Skip to main content
Taming the Imperial Imagination
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Taming the Imperial Imagination
    • Online ISBN: 9781316339176
    • Book DOI:
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Taming the Imperial Imagination marks a novel intervention into the debate on empire and international relations, and offers a new perspective on nineteenth-century Anglo-Afghan relations. Martin J. Bayly shows how, throughout the nineteenth century, the British Empire in India sought to understand and control its peripheries through the use of colonial knowledge. Addressing the fundamental question of what Afghanistan itself meant to the British at the time, he draws on extensive archival research to show how knowledge of Afghanistan was built, refined and warped by an evolving colonial state. This knowledge informed policy choices and cast Afghanistan in a separate legal and normative universe. Beginning with the disorganised exploits of nineteenth-century explorers and ending with the cold strategic logic of the militarised 'scientific frontier', this book tracks the nineteenth-century origins of contemporary policy 'expertise' and the forms of knowledge that inform interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan and elsewhere today.


'Focusing on the shifting parameters of 'knowledge communities', this impressive book situates Afghanistan and the Afghan frontier in a multi-layered and evolving set of British Imperial and colonial policies and practices during the nineteenth century. It is essential reading for all students of modern Afghanistan and for those concerned with colonial knowledge formations and the history of imperialism.’

Shah Mahmoud Hanifi - James Madison University, Virginia

‘According to Edward Said, 'From travelers’ tales … colonies were created'. In recent years scholars have explored the details of the dialectical relationship between colonial knowledge and imperial policy. In Taming the Imperial Imagination, Martin Bayly continues the work begun by Christopher Bayly on British information gathering in India, pushing the investigation north of the Durand Line into Afghanistan. Bayly reconstructs the images of Afghanistan upon which British officials drew in crafting their policy decisions. After discussing the work of the founding figures, he tracks the emergence after 1830 of a more unified concept of the Afghan polity. This book is an important contribution to the histories of British imperialism and Anglo-Afghan relations and to the re-historicization of the international relations discipline.’

George Steinmetz - Charles Tilly Professor of Sociology, University of Michigan

'Bayly, in a single volume, demolishes powerful self-fulfilling myths. Speaking to multiple audiences with interests across the historical and thematic spectrum, this book is a must-read for anyone wanting to understand why Afghanistan looks the way it does in 2017, and more importantly, why many view it the way they do.'

Avinash Paliwal Source: International Affairs

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Alex Burnes , ‘Papers Descriptive of the Countries on the North-West Frontier of India: The Thurr, or Desert: Joodpoor and Jaysulmeer’, Journal of the Royal Geographical Society of London, 4 (1834), 88129.

Lieut Burnes , ‘Substance of a Geographical Memoir on the Indus’, Journal of the Royal Geographical Society of London, 3 (1833), 113–56.

311 Emanuel Adler , ‘Constructivism in International Relations: Sources, Contributions, and Debates’, in Walter Carlsnaes , Thomas Risse , and Beth A. Simmons (eds.), Handbook of International Relations, Second Edition (London: Sage, 2013), 112–44.

John Agnew , ‘The Territorial Trap: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory’, Review of International Political Economy, 1/1 (1994), 5380.

Akbar S. Ahmed , ‘An Aspect of the Colonial Encounter in the North-West Frontier Province’, Asian Affairs, 9/2 (1978), 319–27.

G. J. Alder , ‘The Key to India?: Britain and the Herat Problem 1830–1863 – Part 1’, Middle Eastern Studies, 10/2 (1974), 186209.

Joseph Teboho Ansorge and Tarak Barkawi , ‘Utile Forms: Power and Knowledge in Small Wars’, Review of International Studies, 40/1 (2014), 324.

David Armitage , ‘The Fifty Years’ Rift: Intellectual History and International Relations’, Modern Intellectual History, 1/1 (2004), 97109.

Tony Ballantyne , ‘Rereading the Archive and Opening up the Nation-State: Colonial Knowledge in South Asia and Beyond’, in Antoinette Burton (ed.), After the Imperial Turn: Thinking with and Through the Nation (London: Duke University Press, 2003), 102–21.

Thomas J. Barfield , ‘Problems in Establishing Legitimacy in Afghanistan’, Iranian Studies, 37/2 (2004), 263–93.

Tarak Barkawi and Mark Laffey , ‘The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies’, Review of International Studies, 32/2 (2006), 329–52.

Tarak Barkawi and Mark Laffey , ‘Retrieving the Imperial: Empire and International Relations’, Millennium, 31/1 (2002), 109–27.

Christopher A. Bayly , Indian Society and the Making of the British Empire (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988).

Christopher A. Bayly , ‘Knowing the Country’, Modern Asian Studies, 27/1 (1993), 343.

Martin J. Bayly , ‘Imperial Ontological (In)security: “Buffer States”, International Relations and the Case of Anglo-Afghan Relations, 1808–1878’, European Journal of International Relations, 21/4 (2015), 816–40.

Martin J. Bayly , ‘The “Re-turn” to Empire in IR: Colonial Knowledge Communities and the Construction of the Idea of the Afghan Polity, 1809–38’, Review of International Studies, 40/3 (2014), 443–64.

Seymour Becker , ‘The “Great Game”: The History of an Evocative Phrase’, Asian Affairs, 43/1 (2012), 6180.

Duncan Bell , ‘Dissolving Distance: Technology, Space, and Empire in British Political Thought, 1770–1900’, Journal of Modern History, 77/3 (2005), 523–62.

313 Duncan Bell , ‘Empire and International Relations in Victorian Political Thought’, Historical Journal, 49/1 (2006), 281–98.

Duncan Bell , ‘International Relations: The Dawn of a Historiographical Turn?’, British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 3/1 (2001), 115–26.

Duncan Bell , ‘Writing the World: Disciplinary History and Beyond’, International Affairs, 85/1 (2009), 322.

Thomas J. Bierstecker and Cynthia Weber (eds.), State Sovereignty as Social Construct (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996).

Jordan Branch , ‘“Colonial Reflection” and Territoriality: The Peripheral Origins of Sovereign Statehood’, European Journal of International Relations, 18/2 (2012), 277–97.

Jordan Branch , ‘Mapping the Sovereign State: Technology, Authority, and Systemic Change’, International Organization, 65/1 (2011), 136.

Jerome Bruner , ‘The Narrative Construction of Reality’, Critical Enquiry, 18/1 (1991), 121.

Barry Buzan and George Lawson , The Global Transformation: History Modernity and the Making of International Relations (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).

314 J. T. Checkel , ‘The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory’, World Politics, 50/2 (1998), 324–48.

Thomas E. Colebrooke , Life of the Honourable Mountstuart Elphinstone (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011).

Michael Cox , Ken Booth , and Tim Dunne , ‘Empires, Systems, and States: Great Transformations in International Politics’, Review of International Studies, 27/1 (2001), 115.

Nick Cullather , ‘Damning Afghanistan: Modernization in a Buffer State’, Journal of American History (September 2002).

Nile Green , ‘Tribe, Diaspora, and Statehood in Afghan History’, Journal of Asian Studies, 67/1 (2008), 171211.

Peter Haas , ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, 46/1 (1992), 135.

James Hevia , The Imperial Security State: British Colonial Knowledge and Empire-Building in Asia (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).

Ulrike Hillemann , Asian Empire and British Knowledge (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009).

John Hobson , The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics: Western International Theory, 1760–2010 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012).

Ted Hopf , ‘The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory’, International Security, 23/1 (1998), 171200.

Benjamin Hopkins , ‘The Bounds of Identity: The Goldsmid Mission and the Delineation of the Perso-Afghan Border in the Nineteenth Century’, Journal of Global History, 2 (2007), 233–54.

Benjamin Hopkins , The Making of Modern Afghanistan (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2008).

Michael Howard , ‘The Uses and Abuses of Military History’, RUSI Journal, 138/1 (1993), 2630.

Daniel Jacobi , ‘On the “Construction” of Knowledge and the Knowledge of “Construction”’, International Political Sociology, 5/1 (2011), 94–7.

Thomas H. Johnson and M. Chris Mason , ‘No Sign Until the Burst of Fire: Understanding the Pakistan-Afghanistan Frontier’, International Security, 32/4 (2008), 4177.

Edward Keene , Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002).

Anthony Lake , ‘Confronting Backlash States’, Foreign Affairs, 73/2 (1994), 4555.

319 George Lawson , ‘The Eternal Divide? History and International Relations’, European Journal of International Relations, 18 (2012), 203–26.

George Lawson , ‘The Promise of Historical Sociology in International Relations’, International Studies Review, 8/3 (2006), 397423.

Charles Lindholm , ‘Images of the Pathan: The Usefulness of Colonial Ethnography’, European Journal of Sociology, 21/2 (1980), 350–61.

Timothy Mitchell , ‘The World as Exhibition’, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 31/2 (1989), 217–36.

Jennifer Mitzen , ‘Anchoring Europe’s Civilizing Identity: Habits, Capabilities and Ontological Security’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13/2 (2006), 270–85.

320 Jennifer Mitzen , ‘Ontological Security in World Politics: State Identity and the Security Dilemma’, European Journal of International Relations, 12/3 (2006), 341–70.

Gerald Morgan , ‘Myth and Reality in the Great Game’, Asian Affairs, 4 (1973), 5565.

Senzil Nawid , ‘The State, the Clergy, and British Imperial Policy in Afghanistan During the 19th and Early 20th Centuries’, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 29/4 (1997), 581605.

Bijan Omrani , ‘Charles Masson of Afghanistan: Deserter, Scholar, Spy’, Asian Affairs, 39/2 (2008), 199216.

Jennifer Pitts , ‘Boundaries of Victorian International Law’, in Duncan Bell (ed.), Victorian Visions of Global Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007), 6788.

Jennifer Pitts , A Turn to Empire: The Rise of Imperial Liberalism in Britain and France (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005).

Douglas Porch , Counterinsurgency: Exposing the Myths of the New Way of War (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013).

Gavin Rand and Kim A. Wagner , ‘Recruiting the “Martial Races”: Identities and Military Service in Colonial India’, Patterns of Prejudice, 46/3–4 (2012), 232–54.

Jane Rendell , ‘Scottish Orientalism: From Robertson to James Mill’, Historical Journal, 25/1 (1982), 4369.

Christian Reus-Smit , ‘Reading History through Constructivist Eyes’, Millennium, 37/2 (2008), 395414.

Thomas Risse , ‘“Let’s Argue”: Communicative Action in World Politics’, International Organization, 54/1 (2000), 139.

Priya Satia , Spies in Arabia: The Great War and the Cultural Foundations of Britain’s Covert Empire in the Middle East (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008).

Martin Shaw , ‘Post-Imperial and Quasi-Imperial: State and Empire in the Global Era’, Millennium, 31/2 (2002), 327–36.

322 Gerry Simpson , Great Powers and Outlaw States: Unequal Sovereigns in the International Legal Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004).

Brent J. Steele , ‘Ontological Security and the Power of Self-Identity: British Neutrality and the American Civil War’, Review of International Studies, 31/3 (2005), 519–40.

Philip J. Stern , ‘“A Politie of Civill and Military Power”: Political Thought and the Late Seventeenth-Century Foundations of the East India Company State’, Journal of British Studies, 47/2 (2008), 253–83.

Ann Laura Stoler , ‘On Degrees of Imperial Sovereignty’, Public Culture, 18/1 (2006), 125–46.

David Strang , ‘Contested Sovereignty: The Social Construction of Colonial Imperialism’, in Thomas J. Bierstecker and Cynthia Weber (eds.), State Sovereignty as Social Construct (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996), 2249.

323 Casper Sylvest , ‘The Foundations of Victorian International Law’, in Duncan Bell (ed.), Victorian Visions of Global Order (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).

A. P. Thornton Afghanistan in Anglo-Russian Diplomacy, 1869–1873’, Cambridge Historical Journal, 11/2 (1954), 204–18.

A. P. Thornton The Reopening of the “Central Asian Question”, 1864–9’, History, 41 (1956), 122–36.

Christian Tripodi , ‘“Good for One But Not the Other” the “Sandeman System” of Pacification as Applied to Baluchistan and the North-WestFrontier 1877–1947’, Journal of Military History, 73/3 (2009), 767802.

Gearóid Ó Tuathail and John Agnew , ‘Geopolitics and Discourse: Practical Geopolitical Reasoning in American Foreign Policy’, Political Geography, 11/2 (1992), 190204.

324 Jutta Weldes , ‘Constructing National Interests’, European Journal of International Relations, 2/3 (1996), 275318.

Alexander Wendt , ‘Anarchy is What States Make of it: The Social Construction of Power Politics’, International Organization, 46/2 (1992), 391425.


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 36
Total number of PDF views: 522 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 483 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th August 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.