References
Aizawa, K. and Gillett, C. (eds.) (2016). Scientific Composition and Metaphysical Grounding, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
Aizawa, K. and Gillett, C. (2019). Defending Pluralism about Compositional Explanations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological & Biomedical Sciences, 78, 101202.
Antony, L. (2003). Who’s Afraid of Disjunctive Properties? Philosophical Issues, 13, 1–21.
Armstrong, D. M. (1997). A World of States of Affairs, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bartol, J. (2016). Biochemical Kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67, 531–551.
Bird, A. (2018a). The Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. Synthese, 195, 1397–1426.
Bird, A. (2018b). I – Fundamental Powers, Evolved Powers, and Mental Powers. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume, 92, 247–275.
Boyd, R. (1991). Realism, Anti-foundationalism, and the Enthusiasm for Natural Kinds. Philosophical Studies, 61, 127–148.
Boyd, R. (1999). Homeostasis, Species, and Higher Taxa. In Wilson, R., ed., Species: New Interdisciplinary Essays, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 141–185.
Breitenbach, A. and Choi, Y. (2017). Pluralism and the Unity of Science. The Monist, 100, 391–405.
Carnap, R. (1928). Der Logische Aufbau der Welt, Leipzig: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Carnap, R. (1934). The Unity of Science, London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, and Co.
Cartwright, N. (1999). The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chakravartty, A. (2007). A Metaphysics for Scientific Realism: Knowing the Unobservable, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chang, H. (2016). The Rising of Chemical Natural Kinds through Epistemic Iteration. In Kendig, C., ed., Natural Kinds and Classification in Scientific Practice, London: Routledge, pp. 33–47.
Clapp, L. (2001). Disjunctive Properties: Multiple Realizations. Journal of Philosophy, 98, 111–136.
Daston, L. and Galison, P. (2007). Objectivity, New York: Zone Books.
Dorr, C. and Hawthorne, J. (2013). Naturalness. In Bennett, K. and Zimmerman, D., eds., Oxford Studies in Metaphysics, vol. 8, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 3–77.
Dupré, J. (1983). The Disunity of Science. Mind, 92, 321–346.
Dupré, J. (1995). The Disorder of Things: Metaphysical Foundations of the Disunity of Science, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Dupré, J. (2012). Processes of Life: Essays in the Philosophy of Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dyson, F. (1979). Time without End: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe. Reviews of Modern Physics, 51, 447–460.
Ellis, B. D. (2001). Scientific Essentialism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fodor, J. (1974). Special Sciences (Or: The Disunity of Science as a Working Hypothesis). Synthese, 28, 77–115.
Fodor, J. (1997). Special Sciences: Still Autonomous after All These Years. Philosophical Perspectives, 11, 149–163.
Franklin, A. and Knox, E. (2018). Emergence without Limits: The Case of Phonons. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B, 64, 68–78.
Gatherer, D. (2010). So What Do We Really Mean When We Say That Systems Biology Is Holistic? BMC Systems Biology 4(22), 1–12.
Gillett, C. (2007). Understanding the New Reductionism: The Metaphysics of Science and Compositional Reduction. Journal of Philosophy, 104, 193–216.
Gillett, C. (2010). Moving Beyond the Subset Model of Realization: The Problem of Qualitative Distinctness in the Metaphysics of Science. Synthese, 177, 165–192.
Gillett, C. (2016). Reduction and Emergence in Science and Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2011). Induction, Samples, and Kinds. In Campbell, J., O’Rourke, M., and Slater, M. (eds.), Carving Nature at Its Joints: Topics in Contemporary Philosophy, vol. 8, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 33–52.
Goodwin, W. (2011). Structure, Function, and Protein Taxonomy. Biology and Philosophy, 26, 533–545.
Hacking, I. (2007a). The Contingencies of Ambiguity. Analysis, 67, 269–277.
Hacking, I. (2007b). Natural Kinds, Rosy Dawn, Scholastic Twilight. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 82, 203–239.
Havstad, J. C. (2018). Messy Chemical Kinds. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 69, 719–43.
Hawley, K. and Bird, A. (2011). What Are Natural Kinds? Philosophical Perspectives, 25, 205–221.
Heil, J. (2003a). From an Ontological Point of View, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Heil, J. (2003b). Levels of Reality. Ratio, 16, 205–221.
Hempel, C. G. (1942). The Function of General Laws in History. Journal of Philosophy, 39, 35–48.
Hempel, C. G. and Oppenheim., P. (1948). Studies in the Logic of Explanation. Philosophy of Science, 15, 135–175
Hempel, C. G. (1965). Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York: Free Press.
Hendry, R. F. (2010). Ontological Reduction and Molecular Structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 41, 183–191.
Hendry, R. F. (2012). Chemical Substances and the Limits of Pluralism. Foundations of Chemistry, 14, 55–68.
Hommen, D. (forthcoming). Kinds as Universals: A Neo‑Aristotelian Approach. Erkenntnis. doi: 10.1007/s10670-019-00105-6.
Keinänen, M. and Tahko, T. E. (2019). Bundle Theory with Kinds. Philosophical Quarterly, 69, 838–857.
Kemeny, J. G., and Oppenheim, P. (1956). On Reduction. Philosophical Studies, 7, 6–19.
Kendig, C. and Grey, J. (forthcoming). Can the Epistemic Value of Natural Kinds Be Explained Independently of Their Metaphysics? British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. doi: 10.1093/bjps/axz004.
Khalidi, M. A. (1993) Carving Nature at the Joints. Philosophy of Science, 60, 100–113.
Khalidi, M. A. (1998) Natural Kinds and Crosscutting Categories. Journal of Philosophy, 95, 33–50.
Khalidi, M. A. (2013). Natural Categories and Human Kinds: Classification in the Natural and Social Sciences, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Khalidi, M. A. (2016). Mind-Dependent Kinds. Journal of Social Ontology, 2, 223–246.
Khalidi, M. A. (2018). Natural Kinds as Nodes in Causal Networks. Synthese, 195, 1379–1396.
Kim, J. (1992). Multiple Realization and the Metaphysics of Reduction. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 52, 1–26.
Kincaid, H. (1990). Molecular Biology and the Unity of Science. Philosophy of Science, 57, 575–93.
Kistler, M. (2018). Natural Kinds, Causal Profile, and Multiple Constitution. Metaphysica, 19, 113–135.
Kitcher, P. (1981). Explanatory Unification. Philosophy of Science, 48, 507–531.
Knox, E. (2016). Abstraction and its Limits: Finding Space For Novel Explanation. Noûs, 50, 41–60.
Kornblith, H. (1993). Inductive Inference and Its Natural Ground, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kripke, S. A. (1980). Naming and Necessity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ladyman, J., Ross, D., Spurrett, D., and Collier, J. (2007). Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lange, M. (2004). The Autonomy of Functional Biology: A Reply to Rosenberg. Biology and Philosophy, 19, 93–109.
Lange, M. (2009). Laws and Lawmakers, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LaPorte, J. (2004). Natural Kinds and Conceptual Change, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Le Poidevin, R. (2005). Missing Elements and Missing Premises: A Combinatorial Argument for the Ontological Reduction of Chemistry. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 56, 117–134.
Lewis, D. (1983). New Work for a Theory of Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 61, 343–377.
Llored, J.-P. (2012). Emergence and Quantum Chemistry. Foundations of Chemistry, 14, 245–274.
Lowe, E. J. (1989). What Is a Criterion of Identity? Philosophical Quarterly, 39, 1–21.
Lowe, E. J. (2006). The Four-Category Ontology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lowe, E. J. (2008). Two Notions of Being: Entity and Essence. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 62, 23–48.
Lowe, E. J. (2015). In Defence of Substantial Universals. In Galluzzo, G. and Loux, M. J., eds., The Problem of Universals in Contemporary Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 65–84.
Magnus, P. D. (2012). Scientific Enquiry and Natural Kinds: From Planets to Mallards, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Mill, J. S. (1843 /1882). A System of Logic (8th ed.), New York: Harper & Brothers.
Millikan, R. (1999). Historical Kinds and the ‘Special Sciences’. Philosophical Studies, 95, 45–65.
Mitchell, S. (2002). Integrative Pluralism. Biology and Philosophy, 17, 55–70.
Mitchell, S. (2003). Biological Complexity and Integrative Pluralism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Morrison, M. (2000). Unifying Scientific Theories: Physical Concepts and Mathematical Structures, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nagel, E. (1961). The Structure of Science: Problems in the Logic of Scientific Explanation, New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
Nathan, M. (2017). Unificatory Explanation. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68, 163–186.
Needham, P. (2008). Is Water a Mixture? Bridging the Distinction Between Physical and Chemical Properties. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 39, 66–77.
Needham, P. (2010). Nagel’s Analysis of Reduction: Comments in Defence as Well as Critique. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics Part B, 41, 163–170.
Needham, P. (2011). Microessentialism: What Is the Argument? Noûs, 45, 1–21.
Nesse, W. D. (2011). Introduction to Mineralogy, 2nd ed., Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Ney, A. (2010). Convergence on the Problem of Mental Causation: Shoemaker’s Strategy for (Nonreductive?) Physicalists. Philosophical Issues, 20, 438–445.
Okasha, S., (2002). Darwinian Metaphysics: Species and the Question of Essentialism. Synthese 131, 191–213.
Oppenheim, P. and Putnam, H. (1958). Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 2, 3–36.
Patrick, K. (2018). Unity as an Epistemic Virtue. Erkenntnis 83, 983–1002.
Polger, T. W. and Shapiro, L. A. (2016). The Multiple Realization Book, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Putnam, H. (1967). Psychological Predicates. In Capitan, W. H. and Merrill, D. D., eds., Art, Mind, and Religion, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Reprinted as The Nature of Mental States, in Ned Block, ed., Readings in Philosophy of Psychology, vol. 1, Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1980.
Putnam, H. (1975). Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Papers, vol. 2, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenberg, A. (1985). The Structure of Biological Science, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenberg, A. (1994). Instrumental Biology, or the Disunity of Science, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rosenberg, A. (2006). Darwinian Reductionism, or, How to Stop Worrying and Love Molecular Biology, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Schickore, J. (2008). Doing Science, Writing Science. Philosophy of Science, 75, 323–343.
Seifert, V. (2017). An Alternative Approach to Unifying Chemistry with Quantum Mechanics. Foundations of Chemistry, 19, 209–222.
Seifert, V. (2019). Reduction and Emergence in Chemistry. The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy. www.iep.utm.edu/red-chem/. Sidelle, A. (2009). Conventionalism and the Contingency of Conventions. Noûs, 43, 224–241.
Sider, T. (2011). Writing the Book of the World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Slater, M. H. (2009). Macromolecular Pluralism. Philosophy of Science, 76, 851–863.
Slater, M. H. (2015). Natural Kindness. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 66, 375–411.
Stanford, P. K. and Kitcher, P. (2000). Refining the Causal Theory of Reference for Natural Kind Terms. Philosophical Studies, 97, 99–129.
Strevens, M. (2012). The Explanatory Role of Irreducible Properties. Noûs, 46, 754–780.
Symons, J., Pombo, O., and Torres, J. M. (eds). (2011). Otto Neurath and the Unity of Science, Dordrecht: Springer.
Tahko, T. E. (2012). Boundaries in Reality. Ratio, 25, 405–424.
Tahko, T. E. (2015a). An Introduction to Metametaphysics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tahko, T. E. (2015b). Natural Kind Essentialism Revisited. Mind, 124, 795–822.
Tahko, T. E. (2015c). The Modal Status of Laws: In Defence of a Hybrid View. Philosophical Quarterly, 65, 509–528.
Tahko, T. E. (2020). Where Do You Get Your Protein? Or: Biochemical Realization. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 71, 799–825.
Tobin, E. (2010a). Crosscutting Natural Kinds and the Hierarchy Thesis. In Beebee, H. and Sabbarton-Leary, N., eds., The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds, London: Routledge, pp. 179–191.
Tobin, E. (2010b). Microstructuralism and Macromolecules: The Case of Moonlighting Proteins. Foundations of Chemistry, 12, 41–54.
Tobin, E. (2013). Are Natural Kinds and Natural Properties Distinct? In Mumford, S and Tugby, M, eds., Metaphysics and Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 164–182.
van Brakel, J. (1986). The Chemistry of Substances and the Philosophy of Mass Terms, Synthese, 69, 291–324.
van Brakel, J. (2010). Chemistry and Physics: No Need for Metaphysical Glue. Foundations of Chemistry, 12, 123–136.
VanDeWall, H. (2007). Why Water Is Not H2O, and Other Critiques of Essentialist Ontology from the Philosophy of Chemistry. Philosophy of Science, 74, 906–919.
van Riel, R. (2011). Nagelian Reduction beyond the Nagel Model. Philosophy of Science, 78, 353–375.
van Riel, R. (2014). The Concept of Reduction, Dordrecht: Springer.
Waters, C. K. (2016). No General Structure. In Slater, M. and Yudell, Z., eds., Metaphysics in Philosophy of Science, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 81–108.
Williams, N. (2011). Putnam’s Traditional Neo-Essentialism. Philosophical Quarterly, 61, 151–170.
Wilson, J. (2010). Non-reductive Physicalism and Degrees of Freedom. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61, 279–311.
Wilson, J. (2011). Non-reductive Realization and the Powers-Based Subset Strategy. The Monist, 94, 121–154.
Wilson, J. (2015). Metaphysical Emergence: Weak and Strong. In Bigaj, T. and Wüthrich, C., eds., Metaphysics in Contemporary Physics, Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Leiden and Boston: Brill/Rodopi, pp. 345–402.
Wilson, J. (forthcoming). Metaphysical Emergence, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wimsatt, W. (1987). False Models as Means to Truer Theories. In Nitecki, M. H. and Hoffman, A., eds., Neutral Models in Biology, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 23–55.
