Crossref Citations
This Book has been
cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
Howard, Robert M.
and
Segal, Jeffrey A.
2002.
An Original Look at Originalism.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 36,
Issue. 1,
p.
113.
Sirovich, Lawrence
2003.
A pattern analysis of the second Rehnquist U.S. Supreme Court.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,
Vol. 100,
Issue. 13,
p.
7432.
Baum, Lawrence
2003.
THESUPREMECOURT INAMERICANPOLITICS.
Annual Review of Political Science,
Vol. 6,
Issue. 1,
p.
161.
Kritzer, Herbert M.
and
Richards, Mark J.
2003.
Jurisprudential Regimes and Supreme Court Decisionmaking: The Lemon Regime and Establishment Clause Cases.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 37,
Issue. 4,
p.
827.
Hoekstra, Valerie
and
Johnson, Timothy
2003.
Delaying Justice: The Supreme Court’s Decision to Hear Rearguments.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 56,
Issue. 3,
p.
351.
Helmke, Gretchen
2004.
Courts under Constraints.
Arrington, Theodore S.
and
Brenner, Saul
2004.
Strategic Voting for Damage Control On the Supreme Court.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 4,
p.
565.
McMahon, Kevin J.
2004.
Transformed by Crisis.
p.
119.
Randazzo, Kirk A.
2004.
Foreign Affairs Litigation in the U.S. Courts of Appeals: A Preliminary Analysis.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
227.
Hurwitz, Mark S.
and
Lanier, Drew Noble
2004.
I Respectfully Dissent: Consensus, Agendas, and Policymaking on the U.S. Supreme Court, 1888–1999.
Review of Policy Research,
Vol. 21,
Issue. 3,
p.
429.
Spaeth, Harold J.
2004.
Relisting: An Unexamined Feature of Supreme Court Decision Making.
Justice System Journal,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
143.
Annus, Taavi
and
Tavits, Margit
2004.
Judicial Behavior After a Change of Regime: The Effects of Judge and Defendant Characteristics.
Law & Society Review,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 4,
p.
711.
Howard, Robert M.
and
Segal, Jeffrey A.
2004.
A Preference for Deference? The Supreme Court and Judicial Review.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 1,
p.
131.
Engel, Christoph
2004.
The Impact of Representation Norms on the Quality of Judicial Decisions.
SSRN Electronic Journal,
Hettinger, Virginia A.
Lindquist, Stefanie A.
and
Martinek, Wendy L.
2004.
Comparing Attitudinal and Strategic Accounts of Dissenting Behavior on the U.S. Courts of Appeals.
American Journal of Political Science,
Vol. 48,
Issue. 1,
p.
123.
Hurwitz, Mark S.
and
Stefko, Oseph V.
2004.
Acclimation and Attitudes: “Newcomer” Justices and Precedent Conformance on the Supreme Court.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 57,
Issue. 1,
p.
121.
Corley, J. D., Pamela C.
Howard, Robert M.
and
Nixon, David C.
2005.
The Supreme Court and Opinion Content: The Use of the Federalist Papers.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 2,
p.
329.
Hoekstra, Valerie
2005.
Competing Constraints: State Court Responses to Supreme Court Decisions and Legislation on Wages and Hours.
Political Research Quarterly,
Vol. 58,
Issue. 2,
p.
317.
Kritzer, Herbert M.
and
Richards, Mark J.
2005.
The Influence of Law in the Supreme Court’s Search-and-Seizure Jurisprudence.
American Politics Research,
Vol. 33,
Issue. 1,
p.
33.
George, Tracey E.
and
Berger, Jeffrey A.
2005.
Judicial Entrepreneurs on the U.S. Courts of Appeals: A Citation Analysis of Judicial Influence.
SSRN Electronic Journal,