Adams, R., “God, Possibility and Kant,” Faith and Philosophy 17/4 (2000), pp. 425–440.
Al-Azm, S., The Origins of Kant’s Arguments in the Antinomies. Oxford University Press, 1972.
Allison, H., Kant’s Theory of Freedom. Cambridge University Press, 1990.
Allison, H., Transcendental Idealism: Interpretation and Defence. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983.
Altmann, A., “Moses Mendelssohn on Leibniz and Spinoza,” in Altmann, Studies in Religious Philosophy and Mysticism. London: Routledge, 1969.
Ameriks, K., Interpreting Kant’s Critiques. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2003.
Ameriks, K., Kant and the Fate of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press, 2000.
Ameriks, K., Kant’s Theory of Mind, 2nd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2000.
Ayer, A. J., Language, Truth, and Logic. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1971.
Barbaras, F., Spinoza: La science mathématique du salut. Paris: CNRS, 2007.
Beiser, F., Enlightenment, Revolution, and Romanticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992.
Beiser, F., The Fate of Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1987.
Beiser, F., Hegel. London: Routledge, 2005.
Beiser, F., “Hegel and the Problem of Metaphysics,” in Beiser (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Hegel. Cambridge University Press, 1993, pp. 1–25.
Bell, D., Spinoza in Germany from 1670 to the Age of Goethe. London: Institute of Germanic Studies, University of London, 1984.
Bennett, J., A Study of Spinoza’s Ethics. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1984.
Boehm, O., “The first Antinomy and Spinoza,” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 19/4 (2011), pp. 683–710.
Boehm, O., “Kant and Spinoza Debating the Third Antinomy,” in M. Della Rocca (ed.), The Oxford Handbook to Spinoza. Oxford University Press. Forthcoming.
Boehm, O., “Kant’s Regulative Spinozism,” Kant-Studien. Forthcoming.
Bollacher, M., Der junge Goethe und Spinoza. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer, 1969.
Brachtendorf, J., “Substanz, Subjekt, Sein: Die Spinozarezeption der frühen und der späten Wissenschaftslehre,” in G. Zöller and H. G. von Manz (eds.), Fichtes Spätwerk im Vergleich, Fichte-Studien 30. London and New York: Rodopi, 2006, pp. 57–70.
Bradley, F. H.Appearance and Reality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1968.
Brandom, R., Reason in Philosophy: Animating Ideas. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press, 2009.
Brandom, R., Tales of the Mighty Dead. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2002.
Brandt, R., The Philosophy of Schleiermacher. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1941.
Breazeale, D., “Fichte’s Aenesidemus Review and the Transformation of German Idealism,” Review of Metaphysics 34/3 (1981), pp. 545–568.
Cassirer, E., The Philosophy of the Enlightenment, trans. F. Koelln and J. Pettegrove. Princeton University Press, 1951.
Chignell, A., “Kant, Modality, and the Most Real Being,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91/2 (2009), pp. 157–192.
Cohen, H., “Deutschtum und Judentum,” in. H. Holzheyet al. (eds.), WerkeHildesheim: Olms, 1997.
Curley, E. M., Behind the Geometrical Method: A Reading of Spinoza’s Ethics. Princeton University Press, 1988.
Curley, E. M., Spinoza’s Metaphysics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1969.
Della Rocca, M., “Explaining Explanation and the Multiplicity of Attributes,” in M. Hampe and R. Schnepf (eds.), Baruch de Spinoza: Ethik in geometrischer Ordnung dargestellt. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 2006, pp. 17–35.
Della Rocca, M., “A Rationalist Manifesto: Spinoza and the Principle of Sufficient Reason,” Philosophical Topics 31 (2003), pp. 75–93.
Della Rocca, M., Representation and the Mind–Body Problem in Spinoza. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996.
Della Rocca, M., Spinoza. London: Routledge, 2008.
Della Rocca, M., “Violations of the Principle of Sufficient Reason in Leibniz and Spinoza,” in F. Correiea and B. Schneider (eds.), Metaphysical Grounding. Cambridge University Press, 2012.
Düsing, K., “Von der Substanz zum Subjekt: Hegels spekulative Spinoza-Deutung,” in M. Walther (ed.), Spinoza und der deutsche Idealismus. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2001, pp. 145–180.
Findlay, J. N., Hegel: A Re-Examination. London: Allen and Unwin, 1959.
Fischer, K., Geschichte der neueren Philosophie. Mannheim: Bassermann, 1854.
Fisher, M. and Watkins, E., “Kant on the Material Ground of Possibility: From the Only Possible Argument to the Critique of Pure Reason,” Review of Metaphysics 52/2 (1998), pp. 369–397.
Förster, E., The Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2012.
Forster, M. N.After Herder: Philosophy of Language in the German Tradition. Oxford University Press, 2010.
Forster, M. N. “Ursprung und Wesen des Hegelschen Geistbegriffs,” Hegel-Jahrbuch (2011), pp. 213–229.
Frank, M., “Einleitung,” in F. Schleiermacher, Dialectic, ed. Frank. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 2001.
Frank, M. and Kurz, G., “Einleitung,” in Materialien zu Schellings philosophischen Anfängen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1975.
Franks, P., All or Nothing: Systematicity, Transcendental Arguments, and Skepticism in German Idealism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2005.
Franks, P. and Gardner, S., “From Kant to Post-Kantian Idealism ii,” Aristotelian Society Supplementary 76 (2002), pp. 229–246.
Frege, G., The Foundations of Arithmetic, ed. J. L. Austin. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1996.
Gabbey, A., “Force and Inertia in the Seventeenth Century: Descartes and Newton,” in S. Gaukroger (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics, and Physics. Brighton: Harvest Press, 1980, pp. 230–320.
Garrett, D., “Spinoza on the Essence of the Human Body and the Part of the Mind that Is Eternal,” in O. Koistinen (ed.), The Cambridge Companion to Spinoza’s Ethics. Cambridge University Press, 2008, pp. 284–302.
Garrett, D., “Spinoza’s Conatus Argument,” in O. Koistinen and J. I. Biro (eds.), Spinoza: Metaphysical Themes. Oxford University Press, 2002, pp. 127–158.
Geach, P., “Spinoza and the Divine Attributes,” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement (1971), pp. 15–27.
Goldenbaum, U., “Die Commentatiuncula de judice als Leibnizens erste philosophische Auseinandersetzung mit Spinoza nebst der Mitteilung über ein neuaufgefundenes Leibnizstück,” Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft 29 (1999), pp. 61–97.
Goldenbaum, U., “Why Shouldn’t Leibniz Have Studied Spinoza? The Rise of the Claim of Continuity in Leibniz’ Philosophy Out of the Ideological Rejection of Spinoza’s Impact on Leibniz,” The Leibniz Review 17 (2007), pp. 107–140.
Görland, I., Die Entwicklung der Frühphilosophie Schellings in der Auseinandersetzung mit Fichte. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1973.
Grier, M., Kant’s Doctrine of Transcendental Illusion. Cambridge University Press, 2001.
Grün, K.-J., Das Erwachen der Materie: Studie über die spinozistischen Gehalte der Naturphilosophie Schellings. Hildesheim: Olms, 1993.
Guéroult, M., Spinoza i: Dieu (Ethique, i). Paris: Aubier-Montaigne, 1968.
Haag, J., Erfahrung und Gegenstand: Das Verhältnis von Sinnlichkeit und Verstand. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 2007.
Haag, J., “Spinoza über die Intentionalität geistiger Zustände,” Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 57 (2009), pp. 449–469.
Hampe, M., “Rationality as the Therapy of Self-Liberation in Spinoza’s Ethics,” in C. Carlisle and J. Ganeri (eds.), Philosophy as Therapeia. Cambridge University Press, 2010, pp. 35–49.
Hartmann, K., “Hegel: A Non-Metaphysical View,” in A. MacIntyre (ed.), Hegel: A Collection of Critical Essays. University of Notre Dame Press, 1972.
Haym, R., Herder nach seinem Leben und seinen Werken, 2 vols. Berlin: Gaertner, 1880.
Heimsoeth, H., “Le continu métaphysique de la Quatrième Antinomie de Kant,” in L. Beck, Y. Belaval, and S. L. Bruch (eds.), L’histoire de la philosophie: Ses problèmes, ses méthodes. Paris: Librairie Fischbacher, 1964.
Heman, F., “Kant und Spinoza,” Kant-Studien 5 (1901), pp. 273–339.
Henrich, D., “Fichtes ursprüngliche Einsicht,” in Henrich and H. Wagner (eds.), Subjektivität und Metaphysik: Festschrift für Wolfgang Cramer. Frankfurt am Main: Klostermann, 1966, pp. 188–232.
Henrich, D., Der Grund im Bewußtsein: Untersuchungen zu Hölderlins Denken (1794–1795). Stuttgart: Klett–Cotta, 1992.
Horstmann, R.-P., Ontologie und Relationen. Hain: Athenäum, 1984.
Horstmann, R.-P., “Schwierigkeiten und Voraussetzungen der dialektischen Philosophie Hegels,” in Horstmann (ed.), Seminar: Dialektik in der Philosophie Hegels. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1978, pp. 9–30.
Inwood, M., A Hegel Dictionary. Oxford: Blackwell, 1992.
Israel, J., Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650–1750. Oxford University Press, 2001.
Klein, J. R., “‘By Eternity I Understand’: Eternity According to Spinoza,” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 51 (2002), pp. 295–324.
Kreimendahl, L., Kant: Der Durchbruch von 1769. Köln: Dinter, 1990.
Kreines, J., “Hegel: Metaphysics without Pre-Critical Monism,” Bulletin of the Hegel Society of Great Britain (2008), pp. 48–70.
Kreines, J., “Hegel’s Metaphysics: Changing the Debate,” Philosophy Compass 1 (2006), pp. 466–480.
Lehmann, G., Geschichte der Philosophie: Die Philosophie des neunzehnten Jahrhunderts, 9 vols. Berlin: de Gruyter, 1953.
Lindner, H., Das Problem des Spinozismus im Schaffen Goethes und Herders. Weimar: Arion Verlag, 1960.
Logan, I., “Whatever Happened to Kant’s Ontological Argument?,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74/2 (2007), pp. 346–363.
Longuenesse, B., Hegel’s Critique of Metaphysics, trans. N. Simek. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Macherey, P., “Le Spinoza idéaliste de Hegel,” in M. Walther (ed.), Spinoza und der deutsche Idealismus. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann, 2001, pp. 145–161.
Mariña, J., Transformation of the Self in the Thought of Friedrich Schleiermacher. Oxford University Press, 2008.
Matheron, A., “Idée, idée de l’idée et certitude dans le Tractatus de intellectus emendatione,” in Groupe de Recherche Spinoziste (eds.), Travaux et documents 2: Méthode et métaphysique. Paris: Presses de l’Université de Paris Sorbonne, 1989, pp. 93–104.
Melamed, Y., “Acosmism or Weak Individuals? Hegel, Spinoza, and the Reality of the Finite,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (2010), pp. 77–92.
Melamed, Y., “The Building Blocks of Spinoza’s Metaphysics: Substance, Attributes, and Modes” in M. Della Rocca (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Spinoza (Oxford University Press). Forthcoming.
Melamed, Y., “On the Exact Science of Non-Beings: Spinoza’s View of Mathematics,” Iyyun: The Jerusalem Philosophical Quarterly 49 (2000), pp. 3–22.
Melamed, Y., Review of M. Ayers (ed.), Rationalism, Platonism, and God, Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, February 24, 2009.
Melamed, Y., “Salomon Maimon and the Rise of Spinozism in German Idealism,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (2004), pp. 79–80.
Melamed, Y., Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Substance and Thought. Oxford University Press, 2012.
Melamed, Y., “Spinoza’s Metaphysics of Substance: The Substance–Mode Relation as a Relation of Inherence and Predication,” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 78 (2009), pp. 17–82.
Melamed, Y., “Why Spinoza is Not an Eleatic Monist (Or Why Diversity Exists)” in Philip Goff (ed.), Spinoza on Monism (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2012), 206–222.
Moyar, D., Hegel’s Conscience. Oxford University Press, 2011.
Nadler, S., Spinoza’s Ethics: An Introduction. Cambridge University Press, 2006.
Nadler, S., Spinoza’s Heresy: Immortality and the Jewish Mind. Oxford University Press, 2001.
Nassar, D., “From a Philosophy of Self to a Philosophy of Nature: Goethe and the Development of Schelling’s Naturphilosophie,” Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 92/3 (2010), pp. 304–321.
Newlands, S., “More Recent Idealistic Readings of Spinoza,” Philosophy Compass 6 (2011), 109–119.
Newlands, S., “Thinking, Conceiving, and Idealism in Spinoza,” Archiv für Geschichte derPhilosophie (forthcoming).
Parkinson, G. H. R., “Hegel, Pantheism and Spinoza,” Journal of the History of Ideas 38 (1977), pp. 449–459.
Parkinson, G. H. R., “Spinoza and British Idealism: The Case of H. H. Joachim,” British Journal of the History of Philosophy 1 (1993), pp. 109–123.
Perry, J., Identity, Personal Identity, and the Self. Indianapolis: Hackett, 2002.
Pinkard, T., “The Logic of Hegel’s Logic,” Journal for the History of Philosophy 17 (1979), pp. 417–435.
Pippin, R., Hegel’s Idealism: The Satisfactions of Self-Consciousness. Cambridge University Press, 1989.
Pistorius, H. A., “‘Erläuterungen über des Herrn Professor Kant ‘Critik der reinen Vernunft’ von Joh. Schulze,” Allgemeine deutsche Bibliothek 66/1 (1786), pp. 92–123.
Radner, D., “Spinoza’s Theory of Ideas,” Philosophical Review 80 (1971), pp. 338–359.
Richter, G. T., Spinozas philosophische Terminologie: Historisch und immanent kritisch untersucht. Leipzig: Barth, 1913.
Rivaud, A., Les notions d’essence et d’existence dans la philosophie de Spinoza. Paris: Alcan, 1906.
Russell, B., “Some Explanations in Reply to Mr. Bradley,” Mind 19 (1910), pp. 373–378.
Sandkaulen, B., “Die Ontologie der Substanz, der Begriff der Subjektivität und die Faktizität des Einzelnen: Hegels reflexionslogische ‘Widerlegung’ der Spinozanischen Metaphysik,” Internationales Jahrbuch des deutschen Idealismus 5 (2007), pp. 235–275.
Sandkaulen-Bock, B., Ausgang vom Unbedingten: Über den Anfang in der Philosophie Schellings. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1990.
Savan, D., “Spinoza and Language,” Philosophical Review 67 (1958), pp. 212–225.
Schaffer, J., “Monism: The Priority of the Whole,” Philosophical Review 119 (2010), pp. 31–76.
Schmid, I., “Die naturwissenschaftlichen Institute bei der Universität Jena unter Goethes Oberaufsicht,” D.Phil. dissertation. Humboldt-Universität Berlin, 1979.
Schneider, H. U., Philosophie und Universität. Hamburg: Meiner, 1999.
Schneider, H. U., “Spinoza in der deutschen Philosophiegeschichtsschreibung,” in Spinoza in der europäischen Geistesgeschichte. Berlin: Edition Hentrich, 1994, pp. 305–331.
Sellars, W., Science and Metaphysics: Variations on Kantian Themes. London: Routledge, 1968.
Sigwart, C., Spinozas neuentdeckter Tractat von Gott, den Menschen und dessen Glückseligkeit. Gotha: Johannes Kepler Verlag, 1868.
Snow, D., Schelling and the End of Idealism. Albany: SUNY, 1996.
Stolzenberg, J., Fichtes Begriff der intellektuellen Anschauung: Die Entwicklung in den Wissenschaftslehren von 1793/94 bis 1801/02. Stuttgart: Klett–Cotta, 1986.
Theunissen, M., Schein und Sein: Die kritische Funktion der Hegelschen Logik. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1978.
Tilliette, X., “Erste Fichte-Rezeption: Mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der intellektuellen Anschauung,” in K. Hammacher (ed.), Der Transzendentale Gedanke: Die gegenwärtige Darstellung der Philosophie Fichtes. Hamburg: Meiner, 1981, pp. 532–545.
Tilliette, X., Recherches sur l’intuition intellectuelle de Kant à Hegel. Paris: Vrin, 1995.
Tilliette, X., Schelling: Une philosophie en devenir, 2 vols. Vol. i: Le système vivant. Vrin: Paris, 1970.
van Inwagen, P., An Essay on Free Will. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983.
van Inwagen, P., Metaphysics, 3rd edn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 2009.
Vaysse, J.-M., Totalité et subjectivité: Spinoza dans l’idéalisme allemande. Paris: Vrin, 1994.
Vollrath, W., Die Auseinandersetzung Herders mit Spinoza. Darmstadt: C. F. Winter, 1911.
Walther, M., Metaphysik als Anti-Theologie: Die Philosophie Spinozas im Zusammenhang der religionsphilosophischen Problematik. Hamburg: Meiner, 1971.
Watkins, E. (ed.), Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason: Background and Source Materials. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
Weisse, C. H., “Die philosophische Literatur der Gegenwart,” Zeitschrift für Philosophie und spekulative Theologie 3 (1841), pp. 255–304.
Wells, N., “Objective Reality of Ideas in Descartes, Caterus, and Suárez,” Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (1990), pp. 33–61.
Wilson, M., “Objects, Ideas, and ‘Minds’: Comments on Spinoza’s Theory of Mind,” in Ideas and Mechanism: Essays on Early Modern Philosophy. Princeton University Press, 1999, pp. 26–40.
Wolfson, H. A., The Philosophy of Spinoza: Unfolding the Latent Processes of His Reasoning, 2 vols. Vol. i. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1934.
Yovel, Y., Spinoza and Other Heretics, 2 vols. Princeton University Press, 1989.
Zammito, J., The Genesis of Kant’s Critique of Judgment. University of Chicago Press, 1992.
Zammito, J., “Herder, Kant, Spinoza und die Ursprünge des deutschen Idealismus,” in M. Heinz (ed.), Herder und die Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus. Amsterdam: Rodopi, 1997, pp. 166–188.