ABDR (
1993 [?]), “Estatuto da Associação Brasileira de Direitos Reprográficos”, Associação Brasileira de Direitos Reprográficos (1993). Available at:
www.abdr.org.br/site/estatuto.asp Abramovay, R. (2010), “Desenvolvimento sustentável: qual a estratégia para o Brasil?” (2010) 87 Novos Estudos CEBRAP97–113
Adhikari, R. (2005), “Patents, Royalty Stacking and Management” (2005) 8 World Pharmaceutical Frontiers25–26
Advisory Council on Intellectual Property (2005), “Patents and Experimental Use”, Australian Government (October 2005)
Advocacia Geral da União (2007), “NOTA/INPI/PROC/CJCONS/N° 023/2006”, Procuradoria-Geral Federal do Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial (2007)
Afonso da Silva, L. V. (2005a), “O conteúdo essencial dos direitos fundamentais e a eficácia das normas constitucionais”, Full Professorial Thesis, Law School of the University of São Paulo (2005), p. 370
Afonso da Silva, L.V. (2005b), A constitucionalização do direito: os direitos fundamentais nas relações entre particulares (São Paulo: Malheiros Editores, 2005)
African Group, Draft WIPO Treaty on Exceptions and Limitations for the Disabled, Educational and Research Institutions, Libraries and Archive Centers (SCCR/20/11), WIPO Standing Committee on Copyright and Related Rights, Geneva (June 21–24, 2010)
Alexy, R. (2009), Teoria dos direitos fundamentais, translated by Virgílio Afonso da Silva (São Paulo: Malheiros, 2009), p. 669
Amaral Jr., A. (2011), Do comércio internacional e a proteção do meio ambiente (São Paulo: Atlas, 2011)
Andenas, M. and Zleptnig, S. (2007), “Proportionality: WTO Law in Comparative Perspective” (2007) 42 Texas International Law Journal370–427
Aoki, H. (2009), “Design Protection of Spare Parts from a Global Perspective: Types of Protection among Countries, and Trends in the EU and USA” (September 2009) AIPPI Journal295–319
Aras, A. (
2010), “Parecer do Procurador da República Augusto Aras MPF/CADE no. 23/2009 no âmbito da averiguação preliminar no. 08012.002673/2007–51”, CADE, March 8, 2010. Available at:
www.anfape.org.br/imagens/Parecer_do_MPF_08–03–10.pdf
Armstrong, C.et al. (2010), Access to Knowledge in Africa: The Role of Copyright (Claremont: UCT Press, 2010)
Aust, A. (2000), Modern Treaty Law and Practice (Cambridge University Press, 2000)
Aymé, S., Matthijs, G. and Soini, S. (2008), “Patenting and Licensing in Genetic Testing: Recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics” (2008) 16 European Journal of Human Genetics3–9
Bandeira de Mello, C. A. (2004), Curso de direito administrativo, 17th edn (São Paulo: Malheiros, 2004)
Barbosa, D. and Grau-Kuntz, K. (2010), Exclusions from Patentable Subject Matter and Exceptions and Limitations to the Rights: Biotechnology (SCP/15/3 – Annex III) (Geneva: WIPO, 2010)
Basheer, S. (2005), “Block Me Not: How ‘Essential’ are Patented Genes?” (2005) 1 Journal of Law, Technology & Policy55–96
Basheer, S., Purohit, S. and Reddy, P. (2010), Patent Exclusions that Promote Public Health Objectives (SCP/15/3, Annex IV) (Geneva: WIPO, 2010)
Bauer, R. J. (2005), “Why Not Try the Experiment and Stop Pointing the Finger? Modern University Unaffected by a Narrow Experimental Use Exception” (2005) 34 Temple Journal of Science and Technology & Environmental Law121–142
Bederman, D. J. (2001), Classical Canons: Rhetoric, classicism and treaty interpretation (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2001)
Bently, L. (2010), Exclusions from Patentability and Exceptions and Limitations to Patentees’ Rights (SCP/15/3, Annex I) (Geneva: WIPO, 2010)
Bergström, S. (1967) “Report on the Work of Main Committee I (Substantive Provisions of the Berne Convention: Articles 1 to 20)”, in BIRPI, Records of the Intellectual Property Conference of Stockholm, June 11 to July 14, vol. II (Geneva: BIRPI, 1967)
BIRPI (1967a), Reports on the Work of the Five Main Committees of the Intellectual Property Conference of Stockholm, 1967 (Geneva: BIRPI, 1967)
BIRPI (1967b), General Report of the Swedish/BIRPI Study Group Established on July 1, 1964: Diplomatic Conference of Stockholm, 1967 (DA/22/2) (Geneva: BIRPI, 1967)
Bostyn, S. J. R. (2004), Patenting DNA Sequences (Polynucleotides) and Scope of Protection in the European Union: An Evaluation – Background Study for the European Commission within the Framework of the Expert Group on Biotechnological Inventions (Brussels: European Commission, 2004)
Botero, C. (2009), Informe Anual de la Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos 2009: informe de la relatoría especial para la libertad de expresión (OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 51) (Washington, DC:Comisión Interamericana de Derechos Humanos, 2009)
Brennan, D. J. (2002), “The Three-step Test Frenzy: Why the TRIPS Panel Decision Might be Considered per incuriam” (2002) 2 Intellectual Property Quarterly221–225
Brownlie, I. (1998), Principles of Public International Law (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998)
Bruzzone, L. C. (1993), “The Research Exemption: A Proposal” (1993) 21 American Intellectual Property Law Association Quarterly Journal52–69
Byers, M. (2002), “Abuse of Rights: An Old Principle, a New Age” (2002) 47 McGill Law Journal390–431
Byström, M and Einarsson, P. (2001), Consequences for Developing Countries: Implications for Swedish Development Cooperation (Stockholm: Swedish International Development Cooperation Agency, 2001)
Caruso, A. J. (2003), “The Experimental Use Exception: An Experimentalist's View” (2003) 14 Albany Law Journal of Science & Technology215–244
Cheng, B. (1953), General Principles of Law as Applied by International Courts and Tribunals (London: Stevens & Sons Limited, 1953)
Clift, C. (2007), “Patenting and Licensing Research Tools”, in Krattiger, A.et al. (eds.), Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices, vol. 1 (Oxford and Davis, CA: MIHR and PIPRA, 2007), pp. 79–88
Commission of the European Communities (2004a), Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 98/71/EC on the legal protection of designs (COM(2004) 582 final) (Brussels: European Commission, 2004)
Commission on Human Rights (2001), Globalization and its Impact on the Full Enjoyment of Human Rights: Progress Report Submitted by J. Oloka-Onyango and Deepika Udagama, in accordance with Sub-Commission Resolution 1999/8 and Commission on Human Rights Decision 2000/102 (E/CN.4/Sub.2/2001/10) (Geneva: Commission on Human Rights, 2001)
Commission on Intellectual Property Rights (2002), Integrating Intellectual Property Rights and Development Policy (London: CIPR, 2002)
Committee on Civil and Political Rights (2001), “General Comment on Article 4” (CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add.11), adopted at the 1950th meeting, July 24, 2001
Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (2009), General Comment No. 21: Right of Everyone to Take Part in Cultural Life (Art. 15, para. 1(a), of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights) (E/C.12/GC/21). Economic and Social Council, Geneva (December 21, 2009)
Conceição, P., Heitor, M. V., Sirilli, G. and Wilson, R. (2004), “The ‘Swing of the Pendulum’ from Public to Market Support for Science and Technology: Is the US Leading the Way?” (2004) 71 Technological Forecasting and Social Change553–578
Correa, C. M. (2007), Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: A Commentary on the TRIPS Agreement (Oxford University Press, 2007)
Craveiro, G., Machado, J. and Ortellado, P. (2008), O mercado de livros técnicos e científicos no Brasil:subsídio público e acesso ao conhecimento (São Paulo: Grupo de Pesquisa em Políticas Públicas para o Acesso à Informação da Universidade de São Paulo, 2008)
Crespi, R. S. (2001), “Patents on Genes: Can the Issues be Clarified?” 3 (5) (2001) Bio-Science Law Review199–204
D’Amato, A. (1992), “Good Faith”, in Bernhardt, R. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1992), pp. 599–601
De Borja, A. G. (2008), “Exceptions to Design Rights: The Potential Impact of Article 26(2) TRIPS” (2008) 30 European Intellectual Property Review500–508
De Larena, L. R. (2005), “What Copyright Teaches Patent Law About ‘Fair Use’ and Why Universities Are Ignoring the Lesson” (2005) 84 Oregon Law Review779–819
De Schutter, O. (2009), Seed Policies and the Right to Food: Enhancing Agrobiodiversity, Encouraging Innovation. Background Document to the Report (A/64/170) Presented by Prof. Olivier De Schutter, Special Rapporteur on the Right to Food, at the 64th Session of the UN General Assembly (October 2009) (Geneva: OHCHR, 2009)
De Franco, D. W., Levy, C. M. and Pogach, M. L. (2006), “The Experimental Use Exception: Looking towards a Legislative Alternative” (2006) 6 Journal of High Technology Law93–111
Dennis, C. (2003), “Geneticists Question Fees for use of Patented ‘Junk’ DNA” (May 2003) 423 Nature105
Derzko, N. M. (2003), “In Search of a Compromised Solution to the Problem Arising from Patenting Biomedical Research Tools” (2003) 20 Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal347–409
Desmedt, A. (2001), “Proportionality in WTO Law” (2001) 4 Journal of International Economic Law441–480
Dinwoodie, G. B. and Dreyfuss, R. C. (2004), “International Intellectual Property Law and the Public Domain of Science” (2004) 7 Journal of International Economic Law431–448
Dinwoodie, G. B. and Dreyfuss, R. C. (2007), “Diversifying Without Discriminating: Complying with the Mandates of the TRIPS Agreement” (2007) 13 Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review445–456
Dreier, T. (2005), “Interpreting International IP Law: Some Observations Regarding WTO Dispute Resolution”, in Kur, A., Luginbuhl, S. and Waage, E. (eds.), “…und sie bewegt sich doch!” – Patent Law on the Move (Cologne: Carl Heymanns Verlag, 2005), pp. 45–62
Drexl, J., Hilty, R. and Kur, A. (2005), “Design Protection for Spare Parts and the Commission's Proposal for a Repairs Clause” (2005) 36 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law448–457
Dreyfuss, R. C. (2003), “Varying the Course in Patenting Genetic Material: A Counter-Proposal to Richard Epstein's Steady Course”, Public Law and Legal Theory Research Paper Series, Research Paper No. 59, New York University School of Law (April 2003)
Dreyfuss, R. C. (2004), “Protecting the Public Domain of Science: Has the Time for an Experimental Use Defense Arrived?” (2004) 46 Arizona Law Review457–472
Dreyfuss, R. C. (
2005), “Unique Works/Unique Challenges at the Intellectual Property/Competition Law Interface”, Law and Economics Research Paper No. 05–13, European Competition Law Annual, New York University (2005). Available at SSRN:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=763688 ECAR (2009), Why a Few Member States Should No Longer Block the Liberalization of the Vehicle Spare Parts Market: ECAR – Analysis of the Legal, Economic and Political Status of the “Repairs Clause” (Brussels: ECAR, 2009)
Eisenberg, R. S. (1989), “Patents and the Progress of Science: Exclusive Rights and Experimental Use” (1989) 56 University of Chicago Law Review1017–1086
Eisenberg, R. S. (2003), “Science and the Law: Patent Swords and Shields” (2003) 299 [5609] Science1018–1019
Eisenberg, R. S., Marks, A. and Annas, G. (2002), “Molecule vs. Information: Should Patents Protect Both? Symposium on Bioinformatics and Intellectual Property Law, April 27, 2001, Boston, Massachusetts” (2002) 8 Boston University Journal of Science & Technology190–217
Elkind, J. B. (1976), “Footnote to the Nuclear Test Cases: Abuse of Right – A Blind Alley for Environmentalists” (1976) 9 Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law57–98
European Parliament (2005), “European Parliament Resolution on Patents for Biotechnological Inventions”, October 26, 2005
European Parliament (2007), “Legislative Resolution of 12 December 2007 on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 98/71/EC on the Legal Protection of Designs (COM(2004)0582 – C 6–0119/2004 – 2004/0203(COD))”
European Union (2004), “Commission Proposes Enhancing Competition in the Market for Replacement Parts for Cars: Frequently Asked Questions” (MEMO/04/215), September 14, 2004
Feldman, M. P., Colaianni, A. and Liu Kang, C. (2007), “Lessons from the Commercialization of the Cohen-Boyer Patents: The Stanford University Licensing Program”, in Krattiger, A.et al. (eds.), Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices, vol. 2. (Oxford and Davis, CA: MIHR and PIPRA, 2007), pp. 1797–1808
Ficsor, M. (2003), Guide to the Copyright and Related Rights Treaties Administered by WIPO and Glossary of Copyright and Related Rights Terms (Geneva: WIPO, 2003)
Fitzmaurice, G. G. (1950), “The Law and Procedure of the International Court of Justice: General Principles and Substantive Law” (1950) 27 British Yearbook of International Law 1–41
Fontes, S. (2010), “MPF vai investigar ação de montadoras na área de reposição” Valor Econômico, September 1, 2010, B9.
Franck, T. M. (2008), “On Proportionality of Countermeasures in International Law” (2008) 102 The American Journal of International Law715–767
Frankel, S. (2005), “WTO Application of ‘the Customary Rules of Interpretation of Public International Law’” (2005) 46 Virginia Journal of International Law365–431
Frankel, S. (2010), “The Applicability of GATT Jurisprudence to the Interpretation of the TRIPS Agreement”, in Correa, C. M. (ed.), Research Handbook on Intellectual Property Law and the WTO (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2010), pp. 3–23
Freeburg, R. E. (2005), “No Safe Harbor and No Experimental Use: Is It Time for Compulsory Licensing of Biotech Tools?” (2005) 53 Buffalo Law Review351–408
Friedmann, W. (1963), “The Uses of ‘General Principles’ in the Development of International Law” (1963) 57 American Journal of International Law279–299
García, F. V. (1960), “State Responsibility: Fifth Report on International Responsibility” (A/CN.4/125 and Corr. 1) (1960) II Yearbook of the International Law Commission41–68
Gardiner, R. K. (2008), Treaty Interpretation (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Geiger, C. (2004), “Fundamental Rights, a Safeguard for the Coherence of Intellectual Property Law?” (2004) 35 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law269–280
Geiger, C. (2005), “Right to Copy v. Three-Step Test: The Future of the Private Copy Exception in the Digital Environment” (2005) 1 Computer Law Review International7–13
Geiger, C. (2006a), “Copyright and Free Access to Information: For a Fair Balance of Interests in a Globalised World” (2006) European Intellectual Property Review366–373
Geiger, C. (2006b), “The Private Copy Exception, an Area of Freedom (Temporarily) Preserved in the Digital Environment” (2006) 37 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 74–81
Geiger, C. (2006c), “The Three-Step Test, a Threat to a Balanced Copyright?” (2006c) 37 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law683–699
Geiger, C. (2007b), “Trade Marks and Freedom of Expression: The Proportionality of Criticism” (2007) 38 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law317–327
Geiger, C. (2008a), “Flexibilising Copyright: Remedies to the Privatisation of Information by Copyright Law” (2008) 39 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law178–197
Geiger, C. (2008b), “Rethinking Copyright Limitations in the Information Society: The Supreme Court Leads the Way” (2008) 39 International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law943–950
Gervais, D. (1998), The TRIPS Agreement: Drafting History and Analysis (London: Sweet & Maxwell, 1998)
Gervais, D. (2005), “Towards a New Core International Copyright Norm: The Reverse Three-Step Test” (2005) 9 Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review1–35
Ghidini, G. (2006), Intellectual Property and Competition Law: The Innovation Nexus (Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2006)
Ginsburg, J. C. (2001), “Toward Supranational Copyright Law? The WTO Panel Decision and the ‘Three-Step Test’ for Copyright Exceptions”, Center for Law and Economic Studies Working Paper No. 181, Columbia Law School (2001)
Gitter, D. M. (2001), “International Conflicts over Patenting Human DNA Sequences in The United States and The European Union: An Argument for Compulsory Licensing and a Fair-Use Exemption” (2001) 76 New York University Law Review1623–1691
Gold, E. R. and Joly, Y. (2010), The Patent System and Research Freedom: A Comparative Study (SCP/15/3 – Annex VI) (Geneva: WIPO, 2010)
Gold, E. R., Joly, Y. and Caulfield, T. (2005), “Genetic Research Tools, the Research Exception and Open Science” (2005) 3(2) GenEdit1–11
Goldscheider, R. (1995), “The Negotiation of Royalties and Other Sources of Income from Licensing” (1995) 36 IDEA1–17
Goldstein, P. (2001), International Copyright: Principles, Law and Practice (Oxford University Press, 2001)
Grubb, P. (
2002), “How Real are Patent Thickets, Reach-Through Rights, Royalty Stacking and Dependency, and Freedom-to-Operate Restrictions?”, OECD Berlin Workshop (2002). Available at:
www.oecd.org/dataoecd/16/4/1817832.pdf Hagelin, T. (2006), “The Experimental Use Exemption to Patent Infringement: Information on Ice, Competition on Hold” (2006) 58 Florida Law Review483–560.
Hamilton, D. P., “Silent Treatment: How Genentech, Novartis Stifled A Promising Drug: Biotech Firm Tried to Pursue Peanut-Allergy Injection but Contract Got in Way”, Wall Street Journal, April 5, 2005, p. A1
Hardin, G. (1968), “The Tragedy of the Commons” (1968) 162 Science, 1243–1248
Hardin, G. (1977), “Will Xerox kill Gutenberg?” (1977) 198 (4320) Science, 883
Heide, T. (1999), “The Berne Three-Step Test and the Proposed Copyright Directive” (1999) 21 European Intellectual Property Review105–109
Heller, M. A. and Eisenberg, R. (1998), “Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research” (1998) 280 (5364) Science698–701
Hestermeyer, H. (2007), Human Rights and the WTO: The Case of Patents and Access to Medicines (Oxford University Press, 2007)
Hilf, M. (2001), “Power, Rules and Principles – Which Orientation for WTO/GATT Law?” (2001) Journal of International Economic Law111–130
Hilf, M. and Goetz, J. G. (2003), “The Relation of Economic and Non-Economic Principles in International Law”, in Griller, S. (ed.), International Economic Governance and Non-Economic Concerns: New Challenges for the International Legal Order (Vienna, New York: Springer, 2003), pp. 5–46
Hilf, M. and Puth, S. (2002), “The Principle of Proportionality on its Way into WTO/GATT Law”, in Bogdandy, A. von and Mavroidis, P. C. (eds.), European Integration and International Coordination: Studies in Transnational Economic Law in Honour of Claus-Dieter Ehlermann (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2002), pp. 199–218
Hiraki, Y. (2000), “Problems Regarding the Patentability of Genomics and Scope of Protection of ESTs in Japan” (2000) CASRIP Newsletter17–26
Hoffman, D. C. (2003), “A Modest Proposal: Toward Improved Access to Biotechnology Research Tools by Implementing a Broad Experimental Use Exception” (2003) 89 Cornell Law Review993–1043
Houghton Mifflin (
2004),
American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edn (
Houghton Mifflin Company, 2004). Available at:
www.answers.com Howse, R. (2004), “Mainstreaming the Right to Development into International Trade Law and Policy at the World Trade Organization – Note by the Secretariat” (E/CN.4/Sub.2/2004/17). Commission on Human Rights, Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Geneva (June 9, 2004)
Hu, J. (2004), “The Role of International Law in the Development of WTO Law” (2004) 7 Journal of International Economic Law143–167
Hugenholtz, P. B. (1996), “Chronicle of The Netherlands: Dutch Copyright Law, 1990–1995” (1996) 169 Revue internationale du droit d’auteur128–195
Hugenholtz, P. B. (1997), “Fierce Creatures – Copyright Exemptions: Towards Extinction?”, IFLA/IMPRIMATUR Conference 1997
Hugenholtz, P. B., “Copyright and Freedom of Expression in Europe”, in Dreyfuss, R. C., First, H. and Zimmerman, D. L. (eds.), Innovation Policy in an Information Age (Oxford University Press, 2000)
Hugenholtz, P. B. and Okediji, R. L. (2008), Conceiving an International Instrument on Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright: Final Report (Amsterdam and Minnesota: Institute for Information Law University of Amsterdam and University of Minnesota, 2008)
Hughes, J. (1997), “The Philosophy of Intellectual Property”, in Moore, A. D. (ed.), Intellectual Property: Moral, Legal, and International Dilemmas (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 1997), pp. 107–177
HUGO Intellectual Property Committee (
2003), “Statement on the Scope of Gene Patents Research Exemption, and Licensing of Patented Gene Sequences for Diagnostics”, Human Genome Organisation (December 2003). Available at:
www.hugo-international.org/img/ip_gene_2003.pdf ICTSD (2010) (International Centre on Trade and Sustainable Development), “Litigating Environmental Protection and Public Health at the WTO: The Brazil-Retreaded Tyres Case”, ICTSD Information Note No. 1 (September 2010)
Iluyomade, B. O. (1975), “The Scope and Content of a Complaint of Abuse of Right in International Law” (1975) 16 Harvard International Law Journal47–92
International Law Commission (1966), “Draft Articles on the Law of Treaties with Commentaries” (1966) 2 Yearbook of the International Law Commission, 187–274
International Law Commission (2006), “Expulsion of Aliens: Memorandum by the Secretariat” (A/CN.4/565), International Law Commission, Fifty-Eighth Session (1 May–9 June and 3 July–11 August 2006)
IP Australia (2009), “Exemptions to Patent Infringement: Towards a Stronger and More Efficient IP Rights System”, Consultation Paper, Australian Government (2009)
Jalet, F. T. (1962), “The Quest for the General Principles of Law Recognized by Civilized Nations: A Study” (1962) 10 UCLA Law Review1041–1086
Jehoram, H. C. (2005), “Restrictions on Copyright and their Abuse” (2005) 27 European Intellectual Property Review359–364
Jensen, K. and Murray, F. (2005), “Intellectual Property Landscape of the Human Genome” (2005) 310 Science239–240
Johnson, J. A. (2003), “The Experimental Use Exception in Japan: A Model for US Patent Law?” (2003) 12 Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal499–533
Jones, K. J., Whitham, M. E. and Handler, P. S. (2007), “Problems with Royalty Rates, Royalty Stacking, and Royalty Packing Issues”, in Krattiger, A.et al. (eds.), Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A handbook of Best Practices, vol. 2 (Oxford and Davis, CA: MIHR and PIPRA, 2007), pp. 1121–1126
Kang, K., Ryu, T. and Lee, Y. (2009), “Effects of Research Tool Patents on Biotechnology Innovation in a Developing Country: A Case Study of South Korea” (2009) BMC Biotechnology9–25
Kingsbury, B. and Schill, S. (2009), “Investor-State Arbitration as Governance: Fair and Equitable Treatment, Proportionality and the Emerging Global Administrative Law”, IILJ Working Paper 2009/6 (Global Administrative Law Series), New York University School of Law
Kiss, A. (2009), “Abuse of Rights”, in Wolfrum, R. (ed.), Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law (Heidelberg and Oxford: Max Planck Institute for Comparative Public Law and International Law and Oxford University Press, 2009)
Koelman, K. J. (2006), “Fixing the Three-Step Test” (2006) 28 European Intellectual Property Review407–412
Kolb, R. (2006), “Principles as Sources of International Law (with Special Reference to Good Faith)” (2006) 53 Netherlands International Law Review1–36
Koskenniemi, M. (2006), Fragmentation of International Law: Difficulties Arising from the Diversification and Expansion of International Law (A/CN.4/L.682) (Geneva: International Law Commission, 2006)
Kratiger, A. (2007), “Freedom to Operate, Public Sector Research, and Product-Development Partnerships: Strategies and Risk-Management Options”, in Krattiger, A., et al. (eds.), Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices, vol. 2 (Oxford and Davis, CA: MIHR and PIPRA, 2007), pp. 1317–1327
Kur, A. (2008), “Of Oceans, Islands, and Inland Water: How Much Room for Exceptions and Limitations under the Three Step-Test?”, Research Paper Series No. 08–04, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law (2008), p. 48
Kur, A. and Levin, M. (2006), “Agreement on Trade-related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights: Synopsis of Original Version and Proposals for Amendment”, ATRIP conference, Parma (2006)
Kur, A. and Ruse-Khan, H. G. (2009), Enough is Enough: The Notion of Binding Ceilings in International Intellectual Property Protection (Munich: Max Planck Institute, 2009)
Lauterpacht, H. (1949), “Restrictive Interpretation and the Principle of Effectiveness in the Interpretation of Treaties” (1949) 26 British Yearbook of International Law48–85
Lewinski, S. von (2008), International Copyright Law and Policy (Oxford University Press, 2008)
Lichtman, D. G. (
1999), “Property Rights in Emerging Platform Technologies”, John M. Olin Law & Economics Working Paper No. 97, University of Chicago Law School (1999). Available at SSRN:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=216533 Lipszyc, D. (2001), Derecho de autor y derechos conexos (Buenos Aires: Ediciones UNESCO, CERLALC and Zavalia, 2001)
Macmillan, F. (1999), “Striking the Copyright Balance in the Digital Environment” (1999) 10 International Company and Commercial Law Review350–360
Masouyé, C. (1978), Guía del Convenio de Berna para la Protección de las Obras Literarias y Artística (Acta de París, 1971) (Geneva: OMPI, 1978)
Matthijs, G. (2004), “Patenting Genes: May Slow Down Innovation and Delay Availability of Cheaper Genetic Tests” (2004) 329 BMJ1358–1360
McGrady, B. (2009), “Necessity Exceptions in WTO Law: Retreated Tyres, Regulatory Purpose and Cumulative Regulatory Measures” (2009) 12 Journal of International Economic Law1–21
McMullen, J. A. and Halprin, D. A. (1993), “New Technique for Quantifying Reasonable Royalty from Appropriate Case Law” (1993) 75 Journal of the Patent and Trademark Office Society843–847
McNair, L. (1961), The Law of Treaties (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1961)
Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary (Merriam-Webster, Inc.). Available at:
http://mw.com/ Merton, R. K. (1977), “La estructura normativa de la ciencia”, in Storer, N. W. (ed.), La sociología de la ciencia, 2: investigaciones teóricas y empíricas (Madrid: Alianza Editorial, 1977), pp. 355–368
Ministério da Cultura (
2010c), “Projeto de Lei: Altera e acresce dispositivos à Lei n
o 9.610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998, que altera, atualiza e consolida a legislação sobre direitos autorais e dá outras providências”. Available at:
http://www.cultura.gov.br/consultadireitoautoral/consulta/ Mitchell, A. D. (2007), “The Legal Basis for Using Principles in WTO Dispute” (2007) 10 Journal of International Economic Law795–835
Morato Filho, D. S. (2007), “Contestação da Associação Brasileira de Direitos Reprográficos”, Ação Civil Pública no. 583.00.2006.158832 proposta pelo Instituto de Direito do Comércio Internacional e Desenvolvimento, March 27, 2007
Mueller, J. M. (2001), “No ‘Dilettante Affair’: Rethinking the Experimental Use Exception to Patent Infringement form Biomedical Research Tools” (2001) 76 Washington Law Review1–66
Murray Neto, A., Mazieiro, E., Sesina, E. and Polido, F. P. (2010), “Contra-notificação extrajudicial – Professora Dra. Kátia Rubio – Uso de expressão ‘Olímpicos’ – Obra ‘Esporte, Educação e Valores Olímpicos’”, February 2, 2010
National Research Council (2006), Reaping the Benefits of Genomic and Proteomic Research: Intellectual Property Rights, Innovation, and Public Health (Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2006)
Neumann, J. and Turk, E. (2003), “Necessity Revisited: Proportionality in World Trade Organization Law after Korea–Beef, EC–Asbestos and EC–Sardines” (2003) 37 Journal of World Trade199–233
NIH (
1998), “Report of the National Institutes of Health Working Group on Research Tools”, presented to the Advisory Committee to the Director on June 4, 1998. Available at:
www.nih.gov/news/researchtools/ NIH – Office of Technology Transfer (1999), “Sharing Biomedical Research Resources: Principles and Guidelines for Recipients of NIH Research Grants and Contracts” (1999) 64 Federal Register, 100, 28205–28209
Nordemann, W., Vinck, K. and Hertin, P. W. (1983), Droit d’Auteur international et droits voisins dans les pays de langue allemande et les Etats membres de la Communauté européenne (Brussels: Bruylant, 1983)
Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2002), The Ethics of Patenting DNA: A Discussion Paper (London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics, 2002)
Okediji, R. (2000), “Towards an International Fair Use Doctrine” (2000) 39 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law75–175
O’Rourke, M. A. (2000), “Toward a Doctrine of Fair Use in Patent Law” (2000) 100 Columbia Law Review1177–1249
Ost, F. (1990), Droit et intérêt: entre droit et non-droit: l’intérêt, vol. 2 (Brussels: Publications des facultés universitaires Saint-Louis Bruxelles, 1990)
OECD (2002), Genetic Inventions, Intellectual Property Rights and Licensing Practices: Evidence and Policies (Paris: OECD, 2002)
OECD (2006), Guidelines for the Licensing of Genetic Inventions (Paris: OECD, 2006)
OHCHR (2001), The Impact of the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights on Human Rights, UN Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/2001/13 (Geneva, June 27, 2001)
OHCHR (2005), Human Rights and World Trade Agreements: Using General Exception Clauses to Protect Human Rights (New York and Geneva, United Nations, 2005)
Office of the United States Trade Representative (
2010), “2010 Special 301 Report”, April 30, 2010. Available at:
www.ustr.gov/webfm_send/1906 Ortino, F. (2005), “From ‘Non-discrimination’ to ‘Reasonableness’: A Paradigm Shift in International Economic Law?”, Jean Monnet Working Paper 01/05, New York University (2005)
Ostrom, E. and Hess, C. (2003), “Artifacts, Facilities, and Content: Information as a Common-pool Resource” (2003) 66 Law & Contemporary Problems44–79
Ostrom, E. and Hess, C., Understanding Knowledge as a Commons: From Theory to Practice (Cambridge, MA, MIT: 2007)
Paradise, J. and Janson, C. (2006), “Decoding the research exemption” (2006) 7 Nature Reviews Genetics148–154
Pereira dos Santos, M. J. (2007), “Parecer: consulta realizada pela Associação Brasileira de Direitos Reprográficos a respeito da interpretação e aplicação do art. 46, II da Lei no. 9.610, de 19 de fevereiro de 1998”, ABDR, March 20, 2007
Pochmann, P. (2007), “O país dos desiguais” Le monde diplomatique Brasil (October 2007) 16–18
Ragazzo, C. E. J. (2010), “Voto – Averiguação Preliminar no. 08012.002673/200 7–51 – Representante: Associação Nacional dos Fabricantes de Autopeças; Representadas: Volkswagen do Brasil Indústria de Veículos Automotivos Ltda; Fiat Automóveis S.A. e Ford Motor Company Brasil Ltda”, Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (December 15, 2010)
Rai, A. K. and
Eisenberg, R. S. (
2003), “
The Public and the Private in Biopharmaceutical Research”, in
Boyle, J. (ed.),
Collected Papers: Conference on the Public Domain (
Durham:
Center for the Study of the Public Domain, 2003), pp.
157–175. Available at:
www.law.duke.edu/pd/papers/raieisen.pdf Razgaitis, R. (2007), “Pricing the Intellectual Property of Early-Stage Technologies: A Primer of Basic Valuation Tools and Considerations”, in Krattiger, A.et al. (eds.), Intellectual Property Management in Health and Agricultural Innovation: A Handbook of Best Practices, vol. 1 (Oxford and Davis, CA: MIHR and PIPRA, 2007), pp. 813–860
Reichman, J. H. (2000), “Of Green Tulips and Legal Kudzu: Repacking Rights in Subpatentable Innovation” (2000) 53 Vanderbilt Law Review1743–1798
Richer, A. G. (2010), “Carta do Comitê Olímpico Brasileiro, datada de 15 de janeiro de 2010, endereçada à Profa. Kátia Rubio” – Ofício 2887/2009/AGR/tcs, Comitê Olímpico Brasileiro, January 15, 2010
Ricketson, S. (1987), The Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works: 1886–1986 (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 1987)
Ricketson, S. (2003), WIPO Study on Limitations and Exceptions of Copyright and Related Rights in the Digital Environment (SCCR/9/7) (Geneva: WIPO, 2003)
Ricketson, S. and Ginsburg, J. C. (2006), International Copyright and Neighbouring Rights: The Berne Convention and Beyond, vol. 1 (Oxford University Press, 2006)
Rivers, L. N. (
2002), “Introduction of the ‘Genomic Research and Diagnostic Accessibility Act of 2002’ H.R. 3967 and the ‘Genomic Science and Technology Innovation Act of 2002’ H.R. 3966”, US House of Representatives, March 14, 2002. Available at:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?r107:E14MR 2–0020
Rodrigues Jr., E. B. and Carboni, G. (2006), “Ação Civil Pública proposta pelo Instituto de Direito do Comércio Internacional e Desenvolvimento, em 1° de junho de 2006, em face da Associação Brasileira de Direitos Reprográficos”, Poder Judiciário de São Paulo, June 1, 2006 (on file with author)
Ruse-Khan, H. G. (2008), “A Comparative Analysis of Policy Space in WTO Law”, Research Paper Series no. 08–02, Max Planck Institute for Intellectual Property, Competition and Tax Law, p. 68
Sachs, I. (2007), “Em busca de novas estratégias de desenvolvimento”, in Sachs, I. and Vieira, P. F. (eds.), Rumo à ecossocioeconomia: teoria e prática do desenvolvimento (São Paulo: Cortez, 2007), pp. 247–284
Schmieder, S. (2004), “Scope of Biotechnology Inventions in the United States and in Europe – Compulsory Licensing, Experimental Use and Arbitration: A Study of Patentability of DNA-Related Inventions with Special Emphasis on the Establishment of an Arbitration-Based Compulsory Licensing System” (2004) 21 Santa Clara Computer & High Technology Law Journal163–234
Schreuer, C. H. (1974), “Unjustified Enrichment in International Law” (1974) 22 American Journal of Comparative Law281–301
Scotchmer, S., “Standing on the Shoulders of Giants: Cumulative Research and the Patent Law” (1991) 5 Journal of Economic Perspectives29–41
SACGHS (2009), Public Consultation Draft Report on Gene Patents and Licensing Practices and Their Impact on Patient Access to Genetic Tests (SACGHS Public Consultation Draft Report for Public Comment from March 9 to May 15, 2009)
SDE (
2008), “Relatório da averiguação preliminar – Autos no. 08012.002673/200 7–51. Representante: Associação Nacional dos Fabricantes de Autopeças (ANFAPE); representada: Volkswagen do Brasil Indústria de Veículos Automotivos Ltda.; Fiat Automóveis S/A; Ford Motor Company Brasil Ltda.”, Ministério da Justiça da República Federativa do Brasil (March 10, 2008). Available at:
www.anfape.org.br/imagens/Nota%20Tecnica%20Final%20-%20SDE%201 0–0 3–2008.pdf
Senftleben, M. (2004), Copyright, Limitations and the Three-Step Test: An Analysis of the Three-Step Test in International and EC Copyright Law (The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 2004)
Senftleben, M. (2006), “Towards a Horizontal Standard for Limiting Intellectual Property Rights? WTO Panel Reports Shed Light on the Three-Step Test in Copyright Law and Related Tests in Patent and Trade Mark Law” (2006) 37 IIC407–438
Shapiro, R. J. (2005), “AIDS Drug Patent Uproar Brazil Attacks Foundations of American Prosperity”, San Francisco Chronicle, July 14, 2005
Sheremeta, L. and Gold, E. R. (2003), “Creating a Patent Clearinghouse in Canada: A Solution to Problems of Equity and Access” (2003) 11 Health Law Review17–21
Sherman, B. (2010), Computer Programs as Excluded Patentable Subject Matter (SCP/15/3 – ANNEX II) (Geneva: WIPO, 2010)
Simma, B. and Paulus, A. L. (1999), “The Responsibility of Individuals for Human Rights Abuses in Internal Conflicts: A Positivist View” (1999) 93 American Journal of International Law291–423
Sinclair, I. (1984), The Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, 2nd edn (Man-chester University Press, 1984)
Soares, G. F. S. (2001), Direito internacional do meio ambiente: emergência, obrigações e responsabilidades (São Paulo: Atlas, 2001)
Stiglitz, J. E. (1995), The Theory of International Public Goods and the Architecture of International Organizations (New York: United Nations Department for Economic and Social Information and Policy Analysis, 1995)
Story, A. (2009), “The Global Copyright System: Unbalanced and Unbalanceable for Educational Access in the Global South”, South Centre Third International Symposium, 2009
Story, A., Darch, C. and Halbert, D. (2006), The Copy/South Dossier: Issues in the Economics, Politics, and Ideology of Copyright in the Global South (Copy/South, 2006)
Strandburg, K. J. (2004), “What Does the Public Get? Experimental Use and the Patent Bargain” (2004) Wisconsin Law Review81–155
Sun, H. (2007), “Overcoming the Achilles Heel of Copyright Law” (2007) 5 Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property267–331
Sweet, A. S. and Mathews, J. (2008), “Proportionality Balancing and Global Constitutionalism” (2008) 47 Columbia Journal of Transnational Law72–164
Taubman, A. (2007), “TRIPS Jurisprudence in the Balance: Between the Realist Defense of Policy Space and a Shared Utilitarian Ethic”, in Lenk, C., Hoppe, N. and Andorno, R., Ethics and Law of Intellectual Property: Current Problems in Politics, Science and Technology (Aldershot: Ashgate, 2007), pp. 89–122
Taylor, G. D. S. (1972), “The Content of the Rule Against Abuse of Rights in International Law” (1972) 46 British Yearbook of International Law323–352
Thumm, N. (2004), Research and Patenting in Biotechnology: A Survey in Switzerland (Bern: Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property, 2004)
Thursby, J. and Thursby, M. (2003), “University Licensing and the Bayh–Dole Act” (2003) 301 Science1052
UNCTAD–ICTSD (2005), Resource Book on TRIPS and Development (Cambridge University Press, 2005)
UNEP (2010) (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity – TEEB for Business: Executive Summary (United Nations Environment Programme, 2010)
UNFCCC (2009), “Non-paper No. 36 – Proposed by the Co-Chairs”, Ad Hoc Working Group on Long-Term Cooperative Action Under the Convention, Barcelona, November 2–6, 2009
US Department of Justice (
2010), “Brief for the United States as Amicus Curiae in Support of Neither Party: In the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit:
The Association for Molecular Pathology et al. v. United States Patent and Trademark Office, Myriad Genetics, Inc.”, October 29, 2010. Available at:
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/business/genepatents-USamicusbrief.pdf Van Overwalle, G. (2006), “The Implementation of the Biotechnology Directive in Belgium and its After-Effects: The Introduction of a New Research Exemption and a Compulsory Licence for Public Health” (2006) 37 IIC889–920
Van Overwalle, G., Van Zimmeren, E., Verbeure, B. and Matthijs, G. (2006), “Models for Facilitating Access to Patents on Genetic Inventions” (2006) 7 Nature Reviews Genetics143–148
Veiga, J. E. da (2010), Sustentabilidade: A legitimação de um novo valor (São Paulo: Editora Senac, 2010)
Verschuuren, J., Principles of Environmental Law: The Ideal of Sustainable Development and the Role of Principles of International, European and National Environmental Law (Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, 2003)
Virally, M. (2000), “Fuentes del derecho internacional”, in Sorensen, M. (ed.), Manual de derecho internacional público (México, D.F., Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2000), pp. 172–176
Visser, C. (2011), Patent Exceptions and Limitations in the Health Context (SCP/15/3 – Annex V) (Geneva: WIPO, 2011)
Waldeck und Pyrmont, W. Prinz zu (2008), “Research Tool Patents after Integra v Merck: Have They Reached a Safe Harbor?” (2008) 14 Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review367–446
Walljasper, J. (2010), All That We Share: A Field Guide to the Commons (New York: New Press, 2010)
Walsh, J. P., Arora, A. and Cohen, W. M. (2003), “Effects of Research Tool Patents and Licensing on Biomedical Innovation”, in Cohen, W. M. and Merrill, S. A. (eds.), Patents in the Knowledge-Based Economy (Washington, DC.: National Academy of Sciences, 2003)
Weber, D. (2004), “Abuse of Law: European Court of Justice, 14 December 2000, Case C-110/99, Emsland-Stärke” (2004) 31 Legal Issues of Economic Integration43–55
Weschler, C. (2004), “The Informal Experimental Use Exception: University Research after Madey v. Duke University” (2004) 79 NYU Law Review1536–1569
WHO (2008), Global Strategy and Plan of Action on Public Health, Innovation and Intellectual Property (WHA61.21) (Geneva: WHO, 2008)
WIPO (1971a), Records of the Intellectual Property Conference of Stockholm (June 11 to July 14, 1967), vol. I (Geneva: WIPO, 1971)
WIPO (1971b), Records of the Intellectual Property Conference of Stockholm (June 11 to July 14, 1967), vol. II (Geneva: WIPO, 1971)
WIPO (2010), “Proposal from Brazil” (SCP/14/7), Standing Committee on the Law of Patents, January 25 to 29, 2010
WIPO (2010), “Conclusiones del SCCR/21”, Comité Permanente de Derecho de Autor y Derechos Conexos, November 8–12, 2010
World Commission on Environment and Development (1987), Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (A/42/427) (New York: United Nations, 1987)
WTO (2001), “Submission by the African Group, Barbados, Bolivia, Brazil, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Honduras, India, Indonesia, Jamaica, Pakistan, Paraguay, Philippines, Peru, Sri Lanka, Thailand and Venezuela” (IP/C/W/296), Council for Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, June 29, 2001
WTO (2002), GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Practice Relating to GATT Article XX, paragraphs (b), (d) and (g) (WT/CTE/W/203) (Geneva: Committee on Trade and Environment, 2002)
WTO (2003), Working Party on Domestic Regulation: “Necessity Tests” in the WTO: Note by the Secretariat (S/WPDR/W/27) (Geneva: WTO, 2003)
WTO and UNEP (2009), Trade and Climate Change: A WTO–UNEP Report (Geneva: WTO and UNEP, 2009)
Xalabarder, R. (2003), “Copyright and Digital Distance Learning Education: The Use of Pre-Existing Works in Distance Education Through the Internet” (2003) 26 The Columbia Journal of Law & Arts101–178
Xavier, F. C. (2008), Justiça Divina: estudos e dissertações em torno da substância religiosa de O Céu e O Inferno/ pelo Espírito Emmanuel, 13th edn (Rio de Janeiro: Federação Espírita Brasileira, 2008)
Xiuli, H. (2007), “The Application of the Principle of Proportionality in Tecmed v. Mexico” (2007) 6 Chinese Journal of International Law635–652
Yambrusic, E. S. (1987), Treaty Interpretation: Theory and Reality (Lanham: University Press of America, 1987)
Yu, P. K. (2003), “The Copyright Divide”, Public Law & Legal Theory Working Paper Series – Research Paper no. 10–21 (2003)
Zeitler, H. E. (2005), “‘Good Faith’ in the WTO Jurisprudence: Necessary Balancing Element or an Open Door to Judicial Activism?” (2005) 8 Journal of International Economic Law721–758
Zhang, N. (2007), “Treaty Interpretation of the WTO Dispute Settlement” (2007) US–China Law Review22–31
Zovko, N. M. (2006), “Nanotechnology and the Experimental Use Defense to Patent Infringement” (2006) 37 McGeorge Law Review129–156
