Skip to main content
×
Home
Why Dominant Parties Lose
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 56
  • Cited by
    This book has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Abdullah, Walid Jumblatt 2016. Assessing party structures: why some regimes are more authoritarian than others. Australian Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 70, Issue. 5, p. 525.


    Croke, Kevin 2016. Tools of single party hegemony in Tanzania: evidence from surveys and survey experiments. Democratization, p. 1.


    Diallo, El Hadji Samba and Kelly, Catherine Lena 2016. SufiTuruqand the politics of democratization in Senegal. Journal of Religious and Political Practice, Vol. 2, Issue. 2, p. 193.


    Escribà-Folch, Abel 2016. Foreign direct investment and the risk of regime transition in autocracies. Democratization, p. 1.


    Ferreira Do Vale, Helder 2016. Federal Political Fragmentation in Mexico's 2015 Elections. Regional & Federal Studies, Vol. 26, Issue. 1, p. 121.


    Gomez, Edmund Terence 2016. Resisting the Fall: The Single Dominant Party, Policies and Elections in Malaysia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, p. 1.


    Irak, Dağhan 2016. A Close-Knit Bunch: Political Concentration in Turkey's Anadolu Agency through Twitter Interactions. Turkish Studies, Vol. 17, Issue. 2, p. 336.


    Mantilla, Luis Felipe 2016. Church–state relations and the decline of Catholic parties in Latin America. Journal of Religious and Political Practice, Vol. 2, Issue. 2, p. 231.


    Mantilla, Luis Felipe 2016. Democratization and the secularization of religious parties: the case of Mexico. Democratization, Vol. 23, Issue. 3, p. 395.


    Schedler, Andreas and Hoffmann, Bert 2016. Communicating authoritarian elite cohesion. Democratization, Vol. 23, Issue. 1, p. 93.


    Southall, Roger 2016. From party dominance to competitive authoritarianism? South Africa versus Zimbabwe. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, Vol. 10, Issue. S1, p. 99.


    Weiss, Meredith L. 2016. Going to the ground (or AstroTurf): a grassroots view of regime resilience. Democratization, p. 1.


    Ayan Musil, Pelin 2015. Emergence of a Dominant Party System After Multipartyism: Theoretical Implications from the Case of the AKP in Turkey. South European Society and Politics, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 71.


    Escribà-Folch, Abel Meseguer, Covadonga and Wright, Joseph 2015. Remittances and Democratization. International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 59, Issue. 3, p. 571.


    Gel'man, Vladimir 2015. Political Opposition in Russia: A Troubled Transformation. Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 67, Issue. 2, p. 177.


    Gill, Graeme 2015. The Stabilization of Authoritarian Rule in Russia?. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 62.


    Kudelia, Serhiy and Kuzio, Taras 2015. Nothing personal: explaining the rise and decline of political machines in Ukraine. Post-Soviet Affairs, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 250.


    Schedler, Andreas 2015. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences.


    White, Allison C. 2015. How ethnicity matters in Russian elections: ethnic minorities and support for the United Russia party. Eurasian Geography and Economics, Vol. 56, Issue. 5, p. 524.


    Barracca, Steve and Howell, Matthew L. 2014. The Persistence of the Church-State Conflict in Mexico's Evangelical Vote: The Story of an Outlier. The Latin Americanist, Vol. 58, Issue. 2, p. 23.


    ×
  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Recommend this book

    Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this book to your organisation's collection.

    Why Dominant Parties Lose
    • Online ISBN: 9780511509803
    • Book DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511509803
    Please enter your name
    Please enter a valid email address
    Who would you like to send this to? *
    ×
  • Buy the print book

Book description

Why have dominant parties persisted in power for decades in countries spread across the globe? Why did most eventually lose? Why Dominant Parties Lose develops a theory of single-party dominance, its durability, and its breakdown into fully competitive democracy. Greene shows that dominant parties turn public resources into patronage goods to bias electoral competition in their favor and virtually win elections before election day without resorting to electoral fraud or bone-crushing repression. Opposition parties fail because their resource disadvantages force them to form as niche parties with appeals that are out of step with the average voter. When the political economy of dominance erodes, the partisan playing field becomes fairer and opposition parties can expand into catchall competitors that threaten the dominant party at the polls. Greene uses this argument to show why Mexico transformed from a dominant party authoritarian regime under PRI rule to a fully competitive democracy.

Reviews

    • Aa
    • Aa
Refine List
Actions for selected content:
Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Send to Kindle
  • Send to Dropbox
  • Send to Google Drive
  • Send content to

    To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to .

    To send content to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

    Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

    Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

    Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
    You are about to send:
    ×

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
×

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.


James Adams (1999) “Policy Divergence in Multicandidate Probabilistic Spatial VotingPublic Choice 100: 103–122.

James Adams , Merrill Samuel III, and Grofman Bernard (2005) A Unified Theory of Party Competition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

John Aldrich (1983) “A Downsian Spatial Model with Party ActivismAmerican Political Science Review 77, 4: 974–990.

John Aldrich (1993) “Rational Choice and TurnoutAmerican Journal of Political Science 37, 1: 246–278.

John Aldrich (1995) Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

John Aldrich and Bianco William (1992) “A Game-Theoretic Model of Party Affiliation of Candidates and Office HoldersMathematical and Computer Modeling 16, 8–9: 103–116.

Alberto Alesina and Spear Stephen (1988) “An Overlapping Generations Model of Electoral CompetitionJournal of Public Economics 37, 3: 359–79.

R. Michael Alvarez and Nagler Jonathan (1998) “When Politics and Model Collide: Estimating Models of Multiparty ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 42, 1 (June): 55–96.

Barry Ames (1970) “Bases of Support for Mexico's Dominant PartyAmerican Political Science Review 64, 1: 153–167.

Alan Arian and Barnes Samuel (1974) “The Dominant Party System: A Neglected Model of Democratic StabilityJournal of Politics 36, 3 (August): 592–614.

John Bailey (1988) Governing Mexico: The Statecraft of Crisis Management. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Jeffrey Banks and Kiewiet Roderick (1989) “Explaining Patterns of Candidate Competition in Congressional ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 33, 4: 997–1015.

Samuel Barnes and Pierce Roy (1971) “Public Opinion and Political Preference in France and ItalyMidwest Journal of Political Science 15, 4: 643–660.

Larry Bartels (1986) “Issue Voting Under Uncertainty: An Empirical TestAmerican Journal of Political Science 30, 4 (November): 709–728.

Thorsten Beck , Clarke George , Groff Alberto , Keefer Philip , and Walsh Patrick (2001) “New Tools in Comparative Political Economy: The Database of Political InstitutionsWorld Bank Economic Review 15 (February): 165–176.

Timothy Besley and Coate Steven (1997) “An Economic Model of Representative DemocracyQuarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1: 85–114.

Carles Boix (1998) Political Parties, Growth and Equality. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Carles Boix (2003) Democracy and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Carles Boix and Stokes Susan (2003) “Endogenous DemocratizationWorld Politics 55, 4 (July): 517–549.

David Brody and Page Benjamin (1972) “Comment: The Assessment of Policy VotingAmerican Political Science Review 66, 2 (June): 450–458.

Kathleen Bruhn (1996) “Social Spending and Political Support: The ‘Lessons’ of the National Solidarity Program in MexicoComparative Politics 28, 2: 151–177.

Bruce Cain , Ferejohn John , and Fiorina Morris (1987) The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. New York: Cambridge University Press.

John Carey and Shugart Mathew (1995) “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral FormulasElectoral Studies 14, 4: 417–439.

Thomas Carothers (2002) “The End of the Transition ParadigmJournal of Democracy 13, 1: 5–21.

William Case (2001) “Malaysia's Resilient PseudodemocracyJournal of Democracy 12, 1: 43–57.

Francis Castles and Mair Peter (1984) “Left-Right Political Scales: Some Expert JudgmentsEuropean Journal of Political Research 12, 83–88.

James Charlesworth (1948) “Is Our Two-Party System Natural?” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 259: 1–9.

Dennis Chong (2000) Rational Lives: Norms and Values in Politics and Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Peter Clark and Wilson James (1961) “Incentive Systems: A Theory of OrganizationsAdministrative Studies Quarterly 6: 129–166.

Pamela Johnston Conover and Feldman Stanley (1989) “Candidate Perception in an Ambiguous World: Campaigns, Cues, and Inference ProcessesAmerican Journal of Political Science 33, 4 (November): 912–940.

Albert Cover and Brumberg Bruce (1982) “Baby Books and Ballots: The Impact of Congressional Mail on Constituent OpinionAmerican Political Science Review 76, 2: 347–359.

Gary Cox (1987) “The Uncovered Set and the CoreAmerican Journal of Political Science 31, 2: 408–422.

Gary Cox (1990) “Centripetal and Centrifugal Incentives in Electoral SystemsAmerican Journal of Political Science 34, 4 (November): 903–935.

Gary Cox (1996) “Is the Single Nontransferable Vote Superproportional: Evidence from Japan and TaiwanAmerican Journal of Political Science 40, 3 (August): 740–755.

Gary Cox (1997) Making Votes Count. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Robert Dahl (1992) “Why Free Markets Are Not EnoughJournal of Democracy 3, 3 (July): 82–89.

Otto Davis , Hinich Melvin , and Ordeshook Peter (1970) “An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral ProcessAmerican Political Science Review 64: 426–448.

Klaus Deininger and Squire Lyn (1996) “A New Data Set Measuring Income InequalityWorld Bank Economic Review 10, 3: 565–591.

Larry Diamond (2002) “Thinking about Hybrid RegimesJournal of Democracy 13, 2 (April): 21–35.

Jay Dow and Endersby James (2004) “Multinomial Probit and Multinomial Logit: A Comparison of Choice Models for Voting ResearchElectoral Studies 23: 107–122.

William Ebenstein (1945) “Public Administration in MexicoPublic Administration Review 5, 2 (Spring): 102–112.

James Enelow and Hinich Melvin (1982) “Nonspatial Candidate Characteristics and Electoral CompetitionJournal of Politics 44: 115–130.

Timothy Feddersen , Sened Itai , and Wright Stephen (1990) “Rational Voting and Candidate Entry under Plurality RuleAmerican Journal of Political Science 34, 4: 1005–1016.

Russell Fitzgibbon (1951) “Measurement of Latin-American Political Phenomena: A Statistical ExperimentAmerican Political Science Review 45, 2 (June): 517–523.

Barbara Geddes (1999a) “What Do We Know About Democratization After Twenty Years?” Annual Review of Political Science 2: 115–144.

Barbara Geddes (2003) Paradigms and Sand Castles: Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Terri Givens (2005) Voting Radical Right in Western Europe. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Miriam Golden (2004) “International Economic Sources of Regime Change: How European Integration Undermined Italy's Postwar Party SystemComparative Political Studies 37, 10 (December): 1238–1274.

Gomez, Edmund (2002) “Political Business in Malaysia: Party Factionalism, Corporate Development, and Economic Crisis” in E. Gomez (ed.) Political Business in Asia. New York: Routledge.

Jay Goodliffe (2001) “The Effect of War Chests on Challenger Entry in U.S. House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 45, 4: 830–844.

Donald Green and Krasno Jonathan (1988) “Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House ElectionsAmerican Journal of Political Science 32, 4: 884–907.

Joseph Greenberg and Shepsle Kenneth (1987) “The Effects of Electoral Rewards in Multiparty Competition with EntryAmerican Political Science Review 81: 525–537.

Kenneth F. Greene (2002a) “Opposition Party Strategy and Spatial Competition in Dominant Party Regimes: A Theory and the Case of MexicoComparative Political Studies 35, 7 (September): 755–783.

Tim Groseclose (2001) “A Model of Candidate Location When One Candidate Has a Valence AdvantageAmerican Journal of Political Science 45, 4 (October): 862–886.

Melvin Hinich and Munger Michael (1997) Analytical Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Marc Howard and Roessler Phillip (2006) “Liberalizing Electoral Outcomes in Competitive Authoritarian RegimesAmerican Journal of Political Science 50, 2 (April): 365–381.

John Fuh-sheng Hsieh , Lacy Dean , and Niou Emerson (1998) “Retrospective and prospective voting in a one-party-dominant democracy: Taiwan's 1996 presidential electionPublic Choice 97: 383–399.

Simon Hug (2001) Altering Party Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Kenneth Johnson (1965) “Ideological Correlates of Right Wing Political Alienation in MexicoAmerican Political Science Review 59, 3 (September): 656–664.

Mark Jones and Mainwaring Scott (2003) “The Nationalization of Parties and Party Systems: An Empirical Measure and an Application to the AmericasParty Politics 9 (March): 139–166.

Richard Katz and Mair Peter (1995) “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel PartyParty Politics 1, 1: 5–28.

V. O. Key (1966) The Responsible Electorate: Rationality in Presidential Voting, 1936–1960. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

Gary King , Tomz Michael , and Wittenberg Jason (2000) “Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Interpretation and PresentationAmerican Journal of Political Science 44, 2 (April): 347–61.

Kirchheimer, Otto (1966) “The Transformation of West European Party Systems” in J. LaPalambara and M. Weiner (eds.) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Herbert Kitschelt (1989b) “The Internal Politics of Parties: The Law of Curvilinear Disparity RevisitedPolitical Studies 37, 3: 400–421.

Herbert Kitschelt (1994) The Transformation of European Social Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Herbert Kitschelt (2000) “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic PolitiesComparative Political Studies 33, 6/7 (August/September): 845–879.

Herbert Kitschelt and Wilkinson Steve (eds.) (2007) Patrons, Clients and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kenneth Kollman , Miller John , and Page Scott (1992) “Adaptive Parties in Spatial ElectionsAmerican Political Science Review 86, 4: 929–937.

Timur Kuran (1991) “Now out of Never: The Element of Surprise in the East European Revolution of 1989World Politics 44 (October): 7–48.

Joy Langston (2001) “Why Rules Matter: Changes in Candidate Selection in Mexico's PRI, 1988–2000Journal of Latin American Studies 33: 485–511.

Joseph LaPalombara (1964) Interest Groups in Italian Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Fabrice Lehoucq (2003) “Electoral Fraud: Causes, Types, and ConsequencesAnnual Review of Political Science 6: 233–256.

Ariel Levite and Tarrow Sydney (1983) “The Legitimation of Excluded Parties in Dominant Party Systems: A Comparison of Israel and ItalyComparative Politics 15, 3 (April): 295–327.

Steven Levitsky (2003) Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Steven Levitsky and Way Lucan (2002) “The Rise of Competitive AuthoritarianismJournal of Democracy 13, 2: 51–65.

Steven Levitt and Wolfram Catherine (1997) “Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. HouseLegislative Studies Quarterly 22: 45–60.

Mark Lichbach (1996) The Cooperator's Dilemma. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Tse-min Lin , Enelow James , and Dorussen Han (1999) “Equilibrium in Multicandidate Probabilistic VotingPublic Choice 98: 59–82.

Leslie Lipson (1953) “The Two–Party System in British PoliticsAmerican Political Science Review 47: 337–358.

Beatriz Magaloni (2006) Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and its Demise in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Peter Mair and Ingrid Biezen (2001) “Party Membership in Twenty European Democracies, 1980–2000Party Politics 7, 1: 5–21.

John May (1973) “Opinion Structures and Political Parties: The Special Law of Curvilinear DisparityPolitical Studies 21: 135–151.

James McCann and Lawson Chappell . 2003. “An Electorate Adrift? Public Opinion and the Quality of Democracy in MexicoLatin American Research Review 38, 3 (October): 60–81.

Richard McKelvey (1986) “Covering, Dominance, and Institution–Free Properties of Social ChoiceAmerican Journal of Political Science 30, 2: 283–314.

Gordon Paul Means (1996) “Soft Authoritarianism in Malaysia and SingaporeJournal of Democracy 7, 4 (October): 103–117.

Bonnie Meguid (2005) “Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy in Niche Party SuccessAmerican Political Science Review 99, 3 (August): 347–359.

Warren Miller and Stokes Donald (1963) “Constituency influence in CongressAmerican Political Science Review 57 (March): 45–56.

Anne Munro-Kua (1996) Authoritarian Populism in Malaysia. London: MacMillan.

Emerson Niou and Ordeshook Peter (1992) “A Game Theoretic Analysis of the Republic of China's Emerging Electoral SystemInternational Political Science Review 13, 1: 59–79.

Martin Osborne and Slivinski Al (1996) “A Model of Political Competition with Citizen–CandidatesQuarterly Journal of Economics 111, 1: 65–96.

Thomas Palfrey (1984) “Spatial Equilibrium with EntryReview of Economic Studies 51, 1: 139–156.

Edward Prescott and Visscher Michael (1977) “Sequential Location among Firms with ForesightBell Journal of Economics 8: 378–393.

Adam Przeworski , Alvarez Michael , Cheibub José , and Limongi Fernando (2000) Democracy and Development. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Robert Putnam (1971) “Studying Elite Political Culture: The Case of ‘Ideology’American Political Science Review 65, 3 (September): 651–681.

V. V. Ramanadham (ed.) (1995) Privatization and Equity. New York: Routledge.

Steven Reed and Scheiner Ethan (2003) “Electoral Incentives and Policy Preferences: Mixed Motives Behind Party Defections in JapanBritish Journal of Political Science 33: 469–490.

Shelley Rigger (2001b) “The Democratic Progressive Party in 2000: Obstacles and OpportunitiesChina Quarterly 168: 944–959.

William Riker (1976) “The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger's LawComparative Politics 9, 1: 93–106.

Marco Rimanelli (1999) Comparative Democratization and Peaceful Change in Single-Party-Dominant Countries. New York: St. Martin's Press.

David Rohde (1979) “Risk-bearing and Progressive Ambition: The Case of the United States House of RepresentativesAmerican Journal of Political Science 23 (February), 1–26.

Michael Ross (2001) “Does Oil Hinder Democracy?” World Politics 53, 3 (April): 325–361.

David Samuels (2002) “Presidentialized Parties: The Separation of Power and Party Organization and BehaviorComparative Political Studies 35, 4 (May): 461–483.

Andreas Schedler (2002) “The Menu of ManipulationJournal of Democracy 13, 2 (April): 36–50.

Martin Shefter (1977b) “Party and Patronage: Germany, England, and ItalyPolitics and Society 7: 403–451.

Theda Skocpol and Somers Margaret (1980) “The Uses of Comparative History in Macrosocial InquiryComparative Studies in Society and History 22: 174–197.

Benjamin Smith (2005) “Life of the Party: The Origins of Regime Breakdown and Persistence under Single-Party RuleWorld Politics 57 (April): 421–451.

James Snyder (1994) “Safe Seats, Marginal Seats, and Party Platforms: The Logic of Platform DifferentiationEconomics and Politics 6: 201–214.

Richard Snyder (2001) Politics after Neoliberalism: Reregulation in Mexico. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Debra Solinger (2001) “Ending One-Party Dominance: Korea, Taiwan, MexicoJournal of Democracy 12, 1: 30–42.

Frederic Spotts and Wieser Theodor (1986) Italy: A Difficult Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Susan Stokes (2001) Mandates and Democracy: Neoliberalism by Surprise in Latin America. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Walter Stone , Maisel Sandy , and Maestas Cherie (2004) “Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent DeterrenceAmerican Journal of Political Science 48, 3 (July): 479–495.

Yik Koon Teh (2002) “Money Politics in MalaysiaJournal of Contemporary Asia 32, 3: 338–345.

Tien, Hung-mao and Tun-jen Cheng (1999) “Crafting Democratic Institutions” in S. Tsang and H. Tien (eds.) Democratization in Taiwan: Implications for China. New York: St. Martin's Press.

Robert Tucker (1961) “Towards a Comparative Politics of Movement-RegimesAmerican Political Science Review 55, 2 (June): 281–289.

Robert Tucker (1965) “The Dictator and TotalitarianismWorld Politics 17, 4: 555–583.

Gordon Tullock (1971) “The Paradox of RevolutionPublic Choice 11 (Fall): 89–99.

Donald Wittman (1983) “Candidate Motivation: A Synthesis of Alternative TheoriesAmerican Political Science Review 77, 1: 142–157.

Dianqing Xu (1997) “The KMT Party's Enterprises in TaiwanModern Asian Studies 31, 2: 399–413.

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 242 *
Loading metrics...

Book summary page views

Total views: 247 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd July 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.