Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home
The Syntax of Negation
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 82
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Déprez, Viviane and Yeaton, Jeremy 2018. Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 14. Vol. 14, Issue. , p. 35.

    COLLINS, CHRIS POSTAL, PAUL M. and YEVUDEY, ELVIS 2018. Negative polarity items in Ewe. Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 54, Issue. 02, p. 331.

    Hengeveld, Kees and Mackenzie, J. Lachlan 2018. Recent Developments in Functional Discourse Grammar. Vol. 205, Issue. , p. 18.

    Delfitto, Denis 2018. Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy. Vol. 18, Issue. , p. 81.

    Broekhuis, Hans 2018. The syntax of Dutch gapping. Linguistics in the Netherlands, Vol. 35, Issue. , p. 19.

    De Clercq, Karen and Vanden Wyngaerd, Guido 2018. Negation and the functional sequence. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory,

    Hosono, Mayumi 2018. Verb Movement in Narrow Syntax. Studia Linguistica,

    Zeijlstra, Hedde 2018. Does Neg-Raising Involve Neg-Raising?. Topoi, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 417.

    Walkden, George 2017. Language contact and V3 in Germanic varieties new and old. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 49.

    Giannakidou, Anastasia and Zeijlstra, Hedde 2017. The Companion to Syntax. p. 1.

    Horvath, Julia 2017. The Companion to Syntax. p. 1.

    Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan and Megerdoomian, Karine 2017. On the Positional Distribution of an Armenian Auxiliary: Second-Position Clisis, Focus, and Phases. Syntax, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 77.

    Childs, Claire 2017. Integrating syntactic theory and variationist analysis: The structure of negative indefinites in regional dialects of British English. Glossa: a journal of general linguistics, Vol. 2, Issue. 1,

    van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen and Temmerman, Tanja 2017. How (Not) to Elide Negation. Syntax, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 41.

    van Hoof, Hanneke 2017. The Companion to Syntax. p. 1.

    De Barros, Courtney and Siebörger, Ian 2016. Sentential negation in South African Sign Language: A case study. Literator, Vol. 37, Issue. 1,

    Thornton, Rosalind Rombough, Kelly Martin, Jasmine and Orton, Linda 2016. Negative sentences in children with specific language impairment. First Language, Vol. 36, Issue. 3, p. 228.

    Carstens, Vicki and Mletshe, Loyiso 2016. Negative concord and nominal licensing in Xhosa and Zulu. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Vol. 34, Issue. 3, p. 761.

    Tubau, Susagna 2016. Lexical variation and Negative Concord in Traditional Dialects of British English. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics, Vol. 19, Issue. 2, p. 143.

    Mahmoud, Reda Ali Hassan 2016. Grammatical and Pragmatic Aspects of Polarity in Arabic Seditious Utterances. Journal of Universal Language, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 21.

    ×

Book description

In this book Liliane Haegeman presents an account of sentential negation within a Government and Binding framework. Building on the work of Klima and Lasnik, Haegeman demonstrates the parallelism between negative sentences and interrogative sentences, and gives a unified analysis in terms of a well-formedness condition on syntactic representations: the AFFECT criterion, instantiated as the WH-criterion in interrogative sentences and as the NEG-criterion in negative sentences. It is shown that in the same way that in many languages the WH-criterion gives rise to WH-movement, the NEG-criterion may also give rise to NEG-movement. This is particularly clear in the Germanic languages. In the analysis of sentential negation in Romance languages the author makes extensive use of the notion of representational chain, showing that in these languages too the NEG-criterion applies at the level of S-structure. In addition to providing a syntactic analysis of sentential negation the book also raises a number of theoretical issues such as that of the distinction between A-positions and A'-positions and the level of application of well-formedness conditions. This book will be of interest to all those working on theoretical syntax, particularly of the Germanic and Romance languages.

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed