The Institutionalisation of Philosophy in Continental Europe

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521867429.005

4 - The Institutionalisation of Philosophy in Continental Europe

from I - The Concept of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 March 2008

T. J. Hochstrasser

Edited by

Knud Haakonssen

Show author details

T. J. Hochstrasser: Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Knud Haakonssen: Affiliation:
University of Sussex

Book contents

Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Although the historiography of this subject is large, it is also remorselessly particularist in focus, rarely venturing beyond the study of individual institutions to discern broader national or European trends and developments. Any overview must therefore begin with a few cautionary and defensive words defining the limits to be placed on the meaning of institutionalised philosophy during this period. Next we shall consider some generalisations that are relevant to the teaching of philosophy across all the many and varied European institutions of learning where it was officially taught. Then we shall examine separately the phenomenon of the learned academy as it matured in this era. Finally, some brief but more detailed remarks will be offered on developments in France and Germany. These countries are chosen partly for their intellectual and geopolitical dominance but also because they illustrate respectively the two contrasting patterns of change that philosophy experienced as a discipline. In France, philosophy is subdivided and taught as a series of new specialisms whereas in Germany, its remit is substantially extended from an introductory to the foundational role. This division is symbolised at the end of the period by the respective dominance of two differing concepts of institutionalised philosophy that in France owed much to Condillac and in Germany to Kant.

The most obvious difficulty we have is how broadly to interpret the category of philosophy itself: a minimalist approach would restrict coverage to those courses at universities and colleges that are explicitly designated as philosophical according to the eighteenth century’s own subdivision of the subject, but at the other end of the spectrum it may equally be argued that this investigation should comprehend those subdivisions of the discipline that are recognised today irrespective of the faculty or course where they were taught and located in the eighteenth century.

Information

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of Eighteenth-Century Philosophy , pp. 69 - 96

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521867429.005 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baumgart, Peter. “Karl Abraham Freiherr von Zedlitz”, in Berlinische Lebensbilder. Wissenschafts-politik in Berlin, ed. Ribbe, W.. Berlin, 1987.Google Scholar

Beales, Derek. “Social Forces and Enlightened Policies”, in Enlightened Absolutism: Reform and Reformers in Later Eighteenth Century Europe, ed. Scott, H. M.. London, 1990.Google Scholar

Blettermann, Petra. Die Universitätspolitik August des Starken 1694–1733.Cologne, 1990.

Briggs, Robin. “The Académie Royale des Sciences and the Pursuit of Utility”. Past and Present 131 (1991):.Google Scholar

Brockliss, L. W. B. “The European University in the Age of Revolution 1789–1850”, in The History of Oxford University, ed. Aston, T. H., 8 vols. Oxford, 1984–2000, vol. 6Google Scholar

Brockliss, L. W. B.French Higher Education in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries: A Cultural History.Oxford, 1987.

Chisick, Harvey. The Limits of Reform in the Enlightenment: Attitudes toward the Education of the Lower Classes in Eighteenth-Century France.Princeton, NJ, 1981.

Cochrane, Eric W.Tradition and Enlightenment in the Tuscan Academies 1690–1800.Chicago, IL, 1961.

Diderot, Denis, and d’Alembert, Jean Rond, eds. Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonné des sciences, des arts et des métiers, par une société de gens de lettres. 17 vols. Paris, 1751–65; 28 vols., Paris, 1751–72; 35 vols., Paris and Amsterdam, 1751–80 (facsim. 5 vols., New York, NY, 1969).

Dülmen, Richard. The Society of the Enlightenment: The Rise of the Middle Class and Enlightenment Culture in Germany, trans. Williams, A.. Cambridge, 1992.

Gres-Gayer, Jacques M.Théologie et pouvoir en Sorbonne: La faculté de théologie de Paris et la bulle Unigenitus 1714–1721. Paris, 1991.

Hammermayer, Ludwig. “Akademiebewegung und Wissenschaft sorganisation–Formen, Ten-denzen und Wandel in Europa während der zweiten Hälfte des 18. Jahrhunderts”, in Wissenschafts politik in Mittel- und Osteuropa. Wissenschaftsliche Gesellschaften, Akademien und Hochschulen im 18. und beginnenden 19. Jahrhundert, eds. Amburger, E., Ciesla, M. and Sziklay, L.. Berlin, 1976.Google Scholar

Hammermayer, Ludwig. Geschichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 1759–1807, 2 vols. Munich, 1983.

Hammerstein, Notker. “Die Universitätsgründungen im Zeichen der Aufklärung”, in Beiträge zu Problemen deutscher Universitätsgründungen der frühen Neuzeit, eds. Baumgart, P. and Hammerstein, N.. Nendeln, 1978.Google Scholar

Hammerstein, Notker. “Göttingen, eine deutsche Universität im Zeitalter der Aufklärung”, in Die Universität in Alteuropa, eds. Patschovsky, A. and Rabe, H.. Konstanz, 1994.Google Scholar

Hammerstein, Notker. Aufklärung und katholisches Reich. Untersuchungen zur Universitätsre form und Politik katholischer Territorien des Heiligen Römischen Reichs deutscher Nation im 18. Jahrhundert. Berlin, 1977.

Hammerstein, Notker. Ius und Historie. Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte des historischen Denkens an deutschen Universitäten im späten 17. und im 18. Jahrhundert. Göttingen, 1972.

Hartmann, Fritz, and Vierhaus, Rudolf, eds. Der Akademie gedanke im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Bremen and Wolfenbüttel, 1977.

Hellmuth, Eckhart, ed. The Transformation of Political Culture: England and Germany in the Late Eighteenth Century. Oxford, 1990.

Hochstrasser, T. J.Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment. Cambridge, 2000.

Kant, Immanuel. Der Streit der Fakultäten [1798], in Ak, vol. 7.

La Vopa, Anthony J.Grace, Talent and Merit: Poor Students, Clerical Careers and Professional Ideology in Eighteenth-Century Germany. Cambridge, 1988.

Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Politische Schriften, ed. Holz, H. H., 2 vols. Frankfurt am Main, 1966–7.

McClellan, James E., III. Science Reorganized: Scientific Societies in the Eighteenth Century. New York, NY, 1985.

McClelland, Charles E.State, Society, and University in Germany, 1700–1914. Cambridge, 1980.

Meinel, C. “Artibus Academicis Inserenda: Chemistry’s Place in Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth Century Universities”. History of Universities 7 (1988):.Google Scholar

Melton, James Horn. Absolutism and the Eighteenth-Century Origins of Compulsory Schooling in Prussia and Austria. Cambridge, 1988.

Mijnhardt, Wijnand W. “The Dutch Enlightenment: Humanism, Nationalism and Decline”, in The Dutch Republic in the Eighteenth Century: Decline, Enlightenment, and Revolution, eds. Jacob, M. C. and Mijnhardt, W. W., Ithaca, NY, 1992.Google Scholar

Oz-Salzberger, Fania. Translating the Enlightenment: Scottish Civic Discourse in Eighteenth-Century Germany. Oxford, 1995.

Porter, Roy, and Teich, Mikulas, eds. The Enlightenment in National Context. Cambridge, 1981.

Rethwisch, Conrad. Der Staatsminister Freiherr v. Zedlitz und Preussens höheres Schulwesen im Zeital–ter Friedrich des Grossen, 2nd edn. Berlin, 1886.

Roche, Daniel. “La diffusion des lumières. Un exemple: l’Académie de Châlons-sur Marne”. Annales: É conomies, Sociétés, Civilisations 19 (1964):.Google Scholar

Roche, Daniel. Le siècle des lumières en province: académies et académiciens provinciaux, 1680–1789, 2 vols. Paris, 1978.

Rüegg, Walther, general ed. A History of the University in Europe, in progress; Vol. 2: Universities in Early Modern Europe, ed. Ridder-Symoens, H.. Cambridge, 1996.

Schmitt, Charles B. “The Rise of the Philosophical Textbook”, in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, eds. Schmitt, C. B., Skinner, Q., and Eckhard Kessler. Cambridge, 1988.Google Scholar

Schneider, U. J. “The Teaching of Philosophy at German Universities in the Nineteenth Century”. History of Universities 12 (1993):.Google Scholar

Sher, Richard B.Church and University in the Scottish Enlightenment. The Moderate Literati of Edinburgh. Edinburgh, 1985.

Spurlock, Janis. “What Price Economic Prosperity? Public Attitudes to Physiocracy in the Reign of Louis XVI”. British Journal for Eighteenth Century Studies 9 (1986):.Google Scholar

Stichweh, Rudolf. Der frühmoderne Staat und die europäische Universität: Zur Interaktion von Politik und Erziehungssystem im Prozess ihrer Ausdifferenzierung (1618. Jahrhundert). Frankfurt am Main, 1991.

Stroup, Alice. A Company of Scientists: Botany, Patronage and Community at the Seventeenth-Century Parisian Royal Academy of Sciences. Berkeley, CA, 1990.

Totok, Wilhelm. “Leibniz als Wissenschaftsorganisator”, in Leibniz–sein Leben–sein Wirkenseine Welt, eds Totok, W. and Haase, C.. Hanover, 1966.Google Scholar

Tribe, Keith. Governing Economy: The Reformation of German Economic Discourse 1750–1840. Cambridge, 1988.

Vanpaemel, G.Echo’s van een wetenschappelijke revolutie: De mecanistische natuurwetenschap aan de Leuvense Artesfaculteit (1650–1797). Brussels, 1986.

Viguerie, Jean. Une oeuvre d’éducation sous l’Ancien Régime: les Pères de la doctrine chrétienne en France et en Italie 1592–1792. Paris, 1976.

Voltaire, François-Marie Arouet, Dictionnaire philosophique, eds. Benda, J. and Naves, P. (Paris, 1954)

Voss, J. “Die Akademien als Organisationsträger der Wissenschaften im 18. Jahrhundert”. Historische Zeitschrift 231 (1980):.Google Scholar

Zedlitz, Karl Abraham Freiherr von. “Vorschläge zur Verbesserung des Schulwesens in den Königlichen Ländern”. Berlinische Monatschrift 2 (1778):.Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.