Skip to main content
×
Home
The Syntax-Morphology Interface
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 35
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Kramer, Ruth 2016. Morphological Metatheory.


    Round, Erich R. and Corbett, Greville G. 2016. The theory of feature systems: One feature versus two for Kayardild tense-aspect-mood. Morphology,


    Spencer, Andrew 2016. Morphological Metatheory.


    Trommer, Jochen 2016. Morphological Metatheory.


    Bobaljik, Jonathan David 2015. Suppletion: Some Theoretical Implications. Annual Review of Linguistics, Vol. 1, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    Kwon, Nahyun and Round, Erich R. 2015. Phonaesthemes in morphological theory. Morphology, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 1.


    Round, Erich and Stirling, Lesley 2015. Universals of Split Argument Coding and Morphological Neutralization: Why Kala Lagaw Ya Is Not as Bizarre as We Thought. Australian Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 35, Issue. 3, p. 251.


    Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander 2015. Studies in Övdalian Morphology and Syntax.


    2015. Morphosyntactic property sets at the interface of inflectional morphology, syntax and semantics. Lingvisticae Investigationes, Vol. 37, Issue. 2, p. 290.


    Luís, Ana R. 2014. Portuguese-Spanish Interfaces.


    Ackema, Peter and Neeleman, Ad 2013. Person features and syncretism. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 901.


    Caha, Pavel 2013. Explaining the structure of case paradigms by the mechanisms of Nanosyntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory, Vol. 31, Issue. 4, p. 1015.


    Müller, Gereon 2013. A radically non-morphemic approach to bidirectional syncretism. Morphology, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 245.


    Trommer, J. 2013. Preface. Morphology, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 95.


    Wiese, Bernd 2013. On Latin nominal inflection: the form-function relationship. Morphology, Vol. 23, Issue. 2, p. 179.


    Brown, Dunstan Chumakina, Marina Corbett, Greville Popova, Gergana and Spencer, Andrew 2012. Defining ‘periphrasis’: key notions. Morphology, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 233.


    Spencer, Andrew 2012. Identifying Stems. Word Structure, Vol. 5, Issue. 1, p. 88.


    Aalberse, Suzanne and Don, Jan 2011. Person and number syncretisms in Dutch. Morphology, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 327.


    BAERMAN, MATTHEW 2011. Defectiveness and homophony avoidance. Journal of Linguistics, Vol. 47, Issue. 01, p. 1.


    Bobaljik, Jonathan David Nevins, Andrew and Sauerland, Uli 2011. Preface: on the morphosemantics of agreement features. Morphology, Vol. 21, Issue. 2, p. 131.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Syntax-Morphology Interface
    • Online ISBN: 9780511486234
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486234
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Syncretism - where a single form serves two or more morphosyntactic functions - is a persistent problem at the syntax-morphology interface. It results from a 'mismatch' whereby the syntax of a language makes a particular distinction but the morphology does not. This pioneering book provides a full-length study of inflectional syncretism, presenting a typology of its occurrence across a wide range of languages. The implications of syncretism for the syntax-morphology interface have long been recognised: it argues either for an enriched model of feature structure (thereby preserving a direct link between function and form), or for the independence of morphological structure from syntactic structure. This book presents a compelling argument for the autonomy of morphology and the resulting analysis is illustrated in a series of formal case studies within Network Morphology. It will be welcomed by all linguists interested in the relation between words and the larger units of which they are a part.

Reviews

'This book is a milestone in the understanding of syncretism, and will interest both specialists and non-specialists … the existing literature on syncretism is widely documented and discussed at length before the Network Morphology model is proposed, so that the theoretical inquiry matches the quality of the empirical data.

Source: Cercles

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


Abbot, Miriam. 1991. Macushi. In Desmond Derbyshire and Geoffey K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages (vol. III). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 23–160.

Peter Ackema and Ad Neeleman . 2003. Context-sensitive spell-out. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21. 681–735.

Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald and Robert M. W. Dixon . 1998. Dependencies between grammatical systems. Language 74. 56–80.

Peter Austin . 1986. Structural change in language obsolescence: some Eastern Australian examples. Australian Journal of Linguistics 6. 201–30.

Matthew Baerman . 2004. Directionality and (un)natural classes in syncretism. Language 80. 807–827.

Baerman, Matthew.2005. Typology and the formal modelling of syncretism. In Geert Booij and Jaap Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2004. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 41–72.

Edith L. Bavin and Tim Shopen . 1987. Innovations and neutralizations in the Warlpiri pronominal system. Journal of Linguistics 23. 149–75.

Bentley, Delia and Thórhallur Eythórsson. 2001. Alternation according to person in Italo-Romance. In Laurel J. Brinton (ed.), Historical linguistics 1999. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 63–74.

James Blevins . 2003 Stems and paradigms. Language 79. 737–67.

Bobaljik, Jonathan. 2002. Syncretism without paradigms: remarks on Williams 1981, 1994. In Geert Booij and Jaap Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2001. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 53–86.

Boeder, Winfried. 1976. Morphologische Kategorien. In K. Braunmüller and W. Kürschner (eds.), Grammatik. Akten des 10. Linguistischen Kolloquiums, Tübingen 1975 (vol. II). Tübingen: Niemeyer. 117–26.

Booij, Geert. 1996. Inherent versus contextual inflection and the split morphology hypothesis. In Geert Booij and Jaap Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1995. Dordrecht: Foris. 1–16.

Dunstan Brown . 1998a. Defining ‘subgender’: virile and devirilised nouns in Polish. Lingua 104. 187–233.

Dunstan Brown , Greville Corbett , Norman Fraser , Andrew Hippisley and Alan Timberlake . 1996. Russian noun stress and network morphology. Linguistics 34. 53–107.

Joan Bybee . 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Lynne Cahill and Gerald Gazdar . 1997. The inflectional phonology of German adjectives, determiners, and pronouns. Linguistics 35. 211–45.

Lynne Cahill and Gerald Gazdar . 1999. The German noun inflection. Journal of Linguistics 35. first person–42.

Calabrese, Andrea. 1998. Some remarks on the Latin case system and its development in Romance. In José Lema and Esthela Treviño (eds.), Theoretical analyses on Romance languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 71–126.

Andrew Carstairs . 1984. Outlines of a constraint on syncretism. Folia Linguistica 18. 73–85.

Andrew Carstairs-McCarthy . 1994. Inflection classes, gender, and the principle of contrast. Language 70. 737–88.

Carstairs-McCarthy, Andrew.1998a. How lexical semantics constrains inflectional allomorphy. In Geert Booij and Jaap Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1997. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 1–24.

Chapman, Shirley and Desmond C. Derbyshire. 1990. Paumarì. In Desmond C. Derbyshire and Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages (vol. III). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 161–352.

George Tucker Childs . 1995. transitive subject (where forms may differ from those of the intransitive subject) grammar of Kisi: a southern Atlantic language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bernard Comrie . 1975. Polite plurals and predicate agreement. Language 51. 406–18.

Greville G. Corbett 1991. Gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Greville G. Corbett 2000. Number. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Greville G. Corbett and M. Fraser Norman . 1993. Network morphology: a DATR account of Russian nominal inflection. Journal of Linguistics 29. 113–42.

Mary Dalrymple and Ronald M. Kaplan . 2000. Feature indeterminancy and feature resolution. Language 76. 759–98.

Jaime Angulo . 1932. The Chichimeco language (Central Mexico). International Journal of American Linguistics 7. 152–94.

Robert M. W. Dixon 1977. A grammar of Yidiɲ. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gregory T. Stump 2001. Inflectional morphology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Angela Terrill . 2003. A grammar of Lavukaleve. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Alan Timberlake . 1975. Hierarchies in the genitive of negation, Slavic and East European Journal 19. 123–38.

Wiese, Bernd. 1996. Iconicity and syncretism. In Robin Sackmann (ed.), Theoretical linguistics and grammatical description: papers in honour of Hans-Heinrich Lieb on the occasion of his 60th birthday. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 323–44.

Edwin Williams . 1994. Remarks on lexical knowledge. Lingua 92. 7–34.

Dieter Wunderlich . 2001b. How gaps and substitutions can become optimal: the pronominal affix paradigms of Yimas. Transactions of the Philological Society 99. 315–66.

Robert M. W. Dixon 1994. Ergativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

George Driem . 1987. A grammar of Limbu. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Nicholas Evans . 1995. A grammar of Kayardild: with historical-comparative notes on Tangkic. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Evans, Nicholas, Dunstan Brown and Greville G. Corbett. 2001. Dalabon pronominal prefixes and the typology of syncretism: a Network Morphology analysis. In Geert Booij and Jaap Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 2000. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 187–231.

Nicholas Evans , Dunstan Brown , and Greville G. Corbett . 2002. The semantics of gender in Mayali: partially parallel systems and formal implementation. Language 78. 111–55.

Trevor G. Fennell 1975. Is there an instrumental case in Latvian? Journal of Baltic Studies 6. 41–8.

Robert A. Fradkin 1991. Marking, markedness, and person-gender-number patterning in the Arabic tenses and moods. Folia Linguistica 25. 609–64.

Fraser, Norman M. and Greville G. Corbett. 1995. Gender, animacy and declensional class assignment: a unified account for Russian. In Geert Booij and Jaap Marle (eds.), Yearbook of morphology 1994. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 123–50.

Norman M. Fraser and Greville G. Corbett . 1997. Defaults in Arapesh. Lingua 103. 25–57.

Gvozdanović, Jadranka. 1991. Syncretism and the paradigmatic patterning of grammatical meaning. In Frans Plank (ed.), Paradigms: the economy of inflection. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 133–60.

Heidi Harley and Elizabeth Ritter . 2002. Person and number in pronouns: a feature-geometric analysis. Language 78. 482–526.

Mark Harvey . 2002. A grammar of Gaagudju. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Martin Haspelmath . 1993. A grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Haviland, John. 1979. Guugu Yimidhirr. In Robert M. W. Dixon and Barry J. Blake (eds.), Handbook of Australian languages. Canberra: Australian National University Press. 27–180.

Jeffrey Heath . 1998. Pragmatic skewing in 1 ↔ 2 pronominal combinations in Native American languages. International Journal of American Linguistics 64. 83–104.

Helmbrecht, Johannes. 1999. The typology of 1st person marking and its cognitive background. In Masako K. Hiraga , Chris Sinha and Sherman Wilcox (eds.), Cultural, psychological and typological issues in cognitive linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 285–97.

Robert Hetzron . 1967. Agaw numerals and incongruence in Semitic. Journal of Semitic Studies 12. 169–97.

Brian G. Hewitt 1995. Georgian: a structural reference grammar. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

B. J. Hoff 1968. The Carib language. The Hague: M. Nyhoff.

José Ignacio Hualde and Jon Ortiz Urbina (eds.). 2003. A grammar of Basque. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Huntley, David. 1980. The evolution of genitive-accusative animate and personal nouns in Slavic dialects. In Jacek Fisiak (ed.), Historical morphology. The Hague: Mouton. 189–212.

Paul Kiparsky . 2001. Structural case in Finnish. Lingua 111. 315–76.

Renate Lakämper and Wunderlich Dieter . 1998. Person marking in Quechua – a constraint-based minimalist analysis. Lingua 105. 113–48.

Claire Lefebvre and Anne-Marie Brousseau . 2002. A grammar of Fongbe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Luraghi, Silvia. 2000. Synkretismus. In Geert Booij , Christian Lehmann and Joachim Mugdan (eds.), Morphologie: ein Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 638–47.

André Malécot . 1963. Luiseño, a structural analysis II: morphosyntax. International Journal of American Linguistics 29. 196–210.

Elena Maslova . 2003. A grammar of Kolyma Yukaghir. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Yaron Matras . 2002. Romani: a linguistic introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mayerthaler, Willi. 1987. System-independent morphological naturalness. In Wolfgang U. Dressler (ed.), Leitmotifs in natural morphology. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 25–58.

William McGregor . 1990. A functional grammar of Gooniyandi. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Moravcsik, Edith and Jessica Wirth. 1986. Markedness – an overview. In Fred R. Eckman , Edith A. Moravcsik and Jessica R. Wirth (eds.), Markedness: proceedings of the twelfth annual linguistics symposium of the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, March 11–12, 1983. New York: Plenum Press. 1–11.

Muysken, Pieter. 1997. Callahuaya. In: Sally G. Thomasan (ed.), Contact languages. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 427–48.

Carol J. Neidle 1988. The role of case in Russian syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Irina Nikolaeva and Maria Tolskaya . 2001. A grammar of Udihe. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Michael Noonan . 1992. A grammar of Lango. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Popjes, Jack, and Jo Popjes. 1986. Canela-Kraho. In Desmond C. Derbyshire and Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian languages (vol. I). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 128–99.

Ger P. Reesink 1987. Structures and their functions in Usan: a Papuan language of Papua New Guinea. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Keren Rice . 2000. Morpheme order and semantic scope. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carol Rounds . 2001. Hungarian: an essential grammar. London/New York: Routledge.

John Saeed . 1999. Somali. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Nicholas Sims-Williams . 1982. The double system of nominal inflection in Sogdian. Transactions of the Philogical Society 80. 67–76.

Spencer, Andrew.2000. Agreement morphology in Chukotkan. In Wolfgang U. Dressler , Oskar E. Pfeiffer , Markus A. Pöchtrager and John R. Rennison (eds.), Morphological analysis in comparison. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 191–222.

Gregory T. Stump 1993. On rules of referral. Language 69. 449–79.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 297 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 403 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.