Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Howard, Robert M.
and
Segal, Jeffrey A.
2002.
An Original Look at Originalism.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 1,
p.
113.
Sirovich, Lawrence
2003.
A pattern analysis of the second Rehnquist U.S. Supreme Court.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 100,
Issue. 13,
p.
7432.
Hoekstra, Valerie
and
Johnson, Timothy
2003.
Delaying Justice: The Supreme Court’s Decision to Hear Rearguments.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
351.
Baum, Lawrence
2003.
THESUPREMECOURT INAMERICANPOLITICS.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 1,
p.
161.
Kritzer, Herbert M.
and
Richards, Mark J.
2003.
Jurisprudential Regimes and Supreme Court Decisionmaking: The Lemon Regime and Establishment Clause Cases.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 4,
p.
827.
Arrington, Theodore S.
and
Brenner, Saul
2004.
Strategic Voting for Damage Control On the Supreme Court.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 4,
p.
565.
Annus, Taavi
and
Tavits, Margit
2004.
Judicial Behavior After a Change of Regime: The Effects of Judge and Defendant Characteristics.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 4,
p.
711.
Randazzo, Kirk A.
2004.
Foreign Affairs Litigation in the U.S. Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Analysis.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
227.
McMahon, Kevin J.
2004.
Transformed by Crisis.
p.
119.
Spaeth, Harold J.
2004.
Relisting: An Unexamined Feature of Supreme Court Decision Making.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
143.
Engel, Christoph
2004.
The Impact of Representation Norms on the Quality of Judicial Decisions.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Hurwitz, Mark S.
and
Stefko, Oseph V.
2004.
Acclimation and Attitudes: “Newcomer” Justices and Precedent Conformance on the Supreme Court.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 1,
p.
121.
Howard, Robert M.
and
Segal, Jeffrey A.
2004.
A Preference for Deference? The Supreme Court and Judicial Review.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 1,
p.
131.
Helmke, Gretchen
2004.
Courts under Constraints.
Hettinger, Virginia A.
Lindquist, Stefanie A.
and
Martinek, Wendy L.
2004.
Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 1,
p.
123.
Hurwitz, Mark S.
and
Lanier, Drew Noble
2004.
I Respectfully Dissent: Consensus, Agendas, and Policymaking on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1888–1999.
Review of Policy Research,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 3,
p.
429.
Corley, J. D., Pamela C.
Howard, Robert M.
and
Nixon, David C.
2005.
The Supreme Court and Opinion Content: The Use of the Federalist Papers.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 2,
p.
329.
Hoekstra, Valerie
2005.
Competing Constraints: State Court Responses to Supreme Court Decisions and Legislation on Wages and Hours.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 2,
p.
317.
Bailey, Michael A.
Kamoie, Brian
and
Maltzman, Forrest
2005.
Signals from the Tenth Justice: The Political Role of the Solicitor General in Supreme Court Decision Making.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 49,
Issue. 1,
p.
72.
Wetstein, Matthew E.
and
Ostberg, C. L.
2005.
Strategic Leadership and Political Change on the Canadian Supreme
Court: Analyzing the Transition to Chief Justice.
Canadian Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 3,
p.
653.