Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
  1. Home
  2. Books
  3. Vietnam
  • Cited by 44
      • Show more authors
      • You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Select format
    • Publisher:
      Cambridge University Press
      Publication date:
      04 February 2019
      07 February 2019
      ISBN:
      9781108608312
      9781108459075
      DOI:
      https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108608312
      Dimensions:
      Weight & Pages:
      Dimensions:
      (229 x 152 mm)
      Weight & Pages:
      0.14kg, 86 Pages
      • Series:
      Elements in Politics and Society in Southeast Asia
      Subjects:
      Area Studies, Asian Studies, South-East Asian Government, Politics and Policy, Politics and International Relations
    You may already have access via personal or institutional login
    • Selected: Digital
    Add to cart View cart Buy from Cambridge.org
    Series:
    Elements in Politics and Society in Southeast Asia
    Subjects:
    Area Studies, Asian Studies, South-East Asian Government, Politics and Policy, Politics and International Relations
    Information

    Book description

    This is a study of Vietnam's socialist transition and state transformation, generally known as đổi mới. It examines the drivers of socialist-regime change, the nature of the đổi mới state, and the basis of regime legitimacy in Vietnam. The Element argues that despite its 'one-party rule' label, the party-state apparatus that channels said rule has become fragmented. State-building during the đổi mới period involved negotiations and bargaining that redefine authority and power relations within the state apparatus. The party-state's accountability projects are designed to target the specific self-aggrandizing tendencies of the state apparatus, its policies, and abuse of state power. At the leadership level, patterns of resource allocation underlying the đổi mới growth model as well as the VCP's cadre rotation approach have accommodated central and sub-national state elites across sectors and levels, helping shore up the legitimacy of the đổi mới state in the eyes of the state elite. The combination of sustained economic growth, expansion of political space, accountability, and tolerance of small-scale public protests have been factors in strengthening regime-society legitimization.

    References

    References

    “Bí thư Tỉnh ủy Kim Ngọc – Một con người đổi mới và sáng tạo” [Party Secretary Kim Ngoc – A Reformist and Innovative Figure], Nhân Dân Điện Tử (October 3, 2018).
    “Biển miền Trung đã trở lại bình thường sau sự cố Formosa” [Central Vietnam’s Coast Returns to Normal after the Formosa Disaster], Người Lao Động (May 17, 2018).
    “Chuyện ‘khoán chui’ ở Vĩnh Phúc thời Bí thư Kim Ngọc” [The Story about ‘Hidden Sub-Contracting’ in Vinh Phuc under Party Secretary Kim Ngọc’s Time], Dân Việt (September 15, 2017).
    “Đầu tư công – thực trạng và giải pháp” [Public Investment: Situation and Solutions], Kiểm toán Nhà nước Việt Nam (August 8, 2012).
    “Đây là lý do 13 tỉnh thành này, đặc biệt là TPHCM phải ‘gánh hộ’ ngân sách cho các địa phương còn lại” [These Are Reasons Why 13 Provinces, Especially Ho Chi Minh City, Have to Bear the Budget Burden for the Remaining Provinces!], CAFEF (October 14, 2016).
    “Dự án Sào Khê đội vốn 36 lần: Đã yêu cầu lãnh đạo tỉnh Ninh Bình báo cáo” [The Sao Khe Project Raised Capital 36 Times: Ninh Binh Leadership Asked to Report the Situation], Báo Mới (June 3, 2018).
    “Dự án Sào Khê từ 72 tỷ “vọt” lên 2,595 tỷ đồng: Bí thư Tỉnh ủy Ninh Bình nói gì?” [The Sao Khe Project from VND 72 billion to 2,595 billion: What Did Ninh Binh Party Secretary Say?], VTC News (May 23, 2018).
    “Giảm đầu mối nhưng thực chất lại tăng số Cục, Vụ thuộc Bộ” [Reduced Number of Contact Points, but a Larger Number of Bureaus and Departments within Ministries], VOV (August 7, 2017).
    “Hành trình tách nhập tỉnh, thành” [Roadmap for the Split and Merger of Provinces and Cities], Vietnamnet (September 7, 2017).
    “Lại bàn về đầu tư công” [Re-Discuss Public Investment], Kinh tế Sài Gòn Online (August 12, 2011).
    “Nhiều bộ có số lượng thứ trưởng vượt tiêu chuẩn” [Many Ministries Have More Deputy Ministers Than Standardized], Báo Đất Việt (October 17, 2017).
    “Nhìn lại việc ‘trải thảm đỏ đón nhà đầu tư’” [Reviewing the ‘Rolling out the Red Carpet to Welcome Investors’ Practice], Tin tức (January 31, 2013).
    “Thanh tra kết luận nhiều dự án ‘đội vốn’ở Hải Phòng” [The Inspectorate Concluded that Many Projects in Hai Phong Had Raised Capital], VNExpress (July 17, 2018).
    “UBND TP.HCM đã điều chỉnh quy hoạch Thủ Thiêm như thế nào?” [How Did the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee Adjust the Thu Thiem Project’s Spatial Plan?], Thanh Niên (May 4, 2018).
    “Vietnam Energy Executives Stand Trial on Corruption Charges,” BBC News (January 8, 2018).
    Anderson, Benedict R. O’G. (1983). Old State, New Society: Indonesia’s New Order in Comparative Historical Perspective. Journal of Asian Studies, 42 (3), 477–96.
    Beresford, Melanie & Fforde, Adam (1997). A Methodology for Analysing the Process of Economic Reform in Vietnam: The Case of Domestic Trade. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 13(4), 99–128.
    Beresford, Melanie & Ngoc, Tran, Angie, , eds. (2004). Reaching for the Dream: Challenges of Sustainable Development in Vietnam. Singapore: ISEAS.
    Beresford, Melanie (1988). Vietnam: Politics, Economics and Society. London and New York: Pinter Publishers.
    Beresford, Melanie (1989). National Unification and Economic Development in Vietnam. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Bland, Ben. “Vinashin Executives Go on Trial in Vietnam.” Financial Times (March 27, 2012).
    Bộ Nội Vụ (2018). Báo cáo chỉ số Cải cách Hành chính – PAR Index 2017 [Report on Indicators on Public Administration Reform – PAR Index 2017].
    Bộ Nội Vụ, Mặt trận Tổ quốc Việt Nam, Hội Cựu chiến bình Việt Nam (2018). Báo cáo chỉ số hài lòng của người dân, tổ chức đối với sự phục vụ của cơ quan hành chính nhà nước năm 2017 [Report on Indicators on Satisfaction of Citizens and Organizations Regarding the Services of State Management Agencies in 2017 – SIPAS 2017].
    Tin, Bui (1995). Following Ho Chi Minh: The Memoirs of a North Vietnamese Colonel. Trans. Judy Stowe and Do Van. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
    Chan, Anita & Norlund, Irene (1999). Vietnamese and Chinese Labor Regimes: On the Road to Divergence. In Chan, Anita, Benedict, J. Kerkvliet, Tria, and Unger, Jonathan, eds., Transforming Asian Socialism: China and Vietnam Compared. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 204–29.
    Châu Hoàng Thân. “Đặc điểm, yêu cầu và thực trạng phân cấp quản lý đất đai hiện nay” [Features, Needs, and Current Situations of Land Management Decentralization]. 26 April 2018. Available at: http://tuphaptamky.gov.vn/2014/news/sua-luat-dat-dai-2013/Dac-diem-yeu-cau-va-thuc-trang-phan-cap-quan-ly-dat-dai-hien-nay-3700.html
    Chiến lược ổn định và phát triển kinh tế xã hội đến năm 2000 [Strategy for Socio-Economic Stability and Development to 2000].
    Văn Lâm, Chử (1990). 45 năm nông nghiệp Việt Nam [45 Years of Vietnamese Agriculture]. In Viện Kinh tế học, 45 năm kinh tế Việt Nam (1945–1990) [45 Years of the Vietnamese Economy (1945–1990)]. Hà Nội: Khoa học Xã hội, pp. 94–115.
    CODE & PPWG (2008). Tài liệu hội thảo sự tham gia của tổ chức phi chính phủ và tổ chức cộng đồng trong vận động chính sách: Kinh nghiệm thực tiễn và khuôn khổ pháp luật [Materials on Cooperation]. Hà Nội: SDC.
    CODE (2008). Vận động chính sách: Thực tiễn và pháp luật [Policy Advocacy: Practice and Laws]. Hà Nội: Lao Động – Xã hội.
    Cương lĩnh xây dựng đất nước trong thời kỳ quá độ lên chủ nghĩa xã hội [Program on the Building of the Country during the Transition to Socialism].
    Cộng, Đảng Việt Nam, sản (2016). Văn kiện Đại hội Đại biểu toàn quốc lần thứ XII [Documents from the Twelfth National Party Congress]. Hà Nội: VP Trung ương Đảng.
    Hùng Võ, Đặng (2012). Phân cấp quyền của Nhà nước đối với đất đai, quản lý đất đai và việc giám sát – đánh giá cần thiết ở Việt Nam [Decentralization of the State Regarding Land, Land Management, and Necessary Monitoring and Supervision in Vietnam]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2012 [Proceedings from the Fall 2012 Economic Forum], Vũng Tàu, September 28–29, 2012.
    Phong, Dang & Beresford, Melanie (1998). Authority Relations and Economic Decision-Making in Vietnam: A Historical Perspective. Copenhagen: NIAS Press.
    Phong, Đặng (2009a). “Phá rào” trong kinh tế vào đêm trước đổi mới [“Fence-Breaking” in the Economy the Night before Đổi Mới]. Hà Nội: Tri thức.
    Phong, Đặng (2009b). Tư duy kinh tế Việt Nam 1975–1989 (Nhật ký thời bao cấp) [Vietnamese Economic Thinking 1975–1989 (A Memoir from the State Subsidy Era)]. Hà Nội: Tri thức.
    Dapice, David (2008). Choosing Success: The Lessons of East and Southeast Asia and Vietnam’s Future: A Policy Framework for Vietnam’s Socioeconomic Development, 2011–2020. Asia Programs, John. F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.
    Davidsen, Søren et al. (2007). Implementation Assessment of the Anti-Corruption Law: How Far Has Vietnam Come? Report prepared for the First Anti-Corruption Dialogue, Hanoi, Vietnam.
    Thế Huynh, Đinh et al. (2015). 30 năm đổi mới và phát triển ở Việt Nam [30 Years of Renewal and Development]. Hà Nội: Chính trị Quốc gia.
    Chung, Do Kim, Le, Nguyen Phuong, & Van Duy, Luu (2015). Implementation of Poverty Reduction Policies: An Analysis of National Targeted Program for Poverty Reduction in the Northwest Region of Vietnam. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 9(1), 76–86.
    Duiker, William J. (1989). Vietnam Since the Fall of Saigon (Updated Edition). Athens, OH: Ohio University Center for International Studies.
    Elliott, David (1992). Vietnam’s 1991 Party Elections. Asian Affairs, 19(3), 159–69.
    Fforde, Adam & Homutova, Lada (2017). Political Authority in Vietnam: Is the VCP a Paper Leviathan? Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 36 (3), 91–118.
    Fforde, Adam & Paine, Susanne (1987). The Limits of National Liberation: Problems of Economic Management in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. London: Croom Helm.
    Fforde, Adam (2004). State Owned Enterprises, Law, and a Decade of Market-Oriented Socialist Development in Vietnam. SEARC Working Paper Series, Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
    Fforde, Adam, & de Vylder, Stefan (1996). From Plan to Market: The Economic Transition in Vietnam. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
    Fforde, Adam & Goldstone, Anthony (1995). Vietnam to 2005: Advancing on All Fronts. London: The Economist Intelligence Unit.
    Gainsborough, Martin (2010). Vietnam: Rethinking the State. London: Zed Books.
    Greenfield, Gerard (1994). The Development of Capitalism in Vietnam. In Ralph Miliband, ed., Socialist Register 30, 204–34.
    Hansen, Henrik, Rand, John, & Tarp, Finn (2009). Enterprise Growth and Survival in Vietnam: Does Government Support Matter? The Journal of Development Studies, 45(7), 1048–69.
    Hoan, Hoàng Văn (1986). Giọt nước trong biển cả [Drops of Water in the Ocean]. Available at: http://lmvn.com/truyen/?func=viewpost&id=diQBlL91SLDTD6TrnXr8pqPRahWde4k9
    Houtart, Francois & Lemercinier, Genevieve (1984). Hai Van: Life in a Vietnamese Commune. London: Zed Books.
    Đức, Huy (2012). Bên thắng cuộc, quyền I và II [The Winning Side, 2 vols.] Available at: www.vinadia.org/ben-thang-cuoc-huy-duc-quyen-i-giai-phong/; and www.vinadia.org/ben-thang-cuoc-huy-duc-quyen-ii-quyen-binh/
    Khanh, Huynh Kim (1982). Vietnamese Communism 1925–1945. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
    IFC et al. (2011). Cải cách quy trình và thủ tục hành chính và đầu tư, đất đai và xây dựng [Reform of the Process and Administrative Procedures for Investment, Land, and Construction]. Hà Nội: Lao Động.
    Kahin, George (1986). Intervention: How America Became Involved in Vietnam. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
    Kerkvliet, Ben, Heng, Russell, & Koh, David, eds. (2003). Getting Organized in Vietnam: Moving in and around the Socialist State. Singapore: ISEAS.
    Kerkvliet, Benedict & Marr, David G, eds. (2004). Beyond Hanoi: Local Government in Vietnam. Singapore: ISEAS.
    Kerkvliet, Benedict (2001). An Approach for Analyzing State-Society Relations in Vietnam. Sojourn, 16(2), 238–78.
    Kerkvliet, Benedict (2014). Government Repression and Toleration of Dissidents in Contemporary Vietnam. In London, Jonathan, ed., Politics in Contemporary Vietnam: Party, State, and Authority Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 100–34.
    Koh, David W. H. (2006). Wards of Hanoi. Singapore: ISEAS.
    Kornai, Janos (1992). The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. Oxford: The Clarendon Press.
    Thinh, Le Duc & Chinh, Dao Trung (2010). The Crafting of Land Tenure Policies – The Nature and Dynamic of the Actors’ Interplay in the Red River Delta. Report from the Institute of Policy and Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi.
    Thinh, Le Duc (2010). Corruption in Land Administration in Vietnam. Report from the Institute of Policy and Strategy for Agriculture and Rural Development, Hanoi.
    Thái, Lê Viết (2012). Phân cấp trong lĩnh vực quy hoạch và kế hoạch ở Việt Nam: Thực trạng và giải pháp [Decentralization in Spatial Planning and Development Planning in Vietnam: Situation and Solutions]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2012 [Proceedings from the Fall 2012 Economic Forum], Vũng Tàu, September 28–29, 2012.
    London, Jonathan D., ed. (2011). Education in Vietnam. Singapore: ISEAS.
    Malesky, E. J. & Taussig, M. (2008). Where Is Credit Due? Legal Institutions, Connections, and the Efficiency of Bank Lending in Vietnam. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 25 (June 20), 1–43.
    Mody, Ashoka, ed. (1997). Infrastructure Strategies in East Asia: The Untold Story. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
    Moise, Edwin (1993). Land Reform in Vietnam and China: Consolidating the Revolution at the Village Level. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
    MOLISA & UNDP (2004). Taking Stock, Planning Ahead: Evaluation of the National Targeted Program on Hunger Eradication and Poverty Reduction and Program 135. UNDP: Hanoi.
    Ngân hàng Thế giới (2012). Sửa đổi Luật Đất đai để thúc đầy phát triển bền vững ở Việt Nam [Revision of the Land Law to Promote Sustainable Development in Vietnam], Hà Nội: Ngân hàng Thế giới. Mại, Nguyễn (2012). Phân cấp quản lý Kinh tế và FDI [Decentralization of Economic and FDI Management]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2012 [Proceedings from the Fall 2012 Economic Forum], Vũng Tàu, September 28–29, 2012.
    Thuy, Nguyen Thi (2016). Fiscal Decentralization Trends in Vietnam: Developments and Reforms. Public Administration and Policy, 19(2), 31–41.
    Paine, Suzy (1988). The Limits of Planning and the Case for Economic Reform. In Marr, David and White, Christian Pelzer, eds. Postwar Vietnam: Dilemmas in Socialist Development. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program, pp. 91–5.
    Nghĩa, Phạm Duy (2012). Phân cấp quản lý Nhà nước trong lĩnh vực Kinh tế – Cơ sở lý luận, Thực trạng và Giải pháp [Decentralization of State Management in Economic Areas: Theoretical Basis, Situation, and Solutions]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2012 [Proceedings from the Fall 2012 Economic Forum], Vũng Tàu, September 28–29, 2012.
    Phạm Thị Thu Hằng (2014). Một số vấn đề về phát triển khu vực tư nhân [Some Problems in Private Sector Development]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2014 [Proceedings from the Fall 2014 Economic Forum], Ninh Binh, September 27–29, 2014.
    Porter, Gareth (1993). Vietnam: The Politics of Bureaucratic Socialism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
    Riedel, James & Turley, William S. (1999). The Politics and Economics of Transition to an Open Market Economy in Vietnam. OECD Development Center, Working Paper no. 152.
    Tenev, Stoyan et al. (2003). Informality and the Playing Field in Vietnam’s Business Sector. Washington, DC: World Bank and the International Finance Corporation.
    Thayer, Carlyle (2014). The Apparatus of Authoritarian Rule in Vietnam. In London, Jonathan, ed., Politics in Contemporary Vietnam: Party, State, and Authority Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 135–61.
    Thayer, Carlyle (1988). The Regularization of Politics: Continuity and Change in the Party’s Central Committee 1951–1986. In Marr, David G. & White, Christine P., eds., Postwar Vietnam: Dilemmas in Socialist Development. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program, pp. 177–93.
    Thayer, Carlyle (1994). The Vietnam People’s Army under Doi Moi. Singapore: ISEAS.
    Therborn, Goran (1978). What Does the Ruling Class Do When It Rules? State Apparatuses and State Power under Feudalism, Capitalism and Socialism. London: NLB.
    Thông báo 1483/TB-TTCP của Thanh tra Chính phủ ngày 4 tháng 9 năm 2018 về kết quả kiểm tra một số nội dung chủ yếu liên quan đến việc khiếu nại của công dân về khu đô thị mới Thủ Thiêm, thành phố Hồ Chí Minh [Government Inspectorate Report 1483/TB-TTCP dated 4 September 2018 on the results of a review of key issues related to citizen petitioning of the Thu Thiem New Urban Area in City, HCM].
    Trần Du Lịch (2014). Tái Cơ cấu Đầu tư công: Vấn đề và Giải pháp [Restructuring of Public Investment: Problems and Solutions]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2014 [Proceedings from the Fall 2014 Economic Forum], Ninh Binh, September 27–29, 2014.
    Cường, Trần Tiến (2012). Phân công, phân cấp quản lý doanh nghiệp nhà nước: Thực trạng, nguyên nhân, và một số gợi ý đổi mới [Division of Work and Management Decentralization of SOEs: Situations, Causes, and Suggestions on How to Change]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2012 [Proceedings from the Fall 2012 Economic Forum], Vũng Tàu, September 28–29, 2012.
    Chinh, Truong (1959). Resolutely Taking the North Vietnamese Countryside to Socialism through Agricultural Co-Operation. Hanoi: FLPH.
    UNDP (2017). Poverty Reduction in Vietnam. UNDP, October 17, 2017.
    Van Arkadie, Brian & Mallon, Raymond (2003). Vietnam: A Transition Tiger? Canberra: Asia Pacific Press at the Australian National University.
    Văn phòng, Quốc hội (2016). Lịch sử Quốc hội Việt Nam, Tập IV (1992–2011) [History of Vietnam’s National Assembly, Vol. IV (1992–2011)], Hà Nội: Chính trị Quốc gia Sự thật.
    Thu, Văn Tất (2007). Một số giải pháp kỹ thuật để tổ chức bộ đa ngành đa lĩnh vực [A Number of Technical Solutions for the Organization of Multi-Sectoral and Multi-Functional Ministries]. Tổ Chức Nhà Nước [State Management], (17)12, 24–7.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn & Cuong, Bui The (2008). Report on the Study on Support for an Official Mechanism for Dialogue between Vietnamese Government Agencies/ the National Assembly and Civil Society Organizations in Vietnam, A Report Prepared for the SDC, Hanoi.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn & Van, Nguyen Thai (2006). Collaboration Groups in Rural Vietnam: A Background Paper. A Report Prepared for Oxfam-Vietnam.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (1995). Vietnam: The Changing Model of Political Legitimation. In Alagappa, Muthiah, ed., Political Legitimacy in Southeast Asia. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 257–87.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (1996). Politics of Administrative Reform in Post-Socialist Vietnam. In Leung, Suiwah, ed., Vietnam Assessment: Creating a Sound Investment Climate. Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 42–68.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (1997). Sectoral Politics and Strategies for State and Party Building from the VII to the VIII Congress of the Vietnamese Communist Party (1991–1996). In Fforde, Adam, ed., Doi Moi: Ten Years after the 1986 Party Congress. Canberra: Department of Political and Social Change Monograph Series no. 24, pp. 81–135.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (1999). Rethinking the Philosophy of Central-Local Relations in Post-Central Planning Vietnam. In Turner, Mark, ed., Central-Local Government Relations in the Asia-Pacific Region. London: Macmillan, pp. 166–95.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (1999a). Vietnam: Sectors, Classes, and the Transformation of a Leninist State. In Morley, James W., ed., Driven by Growth: Political Change in the Asia-Pacific Region (revised edition). Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, pp. 58–82.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2000). Ý thức dân tộc Việt Nam trong cách nhìn so sánh [Vietnamese Nationalism from a Comparative Perspective]. In Việt Nam học: Kỷ yếu Hội thảo Quốc tế lần thứ nhất, Hà Nội, 15–17/7/1998. Hà Nội: Thế Giới, pp. 400–8.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2002). Rebuilding Authority Relations: Public Administration Reform in the Era of Doi Moi. A Report Prepared for the Asian Development Bank, Hanoi.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2003a). From Fence Breaking to Networking: Popular Organisations and Policy Influence in Post-Socialist Vietnam. In Kerkvliet, Benedict, Heng, Russell and Koh, David, eds., Getting Organised in Vietnam: Moving in and Around the Socialist State. Singapore: ISEAS, pp. 25–61.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2003b). Mapping Vietnam’s Legal Cultures: Reflections on Corruption, Organized Crime, and State Building in the Post-Socialist Era. Paper presented at the “Vietnam Legal Culture Symposium,” University of Victoria, Canada from March 27–29, 2003.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2006). Public Administration Reform and Practices of Co-Governance: Towards a Change in Governance and Governance Cultures in Vietnam. In Foundation, Heinrich Böll, ed., Active Citizens under Political Wraps: Experiences from Myanmar/Burma and Vietnam. Chiang Mai: Santipab Pack Print, pp. 143–65.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2008). Recrafting State Identity: Corruption and Anti-Corruption in Doi Moi Vietnam from a Comparative Perspective. Paper prepared for the workshop “Remaking the State,” organized by Jonathan London, City University of Hong Kong, August 21–22, 2008.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2012). Governance Arrangements in Vietnam’s Provinces: Pathways toward Inclusive Growth and Poverty Reduction. A Report Prepared for the Embassy of Norway, Hanoi.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2013). Beyond the Vietnam War: Vietnamese Socialism Today. In Brincat, Shannon, ed. Communism in the 21st Century: Whither Communism (Vol. 2). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger, pp. 135–59.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn (2014). Authoritarianism Reconfigured: Evolving Accountability Relations within Vietnam’s One-Party Rule. In London, Jonathan, ed., Politics in Contemporary Vietnam: Party, State, and Authority Relations. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, pp. 42–63.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn et al. (2009a). Analysis of Vietnam’s Current Legal Framework on People’s Councils: A Perspective from Ninh Thuan. A Report Prepared for Oxfam-Vietnam.
    Vasavakul, Thaveeporn, Viet Thai, Le, & Phi Van, Le Thi (2009). Public Administration and Economic Development in Vietnam: Remaking the Public Administration for the 21st Century, UNDP’s Public Administration Reform and Anti-Corruption: A Series of Policy Discussion Papers.
    Vickerman, Andrew (1986). The Fate of the Peasantry: Premature Transition to Socialism in the Democratic Republic of Vietnam. New Haven: Yale Southeast Asian Studies Monographs Series 24.
    Vietnam Executive Leadership Program (2012). Structural Reform for Growth, Equity, and National Sovereignty. Asia Programs, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    Vietnam Executive Leadership Program (2013). Unplugging Institutional Bottlenecks to Restore Growth. Asia Programs, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
    Vietnam Executive Leadership Program (2015). Institutional Reform: From Vision to Reality. A Policy Discussion Paper Prepared for the Vietnam Executive Leadership Program, Harvard Kennedy School.
    Cường, Vũ Sỹ (2012). Phân cấp quản lý Ngân sách nhà nước ở Việt Nam và định hướng Đổi Mới [Decentralization of the State Budget Management in Vietnam and Directions for Change]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2012 [Proceedings from the Fall 2012 Economic Forum], Vũng Tàu, September 28–29, 2012.
    Cường, Vũ Sỹ et al. (2014). Cơ chế phân bố vốn đầu tư nhà nước: Thực trạng và giải pháp thể chế [Mechanisms in Allocating Investment Capital: Situations and Institutional Solutions]. In Kỷ yếu Diễn đàn kinh tế mùa Thu năm 2014 [Proceedings from the Fall 2014 Economic Forum], Ninh Binh, September 27–29, 2014.
    Tu Anh, Vu Thanh (2016). Vietnam Decentralization amidst Fragmentation. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies, 33(2), 188–208.
    Tu Anh, Vu Thanh (2017). Does WTO Accession Help Domestic Reform?: The Political Economy of SOE Reform Backsliding in Vietnam. World Trade Review, 16(1), 85–109.
    Tu Anh, Vu Thanh, Viet Thai, Le, Tat Thang, Vo (2007). Provincial Extra-legal Investment Incentives in the Context of Decentralisation in Vietnam: Mutually Beneficial or a Race to the Bottom? Hanoi: UNDP.
    Wells-Dang, Andrew (2012). Civil Society Networks in China and Vietnam: Informal Pathbreakers in Health and the Environment. Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
    Werner, Jayne (1988). “The Problem of District in Vietnam’s Development Policy.” In Marr, David and White, Christian Pelzer, eds. Postwar Vietnam: Dilemmas in Socialist Development. Ithaca, NY: Southeast Asia Program, pp. 147–62.
    White, Christine (1981). Agrarian Reform and National Liberation in the Vietnamese Revolution: 1920–1957. Ph.D. dissertation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
    White, Christine (1985). Agricultural Planning, Pricing Policy, and Co-operatives in Vietnam. World Development, 13(1), 97–114.
    World Bank (2008). Vietnam Development Report 2009: Capital Matters. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Book summary page views

    Total views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed.

    Accessibility standard: Unknown

    Why this information is here

    This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

    Accessibility Information

    Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.