-protections-for-future-races/2018/11/29/750afc20-f353-11e8-aeea-b85fd44449f5_story.html

Winkler, W. E. (1988). Using the em algorithm for weight computation in the Fellegi–Sunter model of record linkage. In Proceedings of the section on survey research methods, American Statistical Association (Vol. 667, p. 671).

Winkler, W. E. (1990). String comparator metrics and enhanced decision rules in the Fellegi–Sunter model of record linkage. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods American Statistical Association. (pp. 354–359).

Winkler, W. E., & Thibaudeau, Y. (1991). An application of the Fellegi–Sunter model of record linkage to the 1990 US Decennial Census. US Bureau of the Census, 1–22.

Yancey, W. E. (2005). Evaluating string comparator performance for record linkage. Technical Report RR2005/05, US Bureau of the Census.

Zhang, M., Alvarez, R. M., & Levin, I. (2019). Election forensics: Using machine learning and synthetic data for possible election anomaly detection. PLoS ONE, 14. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0223950

Securing American Elections

How Data-Driven Election Monitoring Can Improve Our Democracy

This Element has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.

Book description

References

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Book summary page views

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

Accessibility Information