Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 1
  • Cited by
    This chapter has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Botero, Juan Carlos Pinzon-Rondon, Angela Maria and Pratt, Christine S. 2017. How, When and Why Do Governance, Justice and Rule of Law Indicators Fail Public Policy Decision Making in Practice?. Hague Journal on the Rule of Law, Vol. 8, Issue. 1, p. 51.


    ×
  • Print publication year: 2015
  • Online publication date: June 2015

Introduction: The Local-Global Life of Indicators: Law, Power, and Resistance

Summary

This book is about the quiet exercise of power through indicators. With the turn to evidence-based governance, reliance on statistical data along with its synthesis into the kinds of scales, ranks, and composite indexes we refer to as indicators has become essential for policy formation and political decision making. The use of indicators in governance has expanded from economic and sector-specific quantitative data to measurement of almost every phenomenon. This book focuses on indicators of governance itself, specifically governance through law: indicators purporting to measure practices or perceptions of good governance, rule of law, corruption, regulatory quality, and related matters.

This volume presents nine original case studies that investigate how leading indicators of legal governance produced with global or transnational scope or aims are created, disseminated, and used, and with what effects. The indicators studied include Freedom House's Freedom in the World indicator, the Global Reporting Initiative's structure for measuring and reporting on corporate social responsibility, the World Justice Project's measurement of the rule of law, the Doing Business index of the International Finance Corporation of the World Bank, the World Bank–supported Worldwide Governance Indicators, the World Bank's Country Performance Institutional Assessment (CPIA), the Transparency International Corruption (Perceptions) index, and several indicators (including some of these) used by the U.S. Millennium Challenge Corporation in determining which countries are eligible to receive certain US aid funds.

The underlying theoretical framework of this volume is the linkage between knowledge and power. Indicators are both a form of knowledge and a technology for governance. Like other forms of knowledge, indicators influence governance when they form the basis for political decision making, public awareness, and the terms in which problems are conceptualized and solutions imagined. Conversely, the kinds of information embodied in indicators, the forms in which they are produced and disseminated, and how they function as knowledge are all influenced by governance practices.

Recommend this book

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

The Quiet Power of Indicators
  • Online ISBN: 9781139871532
  • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139871532
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


Nehal Bhuta . 2012. “Governmentalizing Sovereignty: Indexes of State Fragility and the Calculability of Political Order.” In Kevin Davis , Angelina Fisher , Benedict Kingsbury , and Sally Engle Merry (eds.), Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Classification and Rankings,132–162. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Nehal Bhuta . 2015. “Measuring Stateness, Ranking Political Orders: Indexes of State Fragility and State Failure.” In Alexander Cooley and Jack Snyder (eds.), Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Mlada Bukovansky . 2015. “Corruption Rankings: Constructing and Contesting the Global Anti-Corruption Agenda.” In Alexander Cooley and Jack Snyder (eds.), Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tim Buthe . 2012. “Beyond Supply and Demand: A Political-Economic Conceptual Model.” In Kevin Davis , Angelina Fisher , Benedict Kingsbury , and Sally Engle Merry (eds.), Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Classification and Rankings,29–51. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Alexander Cooley , and Jack Snyder . 2015. Ranking the World: Grading States as a Tool of Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kevin E Davis . 2014. “Legal Indicators: The Power of Quantitative Measures of Law.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10: 37–52.

Kevin E Davis ., and Michael B. Kruse . 2007. “Taking the Measure of Law: The Case of the Doing Business Project.” Law and Social Inquiry 32(4): 1095–1120.

Kevin Davis , Benedict Kingsbury , and Sally Engle Merry . 2012. “Indicators as a Technology of Global Governance.” Law and Society Review 46(1): 71–104.

Kevin Davis , Angelina Fisher , Benedict Kingsbury , and Sally Engle Merry (eds.), 2012. Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Classification and Rankings. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Yves Dezalay , and Bryant G Garth . 2002. The Internationalization of Palace Wars: Lawyers, Economists, and the Contest to Transform the Latin American State. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Wendy Nelson Espeland , and Mitchell L. Stevens . 1998. “Commensuration as a Social Process.” Annual Review of Sociology 24: 313–343.

Ian Hacking . 1990. The Taming of Chance. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

Terrence C Halliday . 2012. “Legal Yardsticks: International Financial Institutions as Diagnosticians and Designers of the Laws of Nations.” In Kevin Davis , Angelina Fisher , Benedict Kingsbury , and Sally Engle Merry (eds.), Governance by Indicators: Global Power through Classification and Rankings,180–217. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Terrence C Halliday ., and Gregory Shaffer (eds.). 2015. Transnational Legal Orders. Cambridge Series in Law and Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Judith Kelley , and Beth Simmons . 2015. “Politics by Number: Indicators as Social Pressure in International Relations.” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 55–70.

Andrew B Kipnis . 2008. “Audit cultures: Neoliberal governmentality, socialist legacy, or technologies of governing?American Ethnologist 35(2): 275–289.

Martha Lampland . 2010. “False Numbers as Formalizing Practices.” Social Studies of Science 40(2010): 377–404.

Sally Engle Merry . 2014. “Global Legal Pluralism and the Temporality of Soft Law.” Special Issue on Temporalities of Law, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 46(1): 108–122.

Sally Engle Merry , and Susan Coutin . 2014. “Technologies of Truth in the Anthropology of Conflict.” Co-authored with Susan Coutin. American Ethnologist 41(1): 1–16.

Mary Poovey . 1998. A History of the Modern Fact: Problems of Knowledge in the Sciences of Wealth and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Beth A Simmons . 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Marilyn Strathern (ed.). 2000. Audit Cultures: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics, and the Academy. London and New York: Routledge.

Symposium 2011. “Indices and Indicators of Justice, Governance, and the Rule of Law: An Overview.” In Juan Carlos Botero , Robert L. Nelson , and Christine Pratt (eds.), Hague Journal on the Rule of Law 3: 2.