Skip to main content
×
Home
States, Nations, and the Great Powers
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 23
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Mandelbaum, Moran M. 2016. State, nation, society: the congruency fantasy and in/security of the body-national/social. Critical Studies on Security, p. 1.


    Miller, Benjamin and Saltzman, Ilai Z 2016. Beyond the three ‘isms’: Rethinking IR and the post-cold war order. International Politics, Vol. 53, Issue. 3, p. 385.


    Cederman, Lars-Erik 2015. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Race, Ethnicity, and Nationalism.


    Miller, Benjamin 2015. Stateness, National Self-determination and War and Peace in the Twenty-first Century. Ethnopolitics, Vol. 14, Issue. 5, p. 531.


    Thompson, William R. 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.


    Aran, Amnon and Ginat, Rami 2014. Revisiting Egyptian Foreign Policy towards Israel under Mubarak: From Cold Peace to Strategic Peace. Journal of Strategic Studies, Vol. 37, Issue. 4, p. 556.


    Maass, Matthias 2014. Small states: Survival and proliferation. International Politics, Vol. 51, Issue. 6, p. 709.


    Mandelbaum, Moran M. 2014. The Gellnerian modality revisited: towards a ‘genealogy’ of cultural homogenization and nation-state congruency. Ethnic and Racial Studies, Vol. 37, Issue. 11, p. 2014.


    Wimmer, Andreas 2014. War. Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 40, Issue. 1, p. 173.


    Kardaş, Şaban 2013. Turkey: A Regional Power Facing a Changing International System. Turkish Studies, Vol. 14, Issue. 4, p. 637.


    Mandelbaum, Moran M 2013. One state-one nation: the naturalisation of nation–state congruency in IR theory. Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 16, Issue. 4, p. 514.


    Miller, Benjamin 2012. Regional threats and global management of conflicts in regions: The case of the US in the Middle East. International Politics, Vol. 49, Issue. 3, p. 346.


    MILLER, BENJAMIN 2012. Does Democratization Pacify the State? The Cases of Germany and Iraq1. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 56, Issue. 3, p. 455.


    Resnick, Uri 2012. Explaining post-independence conflict. Dynamics of Asymmetric Conflict, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 31.


    Levin, Dov H. and Miller, Benjamin 2011. Why Great Powers Expand in Their Own Neighborhood: Explaining the Territorial Expansion of the United States 1819–1848. International Interactions, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 229.


    RYNHOLD, JONATHAN 2011. The German question in Central and Eastern Europe and the long peace in Europe after 1945: an integrated theoretical explanation. Review of International Studies, Vol. 37, Issue. 01, p. 249.


    Abulof, Uriel 2009. “Small Peoples”: The Existential Uncertainty of Ethnonational Communities. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 53, Issue. 1, p. 227.


    Gillis, Stacy 2008. Noticeboard. Journal of War & Culture Studies, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. 201.


    Miller, Benjamin 2008. States, Nations, and Regional War: A Response to Toft, Saideman and Wolff. Ethnopolitics, Vol. 7, Issue. 4, p. 475.


    Miller, Benjamin 2008. States, Nations, and Regional War. Ethnopolitics, Vol. 7, Issue. 4, p. 445.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    States, Nations, and the Great Powers
    • Online ISBN: 9780511491566
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491566
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Why are some regions prone to war while others remain at peace? What conditions cause regions to move from peace to war and vice versa? This book offers a novel theoretical explanation for the differences and transitions between war and peace. The author distinguishes between 'hot' and 'cold' outcomes, depending on intensity of the war or the peace, and then uses three key concepts (state, nation, and the international system) to argue that it is the specific balance between states and nations in different regions that determines the hot or warm outcomes: the lower the balance, the higher the war proneness of the region, while the higher the balance, the warmer the peace. The theory of regional war and peace developed in this book is examined through case-studies of the post-1945 Middle East, the Balkans and South America in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, and post-1945 Western Europe.

Reviews

'Benjamin Miller's States, Nations and the Great Powers is a superb book. It advances the important thesis that to understand the prospects for peace or war in a given region, we need to examine the interaction between the political conditions that obtain within the region and the actions of great powers from outside the region. Miller's book is masterful in its integration of international relations theory and the comparative method. It will be of interest to a wide range of readers, from undergraduates and graduate students to scholars, and from policy-makers to journalists to citizens, indeed to anyone who is interested in peace and security in the modern era.'

Joseph M. Grieco - Duke University

'This substantial and intricate book embeds a traditional realist analysis of war and peace in a novel regional framework highlighting variations in the revisionist orientation and political incoherence of regional states. The Middle East and the Balkans, as well as Latin America and Western Europe, provide the empirical material for this careful and challenging argument. Miller adds important new insights to the analysis of regions in world politics.'

Peter J. Katzenstein - Cornell University

'States, Nations and the Great Powers is an ambitious and original work of scholarship, which seeks to explain regional war and peace by focusing on whether regional political boundaries reflect national aspirations. Miller argues convincingly that both the impact of external great powers and the relevance of realist and liberal theory are conditional on this 'state to nation balance.''

Robert O. Keohane - Princeton University

'The striking variation in the propensity toward war and peace in the different regions of the world is enormously important for our understanding of international conflict but neglected by most conflict analysts. By focusing on the degree of congruence between the territorial boundaries of states and the less formal boundaries of peoples, Miller provides a powerful explanation for this intriguing puzzle.'

Jack S. Levy - Rutgers University

'A rich and rewarding study of the causes and cures of regional conflicts.'

Ken Waltz - Columbia University in the City of New York

‘Benjamin Miller has written an ambitious book explaining why some regions of the world are more peaceful than others. His claim that it is due to a combination of factors relating to nationalism and great-power competition is innovative as well as compelling. This important book will be widely read and widely cited.’

John J. Mearsheimer - University of Chicago

'Debates about the causes of war have tended to focus on conflict among the great powers and the global balance of power. This important study asserts that the real puzzles of war and peace exist on a lesser scale within regions. … Although highly theoretical, the book is full of useful insights about potential pathways toward regional peacemaking, particularly in regard to the Middle East.'

Source: Foreign Affairs

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


EmanuelAdler, and MichaelBarnett, (eds.) 1998. Pluralistic Security Communities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

FouadAjami, 1978/9. “The End of Pan-Arabism,” Foreign Affairs 57(2): 355–373.

MatthewAnderson, 1966. The Eastern Question, 1774–1923: A Study in International Relations. New York: St. Martin's Press.

IvanArreguin-Toft, 2005. How the Weak Win Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Robert J.Art, 1996. “Why Western Europe Needs the United States and NATO,” Political Science Quarterly 111(1): 1–39.

SamuelBarkin, and BruceCronin, 1994. “The State and the Nation: Changing Norms and the Rules of Sovereignty in International Relations,” International Organization 48(1): 107–130.

MichaelBarnett, 1995. “Sovereignty and Nationalism in the Arab World,” International Organization 49(3): 479–510.

MichaelBarnett, 1996/7. “Regional Security After the Gulf War,” Political Science Quarterly 111(4): 597–618.

C. J.Bartlett, 1996. Peace, War and the European Powers, 1814–1914. London: Macmillan.

LeslieBethell, (ed.) 1989. Brazil: Empire and Republic, 1822–1930. New York: Cambridge University Press.

LeslieBethell, (ed.) 1993. Chile Since Independence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

RichardBetts, 1999. “Must War Find a Way? A Review Essay,” International Security 24(2): 166–198.

Stuart A.Bremer, 1992. “Dangerous Dyads: Conditions Affecting the Likelihood of Interstate War, 1816–1965,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 36(2): 309–341.

Stephen G.Brooks, 1997. “Dueling Realisms,” International Organization 51(3): 445–477.

RogersBrubaker, 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

RexBrynen, 1991. “Palestine and the Arab State System: Permeability, State Consolidation, and the Intifada,” Canadian Journal of Political Science 24(3): 595–621.

HedleyBull, 1977. The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.

AndrewButfoy, 1997. “Offense–Defense Theory: The Problem with Marginalizing the Context,” Contemporary Security Policy 18(3): 38–58.

BarryBuzan, 1984. “Peace, Power and Security: Contending Concepts in the Study of International Relations,” Journal of Peace Research 21(2): 109–125.

BarryBuzan, 1993. “From International System to International Society: Structural Realism and Regime Theory Meet the English School,” International Organization 47(3): 327–352.

BarryBuzan, and OleWaever, 2003. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

John A.Vasquez, 1993. The War Puzzle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

John A.Vasquez, 1995. “Why Do Neighbors Fight? Proximity, Interaction or Territoriality,” Journal of Peace Research 32(3): 277–293.

RaimoVayrynen, 1984. “Regional Conflict Formations: An Intractable Problem of International Relations?,” Journal of Peace Research 21(4): 337–359.

Barbara F.Walter, 1997. “The Critical Barrier to Civil War Settlement,” International Organization 51(3): 335–364.

Barbara F.Walter, 2003. “Explaining the Intractability of Territorial Conflict,” International Studies Review 5(4): 137–153.

Michael C.Webb, and Stephen D.Krasner, 1989. “Hegemonic Stability Theory: An Empirical Assessment,” Review of International Studies 15: 183–198.

MyronWeiner, 1971. “The Macedonian Syndrome: A Historical Model of International Relations and Political Development,” World Politics 23: 665–683.

AlexanderWendt, 1987. “The Agent–Structure Problem in International Relations,” International Organization 41(3): 335–370.

AlexanderWendt, 1992. “Anarchy Is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46(2): 391–425.

ElizabethWiskemann, 1956. “The Saar Moves Toward Germany,” Foreign Affairs 34(2): 287–297.

William C.Wohlforth, 1999. “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” International Security 24(1): 5–41.

DouglasWoodwell, 2004. “Unwelcome Neighbors: Shared Ethnicity and International Conflict During the Cold War,” International Studies Quarterly 48(1): 197–223.

HollyWyatt-Walter, 1997. The European Community and the Security Dilemma 1979–1992. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Mark W.Zacher, 2001. “The Territorial Integrity Norm: International Boundaries and the Use of Force,” International Organization 55(2): 215–250.

FareedZakaria, 1992. “Realism and Domestic Politics: A Review Essay,” International Security 17(1): 177–198.

FareedZakaria, 1997. “The Rise of Illiberal Democracy,” Foreign Affairs 76(6): 22–43.

PhilipZelikow, 1992. “The New Concert of Europe,” Survival 34(2): 12–30.

RaymondHinnebusch, 2003. The International Politics of the Middle East. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

K. J.Holsti, 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order 1648–1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

K. J.Holsti, 1996. War, the State, and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Samuel P.Huntington, 1993. “The Clash of Civilizations,” Foreign Affairs 72(3): 22–49.

Samuel P.Huntington, 1999. “The Lonely Superpower,” Foreign Affairs 78(2): 35–49.

Paul K.Huth, 1996. Standing Your Ground: Territorial Disputes and International Conflict. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

G. JohnIkenberry, 1989. “Rethinking the Origins of American Hegemony,” Political Science Quarterly 104: 375–400.

Robert W.Jackman, 1993. Power Without Force: The Political Capacity of Nation States. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Robert H.Jackson, and Carl G.Rosberg, 1982. “Why Africa's Weak States Persist: The Empirical and the Juridical in Statehood,” World Politics 35(1): 1–24.

KeithJaggers, 1992. “War and the Three Faces of Power: War Making and State Making in Europe and the Americas,” Comparative Political Studies 25(1): 26–62.

BarbaraJelavich, 1983. History of the Balkans: Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

BrianJenkins, and Spyros A.Sofos, (eds.) 1996. Nation and Identity in Contemporary Europe. New York: Routledge.

RobertJervis, 1978. “Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma,” World Politics 30(2): 167–214.

JosefJoffe, 1992. “Collective Security and the Future of Europe,” Survival 34: 36–50.

Arie M.Kacowicz, 1995. “Explaining Zones of Peace: Democracies as Satisfied Powers?,” Journal of Peace Research 32(3): 265–276.

KorinaKagan, 1997/8. “The Myth of the European Concert: The Realist–Institutionalist Debate and Great Power Behavior in the Eastern Question, 1821–1841,” Security Studies 7(2): 1–57.

RogerKanet, and EdwardKolodziej, (eds.) 1991. The Cold War as Cooperation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

EfraimKarsh, 1997. “Cold War, Post-Cold War: Does It Make a Difference in the Middle East?,” Review of International Studies 23: 271–291.

EfraimKarsh, and InariKarsh, 1996. “Reflections on Arab Nationalism,” Middle Eastern Studies 32(4): 367–392.

PeterKatzenstein, 1996b. “Regionalism in Comparative Perspective,” Cooperation and Conflict 31(2): 123–159.

Peter J.Katzenstein, and NobuoOkawara, 2001/2. “Japan, Asian-Pacific Security, and the Case for Analytical Eclecticism,” International Security 26(3): 153–185.

Chaim D.Kaufmann, 1998. “When All Else Fails: Ethnic Population Transfers and Partitions in the Twentieth Century,” International Security 23(2): 120–156.

Chaim D.Kaufmann, 2005. “Rational Choice and Progress in the Study of Ethnic Conflict: A Review Essay,” Security Studies 14(1): 167–194.

PaulKeal, 1983. Unspoken Rules and Superpower Dominance. London: Macmillan.

Aaron L.Friedberg, 1993/4. “Ripe for Rivalry: Prospects for Peace in a Multipolar Asia,” International Security 18(3): 5–33.

HillelFrisch, 2002a. “Explaining Third World Security Structures,” Journal of Strategic Studies 25(3): 161–190.

HillelFrisch, 2002b. “Fuzzy Nationalism: The Case of Jordan,” Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 8(4): 86–103.

Gaddis, John Lewis 1992. “The Cold War, the Long Peace, and the Future,” in Michael J.Hogan, (ed.) 1992. The End of the Cold War: Its Meaning and Implications.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 21–38.

V. P.Gagnon, 1994/5. “Ethnic Nationalism and International Conflict: The Case of Serbia,” International Security 19(3): 130–166.

CharlesGati, 1992. “From Sarajevo to Sarajevo,” Foreign Affairs 71(4): 64–79.

Gregory F.Gause, 1999. “Systemic Approaches to Middle East International Relations,” International Studies Review 1(1): 11–31.

Daniel S.Geller, and David J.Singer, 1998. Nations at War: A Scientific Study of International Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

AndreGeraud, 1947. “Can France Again be a Great Power?,” Foreign Affairs 26(1): 24–35.

FawazGerges, 1995. “Egyptian–Israeli Relations Turn Sour,” Foreign Affairs 74(3): 69–78.

Eugene, PressGholz, , G. Daryl and Harvey M.Sapolsky, 1997. “Come Home, America: The Strategy of Restraint in the Face of Temptation,” International Security 21(4): 5–48.

John R.Gillingham, 1991. Coal, Steel and the Rebirth of Europe, 1945–1955.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

RobertGilpin, 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Charles L.Glaser, 1994/5. “Realists as Optimists: Cooperation as Self-Help,” International Security 19(3): 50–90.

Charles L.Glaser, 1997. “The Security Dilemma Revisited,” World Politics 50(1): 171–201.

Charles L.Glaser, and ChaimKaufmann, 1998. “What Is the Offense–Defense Balance and How Can We Measure It?,” International Security 22(4): 44–82.

Kristian SkredeGleditsch, 2002. All International Politics Is Local: The Diffusion of Conflict, Integration and Democratization.Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

N. P.Gleditsch, 1995. “Democracy and the Future of European Peace,” European Journal of International Relations 1(4): 539–571.

Charles S.Gochman, et al. 1996/7. “Correspondence: Democracy and Peace,” International Security 21(3): 177–187.

Hein E.Goemans, 2000. War and Punishment: The Causes of War Termination and the First World War. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

GaryGoertz, and Paul F.Diehl, 1992a. “The Empirical Importance of Enduring Rivalries,” International Interactions 18: 151–163.

GaryGoertz, and Paul F.Diehl, 1992b. Territorial Changes and International Conflict. London: Routledge.

JamesGoldgeier, and MichaelMcFaul, 1992. “A Tale of Two Worlds: Core and Periphery in the Post-Cold War Era,” International Organization 46(2): 467–491.

David C.Gompert, 1994. “How to Defeat Serbia,” Foreign Affairs 73(4): 30–49.

JoanneGowa, 1995. “Democratic States and International Disputes,” International Organization 49(3): 511–522.

Joseph M.Grieco, 1988. “Anarchy and the Limits of Cooperation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism,” International Organization 42(3): 485–507.

AlfredGrosser, 1963. “France and Germany in the Atlantic Community,” International Organization 17(3): 550–569.

JohnHall, (ed.) 1998. The State of the Nation: Ernest Gellner and the Theory of Nationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

FredHalliday, 1991b. “The Gulf War and Its Aftermath: First Reflections,” International Affairs 67: 223–234.

ChrisHedges, 1999. “Kosovo's Next Masters?,” Foreign Affairs 78(3): 24–42.

GuntherHellmann, 2003. “Are Dialogue and Synthesis Possible in International Relations?,” International Studies Review 5: 123–153.

Paul R.Hensel, 2001. “Contentious Issues and World Politics: The Management of Territorial Claims in the Americas, 1816–1992,” International Studies Quarterly 45(1): 81–109.

JeffreyHerbst, 1989. “The Creation and Maintenance of National Boundaries in Africa,” International Organization 43(4): 673–692.

John H.Herz, 1950. “Idealist Internationalism and the Security Dilemma,” World Politics 2: 157–180.

Robert O.Keohane, and Lisa L.Martin, 1995. “The Promise of Institutionalist Theory,” International Security 20(1): 39–51.

Robert O.Keohane, and Joseph S.Nye, (eds.) 1972. Transnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

DavidKinsella, 1994. “Conflict in Context: Arms Transfers and Third World Rivalries During the Cold War,” American Journal of Political Science 38(3): 557–581.

Stephen A.Kocs, 1995. “Territorial Disputes and Interstate War, 1945–1987,” Journal of Politics 57(1): 159–175.

PaulKorany, Bahgat, Noble, and RexBrynen, (eds.) 1993. The Many Faces of National Security in the Arab World. London: Macmillan.

KeithKrause, 1996. “Insecurity and State Formation in the Global Military Order,” European Journal of International Relations 2(3): 319–354.

RadhaKumar, 1997. “The Troubled History of Partition,” Foreign Affairs 76(1): 22–34.

DianeKunz, 1997. “The Marshall Plan Reconsidered: A Complex of Motives,” Foreign Affairs 76(3): 162–170.

Charles A.Kupchan, 1998. “After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the Sources of a Stable Multipolarity,” International Security 23(2): 40–79.

Charles A.Kupchan, and Clifford A.Kupchan, 1991. “Concerts, Collective Security, and the Future of Europe,” International Security 16: 114–161.

Eric J.Labs, 1997. “Beyond Victory: Offensive Realism and the Expansion of War Aims,” Security Studies 6(4): 1–49.

DavidLaitin, 2004. “Ethnic Unmixing and Civil War,” Security Studies 13(4): 350–365.

S. F.Larrabee, 1992. “Instability and Change in the Balkans,” Survival 34: 31–49.

ChristopherLayne, 1993. “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise,” International Security 17(4): 5–51.

JeffreyLegro, and AndrewMoravcsik, 1999. “Is Anybody Still a Realist?,” International Security 24: 5–55.

DouglasLemke, 2002. Regions of War and Peace. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Levy, Jack S. 1989c. “Domestic Politics and War,” in Robert I.Rotberg, and Theodore K.Rabb, (eds.) 1989. The Origin and Prevention of Major Wars. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 79–100.

Jack S.Levy, 1998. “The Causes of War and the Conditions of Peace,” Annual Review of Political Science 1(1): 139–165.

Jack S.Levy, and R.Gochal, Joseph 2001. “Democracy and Preventive War: Israel and the 1956 Sinai Campaign,” Security Studies 11(2): 1–49.

MarcLevy, 1995. “Is the Environment a National Security Issue?,” International Security 20(2): 35–62.

Roy E.Licklider, 1976/7. “Soviet Control of Eastern Europe: Morality Versus American National Interests,” Political Science Quarterly 91(4): 619–624.

Roy E.Licklider, 1995. “The Consequences of Negotiated Settlements in Civil Wars, 1945–1993,” American Political Science Review 89(3): 681–690.

MichaelLind, 1994. “In Defence of Liberal Nationalism,” Foreign Affairs 73(3): 87–99.

RonaldLinden, 2000. “Putting on Their Sunday Best: Romania, Hungary, and the Puzzle of Peace,” International Studies Quarterly 44: 119–151.

Steven E.Lobell, and PhilipMauceri, (eds.) 2004. Ethnic Conflict and International Politics. New York: Palgrave.

Ian S.Lustick, 1997. “The Absence of Middle Eastern Great Powers: Political ‘Backwardness’ in Historical Perspective,” International Organization 51(4): 653–683.

Edward N.Luttwak, 1995. “Toward Post-Heroic Warfare,” Foreign Affairs 74(3): 109–122.

Sean M.Lynn-Jones, 1995. “Offense–Defense Theory and Its Critics,” Security Studies 4: 660–694.

NeilMacFarlane, and Thomas G.Weiss, 1992. “Regional Organizations and Regional Security,” Security Studies 2(1): 6–37.

RobertMandel, 1980. “Roots of the Modern Interstate Border Dispute,” Journal of Conflict Resolution 24(3): 427–454.

MichaelMandelbaum, 1988. The Fate of Nations. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Brian S.Mandell, 1990. “Anatomy of a Confidence Building Regime: Egyptian–Israeli Security Co-operation, 1973–1979,” International Journal 45(2): 202–223.

Brian S.Mandell, and Brian W.Tomlin, 1991. “Mediation in the Development of Norms to Manage Conflict: Kissinger in the Middle East,” Journal of Peace Research 28(1): 43–56.

MichaelMann, 1993. The Sources of Social Power, vol. Ⅱ, The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Edward D.Mansfield, and JackSnyder, 2002. “Democratic Transitions, Institutional Strength and War,” International Organization 56: 297–337.

ZeevMaoz, 1996. Domestic Sources of Global Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Maoz, Zeev 2001. “Democratic Networks: Connecting National, Dyadic, and Systemic Levels of Analysis in the Study of Democracy and War,” in ZeevMaoz, and AzarGat, (eds.) 2001. War in a Changing World. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 143–182.

MichaelMastanduno, 1997. “Preserving the Unipolar Moment: Realist Theories and US Grand Strategy After the Cold War,” International Security 21(4): 49–88.

JamesMayall, 1990. Nationalism and International Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

SusanMcMillan, 1997. “Interdependence and Conflict,” Mershon International Studies Review 41 (supplement 1): 33–58.

John J.Mearsheimer, 1990. “Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War,” International Security 15(1): 5–56.

John J.Mearsheimer, 1994/5. “The False Promise of International Institutions,” International Security 19(3): 5–49.

BenjaminMiller, 1992a. “Explaining Great Power Cooperation in Conflict Management,” World Politics 45: 1–46.

BenjaminMiller, 1992b. “A ‘New World Order’: From Balancing to Hegemony, Concert or Collective Security?,” International Interactions 18: 1–33.

BenjaminMiller, 1994a. “Explaining the Emergence of Great Power Concerts,” Review of International Studies 20: 327–348.

BenjaminMiller, 1995. “International Systems and Regional Security: From Competition to Cooperation, Dominance or Disengagement?,” Journal of Strategic Studies 18(2): 52–100.

BenjaminMiller, 1996. “Competing Realist Perspectives on Great Power Crisis Behavior,” Security Studies 5(3): 309–357.

BenjaminMiller, 1997. “The Great Powers and Regional Peacemaking: Patterns in the Middle East and Beyond,” Journal of Strategic Studies 20(1): 103–142.

BenjaminMiller, 1998. “The Logic of US Military Intervention in the Post-Cold War Era,” Contemporary Security Policy 19(3): 72–109.

BenjaminMiller, and KorinaKagan, 1997. “The Great Powers and Regional Conflicts: Eastern Europe and the Balkans from the Post-Napoleonic Era to the Post-Cold War Era,” International Studies Quarterly 41(1): 51–85.

Christopher R.Mitchell, 1981. The Structure of International Conflict. New York: St. Martin's Press.

AndrewMoravcsik, 1997. “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,” International Organization 51(4): 513–554.

AndrewMoravcsik, 2003. “Theory Synthesis in International Relations: Real Not Metaphysical,” International Studies Review 5(1): 131–136.

Bernard S.Morris, 1994. “The End of Ideology, the End of Utopia and the End of History — On the Occasion of the End of the USSR,” History of European Ideas 19(4): 699–708.

J. P.Nettl, 1968. “The State as a Conceptual Variable,” World Politics 20: 559–592.

Iver B.Neumann, (ed.)1992. Regional Great Powers in International Politics. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Iver B.Neumann, (ed.)1994. “A Region-Building Approach to Northern Europe,” Review of International Studies 20(1): 53–74.

Joseph S.Nye, 1996. “Conflicts After the Cold War,” Washington Quarterly 19(1): 5–24.

RogerOwen, 1992. State, Power and Politics in the Making of the Modern Middle East. New York: Routledge.

RolandParis, 1997. “Peacebuilding and the Limits of Liberal Internationalism,” International Security 22(2): 54–89.

RolandParis, 2004. At War's End: Building Peace After Civil Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doh ChullShin, 1994. “On the Third Wave of Democratization: A Synthesis and Evaluation of Recent Theory and Research,” World Politics 47(1): 135–170.

David J.Singer, 1961. “The Level of Analysis Problem,” World Politics 14(1): 77–92.

FredSingleton, 1985. A Short History of the Yugoslav Peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

JeromeSlater, 1990/1. “The Superpowers and an Arab–Israeli Political Settlement: The Cold War Years,” Political Science Quarterly 105(4): 557–578.

Anthony D.Smith, 1998. Nationalism and Modernism.London: Routledge.

DuncanSnidal, 1985. “The Limits of Hegemonic Stability,” International Organization 39(4): 579–614.

Glenn H.Snyder, 2002. “Mearsheimer's World-Offensive Realism and the Struggle for Security: A Review Essay,” International Security 27(1): 149–173.

JackSnyder, 1990. “Averting Anarchy in the New Europe,” International Security 14(4): 5–41.

JackSnyder, and KarenBallentine, 1996. “Nationalism and the Marketplace of Ideas,” International Security 21(2): 5–40.

HarveyStarr, and Benjamin A.Most, 1976. “The Substance and Study of Borders in International Relations Research,” International Studies Quarterly 20(4): 581–620.

Jeffrey W.Taliaferro, 2000/1. “Security Seeking Under Anarchy: Defensive Realism Revisited,” International Security 25(3): 128–161.

William R.Thompson, 1973. “The Regional Subsystem: A Conceptual Explication and a Propositional Inventory,” International Studies Quarterly 17: 89–117.

William R.Thompson, 1996. “Democracy and Peace: Putting the Cart Before the Horse?,” International Organization 50(1): 141–174.

Tilly, Charles 1985. “War Making and State Making as Organized Crime,” in Peter B.Evans, et al. (eds.) 1985. Bringing the State Back In.New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 169–191.

Monica DuffyToft, 2002/3. “Indivisible Territory, Geographic Concentration, and Ethnic War,” Security Studies 12(2): 82–119.

Peter F.Trumbore, 2003. “Victims or Aggressors? Ethno-Political Rebellion and Use of Force in Militarized Interstate Disputes,” International Studies Quarterly 47(2): 183–202.

T. V.Paul, 1994. Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation by Weaker Powers. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Pearson, Frederic, Baumann, Robert and Pickering, Jeffrey 1994. “Military Intervention and Realpolitik,” in FrankWayman, and Paul F.Diehl, (eds.) 1994. Reconstructing Realpolitik. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 205–226.

PaulPillar, 1983. Negotiating Peace: War Termination as a Bargaining Process. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

MarkPinson, 1975. “Ottoman Bulgaria in the First Tanzimat Period: The Revolts in Nish (1841) and Vidin (1850),” Middle Eastern Studies 11(2): 103–146.

Bruce D.Porter, 1984. The USSR in Third World Conflicts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barry R.Posen, 1993a. “Nationalism, the Mass Army, and Military Power,” International Security 18(2): 80–124.

Barry R.Posen, 1996. “Military Responses to Refugee Disasters,” International Security 21(1): 72–111.

Barry R.Posen, and Andrew L.Ross, 1996/7. “Competing Visions for US Grand Strategy,” International Security 21(3): 5–53.

RobertPowell, 1994. “Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist–Neoliberal Debate,” International Organization 48(2): 313–344.

Donald J.Puchala, 1970. “Integration and Disintegration in Franco-German Relations, 1954–1965,” International Organization 24(2): 183–208.

AlfredRieber, 2000. “Repressive Population Transfers in Central, Eastern and South-Eastern Europe: A Historical Overview,” Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 16: 1–27.

Norrin M.Ripsman, 2005. “Two Stages of Transition from a Region of War to a Region of Peace: Realist Transition and Liberal Endurance,” International Studies Quarterly 49(4): 669–694

Norrin M.Ripsman, and JeanBlanchard, 1996/7. “Commercial Liberalism Under Fire: Evidence from 1914 and 1936,” Security Studies 6(2): 5–50.

GideonRose, 1998. “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy,” World Politics 51(1): 144–172.

Richard N.Rosecrance, 1991. “Regionalism and the Post-Cold War Era,” International Journal 46: 373–393.

BarryRubin, 2006. “Getting to Arab Democracy: Dealing with Communism,” Journal of Democracy 17(1): 51–62.

ChristopherRudolph, 2003. “Globalization and Security: Migration and Evolving Conceptions of Security in Statecraft and Scholarship,” Security Studies 13(1): 1–32.

Dankwart A.Rustow, 1970. “Transitions to Democracy,” Comparative Politics 2(3): 337–363.

Stephen M.Saideman, 1997. “Explaining the International Relations of Secessionist Conflicts: Vulnerability Versus Ethnic Ties,” International Organization 51(4): 721–753.

Philippe C.Schmitter, 1969. “Three Neo-Functional Hypotheses About Regional Integration,” International Organization 23(1): 161–166.

PaulSchroeder, 1994. “Historical Reality vs. Neo-Realist Theory,” International Security 19(1): 108–148.

RandallSchweller, 1994. “Bandwagoning for Profit: Bringing the Revisionist State Back In,” International Security 19: 72–107.

RandallSchweller, 1996. “Neorealism's Status Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma?,” Security Studies 5(3): 90–121.

DanielByman, 2003. “Constructing a Democratic Iraq: Challenges and Opportunities,” International Security 28(1): 47–78.

DanielByman, and Evera StephenVan, 1998. “Why They Fight: Hypotheses on the Causes of Contemporary Deadly Conflict,” Security Studies 7(3): 1–50.

PeterCalvert, 1969. Latin America: Internal Conflict and International Peace.New York: St. Martin's Press.

DavidCarment, 1993. “The International Dimension of Ethnic Conflict,” Journal of Peace Research 30(2): 137–150.

E. H.Carr, 1946. The Twenty Years’ Crisis, 1919–1939, 2nd edn. New York: Harper & Row.

SteveChan, 1997. “In Search of Democratic Peace: Problems and Promise,” Mershon International Studies Review 41 (supplement 1): 59–92.

IanClark, 1989. The Hierarchy of States: Reform and Resistance in the International Order.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

YoussefCohen, et al. 1981. “The Paradoxical Nature of State Making: The Violent Creation of Order,” American Political Science Review 75(4): 901–910.

WalkerConnor, 1972. “Nation-Building or Nation-Destroying,” World Politics 24: 319–355.

Dale C.Copeland, 1996. “Economic Interdependence and War: A Theory of Trade Expectations,” International Security 20(4): 5–41.

Svante E.Cornell, 2002. “Autonomy as a Source of Conflict: Caucasian Conflicts in Theoretical Perspective,” World Politics 54: 145–183.

BruceCronin, 2002. “Creating Stability in the New Europe: The OSCE High Commissioner on National Minorities and the Socialization of Risky States,” Security Studies 12(1): 132–163.

ZsuzsaCsergo, and JamesGoldgeier, 2004. “Nationalist Strategies and European Integration,” Perspectives on Politics 2: 21–37.

ClaireCutler, 1991. “The ‘Grotian Tradition’ in International Relations,” Review of International Studies 17: 41–65.

JovanCviji, 1918a. “The Geographical Distribution of the Balkan Peoples,” Geographical Review 5(5): 345–361.

JovanCviji, 1918b. “The Zones of Civilization of the Balkan Peninsula,” Geographical Review 5(6): 470–482.

Steven R.David, 1991b. “Explaining Third World Alignment,” World Politics 43: 233–256.

Steven R.David, 1992/3. “Why the Third World Still Matters,” International Security 17: 127–159.

AddedDawisha, 2002b. “Nation and Nationalism: Historical Antecedents to Contemporary Debates,” International Studies Review 4: 3–22.

BalkanDevlen, , PatrickJames, and OzgurOzdamar, 2005. “The English School, International Relations, and Progress,” International Studies Review 7(2): 171–198.

Paul F.Diehl, and GaryGoertz, 2000. War and Peace in International Rivalry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

William J.Dixon, 1996. “Third-Party Techniques for Preventing Conflict Escalation and Promoting Peaceful Settlement,” International Organization 50(4): 653–682.

JackDonnelly, 2000. Realism and International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Alexander B.Downes, 2001. “The Holy Land Divided: Defending Partition as a Solution to Ethnic Wars,” Security Studies 10(4): 58–116.

Alexander B.Downes, 2004. “The Problem with Negotiated Settlements to Ethnic Civil Wars,” Security Studies 13(4): 230–279.

Michael W.Doyle, 1986. “Liberalism and World Politics,” American Political Science Review 80(4): 1151–1169.

RichardElrod, 1976. “The Concert of Europe: A Fresh Look at an International System,” World Politics 28: 159–174.

MikaelEriksson, and PeterWallensteen, 2004. “Armed Conflict, 1989–2003,” Journal of Peace Research 41(5): 625–636.

CarlosEscude, 1988. “Argentine Territorial Nationalism,” Journal of Latin American Studies 20(1): 139–165.

PeterEvans, 1997. “The Eclipse of the State? Reflections on Stateness in an Era of Globalization,” World Politics 50(1): 68–82.

YairEvron, 1994. “Gulf Crisis and War: Regional Rules of the Game and Policy and Theoretical Explanation,” Security Studies 4(1): 115–154.

James D.Fearon, 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War,” International Organization 49(3): 379–414.

James D.Fearon, 2004. “Separatist Wars, Partition, and World Order,” Security Studies 13(4): 394–415.

James D.Fearon, and David D.Laitin, 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil Wars,” American Political Science Review 97(1): 75–90.