References
Ahn, J. S., Van Lancker Sidtis, D., and Sidtis, J. J. (2014). Effects of deep brain stimulation on pausing during spontaneous speech in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 21(3):179–186.
Alderete, J., Baese-Berk, M., Leung, K., and Goldrick, M. (2021). Cascading activation in phonological planning and articulation: Evidence from spontaneous speech errors. Cognition, 210:104577.
Anderson, A. H., Bader, M., Bard, E. G. et al. (1991). The HCRC Map Task Corpus. Language and Speech, 34(4):351–366.
Appelbaum, I. (1996). The lack of invariance problem and the goal of speech perception. In Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP ’96, volume 3, pages 1541–1544.
Arai, T. (1999). A case study of spontaneous speech in Japanese. In Fourteenth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, volume 1, pages 615–618.
Arai, T., Warner, N., and Greenberg, S. (2007). Analysis of spontaneous Japanese in a multi-language telephone-speech corpus. Acoustical Science and Technology, 28(1):46–48.
Arnold, D. and Tomaschek, F. (2016). The Karl Eberhards Corpus of spontaneously spoken southern German in dialogues – audio and articulatory recordings. In Draxler, C. and Kleber, F., eds., Tagungsband der 12: Tagung Phonetik und Phonologie im deutschsprachigen Raum. Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, pages 911.
Arnold, D., Tomaschek, F., Sering, K., Lopez, F., and Baayen, R. H. (2017). Words from spontaneous conversational speech can be recognized with human-like accuracy by an error-driven learning algorithm that discriminates between meanings straight from smart acoustic features, bypassing the phoneme as recognition unit. PLOS ONE, 12(4):e0174623.
Aylett, M. and Turk, A. (2004). The Smooth Signal Redundancy Hypothesis: A functional explanation for relationships between redundancy, prosodic prominence, and duration in spontaneous speech. Language and Speech, 47(1):31–56.
Aylett, M. and Turk, A. (2006). Language redundancy predicts syllabic duration and the spectral characteristics of vocalic syllable nuclei. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(5):3048–3058.
Baker, R. and Hazan, V. (2011). DiapixUK: Task materials for the elicitation of multiple spontaneous speech dialogs. Behavior Research Methods, 43(3):761–770.
Balota, D. A., Yap, M. J., Hutchison, K. A., and Cortese, M. J. (2012). Megastudies: What do millions (or so) of trials tell us about lexical processing. In Adelman, J. S. (Ed.), Visual word recognition: Models and methods, orthography and phonology. In Visual Word Recognition Volume 1: Models and Methods, Orthography and Phonology, page 90–115. Psychology Press.
Bard, E. G., Shillcock, R. C., and Altmann, G. T. M. (1988). The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: Effects of subsequent context. Perception & Psychophysics, 44(5):395–408.
Barry, W. and Andreeva, B. (2001). Cross-language similarities and differences in spontaneous speech patterns. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31(1):51–66.
Bates, R. A., Ostendorf, M., and Wright, R. A. (2007). Symbolic phonetic features for modeling of pronunciation variation. Speech Communication, 49(2):83–97.
Batliner, A., Kompe, R., Kießling, A., Nöth, E., and Niemann, H. (1995). Can you tell apart spontaneous and read speech if you just look at prosody? In Ayuso, A. J. R. and Soler, J. M. L., eds., Speech Recognition and Coding, NATO ASI Series, pages 321–324. Springer, Berlin.
Bauernfeind, G., Haumann, S., and Lenarz, T. (2016). fNIRS for future use in auditory diagnostics. Current Directions in Biomedical Engineering, 2(1):229–232. Publisher: De Gruyter.
Beckman, M. E. (1997). A typology of spontaneous speech. In Sagisaka, Y., Campbell, N., and Higuchi, N., eds., Computing Prosody: Computational Models for Processing Spontaneous Speech, pages 7–26. Springer, New York.
Bell, A., Brenier, J. M., Gregory, M., Girand, C., and Jurafsky, D. (2009). Predictability effects on durations of content and function words in conversational English. Journal of Memory and Language, 60(1):92–111.
Bell, A., Jurafsky, D., Fosler-Lussier, E. et al. (2003). Effects of disfluencies, predictability, and utterance position on word form variation in English conversation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 113:1001–1024.
Birkholz, P., Jackel, D., and Kroger, B. (2006). Construction and control of a three-dimensional vocal tract model. In 2006 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics Speed and Signal Processing Proceedings, volume 1, pages 873–876.
Blaauw, E. (1994). The contribution of prosodic boundary markers to the perceptual difference between read and spontaneous speech. Speech Communication, 14(4):359–375.
Bóna, J. (2011). Disfluencies in the spontaneous speech of various age groups: Data from Hungarian. Govor, 28(2):95–115. Publisher: Odjel za fonetiku Hrvatskoga filološkoga društva.
Bortfeld, H., Leon, S. D., Bloom, J. E., Schober, M. F., and Brennan, S. E. (2001). Disfluency rates in conversation: Effects of age, relationship, topic, role, and gender. Language and Speech, 44(2):123–147.
Bradlow, A. R. and Bent, T. (2002). The clear speech effect for non-native listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 112(1):272–284. Publisher: Acoustical Society of America.
Braunwald, S. R. and Brislin, R. W. (1979). The diary method updated. In Ochs, E. and Schieffelin, B. B., eds., Developmental Pragmatics, pages 21–42. Academic Press, New York.
Brennan, S. E. and Schober, M. F. (2001). How listeners compensate for disfluencies in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(2):274–296.
Brouwer, S., Mitterer, H., and Huettig, F. (2010). Shadowing reduced speech and alignment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1):EL32–EL37. Publisher: Acoustical Society of America.
Brouwer, S., Mitterer, H., and Huettig, F. (2012a). Can hearing puter activate pupil? Phonological competition and the processing of reduced spoken words in spontaneous conversations. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65(11):2193–2220. Publisher: Sage.
Brouwer, S., Mitterer, H., and Huettig, F. (2012b). Speech reductions change the dynamics of competition during spoken word recognition. Language and Cognitive Processes, 27(4):539–571. Publisher: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690965.2011.555268. Brouwer, S., Mitterer, H., and Huettig, F. (2013). Discourse context and the recognition of reduced and canonical spoken words. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34(3):519–539. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
Browman, C. P. and Goldstein, L. (1992). Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica, 49(3–4):155–180.
Brown, G., Anderson, A., Shillcock, R., and Yule, G. (1985). Teaching Talk: Strategies for Production and Assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Byrd, D. (1993). 54,000 American stops. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics, 83:97–116.
Cangemi, F. and Niebuhr, O. (2018). Rethinking reduction and canonical forms. In Cangemi, F., Clayards, M., Niebuhr, O., Schuppler, B., and Zellers, M., eds., Rethinking Reduction, pages 277–302. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter Mouton.
Chen, T.-Y. and Tucker, B. V. (2013). Sonorant onset pitch as a perceptual cue of lexical tones in Mandarin. Phonetica, 70(3):207–239.
Clifton, C., Meyer, A. S., Wurm, L. H., and Treiman, R. (2013). Language comprehension and production. In Healy, A. F., and Proctor, R. W., R. W., eds., Handbook of Psychology, 2nd ed. American Cancer Society, pages 523–547. Hoboken: Wiley.
Cohen, C. (2014). Probabilistic reduction and probabilistic enhancement. Morphology, 24(4):291–323.
Cohen, C. (2015). Context and paradigms: Two patterns of probabilistic pronunciation variation in Russian agreement suffixes. The Mental Lexicon, 10(3):313–338.
Cohen Priva, U. and Gleason, E. (2020). The causal structure of lenition: A case for the causal precedence of durational shortening. Language, 96(2):413–448. Publisher: Linguistic Society of America.
Coleman, J. (2003). Discovering the acoustic correlates of phonological contrasts. Journal of Phonetics, 31(3):351–372.
Collard, P., Corley, M., MacGregor, L. J., and Donaldson, D. I. (2008). Attention orienting effects of hesitations in speech: Evidence from ERPs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34(3):696–702. Publisher: American Psychological Association.
Connine, C. M., Ranbom, L. J., and Patterson, D. J. (2008). Processing variant forms in spoken word recognition: The role of variant frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(3):403–411.
Corley, M. and Hartsuiker, R. J. (2011). Why um helps auditory word recognition: The temporal delay hypothesis. PLOS ONE, 6(5):e19792. Publisher: Public Library of Science.
Corley, M., MacGregor, L. J., and Donaldson, D. I. (2007). It’s the way that you, er, say it: Hesitations in speech affect language comprehension. Cognition, 105(3):658–668.
Coupland, N. (2007). Style: Language Variation and Identity. Cambridge University Press. Google-Books-ID: oJE462b0kv4C.
Crystal, T. H. and House, A. S. (1990). Articulation rate and the duration of syllables and stress groups in connected speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88(1):101–112. Publisher: Acoustical Society of America.
Cutler, A. (1998). The Recognition of Spoken Words with Variable Representations. In Proceedings of ESCA workshop on sound patterns of spontaneous speech, pages 83–92.
Cutler, A., Dahan, D., and van Donselaar, W. (1997). Prosody in the Comprehension of Spoken Language: A Literature Review. Language and Speech, 40(2):141–201.
Cutler, A. and Weber, A. (2007). Listening Experience and the Phonetic-to-Lexical Mapping in L2. ICPhS XVI, page 6.
Dall, R., Brognaux, S., Richmond, K., Valentini-Botinhao, C., Henter, G. E., Hirschberg, J., Yamagishi, J., and King, S. (2016). Testing the consistency assumption: Pronunciation variant forced alignment in read and spontaneous speech synthesis. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 5155–5159. ISSN: 2379-190X.
de Boer, B. (2000). Emergence of vowel systems through self-organisation. AI communications, 13:27–39.
Dell, G. S., Chang, F., and Griffin, Z. M. (1999). Connectionist Models of Language Production: Lexical Access and Grammatical Encoding. Cognitive Science, 23:517–542.
Dellwo, V. (2006). Rhythm and Speech Rate: A Variation Coefficient for deltaC. In Karnowski, P. and Szigeti, I., editors, Language and language-processing, pages 231–241. Peter Lang, Frankfurt/Main.
Dellwo, V., Leemann, A., and Kolly, M.-J. (2015). The recognition of read and spontaneous speech in local vernacular: The case of Zurich German. Journal of Phonetics, 48:13–28.
DiCanio, C., Nam, H., Amith, J. D., García, R. C., and Whalen, D. H. (2015). Vowel variability in elicited versus spontaneous speech: Evidence from Mixtec. Journal of Phonetics, 48:45–59.
DiCanio, C., Nam, H., Whalen, D. H., Timothy Bunnell, H., Amith, J. D., and García, R. C. (2013). Using automatic alignment to analyze endangered language data: Testing the viability of untrained alignment. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(3):2235–2246.
Diehl, R. L., Lotto, A. J., and Holt, L. L. (2004). Speech Perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 55(1):149–179. Publisher: Annual Reviews.
Dilts, P. C. (2013). Modelling phonetic reduction in a corpus of spoken English using Random Forests and Mixed-Effects Regression. Thesis, University of Alberta.
Duez, D. (1995). On spontaneous French speech: aspects of the reduction and contextual assimilation of voiced stops. Journal of Phonetics, 23(4):407–427.
Ernestus, M. (2000). Voice assimilation and segment reduction in casual Dutch. A corpus-based study of the phonology-phonetics interface. LOT, Utrecht.
Ernestus, M. (2014). Acoustic reduction and the roles of abstractions and exemplars in speech processing. Lingua, 142:27–41.
Ernestus, M., Baayen, H., and Schreuder, R. (2002). The Recognition of Reduced Word Forms. Brain and Language, 81(1):162–173.
Ernestus, M. and Baayen, R. H. (2007). The comprehension of acoustically reduced morphologically complex words: The roles of deletion, duration, and frequency of occurrence. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, pages 773–776.
Ernestus, M., Dikmans, M. E., and Giezenaar, G. (2017a). Advanced second language learners experience difficulties processing reduced word pronunciation variants. Dutch Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1):1–20. Publisher: John Benjamins.
Ernestus, M., Kouwenhoven, H., and van Mulken, M. (2017b). The direct and indirect effects of the phonotactic constraints in the listener’s native language on the comprehension of reduced and unreduced word pronunciation variants in a foreign language. Journal of Phonetics, 62:50–64.
Ernestus, M. and Warner, N. (2011). An introduction to reduced pronunciation variants. Journal of Phonetics, 39(SI):253–260.
Ferguson, S. H. and Kewley-Port, D. (2007). Talker Differences in Clear and Conversational Speech: Acoustic Characteristics of Vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 50(5):1241–1255. Publisher: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Fowler, C. A. and Housum, J. (1987). Talkers’ signaling of “new” and “old” words in speech and listeners’ perception and use of the distinction. Journal of Memory and Language, 26(5):489–504.
Fox Tree, J. E. (1995). The Effects of False Starts and Repetitions on the Processing of Subsequent Words in Spontaneous Speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 34(6):709–738.
Fox Tree, J. E. (2001). Listeners’ uses ofum anduh in speech comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 29(2):320–326.
Freeman, V., Levow, G.-A., Wright, R., and Ostendorf, M. (2015). Investigating the Role of ‘yeah’ in Stance-Dense Conversation. INTERSPEECH 2015, pages 3076–3080.
Frisch, S. A. and Wright, R. (2002). The phonetics of phonological speech errors: An acoustic analysis of slips of the tongue. Journal of Phonetics, 30(2):139–162.
Fromkin, V., editor (1984). Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence. Number 77 in Janua Linguarum. De Gruyter Mouton. Publication Title: Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence.
Fromkin, V. A. (1971). The Non-Anomalous Nature of Anomalous Utterances. Language, 47(1):27–52. Publisher: Linguistic Society of America.
Fuchs, R. and Maxwell, O. (2016). The effects of mp3 compression on acoustic measurements of fundamental frequency and pitch range. In Speech Prosody 2016. ISCA. ISSN: 2333-2042.
Fujisaki, H. (1997). Prosody, Models, and Spontaneous Speech. In Sagisaka, Y., Campbell, N., and Higuchi, N., editors, Computing Prosody: Computational Models for Processing Spontaneous Speech, pages 27–42. Springer US, New York, NY.
Gabrea, M. and O’Shaughnessy, D. (2000). Detection of filled pauses in conversational speech. In ICSLP 2000, page 4, Beijing, China.
Gahl, S., Yao, Y., and Johnson, K. (2012). Why reduce? Phonological neighborhood density and phonetic reduction in spontaneous speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4):789–806.
Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., and Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3):361–377.
Garrett, M. F. (1975). The analysis of sentence production. In Bower, G. H., editor, The psychology of learning and motivation, pages 133–178. Academic Press, New York.
Gaskell, M. G. (2003). Modelling regressive and progressive effects of assimilation in speech perception. Journal of Phonetics, 31(3-4):447–463.
Godfrey, J. J., Holliman, E. C., and McDaniel, J. (1992). SWITCHBOARD: telephone speech corpus for research and development. In [Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, volume 1, pages 517–520 vol. 1. ISSN: 1520-6149.
Goldinger, S. D. (1996). Words and voices: Episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22(5):1166–1183. Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
Goldinger, S. D. (2007). A Complementary-Systems Approach to Abstract and Episodic Speech Perception. ICPhS XVI, page 6.
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. Academic P. Google-Books-ID: BAsNAAAAIAAJ.
Gonzalez, J., Cervera, T., and Llau, M. J. (2003). Acoustic Analysis of Pathological Voices Compressedwith MPEG System. Journal of Voice, 17(2):126–139.
Greenberg, S. (1999). Speaking in shorthand – A syllable-centric perspective for understanding pronunciation variation. Speech Communication, 29(2):159–176.
Greenberg, S., Hollenback, J., and Ellis, D. (1996). Insights into spoken language gleaned from phonetic transcription of the Switchboard corpus. In International Conference on Spoken Language Processing.
Gregory, M. L., Raymond, W. D., Bell, A., Fosler-Lussier, E., and Jurafsky, D. (1999). The effects of collocational strength and contextual predictability in lexical production. In Chicago Linguistic Society, volume 35, pages 151–166.
Grosjean, F. and Frauenfelder, U. H. (1996). A Guide to Spoken Word Recognition Paradigms: Introduction. Language and Cognitive Processes, 11(6):553–558.
Guenther, F. H. (2016). Neural Control of Speech. MIT Press. Google-Books-ID: aRSvDAAAQBAJ.
Hamilton, L. S. and Huth, A. G. (2018). The revolution will not be controlled: natural stimuli in speech neuroscience. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(5):573–582.
Hanique, I. and Ernestus, M. (2011). Final /t/ Reduction in Dutch Past-Participles: The Role of Word Predictability and Morphological Decomposability. INTERSPEECH 2011, pages 2849–2852.
Hannun, A., Case, C., Casper, J., Catanzaro, B., Diamos, G., Elsen, E., Prenger, R., Satheesh, S., Sengupta, S., Coates, A., and Ng, A. Y. (2014). Deep Speech: Scaling up end-to-end speech recognition. arXiv:1412.5567 [cs]. arXiv: 1412.5567.
Harley, T. A. (2013). The Psychology of Language: From Data to Theory. Psychology Press. Google-Books-ID: Ax5iAgAAQBAJ.
Hawkins, S. (2003). Roles and representations of systematic fine phonetic detail in speech understanding. Journal of Phonetics, 31(3):373–405.
Hickok, G. (2014a). The architecture of speech production and the role of the phoneme in speech processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(1):2–20.
Hickok, G. (2014b). Towards an integrated psycholinguistic, neurolinguistic, sensorimotor framework for speech production. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(1):52–59.
Himmelmann, N. P. (1998). Documentary and descriptive linguistics. Linguistics, 36(1):161–195. Publisher: Walter de Gruyter, Berlin / New York Section: Linguistics.
Hintzman, D. L. (1986). ‘Schema extraction’ in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95:528–551.
Hirschberg, J. (2000). A Corpus-Based Approach to the Study of Speaking Style. In Horne, M., editor, Prosody: Theory and Experiment, volume 14, pages 335–350. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht. Series Title: Text, Speech and Language Technology.
Howell, P. and Kadi-Hanifi, K. (1991). Comparison of prosodic properties between read and spontaneous speech material. Speech Communication, 10(2):163–169.
Hymes, D. H. (1962). On Studying the History of Anthropology. Kroeber Anthropological Society Papers, 26:81–86.
Jaeger, T. F. and Buz, E. (2017). Signal Reduction and Linguistic Encoding. In The Handbook of Psycholinguistics, pages 38–81. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Jannedy, S., Weirich, M., and Helmeke, L. (2015). Acoustic analyses of differences in [ç] and [\textipa{S}] productions in Hood German. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Glasgow, Scotland.
Jannetts, S., Schaeffler, F., Beck, J., and Cowen, S. (2019). Assessing voice health using smartphones: bias and random error of acoustic voice parameters captured by different smartphone types. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 54(2):292–305. _eprint: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/1460-6984.12457. Johnson, K. (1997). The auditory/perceptual basis for speech segmentation. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics, 50:101–113.
Johnson, K. (2004). Massive reduction in conversational American English. In Spontaneous speech: data and analysis. Proceedings of the 1st session of the 10th international symposium, pages 29–54, Tokyo, Japan.
Järvikivi, J. and Tucker, B. V. (2015). Corpus of Spontaneous Multimodal Interactive Language (CoSMIL).
Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., Gregory, M., and Raymond, W. (2001). Probabilistic relations between words: Evidence from reduction in lexical production. In Bybee, J. and Hopper, P., editors, Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure, pages 229–254. John Benjamins, Amsterdam.
Jurafsky, D., Bell, A., and Gyrand, C. (2002). The Role of the Lemma in Form Variation. In Gussenhoven, C. and Warner, N., editors, Papers in Laboratory Phonology VII, pages 1–34. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin/New York.
Kahneman, D. and Beatty, J. (1966). Pupil Diameter and Load on Memory. Science, 154(3756):1583–1585. Publisher: American Association for the Advancement of Science Section: Reports.
Keating, P. A. (1990). The window model of coarticulation: articulatory evidence. In Kingston, J. and Beckman, M. E., editors, Papers in Laboratory Phonology: Volume 1: Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, volume 1 of Papers in Laboratory Phonology, pages 451–470. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Kempler, D. and Lancker, D. V. (2002). Effect of Speech Task on Intelligibility in Dysarthria: A Case Study of Parkinson’s Disease. Brain and Language, 80(3):449–464.
Kemps, R., Ernestus, M., Schreuder, R., and Baayen, H. (2004). Processing reduced word forms: The suffix restoration effect. Brain and Language, 90(1):117–127.
Kendall, T. and Fridland, V. (2021). Sociophonetics, Style and Identity. In Sociophonetics, Key Topics in Sociolinguistics, pages 126–155. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Keszler, B. and Bóna, J. (2019). Pausing and disfluencies in elderly speech: Longitudinal case studies. In Rose, R. L. and Eklund, R., editors, Proceedings of DiSS 2019, pages 67–70, Budapest, Hungary. ELTE Faculty of Humanities.
Keune, K., Ernestus, M., Hout, R. v., and Baayen, R. H. (2005). Variation in Dutch: From written MOGELIJK to spoken MOK. Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory, 1(2):183–223. Publisher: Walter de Gruyter Section: Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory.
Kiefte, M. and Nearey, T. M. (2019). Theories and models of speech perception. In Katz, W. F. and Assmann, P. F., editors, The Routledge Handbook of Phonetics, pages 289–313. Routledge. Pages: 289-313 Publication Title: The Routledge Handbook of Phonetics.
Klatt, D. H. and Klatt, L. C. (1990). Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 87:820–857.
Koch, X. and Janse, E. (2016). Speech rate effects on the processing of conversational speech across the adult life span. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 139(4):1618–1636.
Kohler, K. (1996). Labelled data bank of spoken standard German: the Kiel corpus of read/spontaneous speech. In Proceeding of Fourth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. ICSLP ’96, volume 3, pages 1938–1941 vol. 3.
Kohler, K. J. (1990). Segmental reduction in connected speech in German: phonological effects and phonetic explanations. In Hardcastle, W. J. and Marchal, A., editors, Speech production and speech modelling, pages 21–33. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Kohler, K. J., Peters, B., and Scheffers, M. (2018). The Kiel Corpus of spoken German: Read and spontaneous speech.
Kominek, J., Bennett, C. L., and Black, A. W. (2003). Evaluating and Correcting Phoneme Segmentation for Unit Selection Synthesis. In Eurospeech 2003, pages 313–316, Geneva.
Kuperman, V., Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., and Baayen, H. (2007). Morphological predictability and acoustic duration of interfixes in Dutch compounds. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(4):2261–2271.
Laan, G. P. M. (1997). The contribution of intonation, segmental durations, and spectral features to the perception of a spontaneous and a read speaking style. Speech Communication, 22(1):43–65.
Labov, W. (1972). Sociolinguistic Patterns. University of Pennsylvania Press. Google-Books-ID: hD0PNMu8CfQC.
Laeng, B., Sirois, S., and Gredebäck, G. (2012). Pupillometry: A Window to the Preconscious? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(1):18–27. Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.
Lansford, K. L. and Liss, J. M. (2014). Vowel Acoustics in Dysarthria: Mapping to Perception. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(1):68–80. Publisher: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association.
Le Grézause, E. (2017). Um and Uh, and the Expression of Stance in Conversational Speech. PhD thesis, University of Washington.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1983). Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition, 14(1):41–104.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1989). Speaking. From intention to articulation. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
Levelt, W. J. M. (1999). Models of word production. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3(6):223–232.
Levin, H., Schaffer, C. A., and Snow, C. (1982). The Prosodic and Paralinguistic Features of Reading and Telling Stories. Language and Speech, 25(1):43–54.
Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., and Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74(6):431–461. Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
Lickley, R. J. (1994). Detecting disfluency in spontaneous speech. PhD Thesis, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh. Accepted: 2017-04-20T10:46:43Z Publisher: The University of Edinburgh.
Lickley, R. J. and Bard, E. G. (1998). When Can Listeners Detect Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech? Language and Speech, 41(2):203–226.
Lindblom, B. (1963). Spectrographic Study of Vowel Reduction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35(11):1773–1781.
Lindblom, B. (1990). Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, W. J. and Marchal, A., editors, Speech production and speech modeling, pages 403–440. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Linke, M. and Ramscar, M. (2020). How the Probabilistic Structure of Grammatical Context Shapes Speech. Entropy, 22(1):90. Number: 1 Publisher: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
Lisker, L. and Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3):384–422.
Local, J. K., Kelly, J., and Wells, W. H. G. (1986). Towards a phonology of conversation: turn-taking in Tyneside English1. Journal of Linguistics, 22(2):411–437. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
Lowit, A., Marchetti, A., Corson, S., and Kuschmann, A. (2018). Rhythmic performance in hypokinetic dysarthria: Relationship between reading, spontaneous speech and diadochokinetic tasks. Journal of Communication Disorders, 72:26–39.
Luce, P. A. and Pisoni, D. B. (1998). Recognizing Spoken Words: The Neighborhood Activation Model. Ear and hearing, 19(1):1–36.
MacGregor, L. J., Corley, M., and Donaldson, D. I. (2009). Not all disfluencies are are equal: The effects of disfluent repetitions on language comprehension. Brain and Language, 111(1):36–45.
Maekawa, K. (2003). Corpus of Spontaneous Japanese: Its design and evaluation. In ISCA & IEEE Workshop on Spontaneous Speech Processing and Recognition.
Maekawa, K. (2005). Toward a pronunciation dictionary of Japanese: Analysis of CSJ. In Proceedings of Symposium on Large-Scale Knowledge Resources (LKR2005), pages 43–48.
Marslen-Wilson, W., Nix, A., and Gaskell, G. (1995). Phonological variation in lexical access: Abstractness, inference and english place assimilation. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10(3-4):285–308. Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/01690969508407097. Martin, J. G. and Strange, W. (1968). The perception of hesitation in spontaneous speech. Perception & Psychophysics, 3(6):427–438.
McAllister, J. (1991). The Processing of Lexically Stressed Syllables in Read and Spontaneous Speech. Language and Speech, 34(1):1–26.
McAuliffe, M., Socolof, M., Mihuc, S., Wagner, M., and Sonderegger, M. (2017). Montreal Forced Aligner: Trainable Text-Speech Alignment Using Kaldi. In Interspeech 2017, pages 498–502. ISCA.
McClelland, J. L., Mirman, D., and Holt, L. L. (2006). Are there interactive processes in speech perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(8):363–369.
McLennan, C. T., Luce, P. A., and Charles-Luce, J. (2003). Representation of lexical form. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29(4):539–553.
McQueen, J. M. (2007). Eight questions about spoken word recognition. The Oxford handbook of psycholinguistics, pages 37–53.
McQueen, J. M., Norris, D., and Cutler, A. (2006). Are there really interactive processes in speech perception? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(12):533. Publisher: Elsevier.
Megyesi, B. and Gustafson-Capkova, S. (2002). Production and Perception of Pauses and Their Linguistic Context in Read and Spontaneous Speech in Swedish. In ICSLP2002, page 4, Denver, Colorado, USA.
Mehta, G. and Cutler, A. (1988). Detection of Target Phonemes in Spontaneous and Read Speech. Language and Speech, 31(2):135–156.
Meringer, R. and Mayer, C. (1895). Versprechen und Verlesen: eine psychologisch-linguistische Studie. G.I. Göschen’sche Verlagshandlung, Stuttgart.
Mitterer, H. and Ernestus, M. (2006). Listeners recover /t/s that speakers reduce: Evidence from /t/-lenition in Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 34(1):73–103.
Mitterer, H. and McQueen, J. M. (2009). Processing reduced word-forms in speech perception using probabilistic knowledge about speech production. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35(1):244–263.
Mitterer, H. and Tuinman, A. (2012). The Role of Native-Language Knowledge in the Perception of Casual Speech in a Second Language. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. Publisher: Frontiers.
Moniz, H., Batista, F., Mata, A. I., and Trancoso, I. (2014). Speaking style effects in the production of disfluencies. Speech Communication, 65:20–35.
Mukai, Y. (2020). Production and perception of reduced speech and the role of phonological-orthographic consistency. Ph.D., University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Mukai, Y. and Tucker, B. V. (2017). The phonetic reduction of nasals and voiced stops in Japanese across speech styles. In Proceedings of the 31st General Meeting of the Phonetic Society of Japan, pages 31–36, Tokyo. The Phonetic Society of Japan.
Munson, B. and Solomon, N. P. (2004). The Effect of Phonological Neighborhood Density on Vowel Articulation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 47(5):1048–1058.
Nearey, T. M. (1995). A double-weak view of trading relations. Papers in Laboratory phonology IV: Phonology and Phonetic Evidence, pages 28–39.
Niedzielski, N. (1999). The Effect of Social Information on the Perception of Sociolinguistic Variables. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 18(1):62–85.
Norris, D. and McQueen, J. M. (2008). Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychological Review, 115(2):357–395.
Nosofsky, R. M. (1990). Relations between exemplar similarity and likelihood models of classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 34:393–418.
Ochshorn, R. M. and Sloetjes, H. (2017). Gentle.
Oostdijk, N. (2000). The Spoken Dutch Corpus Project. The ELRA Newsletter, 5:4–8.
Papesh, M. H. and Goldinger, S. D. (2015). Pupillometry and Memory: External Signals of Metacognitive Control. In Gendolla, G. H., Tops, M., and Koole, S. L., editors, Handbook of Biobehavioral Approaches to Self-Regulation, pages 125–139. Springer, New York, NY.
Pickett, J. M. and Pollack, I. (1963). Intelligibility of Excerpts from Fluent Speech: Effects of Rate of Utterance and Duration of Excerpt. Language and Speech, 6(3):151–164.
Pitt, M. A. (2009). How are pronunciation variants of spoken words recognized? A test of generalization to newly learned words. Journal of Memory and Language, 61(1):19–36.
Pitt, M. A., Dilley, L., Johnson, K., Kiesling, S., Raymond, W., Hume, E., and Fosler-Lussier, E. (2007). Buckeye Corpus of Conversational Speech (2nd release)[http://www.buckeyecorpus.osu.edu] Columbus, OH: Department of Psychology. Ohio State University (Distributor). Plag, I., Homann, J., and Kunter, G. (2017). Homophony and morphology: The acoustics of word-final S in English 1. Journal of Linguistics, 53(1):181–216. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., and Baayen, R. H. (2005a). Articulatory planning is continuous and sensitive to informational redundancy. Phonetica, 62:146–159.
Pluymaekers, M., Ernestus, M., and Baayen, R. H. (2005b). Lexical frequency and acoustic reduction in spoken Dutch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(4):2561–2569.
Podlubny, R. G., Nearey, T. M., Kondrak, G., and Tucker, B. V. (2018). Assessing the importance of several acoustic properties to the perception of spontaneous speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(4):2255–2268.
Pollack, I. and Pickett, J. M. (1963). The Intelligibility of Excerpts from Conversation. Language and Speech, 6(3):165–171.
Pollack, I. and Pickett, J. M. (1964). Intelligibility of excerpts from fluent speech: Auditory vs. structural context. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 3(1):79–84.
Pols, L. C. W. (1996). Analysis and Perception of Dynamic Events and of Reduction Phenomena in Speech. In ABSP-1996, pages 17–22, Keele, England, UK. ISCA.
Prins, R. and Bastiaanse, R. (2004). Analyzing the spontaneous speech of aphasic speakers. Aphasiology, 18(12):1075–1091. Place: United Kingdom Publisher: Taylor & Francis.
Ranbom, L. J. and Connine, C. M. (2007). Lexical representation of phonological variation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 57(2):273–298.
Rao, R. (2009). Deaccenting in Spontaneous Speech in Barcelona Spanish. Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics, 2(1):31–76. Publisher: De Gruyter Mouton Section: Studies in Hispanic and Lusophone Linguistics.
Rapp, B., Buchwald, A., and Goldrick, M. (2014). Integrating accounts of speech production: the devil is in the representational details. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(1):24–27.
Raymond, W. D., Dautricourt, R., and Hume, E. (2006). Word-internal /t,d/ deletion in spontaneous speech: Modeling the effects of extra-linguistic, lexical, and phonological factors. Language Variation and Change, 18(1):55–97. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
Renkema, J. (2009). Discourse, of Course: An overview of research in discourse studies. John Benjamins Publishing.
Renkema, J. and Schubert, C. (2018). Introduction to Discourse Studies. John Benjamins Publishing Company. Publication Title: z.219.
Roelofs, A. (2014). Integrating psycholinguistic and motor control approaches to speech production: where do they meet? Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 29(1):35–37.
Saltzman, E. L. and Munhall, K. G. (1989). A Dynamical Approach to Gestural Patterning in Speech Production. Ecological Psychology, 1(4):333–382.
Schachter, S., Christenfeld, N., Ravina, B., and Bilous, F. (1991). Speech disfluency and the structure of knowledge. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3):362–367. Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
Schilling, N. (2013). Investigating Stylistic Variation. In The Handbook of Language Variation and Change, pages 325–349. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Schnadt, M. J. and Corley, M. (2006). The Influence of Lexical, Conceptual and Planning Based Factors on Disfluency Production. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 28(28).
Schuppler, B., Ernestus, M., Scharenborg, O., and Boves, L. (2011). Acoustic reduction in conversational Dutch: A quantitative analysis based on automatically generated segmental transcriptions. Journal of Phonetics, 39(1):96–109.
Schwab, S. and Avanzi, M. (2015). Regional variation and articulation rate in French. Journal of Phonetics, 48:96–105.
Shafaei-Bajestan, E., Moradipour-Tari, M., Uhrig, P., and Baayen, R. H. (2021). LDL-AURIS: a computational model, grounded in error-driven learning, for the comprehension of single spoken words. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 0(0):1–28. Publisher: Routledge _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2021.1954207. Shannon, C. E. (1948). A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell System Technical Journal, 27:379–423.
Shockey, L. (2008). Sound Patterns of Spoken English. John Wiley & Sons. Google-Books-ID: 9OWQGsOB62UC.
Shriberg, E. (2001). To ‘errrr’ is human: ecology and acoustics of speech disfluencies. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 31(1):153–169. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
Shriberg, E. (2005). Spontaneous speech: How people really talk and why engineers should care. In Ninth European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology.
Shriberg, E. E. (1994). Preliminaries to a Theory of Speech Disfluencies. PhD Thesis, University of California at Berkeley, Berkeley.
Sims, M. N. (2016). The Role of Acoustic Detail in the Production and Processing of Vowels in Spontaneous Speech. PhD Thesis, University of Alberta.
Smiljanić, R. and Bradlow, A. R. (2005). Production and perception of clear speech in Croatian and English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(3):1677–1688. Publisher: Acoustical Society of America.
Sonderegger, M., Bane, M., and Graff, P. (2017). The medium-term dynamics of accents on reality television. Language, 93(3):598–640. Publisher: Linguistic Society of America.
Steen, F. and Turner, M. (2021). Red Hen Lab.
Stemberger, J. P. (2017). Morphology in Language Production with Special Reference to Connectionism. In The Handbook of Morphology, pages 428–452. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Story, B. H. (2005). A parametric model of the vocal tract area function for vowel and consonant simulation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 117(5):3231–3254. Publisher: Acoustical Society of America.
Sumner, M. (2013). A phonetic explanation of pronunciation variant effects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(1):EL26–EL32. Publisher: Acoustical Society of America.
Sumner, M. and Samuel, A. G. (2005). Perception and representation of regular variation: The case of final /t/. Journal of Memory and Language, 52(3):322–338.
Tang, K. and Bennett, R. (2018). Contextual predictability influences word and morpheme duration in a morphologically complex language (Kaqchikel Mayan). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(2):997–1017. Publisher: Acoustical Society of America.
Taschenberger, L., Tuomainen, O., and Hazan, V. (2019). Disfluencies in spontaneous speech in easy and adverse communicative situations: The effect of age. In Rose, R. L. and Eklund, R., editors, Proceedings of DiSS 2019, pages 55–58, Budapest, Hungary. ELTE Faculty of Humanities.
Tily, H. and Kuperman, V. (2012). Rational phonological lengthening in spoken Dutch. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 132(6):3935–3940. Publisher: Acoustical Society of America.
Tomaschek, F., Plag, I., Ernestus, M., and Baayen, R. H. (2021a). Phonetic effects of morphology and context: Modeling the duration of word-final S in English with naïve discriminative learning. Journal of Linguistics, 57(1):123–161. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
Tomaschek, F. and Tucker, B. V. (2021). The role of coarticulatory acoustic detail in the perception of verbal inflection. JASA Express Letters, 1(8):085201.
Tomaschek, F., Tucker, B. V., Ramscar, M., and Harald Baayen, R. (2021b). Paradigmatic enhancement of stem vowels in regular English inflected verb forms. Morphology, 31(2):171–199.
Tomasello, M. and Stahl, D. (2004). Sampling children’s spontaneous speech: how much is enough? Journal of Child Language, 31(1):101–121. Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
Torreira, F., Adda-Decker, M., and Ernestus, M. (2010). The Nijmegen Corpus of Casual French. Speech Communication, 52(3):201–212.
Trouvain, J., Koreman, J., Erriquez, A., and Braun, B. (2001). Articulation Rate Measures and Their Relation to Phone Classification in Spontaneous and Read German Speech. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, pages 155–158.
Tucker, B. V. (2007). Processing of fine phonetic detail in American English flaps. In Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, volume 121, page 3170.
Tucker, B. V. (2011). The effect of reduction on the processing of flaps and /g/ in isolated words. Journal of Phonetics, 39(3):312–318.
Tucker, B. V., Brenner, D., Danielson, D. K., Kelley, M. C., Nenadić, F., and Sims, M. (2019a). The Massive Auditory Lexical Decision (MALD) database. Behavior Research Methods, 51(3):1187–1204.
Tucker, B. V. and Ernestus, M. (2016). Why we need to investigate casual speech to truly understand language production, processing and the mental lexicon. The Mental Lexicon, 11(3):375–400.
Tucker, B. V., Sims, M., and Baayen, R. H. (2019b). Opposing forces on acoustic duration. Technical report, PsyArXiv.
Tucker, B. V. and Warner, N. (2007). Inhibition of processing due to reduction of the American English flap. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences, pages 1949–1952.
Tucker, B. V. and Wright, R. (2020). Introduction to the special issue on the phonetics of under-documented languages. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 147(4):2741–2744. Publisher: Acoustical Society of America.
Tuinman, A., Mitterer, H., and Cutler, A. (2012). Resolving ambiguity in familiar and unfamiliar casual speech. Journal of Memory and Language, 66(4):530–544.
Turnbull, R. (2018). Patterns of probabilistic segment deletion/reduction in English and Japanese. Linguistics Vanguard, 4(s2). Publisher: De Gruyter Section: Linguistics Vanguard.
Van de Ven, M. and Ernestus, M. (2018). The role of segmental and durational cues in the processing of reduced words. Language and Speech, 61(3):358–383.
Van de Ven, M., Ernestus, M., and Schreuder, R. (2012). Predicting acoustically reduced words in spontaneous speech: The role of semantic/syntactic and acoustic cues in context. Laboratory Phonology, 3(2):455–481. Publisher: De Gruyter Section: Laboratory Phonology.
Van de Ven, M., Tucker, B. V., and Ernestus, M. (2010). Semantic facilitation in bilingual everyday speech comprehension. In Proceedings of the 11th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, pages 1245–1248.
Van de Ven, M., Tucker, B. V., and Ernestus, M. (2011). Semantic context effects in the comprehension of reduced pronunciation variants. Memory & Cognition, 39(7):1301–1316.
van den Oord, A., Dieleman, S., Zen, H., Simonyan, K., Vinyals, O., Graves, A., Kalchbrenner, N., Senior, A., and Kavukcuoglu, K. (2016). WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audio. arXiv:1609.03499 [cs]. arXiv: 1609.03499.
Van Engen, K. J., Baese-Berk, M., Baker, R. E., Choi, A., Kim, M., and Bradlow, A. R. (2010). The Wildcat Corpus of Native-and Foreign-accented English: Communicative Efficiency across Conversational Dyads with Varying Language Alignment Profiles. Language and Speech, 53(4):510–540.
van Son, R., Koopmans-van Beinum, F., and Pols, L. C. W. (1998). Efficiency As An Organizing Principle Of Natural Speech. In ICSLP-1998, page 0203, Sydney, Australia.
Vance, T. J. (2008). The Sounds of Japanese with Audio CD. Cambridge University Press.
VanDam, M., Warlaumont, A. S., Bergelson, E., Cristia, A., Soderstrom, M., De Palma, P., and MacWhinney, B. (2016). HomeBank: An Online Repository of Daylong Child-Centered Audio Recordings. Seminars in speech and language, 37(2):128–142.
Vaughan, N., Storzbach, D., and Furukawa, I. (2006). Sequencing versus Nonsequencing Working Memory in Understanding of Rapid Speech by Older Listeners. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 17(07):506–518. Publisher: American Academy of Audiology.
Wagner, P., Trouvain, J., and Zimmerer, F. (2015). In defense of stylistic diversity in speech research. Journal of Phonetics, 48:1–12.
Ward, W. (1989). Understanding Spontaneous Speech. In Speech and Natural Language: Proceedings of a Workshop Held at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, February 21-23, 1989.
Warner, N. (2011). Reduction. In van Oostendorp, M., Ewen, C., Hume, E., and Rice, K., editors, The Blackwell Companion to Phonology: General issues and segmental phonology, volume 1, pages 1866–1891. John Wiley & Sons.
Warner, N. (2012). Methods for studying spontaneous speech. In The Oxford Handbook of Laboratory Phonology, pages 621–633. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Warner, N., Fountain, A., and Tucker, B. V. (2009). Cues to perception of reduced flaps. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 125(5):3317–3327. Publisher: Acoustical Society of America.
Warner, N. and Park, S. (2018). Spontaneous speech in the teaching of phonetics and speech perception. In ISAPh 2018 International Symposium on Applied Phonetics, pages 32–38. ISCA.
Warner, N. and Tucker, B. V. (2011). Phonetic variability of stops and flaps in spontaneous and careful speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(3):1606–1617.
Weber, A. and Scharenborg, O. (2012). Models of spoken-word recognition. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 3(3):387–401.
Wenke, R. J., Cornwell, P., and Theodoros, D. G. (2010). Changes to articulation following LSVT® and traditional dysarthria therapy in non-progressive dysarthria. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 12(3):203–220. Publisher: Taylor & Francis _eprint: https://doi.org/10.3109/17549500903568468. Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag New York.
Wieling, M., Grieve, J., Bouma, G., Fruehwald, J., Coleman, J., and Liberman, M. (2016). Variation and Change in the Use of Hesitation Markers in Germanic Languages. Language Dynamics and Change, 6(2):199–234. Publisher: Brill Section: Language Dynamics and Change.
Winn, M. B., Wendt, D., Koelewijn, T., and Kuchinsky, S. E. (2018). Best Practices and Advice for Using Pupillometry to Measure Listening Effort: An Introduction for Those Who Want to Get Started. Trends in Hearing, 22:233121651880086.
Wright, R. (2004). Factors of lexical competition in vowel articulation. In Local, J., Ogden, R., and R, T., editors, Papers in Laboratory Phonology 6, pages 75–87. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
Xu, Y. (2010). In defense of lab speech. Journal of Phonetics, 38(3):329–336.
Yuan, J., Lai, W., Cieri, C., and Liberman, M. (2018). Using Forced Alignment for Phonetics Research. Chinese Language Resources and Processing: Text, Speech and Language Technology.
Yuan, J. and Liberman, M. (2008). Speaker identification on the SCOTUS corpus. Proceedings of Acoustics ‘08, pages 5687–5690.
Zekveld, A. A., Kramer, S. E., and Festen, J. M. (2010). Pupil Response as an Indication of Effortful Listening: The Influence of Sentence Intelligibility. Ear and Hearing, 31(4):480–490.
Zellers, M., Schuppler, B., and Clayards, M. (2018). Introduction, or: why rethink reduction? In Cangemi, F., Clayards, M., Niebuhr, O., Schuppler, B., and Zellers, M., editors, Rethinking reduction, pages 1–23. De Gruyter Mouton. Publisher: de Gruyter Mouton Berlin.
Zevin, J. D. and Balota, D. A. (2000). Priming and attentional control of lexical and sublexical pathways during naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26(1):121–135. Place: US Publisher: American Psychological Association.
Zimmerer, F. and Reetz, H. (2014). Do listeners recover “deleted” final /t/ in German? Frontiers in Psychology, 5. Publisher: Frontiers.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human Behavior and the Principle of the Least Effort. An Introduction to Human Ecology. Hafner, New York.
Zue, V., Seneff, S., and Glass, J. (1990). Speech database development at MIT: Timit and beyond. Speech Communication, 9(4):351–356.
Zue, V. W. and Laferriere, M. (1979). Acoustic study of medial /t,d/ in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66(4):1039–1050.
Zwitserlood, P. (2018). Processing and Representation of Morphological Complexity in Native Language Comprehension and Production. In Booij, G., editor, The Construction of Words: Advances in Construction Morphology, Studies in Morphology, pages 583–602. Springer International Publishing, Cham.
