References
Adams, F. R. (1979). A goal-state theory of function attributions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 9: 492–518.
Alvarado, J. T. and Tugby, M. (2021). A problem for natural-kind essentialism and formal causes. In Jansen, L. and Sandstad, P. (Eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Formal Causation, pp. 201–221. Abingdon: Routledge.
Amundson, R. and Lauder, G. V. (1994). Function without purpose: The uses of causal role function in evolutionary biology. Biology and Philosophy 9: 443–469.
Anjum, R. L. and Mumford, S. (2018). What Tends to Be: The Philosophy of Dispositional Modality. Abingdon: Routledge.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1968). The intentionality of sensation: A grammatical feature. In Butler, R. J. (Ed.), Analytical Philosophy, Second Series, pp. 158–180. Oxford: Blackwell.
Armstrong, D. M. (1978). Universals and Scientific Realism, Vols. I and II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (1997). A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Armstrong, D. M. (2004). Truth and Truthmakers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Audi, P. (2012). A clarification and defense of the notion of grounding. In Correia, F. and Schnieder, B. (Eds.), Metaphysical Grounding: Understanding the Structure of Reality, pp. 101–121. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, C. J. (2017). A biologically informed hylomorphism. In Simpson, W. M. R., Koons, R. C., and Teh, N. J. (Eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science, pp. 185–209. Abingdon: Routledge.
Austin, C. J. and Marmodoro, A. (2017). Structural powers and the homeodynamic unity of organisms. In Simpson, W. M. R., Koons, R. C., and Teh, N. J. (Eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Contemporary Science, pp. 169–184. Abingdon: Routledge.
Azzouni, J. (2004). Deflating Existential Consequence: A Case for Nominalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
Babcock, G. (2023). Teleology and function in non-living nature. Synthese 201, 112: 1–20.
Barandiaran, X. and Moreno, A. (2008). Adaptivity: From metabolism to behavior. Adaptive Behavior 16: 325–344.
Bauer, W. A. (2022). Causal Powers and the Intentionality Continuum. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Beckner, M. (1959). The Biological Way of Thought. New York: Columbia University Press.
Bedau, M. (1992a). Where’s the good in teleology? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 52: 781–806.
Bedau, M. (1992b). Goal-directed systems and the good. Monist 75: 34–51.
Bellazzi, F. (2022). The emergence of the postgenomic gene. European Journal for the Philosophy of Science 12: 1–21.
Bellazzi, F. (forthcoming). Biochemical functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science.
Berman, S. (2020). Platonism and the Objects of Science. London: Bloomsbury.
Bigelow, J. and Pargetter, R. (1987). Functions. Journal of Philosophy 84: 181–196.
Bird, A. (2006). Potency and modality. Synthese 149: 491–508.
Bird, A. (2007). Nature’s Metaphysics: Laws and Properties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bird, A. (2016). Overpowering: How the powers ontology has overreached itself. Mind 125: 341–383.
Bird, A. (2018). Fundamental powers, evolved powers, and mental powers. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 92: 247–275.
Boorse, C. (1976). Wright on functions. Philosophical Review 85: 70–86.
Boorse, C. (1977). Health as a theoretical concept. Philosophy of Science 44: 542–573.
Boorse, C. (2002). A rebuttal on functions. In Ariew, A., Cummins, R., and Perlman, M. (Eds.), Functions: New Essays in the Philosophy of Psychology and Biology, pp. 63–112. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bouchard, F. (2013). How ecosystem evolution strengthens the case for function pluralism. In Huneman, P. (Ed.), Function: Selection and Mechanisms, pp. 83–95. Dordrecht: Springer.
Bourrat, P. (2021). Function, persistence, and selection: Generalizing the selected-effect account of function adequately. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 90: 61–67.
Braithwaite, R. B. (1953). Scientific Explanation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Brandon, R. N. (2013). A general case for function pluralism. In Huneman, P. (Ed.), Function: Selection and Mechanisms, pp. 97–104. Dordrecht: Springer.
Brentano, F. (2015/1874). Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint. Abingdon: Routledge.
Brown, J. R. (1991). The Laboratory of the Mind: Thought Experiments in the Natural Sciences. Abingdon: Routledge.
Brown, J. R. (1994). Smoke and Mirrors: How Science Reflects Reality. Abingdon: Routledge.
Canfield, J. (1964). Teleological explanations in biology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 14: 285–295.
Cartwright, N. (1986). Two kinds of teleological explanation. In Donagan, A., Perovich, A. N. Jr., and Wedin, M. I. (Eds.), Human Nature and Natural Knowledge, pp. 201–210. Vol. 89 of Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Cartwright, N. (1992). Aristotelian natures and the modern scientific method. In Earman, J. (Ed.), Inference, Explanation, and Other Frustrations, pp. 44–71. California: University of California Press.
Cartwright, N. (1999). The Dappled World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cartwright, N. (2019). Nature, the Artful Modeler: Lectures on Laws, Science, How Nature Arranges the World and How We Can Arrange It Better. Chicago, IL: Open Court.
Cartwright, N. and Pemberton, J. (2013). Aristotelian powers: Without them, what would modern science do? In Greco, J. and Groff, R. (Eds.), Powers and Capacities in Philosophy: The New Aristotelianism, pp. 93–112. New York: Routledge.
Christensen, W. D. and Bickhard, M. H. (2002). The process dynamics of normative function. The Monist 85: 3–28.
Corry, R. (2019). Power and Influence: The Metaphysics of Reductive Explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Coyne, L. (2016). Phenomenology and teleology: Hans Jonas’s philosophy of life. Environmental Values 26: 297–315.
Crane, T. (2008). Reply to Nes. Analysis 68: 215–218.
Craver, C. (2013). Functions and mechanisms: A perspectivalist view. In Huneman, P. (Ed.), Function: Selection and Mechanisms, pp. 133–158. Dordrecht: Springer.
Cummins, R. (1975). Functional analysis. Journal of Philosophy 72: 741–765.
Doolittle, W. F. (2013). Is junk DNA bunk? A critique of ENCODE.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 110: 5294–5300.
Ehring, D. (1984a). The system-property theory of goal-directed processes. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 14: 497–504.
Ehring, D. (1984b). Negative feedback and goals. Nature and System 6: 217–220.
Ellis, B. (2001). Scientific Essentialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ellis, B. and Lierse, C. (1994). Dispositional essentialism. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72: 27–44.
Faber, R. J. (1986). Clockwork Garden: On the Mechanistic Reduction of Living Things. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Feser, E. (2009). Aquinas. Oxford: Oneworld.
Feser, E. (2014). Scholastic Metaphysics. Heusenstamm: Editiones Scholasticae.
Feser, E. (2019). Aristotle’s Revenge: The Metaphysical Foundations of Physical and Biological Science. Neunkirchen: Editiones Scholasticae.
Forber, P. (2020). Contemporary teleology. In McDonough, J. K. (Ed.), Teleology: A History, pp. 255–278. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Franklin, A. and Knox, E. (2018). Emergence without limits: The case of phonons. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 64: 68–78.
Friend, T. and Kimpton-Nye, S. (2023). Dispositions and Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gambarotto, A. (2020). Teleology, life and cognition: Reconsidering Jonas’s legacy for a theory of the organism. In Altobrando, A. and Biasetti, P. (Eds.), Natural Born Monads: On the Metaphysics of Organisms and Human Individuals, pp. 243–264. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Garson, J. (2016). A Critical Overview of Biological Functions. Dordrecht: Springer.
Garson, J. (2017). A generalized selected effects theory of function. Philosophy of Science 84: 523–543.
Garson, J. (2018). How to be a function pluralist. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69: 1101–1122.
Garson, J. (2019a). What Biological Functions Are and Why They Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Garson, J. (2019b). There are no ahistorical theories of function. Philosophy of Science 86: 1146–1156.
Garson, J. and Piccinini, G. (2014). Functions must be performed at appropriate rates in appropriate situations. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65: 1–20.
Germain, P.-L., Ratti, E., and Boem, F. (2014). Junk or functional DNA? ENCODE and the function controversy. Biology and Philosophy 29: 807–831.
Giannini, G. (2021). New powers for dispositionalism. Synthese 199: 2671–2700.
Giannini, G. and Mumford, S. (2021). Formal causes for powers theorists. In Jansen, L. and Sandstad, P. (Eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Formal Causation, pp. 87–105. Abingdon: Routledge.
Giannini, G. and Tugby, M. (2020). Potentiality: Actualism minus Naturalism equals Platonism. Philosophical Inquiries 8: 117–140.
Giannotti, J. (2021). The identity theory of powers revised. Erkenntnis 86: 603–621.
Giroux, E. (2015). Epidemiology and the bio-statistical theory of disease: A challenging perspective. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 36: 175–195.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (1993). Functions: Consensus without unity. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 74: 196–208.
Goff, P. (2017). Consciousness and Fundamental Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gould, S. J. and Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation – A missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology 8: 4–15.
Griffiths, P. E. (1993). Functional analysis and proper function. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 44: 409–422.
Griffiths, P. E. and Stotz, K. (2013). Genetics and Philosophy: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Guo, X.-Y. and Tugby, M. (2023). Collective powers. In Austin, C. J., Marmodoro, A., and Roselli, A. (Eds.), Powers, Parts and Wholes: Essays on the Mereology of Powers, pp. 142–166. Abingdon: Routledge.
Hawthorne, J. and Nolan, D. (2006). What would teleological causation be? In Hawthorne, J. (Ed.), Metaphysical Essays, pp. 265–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010/1816). The Science of Logic. G. di Giovanni (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Heil, J. (2021). Appearance in Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hildebrand, T. (2023). Laws of Nature. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hull, D. (1973). Philosophy of Biological Science. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Jenkins, C. S. and Nolan, D. (2012). Disposition impossible. Noûs 46: 732–753.
Jonas, H. (2001). The Phenomenon of Life: Toward a Philosophical Biology. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Kant, I. (2007/1790). Critique of Judgement. J. C. Meredith (trans.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kertész, G. and Kodaj, D. (2023). In defense of teleological intuitions. Philosophical Studies 180: 1421–1437.
Kimpton-Nye, S. (2020). Necessary laws and the problem of counterlegals. Philosophy of Science 87: 518–535.
Kimpton-Nye, S. (2021). Reconsidering the dispositional essentialist canon. Philosophical Studies 178: 3421–3441.
Kimpton-Nye, S. (2022). Pandispositionalism and the metaphysics of powers. Synthese 200, 371: 1–21.
Kistler, M. (2006). Causation and Laws of Nature. Abingdon: Routledge.
Kitcher, P. (1993). Function and design. Midwest Studies in Philosophy 18: 379–397.
Koons, R. C. and Pruss, A. (2017). Must functionalists be Aristotelians? In Jacobs, J. D. (Ed.), Causal Powers, 194–204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Korsgaard, C. M. (2009). Self-Constitution: Agency, Identity, and Integrity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kroll, N. (2017). Teleological dispositions. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 10: 1–37.
Lee, J. G. and McShea, D. W. (2020). Operationalizing goal directedness: An empirical route to advancing a philosophical discussion. Philosophy, Theory and Practice in Biology 12, 5: 1–31.
Lewis, D. (1983). New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61: 343–377.
Lewis, D. (1997). Finkish dispositions. Philosophical Quarterly 47: 143–158.
Lowe, E. J. (1980). Sortal terms and natural laws: An essay on the ontological status of the laws of nature. American Philosophical Quarterly 17: 253–260.
Lowe, E. J. (1982). Laws, dispositions and sortal logic. American Philosophical Quarterly 19: 41–50.
Lowe, E. J. (1987). What is the ‘problem of induction’? Philosophy 62: 325–340.
Lowe, E. J. (2006). The Four-Category Ontology: A Metaphysical Foundation for Natural Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lowe, E. J. (2010). On the individuation of powers. In Marmodoro, A. (Ed.), The Metaphysics of Powers: Their Grounding and Their Manifestations, pp. 8–26. Abingdon: Routledge.
Makin, S. (2006). Aristotle: Metaphysics Book ϴ. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Manier, E. (1971). Functionalism and the negative feedback model in biology. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science 8: 225–240.
Manley, D. and Wasserman, R. (2017). Dispositions without teleology. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 10: 47–60.
Marmodoro, A. (2022). What’s dynamic about causal powers? A black box! In Austin, C. J., Marmodoro, A., and Roselli, A. (Eds.), Powers, Time and Free Will, pp. 1–15. Cham: Springer.
Martin, C. B. (1993). Power for realists. In Bacon, J., Campbell, K., and Reinhardt, L. (Eds.), Ontology, Causality, and Mind: Essays in Honour of D. M. Armstrong, pp. 75–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martin, C. B. (1994). Dispositions and conditionals. The Philosophical Quarterly 44: 1–8.
Martin, C. B. (2008). The Mind in Nature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Martin, C. B. and Pfeifer, K. (1986). Intentionality and the non-psychological. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 46: 531–554.
Maturana, H. and Varela, F. (1980). Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living. Vol. 42 of Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
Mayr, E. (1988). The multiple meanings of teleological. In Mayr, E. (Ed.), Towards a New Philosophy of Biology, pp. 38–66. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
McDonough, J. K. (Ed.), (2020a). Teleology: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McDonough, J. K. (2020b). Not dead yet: Teleology and the ‘scientific revolution’. In McDonough, J. K. (Ed.), Teleology: A History, pp. 150–179. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McKitrick, J. (2003). A case for extrinsic dispositions. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81: 155–174.
McKitrick, J. (2017). Indirect directedness. Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 10: 38–46.
McKitrick, J. (2018). Dispositional Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
McLaughlin, P. (2001). What Functions Explain: Functional Explanation and Self-Reproducing Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McShea, D. W. (2012). Upper-directed systems: A new approach to teleology in biology. Biology and Philosophy 27: 663–684.
Meincke, A. S. (2019). Autopoiesis, biological autonomy and the process view of life. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 9, 5: 1–16.
Melander, P. (1997). Analyzing Functions: An Essay on a Fundamental Notion in Biology. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
Miller, J. F. A. P. (1961). Immunological function of the thymus. Lancet 2: 748–749.
Miller, J. F. A. P. (1971). The immunological role of the thymus. In Samter, M. (Ed.), Immunological Diseases 2nd ed, pp. 84–94. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Millikan, R. G. (1989). In defense of proper functions. Philosophy of Science 56: 288–302.
Millikan, R. G. (1993). White Queen Psychology and Other Essays for Alice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mitchell, S. D. (1993). Dispositions or etiologies? A comment on Bigelow and Pargetter. The Journal of Philosophy 90: 249–259.
Molnar, G. (2003). Powers: A Study in Metaphysics. Mumford, S. (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mossio, M. and Bich, L. (2017). What makes biological organisation teleological? Synthese 194: 1089–1114.
Mossio, M., Saborido, C., and Moreno, A. (2009). An organizational account of biological functions. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60: 813–841.
Mumford, S. (1998). Dispositions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mumford, S. (1999). Intentionality and the physical: A new theory of disposition ascription. The Philosophical Quarterly 49: 215–225.
Mumford, S. (2004). Laws in Nature. London: Routledge
Mumford, S. (2006). The ungrounded argument. Synthese 149: 471–489.
Mumford, S. (2021). Where the real power lies: A reply to Bird. Mind 130: 1295–1308.
Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Nagel, E. (1979). Teleology Revisited and Other Essays in the Philosophy and History of Science. New York: Columbia University Press.
Neander, K. (1983). Abnormal psychobiology. PhD dissertation, La Trobe University.
Neander, K. (1991). Functions as selected effects: The conceptual analyst’s defense. Philosophy of Science 58: 168–184.
Neander, K. (2002). Why history matters: Four theories of functions. In Weingarten, W. and Schlosser, G. (Eds.), Formen der Erklärung in der Biologie, pp. 91–120. Berlin: VWB-Verlag für Wissenschaft Und Bildung.
Neander, K. (2017). Functional analysis and the species design. Synthese 194: 1147–1168.
Nes, A. (2008). Are only mental phenomena intentional? Analysis 68: 205–215.
Nissen, L. (1981). Nagel’s self-regulation analysis of teleology. The Philosophical Forum 12: 128–138.
Nissen, L. (1997). Teleological Language in the Life Sciences. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Oderberg, D. S. (2007). Real Essentialism. Abingdon: Routledge.
Oderberg, D. S. (2008). Teleology: Inorganic and organic. In González, A. M. (Ed.), Contemporary Perspectives on Natural Law, pp. 259–279. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Oderberg, D. S. (2010). The metaphysical foundations of natural law. In Zaborowski, H. (Ed.), Natural Moral Law in Contemporary Society, pp. 44–75. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.
Oderberg, D. S. (2017). Finality revived: Powers and intentionality. Synthese 194: 2387–2425.
Oderberg, D. S. (2020). The Metaphysics of Good and Evil. London: Routledge.
Oliver, S. (2013). Aquinas and Aristotle’s teleology. Nova et Vetera 11: 849–870.
Page, B. (2015). The dispositionalist deity: How God creates laws and why theists should care. Zygon 50: 113–137.
Page, B. (2021). Power-ing up neo-Aristotelian natural goodness. Philosophical Studies 178: 3755–3775.
Paolini Paoletti, M. (2021a). Functional powers. In Jansen, L. and Sandstad, P. (Eds.), Neo-Aristotelian Perspectives on Formal Causation, pp. 124–148. Abingdon: Routledge.
Paolini Paoletti, M. (2021b). Teleological powers. Analytic Philosophy 62: 336–358.
Pittendrigh, C. S. (1958). Adaptation, natural selection and behavior. In Roe, A. and Simpson, G. G. (Eds.), Behavior and Evolution, pp. 390–416. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Place, U. T. (1996). Intentionality as the mark of the dispositional. Dialectica 50: 91–120.
Plantinga, A. (1993). Warrant and Proper Function. New York: Oxford University Press.
Preston, B. (1998). Why is a wing like a spoon? A pluralist theory of function. Journal of Philosophy 95: 215–254.
Prior, E. (1985). What is wrong with etiological accounts of biological function? Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 66: 310–328.
Raimondi, A. (2021). Crane and the mark of the mental. Analysis 81: 683–693.
Ransome Johnson, M. (2005). Aristotle on Teleology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rose, D. and Schaffer, J. (2017). Folk mereology is teleological. Noûs 51: 238–270.
Rose, D., Schaffer, J., and Tobia, K. (2020). Folk teleology drives persistence judgments. Synthese 197: 5491–5509.
Rosenblueth, A. and Wiener, N. (1950). Purposeful and non-purposeful behavior. Philosophy of Science 17: 318–326.
Rosenblueth, A., Wiener, N., and Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose and teleology. Philosophy of Science 10: 18–24.
Ruse, M. (1971). Functional statements in biology. Philosophy of Science 38: 87–95.
Russell, E. S. (1945). The Directiveness of Organic Activities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sachs, C. (2023). Naturalized teleology: Cybernetics, organization, purpose. Topoi 42: 781–779.
Sangiacomo, A. (2015). Teleology and agreement in nature. In Campos, A. S. (Ed.), Spinoza: Basic Concepts, pp. 87–102. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
Schaffner, K. F. (1993). Discovery and Explanation in Biology and Medicine. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Scheffler, I. (1959). Thoughts on teleology. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9: 265–284.
Scheffler, I. (1963). The Anatomy of Inquiry. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Schelling, F. J. (2000/1800) System des Transzendentalen Idealismus. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Schmid, S. (2011). Teleology and the dispositional theory of causation in Thomas Aquinas. Logical Analysis and History of Philosophy 14: 21–39.
Schrenk, M. (2016). Metaphysics of Science: A Systematic and Historical Introduction. London: Routledge.
Schwartz, J. (1993). Functional explanation and metaphysical individualism. Philosophy of Science 60: 278–301.
Smart, B. (2016). Concepts and Causes in the Philosophy of Disease. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sommerhoff, G. (1950). Analytical Biology. London: Oxford University Press.
Sorabji, R. (1964). Function. The Philosophical Quarterly 14: 289–302.
Spinoza, B. (2018/1677). Ethics. Kisner, M. J. (Ed.) and M. Silverthorne (trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stovall, P. (2024). The teleological modal profile and subjunctive background of organic generation and growth. Synthese 203, 77: 1–37.
Tahko, T. E. (2020). Where do you get your protein? Or: Biochemical realization. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 71: 799–825.
Tan, P. (2017). Interventions and counternomic reasoning. Philosophy of Science 84: 956–969.
Tan, P. (2019). Counterpossible non-vacuity in scientific practice. The Journal of Philosophy 116: 32–60.
Taylor, R. (1950a). Comments on a mechanistic conception of purposefulness. Philosophy of Science 17: 310–317.
Taylor, R. (1950b). Purposeful and non-purposeful behavior: A rejoinder. Philosophy of Science 17: 327–332.
Trestman, M. A. (2012). Implicit and explicit goal-directedness. Erkenntnis 77: 207–236.
Tugby, M. (2013). Platonic dispositionalism. Mind 122: 451–480.
Tugby, M. (2015). The alien paradox. Analysis 75: 28–37.
Tugby, M. (2016). On the reality of intrinsically finkable dispositions. Philosophia 44: 623–631.
Tugby, M. (2020). Organic powers. In Meincke, A. S. (Ed.), Dispositionalism: Perspectives from Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science, pp. 213–238. Cham: Springer.
Tugby, M. (2021). Grounding theories of powers. Synthese 198: 11187–11216.
Tugby, M. (2022a). Putting Properties First: A Platonic Metaphysics for Natural Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tugby, M. (2022b). The laws of modality. Philosophical Studies 179: 2597–2618.
Vetter, B. (2015). Potentiality: From Dispositions to Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Vetter, B. (2018). Evolved powers, artefact powers, and dispositional explanations. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 92: 277–297.
Vetter, B. (2021). Explanatory dispositionalism: What anti-Humeans should say. Synthese 199: 2051–2075.
Walsh, D. (2008). Teleology. In Ruse, M. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Biology, pp. 113–137. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walsh, D. M. and Ariew, A. (1996). A taxonomy of functions. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 26: 493–514.
Williams, N. E. (2019). The Powers Metaphysic. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wimsatt, W. C. (1972). Teleology and the logical structure of function statements. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 3: 1–80.
Witt, C. (2003). Ways of Being: Potentiality and Actuality in Aristotle’s Metaphysics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Witt, C. (2008). Aristotelian powers. In Groff, R. (Ed.), Revitalizing Causality: Realism about Causality in Philosophy and Social Science, pp. 129–138. Abingdon: Routledge.
Woodfield, A. (1976). Teleology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wright, L. (1973). Functions. Philosophical Review 82: 139–168.
