Skip to main content
×
×
Home
The Cambridge Companion to Shakespearean Tragedy
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Cambridge Companion to Shakespearean Tragedy
    • Online ISBN: 9781139095747
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCO9781139095747
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

This revised and updated Companion acquaints the student reader with the forms, contexts, critical and theatrical lives of the ten plays considered to be Shakespeare's tragedies. Thirteen essays, written by leading scholars in Britain and North America, address the ways in which Shakespearean tragedy originated, developed and diversified, as well as how it has fared on stage, as text and in criticism. Topics covered include the literary precursors of Shakespeare's tragedies, cultural backgrounds, sub-genres and receptions of the plays. The book examines the four major tragedies and, in addition, Titus Andronicus, Romeo and Juliet, Julius Caesar, Antony and Cleopatra, Coriolanus and Timon of Athens. Essays from the first edition have been fully revised to reflect the most up-to-date scholarship; the bibliography has been extensively updated; and four new chapters have been added, discussing Shakespearean form, Shakespeare and philosophy, Shakespeare's tragedies in performance, and Shakespeare and religion.

Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Select bibliography

Adelman, Janet,Suffocating Mothers: Fantasies of Maternal Origin in Shakespeare’s Plays, ‘Hamlet’ to ‘The Tempest’(New York and London: Routledge, 1992).
Adelman, Janet, The Common Liar: An Essay on ‘Antony and Cleopatra’ (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1973).
Aebischer, Pascale, Shakespeare’s Violated Bodies: Stage and Screen Performances (Cambridge University Press, 2004).
Allen, Michael J. B. and Kenneth Muir, eds., Shakespeare’s Plays in Quarto: A Facsimile Edition of Copies Primarily from the Henry E. Huntington Library (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1981).
Altman, J. B., The Improbability of Othello: Rhetorical Anthropology and Shakespearean Selfhood (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2010).
Anderson, Linda Marie, A Kind of Wild Justice: Revenge in Shakespeare’s Comedies (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1987).
Andrews, Michael Cameron, ‘Hamlet:Revenge and the Critical Mirror’, English Literary Renaissance 8 (1978): 9–23.
Auden, W. H., The Dyer’s Hand (London: Vintage, 1988).
Axton, Marie, The Queen’s Two Bodies: Drama and the Elizabethan Succession (London: Royal Historical Society, 1977).
Ayres, Philip J., ‘Degrees of Heresy: Justified Revenge and Elizabethan Narratives’, Studies in Philology 69 (1972): 461–74.
Baldwin, T. W., William Shakespere’s Small Latine and Lesse Greeke, 2 vols. (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1944).
Bartels, Emily, Speaking of the Moor: From Alcazar to Othello (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2008).
Barton, Anne, Shakespeare and the Idea of the Play (New York: Greenwood, 1977).
Bate, Jonathan, ed., The Romantics on Shakespeare (London and New York: Penguin Books, 1992).
Bayley, John, The Characters of Love (London: Constable, 1960).
Belsey, Catherine, Shakespeare and the Loss of Eden: The Construction of Family Values in Early Modern Culture (London: Macmillan, 1999; New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2000).
Belsey, Catherine, The Subject of Tragedy: Identity and Difference in Renaissance Drama (London and New York: Routledge, 1985).
Belsey, Catherine, ‘Tragedy, Justice and the Subject’, 1642: Literature and Power in the Seventeenth Century, ed. Francis Barker (Colchester: University of Essex, 1981), pp. 166–86.
Bennett, Susan, Performing Nostalgia: Shifting Shakespeare and the Contemporary Past (London and New York: Routledge, 1996).
Bentley, Gerald Eades, The Profession of Dramatist in Shakespeare’s Time (Princeton University Press, 1971).
Berger, Harry, Jr, ‘Text against Performance: the Gloucester Family Romance’, Shakespeare’s Rough Magic: Essays in Honor of C. L. Barber, ed. Peter Erickson and Coppélia Kahn (Newark, NJ: University of Delaware Press, 1985).
Bevington, David, Murder Most Foul: Hamlet through the Ages(Oxford University Press, 2011).
Bevington, David, ‘Mutius: an Obstacle Removed in Titus Andronicus’,George Peele, ed. David Bevington, (London: Ashgate, 2011), pp. 449–62.
Bevington, David, Tudor Drama and Politics (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1968).
Blayney, Peter W. M., The First Folio of Shakespeare (Washington, DC: The Folger Shakespeare Library, 1991).
Booth, Stephen, ‘King Lear’, ‘Macbeth’, Indefinition, and Tragedy (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1983).
Bowers, Fredson, Elizabethan Revenge Tragedy, 1587–1642 (Princeton University Press, 1940).
Bradbrook, Muriel, Themes and Conventions in Elizabethan Tragedy (Cambridge University Press, 1960).
Braden, Gordon, Renaissance Tragedy and the Senecan Tradition: Anger’s Privilege (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1985).
Bradley, A. C., Oxford Lectures on Poetry (London: Macmillan, 1909, rpt 1962).
Bradley, A. C., Shakespearean Tragedy: Lectures on ‘Hamlet’, ‘Othello’, ‘King Lear’, and ‘Macbeth’ (London: Macmillan, 1904; 2nd edn, 1905).
Brodwin, Leonora, Elizabethan Love Tragedy, 1587–1625 (London and New York University Presses, 1971).
Broude, Ronald, ‘Revenge and Revenge Tragedy in Renaissance England’, Renaissance Quarterly 28 (1975): 38–58.
Brower, Reuben, Hero and Saint: Shakespeare and the Graeco-Roman Heroic Tradition (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971).
Burckhardt, Sigurd, ‘How Not to Murder Caesar’, Shakespearean Meanings (Princeton University Press, 1968), p. 9.
Bushnell, Rebecca W., Tragedies of Tyrants: Political Thought and Theater in the English Renaissance (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985)
Callaghan, Dympna, Women and Gender in Renaissance Tragedy (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1989).
Campbell, Lily B., Shakespeare’s Tragic Heroes: Slaves of Passion (Cambridge University Press, 1930).
Campbell, Lily B., ‘Theories of Revenge in Renaissance England’, Modern Philology 28 (1931): 281–96.
Cavell, Stanley, Disowning Knowledge in Six Plays of Shakespeare (Cambridge University Press, 1987).
Chambers, E. K., William Shakespeare: A Study of Facts and Problems, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1930).
Charnes, Linda, Notorious Identity: Materializing the Subject in Shakespeare’s Plays (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1993).
Clemen, Wolfgang, Shakespeare’s Dramatic Art (London: Methuen, 1972).
Coghill, Nevill, Shakespeare’s Professional Skills (Cambridge University Press, 1964).
Cole, Susan, The Absent One: Mourning Ritual, Tragedy, and the Performance of Ambivalence (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1985).
Collinson, Patrick, The Religion of Protestants: The Church in English Society, 1559–1625 (Oxford University Press, 1982).
Cooper, Helen, The English Romance in Time: Transforming Motifs from Geoffrey of Monmouth to the Death of Shakespeare (Oxford University Press, 2004).
Cox, John D., Shakespeare and the Dramaturgy of Power (Princeton University Press, 1989).
Crockett, Bryan, The Play of Paradox: Stage and Sermon in Renaissance England (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1996).
Cunliffe, John William, The Influence of Seneca on Elizabethan Tragedy: An Essay (London: Macmillan, 1893).
Dabhoiwala, Faramerz, The Origins of Sex: A History of the First Sexual Revolution (London: Allen Lane, 2011).
Davies, Horton, Worship and Theology in England from Cranmer to Hooker 1534–1603, 5 vols. (Princeton University Press, 1970).
Davis, Lloyd, ‘Embodied Masculinity in Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar’, Entertext 2, 1 (2003): 161–82.
De Grazia, Margreta, ‘Hamlet’ without Hamlet (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
De Grazia, Margreta, Shakespeare Verbatim: The Reproduction of Authenticity and the 1790 Apparatus (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).
Dickey, Franklin M., Not Wisely But Too Well: Shakespeare’s Love Tragedies (San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1957).
Diehl, Huston, Staging Reform, Reforming the Stage: Protestantism and Popular Theater in Early Modern Drama (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1997).
Dillon, Janette, ‘Is There a Performance in this Text?’, Shakespeare Quarterly 45 (1994): 74–86.
Dobson, Michael, The Making of the National Poet: Shakespeare, Adaptation and Authorship, 1660–1769 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).
Dobson, Michael, Performing Shakespeare’s Tragedies Today: The Actor’s Perspective (Cambridge University Press, 2006).
Dollimore, Jonathan, Radical Tragedy: Religion, Ideology and Power in the Drama of Shakespeare and his Contemporaries (Brighton: Harvester Press, 1984).
Doran, Madeleine, ‘History and Tragedy’, Endeavors of Art: A Study of Form in Elizabethan Drama (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1954).
Drakakis, John, ed., Shakespearean Tragedy (London: Longman, 1992).
Duffy, Eamon, The Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England c. 1400–1580 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1992).
Dutton, Richard, Alison Findlay and Richard L. Wilson, eds., Lancastrian Shakespeare: Region, Religion and Patronage (Manchester University Press, 2004).
Elias, Norbert, The Civilizing Process, trans. Edmund Jephcott, 2 vols. (Oxford: Blackwell, 1982).
Ellis-Fermor, Una, ‘The Equilibrium of Tragedy’, The Frontiers of Drama (London: Methuen, 1948).
Elton, William R., King Lear and the Gods (San Marino, CA: Huntington Library, 1966).
Erne, Lukas, ed., The First Quarto of ‘Romeo and Juliet’ (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Esler, Anthony, The Aspiring Mind of the Elizabethan Younger Generation (Durham, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1966).
Falco, Raphael, Charismatic Authority in Early Modern English Tragedy(Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2000).
Fernie, Ewan, Shame in Shakespeare (London and New York: Routledge, 2002).
Fineman, Joel, Shakespeare’s Perjured Eye: The Invention of Poetic Subjectivity in the Sonnets (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986).
Fitz, Linda T., ‘Egyptian Queens and Male Reviewers: Sexist Attitudes in Antony and Cleopatra Criticism’, Shakespeare Quarterly 28 (1977): 217–316.
Foakes, R. A., ‘Hamlet’ Versus ‘Lear’: Cultural Politics and Shakespeare’s Art (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
Fowler, Alistair, Kinds of Literature: An Introduction to the Theory of Genres and Modes (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).
Frye, Northrop, Anatomy of Criticism (London: Penguin, 1957).
Frye, Northrop, Fools of Time: Studies in Shakespearean Tragedy (University of Toronto Press, 1991).
Frye, Roland Mushat, Shakespeare: The Art of the Dramatist (London: Allen and Unwin, 1982).
Gardiner, Helen, Shakespeare and Religion (London: Faber, 1971).
Garner, Shirley Nelson and Madelon Sprengnether, eds., Shakespearean Tragedy and Gender (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1996).
Giddens, Eugene, ‘“Honorable Men”: Militancy and Masculinity in Julius Caesar’, Renaissance Forum 5, 2 (2001): 1–16.
Gillies, John, Shakespeare and the Geography of Difference (Cambridge University Press, 1994).
Girard, René, Violence and the Sacred, trans. Patrick Gregory (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1977).
Goldberg, Jonathan, James I and the Politics of Literature: Jonson, Shakespeare, Donne and Their Contemporaries (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1983).
Grady, Hugh, The Modernist Shakespeare (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1991).
Graham, Kenneth J. E., The Performance of Conviction: Plainness and Rhetoric in the Early English Renaissance (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1994).
Green, Douglas E., ‘Interpreting “Her Martyr’d Signs”: Gender and Tragedy in Titus Andronicus, Shakespeare Quarterly 40 (1989): 317–26.
Greenblatt, Stephen, Hamlet in Purgatory (Princeton University Press, 2002).
Greenblatt, Stephen, Renaissance Self-Fashioning from More to Shakespeare (University of Chicago Press, 1980).
Greenblatt, Stephen, ‘Shakespeare and the Ethics of Authority’, Shakespeare and Early Modern Political Thought, ed. David Armitage, Conal Condren and Andrew Fitzmaurice (Cambridge University Press, 2009), pp. 64–79.
Greenblatt, Stephen, Shakespearean Negotiations: The Circulation of Social Energy in Renaissance England (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988).
Greg, W. W., The Editorial Problem in Shakespeare, 3rd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954).
Greg, W. W., The Shakespeare First Folio: Its Bibliographical and Textual History (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1955).
Griswold, Wendy, Renaissance Revivals: City Comedy and Revenge Tragedy in the London Theatre, 1576–1980 (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1986).
Gurr, Andrew, The Shakespearean Stage, 3rd edn (Cambridge University Press, 1992).
Hall, Kim F., Things of Darkness: Economies of Race and Gender in Early Modern England (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1995).
Hallett, Charles and Elaine S. Hallett, The Revenger’s Madness: A Study of Revenge Tragedy Motifs (Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 1980).
Halliwell, Stephen.Aristotle’s Poetics (London: Duckworth, 1986).
Hammond, Paul, The Strangeness of Tragedy (Oxford University Press, 2009).
Hanna, Sara, Shakespeare’s Greek World: the Temptations of the Sea’, Playing the Globe: Genre and Geography in Renaissance Drama, ed. John Gillies and Virginia Mason Vaughan (Madison: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press, 1998), pp. 107–28.
Harbage, Alfred, Twentieth-Century Views of Shakespeare’s Tragedies (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1964).
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich, Aesthetics: Lectures on Fine Art, ed. and trans. T. M. Knox, 2 vols. (Oxford University Press, 1975).
Hegel, Gerog Wilhelm Friedrich, Hegel on Tragedy, ed. Anne and Henry Paolucci (New York: Harper and Row, 1975).
Heller, Agnes, The Time is out of Joint: Shakespeare as Philosopher of History (Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield, 2002).
Henn, T. R., The Harvest of Tragedy (London: Methuen, 1956).
Herman, Peter, ‘Tragedy and the Crisis of Authority in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet,Intertext 1–2 (2008): 89–109.
Hibbard, G. R., King Lear: a Retrospect’, Shakespeare Survey 33 (1980): 1–12.
Hillman, David, ‘Visceral Knowledge: Shakespeare, Skepticism, and the Interior of the Early Modern Body’, The Body in Parts: Fantasies of Corporeality in Early Modern England, ed. David Hillman and Carla Mazzio (New York and London: Routledge, 1997), pp. 81–105.
Hinman, Charlton, The Printing and Proof-Reading of the First Folio of Shakespeare, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1963).
Hinman, Charlton, ed., The Norton Facsimile: The First Folio of Shakespeare, 2nd edn, intro. by Peter W. M. Blayney (New York: W. W. Norton, 1996).
Hodgdon, Barbara, ‘Doing the Egyptian’, The Shakespeare Trade: Performances and Appropriations (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1998), pp. 81–94.
Homan, Sidney, Shakespeare’s Theater of Presence (Lewisburg: University of Kentucky Press, 1986).
Honigmann, E. A. J., The Stability of Shakespeare’s Text (London: Edward Arnold, 1965).
Hopkins, Lisa, The Cultural Uses of the Caesars on the Renaissance Stage (Aldershot and Burlington, VT: Ashgate, 2008).
Howard, Jean E., Shakespeare’s Art of Orchestration (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1984).
Hunter, G. K., Dramatic Identities and Cultural Tradition: Studies in Shakespeare and his Contemporaries (Liverpool University Press, 1978).
Hunter, G. K., The Heroism of Hamlet’, Hamlet, ed. J. R. Brown and Bernard Harris (Stratford-upon-Avon Studies, 5; London: Arnold, 1963).
Hunter, Robert Grams, Shakespeare and the Comedy of Forgiveness (New York: Columbia University Press, 1965).
Hutson, Lorna, The Invention of Suspicion: Law And Mimesis in Shakespeare and Renaissance Drama (Oxford University Press, 2007).
Ioppolo, Grace, Revising Shakespeare (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991).
Jackson, Ken, ‘ “One Wish” or the Possibility of the Impossible: Derrida, the Gift and God in Timon of Athens’, Shakespeare Quarterly 52, 1 (2001): 34–66.
Jacoby, Susan, Wild Justice: The Evolution of Revenge (New York: Harper & Row, 1983).
Jones, Emrys, The Origins of Shakespeare (Oxford University Press, 1977).
Jones, Emrys, Hamlet and Oedipus, rev. edn (New York: Doubleday, 1949, 1954).
Jones, Emrys, Scenic Form in Shakespeare (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971).
Jones, John, On Aristotle and Greek Tragedy (Stanford University Press, 1962).
Jowett, John, ‘After Oxford: Recent Developments in Textual Studies’, The Shakespearean International Yearbook, ed. W. R. Elton and John M. Mucciolo (Aldershot: Ashgate, 1999), pp. 65–86.
Kahn, Coppélia, ‘“Magic of Bounty”: Timon of Athens, Jacobean Patronage, and Maternal Power’, Shakespeare Quarterly 38, 1 (1987): 34–57.
Kastan, David Scott, ‘“His Semblable Is His Mirror”: Hamlet and the Imitation of Revenge’, Shakespeare Studies 19 (1987): 111–24.
Kastan, David Scott, ‘“Proud Majesty Made a Subject”: Representing Authority on the Early Modern Stage’, Shakespeare After Theory (London: Routledge, 1999).
Kastan, David Scott, Shakespeare and the Shapes of Time (Hanover, NH: University Press of New England, 1982).
Kaufman, Peter, Prayer, Despair and Drama (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1996).
Kennedy, Dennis, Looking at Shakespeare: A Visual History of Twentieth-Century Performance, 2nd edn (Cambridge University Press, 2001).
Kerrigan, John, Revenge Tragedy: Aeschylus to Armageddon (New York: Oxford University Press, 1996).
Keyishian, Harry, The Shapes of Revenge: Victimization, Vengeance, and Vindictiveness in Shakespeare (Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press, 1995).
King, John N., Tudor Royal Iconography (Princeton University Press, 1989).
Kirsch, Arthur C., The Passions of Shakespeare’s Tragic Heroes (Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1990).
Knapp, Jeff, Shakespeare’s Tribe: Church, Nation and Theater in Shakespeare’s England (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2002).
Kottman, Paul A., Defying the Stars: Tragic Love and the Struggle for Freedom in Romeo and Juliet’, Shakespeare Quarterly 63 (2012): 1–38.
Kottman, Paul A., Tragic Conditions in Shakespeare: Disinheriting the Globe (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2009).
Kottman, Paul A., ed., Philosophers on Shakespeare (Stanford University Press, 2009).
Kyd, Thomas, The Spanish Tragedy, ed. Philip Edwards (London: Methuen, 1959).
Lamb, Margaret, Antony and Cleopatra on the English Stage (London: Associated University Presses, 1980).
Leech, Clifford, Tragedy (London: Methuen, 1969).
Leggatt, Alexander, Shakespeare’s Political Drama: The History Plays and the Roman Plays (London: Routledge, 1988).
Leggatt, Alexander, Shakespeare’s Tragedies: Violation and Identity (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Lever, J. W., The Tragedy of State (London: Methuen, 1971).
Levin, Harry, The Overreacher (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1952).
Limon, Jerzy, ‘Revenge Tragedy, or, a Decayed Form – a Review Essay’, Southern Humanities Review 16 (1982): 257–67.
Loomba, Ania, ‘Shakespeare and Cultural Difference’, Alternative Shakespeares 2, ed. Terence Hawkes (London: Routledge, 1996).
Lucas, F. L., Tragedy in Relation to Aristotle’s Poetics (London: Hogarth Press, 1927).
Lyne, Raphael, Shakespeare, Rhetoric and Cognition (Cambridge University Press 2011).
Mack, Maynard, ‘The World of Hamlet’, Yale Review, new series, 41 (1951–2): 515.
Maguire, Laurie E., Shakespearean Suspect Texts (Cambridge University Press, 1996).
Mahood, M. M., Shakespeare’s Wordplay (London: Methuen, 1957).
Marsden, Jean I., The Re-imagined Text: Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Eighteenth-Century Literary Theory (Lexington: University Press of Kentucky, 1995).
Marshall, Cynthia, ‘Man of Steel Done Got the Blues: Melancholic Subversion of Presence in Antony and Cleopatra’, Shakespeare Quarterly 44 (1993): 385–408.
Marshall, Gail, ed., Nineteenth-Century Shakespeare (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Mason, H. A., Shakespeare’s Tragedies of Love (London: Chatto and Windus, 1970).
Maus, Katharine Eisaman, Inwardness and Theater in the English Renaissance (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1995).
McAlindon, T., ‘Cultural Materialism and the Ethics of Reading: or, the Radicalizing of Jacobean Tragedy’, The Modern Language Review 90 (1995): 830–46.
McAlindon, T., Shakespeare’s Tragic Cosmos (Cambridge University Press, 1991).
McAlindon, T., Tragedy, King Lear, and the Politics of the Heart’, Shakespeare Survey 44 (1992): 85–90.
McDonald, Russ, Shakespeare and the Arts of Language (Oxford University Press, 2001).
McEachern, Claire, The Poetics of English Nationhood, 1590–1612 (Cambridge University Press, 1996).
McEachern, Claire and Debora Shuger, eds., Religion and Culture in Renaissance England (Cambridge University Press, 1997).
McElroy, Bernard, Shakespeare’s Mature Tragedies (Princeton University Press, 1973).
Mehl, Dieter, Shakespeare’s Tragedies: An Introduction (Cambridge University Press, 1986).
Mercer, Peter, Hamlet and the Acting of Revenge (University of Iowa Press, 1987).
Miles, Gary B., ‘How Roman are Shakespeare’s “Romans”?’, Shakespeare Quarterly 41, 3 (1989): 257–83.
Miola, Robert S., Shakespeare and Classical Comedy: The Influence of Plautus and Terence (Oxford University Press, 1994).
Miola, Robert S., Shakespeare and Classical Tragedy: The Influence of Seneca (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1992).
Miola, Robert S., Shakespeare’s Rome (Cambridge University Press, 1983).
Montrose, Louis, The Purpose of Playing: Shakespeare and the Cultural Politics of the Elizabethan Theatre (University of Chicago Press, 1996).
Mortimer, Nigel, John Lydgate’s Fall of Princes: Narrative Tragedy in its Literary and Political Contexts (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Moschovakis, Nicholas R., ‘Irreligious Piety and Christian History: Persecution and Pagan Anachronism in Titus Adronicus’, Shakespeare Quarterly 53, 4 (2002): 460–86.
Muir, Kenneth, Shakespeare’s Tragic Sequence (London: Methuen, 1972).
Munro, Lucy, ‘Tragic Forms’, The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Tragedy, ed. Emma Smith, and Garrett A. Sullivan, Jr (Cambridge University Press, 2010), pp. 86–101.
Nevo, Ruth, Tragic Form in Shakespeare (Princeton University Press, 1972).
Newman, Karen, ‘Cultural Capital’s Gold Standard: Shakespeare and the Critical Apostrophe in Renaissance Studies’, Discontinuities: New Essays in Renaissance Literature and Criticism, ed. Viviana Comensoli and Paul Stevens (University of Toronto Press, 1998), pp. 96–113.
Nietzsche, Friedrich, ‘The Birth of Tragedy’ and ‘The Genealogy of Morals’, trans. Francis Golffing (New York: Doubleday, 1956).
O’Connell, Michael, The Idolatrous Eye: Iconoclasm and Theater in Early Modern England (Oxford University Press, 2000).
Orgel, Stephen, ‘The Authentic Shakespeare’, Representations 21 (1988): 1–25.
Orgel, Stephen, ‘Nobody’s Perfect: or, Why Did the English Stage Take Boys for Women?’, South Atlantic Quarterly 88 (1989): 7–29.
Orgel, Stephen and Sean Keilen, eds., Shakespeare and the Editorial Tradition (New York: Garland, 1999).
Ozment, Steven, The Age of Reform 1250–1550 (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1980).
Ozment, Steven, When Fathers Ruled: Family Life in Reformation Europe (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1983).
Oya, Reiko, Representing Shakespearean Tragedy: Garrick, the Kembles, and Kean (Cambridge University Press, 2007).
Palfrey, Simon and Tiffany Stern, Shakespeare in Parts (Oxford University Press, 2007).
Parker, Kenneth, William Shakespeare: Antony and Cleopatra (Tavistock: Northcote House, 2000).
Parker, Patricia and Geoffrey Hartman, eds., Shakespeare and the Question of Theory (London: Methuen, 1985).
Paster, Gail Kern, Humoring the Body: Emotions and the Shakespearean Stage (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 2004).
Paster, Gail Kern, The Idea of the City in the Age of Shakespeare (Athens: University of Georgia Press, 1985).
Patterson, Annabel, Shakespeare and the Popular Voice (Oxford University Press, 1989).
Paulin, Roger, The Critical Reception of Shakespeare in Germany 1682–1914: Native Literatures and Foreign Genius (New York: George Olms Verlag, 2003).
Prosser, Eleanor, Hamlet and Revenge, 2nd edn (Stanford University Press, 1971).
Puttenham, George, The Arte of English Poesie (1589), ed. G. D. Willcock and A. Walker (Cambridge University Press, 1936).
Rabkin, Norman, Shakespeare and the Common Understanding (New York: Free Press, 1967).
Rackin, Phyllis, ‘Shakespeare’s Boy Cleopatra, the Decorum of Nature, and the Golden World of Poetry’, PMLA 87 (1972): 201–12.
Rebhorn, Wayne A., ‘The Crisis of the Aristocracy in Julius Caesar’, Renaissance Quarterly 43, 1 (1990): 75–111.
Reiss, Timothy, Mirages of the Self: Patterns of Personhood in Ancient and Early Modern Europe (Stanford University Press, 2003).
Richards, I. A., Principles of Literary Criticism (London: Routledge, 1926).
Ritchie, Fiona and Peter Sabor, eds., Shakespeare in the Eighteenth Century (Cambridge University Press, 2012).
Rose, Mark, Shakespearean Design (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1972).
Rosenmeyer, Thomas G., Senecan Drama and Stoic Cosmology (Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press, 1989).
Rossiter, A. P., Angel with Horns: Fifteen Lectures on Shakespeare (London: Hutchinson, 1961).
Rozett, Martha Tucker, The Doctrine of Election and the Emergence of Elizabethan Tragedy (Princeton University Press, 1984).
Rutter, Carol Chillington, Enter the Body: Women and Representation on Shakespeare’s Stage (London: Routledge, 2001).
Sanders, Eve Rachel, ‘The Body of the Actor in Coriolanus’, Shakespeare Quarterly 57, 4 (2006): 387–412
Schoenfeldt, Michael C., Bodies and Selves in Early Modern England: Physiology and Inwardness in Spenser, Shakespeare, Herbert, and Milton (Cambridge University Press, 1999).
Schwartz, Murray and Coppélia Kahn, eds., Representing Shakespeare: New Psychoanalytic Essays (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1980).
Scott, Amy, ‘“Romans, Countrymen and Lovers”: Performing Politics, Sovereign Amity, and Masculinity in Julius Caesar’, Renaissance Papers (2003): 99–117.
Seneca, Four Tragedies and ‘Octavia’, trans. E. F. Watling (London: Penguin, 1966).
Sharrock, Alison, Reading Roman Comedy: Poetics and Playfulness in Plautus and Terence (Cambridge University Press, 2005).
Shuger, Debora, Habits of Thought in the English Renaissance: Religion, Politics, and the Dominant Culture (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1990).
Sibly, John, ‘The Duty of Revenge in Tudor and Stuart Drama’, Review of English Literature 8 (1967): 46–54.
Sidney, Sir Philip, An Apology for Poetry (1595), ed. Geoffrey Shepherd (London: Nelson, 1965).
Siegel, Paul N., ‘“Hamlet, Revenge”: The Uses and Abuses of Historical Criticism’, Shakespeare Survey 45 (1993): 15–26.
Siemon, James R., Shakespearean Iconoclasm (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1985).
Simpson, Percy, ‘The Theme of Revenge in Elizabethan Tragedy’, Proceedings of the British Academy 21 (London: Humphrey Milford, 1935).
Singh, Jyotsna, ‘Renaissance Antitheatricality, Antifeminism, and Shakespeare’s Antony and Cleopatra’, Renaissance Drama 20 (1989): 99–121.
Smith, Bruce, Homosexual Desire in Shakespeare’s England: A Cultural Poetics (Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press, 1991).
Smith, Bruce.Shakespeare and Masculinity (Oxford University Press, 2000).
Smith, Emma, Shakespeare’s Tragedies (Oxford: Blackwell, 2004).
Spencer, T. J. B., ‘“Greeks” and “Merrygreeks”: a Background to Timon of Athens and Troilus and Cressida’, Essays on Shakespeare and Elizabethan Drama in Honor of Hardin Craig, ed. Richard Hosley (Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1962), pp. 223–33.
Spencer, T. J. B., ‘Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Romans’, Shakespeare Survey 10 (1957): 27–38.
Spurgeon, Caroline, Shakespeare’s Imagery and What it Tells Us (1935; rpt Boston: Beacon Hill Press, 1958).
Stavanage, Liberty, ‘“I fear she cannot love at all”: Unnatural Female Sexuality in the Revenge Tragedy’, Genre: An International Journal of Literature and the Arts 28 (2008): 125–43.
Stern, Tiffany, Making Shakespeare: From Stage to Page (London: Routledge, 2004).
Styan, J. S., The Shakespeare Revolution (Cambridge University Press, 1977).
Szondi, Peter, An Essay on the Tragic (Stanford University Press, 2002).
Szonyi, György E. and Rowland Wymer, eds., The Iconography of Power: Ideas and Images of Rulership on the English Renaissance Stage (Szeged: JATE Press, 2000).
Tassi, Marguerite A., Women and Revenge in Shakespeare: Gender, Genre, and Ethics (Cranbury, NJ: Associated University Presses, 2011).
Taylor, Gary and Michael Warren, eds., The Division of the Kingdoms (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).
Thompson, Marvin and Ruth Thompson, eds., Shakespeare and the Sense of Performance (Newark: University of Delaware Press, 1990).
Urkowitz, Steven, Shakespeare’s Revision of ‘King Lear’ (Princeton University Press, 1980).
Vickers, Brian, Appropriating Shakespeare: Contemporary Critical Quarrels (New Haven and London: Yale University Press, 1993).
Vickers, Brian, Shakespeare, Co-Author (Oxford University Press, 2002).
Vickers, Brian, Shakespeare: The Critical Heritage, 6 vols. (London: Routledge, 1974).
Waith, Eugene M., Ideas of Greatness: Heroic Drama in England (London: Hutchinson, 1971).
Walker, Greg, Writing under Tyranny: English Literature and the Henrician Reformation (Oxford University Press, 2005).
Watson, Robert N., Shakespeare and the Hazards of Ambition (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1984).
Watson, Robert N., ‘Shakespeare’s New Words’, Shakespeare Survey 65 (2012): 358–77.
Wayne, Valerie, ed., The Matter of Difference: Materialist Feminist Criticism of Shakespeare (Ithaca, NY, and London: Cornell University Press, 1991).
Wiemann, Robert, ‘Representation and Performance: the Uses of Authority in Shakespeare’s Theater’, Materialist Shakespeare: A History, ed. Ivo Kamps (London: Verso, 1995), pp. 198–217.
Wells, Robin Headlam, Shakespeare, Politics and the State (Basingstoke: Macmillan, 1986).
Wells, Stanley, Re-Editing Shakespeare for the Modern Reader (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984).
Wells, Stanley, ed., The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare Studies (Cambridge University Press, 1986).
Werstine, Paul, ‘A Century of “Bad” Shakespeare Quartos’, Shakespeare Quarterly 50 (1999): 310–33.
Werstine, Paul, ‘Narratives about Printed Shakespeare Texts: “Foul Papers” and “Bad” Quartos’, Shakespeare Quarterly 41 (1990): 67–86.
Wheeler, Richard P., Shakespeare’s Development and the Problem Comedies: Turn and Counter-Turn (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1981).
Whigham, Frank and Wayne A. Rebhorn, eds., The Art of English Poesy by George Puttenham(Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007).
White, Paul, Theatre and Reformation (Cambridge University Press, 1993).
Williams, Raymond, Modern Tragedy (London: Chatto and Windus, 1966).
Willis, Debora, ‘“The gnawing vulture”: Revenge, Trauma Theory, and Titus Andronicus’, Shakespeare Quarterly 53, 1 (2002): 21–52.
Woodbridge, Linda, English Revenge Drama: Money, Resistance, Equality (Cambridge University Press, 2010).
Wright, George T., Shakespeare’s Metrical Art (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1988).