Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  • Cited by 14
Publisher:
Cambridge University Press
Online publication date:
November 2017
Print publication year:
2017
Online ISBN:
9781108265089

Book description

A new, thought-provoking book on the theory of grammar and language processing, based on the analysis of authentic speech produced in real time. Drawing on insights from cognitive psychology, neurology and conversation analysis, the author offers a fascinating, easy-to-follow account of why spoken English is structured the way it is. The traditional product-based approach to grammar is given up in favour of a speaker-based, dynamic perspective that integrates language-structural, neurocognitive and dialogic aspects of speech production. Based on fresh empirical research Haselow argues that grammatical knowledge rests upon two cognitive principles of linearization called 'microgrammar' and 'macrogrammar', which are shown to interact in various ways. The book discusses a broad range of speech phenomena under an integrated framework, such as the omnipresence of 'unintegrated' constituents (e.g. discourse markers), ellipses, or the allegedly 'fragmented' character of syntax, and explains the mechanisms of processing efficiency that guide syntactic planning.

Reviews

'… this book represents an illuminating interdisciplinary study that broadens the perspective of linguistic analysis by considering not only the context of an individual interaction, but also the cognitive mechanisms that give rise to the emergent grammar of spontaneous speech. Without doubt, this book can be used as a good reference book for students and researchers who are interested in interactional linguistics and cognitive linguistics.'

Haiping Wu Source: Journal of Pragmatics

'This monograph evidently carries massive implications for research into grammar and linguistic structure since it broadens the notion of grammar and provides an alternative approach to it, enabling researchers to investigate the emergent grammar of speech from an integrated perspective, differing from the monolithic, 'fixed-code' and sentence based approach to language and grammar through which grammar has been described and analysed. The book is also of immense significance to academics in discourse studies, a field where spontaneous spoken language data have become the mainstream research objects.'

Baicheng Zhang Source: Discourse Studies

Refine List

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Contents

References

Aijmer, Karin. 1986. Why is actually so popular in spoken English? In Tottie, Gunnel & Bäcklund, Ingegerd (eds.), English in speech and writing: A symposium. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell, 119127.
Aijmer, Karin. 2002. English discourse particles. Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aijmer, Karin. 2016. Pragmatic markers as constructions. The case of anyway. In Kaltenböck, Gunther, Keizer, Evelien & Lohmann, Arne (eds.), Outside the clause – Form and function of extra-clausal constituents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2958.
Almor, Amit. 1999. Noun-phrase anaphora and focus: The informational load hypothesis. Psychological Review 106, 748765.
Altmann, Gerry T. & Kamide, Yuki. 1999. Incremental interpretation at verbs: Restricting the domain of subsequent reference. Cognition 73 (3), 247264.
Ameka, Felix. 1992. Interjections: The universal yet neglected part of speech. Journal of Pragmatics 18, 101118.
Anderson, John R., Reder, Lynne M. & Lebiere, Christian. 1996. Working memory: Activation limits on retrieval. Cognitive Psychology 30 (3), 221256.
Antomo, Mailin & Steinbach, Markus. 2010. Desintegration und Interpretation: Weil-V2- Sätze an der Schnittstelle zwischen Syntax, Semantik und Pragmatik. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 29 (1), 137.
Ariel, Mira. 1990. Accessing noun-phrase antecedents. London: Routledge.
Ariel, Mira. 1991. The function of accessibility in a theory of grammar. Journal of Pragmatics 16, 443463.
Ariel, Mira. 2008. Pragmatics and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Arnold, Jennifer, Fagnano, Maria & Tanenhaus, Michael K.. 2003. Disfluencies signal theee, um, new information. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 32, 2536.
Auer, Peter, 1996a. The pre-front field in spoken German and its relevance as a grammaticalization position. Pragmatics 6 (3), 295322.
Auer, Peter. 1996b. On the prosody and syntax of turn-continuations. In Couper- Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret (eds.), Prosody in conversation. Interactional studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57100.
Auer, Peter. 2000. On-line syntax – oder: Was es bedeuten könnte, die Zeitlichkeit der mündlichen Sprache ernst zu nehmen. Sprache und Literatur 85, 4356.
Auer, Peter. 2005. Projection in interaction and projection in grammar. Text 25 (1), 736.
Auer, Peter. 2009. On-line syntax: thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31 (1), 113.
Auer, Peter. 2015. The temporality of language in interaction: Projection and latency. In Deppermann, Arnulf & Günthner, Susanne (eds.), Temporality in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 2756.
Auer, Peter & Maschler, Yael. 2013. Discourse or grammar? VS patterns in spoken Hebrew and spoken German narratives. Language Sciences 37, 147181.
Auer, Peter & Pfänder, Stefan (eds.). 2011. Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Austin, John L. 1962. How to do things with words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baars, Bernard J. 1988. A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Baars, Bernard J. 1997. In the theater of consciousness: The workspace of the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Baars, Bernard J. 1998. Metaphors of consciousness and attention in the brain. Trends in Neurosciences 21, 5862.
Baddeley, Alan D. 1981. The role of subvocalisation in reading. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 33A, 439454.
Baddeley, Alan D. 1986. Working memory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Baddeley, Alan D. 2000. The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 4, 417423.
Baddeley, Alan D. 2002. Is working memory still working? European Psychologist 7 (2), 8597.
Baddeley, Alan D. 2003. Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders 36, 189208.
Baddeley, Alan D. & Hitch, Graham J.. 2000. Development of working memory: Should the Pascual-Leone and the Baddeley and Hitch models be merged? Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 77 (2), 128137.
Baddeley, Alan D. & Logie, Robert H.. 1999. The multi-component model. In Miyake, Akira & Shah, Priti (eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2861.
Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1986 [1978]. The problem of speech genres. In Emerson, Caryl & Holquist, Michael (eds.), Speech genres and other late essays. Austin: University of Texas Press, 60102.
Barr, Dale J. 2001. Trouble in mind: Paralinguistic indices of effort and uncertainty in communication. In Cavé, Christian, Guaïtella, Isabelle & Santi, Serge (eds.), Oralié et gestualité, communication multimodale, interaction. Paris: L’Harmattan, 597600.
Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar. 2014. Dialogism and the emergence of final particles: The case of ‘and’. In Günthner, Susanne, Imo, Wolfgang & Bücker, Jörg (eds.), Grammar and dialogism. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 335366.
Barrouillet, Pierre, Bernardin, Sophie & Camos, Valérie. 2004. Time constraints and resource sharing in adults’ working memory spans. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 133 (1), 83100.
Beattie, Geoff. 1979. Planning units in spontaneous speech: some evidence from hesitation in speech and speaker gaze direction in conversation. Linguistics 17, 6178.
Beckner, Clay & Bybee, Joan. 2009. A usage-based account of constituency and reanalysis. Language Learning 59, 2949.
Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich. 2014. Introduction. In Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich (eds.), Discourse functions at the right and left periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change. Leiden: Brill, 123.
Beeman, Mark & Chiarello, Christine. 1998. Complementary right- and left-hemisphere language comprehension. Current Directions in Psychological Science 7 (1), 18.
Bell, David. 1998. Cancellative discourse markers: A core/periphery approach. Pragmatics 8 (4), 515542.
Bernal, Byron & Ardila, Alfredo. 2014. Bilateral representation of language: A critical review and analysis of some unusual cases. Journal of Neurolinguistics 28, 6380.
Berrendonner, Alain. 1990. Pour une macro-syntaxe. Travaux de Linguistique 21, 2536.
Berrendonner, Alain. 2002. Les deux syntaxes. Verbum 24 (1–2), 2336.
Bernini, Giuliano & Schwartz, Marcia L. (eds.). 2006. Pragmatic organization of discourse. [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology, Eurotype 20–8]. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across speech and writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Biber, Douglas, Johansson, Stig, Leech, Geoffrey, Conrad, Susan & Finegan, Edward. 1999. Longman grammar of spoken and written english. Harlow: Pearson Education.
Blake, Margaret Lehman. 2006. Clinical relevance of discourse characteristics after right hemisphere brain damage. American Journal of Speech–Language Pathology 15 (3), 255267.
Blake, Margaret Lehman. 2009. Inferencing processes after right hemisphere brain damage: effects of contextual bias. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 52 (2), 373384.
Blakemore, Diane. 1987. Semantic constraints on relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
Blakemore, Diane. 2002. Relevance and linguistic meaning: The semantics and pragmatics of discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire. 2003. Le recouvrement de la syntaxe et de la macro-syntaxe. In Scarano, Antonietta (ed.), Macro-syntaxe et pragmatique. L’analyse linguistique de l’oral. Roma: Bulzoni, 5375.
Blanche-Benveniste, Claire, Bilger, Mireille, Rouget, Christine & Van den Eynde, Karel. 1990. Le français parlé: études grammaticales. Paris: Éditions du CNRS.
Blanken, Gerhard. 1991. The functional basis of speech automatisms (recurring utterances). Aphasiology 5, 103127.
Blanken, Gerhard, Wallesch, Claus W. & Papagno, Constanza. 1990. Dissociations of language functions in aphasics with speech automatisms (recurring utterances). Cortex 26, 4163.
Blonder, Lee Xenakis, Bowers, Dawn & Heilman, Kenneth M.. 1991. The role of the RH in emotional communication. Brain 114 (3), 11151127.
Bock, Kathryn. 1982. Toward a cognitive psychology of syntax: Information processing contributions to sentence formulation. Psychological Review 89, 147.
Bock, Kathryn 1987. Co-ordinating words and syntax in speech plans. In Ellis, Andrew W. (ed.), Progress in the psychology of language. London: Erlbaum, 337390.
Bock, Kathryn & Irwin, David E.. 1980. Syntactic effects of information availability in sentence formulation. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 19, 467484.
Bock, Kathryn & Levelt, William J.M.. 1994. Language production: grammatical encoding. In Gernsbacher, Morton A. (ed.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics. San Diego: Academic Press, 945984.
Bolden, Galina. 2006. Little words that matter: discourse markers “so” and “oh” and the doing of other-attentiveness in social interaction. Journal of Communication 56, 661688.
Bolden, Galina. 2008. “So what’s up?”: using the discourse marker “so” to launch conversational business. Research on Language and Social Interaction 41 (3), 302327.
Bolinger, Dwight. 1976. Meaning and memory. Forum Linguisticum 1, 114.
Bookheimer, Susan. 2002. Functional MRI of language: new approaches to understanding the cortical organization of semantic processing. Annual Review of Neuroscience 25 (1), 151188.
Borod, Joan C., Bloom, Ronald, Brickman, Adam, Nakhutina, Luba & Curko, Elizabeth. 2002. Emotional processing deficits in individuals with unilateral brain damage. Applied Neuropsychology, 9 (1), 2336.
Bottini, Gabriella, Corcoran, Rhiannon, Sterzi, Roberto, Paulesu, Eraldo, Schenone, Pietro, Scarpa, Pina, Frackowiak, Richard & Frith, C. D.. 1994. The role of the right hemisphere in the interpretation of figurative aspects of language: A positron emission tomography activation study. Brain 117, 12411253.
Boye, Kasper. 2012. Epistemic Meaning. A crosslinguistic functional-cognitive study. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Bradshaw, John L. & Mattingley, Jason B.. 1995. Clinical neuropsychology: Behavioral and brain science. San Diego: Academic Press.
Brady, Marian, Armstrong, Linda & Mackenzie, Catherine. 2006. An examination over time of language and discourse production abilities following right hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Neurolinguistics 19 (4), 291310.
Brazil, David. 1995. A grammar of speech. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Brenning, Jana. 2015. Syntaktische Ko-konstruktionen im gesprochenen Deutsch. Heidelberg: Winter.
Brinton, Laurel J. 1996. Pragmatic markers in English. Grammaticalization and discourse functions. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brinton, Laurel J. 2008. The Comment Clause in English: Syntactic Origins and Pragmatic Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brinton, Laurel J. & Traugott, Elizabeth C.. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Briz, Antonio. 2001. El español coloquial en la conversación. Esbozo de pragmagramática. Barcelona: Ariel.
Broadbent, Donald E. 1958. Perception and communication. London: Pergamon Press.
Brownell, Hiram H., Potter, Heather H., Bihrle, Amy M. & Gardner, Howard. 1986. Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language 27 (2), 310321.
Brownell, Hiram H. & Joanette, Yves (eds.). 1993. Narrative discourse in neurological impaired and normal aging adults. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Company.
Buchsbaum, Bradley, Hickok, Gregory & Humphries, Colin. 2001. Role of left posterior superior temporal gyrus in phonological processing for speech perception and production. Cognitive Sciences 25, 663678.
Burklund, Charles W. & Smith, Aaron. 1977. Language and the cerebral hemispheres. Neurology 27, 627633.
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 2006. Parentheticals. In Brown, Keith (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 9. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 179182.
Bybee, Joan. 2010. Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Caplan, David, Stanczak, Louise & Waters, Gloria. 2008. Syntactic and thematic constraint effects on blood oxygenation level dependent signal correlates of comprehension of relative clauses. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 20, 643656.
Caplan, Rochelle & Dapretto, Mirella. 2001. Making sense during conversation: An fMRI study. Neuroreport 12 (16), 36253632.
Carreiras, Manuel, Pattamadilok, Chotiga, Meseguer, Enrique, Barber, Horacio & Devlin, Joseph T.. 2012. Broca’s area plays a causal role in morphosyntactic processing. Neuropsychologia 50, 816820.
Carroll, Ruth. 2008. Historical English phraseology and the extender tag. Selim 15, 737.
Carston, Robyn. 2004. Explicature and semantics. In Davis, Steven & Gillon, Brendan (eds.), Semantics: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 817845.
Chafe, Wallace. 1992. Intonation units and prominences in English natural discourse. Proceedings of the IRCS Workshop on prosody in natural speech, Institute for Research in Cognitive Science, Report No. 92–37. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Chafe, Wallace. 1994. Discourse, consciousness, and time. The flow and displacement of conscious experience in speaking and writing. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chafe, Wallace. 2012. From thoughts to sounds. In Gee, James P. & Handford, Michael (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Discourse Analysis. New York: Routledge, 357265.
Champagne-Lavau, Maud & Joanette, Yves. 2009. Pragmatics, theory of mind and executive functions after a right-hemisphere lesion: Different patterns of deficits. Journal of Neurolinguistics 22, 413426.
Chantraine, Yves, Joanette, Yves & Ska, Bernadette. 1998. Conversational abilities in patients with right hemisphere damage. In Paradis, Michel (ed.), Pragmatics in neurogenic communication disorders. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 2132.
Cherchi, Lucien. 1985. On the role of ellipsis in discourse coherence. In Meyer-Hermann, Reinhard & Rieser, Hannes (eds.), Ellipsen und fragmentarische Ausdrücke. Band 2. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 224249.
Cherry, Colin E. 1953. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25, 975979.
Cheshire, Jenny. 2007. Discourse variation, grammaticalisation and stuff like that. Journal of Sociolinguistics 11 (2), 155193.
Chipere, Ngoni. 2009. Individual differences in processing complex grammatical structures. In Sampson, Geoffrey, Gil, David & Trudgill, Peter (eds.), Language complexity as an evolving variable. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 178191.
Chomsky, Noam. 1965. Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, Noam. 1966. Cartesian Linguistics: a Chapter in the history of rationalist thought. New York: Harper & Row.
Chomsky, Noam. 1975. Reflections on Language. New York: Pantheon Books.
Christianson, Kiel & Ferreira, Fernanda. 2005. Conceptual accessibility and sentence production in a free word order language (Odawa). Cognition 98, 105135.
Clark, Herbert. 2002. Speaking in time. Speech Communication 36, 513.
Clark, Herbert & Fox Tree, Jean. 2002. Using ‘uh’ and ‘um’ in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84, 73111.
Clark, Herbert & Wasow, Thomas. 1998. Repeating words in spontaneous speech. Cognitive Psychology 37, 201242.
Clayman, Steven E. 2012. Address terms in the organization of turns at talk: The case of pivotal turn extensions. Journal of Pragmatics 44 (13), 18531867.
Code, Chris. 1982. Neurolinguistic analysis of recurrent utterance in aphasia. Cortex 18, 141152.
Code, Chris. 1987. Language, aphasia, and the right hemisphere. London: Wiley.
Code, Chris. 1991. Speech automatisms and recurring utterances. In Code, Chris (ed.), The characteristics of aphasia. London: Taylor & Francis, 155177.
Code, Chris. 1994. Modelling aphasic speech automatisms and recurring utterances: Contributions to sonority theory. Journal of Neurolinguistics 8, 257265.
Code, Chris, 1996. Speech from the isolated right hemisphere? Left hemispherectomy cases E.G. and N.F. In Code, Chris, Wallesch, Claus-W., Joanette, Yves, Lecours, André Roch (eds.), Classic cases in neuropsychology. Vol. 1. Hove: Psychology Press, 319336.
Code, Chris. 1997. Can the right hemisphere speak? Brain and Language 57, 3859.
Code, Chris. 2005. First in, last out? The evolution of aphasic lexical speech automatisms to agrammatism and the evolution of human communication. Interaction Studies 6, 311334.
Coulmas, Florian. 1981. Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech. The Hague: Mouton.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Thompson, Sandra A.. 2000. Concessive patterns in conversation. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Kortmann, Bernd (eds.), Cause, condition, concession, contrast. Cognitive and discourse perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 381410.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Thompson, Sandra A. 2005. A linguistic practice for retracting overstatements: ‘Concessive Repair’. In Hakulinen, Auli & Selting, Margret (eds.), Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 257288.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Ono, Tsuyoshi. 2007. Increments in cross-linguistic perspective: Introductory remarks. Special issue of Pragmatics 17 (4), 505512.
Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret. 1996. Towards an interactional perspective on prosody and a prosodic perspective on interaction. In Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth & Selting, Margret (eds.), Prosody in conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1156.
Cowan, Nelson. 2001. The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24, 87114.
Croft, William. 2000. Explaining language change. An evolutionary approach. Harlow: Longman.
Croft, William. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cuc, Alexandru, Ozuru, Yasuhiro, Manier, David & Hirst, William. 2006. On the formation of collective memories: the role of a dominant narrator. Memory & Cognition 34 (4), 752762.
Cuenca, Maria Josep. 2013. The fuzzy boundaries between discourse marking and modal marking. In Degand, Liesbeth, Pietrandrea, Paola & Cornillie, Bert (eds.), Discourse markers and modal particles: Categorization and description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 191216.
Cutica, Ilaria, Bucciarelli, Monica & Bara, Bruno G.. 2006. Neuropragmatics: Extralinguistic pragmatic ability is better preserved in left-hemisphere-damaged patients than in right hemisphere-damaged patients. Brain and Language 98 (1), 1225.
Dąbrowska, Eva. 1997. The LAD goes to school: a cautionary tale for nativists. Linguistics 35, 736766.
Dancygier, Barbara & Sweetser, Eve. 1997. ‘Then’ in conditional constructions. Cognitive Linguistics 8 (2), 109136.
Danon-Boileau, Laurent, Meunier, Annie, Morel, Mary-Annick & Tournandre, Nicolas. 1991. Intégration discursive et intégration syntaxique. Langages 104, 111128.
Darden, Lindley & Maull, Nancy. 1977. Interfield theories. Philosophy of Science 44, 4364.
Defour, Tine & Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie. 2010. “Positive appraisal” as a core meaning of well: A corpus-based analysis in Middle and Early Modern English data. English Studies 91 (6), 643673.
Degand, Liesbeth & Fagard, Benjamin. 2011. ‘Alors’ between discourse and grammar: The role of syntactic position. Functions of Language 18 (1), 2956.
Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola (eds.). 2013. Discourse markers and modal particles. Categorization and description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Dehé, Nicole. 2007. The relation between syntactic and prosodic parenthesis. In Dehé, Nicole & Kavalova, Yordanka (eds.), Parentheticals. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 261284.
Dehé, Nicole. 2009. Clausal parentheticals, intonational phrasing, and prosodic theory. Journal of Linguistics 45 (3), 569615.
Dehé, Nicole. 2014. Parentheticals in spoken English: The syntax-prosody relation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dehé, Nicole. 2016. The prosodic phrasing of parenthetical comment clauses in spontaneous spoken language: Evidence from Icelandic ‘held ég’. Studia Linguistica, online early view. Available at: onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-9582 (last access June 28, 2017).
Dehé, Nicole & Braun, Bettina. 2013. The prosody of question tags in English. English Language & Linguistics 17 (1), 129156.
Dehé, Nicole & Kavalova, Yordanka. 2006. The syntax, pragmatics and prosody of parenthetical ‘what’. English Language and Linguistics 10 (2), 289320.
Dehé, Nicole & Wichmann, Anne. 2010a. The multifunctionality of epistemic parentheticals in discourse: prosodic cues to the semantic-pragmatic boundary. Functions of Language 17 (1), 128.
Dehé, Nicole & Wichmann, Anne. 2010b. Sentence-initial I think (that) and I believe (that): Prosodic evidence for use as main clause, comment clause and discourse marker. Studies in Language 34 (1), 3674.
Dehé, Nicole, Feldhausen, Ingo & Ishihara, Shinichiro (eds.). 2011. New insights into the prosody–syntax interface: focus, phrasing, language evolution; Special issue of Lingua 121 (13), 18632034.
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2012. Über Sätze in Gesprächsbeiträgen – wann sie beginnen und wann man sie braucht. In Cortès, Colette (ed.), Satzeröffnung. Formen, Funktionen, Strategien. In collaboration with Behr, Irmtraud, Dalmas, Martine, Larrory- Wunder, Anne, Marschall, Gottfried & Sauerwein, Sibylle. Tübingen: Stauffenburg, 114.
Deppermann, Arnulf. 2013. Turn-design at turn-beginnings: Multimodal resources to deal with tasks of turn-construction in German. Journal of Pragmatics 46 (1), 91121.
Deppermann, Arnulf & Günthner, Susanne (eds.) 2015. Temporality in Interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
de Smedt, Koenraad. 1990. IPF: An incremental parallel formulator. In Dale, Robert, Mellish, Chris & Zock, Michael (eds.), Current research in natural language generation. London: Academic Press, 167192.
Detges, Ulrich & Waltereit, Richard. 2014. ‘Moi je ne sais pas vs. Je ne sais pas moi’: French disjoint pronouns in the left vs. right periphery. In Beeching, Kate & Detges, Ulrich (eds.), Discourse functions at the right and left periphery: Crosslinguistic investigations of language use and language change. Leiden: Brill, 2446.
Devinsky, Orrin. 2000. Right cerebral hemisphere dominance for a sense of corporeal and emotional self. Epilepsy and Behavior 1 (1), 6073.
Diewald, Gabriele. 2006. Discourse particles and modal particles as grammatical elements. In Fischer, Kerstin (ed.), Approaches to discourse particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 403425.
Diewald, Gabriele. 2011. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49 (2), 365390.
Diewald, Gabriele. 2013. ‘Same same but different’ – Modal particles, discourse markers and the art (and purpose) of categorization. In Degand, Liesbeth, Cornillie, Bert & Pietrandrea, Paola (eds.), Discourse markers and modal particles. Categorization and description. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1946.
Dik, Simon C. 1997. The Theory of Functional Grammar. Part 2. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Dines, Elizabeth R., 1980. Variation in discourse – ‘and stuff like that’. Language in Society 9 (1), 1331.
Dipper, Lucy, Bryan, Karen & Tyson, J.. 1997. Bridging inference and relevance theory: an account of right-hemisphere inference. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 11(3), 213228.
Du Bois, John W. & Giora, Rachel. 2014. From cognitive-functional linguistics to dialogic syntax. Cognitive Linguistics 25 (3), 351357.
Duden-Grammatik, . 2009. Die Grammatik. Published by the Dudenredaktion. Mannheim, Wien, Zürich: Dudenverlag.
Edwards, Susan & Knott, Raymond. 1994. Assessing spontaneous language abilities of aphasic speakers. In Graddol, David & Swann, Joan (eds.), Evaluating language. Clevedon, OH: Multilingual Matters, 91101.
Eisenberg, Peter. 2006. Grundriss der deutschen Grammatik. Vol. 2: Der Satz. Stuttgart: Metzler.
Ellis, Nick. 2015. Implicit AND explicit language learning: their dynamic interface and complexity. In Rebuschat, Patrick (ed.), Implicit and explicit learning of languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 323.
Enkvist, Nils Erik & Wårvik, Brita. 1987. Old English þa, temporal chains, and narrative structure. In Ramat, Anna Giacalone, Carruba, Onofrio & Bernini, Giuliano (eds.), Papers from the 7th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 221237.
Ericsson, K. Anders & Kintsch, Walter. 1995. Long-term working memory. Psychological Review 102 (2), 211245.
Erman, Britt. 1995. Grammaticalization in progress: The case of ‘or something’. In Moen, Inger, Simonsen, Hanne G. & Lødrup, Helge (eds.), Papers from the fifteenth Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, Oslo 13–15 January 1995. Oslo: Department of Linguistics, University of Oslo, 136147.
Erman, Britt & Warren, Beatrice. 2000. The idiom principle and the open choice principle. Text 20, 2962.
Fabbro, Franco. 1999. The neurolinguistics of bilingualism: An introduction. Hove: Psychology Press.
Fernandez-Vest, Jocelyne M. M. 2015. Detachments for cohesion. Berlin: De Gryuter Mouton.
Ferreira, Victor S. 1996. Is it better to give than to donate? Syntactic flexibility in language production. Journal of Memory & Language 35, 724755.
Ferreira, Victor S. & Dell, Gary S.. 2000. Effect of ambiguity and lexical availability on syntactic and lexical production. Cognitive Psychology 40, 296340.
Ferreira, Fernanda. 2005. Psycholinguistics, formal grammars, and cognitive science. The Linguistic Review 22, 365380.
Ferreira, Fernandes & Bailey, Karl G. D.. 2004. Disfluencies and human language comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8, 231237.
Ferrer-i-Cancho, Ramon. 2004. Euclidean distance between syntactically linked words. Physical Review E 70 (1), 056135.
Fiebach, Christian J., Friederici, Angela, Müller, Karsten & von Cramon, D. Yves. 2002. fMRI evidence for dual routes to the mental lexicon in visual word recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neurosciences 14 (1), 1123.
Fiebach, Christian J., Schlesewsky, Matthias, Lohmann, Gabriele, von Cramon, D. Yves & Friederici, Angela. 2005. Revisiting the role of Broca’s area in sentence processing: syntactic integration versus syntactic working memory. Human Brain Mapping 24, 7991.
Fischer, Kerstin. 2000. From cognitive semantics to lexical pragmatics: The functional polysemy of discourse particles. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Fischer, Kerstin (ed.). 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Ford, Marilyn & Holmes, Virginia A.. 1978. Planning units and syntax in sentence production. Cognition 6, 3553.
Ford, Cecilia & Thompson, Sandra. 1996. Interactional units in conversation: Syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. In Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 134184.
Fox, Barbara A. & Thompson, Sandra A.. 2007. Relative clauses in English conversation. Relativizers, frequency, and the notion of construction. Studies in Language 31 (2), 293326.
Fox Tree, Jean & Meijer, Paul J. A.. 1999. Building syntactic structure in speaking. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 28, 7192.
Franck, Dorothea. 1985. Sentences in conversational turns: A case of syntactic ‘double blind’. In Dascal, Marcelo (ed.), Dialogue. An interdisciplinary approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 233245.
Fraser, Bruce. 1996. Pragmatic markers. Pragmatics 6 (2), 167190.
Fraser, Bruce. 1999. What are discourse markers? Journal of Pragmatics 31 (7), 931952.
Friederici, Angela. 2002. Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6, 7884.
Friederici, Angela. 2004. The neural basis of syntactic processes. In Gazzaniga, Michael S. (ed.), The cognitive neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 789801.
Friederici, Angela. 2012. The cortical language circuit: From auditory perception to sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 16, 262268.
Friederici, Angela & Alter, Kai. 2004. Lateralization of auditory language functions: A dynamic dual pathway model. Brain and Language 89 (2), 267276.
Friederici, Angela, Rüschemeyer, Shirley-Ann, Hahne, Anja & Fiebach, Christian J.. 2003. The role of left inferior frontal and superior temporal cortex in sentence comprehension: localizing syntactic and semantic processes. Cerebral Cortex 13, 170177.
Friederici, Angela, Bahlmann, Jörg, Heim, Stefan, Schubotz, Ricarda & Anwander, Alfred. 2006. The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 103 (7), 24582463.
Gardner, Rod. 2005. Conversation Analysis. In Davies, Alan & Elder, Catherine (eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics. Oxford: Blackwell, 262284.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliff, NY: Prentice-Hall.
Garrett, M.F. 1980. Levels of processing in sentence production. In Butterworth, Brian (ed.), Language production, Vol. 1. London: Academic Press, 177220.
Geluykens, Ronald. 1992. From discourse process to grammatical construction. On left-dislocation in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Gibson, Edward. 1998. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition 68, 176.
Gibson, Edward. 2000. The dependency locality theory: A distance-based theory of linguistic complexity. In Miyashita, Yasushi, Marantz, Alec & O’Neill, Wayne (eds.), Image, Language, Brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 95126.
Gibson, Edward & Perlmutter, Neal J.. 1998. Constraints on sentence comprehension. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2, 262268.
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Oxford: Polity Press.
Giddens, Anthony. 1993. New rules of sociological method: A positive critique of interpretative sociologies. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Gildea, Daniel & Temperley, David. 2010. Do grammars minimize dependency length? Cognitive Sciences 34 (2), 286310.
Goffman, Erving. 1967. Interaction ritual: essays in face to face behavior. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
Goffman, Erving. 1978. Response cries. Language 54 (4), 787815.
Goffman, Erving. 1981. Radio talk. In Goffman, Erving (ed.), Forms of talk. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 197327.
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, Adele. 2006. Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldinger, Stephen D. 1998. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical acces. Psychological Review 105, 251279.
Goldman-Eisler, Frieda. 1968. Psycholinguistics: Experiments in spontaneous speech. New York: Academic Press.
Goldman-Rakic, Patricia S. 1996. The prefrontal landscape: implications of functional architecture for understanding human mentation and the central executive. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 351, 14451453.
Goodglass, Harold. 1993. Understanding Aphasia. New York: Academic Press.
Goodwin, Charles. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. In Psathas, George (ed.), Everyday language: Studies in ethnomethodology. New York: Irvington Publishers, 97121.
Goodwin, Charles. 1980. Restarts, pauses and the achievement of mutual gaze at turn beginning. Sociological Inquiry 50, 272302.
Gordon, Barry. 1997. Neuropsychology and advances in memory function. Current Opinion in Neurology 10, 306312.
Grice, Herbert P. 1969. Utterer’s meaning and intentions. Philosophical Review 78, 147177.
Griffin, Richard, Friedman, Ori, Ween, Jon, Winner, Ellen, Happé, Francesca & Brownell, Hiram. 2006. Theory of mind and the right cerebral hemisphere: refining the scope of impairment. Laterality 11, 195225.
Grimaldi, Mirko. 2012. Toward a neural theory of language: Old issues and new perspectives. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25, 304327.
Grodzinsky, Yosef & Friederici, Angela D.. 2006. Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 16, 240246.
Günthner, Susanne. 1999. Entwickelt sich der Konzessivmarker obwohl zum Diskursmarker? Grammatikalisierungstendenzen im gesprochenen Deutsch. Linguistische Berichte 180, 409446.
Günthner, Susanne. 2008. ‘Die Sache ist … ’: eine Projektorkonstruktion im gesprochenen Deutsch. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 27 (1), 3972.
Günthner, Susanne. 2011. Between emergence and sedimentation: Projecting constructions in German interaction. In Auer, Peter & Pfänder, Stefan (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and Emergent. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 156185.
Haegemann, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbials: the radical orphanage approach. In Chiba, Shuki, Ogawa, Akira, Fuiwara, Yasuaki, Yamada, Norio, Koma, Osamu & Yagi, Takao (eds.), Aspects of modern English linguistics: Papers presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th Birthday. Tokio: Kaitakusha, 232254.
Haiman, John. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In Pagliuca, William (ed.), Perspective on grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 328.
Hale, John. 2006. Uncertainty about the rest of the sentence. Cognitive Science 30 (4), 643672.
Halliday, M.A.K. 1989. Spoken and written language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Halliday, M.A.K. 2004. An introduction to functional grammar. Revised by Matthiesen, Christian M.I.M.. London: Arnold.
Hancil, Sylvie. 2015. The grammaticalization of final but: From conjunction to final particle. In Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje (eds.). Final particles. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 197217.
Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje (eds.). 2015. Final particles. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Happé, Francesca, Brownell, Hiram & Winner, Ellen. 1999. Acquired “theory of mind” impairments following stroke. Cognition 70, 211240.
Harris, Roy. 2012. Integrationist notes and papers 2012. Gamingley: Bright Pen.
Haselow, Alexander. 2011. Discourse marker and modal particle: The functions of utterance- final then in spoken English: Journal of Pragmatics 43 (14), 36033623.
Haselow, Alexander 2012a. Subjectivity, intersubjectivity and the negotiation of common ground in spoken discourse: Final particles in English. Language & Communication 32 (3), 182204.
Haselow, Alexander. 2012b. Discourse organization and the rise of final then in the history of English. In Hegedüs, Irén & Fodor, Alexandra (eds.), English historical linguistics 2010: Selected papers from the sixteenth International Conference on English Historical Linguistics (ICEHL-16), Pécs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 153175.
Haselow, Alexander. 2013. Arguing for a wide conception of grammar: The case of final particles in spoken discourse. Folia Linguistica 47 (2), 375424.
Haselow, Alexander. 2014. Sequentiality in dialogue as a trigger for grammaticalization. In Hancil, Sylvie & König, Ekkehard (eds.), Grammaticalization – Theory and data. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 203233.
Haselow, Alexander. 2015a. Left vs. right periphery in grammaticalization: The case of anyway. In Smith, Andrew, Trousdale, Graeme & Waltereit, Richard (eds.), New directions in grammaticalization research. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 157186.
Haselow, Alexander. 2015b. Final particles in spoken German. In Hancil, Sylvie, Haselow, Alexander & Post, Margje (eds.), Final particles. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 77107.
Haselow, Alexander. 2016a. Intensifying adverbs ‘outside the clause’. In Kaltenböck, Gunther, Keizer, Evelien & Lohmann, Arne (eds.), Outside the clause – Form and function of extra-clausal constituents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 379415.
Haselow, Alexander. 2016b. A processual view on grammar: Macrogrammar and the final field in spoken syntax. Language Sciences 54, 77101.
Hawkins, John. 1994. A performance theory of order and constituency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hawkins, John. 2004. Efficiency and complexity in grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heim, Stefan, Alter, Kai, Ischebeck, Anja K., Amunts, Katrin, Eickhoff, Simon B., Mohlberg, Hartmut, Zilles, Karl, von Cramon, D. Yves & Friderici, Angela. 2005. The role of the left Brodman’s areas 44 and 45 in reading words and pseudowords. Cognitive Brain Research 25 (3), 982993.
Heine, Bernd. 2012. On discourse markers: Grammaticalization, pragmaticalization, or something else? Linguistics 51 (6), 12051247.
Heine, Bernd, Kaltenböck, Gunther, Kuteva, Tania & Long, Haiping. 2013. An outline of Discourse Grammar. In Bischoff, Shannon & Jeny, Carmen (eds.), Reflections on functionalism in linguistics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 175233.
Heine, Bernd, Kuteva, Tania, Kaltenböck, Gunther & Long, Haiping. 2015. On some correlations between grammar and brain lateralization. Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (www.oxfordhandbooks.com)
Heritage, John. 1984. Garfinkel and ethnomethodology. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Heritage, John. 2013. Turn-initial position and some of its occupants. Journal of Pragmatics 57, 331337.
Heritage, John & Atkinson, J. Maxwell. 1984. Introduction. In Heritage, John & Atkinson, J. Maxwell (eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 115.
Hickok, Gregory & Poeppel, David. 2004. Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition 92 (1–2), 6799.
Hickok, Greogory & Poeppel, David. 2007. The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 8 (5), 393402.
Himmelmann, Nikolaus. 2004. Lexicalization and grammaticization: Opposite or orthogonal? In Bisang, Walther, Himmelmann, Nikolaus & Wiemer, Björn (eds), What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 2142.
Hiranuma, So. 1999. Syntactic difficulty in English and Japanese: A textual study. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 11, 309322.
Hird, Kathryn & Kirsner, Kim. 2003. The effect of right cerebral hemisphere damage on collaborative planning in conversation: An analysis of intentional structure. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 17 (4–5), 309315.
Hockett, Charles F. 1960. The origin of speech. Scientific American 203, 8996.
Höhle, Tilman N. 1986. Der Begriff ‘Mittelfeld’. Anmerkungen über die Theorie der topologischen Felder. In Weiss, Walter E., Wiegand, Herbert E. & Reis, Marga (eds.), Textlinguistik contra Stilistik. Akten des V. Internationalen Germanisten-Kongresses Göttingen, Bd. 3. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 329340.
Holmes, Janet. 1983. The functions of tag questions. English Language Research Journal 3, 4065.
Holmes, Janet. 1988. Of course: A pragmatic particle in New Zealand woman’s and men’s speech. Australian Journal of Linguistics 2, 4974.
Hopper, Paul. J. 1987. Emergent Grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13, 139157.
Hopper, Paul J. 1998. Emergent Grammar. In Tomasello, Michael (ed.), The new psychology of language. Mahwah, NJ: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, 155175.
Hopper, Paul J. 2001. Grammatical constructions and their discourse origins: prototype or family resemblance? In Pütz, Martin, Niemeier, Susanne & Dirven, René (eds.), Applied cognitive linguistics I: Theory and language acquisition. Berlin: De Gruyter, 109129.
Hopper, Paul. J. 2004. The openness of grammatical constructions. Chicago Linguistic Society 40, 239256.
Hopper, Paul J., 2011. Emergent grammar and temporality in interactional linguistics. In Auer, Peter & Pfänder, Stefan (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 2244.
Hopper, Paul J. 2015. Temporality and the emergence of a construction: a discourse approach to sluicing. In Deppermann, Arnulf & Günthner, Susanne (eds.), Temporality in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 123146.
Hopper, Paul J. & Thompson, Sandra A.. 2008. Projectability and clause combining in interaction. In Laury, Ritva (ed.), Cross-Linguistic studies of clause combining. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 99123.
Hough, Monica S. 1990. Narrative comprehension in adults with right and left hemisphere brain damage: Theme organization. Brain and Language 38, 253277.
Huddleston, Rodney & Pullum, Geoffrey. 2002. Language description: The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
ICE-GB = International Corpus of English – Great Britain, Realease 2, 2006. Survey of English Usage, University College London, London (CD Rom).
Imo, Wolfgang. 2015. Temporality and syntactic structure – Utterance-final intensifiers in spoken German. In Deppermann, Arnulf & Günthner, Susanne (eds.), Temporality in interaction. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 147171.
Izutsu, Mitsuko Narita & Izutsu, Katsunobu. 2014. Final hanging but in American English. Where a formal coordinator meets a functional subordinator. In Hancil, Sylvie & König, Ekkehard (eds.), Grammaticalization – Theory and data. Amsterdam: Benjamins, 257285.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1995. The boundaries of the lexicon. In Everaert, Martin, van der Linden, Erik-Jan, Schenk, André & Schreuder, Rob (eds.), Idioms. Structural and psychological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 133169.
Jakobson, Roman. 1980. The framework of language. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Jefferson, Gail. 1973. A case of precision timing in ordinary conversation: overlapped, tag positioned address terms in closing sequences. Semiotica 9 (1), 4796.
Jefferson, Gail. 1984. Notes on some orderliness of overlap onset. In D’Urso, Valtentina & Leonardi, Paolo (eds.), Discourse analysis and natural rhetoric. Padua: Cleup Editore, 1138.
Jiang, Jingyang & Liu, Haitao. 2015. The effects of sentence length on dependency distance, dependency direction and the implications – Based on a parallel English Chinese dependency treebank. Language Sciences 50, 93104.
Joseph, Rhawn. 1990. Neuropsychiatry, neuropsychology and behavioral neurology. New York: Plenum.
Jucker, Andreas H. 1993. The discourse marker ‘well’: a relevance theoretical account. Journal of Pragmatics 19 (5), 435452.
Jucker, Andreas H. & Smith, Sara W.. 1998. And people just you know like ‘wow’ – Discourse markers as negotiating strategies. In Jucker, Andreas H. & Ziv, Yael (eds.), Discourse markers. Theory and descriptions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 171201.
Jucker, Andreas H. & Ziv, Yael (eds). 1998. Discourse markers. Theory and descriptions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Just, Marcel A. & Carpenter, Patricia A.. 1992. A capacity theory of comprehension: individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review 99 (1), 122149.
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2008. ‘Prosody and function of English comment clauses.’ Folia Linguistica 42 (1), 83134.
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2013. Development of comment clauses. In Aarts, Bas, Close, Joanne, Leech, Geoffrey & Wallis, Sean (eds.), The English verb phrase: investigating recent change with corpora. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 286317.
Kaltenböck, Gunther. 2016. On the grammatical status of insubordinate if-clauses. In Kaltenböck, Gunther, Keizer, Evelien & Lohmann, Arne (eds.), Outside the clause – Form and function of extra-clausal constituents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 341377.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania. 2011. On thetical grammar. Studies in Language 35, 852897.
Kaltenböck, Gunther, Keizer, Evelien & Lohmann, Arne. 2016. Extra-clausal constituents. An overview. In Kaltenböck, Gunther, Keizer, Evelien & Lohmann, Arne (eds.). Outside the clause – Form and function of extra-clausal constituents. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 126.
Kamide, Yuki, Altmann, Gerry T. & Haywood, Sarah L.. 2003. The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: evidence from anticipatory eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language 49 (1), 133159.
Karlsson, Fred. 2007a. Constraints on multiple initial embedding of clauses. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 12 (1), 107118.
Karlsson, Fred. 2007b. Constraints on multiple center-embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics 43 (2), 365392.
Kim, Min-Joo & Jahnke, Nathan. 2011. The meaning of utterance-final even. Journal of English Linguistics 39, 3664.
Kind, Walther. 1994. Satzbegriff und gesprochene Sprache. Lingua 94, 2548.
Kjellmer, Göran. 2003. Hesitation. English Studies 84 (2), 170198.
Koelsch, Stefan, Schulze, Katrin, Sammler, Daniela, Fritz, Thomas, Müller, Karsten & Gruber, Oliver. 2009. Functional architecture of verbal and tonal working memory: an fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping 30 (3), 859873.
Krug, Manfred. 1998. British English is developing a new discourse marker, innit?: A Study in lexicalisation based on social, regional and stylistic variation. Arbeiten aus Anglistik und Amerikanistik 23, 145197.
Lamandella, John T. 1977. The limbic system in human communication. In Whitaker, Haiganoosh & Whitaker, Harry A. (eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics. Vol. 3. London: Academic Press, 157222.
Lambrecht, Knud. 2001. Dislocation. In Haspelmath, Martin, König, Ekkehard, Oesterreicher, Wulf & Raible, Wolfgang (eds.), Language typology and language universals: An international handbook. Vol. 2. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 10501078.
Langacker, Ronald. 1987. Foundations of cognitive grammar. Vol. 1. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Langacker, Ronald. 2008. Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lee, Namhee, Mikesell, Lisa, Joaquin, Anna Dina L., Mates, Andrea W. & Schuman, John H.. 2009. The interactional instinct. The evolution and acquisition of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Leech, Geoffrey. 1983. Principles of pragmatics. London: Longman.
Lehman Blake, Margaret. 2006. Clinical relevance of discourse characteristics after right hemisphere brain damage. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 15 (3), 255267.
Lehman Blake, Margaret. 2010. Communication deficits associated with right hemisphere brain damage. In Damico, Jack S., Muller, Nicole, and Ball, Martin J. (eds.), The handbook of language and speech disorders. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell, 556576.
Lenk, Uta. 1998. Marking discourse coherence: Functions of discourse markers in spoken English. Tübingen: Narr.
Lenker, Ursula. 2010. Argument and rhetoric. Adverbial connectors in the history of English. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Lerner, Gene. 1996. On the ‘semi-permeable’ character of grammatical units in conversation. Conditional entry into the turn space of another speaker. In Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 238276.
Lerner, Gene. 2004. Collaborative turn sequences. In Lerner, Gene (ed.), Conversation analysis. Studies from the first generation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 225256.
Leslie, Alan M. 1987. Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review 94 (4), 412426.
Levelt, William J. M. 1999. Producing spoken language: A blueprint of the speaker. In Brown, Colin M. & Hagoort, Peter (eds.), The neurocognition of language. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 83122.
Lewis, Diana. 2002. Rhetorical motivations for the emergence of discourse particles, with special reference to English of course. In van der Wouden, Ton, Foolen, Ad & van de Craen, Piet (eds.), Particles. Special issue of Belgian Journal of Linguistics 16, 7991.
Levy, Roger. 2011. Probabilistic linguistic expectations, uncertain input, and implications for eye movements in reading. Studies of Psychology and Behavior 9 (1), 5364.
Lindström, Anna. 2009. Projecting nonalignment in conversation. In Sidnell, Jack (ed.), Conversation analysis: Comparative analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 135158.
Linell, Per. 1998. Approaching dialogue: Talk, interaction and contexts in dialogical perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Linell, Per. 2005. The written language bias in linguistics: Its nature, origins and transformations. New York: Routledge.
Linell, Per. 2009. Rethinking language, mind, and world dialogically: Interactional and contextual theories of human sense-making. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Linell, Per. 2014. Interactivities, intersubjectivities and language. On dialogism and phenomenology. Language & Dialogue 4 (2), 165193.
Liu, Haitao. 2008. Dependency distance as a metric of language comprehension difficulty. Journal of Cognitive Sciences 9 (2), 159191.
Local, John & Kelly, John. 1986. Projection and ‘silences’: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies 9, 185204.
Luck, Steven J. & Vogel, Edward K.. 1997. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 390, 279281.
Mackenzie, Catherine & Brady, Marian. 2008. Communication difficulties following right hemisphere stroke: applying evidence to clinical management. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention 2 (4), 235247.
Maclay, Howard & Osgood, Charles E.. 1959. Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word 15, 1944.
Mandler, George. 1975. Memory storage and retrieval: some limits on the reach of attention and consciousness. In Rabbit, Patrick M.A. & Dornic, Stanislav (eds.), Attention and performance V. New York: Academic Press, 150162.
Mandler, George. 1985. Cognitive psychology: An essay in cognitive science. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Marini, Andrea. 2012. Characteristics of narrative discourse processing after damage to the right hemisphere. Seminars in Speech and Language 33 (1), 6878.
Marini, Andrea, Carlomagno, Sergio, Caltagirone, Carlo & Nocentini, Ugo. 2005. The role played by the RH in the organization of complex textual structures. Brain and Language 93, 4654.
Marshall, Robert C. 2000. Speech fluency and aphasia. In Riggenbach, Heidi (ed.), Perspectives on fluency. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 7488.
Marslen-Wilson, William & Tyler, Lorraine Komisarjevsky. 1980. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 8, 171.
Martin, Randi C. & Freedman, Monica. 2001. Short-term retention of lexical-semantic representations: implications for speech production. Memory 9 (4–6), 261280.
Mashal, Nira, Borodkin, Katy, Maliniak, Omer & Faust, Miriam. 2015. Hemispheric involvement in native and non-native comprehension of conventional metaphors. Journal of Neurolinguistics 35, 96108.
Matthiessen, Christian & Thompson, Sandra A.. 1988. The structure of discourse and ‘subordination’. In Haiman, John & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Clause combining in grammar and discourse. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 275329.
McCarthy, Michael & Carter, Ronald. 2001. Ten criteria for a spoken grammar. In Hinkel, Eli & Fotos, Sandra (eds.), New perspectives on grammar teaching in second language classrooms. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 5175.
McDermott, Kathleen B., Petersen, Steven E., Watson, Jason M. & Ojemann, Jeffrey G.. 2003. A procedure for identifying regions preferentially activated by attention to semantic and phonological relations using functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuropsychologia 41 (3), 293303.
McDonald, Skye. 1999. Exploring the process of inference generation in sarcasm: a review of normal and clinical studies. Brain and Language 68 (3), 486506.
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The syntax of silence: Sluicing, islands and the theory of ellipsis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merchant, Jason. 2005. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27 (6), 661738.
Miller, George A. 1956. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review 63 (2), 8197.
Miller, Jim & Weinert, Regina. 2009 [1998]. Spontaneous spoken language. Syntax and Discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mitchell, Rachel L. C. & Crow, Tim J.. 2005. Right hemisphere language functions and schizophrenia: The forgotten hemisphere? Brain 128 (5), 963978.
Mondada, Lorenza. 1995. La construction interactionelle du topic. In Mondada, Lorenza (ed.), Actes du colloque Formes linguistiques er dynamiques interactionelles. Cahiers de l’ILSL 7, Université de Lausanne, 111136.
Mondada, Lorenza. 2009. Emergent focused interactions in public spaces: a systematic analysis of the multimodal achievement of a common interactional space. Journal of Pragmatics 41 (10), 19771997.
Moon, Rosamund E. 1998. Fixed expressions and text: A study of the distribution and textual behavior of fixed expressions in English. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Morel, Mary-Annick. 2007. Le postrhème dans le dialogue oral en français. L’information grammaticale 113, 4046.
Mulder, Jean & Thompson, Sandra A.. 2008. The grammaticization of ‘but’ as a final particle in English conversation. In Laury, Ritva (ed.), Crosslinguistic studies of clause combining: The multifunctionality of conjunctions. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 179204.
Muller, Felipe & Hirst, William. 2010. Resistance to the influences of others: limits to the formation of a collective memory through conversational remembering. Applied Cognitive Psychology 24 (5), 608625.
Musso, Mariacristina, Moro, Andrea, Glauche, Volkmar, Rijntjes, Michel, Reichenbach, Jürgen, Büchel, Christian & Weiler, Cornelius. 2003. Broca’s area and the language instinct. Nature Neuroscience 6 (7), 774781.
Myers, Penelope S. 1994. Communication disorders associated with right-hemisphere brain damage. In Chapey, Roberta (ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (third edition). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 514534.
Myers, Penelope S. 1999. Right hemisphere damage: Disorders of communication and cognition. San Diego, CA: Singular.
Myers, Penelope S. & Lehman Blake, Margaret. 2008. Communication disorders associated with right hemisphere damage. In Chapey, Roberta (Ed.), Language intervention strategies in aphasia and related neurogenic communication disorders (fifth edition). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 963987.
Nairne, James S. 1990. A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition 18 (3), 251269.
Neath, Ian. 2000. Modeling the effects of irrelevant speech on memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7 (3), 403423.
Nefdt, Ryan M. 2016. Linguistic modelling and the scientific enterprise. Language Sciences 54, 4357.
Neininger, Bettina & Pulvermüller, Friedemann. 2003. Word-category specific deficits after lesions in the right hemisphere. Neuropsychologia 41 (1), 5370.
Nelson, Gerald, Wallis, Sean & Aarts, Bas. 2002. Exploring natural language. Working with the British component of the International Corpus of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2015. Parentheticals and the grammar of complementation. In Schneider, Stefan, Glikman, Julie & Mathieu Avanzi, M. (eds.), Parenthetical verbs. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 1338.
Norén, Niklas. 2013. Pivot constructions as methods for perspective shift during turns at talk. Journal of Pragmatics 54 (1), 3556.
Nuyts, Jan. 2001. Epistemic modality, language and conceptualization: A cognitive-pragmatic perspective. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Oberauer, Klaus & Kliegl, Reinhold. 2006. A formal model of capacity limits in working memory. Journal of Memory and Language 55 (4), 601626.
Okada, Rieko, Okuda, Takeshi, Nakano, Naoki, Nishimatsu, Kazuhiko, Fukushima, Hiroyuki et al. 2013. Brain areas associated with sentence processing: A functional MRI study and a lesion study. Journal of Neurolinguistics 26, 470478.
Ouden, Dirk Bart den, Fix, Stephen, Parrish, Todd B. & Thompson, Cynthia K.. 2009. Argument structure effects in action verb naming in static and dynamic conditions. Journal of Neurolinguistics 22, 196215.
Overstreet, Maryann. 1999. Whales, candlelight, and stuff like that. General extenders in English discourse. New York: Oxford University Press.
Oviatt, Sharon. 1995. Predicting spoken disfluencies during human–computer interaction. Computer Speech and Language 9, 1935.
Paltridge, Brian. 2006. Discourse analysis. An introduction. London: Continuum.
Parola, Alberto, Gabbatore, Ilaria, Bosco, Francesca M., Bara, Bruno G., Cossa, Frederico M., Gindri, Patrizia & Sacco, Katiuscia. 2016. Assessment of pragmatic impairment in right hemisphere damage. Journal of Neurolinguistics 39 (1), 1025.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona. 2011. Emergent grammar for all practical purposes: The on-line formatting of left and right dislocations in French conversation. In Auer, Peter & Pfänder, Stefan (eds.), Constructions: Emerging and emergent. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton, 4587.
Phillips, Colin. 2003. Linear order and constituency. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 3790.
Pichler, Heike. 2013. The structure of discourse-pragmatic variation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pichler, Heike & Levey, Stephen. 2011. In search of grammaticalization in synchronic dialect data: General extenders in Northeast England. English Language & Linguistics 15 (3), 441471.
Pickering, Martin J. & Garrod, Simon. 2007. Do people use language production to make predictions during comprehension? Trends in Cognitive Sciences 11 (3), 105110.
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Hirschberg, Julia. 1990. The meaning of intonational contours and the interpretation of discourse. In Cohen, Philip R., Morgan, Jerry & Pollack, Martha E. (eds.), Intentions in communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 271311.
Pomeranz, Anita. 1984. Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In Maxwell Atkison, J. & Heritage, John (eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 57101.
Prat, Chantel S., Long, Debra L. & Baynes, Kathleen. 2007. The representation of discourse in the two hemispheres: An individual differences investigation. Brain and Language 100 (3), 283294.
Purdy, Mary H. 2002. Script knowledge following stroke. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology 10 (3), 173181.
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Ramscar, Michael & Port, Robert F.. 2016. How spoken languages work in the absence of an inventory of discrete units. Language Sciences 53, 5874.
Rinaldi, Maria C., Marangolo, Paola, Baldassarri, Francesca. 2004. Metaphor comprehension in right brain-damaged patients with visuo-verbal and verbal material: A dissociation (re)considered. Cortex 40, 479490.
Rogalsky, Corianne, Matchin, William & Hickok, Gregory. 2008. Broca’s area, sentence comprehension, and working memory: an fMRI study. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 9. (http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/neuro.09.014.2008)
Sabbagh, Mark A. 1999. Communicative intentions and language: evidence from right hemisphere damage and autism. Brain and Language 70 (1), 2969.
Sacks, Harvey. 1984. Notes on methodology. In Atkinson, John & Heritage, J. Maxwell (eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2127.
Sacks, Harvey. 1992. Lectures on conversation. Volume I. ed. by Jefferson, Gail, with Introductions by Schegloff, Emanuel A.. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey. 1995. Lectures on conversation. Volume II. ed. by Jefferson, Gail & Schegloff, Emanuel A.. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sacks, Harvey, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Jefferson, Gail. 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50, 696735.
Saffran, Jenny R., Aslin, Richard N. & Newport, Elissa L.. 1996. Statistical learning by 8- month- old infants. Science 274, 19261928.
Saffran, Jenny R., Johnson, Elizabeth K., Aslin, Richard N. & Newport, Elissa L.. 1999. Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults. Cognition 70 (1), 2752.
Sakai, Katsuyuki, Kitaguchi, Katsuya & Hikosaka, Okihide. 2003. Chunking during human visuomotor sequence learning. Experimental Brain Research 152, 229242.
Santi, Andrea & Grodzinsky, Yosef. 2010. fMRI adaptation dissociates syntactic complexity dimensions. NeuroImage 51, 12851293.
Scarborough, Don L. 1972. Memory for brief visual displays. Cognitive Psychology 3 (3), 408429.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1987. Recycled turn-beginnings: a precise repair mechanism in conversation’s turn-taking organization. In Button, Graham & Lee, John R.E. (eds.), Talk and social organization. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters Ltd., 7085.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1988. Presequences and indirection: Applying speech act theory to ordinary conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 12, 5562.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1996. Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Ochs, Elinor, Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.), Interaction and grammar. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 52133.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 1997. Practices and actions: boundary cases of other-initiated repair. Discourse Processes 23, 499545.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, Emanuel A. & Sacks, Harvey. 1973. Opening up closings. Semiotica VIII (4), 289327.
Schiffrin, Deborah. 1987. Discourse markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schneider, Ulrike. 2014. Frequency, hesitations and chunks. A usage-based study of chunking in English. Freiburg: NIHIN Studies. http://www.freidok.uni-freiburg.de/volltexte/9793/
Schourup, Lawrence. 1985. Common discourse particles in English conversation. New York: Garland.
Schriefers, Herbert, Teruel, E. & Meinshousen, R. M.. 1998. Producing simple sentences: Results from picture-word interference experiments. Journal of Memory and Language 39, 609632.
Sebeok, Thomas A. 1972. Perspectives in zoosemiotics. The Hague: Mouton.
Selting, Margret. 1996. On the interplay of syntax and prosody in the constitution of turn constructional units and turn in conversation. Pragmatics 6 (3), 357388.
Selting, Margret. 1997. Sogenannte ‘Ellipsen’ als interaktiv relevante Konstruktionen? Ein neuer Versuch über die Reichweite und Grenzen des Ellipsenbegriffs für die Analyse gesprochener Sprache in der konversationellen Interaktion. In Schlobinsky, Peter (ed.), Syntax des gesprochenen Deutsch. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 117156.
Selting, Margret. 2000. The construction of units in conversational talk. Language in Society 29, 477517.
Selting, Margret. 2001. Fragments of units as deviant cases of unit-production in conversational talk. In Selting, Margret & Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth (eds.), Studies in Interactional Linguistics. Amstderdam: John Benjamins, 229258.
Sherratt, Sue. 2007. Right brain damage and the verbal expression of emotion: a preliminary investigation. Aphasiology 21 (3/4), 320339.
Sherrat, Sue & Penn, Claire. 1990. Discourse in a right-hemisphere brain-damaged subject. Aphasiology 4 (6), 539560.
Sherratt, Sue & Bryan, Karen. 2012. Discourse production after right brain damage: Gaining a comprehensive picture using a multi-level processing model. Journal of Neurolinguistics 25 (4), 213239.
Shields, Jane. 1991. Semantic-pragmatic disorder: A right hemisphere syndrome? British Journal of Disorders of Communication 26 (3), 383392.
Shriberg, Elizabeth. 1996. Disfluencies in Switchboard. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing 96. Philadelphia: Addendum, 1114.
Sidnell, Jack. 2010. Conversation analysis. An introduction. Malden, MA: Wiley- Blackwell.
Simon-Vandenbergen, Anne-Marie & Aijmer, Karin. 2002. The expectation marker ‘of course’. Languages in Contrast 4, 1343.
Sinclair, John & Mauranen, Anna. 2006. Linear unit grammar. Integrating speech and writing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Singer, Wolf. 2009. Distributed processing and temporal codes in neuronal networks. Cognitive Neurodynamics 3 (3), 189196.
Smith, Aaron. 1966. Speech and other functions after left (dominant) hemispherectomy. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 29, 467471.
Snijders, Tineke M., Vosse, Theo, Kempen, Gerard, van Berkum, Jos A., Petersson, Karl Magnus & Hagoort, Peter. 2009. Retrieval and unification of syntactic structure in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study using word category ambiguity. Cerebral Cortex 19 (7), 14931503.
Speedie, Lynn J., Wertmann, Eliahu, Ta’ir, Judy & Heilman, Kenneth M.. 1993. Disruption of automatic speech following a right basal ganglia lesion. Neurology 43, 17681774.
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre. 1995. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
St. George, Marie, Kutas, Marta, Martinez, Antigona & Sereno, Martin I.. 1999. Semantic integration in reading: Engagement of the RH during discourse processing. Brain 122, 13171325.
Stabler, Edward. 2011. Meta-meta-linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 37 (1/2), 6978.
Stalnaker, Robert. 2002. Common ground. Linguistics and Philosophy 25(5–6), 701721.
Stemmer, Brigitte, Giroux, Francine & Joanette, Yves. 1994. Production and evaluation of requests by right hemisphere brain-damaged individuals. Brain and Language 47 (1), 131.
Stemmer, Brigitte & Joanette, Yves. 1998. The interpretation of narrative discourse of brain damaged individuals within the framework of a multilevel discourse model. In Beeman, Mark & Chiarello, Christine (eds.), Right hemisphere language comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive neuroscience. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 329348.
Stenström, Ana-Brita & Jørgensen, Annette Myre. 2008. La función fática de los apelativos en la conversación juvenil de Madrid y Londres. Actas del III Congreso EDICE, Valencia: Universidad de Valencia, 114.
Stokhof, Martin & van Lambalgen, Michiel. 2011. Abstractions and idealizations: The construction of modern linguistics. Theoretical Linguistics 37 (1/2), 126.
Swan, Michael. 1997. Practical English usage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tagliamonte, Sali & Denis, Derek. 2010. The stuff of change: General extenders in Toronto, Canada. Journal of English Linguistics 38 (4), 335368.
Taglicht, Josef. 2001. Actually, there’s more than meets the eye. English Language and Linguistics 5 (1), 116.
ten Have, Paul. 1990. Methodological issues in conversation analysis. Bulletin de Méthodologie Sociologique 27, 2351.
Tenpenny, Patricia L. 1995. Abstractionist versus episodic theories of repetition priming and word identification. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 3, 339363.
Tettamani, Marco, Rotondi, Irene, Perani, Daniela, Scotti, Giuseppe, Fazio, Ferruccio, Cappa, Stefano F. & Moro, Andrea. 2009. Syntax without language: neurobiological evidence for cross-domain syntactic computations. Cortex 45 (7), 825838.
Thompson, Cynthia K., Bonakdarpour, Borna, Fix, Stephen F., Blumenfeld, Henrike K., Parrish, Todd B., Gitelmann, Darren R. & Mesulam, Marsel. 2007. Neural correlates of verb argument structure processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19 (11), 17531767.
Thompson, Sandra A. 2002. “Object complements” and conversation: Towards a realistic account. Studies in Language 26, 125164.
Thompson, Sandra A. & Mulac, Anthony J.. 1991. The discourse conditions for the use of the complementizer ‘that’ in conversational English. Journal of Pragmatics 15, 237251.
Thompson, Sandra A. & Suzuki, Ryoko. 2011. The grammaticalization of final particles. In Narrog, Heiko & Heine, Bernd (eds.), The Oxford handbook of grammaticalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 668682.
Tompkins, Connie A. 1995. Right hemisphere communication disorders: Theory and management. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.
Tompkins, Connie A. 2008. Theoretical considerations for understanding “Understanding” by adults with right hemisphere brain damage. Perspectives on Neurophysiology and Neurogenetic Speech and Language Disorders 18 (2), 4554.
Tompkins, Connie A. 2012. Rehabilitation for cognitive communication disorders in right hemisphere brain damage. Archive of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 93 (1), S61S69.
Tompkins, Connie A., Fassbinder, Wiltrud, Lehman-Blake, Margaret T. & Baumgaertner, Annette. 2002. The nature and implications of right hemisphere language disorders: Issues in search of answers. In Hillis, Argye E. (ed.), The handbook of adult language disorders: Integrating cognitive neuropsychology, neurology, and rehabilitation. New York: Psychology Press, 429448.
Tottie, Gunnel & Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2006. Tag questions in British and American English. Journal of English Linguistics 34 (4), 283311.
Tottie, Gunnel & Hoffmann, Sebastian. 2009. Tag questions in English – The first century. Journal of English Linguistics 37, 130161.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 1995. The role of the development of discourse markers in a theory of grammaticalization. Paper presented at the ICHL XII, Manchester 1995. <http://www.stanford.edu/~traugott/papers/discourse.pdf> (16.07.2016)
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2010. Grammaticalization. In Luraghi, Silvia & Bubenik, Vit (eds), Continuum Companion to Historical Linguistics. London: Continuum, 269283.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2012. Intersubjectification and clause periphery. In Intersections of Intersubjectivity, Brems, Liselotte, Ghesquière, Lobke & Van de Velde, Freek (eds.), Special issue of English Text Construction 5 (1), 728.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2015. Investigating “periphery” from a functionalist perspective. Linguistics Vanguard 1 (online journal). doi: https://doi.org/10.1515/lingvan-2014-1003.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. 2016. On the rise of types of clause-final pragmatic markers in English. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 17 (1), 2654.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Dasher, Richard B.. 2002. Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme. 2010. Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. How do they intersect? In Traugott, Elizabeth C. & Trousdale, Graeme (eds.), Gradience, gradualness and grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1944.
Vallar, Giuseppe & Baddeley, Alan. 1987. Phonological short-term store and sentence processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology 4 (4), 417438.
Van Berkum, Jos A., Brown, Colin M., Zwitserlood, Pienie, Kooijman, Valesca & Hagoort, Peter. 2005. Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: Evidence from ERPs and reading times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 31 (3), 443467.
Van Lancker, Diana. 1990. The neurology of proverbs. Behavioral Neurology 3, 169187.
Van Lancker, Diana. 1993. Nonpropositional speech in aphasia. In Blanken, Gerhard, Dittmann, Jürgen, Grimm, Hannelore, Marshall, John C. & Wallesch, Claus-W. (eds.), Linguistic disorders and pathologies. An international handbook. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 215224.
Van Lancker, Diana. 1997. Rags to riches: Our increasing appreciation of cognitive and communicative abilities of the human right cerebral hemisphere. Brain and Language 57 (1), 111.
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana. 2001. Preserved formulaic expressions in a case of transcortical sensory aphasia compared to incidence in normal everyday speech. Brain and Language 79 (1), 3841.
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana. 2004. When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: Toward a dual-process model of language. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 39, 144.
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana. 2009. Formulaic and novel language in a “dual process” model of language competence: Evidence from surveys, speech samples, and schemata. In Corrigan, Roberta, Moravcsik, Edith A., Ouali, Hamid & Wheatley, Kathleen M. (eds.), Formulaic language. Volume 2: Acquisition, Loss, Psychological Reality, and Functional Explanations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 445470.
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana. 2012. Formulaic language and language disorders. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics 32, 6280.
Van Lancker, Diana & Cummings, Jeffrey L.. 1999. Expletives: Neurolinguistic and neurobehavioral perspectives on swearing. Brain Research Review 31, 83104.
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana & Postman, Whitney A.. 2006. Formulaic expressions in spontaneous speech of left- and right-hemisphere-damaged subjects. Aphasiology 20 (5), 411426.
Van Lancker Sidtis, Diana, Pachana, Nancy, Cummings, Jeffrey L. & Sidtis, John J.. 2006. Dysprosodic speech following basal ganglia insult: Toward a conceptual framework for the study of cerebral representation of prosody. Brain and Language 97 (2), 135153.
Videsott, Gerda, Herrnberger, Bärbel, Hoenig, Klaus, Schilly, Edgar, Grothe, Jo, Wiater, Werner, Spitzer, Manfred & Kiefer, Markus. 2010. Speaking in multiple languages: Neural correlates of language proficiency in multilingual word production. Brain & Language 113, 103112.
Vigneau, Mathieu, Beaucousin, Virginie, Hervé, Pierre Y., Jobard, Gael, Petit, Laurent, Crivello, Fabrice, Mellet, Emmanuel, Zago, Laure, Mazoyer, Bernard & Tzourio-Mazoyer, Nathalie. 2011. What is right-hemiphere contribution to phonological, lexico-semantic, and sentence processing? Insights from meta-analysis. Neuroimage 54 (1), 577593.
Walker, Gareth. 2007. On the design and use of pivots in everyday English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 39 (12), 22172243.
Wårvik, Brita. 1995. The ambiguous adverbial/conjunction þa and þonne in Middle English: A discouse-pragmatic study of then and when in early English Saints’ Lives. In Jucker, Andreas (ed.), Historical pragmatics: Pragmatic developments in the history of English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 345357.
Wegener, Heide. 2000. Da, denn, weil – der Kampf der Konjunktionen. Zur Grammatikalisierung im kausalen Bereich. In Thieroff, Rolf (ed.), Deutsche Grammatik in Theorie und Praxis. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 6981.
Weinert, Regina. 2012. Complement clauses in spoken German and English: Syntax, deixis, and discourse-pragmatics. Folia Linguistica 46 (1), 233265.
Weiß, Sabine. 1997. EEG-Kohärenz und Sprachverarbeitung. Die funktionelle Verkopplung von Gehirnregionen während der Verarbeitung unterschiedlicher Nomina. In Rickheit, Gert (ed.), Studien zur klinischen Linguistik. Modelle, Methoden, Interventionen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 125146.
Wharton, Tim. 2003. Interjections, language, and the ‘showing/saying’ continuum. Pragmatics & Cognition 11 (1), 3991.
Whitaker, Harry A. 1976. A case of isolation of the speech functions. In Whitaker, Haiganoosh & Whitaker, Harry A. (eds.), Studies in neurolinguistics. Vol. 2. London: Academic Press, 158.
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1992. The semantics of interjection. Journal of Pragmatics 18, 159192.
Wilkins, David P. 1992. Interjections as deictics. Journal of Pragmatics 18, 119158.
Wilson, Peter. 2000. Mind the gap. Harlow: Pearson.
Wray, Alison. 2002. Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wray, Alison & Perkins, Michael. 2000. The functions of formulaic language: An integrated model. Language & Communication 20 (1), 128.
Wright, Paul, Stamatakis, Emmanuel A. & Tyler, Lorraine K.. 2012. Differentiating hemipheric contributions to syntax and semantics in patients with left-hemisphere lesions. Journal of Neuroscience 32 (24), 81498157.
Zangwill, Oliver. 1967. Speech and the minor hemisphere. Acta Neurologica et Psychiatrica Belgica 67, 10131020.
Zifonun, Gisela, Hoffmann, Ludger & Strecker, Bruno. 1997. Grammatik der deutschen Sprache. Vol. 1–3. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.