Skip to main content
×
Home
The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 3
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Pelkey, Jamin 2016. Symbiotic modeling: Linguistic anthropology and the promise of chiasmus. Reviews in Anthropology, Vol. 45, Issue. 1, p. 22.


    Enfield, N.J. 2015. Linguistic Relativity from Reference to Agency. Annual Review of Anthropology, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 207.


    2015. Coordination in language: Temporality and time-ranging. Interaction Studies, Vol. 16, Issue. 3, p. 474.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology
    • Online ISBN: 9781139342872
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

The field of linguistic anthropology looks at human uniqueness and diversity through the lens of language, our species' special combination of art and instinct. Human language both shapes, and is shaped by, our minds, societies, and cultural worlds. This state-of-the-field survey covers a wide range of topics, approaches and theories, such as the nature and function of language systems, the relationship between language and social interaction, and the place of language in the social life of communities. Promoting a broad vision of the subject, spanning a range of disciplines from linguistics to biology, from psychology to sociology and philosophy, this authoritative handbook is an essential reference guide for students and researchers working on language and culture across the social sciences.

Reviews

‘Masquerading under the humble rubric of a 'Handbook', this stunning collection of original essays juxtaposes many of the central senior figures of linguistic anthropology with an impressive array of younger voices - including the editors themselves - shaking the mix further by sometimes unexpected but always provocative conjunctions of themes and expertise. It presents fresh evidence for why theoretical advances stemming from a preoccupation with language now inform the best of current anthropological thinking more widely. The collection not only spans an impressive range of linguistic and transdisciplinary topics, but also reflects the main centers of research and discovery in modern linguistic anthropology.’

John B. Haviland - University of California, San Diego

‘This extraordinarily stimulating book is a thoughtfully composed collection of fresh perspectives on five major themes in the anthropology of language.’

Anthony C. Woodbury - University of Texas, Austin

'Continuing the excellent Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics series … the editors have assembled a superb line-up of contributors who represent the diversity of perspectives within linguistic anthropology … the limited scope of each chapter helps to narrow focus and provide depth. Used in conjunction with a textbook or additional readings, specific chapters could be profitably used in upper-level undergraduate courses. Graduate students and professionals will appreciate the index and comprehensive bibliographies provided with each chapter … Summing up: highly recommended. All academic levels/libraries.'

E. Pappas Source: Choice

'The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology is an intellectually stimulating and wide-ranging compilation that is sure to spark discussion on its vision of the field. In many ways, it offers a rebuke of what the editors see as the weaknesses of linguistic anthropology, as the introduction notes that the contributors to the volume include ‘scholars who take their linguistics as seriously as their anthropology’, who use methods ‘far beyond ethnography and descriptive linguistics’, and who ‘study processes far beyond the historical and the cultural.’

Adrienne Lo Source: Journal of Sociolinguistics

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

Page 1 of 2


  • Part I - System and function
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.035
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter is meant to characterize the core theoretical claims of linguistic anthropology while, simultaneously, critiquing the cultural logic underlying its practices of claim-making. It takes a critical look at theory in the discipline of linguistic anthropology by foregrounding its dependence on certain moves in critical theory. The chapter summarizes a dozen or so relatively axiomatic commitments of linguistic anthropologists. Many of the core moves aren't from linguistic anthropology proper, but have been adopted by linguistic anthropologists from other fields, making our discipline seem like an incredibly stream-lined device for sieving wheat from chaff. Like many other disciplines, linguistic anthropology has traditionally been interested in two particular modes of mediation. The chapter discusses four complications in detail: framing, embedding, disturbances, and meta-mediation. Linguistic anthropology has taken up as its foundational axiom Boride's famous claim that practice mediates both structure and ideology which themselves mediate practice.
  • 6 - Denotation and the pragmatics of language
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.007
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This introductory chapter points out some issues that are central to the anthropology of language. The subdiscipline of linguistic anthropology in the narrow sense is an indispensable source of questions, methods, and solutions in the anthropology of language. The chapter raises some challenges that linguistic anthropology must meet, articulates the questions that define these challenges. It focuses on the implications of a causal account of linguistic transmission, given that the human mind is the niche in which language is propagated and to which language systems come to be adapted. A way to look at the language-culture relation is to examine how the grammatical structures and sub-systems of different languages encode semantic distinctions that appear to correlate with special cultural concerns of the language's speakers. The chapter provides how the other chapters are organized in the book.
  • Part II - Process and formation
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.036
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter outlines the general convergence of theoretical sensibilities between linguistic anthropology and sociocultural anthropology over the last four decades. It explores some reasons for the fields' separateness, including imaginative limitations to the ideas of representation held by sociocultural anthropologists, and limitations on linguistic anthropologists' valuing of the ethnographic monograph. The chapter opens up one important question at the heart of these two fields' relation, namely the issue of distinctions and interconnections between linguistic and more-than-linguistic layers of human worlds. It surveys a few ways anthropologists today join together linguistic and more-than-linguistic materials theoretically. The chapter supports greater recognition of unity of figurational processes across human lifeworlds. It suggest this unity can be productively articulated at least in an initial way by extending the concepts of indexicality and iconicity more widely than is commonly done.
  • 8 - Language acquisition and language socialization
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.010
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter proposes that the ideas of cultural item and cultural system are reconciled by something that they have in common: Neither idea exists without the simpler idea of a functional relation. Functional relations are the interface that joins items and systems together, and one can look to them for a solution to the item/system problem. Culture and language hinge on shared meaning, and so the chapter focuses on semiotic systems. The idea of a semiotic system is well illustrated in Darwin's account of the expression of emotion in animals. The chapter also proposes a minimal causal scheme for biased transmission which has four functionally defined loci at which any transmission bias may contribute to regulating the cumulative transmission of culture. In language, items are structured into conceptual frames, systems of categorization, semplates, conceptual metaphors, structural paradigms, and syntagms.
  • 9 - Language and the manual modality The communicative resilience of the human species
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.011
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter describes what happens to the manual modality under two distinct circumstances: (1) when it accompanies speech, and thus forms part of language; and (2) when it is used instead of speech as the primary modality for communication, and thus is itself language. It turns to the form co-speech gesture assumes and then explores its communicative and cognitive functions. Co-speech gesture is thus not structured like a conventional linguistic system. It has its own representational properties, which work together with speech to form an integrated system. The information gesture conveys can be quite different from the information conveyed in the speech it accompanies. The chapter describes the hand movements people produce in the absence of speech, deals with conventional sign languages created by deaf communities. Sign languages of the deaf are autonomous languages, independent of the spoken languages of hearing cultures.
  • 10 - Language emergence
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.012
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter illustrates the various ways in which languages differ from each other and then raises the question in what sense one can talk about universals despite this apparent diversity and variation. It reviews the extent of the diversity that we know from today's languages in the world, by highlighting the core domains of language: phonology, morphology, syntax, and semantics. In the chapter, the author uses the term language in the sense of a structure identifier, and applies it to any kind of variant set of structures, including dialects, sociolects, and idiolects. The range and nature of absolute universals depends entirely on the nature of the analysis and the descriptive metalanguage that one uses for a particular phenomenon. The criterion of historical realism is foundational for research on statistical as opposed to absolute universals because statistical universals are fundamentally historical in nature.
  • 11 - Endangered languages
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.013
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The semiotic ideology of the Enlightenment project focused a suspicious, indeed somewhat negative intuitive regard on how language essentially mediates the majority of interpersonal human phenomena, in the Western tradition those mediations having long since been subsumed under the rubric of rhetoric. Immanent in and essential to language as the central sociocultural semiotic is, its peculiar character is as a dialectical socio-semiotic phenomenon in which denotation, to be sure, plays several roles. Language manifests a tension between what is encompassed in a denotational model so central to the intuitions of both laypersons and professional students of language in the West, and discourse as practice in a sociologically or socioculturally informed perspective. These two functionalities engage reciprocally through several planes of metapragmatic reflexivity. This tension can be displayed and examined by developing a (meta-) semiotic from generally Peircean principles.
  • 12 - Language evolution
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.014
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter overviews scholarship in functional linguistics, and focuses on constituency, a specific problem which has attracted significant attention from functionalists. It examines constituency from the perspective of a natural outgrowth of functionalism in linguistics, namely a concern with the function of grammar in its ecological habitat, conversational interaction. Functional approaches to patterning in language, then, have recently shifted the focus away from synchrony to diachrony and grammaticization. The chapter explores the role of constituent schemas in allowing conversational interactants to produce and monitor turns at talk for their trajectories and what it might take for them to be finished. It discusses three ways in which constituency works to help speakers manage interactional tasks. The operations of projection, expansion, and retraction are first and foremost interactional tasks, for which constituent schemas afford a solution.
  • Part III - Interaction and intersubjectivity
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.037
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The view of language as encoding predefined and enduring messages is what truly separated sociolinguistics in the early years from linguistic anthropology. A sociolinguistic variable is a set of competing linguistic forms (variants), whose patterns of occurrence are socially determined and potentially socially meaningful. The study of patterns calls for quantification and a focus on meaning raises interesting questions in a basically probabilistic enterprise. In stylistic practice, speakers make social-semiotic moves, reinterpreting variants, and combining and recombining them in a continual process of bricolage as highly idiosyncratic resources may combine with more widespread ones to construct a nuanced persona. Stylistic practice is a continual reinvention of meaning as speakers individually and severally move through situations and through time and across the life span. Stylistic practice can also be an important force in social change.
  • 14 - Intentionality and language
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.017
  • View abstract
    Summary
    In this chapter, the author suggests that researchers working at the intersection of language, society, and history would benefit from an approach that more fully integrates the insights of both lines of inquiry. Linguistic anthropologists have approached the language-society-history nexus by analyzing how developments in media technology drive historical, social, and linguistic processes. Comparative historical linguistics has been a primary field in which language, culture, and history have been united analytically. Thus when joined to nuanced understandings of relationships between communities and linguistic patterns, comparative historical linguistic research can produce results harmonious with anthropological inquiry into language, society, and history. The field differentially integrates methods and theories from a diverse set of disciplines, including social history, historical linguistics, linguistic anthropology, and critical theory. Linguistic anthropologists have a range of tools available for producing holistic, nuanced understandings of the field shared by language, society, and history.
  • 15 - The architecture of intersubjectivity revisited
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.018
  • View abstract
    Summary
    Humans naturally acquire the language or languages that they are exposed to in early childhood, but these languages are different from one another and are all the product of historical change over many millennia, much of it resulting from chance. Natural sign languages are social creations that emerge in communities with an acute need to communicate. Many sign languages in Europe and North America developed from the establishment of schools for deaf children through the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. The study of new sign languages such as Al-Sayyid Bedouin Sign Language (ABSL) offers a real-life view of how a language emerges a new, how it conventionalizes and spreads across users in a community. A fundamental property of human language is the existence of syntax, the level of organization that contains conventions for combining symbolic units, the words. The chapter also discusses lexicons, phonology, morphology, and semantics that characterize language.
  • 16 - Language and human sociality
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.019
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The awareness of endangered languages is part of a larger picture, arising out of social and political changes in the past decades. This awareness has brought about many changes in linguistics. This chapter reviews background material, including the language situation around the world, causes of language endangerment, reasons why language endangerment has garnered the concern that it has in the past few decades, and responses to language endangerment. The increasing recognition among linguists of how many languages were endangered encouraged a greater emphasis on fieldwork. This in turn promoted discussions of language documentation, language revitalization, and the ethics of fieldwork. The nature of language is much discussed in the anthropological responses to the endangerment literature. Current methods of language documentation focus on audio and video recordings of natural speech, narrative and conversation, as well as structured elicitation.
  • 17 - The ontology of action, in interaction
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.020
  • View abstract
    Summary
    The subject of language evolution has experienced a boom in international conferences monographs, textbooks, and learned papers. This chapter covers two subjects that many would consider essentially unrelated: the evolution of the underlying biology that makes language possible on the one hand, and the processes underlying language change and diversification on the other. The chapter considers the range of new data that gives insights into the time course of the biological evolution of language capacities. It turns to cultural evolution and introduces the new methods that are revolutionizing this area. The chapter also considers the evidence for ongoing relations between biological and cultural evolution. Ongoing interactions between genes and spoken languages are less visible, but almost certainly in play. It has been shown that even slight biological or cognitive biases can become amplified through cultural transmission.
  • 18 - Conversation across cultures
  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342872.021
  • View abstract
    Summary
    This chapter sketches that larger conceptual apparatus by defining a set of six frames that are useful for orienting work in the anthropology of language. The frames are qualitatively distinguished in terms of the different types of underlying processes and causal-conditional mechanisms that define them. Each of the six frames, microgenetic, ontogenetic, phylogenetic, enchronic, diachronic, synchronic (M.O.P.E.D.S) is distinct from the others in terms of the kind of causality it implies, and thus in its relevance to what we are asking about language and its relation to culture and other aspects of human diversity. In a microgenetic frame, the author considers the processes by which linguistic behaviors such as simple utterances are psychologically processed. In an ontogenetic frame considers the processes by which an individual's linguistic capabilities and habits are acquired and/or change during the course of that individual's lifetime.

Page 1 of 2


This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, edited by Paul de Lacy

The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Code-switching, edited by Barbara E. Bullock and Almeida Jacqueline Toribio

The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages, edited by Peter K. Austin and Julia Sallabank

The Cambridge Handbook of Sociolinguistics, edited by Rajend Mesthrie

The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics, edited by Keith Allan and Kasia M. Jaszczolt

The Cambridge Handbook of Language Policy, edited by Bernard Spolsky

The Cambridge Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, edited by Julia Herschensohn and Martha Young-Scholten

The Cambridge Handbook of Biolinguistics, edited by Cedric Boeckx and Kleanthes K. Grohmann

The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, edited by Marcel den Dikken

The Cambridge Handbook of Communication Disorders, edited by Louise Cummings

The Cambridge Handbook of Stylistics, edited by Peter Stockwell and Sara Whiteley

The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, edited by N. J. Enfield , Paul Kockelman , and Jack Sidnell

The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics, edited by Douglas Biber and Randi Reppen

The Cambridge Handbook of Formal Semantics, edited by Maria Aloni and Paul Dekker

The Cambridge Handbook of English Historical Linguistics, edited by Merja Kytö and Päivi Pahta

Laura M. Ahearn 2011. Living Language: An Introduction to Linguistic Anthropology. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Brent Berlin . 1992. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Robert C. Berwick , Angela D. Friederici , Noam Chomsky , and Johan J. Bolhuis . 2013. Evolution, Brain, and the Nature of Language. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 17: 89–98.

L. Boroditsky 2000. Metaphoric Structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75(1): 1–28.

L. Boroditsky 2001. Does language shape thought? English and Mandarin speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology 43(1): 1–22.

Pierre Bourdieu . 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Roger Brown . 1958a. How Shall a Thing Be Called? Psychological Review 65: 14–21.

Roger Brown , and Eric H. Lenneberg . 1954. A Study in Language and Cognition. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 49: 454–62.

Morten H. Christiansen , and Nick Chater . 2008. Language as Shaped by the Brain. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31 (5): 489–509.

Herbert H. Clark 1996. Using Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

William Croft . 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Alessandro Duranti . 2001. Linguistic Anthropology: A Reader. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

Alessandro Duranti . 2003. Language as Culture in U. S. Anthropology: Three paradigms. Current Anthropology 44(3): 323–47.

N. J. Enfield 2009. The Anatomy of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jerry A. Fodor 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Erving Goffman . 1976. Replies and Responses. Language in Society 5 (03): 257–313.

John J. Gumperz 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

William F. Hanks 2005. Pierre Bourdieu and the Practices of Language. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 67–83.

Marc D. Hauser , Noam A. Chomsky , and W. Tecumseh Fitch . 2002. The Faculty of Language: What Is It, Who Has It, and How Did It Evolve? Science 298: 1569–79.

Charles F. Hockett 1960. The Origin of Speech. Scientific American 203: 89–96.

Dorothy Holland , and Naomi Quinn , eds. 1987. Cultural Models in Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Eugene Hunn . 1982. The Utilitarian Factor in Folk Biological Classification. American Anthropologist 89: 146–9.

James R. Hurford 2003. The Neural Basis of Predicate-argument Structure. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (3): 261–82.

Paul Kockelman . 2010. Language, Culture, and Mind: Natural Constructions and Social Kinds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Elizabeth F. Loftus , and John C. Palmer . 1974. Reconstruction of Automobile Destruction: An Example of the Interaction Between Language and Memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 13 (5): 585–9.

A. Majid , M. Bowerman , S. Kita , D. B. M. Haun , and S. C. Levinson . 2004. Can Language Restructure Cognition? The case for space. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(3): 108–14.

Mark Pagel , Quentin D. Atkinson , and Andrew Meade . 2007. Frequency of Word-use Predicts Rates of Lexical Evolution Throughout Indo-European History. Nature 449: 717–20. doi:10.1038/nature06176.

Steven Pinker . 1998. Obituary: Roger Brown. Cognition 66: 199–213.

Jonathan W. Schooler , and Tonya Y. Engstler-Schooler . 1990. Verbal Overshadowing of Visual Memories: Some Things Are Better Left Unsaid. Cognitive Psychology 22 (1): 36–71.

John R. Searle 2010. Making the Social World: The Structure of Human Civilization. New York: Oxford University Press.

Jack Sidnell , and N. J. Enfield . 2012. Language Diversity and Social Action. Current Anthropology 53 (3): 302–33.

Jack Sidnell , and Merav Shohet . 2013. The Problem of Peers in Vietnamese Interaction. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19(3): 618–38.

Kenny Smith , and Elizabeth Wonnacott . 2010. Eliminating Unpredictable Variation through Iterated Learning. Cognition 116: 444–9.

James W. Stigler , James A. Shweder , and Gilbert Herdt , eds. 1990. Cultural Psychology: Essays on Comparative Human Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Michael Tomasello , Malinda Carpenter , Josep Call , Tanya Behne , and Henrike Moll . 2005. Understanding and Sharing Intentions: The Origins of Cultural Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (5): 664–70.

R. M. W. Dixon 1972. The Dyirbal Language of North Queensland. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

A. M. Halpern 1942. Yuma Kinship Terms. American Anthropologist 44: 425–41.

Alexandra Y. Aikhenvald , and R. M. W. Dixon . 1998. Dependencies Between Grammatical Systems. Language 74(1): 56–80.

Charles Darwin . 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.

Charles Darwin . 1872. The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: J. Murray.

N. J. Enfield 2005. Areal Linguistics and Mainland Southeast Asia. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 181–206.

N. J. Enfield 2007. A Grammar of Lao. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

N. J. Enfield 2008. Transmission Biases in Linguistic Epidemiology. Journal of Language Contact THEMA 2: 295–306.

Martin Haspelmath . 2004. How Hopeless Is Genealogical Linguistics, and How Advanced Is Areal Linguistics? Studies in Language 28(1): 209–23.

Peter Hedström , and Richard Swedberg . 1998. Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

R. A. Hill , and Robin I. M. Dunbar . 2003. Social Network Size in Humans. Human Nature 14: 53–72.

R. A. Hudson 1996. Sociolinguistics. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Simon Kirby . 2013. Transitions: The Evolution of Linguistic Replicators. In The Language Phenomenon, 121–38. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.

Peter F. MacNeilage 1998. The Frame/content Theory of Evolution of Speech Production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21(04): 499–511.

Yaron Matras . Language Contact. 2009. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Patrick McConvell . 1985. The Origin of Subsections in Northern Australia. Oceania 56(1): 1–33.

James Milroy and Lesley Milroy . 1985. Linguistic Change, Social Network and Speaker Innovation. Journal of Linguistics 21(2): 339–84.

Salikoko S. Mufwene 2001. The Ecology of Language Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Max Müller . 1870. Darwinism Tested by the Science of Language. Nature 1(10): 256–9.

J. Parry , and Maurice Bloch , eds. 1989. Money and the Morality of Exchange. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

S. T. Piantadosi , Harry Tily , and Edward Gibson . 2011. Word Lengths Are Optimized for Efficient Communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108(9): 3526.

A. R. Radcliffe-Brown 1931. The Social Organization of Australian Tribes: Part III. Oceania 1(4): 426–56.

Harvey Sacks , Emanuel A. Schegloff , and Gail Jefferson . 1974. A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-taking for Conversation. Language 50(4): 696–735.

Marshall Sahlins . 1999. What Is Anthropological Enlightenment? Some Lessons of the Twentieth Century. Annual Review of Anthropology 28(1): i–xxiii. doi:10.1146/annurev.anthro.28.1.0.

Dan Sperber . 1985. Anthropology and Psychology: Towards an Epidemiology of Representations. Man 20: 73–89.

Dan Sperber , and Lawrence A. Hirschfeld . 2004. The Cognitive Foundations of Cultural Stability and Diversity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 8(1): 40–6.

Anna Wierzbicka . 1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

M. W. Alibali , and A. A. DiRusso . 1999. The Function of Gesture in Learning to Count: More than keeping track. Cognitive Development 14: 37–56.

M. W. Alibali , L. Flevares , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 1997. Assessing Knowledge Conveyed in Gesture: Do teachers have the upper hand? Journal of Educational Psychology 89: 183–93.

M. W. Alibali and S. Goldin-Meadow . 1993. Gesture–Speech Mismatch and Mechanisms of Learning: What the hands reveal about a child’s state of mind. Cognitive Psychology 25: 468–523.

M. W. Alibali , S. Kita , and A. J. Young . 2000. Gesture and the Process of Speech Production: We think, therefore we gesture. Language and Cognitive Processes 15: 593–613.

D. H. Ballard , M. M. Hayhoe , P. K. Pook , and R. P. N. Rao . 1997. Deictic Codes for the Embodiment of Cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20: 723–67.

G. Beattie , and J. Coughlan . 1999. An Experimental Investigation of the Role of Iconic Gestures in Lexical Access Using the Tip-of-the-tongue Phenomenon. British Journal of Psychology 90: 35–56.

G. Beattie , and H. Shovelton . 2000. Iconic Hand Gestures and the Predictability of Words in Context in Spontaneous Speech. British Journal of Psychology 91: 473–91.

G. Beattie , and H. Shovelton . 2002. What Properties of Talk are Associated with the Generation of Spontaneous Iconic Hand Gestures? British Journal of Social Psychology 41: 403–17

J. D. Bonvillian , M. O. Orlansky , and L. L. Novack . 1983. Developmental Milestones: Sign language acquisition and motor development. Child Development 54: 1435–45.

D. Brentari , M. Coppola , L. Mazzoni , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 2012. When Does a System Become Phonological? Handshape production in gesturers, signers, and homesigners. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30(1): 1–31.

S. Broaders , S. W. Cook , Z. Mitchell , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 2007. Making Children Gesture Brings Out Implicit Knowledge and Leads to Learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136 (4): 539–50.

S. Broaders , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 2010. Truth Is At Hand: How gesture adds information during investigative interviews. Psychological Science 21(5): 623–8.

C. Butcher , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 2000. Gesture and the Transition from One- to Two-Word Speech: When hand and mouth come together. In Language and gesture, ed. D. McNeill , 235–57. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

C. Butcher , C. Mylander , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 1991. Displaced Communication in a Self-styled Gesture System: Pointing at the non-present. Cognitive Development 6: 315–42.

P Chawla . and R. Krauss . 1994. Gesture and Speech in Spontaneous and Rehearsed Narratives. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 30: 580–601.

R. B. Church , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 1986. The Mismatch between Gesture and Speech as an Index of Transitional Knowledge. Cognition 23: 43–71.

S. W. Cook , and M. K. Tanenhaus . 2009. Embodied Communication: Speakers’ gestures affect listeners’ actions. Cognition 113: 98–104.

S. W. Cook , T. K. Yip , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 2010. Gesturing Makes Memories that Last. Journal of Memory and Language 63(4): 465–75.

M. Coppola , and E. Newport . 2005. Grammatical Subjects in Homesign: Abstract linguistic structure in adult primary gesture systems without linguistic input. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 102: 19249–53.

M. Coppola , and A. Senghas . 2010. The Emergence of Deixis in Nicaraguan Signing. In Sign Languages: A Cambridge Language Survey, ed. D. Brentari , 543–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

M. Coppola , E. Spaepen , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 2013. Communicating about Quantity without a Language Model: Number devices in homesign grammar. Cognitive Psychology 67, 1–25.

K. Emmorey 1999. Do Signers Gesture? In Gesture, Speech, and Sign, ed. L. S. Messing and R. Campbell , 133–59. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

N. J. Enfield 2005. The Body as a Cognitive Artifact in Kinship Representations: Hand gesture diagrams by speakers of Lao. Current Anthropology 46(1): 51–81.

A. Franklin , A. Giannakidou , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 2011. Negation, Questions, and Structure Building in a Homesign System. Cognition 118 (3): 398–416.

D. Frick-Horbury , and R. E. Guttentag . 1998. The Effects of Restricting Hand Gesture Production on Lexical Retrieval and Free Recall. American Journal of Psychology 111: 44–61.

L. Gershkoff-Stowe , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 2002. Is There a Natural Order for Expressing Semantic Relations. Cognitive Psychology 45 (3): 375–412.

S. Goldin-Meadow , C. Butcher , C. Mylander , and M. Dodge . 1994. Nouns and Verbs in a Self-Styled Gesture System: What’s in a name? Cognitive Psychology 27: 259–319.

S. Goldin-Meadow , S. W. Cook , and Z. A. Mitchell . 2009. Gesturing Gives Children New Ideas About Math. Psychological Science 20(3): 267–72.

S. Goldin-Meadow , S. Gelman , and C. Mylander 2005. Expressing Generic Concepts with and without a Language Model. Cognition, 96, 109–126.

S. Goldin-Meadow , D. McNeill , and J. Singleton . 1996. Silence is Liberating: Removing the handcuffs on grammatical expression in the manual modality. Psychological Review 103: 34–55.

S. Goldin-Meadow , and C. Mylander . 1983. Gestural Communication in Deaf Children: The non-effects of parental input on language development. Science 221: 372–4.

S. Goldin-Meadow , and C. Mylander . 1984. Gestural Communication in Deaf Children: The effects and non-effects of parental input on early language development. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 49: 1–121.

S. Goldin-Meadow , C. Mylander , and C. Butcher . 1995. The Resilience of Combinatorial Structure at the Word Level: Morphology in self-styled gesture systems. Cognition 56: 195–262.

S. Goldin-Meadow , C. Mylander , and A. Franklin . 2007. How Children Make Language out of Gesture: Morphological structure in gesture systems developed by American and Chinese deaf children. Cognitive Psychology 55: 87–135.

S. Goldin-Meadow , H. Nusbaum , S. D. Kelly , and S. Wagner . 2001. Explaining Math: Gesturing lightens the load. Psychological Sciences: 12: 516–22.

S. Goldin-Meadow and C. M. Sandhofer . 1999. Gesture Conveys Substantive Information About a Child’s Thoughts to Ordinary Listeners. Developmental Science 2: 67–74.

S. Goldin-Meadow , A. Shield , D. Lenzen , M. Herzig , and C. Padden . 2012. The Gestures ASL Signers Use Tell Us When They Are Ready to Learn Math, Cognition 123, 448–453.

S. Goldin-Meadow , and M. A. Singer . 2003. From Children’s Hands to Adults’ Ears: Gesture’s role in teaching and learning. Developmental Psychology 39 (3): 509–20.

S. Goldin-Meadow , W.-C. So , A. Özyürek , and C. Mylander (2008). The Natural Order of Events: How speakers of different languages represent events nonverbally. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105(27): 9163–8.

S. Goldin-Meadow , D. Wein , and C. Chang . 1992. Assessing Knowledge Through Gesture: Using children’s hands to read their minds. Cognition and Instruction 9: 201–19.

J. A. Graham , and M. Argyle . 1975. A Cross-Cultural Study of the Communication of Extra-Verbal Meaning by Gestures. International Journal of Psychology 10: 57–67.

U. Hadar , A. Burstein , R. Krauss , and N. Soroker . 1998. Ideational Gestures and Speech in Brain-Damaged Subjects. Language and Cognitive Processes 13: 59–76.

A. B. Hostetter , and M. W. Alibali . 2007. Raise Your Hand If You’re Spatial: Relations between verbal and spatial skills and gesture production. Gesture 7, 73–95.

D. Hunsicker , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 2012. Hierarchical Structure in a Self-Created Communication System: Building nominal constituents in homesign. Language 88(4): 732–63.

J. M. Iverson , and M. K. Fagan . 2004. Infant Vocal-Motor Coordination: Precursor to the gesture-speech system? Child Development 75: 1053–66.

J. M. Iverson , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 1998. Why People Gesture as they Speak. Nature 396: 228.

S. D. Kelly , and R. B. Church . 1998. A Comparison Between Children’s and Adults’ Ability to Detect Conceptual Information Conveyed Through Representational Gestures. Child Development 69: 85–93.

S. D. Kelly , C. Kravitz , and M. Hopkins . 2004. Neural Correlates of Bimodal Speech and Gesture Comprehension. Brain and Language 89: 253–60.

S. Kita 2000. How Representational Gestures Help Speaking. In Language and Gesture: Window into Thought and Action, ed. D. McNeill , 162–85. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

S. Kita , and T. S. Davies . 2009. Competing Conceptual Representations Trigger Co-Speech Representational Gestures. Language and Cognitive Processes 24: 761–75.

S. Kita , and A. Özyürek . 2003. What Does Cross-Linguistic Variation in Semantic Coordination of Speech and Gesture Reveal? Evidence for an interface representation of spatial thinking and speaking. Journal of Memory and Language 48(1): 16–32.

S. Kita , A. Özyürek , S. Allen , A. Brown , R. Furman , and T. Ishizuka . 2007. Relations Between Syntactic Encoding and Co-Speech Gestures: Implications for a model of speech and gesture production. Language and Cognitive Processes 22: 1212–36.

A. Langus , and M. Nespor . 2010. Cognitive Systems Struggling for Word Order. Cognitive Psychology 60: 291–318.

N. McNeil , M. W. Alibali , and J. L. Evans . 2000. The Role of Gesture in Children’s Comprehension of Spoken Language: Now they need it, now they don’t. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 24: 131–50.

J. McWhorter 1998. Identifying the Creole Prototype: Vindicating a typological class. Language 74: 788–818.

R. P. Meier 1987. Elicited Imitation of Verb Agreement in American Sign Language: Iconically or morphologically determined? Journal of Memory and Language 26: 362–76.

A. Melinger and S. Kita 2007. Conceptualisation Load Triggers Gesture Production. Language and Cognitive Processes 22, 473–500.

J. P. Morford , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 1997. From Here to There and Now to Then: The development of displaced reference in homesign and English. Child Development 68: 420–35.

E. Morsella , and R. M. Krauss 2005. Muscular Activity in the Arm during Lexical Retrieval: Implications for gesture–speech theories. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 34, 415–427.

A. Özyürek , R. M. Willems , S. Kita , and P. Hagoort . 2007. On-line Integration of Semantic Information from Speech and Gesture: Insights from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19(4): 605–16.

M. Perry , R. B. Church , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 1988. Transitional Knowledge in the Acquisition of Concepts. Cognitive Development 3: 359–400.

S. B. Phillips , S. Goldin-Meadow , and P. J. Miller . 2001. Enacting Stories, Seeing Worlds: Similarities and differences in the cross-cultural narrative development of linguistically isolated deaf children. Human Development 44: 311–36.

K. J. Pine , H. Bird , and E. Kirk . 2007. The Effects of Prohibiting Gestures on Children’s Lexical Retrieval Ability. Developmental Science 10: 747–54.

K. J. Pine , N. Lufkin , and D. Messer . 2004. More Gestures than Answers: Children learning about balance. Developmental Psychology 40: 1059–106.

R. M. Ping , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 2010. Gesturing Saves Cognitive Resources When Talking About Nonpresent Objects. Cognitive Science 34: 602–19.

F. H. Rauscher , R. M. Krauss , and Y. Chen . 1996. Gesture, Speech, and Lexical Access: The Role of Lexical Movements in Speech Production. Psychological Science 7: 226–31.

W. Sandler and D. Lillo-Martin . 2006. Sign Language and Linguistic Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

W. Sandler , I. Meir , C. Padden , and M. Aronoff . 2005. The Emergence of Grammar: Systematic structure in a new language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of America 102: 2661–5.

G. B. Saxe , and R. Kaplan . 1981. Gesture in Early Counting: A developmental analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills 53: 851–4.

A. Senghas 2003. Intergenerational Influence and Ontogenetic Development in the Emergence of Spatial Grammar in Nicaraguan Sign Language. Cognitive Development 18: 511–31.

A. Senghas , and M. Coppola . 2001. Children Creating Language: How Nicaraguan Sign Language acquired a spatial grammar. Psychological Science 12: 323–8.

H. Shintel , and H. C. Nusbaum . 2008. Moving to the Speed of Sound: Context modulation of the effect of acoustic properties of speech. Cognitive Science 32(6): 1063–74.

L. Silverman , L. Bennetto , E. Campana , and M. K. Tanenhaus . 2010. Speech-and-Gesture Integration in High Functioning Autism. Cognition 115: 380–93.

M. A. Singer , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 2005. Children Learn When Their Teachers’ Gestures and Speech Differ. Psychological Science 16: 85–9.

J. L. Singleton , J. P. Morford , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 1993. Once Is Not Enough: Standards of well-formedness in manual communication created over three different timespans. Language 69: 683–715.

L. A. Thompson , and D. W. Massaro . 1994. Children’s Integration of Speech and Pointing Gestures in Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 57: 327–54.

S. Wagner , H. Nusbaum , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 2004. Probing the Mental Representation of Gesture: Is handwaving spatial? Journal of Memory and Language 50: 395–407.

R. Wesp , J. Hesse , D. Keutmann , and K. Wheaton 2001. Gestures Maintain Spatial Imagery. American Journal of Psychology, 114, 591–600.

M. Wexler , S. M. Kosslyn , and A. Berthoz 1998. Motor Processes in Mental Rotation. Cognition 68, 77–94.

Y. C. Wu , and S. Coulson . 2007. How Iconic Gestures Enhance Communication: An ERP study. Brain and Language 101: 234–45.

W. Wundt 1973. The Language of Gestures. The Hague: Mouton and Co. (Originally published in 1900.)

Balthasar Bickel . 2007. Typology in the 21st Century: Major current developments. Linguistic Typology 11: 239–51.

Balthasar Bickel . 2011b. Statistical Modeling of Language Universals. Linguistic Typology 15: 401–14.

Balthasar Bickel . 2013. Distributional Biases in Language Families. In Language Typology and Historical Contingency: Studies in Honor of Johanna Nichols, ed. Balthasar Bickel , Lenore A. Grenoble , David A. Peterson , and Alan Timberlake , 415–44. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Balthasar Bickel , Goma Banjade , Martin Gaenszle , Elena Lieven , Netra Paudyal , Ichchha P. Rai , Manoj Rai , Novel K. Rai , and Sabine Stoll . 2007. Free Prefix Ordering in Chintang. Language 83: 43–73.

Balthasar Bickel , Kristine Hildebrandt and René Schiering . 2009. The Distribution of Phonological Word Domains: A probabilistic typology. In Phonological Domains: Universals and Deviations, ed. Janet Grijzenhout and Bariş Kabak , 47–75. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Juliette Blevins . 2004. Evolutionary Phonology: The Emergence of Sound Patterns. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Juliette Blevins . 2012. Duality of Patterning: Absolute universal or statistical tendency? Language and Cognition 4: 275–96.

Ina Bornkessel , and Matthias Schlesewsky . 2006. Generalized Semantic Roles and Syntactic Templates: A new framework for language comprehension. In Semantic Role Universals and Argument Linking: Theoretical, Typological and Psycholinguistic Perspectives, ed. Ina Bornkessel , Matthias Schlesewsky , Bernard Comrie and Angela D. Friederici , 327–53. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.

Noam Chomsky . 2010. Some Simple Evo Devo Theses: How true might they be for language? In The Evolution of Human Language: Biolinguistic Perspectives, ed. Richard K. Larson , Viviane Déprez , and Hiroko Yamakido , 45–62. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Alexander S. Clark , and Shalom Lappin . 2011. Linguistic Nativism and the Poverty of the Stimulus. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

Michael Cysouw . 2003. Against Implicational Universals. Linguistic Typology 7: 89–110.

Matthew S. Dryer 1989. Large Linguistic Areas and Language Sampling. Studies in Language 13: 257–92.

Matthew S. Dryer 1992. The Greenbergian Word Order Correlations. Language 68: 81–138.

Michael J. Dunn , Simon J. Greenhill , Stephen C. Levinson , and Russell D. Gray . 2011. Evolved Structure of Language Shows Lineage-Specific Trends in Word-Order Universals. Nature 473: 79–82.

Daniel L. Everett 2005. Cultural Constraints on Grammar and Cognition in Pirahã: Another look at the design features of human language. Current Anthropology 46(4): 621–46.

David Gil . 2005. Word Order Without Syntactic Categories: How Riau Indonesian does it. In Verb First: On the Syntax of Verb-Initial Languages, ed. Andrew Carnie , Heidi Harley , and Sheila Ann Dooley , 243–64. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Talmy Givón . 2001. Syntax. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Martin Haspelmath . 2010. Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories: Consequences for language description and typology. Language 86: 663–87.

John A. Hawkins 2004. Efficiency and Complexity in Grammars. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Bernd Heine . 2008. Contact-Induced Word Order Change Without Word Order Change. In Language Contact and Contact Languages, ed. Peter Siemund and Noemi Kintana , 33–60. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Bernd Heine , and Tania Kuteva . 2006. The Changing Languages of Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Larry M. Hyman 2011. Does Gokana Really Have No Syllables? Or: what’s so great about being universal? Phonology 28: 55–85.

Ray Jackendoff . 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Fred Karlsson . 2010. Syntactic Recursion and Iteration. In Harry van der Hulst (ed.), Recursion and Human Language, 43–67. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Stephen C. Levinson 2001. Yélî Dnye and the Theory of Basic Color Terms. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 10. 3–55.

Stephen C. Levinson 2012. The Original Sin of Cognitive Science. Topics in Cognitive Science 4: 1–8.

Marianne Mithun . 1984. How to Avoid Subordination. In Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 493–509.

Andrew Nevins , David Pesetsky , and Cilene Rodrigues . 2009. Pirahã Exceptionality: A reassessment. Language 85: 355–404.

Frederick J. Newmeyer 2010. On Comparative Concepts and Descriptive Categories: A reply to Haspelmath. Language 86: 688–95.

Amy Perfors , Joshua B. Tenenbaum , and Terry Regier . 2011. The Learnability of Abstract Syntactic Principles. Cognition 118: 306–38.

Frans Plank , and Elena Filimonova . 2000. The Universals Archive: A brief introduction to prospective users. Language Typology and Universals 53: 109–23.

Geoffrey K. Pullum , and Barbara C. Scholz . 2010. Recursion and the Infinitude Claim. In Recursion and Human Language, ed. Harry van der Hulst , 113–37. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Terry Regier , Paul Kay , and Naveen Khetarpal . 2007. Color Naming Reflects Optimal Partitions of Color Space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104: 1436–41.

Debi Roberson . 2005. Color Categories are Culturally Diverse in Cognition As Well As in Language. Cross-cultural Research 39: 56–71.

Debi Roberson , Jules Davidoff , and Ian Davies . 2000. Color Categories are Not Universal: Replications and new evidence from a stone-age culture. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 129: 369–398.

Wendy Sandler , Mark Aronoff , Irit Meir , and Carol Padden . 2011. The Gradual Emergence of Phonological Form in a New Language. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 29: 503–43.

René Schiering , Balthasar Bickel , and Kristine Hildebrandt . 2010. The Prosodic Word Is Not Universal, But Emergent. Journal of Linguistics 46: 657–709.

Timothy Shopen , ed. 2007. Language Typology and Syntactic Description. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Irene Vogel . 2009. Universals of Prosodic Structure. In Universals of Language Today, ed. Sergio Scalise , Elisabetta Magni , and Antonietta Bisetto , 59–82. Berlin: Springer.

Richard Bauman , and Charles L. Briggs . 2003. Voices of Modernity: Language Ideologies and the Politics of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Allan Bell . 1984. Language Style as Audience Design. Language in Society 13(2): 145–204.

Roger Brown , and Marguerite Ford . 1961. Address in American English. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 62(2): 375–85.

Penelope Eckert . 2012. Three Waves of Variation Study: The emergence of meaning in the study of sociolinguistic variation. Annual Review of Anthropology 41: 87–100.

Miyako Inoue . 2006. Standardization. In Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed., ed. Keith Brown , 12.121–7. Oxford: Elsevier.

Paul Kay , and Chad K. McDaniel . 1978. The Linguistic Significance of the Meanings of Basic Color Terms. Language 54(3): 610–46.

Michael Losonsky . 2006. Linguistic Turns in Modern Philosophy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

John A. Lucy , 1997. The Linguistics of ‘Color’. In Color Categories in Thought and Language, ed. C. L. Hardin and Luisa Maffi , 320–46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

John Lyons . 1977. Semantics. 2 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

John Lyons . 1995. Linguistic Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Yakov Malkiel . 1959. Studies in Irreversible Binomials. Lingua 8(2): 113–60.

Charles Morris . 1946. Signs, Language, and Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Gregory L. Murphy 1988. Personal Reference in English. Language in Society 17(3): 317–49.

Hilary Putnam . 1975. The Meaning of ‘Meaning’. In Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2: Mind, Language, and Reality, 215–71. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Punya Sloka Ray . 1968 [1962]. Language Standardization. In Readings in the Sociology of Language, ed. Joshua A. Fishman , 754–65. The Hague and Paris: Mouton.

Michelle Z. Rosaldo 1982. The Things We Do With Words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. Language in Society 11(2): 203–37.

Emanuel A. Schegloff 2007. Sequence Organization in Interaction. Vol. 1 of A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Michael Silverstein . 2010. ‘Direct’ and ‘Indirect’ Communicative Acts in Semiotic Perspective. Journal of Pragmatics 42(2): 337–53

Michael Silverstein . 2012. Does the Autonomy of Linguistics Rest on the Autonomy of Syntax? An alternative framing of our object of study. In Pragmaticizing Understanding: Festschrift for Jef Verschueren, ed. Michael Meeuwis and Jan-Ola Östman , 15–38. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Peter Auer . 2009a. On-Line Syntax: Thoughts on the temporality of spoken language. Language Sciences 31: 1–13.

Peter Auer . 2009b. Projection and Minimalistic Syntax in Interaction. Discourse Processes 46(2–3): 180–205.

Peter Auer , and Stefan Pfänder , eds. 2011. Constructions: Emerging and Emergent. Berlin: De Gruyter.

Dagmar Barth-Weingarten , Elisabeth Reber , and Margret Selting . 2010. Prosody in Interaction. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Clay Beckner , and Joan Bybee . 2009. A Usage-Based Account of Constituency and Reanalysis. Language Learning 59: 27–46.

Dwight L. Bolinger 1952. Linear Modification. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America 67: 1117–44.

Joan Bybee . 1985. Morphology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Joan Bybee . 2001a. Phonology and Language Use. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Joan Bybee . 2002. Sequentiality as the Basis of Constituent Structure. In The Evolution of Language from Pre-Language, ed. T. Givon and Bertram Malle , 109–32. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Joan Bybee . 2006. From Usage to Grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82(4): 711–33.

Joan Bybee . 2007. Frequency of Use and the Organization of Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Joan Bybee . 2010. Language, Usage and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Joan Bybee , and Paul J. Hopper , eds. 2001. Frequency and the Emergence of Linguistic Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Joan Bybee , and Joanne Scheibman . 1999. The Effect of Usage on Degrees of Constituency: The reduction of don’t in English. Linguistics 37(3): 575–96.

Herbert H. Clark , and M. Van Der Wege . 2002. Psycholinguistics. In Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, ed. D. L. Medin , 3rd ed., 209–59. New York: John Wiley.

Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen , and Cecilia E. Ford , eds. 2004. Sound Patterns in Interaction: Cross-linguistic Studies from Conversation. Studies in Linguistic Typology. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen , and Margret Selting , eds. 1996. Prosody in Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen , and Sandra A. Thompson . 2008. On Assessing Situations and Events in Conversation: Extraposition and its relatives. Discourse Studies 10(4): 443–67.

Colette Craig , ed. 1986. Noun Classes and Categorization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Susanna Cumming , Tsuyoshi Ono , and Ritva Laury . 2011. Discourse, Grammar and Interaction. In Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction, ed. Teun A. Van Dijk , 2nd ed., 8–36. London: Sage Publications.

Anne Cutler . 1983. Speaker’s Conceptions of the Functions of Prosody. In Prosody: Models and measurements, ed. Anne Cutler and D. R. Ladd , 79–91. Heidelberg: Springer.

R. M. W. Dixon 1977. A Grammar of Yidiny. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

R. M. W. Dixon 1979. Ergativity. Language 55(1): 59–138.

Matthew Dryer . 1986. Primary Objects, Secondary Objects, and Antidative. Language 62(4): 808–45.

Matthew Dryer . 1988. Object-Verb Order and Adjective-Noun Order: Dispelling a myth. Lingua 74: 185–217.

Charles Fillmore , Paul Kay , and Catherine O’Connor . 1988. Regularity and Idiomaticity in Grammatical Constructions: The Case of let alone. Language 64: 501–38.

Jan Firbas . 1992. Functional Sentence Perspective in Written and Spoken Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barbara A. Fox , Sandra A. Thompson , Cecilia E. Ford , and Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen . 2012. Conversation Analysis and Linguistics. In Handbook of Conversation Analysis, ed. Jack Sidnell and Tanya Stivers , 726–40. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

Stefan L. Frank , Rens Bod , and Morten H. Christiansen . 2012. How Hierarchical is Language Use? Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 279: 4522–31. http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/279/1747/4522.full.pdf+html

John Haiman . 1983. Iconic and Economic Motivation. Language 59(4): 781–819.

John Haiman . ed. 1985a. Iconicity in Syntax. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

John Haiman . 1994. Ritualization and the Development of Language. In Perspectives on Grammaticalization, ed. William Pagliuca , 3–28. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Auli Hakulinen , and Margret Selting , eds. 2005. Syntax and Lexis in Conversation. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

M. A. K. Halliday 1967–68. Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English. Journal of Linguistics 3(1) [1967]: 37–82; 3(2) [1967]: 199–244; 4(2) [1968]: 179–215.

Bernd Heine , and Tania Kuteva . 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marja-Liisa Helasvuo . 2003. Emergent Grammar. In Handbook of Pragmatics, ed. Chris Bulcaen , Jef Verschueren , and Jan-Ola Östman (online). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

Paul Hopper 1987. Emergent Grammar. Berkeley Linguistics Society 13: 139–57.

Paul Hopper 1992. Times of the Sign: On temporality in recent linguistics. Time and Society 1(2): 223–38.

Paul Hopper 2011a. Emergent Grammar and Temporality in Interactional Linguistics. In Constructions: Emerging and Emergent, ed. P. Auer and S. Pfänder , 22–44. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Paul Hopper , and Sandra A. Thompson . 1980. Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language 56: 251–99.

Paul Hopper , and Sandra A. Thompson . 2008. Projectability and Clause Combining in Interaction. In Crosslinguistic Studies of Clause Combining: The Multifunctionality of Conjunctions, ed. Ritva Laury , 99–124. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Ritva Laury . 2012. Syntactically Non-Integrated Finnish ‘jos’ (if)-conditional Clauses as Directives. Discourse Processes 49: 213–42.

Bjorn Lindblom , Peter MacNeilage , and Michael Studdert-Kennedy . 1984. Self-organizing Processes and the Explanation of Phonological Universals. In Explanations for Language Universals, ed. B. Butterworth , B. Comrie , and O. Dahl , 181–203. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Per Linell . 2005. The Written Language Bias in Linguistics: Its Nature, Origins and Transformations. London: Routledge.

John Local , and John Kelly . 1986. Projection and “Silences”: Notes on phonetic and conversational structure. Human Studies 9: 185–204.

Lorenza Mondada . 2006. Participants’ Online Analysis and Multimodal Practices: Projecting the end of the turn and the closing of the sequence. Discourse Studies 8(1): 117–29.

Emanuel A. Schegloff 1996. Turn Organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In Interaction and Grammar, ed. Elinor Ochs , Emanuel Schegloff , and Sandra A. Thompson , 52–133. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tanya Stivers . 2008. Stance, Alignment, and Affiliation during Storytelling: When nodding is a token of affiliation. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 41(1): 31–57.

Elizabeth Closs Traugott , and Bernd Heine , eds. 1991a. Approaches to Grammaticalization, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Gareth Walker . 2004. On Some Interactional and Phonetic Properties of Increments to Turns in Talk-in-interaction. In Sound Patterns in Interaction, ed. Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Cecilia E. Ford , 147–69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Rulon S. Wells 1947. Immediate Constituents. Language 23: 81–117.

Ludwig Wittgenstein . 1976. Cause and Effect. Philosophia 6 (3–4): 409–25.

N. Akhtar , J. Jipso , and M. A. Callanan . 2001. Learning Words through Overhearing. Child Development 72(2): 416–30.

S. E. M. Allen 1996. Aspects of Argument Structure Acquisition in Inuktitut. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

S. E. M. Allen , and M. Crago . 1996. Early Passive Acquisition in Inuktitut. Journal of Child Language 23: 129–55.

S. E. M. Allen , and H. Schroder . 2003. Preferred Argument Structure in Early Inuktitut Spontaneous Speech Data. In Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function, ed. J. W. Du Bois , L. E. Kumpf , and W. J. Ashby , 301–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

B. Ambridge , and E. V. M. Lieven . 2011. Child Language Acquisition: Contrasting Theoretical Approaches. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

E. Bavin ed. 2009. The Cambridge Handbook of Child Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.

E. Bavin , and S. Stoll , eds. 2013. Acquisition of Ergative Structures. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

H. Behrens 2009. Usage-based and Emergentist Approaches to Language Acquisition. Linguistics 47(2): 383–411.

J. Blake 2000. Routes to Child Language: Evolutionary and Developmental Precursors. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

M. H. Bornstein , L. R. Cote , S. Maital , K. Painter , S-Y. Park , L. Pascual , M.-G. Pecheux , J. Ruel , P. Venute , and A. Vyt . 2004. Cross-linguistic Analysis of Vocabulary in Young Children: Spanish, Dutch, French, Hebrew, Italian, Korean, and American English. Child Development 75(4): 1115–39.

M. Bowerman 1990. Mapping Thematic Roles onto Syntactic Functions: Are children helped by innate linking rules? Linguistics 28: 1253–90.

M. Bowerman , and S. Choi . 2001. Shaping Meanings for Language: Universal and language specific in the acquisition of spatial semantic categories. In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, ed. M. Bowerman and S. C. Levinson , 475–511. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

P. Brown 1998a. Children’s First Verbs in Tzeltal: Evidence for an early verb category. Linguistics 36(4): 713–53.

P. Brown 1998b. Conversational Structure and Language Acquisition: The role of repetition in Tzeltal adult and child speech. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 8(2): 197–221.

P. Brown 2007. Culture-specific Influences on Semantic Development: Acquiring the Tzeltal ‘benefactive’ construction. In Learning Indigenous Languages: Child Language Acquisition in Mesoamerica, ed. B. B. Pfeiler , 119–54. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

P. Brown , B. Pfeiler , L. de León , and C. Pye . 2013. The Acquisition of Agreement in Four Mayan Languages. In The Acquisition of Ergativity, ed. E. L. Bavin and S. Stoll , 271–306. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

R. Brown 1973. A First Language: The Early Stages. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

M. Callanan , and L. Oakes . 1992. Preschoolers Questions and Parents’ Explanations: Causal thinking in everyday activity. Cognitive Development 7: 213–33.

M Carpenter , K. Nagell , and M. Tomasello . 1998. Social Cognition, Joint Attention, and Communicative Competence from 9 to 15 Months of Age. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 63 (4, Serial No. 255).

N. Chater , and M. H. Christiansen . 2010. Language Acquisition Meets Language Evolution. Cognitive Science 34: 1131–57.

P. Chavajay , and B. Rogoff . 1999. Cultural Variation in Management of Attention by Children and their Caregivers. Developmental Psychology 35(4): 1079–90.

S. Choi , and M. Bowerman . 1991. Learning to Express Motion Events in English and Korean – The influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition 41: 83–121.

S. Choi , and A. Gopnik . 1995. Early Acquisition of Verbs in Korean: A cross-linguistic study. Journal of Child Language 22(3): 497–529.

S. Choi , L. McDonough , M. Bowerman , and J. M. Mandler . 1999. Early Sensitivity to Language-specific Spatial Categories in English and Korean. Cognitive Development 14: 241–68.

P. Clancy 2003. The Lexicon in Interaction: Developmental origins of Preferred Argument Structure in Korean. In Preferred Argument Structure: Grammar as Architecture for Function, ed. J. W. Du Bois , L. E. Kumpf , and W. J. Ashby , 81–108. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

C. D. Clark 2010. In a Younger Voice: Doing Child-Centered Qualitative Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

E. V. Clark 2012. Children, Conversation, and Acquisition. In Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics, ed. M. Spivey , K. McRae , and M. Joanisse , 573–88. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

W. A. Corsaro 1992. Interpretive Reproduction in Children’s Peer Cultures. Social Psychology Quarterly 55: 160–77.

W. A. Corsaro , L. Molinary , and K. Brown Rosier . 2002. Zena and Carlotta: Transition narratives and early education in the United States and Italy. Human Development 45: 323–48.

K. Demuth 1998. Argument Structure and the Acquisition of Sesotho Applicatives. Linguistics 36(4): 781–806.

K. Demuth , F. Moloi , and M. Machebane . 2010. 3-yr.-olds Comprehension, Production, and Generalization of Sesotho Passives. Cognition 115: 238–251.

A. Duranti , E. Ochs , and B. Schieffelin , eds. 2011. The Handbook of Language Socialization. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.

N. Evans , and S. C. Levinson . 2009. The Myth of Language Universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 32(5): 429–92.

A. Filipi 2009. Toddler and Parent Interaction: The Organisation of Gaze, Pointing and Vocalisation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

C. Fisher , and L. Gleitman . 2002. Language Acquisition. In Stevens’ Handbook of Experimental Psychology, Vol 1: Learning and Motivation, ed. C. R. Gallistel , 445–96. New York: Wiley.

P. B. Garrett , and P. Baquedano-Lopez . 2002. Language Socialization: Reproduction and continuity, transformation and change. Annual Review of Anthropology 31: 339–61.

D. Gentner , and L. Boroditsky . 2001. Individuation, Relativity and Early Word Learning. In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, ed. M. Bowerman and S. Levinson , 215–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

A. Giddens 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure, and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

L. Gleitman 1990. The Structural Source of Verb Meanings. Language Acquisition 1: 3–55.

M. Goodwin 2006. The Hidden Life of Girls: Games of Stance, Status, and Exclusion. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

S. Harkness , P. O. Zylicz , C. M. Super , B. Welles-Nyström , M. R. Bermúdez , S. Bonichini , U. Moscardino , and C. J. Mavridis . 2011. Children’s Activities and their Meanings for Parents: A mixed-methods study in six Western cultures. Journal of Family Psychology 25(6): 799–813.

E. Hoff 2003. The Specificity of Environmental Influence: Socioeconomic status affects early vocabulary development via maternal speech. Child Development 74(5): 1368–78.

J. Huttenlocher , W. Haight , A. Bryk , M. Seltzer , and T. Lyons . 1991. Vocabulary Growth: Relation to language input and gender. Developmental Psychology 27: 236–48.

J. Huttenlocher , H. Waterfall , M. Vasilyeva , J. Vevea , and L. V. Hedges . 2010. Sources of Variability in Children’s Language Growth. Cognitive Psychology 61(4): 343–65.

S. Kita 2009. Cross-cultural Variation of Speech-accompanying Gesture: A review. Language and Cognitive Processes 24(2): 145–67.

J. Lave , and E. Wenger . 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: University of Cambridge Press.

L. León . 1998. The Emergent Participant. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 8(2): 131–61.

L. León . 2011. Language Socialization and Multiparty Participation Frameworks. In Handbook of Language Socialization, ed. A. Duranti , E. Ochs , and B. B Schieffelin , 81–111. Oxford: Blackwells.

R. LeVine , S. Dixon , S. LeVine , A. L. Richman , P. H. Leiderman , C. H. Keefer , and T. B. Brazelton . 1994. Child Care and Culture: Lessons from Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

S. C. Levinson 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

E. V. M. Lieven 1994. Crosslinguistic and Crosscultural Aspects of Language Addressed to Children. In Input and Interaction in Language Acquisition, ed. C. Gallaway and B. J. Richards , 56–72. New York: Cambridge University Press.

U. Liszkowski , P. Brown , T. Callaghan , A. Takada , and C. de Vos . 2012. A Prelinguistic Universal of Human Communication. Cognitive Science 36: 698–713.

J. Lucy 1992b. Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

J. Lucy 1997. Linguistic Relativity. Annual Review of Anthropology 26: 291–312.

J. Lucy , and S. Gaskins 2001. Grammatical Categories and the Development of Classification Preferences: A comparative approach. In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, ed. M. Bowerman and S. C. Levinson , 257–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

B. Lust 2006. Child Language: Acquisition and Growth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

M. P. Maratsos 2007. Commentary. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 72 (286): 121–6.

N. Masataka 2003. The Onset of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

H. Mehan 1979. Learning Lessons: Social Organization in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

R. H. Munroe , R. L. Munroe , and H. S. Shimmin . 1984. Children’s Work in Four Cultures: Determinants and Consequences. American Anthropologist 86(2): 369–79.

B. Narasimhan 2005. Splitting the Notion of “Agent”: Case-Marking in early child Hindi. Journal of Child Language 32(4): 787–803.

B. Narasimhan , N. Budwig , and L. Murty . 2005. Argument Realization in Hindi Caregiver–Child Discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 37(4): 461–95.

E. Ochs , and B. B. Schieffelin , 2008. Language Socialization: An historical overview. In Language Socialization, Vol. 8: Encyclopedia of Language and Education, ed. P. Duff and N. Hornberger , 2nd ed., 3–15. New York: Springer.

H. L. Odden 2011. The Impact of Primary Schools on the Differential Distribution of Samoan Adolescents’ Competence with Honorific Language. Current Anthropology 52(4): 597–606.

B. Pfeiler , ed. 2007. Learning Indigenous Languages: Child Language Acquisition in Mesoamerica. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

C. Pontevorvo , A. Fasulo , and L. Sterponi . 2001. Mutual Apprentices: The making of parenthood and childhood in family dinner conversations. Human Development 44(6): 340–61.

C. Pye 1986. Quiche Mayan Speech to Children. J. Child Lang. 13: 85–100.

C. Pye 1990. The Acquisition of Ergative Languages. Linguistics 28: 1291–1330.

C. Pye , B. Pfeiler , L. de León , P. Brown , and P. Mateo . 2007. Roots or Edges? Explaining variation in children’s early verb forms across five Mayan languages. In Learning Indigenous Languages: Child Language Acquisition in Mesoamerica, ed. B. B. Pfeiler , 15–46. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

J. F. Reynolds 2008. Socializing Puros Pericos (Little Parrots): The negotiation of respect and responsibility in Antonero Mayan sibling and peer networks. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 18(1): 82–107.

B. Rogoff , R. Paradise , R. Mejía-Arauz , M. Correa-Chávez , and C. Angelillo . 2003. Firsthand Learning through Intent Participation. Annual Review of Psychology 54(1): 175–203.

F. Rossano , P. Brown , and S. C. Levinson . 2009. Gaze, Questioning, and Culture. In Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives, ed. J. Sidnell , 187–249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

A. Rumsey , L. San Roque , and B. B. Schieffelin . 2013. The Acquisition of Ergative Marking in Kaluli, Ku Waru and Duna (Trans New Guinea). In The Acquisition of Ergativity, ed. E. L. Bavin and S. Stoll , 133–82. Amsterdam: Benjamins.

B. R. Rymes 2008. Language Socialization and the Linguistic Anthropology of Education. In Encyclopedia of Language and Education, ed. P. Duff and N. Hornberger , 2nd revised ed., Vol. 8, 29–42. New York: Springer.

B. B. Schieffelin , and E. Ochs . 1986a. Language Socialization. Annual Review of Anthropology 15: 163–91.

L. Schneidman , and S. Goldin-Meadow . 2012. Language Input and Acquisition in a Mayan Village: How important is directed speech? Developmental Science 15(5): 659–73.

J. Sidnell 2009. Conversation Analysis: An Introduction. New York: Wiley.

D. I. Slobin 2001. Form-Function Relations: How do children find out what they are? In Language Acquisition and Conceptual Development, ed. M. Bowerman and S. C. Levinson , 406–49. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

D. I. Slobin , and M. Bowerman . 2007. Interfaces Between Linguistic Typology and Child Language Research. Linguistic Typology 11: 213–26.

L. L. Sperry , and D. E. Sperry . 1996. Early Development of Narrative Skills. Cognitive Development 11: 443–65.

T. Stivers , N. J. Enfield , P. Brown , C. Englert , M. Hayashi , T. Heinemann , G. Hoymann , F. Rossano , J.-P. de Ruiter , K.-E. Yoon , and S. C. Levinson . 2009. Universals and Cultural Variation in Turn-taking in Conversation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 10587–92.

S. Stoll 2009. Crosslinguistic Approaches to Language Acquisition. In The Handbook of Child Language, ed. E. L. Bavin , 89–104. New York: Cambridge University Press.

S. Stoll , B. Bickel , E. Lieven , G. Banjade , T. N Bhatta , M. Gaenszle , N. P. Paudyal , J. Pettigrew , I. P. Rai , M. Rai , and N. K. Rai . 2012. Nouns and Verbs in Chintang: Children’s usage and surrounding adult speech. Journal of Child Language 39(2): 284–321.

S. Strömqvist , H. Ragnarsdóttir , K. Toivainen , et al. 1995. The Inter-Nordic Study of Language Acquisition. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 18: 3–29.

T. Tardif 1996. Nouns are Not Always Learned Before Verbs: Evidence from Mandarin speakers’ early vocabularies. Developmental Psychology 32(3): 492–504.

T. Tardif , P. Fletcher , W. Liang , Z. Zhang , N. Kaciroti , and V. A. Marchman . 2008. Baby’s First 10 Words. Developmental Psychology 44(4): 929–38.

K. A. Watson-Gegeo and S. E. Nielsen . 2003. Language Socialization in SLA. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition, ed. C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long , 155–77. New York: Basil Blackwell.

B. B. Whiting , and J. W. M. Whiting . 1975. Children of Six Cultures: A Psycho-Cultural Analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

A. J. Wootton 1997. Interaction and the Development of Mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nadia Abu El Haj . 2002. Facts on the Ground: Archaeological Practice and Territorial Self-Fashioning in Israeli Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Asif Agha . 2011. Meet Mediatization. Language and Communication 31(3): 163–70.

Niko Besnier . 1995. Literacy, Emotion, and Authority: Reading and Writing on a Polynesian Atoll. Studies in the Social and Cultural Foundations of Language 16. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Joe Blythe . 2013. Preference Organization Driving Structuration: Evidence from Australian Aboriginal interaction for pragmatically motivated grammaticalization. Language 89(4): 883–919.

Lyle Campbell , and Terrence Kaufman . 1976. A Linguistic Look at the Olmec. American Antiquity 41(1): 80–9.

Lyle Campbell , and Richard Janda . 2000. Introduction: conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems. Language Sciences 23(2–3): 93–112.

John F. Chuchiak 2010. Writing as Resistance: Maya Graphic Pluralism and Indigenous Elite Strategies for Survival in Colonial Yucatán 1550–1750. Ethnohistory 57(1): 87–116.

Zoe Crossland . 2009. Of Clues and Signs: The dead body and its evidential traces. American Anthropologist 111(1):69–80.

H. P. Dick 2010. Imagined Lives and Modernist Chronotopes in Mexican Nonmigrant Discourse. American Ethnologist 37: 275–90.

Alan Durston . 2008. Native-Language Literacy in Colonial Peru: The question of mundane Quechua writing revisited. Hispanic American Historical Review 88(1): 41–70.

Nicholas Evans . 2003. Context, Culture, and Structuration in the Languages of Australia. Annual Review of Anthropology 32: 13–40.

Nancy M. Farriss 1987. Remembering the Future, Anticipating the Past: History, Time, and Cosmology among the Maya of Yucatan. Comparative Studies in Society and History 29: 566–93.

Paja Faudree . 2012. Performativity and the Temporal Pragmatics of Power: Speech acts of the conquest. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 22(3): 182–200.

Paja Faudree . 2013. Singing for the Dead: The Politics of Indigenous Revival in Mexico. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Alice C. Harris , and Lyle Campbell . 1995. Historical Syntax in Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jane H. Hill 2001. Proto-Uto-Aztecan: A Community of Cultivators in Central Mexico? American Anthropologist 103(4): 913–34.

Jane H. Hill 2005. Intertextuality as Source and Evidence for Indirect Indexical Meanings. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15: 113–24.

M. Inoue 2004. Introduction: Temporality and Historicity in and through Linguistic Ideology. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14: 1–5.

Judith T. Irvine 2004. Say When: Temporalities in language ideology. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14: 99–109.

Maarten Jansen . 1990. The Search for History in Mixtec Codices. Ancient Mesoamerica 1: 99–112.

Terrence Kaufman , and John Justeson . 2009. Historical linguistics and pre-columbian Mesoamerica. Ancient Mesoamerica 20(2): 221–31.

Paul Kockelman , and A. Bernstein . 2012. Semiotic Technologies, Temporal Reckoning, and the Portability of Meaning, Or: Modern modes of temporality – just how abstract are they? Anthropological Theory 12(3): 320–48.

Michael Lempert . 2007. Conspicuously Past: Distressed discourse and diagrammatic embedding in a Tibetan represented speech style. Language and Communication 27(3): 258–71.

Michael Lempert , and Sabina Perrino . 2007. Entextualization and the ends of temporality. Language and Communication 27(3): 205–11.

James Lockhart . 2007. Introduction: Background and Course of the New Philology. In Sources and Methods for the Study of Postconquest Mesoamerican Ethnohistory, Provisional Version (e-book), ed. James Lockhart , Stephanie Wood , and Lisa Sousa . Eugene, OR: Wired Humanities Project, University of Oregon, 2007. Expanded in 2010. Accessed at http://whp.uoregon.edu/Lockhart/index.html on April 19, 2012.

Ekkehart Malotki . 1983. Hopi Time: A Linguistic Analysis of the Temporal Concepts in the Hopi Language. Berlin: Mouton.

Leila Monaghan . 2011. Expanding Boundaries of Linguistic Anthropology: 2010 in perspective. American Anthropologist 113(2): 222–34.

Richard J. Parmentier 2007. It’s About Time: On the semiotics of temporality. Language and Communication 27(3): 272–7.

Sabina Perrino . 2007. Cross-Chronotope Alignment in Senegalese Oral Narrative. Language and Communication 27(3): 227–44.

Sabina Perrino . 2011. Chronotopes of Story and Storytelling Event in Interviews. Language in Society 40(1): 91–103.

Robert Preucel . 2006. Archaeological Semiotics. Oxford: Blackwell Press.

J. Rappaport , and T. Cummins . 2011. Beyond the Lettered City: Indigenous Literacies in the Andes. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Matthew Restall . 1997a. Heirs to the Hieroglyphics: Indigenous writing in Colonial Mesoamerica. The Americas 54(2): 239–67.

Matthew Restall . 2003. A History of the New Philology and the New Philology in History. Latin American Historical Review 38: 113–34.

Frank Salomon 2001. How an Andean “Writing Without Words” Works. Current Anthropology 42(1): 1–27.

Frank Salomon 2004. The Cord Keepers: Khipus and Cultural Life in a Peruvian Village. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

Edward Sapir . 1916. Time Perspective in Aboriginal American Culture: A Study in Method. Canada Department of Mines, Geological Survey, Memoir 90. Anthropological Series, No. 13.

Debora Schiffrin . 2009. Crossing Boundaries: The nexus of time, space, person, and place in narrative. Language in Society 38: 421–45

Michael Silverstein . 1993. Metapragmatic Discourse and Metapragmatic Function. In Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics, ed. J. Lucy , 33–58. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Michael Silverstein . 2005. Axes of Evals. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 15: 6–22.

Rupert Stasch . 2011. Textual Iconicity and the Primitivist Cosmos: Chronotopes of desire in travel writing about Korowai of West Papua. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 21: 1–21.

Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak . 1988. Can the Subaltern Speak? In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, ed. Cary Nelson and Lawrence Grossberg , 271–313. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Peter Trudgill . 2010. Investigations in Sociohistorical Linguistics: Stories of Colonization and Contact. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kevin Tuite . 2006. Interpreting Language Variation and Change. In Language, Culture and Society: Key Topics in Linguistic Anthropology, ed. Christine Jourdan and Kevin Tuite , 229–56. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ruth M. Van Dyke , and Susan E. Alcock , eds. 2003. Archaeologies of Memory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Eric Van Young . 2004. Two Decades of Anglophone Historical Writing on Colonial Mexico: Continuity and change since 1980. Mexican Studies/Estudios Mexicanos 20(2): 275–326.

Kristina Wirtz . 2007. Enregistered Memory and Afro-Cuban Historicity in Santería’s Ritual Speech. Language and Communication 27(3): 245–57.

K. A. Woolard 2004. Is the Past a Foreign Country?: Time, language origins, and the nation in early modern Spain. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 14: 57–80.

K. A. Woolard 2008. Why Dat Now? Linguistic-anthropological contributions to the explanation of sociolinguistic icons and change. Journal of Sociolinguistics 12(4): 432–52.

Y. Yannakakis 2008. The Art of Being In-Between: Native Intermediaries, Indian Identity, and Local Rule in Colonial Oaxaca. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

M. Arbib 2012. How the Brain got Language. New York: Oxford University Press.

M. Aronoff , I. Meir , and W. Sandler . 2005. The Paradox of Sign Language Morphology. Language 81(2): 301–44.

H. Clark , and D. Wilkes-Gibbs . 1986. Referring as a Collaborative Process. Cognition 22: 1–39.

S. Dachkovsky , C. Healy , and W. Sandler . 2013. Visual intonation in two sign languages. Phonology 30(2): 211–52.

S. Dachkovsky , and W. Sandler (2009). Visual Intonation in the Prosody of a Sign Language. Language and Speech 52: 287–314.

B. de Boer , W. Sandler , and S. Kirby , eds. 2012. New Perspectives on Duality of Patterning: Introduction to the special issue. Language and Cognition 4(4): 251–9.

J. W. Du Bois 1987. The Discourse Basis of Ergativity. Language 63: 805–55.

S. Goldin-Meadow , and H. Feldman . 1977. The Development of Language-like Communication Without a Language Model. Science 197(4301): 401–03.

A. Israel , and W. Sandler . 2011. Phonological Category Resolution in a New Sign Language: A comparative study of handshapes. In Formational Units in Sign Languages, ed. R. Channon , and H. v.d. Hulst , 177–202. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

R. Jackendoff 1999. Possible Stages in the Evolution of the Language Capacity. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(7): 272–9.

S. Kisch 2008. The Social Construction of Deafness in a Bedouin Community in the Negev. Medical Anthropology 27(3): 283–313.

S. Kisch (2012). Demarcating Generations of Signers in the Dynamic Sociolinguistic Landscape of a Shared Sign Language: The case of Al-Sayyid. In Sign Languages in Village Communities, ed. U. Zeshan and C. De Vos , 127–52. Berlin: Mouton; Nijmegen: Ishara Press.

S. Lanesman , and I. Meir . 2012. The Survival of Algerian Jewish Sign Language alongside Israeli Sign Language in Israel. In: Sign Languages in Village Communities, ed. U. Zeshan and C. De Vos , 153–180. Berlin: Mouton; Nijmegen: Ishara Press.

S. Liddell , and R. E. Johnson . 1986. American Sign Language Compound Formation Processes, Lexicalization, and Phonological Remnants. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 4: 445–513.

I. Meir 2002. A Cross-Modality Perspective on Verb Agreement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20(2): 413–50.

I. Meir 2010. The Emergence of Argument Structure in Two New Sign Languages. In Syntax, Lexical Semantics and Event Structure, ed. M. R. Hovav , E. Doron , and I. Sichel , 101–23. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

I. Meir , A. Israel , W. Sandler , C. Padden , and M. Aronoff . 2012. The Influence of Community on Language Structure: Evidence from two young sign languages. Linguistic Variation 12(2): 247–91.

I. Meir , C. Padden , M. Aronoff , and W. Sandler . 2007. Body as Subject. Journal of Linguistics 43: 531–63.

I. Meir , C. Padden , M. Aronoff , and W. Sandler . 2013. Competing Iconicities in the Structure of Languages. Cognitive Linguistics 24(2): 309–43.

M. Nespor , and W. Sandler . 1999. Prosody in Israeli Sign Language. Language and Speech 42(2&3): 143–76.

E. Newport 1990. Maturational Constraints on Language Learning. Cognitive Science 14: 11–28.

C. Padden , I. Meir , M. Aronoff , and W. Sandler . 2010a. The Grammar of Space in Two New Sign Languages. In Sign Languages: A Cambridge Language Survey, ed. D. Brentari , 570–90. New York: Cambridge University Press.

I. Plag 2006. Morphology in Pidgins and Creoles. In The Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, ed. K. Brown , 305–8. Oxford: Elsevier.

W. Sandler 1989. Phonological Representation of the Sign. Dordrecht: Foris.

W. Sandler 1993. Sign Language and Modularity. Lingua 89(4): 315–51.

W. Sandler 2011. Prosody and Syntax in Sign Language. Transactions of the Philological Society 108(3): 298–328.

W. Sandler 2012a. Visual Prosody. In Sign Language: An International Handbook, ed. R. Pfau , M. Steinbach , and B. Woll , 55–76. Berlin: De Gruyter.

W. Sandler 2012b. The Phonological Organization of Sign Languages. Language and Linguistics Compass 6(3): 162–82.

W. Sandler 2012c. Dedicated Gestures and the Emergence of Sign Language. Gesture 12(3): 265–307.

W. Sandler , I. Meir , S. Dachkovsky , C. Padden , and M. Aronoff . 2011. The Emergence of Complexity in Prosody and Syntax. Lingua 121(13): 2014–33.

T. Supalla 1986. The Classifier System in American Sign Language. In Noun Classification and Categorization, ed. C. Craig , 181–214. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

U. Zeshan 2004. Interrogative Constructions in Signed Languages: Cross-linguistic perspectives. Language 80(1): 7–39.

Peter Austin and Julia Sallabank . 2011b. Introduction. In The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages, ed. Peter K. Austin and Julia Sallabank , 1–24. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jim Cummins . 1979. Linguistic Interdependence and the Educational Development of Bilingual Children. Review of Educational Research 49: 221–51.

Jim Cummins . 1991. Interdependence of First- and Second Language Proficiency in Bilingual Children. In Language Processing in Bilingual Children, ed. Ellen Bialystok , 70–89. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lise M. Dobrin , and Josh Berson . 2011. Speakers and Language Documentation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Endangered Languages, ed. Peter K. Austin and Julia Sallabank , 187–211. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nancy C. Dorian 1989. Investigating Obsolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Nancy C. Dorian 2002. Commentary: Broadening the rhetorical and descriptive horizons in endangered-language linguistics. Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 12: 134–40.

Joseph Errington . 2003. Getting Language Rights: The rhetorics of language endangerment and loss. American Anthropologist 105(4): 723–32.

Nicholas Evans . 2001. The Last Speaker Is Dead – Long Live the Last Speaker! In Linguistic Fieldwork, ed. Paul Newman and Martha Ratliff , 250–81. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Joshua A. Fishman 2002. Commentary: What a Difference 40 years make! Journal of Linguistic Anthropology 12(2): 144–9.

Susan Gal .