Element contents
Series: Elements in Organization Theory
Ambiguity in Organization Theory
From Intrinsic to Strategic Perspectives
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 12 January 2023
Summary
This Element presents and discusses the main trajectories in the evolution of the concept of ambiguity and the most relevant theoretical contributions developed around it. It specifically elaborates on both the intrinsic perspectives on ambiguity as an inherent part of organizational decision-making processes and the more recent strategic perspectives on discursively constructed strategic ambiguity. It helps illuminate the path ahead of organizational scholars and offers new avenues for future research. This is important given the ever more pervasive presence of ambiguity in and around organizations and societies.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Organization TheoryOnline ISBN: 9781009358460Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 02 February 2023
References
Abdallah, C. and Langley, A. (2014). The double edge of ambiguity in strategic planning. Journal of Management Studies 51(2): 235–264.Google Scholar
Adler, P. S. (1995). Interdepartmental interdependence and coordination: The case of the design/manufacturing interface. Organization Science 6(2): 147–167.Google Scholar
Aggerholm, H. K., Asmuß, B. and Thomsen, C. (2012). The role of recontextualization in the multivocal, ambiguous process of strategizing. Journal of Management Inquiry 21(4): 413–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, L. E. (1958). Toward more clarity in business communications by modern logical methods. Management Science 5(1): 121–135.Google Scholar
Altomonte, G. (2020). Exploiting ambiguity: A moral polysemy approach to variation in economic practices. American Sociological Review 85(1): 76–105.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. (1993). Organizations as rhetoric: Knowledge‐intensive firms and the struggle with ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies 30(6): 997–1015.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. (2001). Knowledge work: Ambiguity, image and identity. Human Relations 54(7): 863–886.Google Scholar
Alvesson, M. and Sveningsson, S. (2003). Good visions, bad micro-management and ugly ambiguity: Contradictions of (non-) leadership in a knowledge-intensive organization. Organization Studies 24(6): 961–988.Google Scholar
Ambrosini, V. and Bowman, C. (2010). The impact of causal ambiguity on competitive advantage and rent appropriation. British Journal of Management 21(4): 939–953.Google Scholar
Augustine, G., Soderstrom, S., Milner, D. and Weber, K. (2019). Constructing a distant future: Imaginaries in geoengineering. Academy of Management Journal 62(6): 1930–1960.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1984). Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1982). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin, University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management 17(1): 99–120.Google Scholar
Bartel, C. A. and Wiesenfeld, B. M. (2013). The social negotiation of group prototype ambiguity in dynamic organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review 38(4): 503–524.Google Scholar
Barthes, R. (1977). Image Music Text. Essays selected and translated by Heath, S.. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Beckman, C. M. (2021). Alternatives and complements to rationality. In Beckman, C.M. (Ed.), Carnegie goes to California: Advancing and celebrating the work of James G. March (pp. 3–18). Bingley, Emerald.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belova, O., King, I. and Sliwa, M. (2008). Introduction: Polyphony and organization studies: Mikhail Bakhtin and beyond. Organization Studies 29(4): 493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benders, J. and Van Veen, K. (2001). What’s in a fashion? Interpretative viability and management fashions. Organization 8(1): 33–53.Google Scholar
Boghossian, J. and David, R. J. (2021). Under the umbrella: Goal-derived category construction and product category nesting. Administrative Science Quarterly. 66(4), 1084–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392211012376.Google Scholar
Boulongne, R. and Durand, R. (2021). Evaluating ambiguous offerings. Organization Science 32(2): 257–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boxenbaum, E., Jones, C., Meyer, R. E. and Svejenova, S. (2018). Towards an articulation of the material and visual turn in organization studies. Organization Studies 39(5–6), 597–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840618772611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyd, B. K., Bergh, D. D. and Ketchen, D. J. (2010). Reconsidering the reputation – Performance relationship: A resource-based view. Journal of Management 36(3): 588–609.Google Scholar
Bozeman, B. and Kingsley, G. (1998). Risk culture in public and private organizations. Public Administration Review 58(2): 109–118.Google Scholar
Bridwell-Mitchell, E. N. (2016). Collaborative institutional agency: How peer learning in communities of practice enables and inhibits micro-institutional change. Organization Studies 37(2): 161–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruneau, T. J. (1973). Communicative silences: Forms and functions. Journal of Communication 23(1): 17–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cappelen, S. M. and Strandgaard Pedersen, J. (2021). Inventing culinary heritage through strategic historical ambiguity. Organization Studies 42(2): 223–243.Google Scholar
Cappellaro, G., Compagni, A. and Vaara, E. (2021). Maintaining strategic ambiguity for protection: Struggles over opacity, equivocality, and absurdity around the Sicilian Mafia. Academy of Management Journal 64(1): 1–37.Google Scholar
Carson, S. J., Madhok, A. and Wu, T. (2006). Uncertainty, opportunism, and governance: The effects of volatility and ambiguity on formal and relational contracting. Academy of Management Journal 49(5): 1058–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chliova, M., Mair, J. and Vernis, A. (2020). Persistent category ambiguity: The case of social entrepreneurship. Organization Studies 41(7): 1019–1042.Google Scholar
Chun, Y. H. and Rainey, H. G. (2005). Goal ambiguity and organizational performance in US federal agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 15(4): 529–557.Google Scholar
Coff, R. and Kryscynski, D. (2011). Invited editorial: Drilling for micro-foundations of human capital-based competitive advantages. Journal of Management 37(5): 1429–1443.Google Scholar
Coff, R. W. (1999). When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science 10(2): 119–133.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. D. and March, J. G. (1974). Leadership and ambiguity: The American college president. New York, McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly 17(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Contractor, N. S. and Ehrlich, M. C. (1993). Strategic ambiguity in the birth of a loosely coupled organization: The case of a $50-million experiment. Management Communication Quarterly 6(3): 251–281.Google Scholar
Coopey, J., Keegan, O. and Emler, N. (1998). Managers’ innovations and the structuration of organizations. Journal of Management Studies 35(3): 263–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cording, M., Christmann, P. and King, D. R. (2008). Reducing causal ambiguity in acquisition integration: Intermediate goals as mediators of integration decisions and acquisition performance. Academy of Management Journal 51(4): 744–767.Google Scholar
Cornelissen, J. P., Mantere, S. and Vaara, E. (2014). The contraction of meaning: The combined effect of communication, emotions, and materiality on sensemaking in the Stockwell shooting. Journal of Management Studies 51(5): 699–736.Google Scholar
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Daft, R. L. and Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design. Management Science 32(5): 554–571.Google Scholar
Daft, R. L. and Macintosh, N. B. (1981). A tentative exploration into the amount and equivocality of information processing in organizational work units. Administrative Science Quarterly: 26(2): 207–224.Google Scholar
Daft, R. L. and Weick, K. E. (1984). Toward a model of organizations as interpretation systems. Academy of Management Review 9(2): 284–295.Google Scholar
Dandridge, T. C., Mitroff, I. and Joyce, W. F. (1980). Organizational symbolism: A topic to expand organizational analysis. Academy of Management Review 5(1): 77–82.Google Scholar
Davenport, S. and Leitch, S. (2005). Circuits of power in practice: Strategic ambiguity as delegation of authority. Organization Studies 26(11): 1603–1623.Google Scholar
Davis, R. S. and Stazyk, E. C. (2015). Developing and testing a new goal taxonomy: Accounting for the complexity of ambiguity and political support. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(3): 751–775.Google Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Dompierre, G., Langley, A. and Rouleau, L. (2011). Escalating indecision: Between reification and strategic ambiguity. Organization Science 22(1): 225–244.Google Scholar
Denis, J.-L., Langley, A. and Cazale, L. (1996). Leadership and strategic change under ambiguity. Organization Studies 17(4): 673–699.Google Scholar
Donnelly, R. (2011). The ambiguities and tensions in creating and capturing value: Views from HRM consultants in a leading consultancy firm. Human Resource Management 50(3): 425–440.Google Scholar
Duhaime, I. M. and Schwenk, C. R. (1985). Conjectures on cognitive simplification in acquisition and divestment decision making. Academy of Management Review 10(2): 287–295.Google Scholar
Durand, R., and Boulongne, R. (2017). Advancing research on categories for institutional approaches of organizations. In Greenwood, R., Oliver, C., Lawrence, T. B., and Meyer, R. E. (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, 2nd ed. London, Sage.Google Scholar
Edelman, M. (1977). Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. New York, Academic Press.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, E. M. (1984). Ambiguity as strategy in organizational communication. Communication Monographs 51(3): 227–242.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, E. M. (2007). Strategic ambiguities: Essays on communication, organization, and identity. London, Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenberg, E. M., Goodall, H. L. Jr and Trethewey, A. (2013). Organizational communication: Balancing creativity and constraint. Macmillan Higher Education, London, UK.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, E. M. and Riley, P. (1988). Organizational symbols and sense-making. Handbook of Organizational Communication, 6th ed. (pp. 31–150) 131. Boston, Bedford/St. Martin‘s.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, E. M. and Witten, M. G. (1987). Reconsidering openness in organizational communication. Academy of Management Review 12(3): 418–426.Google Scholar
Eppler, M. J., Mengis, J. and Bresciani, S. (2008). Seven types of visual ambiguity: On the merits and risks of multiple interpretations of collaborative visualizations. 2008 12th International Conference Information Visualisation, IEEE.Google Scholar
Etter, M., Colleoni, E., Illia, L., Meggiorin, K. and D’Eugenio, A. (2018). Measuring organizational legitimacy in social media: Assessing citizens’ judgments with sentiment analysis. Business & Society 57(1): 60–97.Google Scholar
Faircloth, A. W. and Ricchiute, D. N. (1981). Ambiguity intolerance and financial reporting alternatives. Accounting, Organizations and Society 6(1): 53–67.Google Scholar
Fairhurst, G. T., Smith, W. K., Banghart et al., S. G. (2016). Diverging and converging: Integrative insights on a paradox meta-perspective. Academy of Management Annals 10(1): 173–182.Google Scholar
Farjoun, M. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes. In A. Langley and H. Tsoukas (Eds.), The Sage handbook of process organization studies (pp. 87–109). London, Sage.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. (1991). The meanings of ambiguity: Learning from stories and metaphors. In Frost, P., Moore, L., Louis, M. Reis, Lundberg, C. and Martin, J. (Eds.), Reframing organizational culture (pp. 145–156). Newbury Park, Sage.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. P., Ozcan, S. and Reichstein, T. (2019). Falling not far from the tree: Entrepreneurs and organizational heritage. Organization Science 30(2): 337–360.Google Scholar
Feldman, M. S. (1989). Order without design: Information production and policy making. Stanford, Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Feront, C. and Bertels, S. (2021). The impact of frame ambiguity on field-level change. Organization Studies 42(7): 1135–1165.Google Scholar
Fleischer, A. (2009). Ambiguity and the equity of rating systems: United States brokerage firms, 1995–2000. Administrative Science Quarterly 54(4): 555–574.Google Scholar
Forbes, D. P. (2007). Reconsidering the strategic implications of decision comprehensiveness. Academy of Management Review 32(2): 361–376.Google Scholar
Garud, R. and Van de Ven, A. H. (1992). An empirical evaluation of the internal corporate venturing process. Strategic Management Journal 13(S1): 93–109.Google Scholar
Gavetti, G. and Warglien, M. (2015). A model of collective interpretation. Organization Science 26(5): 1263–1283.Google Scholar
Gioia, D. A., Nag, R. and Corley, K. G. (2012). Visionary ambiguity and strategic change: The virtue of vagueness in launching major organizational change. Journal of Management Inquiry 21(4): 364–375.Google Scholar
Giroux, H. (2006). “It was such a handy term”: Management fashions and pragmatic ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies 43(6): 1227–1260.Google Scholar
Glazer, A. (1990). The strategy of candidate ambiguity. American Political Science Review 84(1): 237–241.Google Scholar
Glozer, S., Caruana, R. and Hibbert, S. A. (2019). The never-ending story: Discursive legitimation in social media dialogue. Organization Studies 40(5): 625–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gonzalez-Mulé, E., Courtright, S. H., DeGeest, D., Seong, J.-Y. and Hong, D.-S. (2016). Channeled autonomy: The joint effects of autonomy and feedback on team performance through organizational goal clarity. Journal of Management 42(7): 2018–2033.Google Scholar
Gottschalg, O. and Zollo, M. (2007). Interest alignment and competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 32(2): 418–437.Google Scholar
Granqvist, N., Grodal, S. and Woolley, J. L. (2013). Hedging your bets: Explaining executives’ market labeling strategies in nanotechnology. Organization Science 24(2): 395–413.Google Scholar
Granqvist, N. and Ritvala, T. (2016). Beyond prototypes: Drivers of market categorization in functional foods and nanotechnology. Journal of Management Studies 53(2): 210–237.Google Scholar
Guthey, E. and Morsing, M. (2014). CSR and the mediated emergence of strategic ambiguity. Journal of Business Ethics 120(4): 555–569.Google Scholar
Haas, M. R. (2006). Knowledge gathering, team capabilities, and project performance in challenging work environments. Management Science 52(8): 1170–1184.Google Scholar
Hahn, T., Preuss, L., Pinkse, J. and Figge, F. (2014). Cognitive frames in corporate sustainability: Managerial sensemaking with paradoxical and business case frames. Academy of Management Review 39(4): 463–487.Google Scholar
Hatch, M. J. and Erhlich, S. B. (1993). Spontaneous humour as an indicator of paradox and ambiguity in organizations. Organization Studies 14(4): 505–526.Google Scholar
Hazen, M. A. (1993). Towards polyphonic organization. Journal of Organizational Change Management 6(5): 15–26.Google Scholar
Heide, J. B. and Miner, A. S. (1992). The shadow of the future: Effects of anticipated interaction and frequency of contact on buyer-seller cooperation. Academy of Management Journal 35(2): 265–291.Google Scholar
Hennestad, B. W. (1990). The symbolic impact of double bind leadership: Double bind and the dynamics of organizational culture. Journal of Management Studies 27(3): 265–280.Google Scholar
Höllerer, M. A., Daudigeos, T. and Jancsary, D. (2017). Multimodality, meaning, and institutions. Bingley, Emerald.Google Scholar
Höllerer, M. A., Jancsary, D. and Grafström, M. (2018). “A picture is worth a thousand words”: Multimodal sensemaking of the global financial crisis. Organization Studies 39(5–6): 617–644.Google Scholar
Höllerer, M. A., van Leeuwen, T., Jancsary, D. et al. (2019). Visual and multimodal research in organization and management studies. Milton Park, Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsieh, C.-C., Ma, Z. and Novoselov, K. E. (2018). Accounting conservatism, business strategy, and ambiguity. Accounting, Organizations and Society 30: 1e15.Google Scholar
Hubbard, T. D., Pollock, T. G., Pfarrer, M. D. and Rindova, V. P. (2018). Safe bets or hot hands? How status and celebrity influence strategic alliance formations by newly public firms. Academy of Management Journal 61(5): 1976–1999.Google Scholar
Inkpen, A. C. (2008). Knowledge transfer and international joint ventures: The case of NUMMI and General Motors. Strategic Management Journal 29(4): 447–453.Google Scholar
Jacquart, P. and Antonakis, J. (2015). When does charisma matter for top-level leaders? Effect of attributional ambiguity. Academy of Management Journal 58(4): 1051–1074.Google Scholar
Jalonen, K., Schildt, H. and Vaara, E. (2018). Strategic concepts as micro-level tools in strategic sensemaking. Strategic Management Journal 39(5): 2794–2826.Google Scholar
Jancsary, D., Höllerer, M. A. and Meyer, R. E. (2016). Critical analysis of visual and multimodal texts. In Wodak, R. and Meyer, M. (Eds.), Methods of critical discourse studies, 3rd ed. (pp. 180–204). London, Sage.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P., Sillince, J. A. and Shaw, D. (2010). Strategic ambiguity as a rhetorical resource for enabling multiple interests. Human Relations 63(2): 219–248.Google Scholar
Jarzabkowski, P. A. and Lê, J. K. (2017). We have to do this and that? You must be joking: Constructing and responding to paradox through humor. Organization Studies 38(3–4): 433–462.Google Scholar
Jones, G. R. (1987). Organization-client transactions and organizational governance structures. Academy of Management Journal 30(2): 197–218.Google Scholar
Joseph, J. and Gaba, V. (2015). The fog of feedback: Ambiguity and firm responses to multiple aspiration levels. Strategic Management Journal 36(13): 1960–1978.Google Scholar
Jung, C. S. (2013). Navigating a rough terrain of public management: Examining the relationship between organizational size and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 23(3): 663–686.Google Scholar
Jung, C. S. (2014a). Extending the theory of goal ambiguity to programs: Examining the relationship between goal ambiguity and performance. Public Administration Review 74(2): 205–219.Google Scholar
Jung, C. S. (2014b). Organizational goal ambiguity and job satisfaction in the public sector. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(4): 955–981.Google Scholar
Jung, C. S. (2014c). Why are goals important in the public sector? Exploring the benefits of goal clarity for reducing turnover intention. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 24(1): 209–234.Google Scholar
Kelemen, M. (2000). Too much or too little ambiguity: The language of total quality management. Journal of Management Studies 37(4): 483–498.Google Scholar
King, A. W. (2007). Disentangling interfirm and intrafirm causal ambiguity: A conceptual model of causal ambiguity and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 32(1): 156–178.Google Scholar
King, A. W. and Ranft, A. L. (2001). Capturing knowledge and knowing through improvisation: What managers can learn from the thoracic surgery board certification process. Journal of Management 27(3): 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, A. W. and Zeithaml, C. P. (2001). Competencies and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management Journal 22(1): 75–99.3.0.CO;2-I>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, R. (1982). Performance, evaluation and the NHS: A case study in conceptual perplexity and organizational complexity. Public Administration 60(4): 385–407.Google Scholar
Knight, E. and Tsoukas, H. (2019). When fiction trumps truth: What “post-truth” and “alternative facts” mean for management studies. Organization Studies 40(2): 183–197.Google Scholar
Konlechner, S. and Ambrosini, V. (2019). Issues and trends in causal ambiguity research: A review and assessment. Journal of Management 45(6): 2352–2386.Google Scholar
Kress, G. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal discourse: The modes and media of contemporary communication. London, Arnold.Google Scholar
Kwon, W., Clarke, I., Vaara, E., Mackay, R. and Wodak, R. (2020a). Using verbal irony to move on with controversial issues. Organization Science 31(4): 865–886.Google Scholar
Kwon, W., Mackay, R., Clarke, I., Wodak, R. and Vaara, E. (2020b). Testing, stretching, and aligning: Using “ironic personae” to make sense of complicated issues. Journal of Pragmatics 166: 44–58.Google Scholar
Kydd, C. T. (1989). Understanding the information content in MIS management tools. Mis Quarterly 13(3): 277–290.Google Scholar
Lakshman, C. (2011). Postacquisition cultural integration in mergers & acquisitions: A knowledge‐based approach. Human Resource Management 50(5): 605–623.Google Scholar
Lee, J. W., Rainey, H. G. and Chun, Y. H. (2009). Of politics and purpose: Political salience and goal ambiguity of US federal agencies. Public Administration 87(3): 457–484.Google Scholar
Lee, W. E. and Hageman, A. M. (2018). Talk the talk or walk the walk? An examination of sustainability accounting implementation. Journal of Business Ethics 152(3): 725–739.Google Scholar
Lei, D., Hitt, M. A. and Bettis, R. (1996). Dynamic core competences through meta-learning and strategic context. Journal of Management 22(4): 549–569.Google Scholar
Leitch, S. and Davenport, S. (2002). Strategic ambiguity in communicating public sector change. Journal of Communication Management 7(2): 129–139.Google Scholar
Leitch, S. and Davenport, S. (2007). Strategic ambiguity as a discourse practice: The role of keywords in the discourse on “sustainable” biotechnology. Discourse Studies 9(1): 43–61.Google Scholar
Levinthal, D. and March, J. G. (1981). A model of adaptive organizational search. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2(4): 307–333.Google Scholar
Levinthal, D. A. and Rerup, C. (2021). The plural of goal: Learning in a world of ambiguity. Organization Science 32(3): 527–543.Google Scholar
Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review 25(4): 760–776.Google Scholar
Lingo, E. L. and O’Mahony, S. (2010). Nexus work: Brokerage on creative projects. Administrative Science Quarterly 55(1): 47–81.Google Scholar
Lippman, S. A. and Rumelt, R. P. (1982). Uncertain imitability: An analysis of interfirm differences in efficiency under competition. The Bell Journal of Economics 13(2): 418–438.Google Scholar
Litrico, J.-B. and David, R. J. (2017). The evolution of issue interpretation within organizational fields: Actor positions, framing trajectories, and field settlement. Academy of Management Journal 60(3): 986–1015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockett, A. and Thompson, S. (2001). The resource-based view and economics. Journal of Management 27(6): 723–754.Google Scholar
Luscher, L. S., Lewis, M. and Ingram, A. (2006). The social construction of organizational change paradoxes. Journal of Organizational Change Management 19(4): 491–502.Google Scholar
Maitlis, S. and Christianson, M. (2014). Sensemaking in organizations: Taking stock and moving forward. Academy of Management Annals 8(1): 57–125.Google Scholar
Maitlis, S. and Ozcelik, H. (2004). Toxic decision processes: A study of emotion and organizational decision making. Organization Science 15(4): 375–393.Google Scholar
March, J. G. (1958). A behavioral theory of decision making. Personnel Administration 21(3): 8–10.Google Scholar
March, J. G. (1962). The business firm as a political coalition. The Journal of Politics 24(4): 662–678.Google Scholar
March, J. G. (1978). Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice. The Bell Journal of Economics 9(2): 587–608.Google Scholar
March, J. G. (1994). Primer on decision making: How decisions happen. Manhattan, Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
March, J. G. and Olsen, J. P. (1976). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Ithaca, Bergen, Univeritetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Markham, A. (1996). Designing discourse: A critical analysis of strategic ambiguity and workplace control. Management Communication Quarterly 9(4): 389–421.Google Scholar
McEvily, S. K., Das, S. and McCabe, K. (2000). Avoiding competence substitution through knowledge sharing. Academy of Management Review 25(2): 294–311.Google Scholar
McMahan, P. and Evans, J. (2018). Ambiguity and engagement. American Journal of Sociology 124(3): 860–912.Google Scholar
Meszaros, J. R. (1999). Preventive choices: Organizations’ heuristics, decision processes and catastrophic risks. Journal of Management Studies 36(7): 977–998.Google Scholar
Meyer, R. E. and Höllerer, M. A. (2016). Laying a smoke screen: Ambiguity and neutralization as strategic responses to intra-institutional complexity. Strategic Organization 14(4): 373–406.Google Scholar
Meyer, R. E., Höllerer, M. A., Jancsary, D. and Van Leeuwen, T. (2013). The visual dimension in organizing, organization, and organization research: Core ideas, current developments, and promising avenues. Academy of Management Annals 7(1): 489–555.Google Scholar
Mosakowski, E. (1997). Strategy making under causal ambiguity: Conceptual issues and empirical evidence. Organization Science 8(4): 414–442.Google Scholar
Moussavi, F. and Evans, D. A. (1993). Emergence of organizational attributions: The role of a shared cognitive schema. Journal of Management 19(1): 79–95.Google Scholar
Moynihan, D. P. (2006). What do we talk about when we talk about performance? Dialogue theory and performance budgeting. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 16(2): 151–168.Google Scholar
Munro, R. (1995). Managing by ambiguity: An archaeology of the social in the absence of management accounting. Critical Perspectives on Accounting 6(5): 433–482.Google Scholar
Navis, C. and Glynn, M. A. (2011). Legitimate distinctiveness and the entrepreneurial identity: Influence on investor judgments of new venture plausibility. Academy of Management Review 36(3): 479–499.Google Scholar
Nicolai, A. T. and Dautwiz, J. M. (2010). Fuzziness in action: What consequences has the linguistic ambiguity of the core competence concept for organizational usage? British Journal of Management 21(4): 874–888.Google Scholar
Noval, L. J. and Hernandez, M. (2019). The unwitting accomplice: How organizations enable motivated reasoning and self-serving behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 157(3): 699–713.Google Scholar
Ouchi, W. G. (1980). Markets, bureaucracies, and clans. Administrative Science Quarterly 25(1): 129–141.Google Scholar
Ozcan, P. and Gurses, K. (2018). Playing cat and mouse: Contests over regulatory categorization of dietary supplements in the United States. Academy of Management Journal 61(5): 1789–1820.Google Scholar
Packard, M. D., Clark, B. B. and Klein, P. G. (2017). Uncertainty types and transitions in the entrepreneurial process. Organization Science 28(5): 840–856.Google Scholar
Padgett, J. F. and Ansell, C. K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology 98(6): 1259–1319.Google Scholar
Page, B. I. (1976). The theory of political ambiguity. American Political Science Review 70(3): 742–752.Google Scholar
Parker, S. and Racz, M. (2020). Affective and effective truths: Rhetoric, normativity and critical management studies. Organization 27(3): 454–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, J. and Strbiak, C. A. (1997). The ethics of strategic ambiguity. The Journal of Business Communication 34(2): 149–159.Google Scholar
Pescosolido, A. T. (2002). Emergent leaders as managers of group emotion. The Leadership Quarterly 13(5): 583–599.Google Scholar
Petkova, A. P., Wadhwa, A., Yao, X. and Jain, S. (2014). Reputation and decision making under ambiguity: A study of US venture capital firms’ investments in the emerging clean energy sector. Academy of Management Journal 57(2): 422–448.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action: The creation and maintenance of organizational paradigm. Research in Organizational Behavior 3: 1–52.Google Scholar
Phillips, N. and Oswick, C. (2012). Organizational discourse: Domains, debates, and directions. Academy of Management Annals 6(1): 435–481.Google Scholar
Pich, M. T., Loch, C. H. and Meyer, A. D. (2002). On uncertainty, ambiguity, and complexity in project management. Management Science 48(8): 1008–1023.Google Scholar
Pinder, C. C. and Harlos, K. P. (2001). Employee silence: Quiescence and acquiescence as responses to perceived injustice. In Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 331–369). Bingley, Emerald Group.Google Scholar
Pontikes, E. G. (2012). Two sides of the same coin: How ambiguous classification affects multiple audiences’ evaluations. Administrative Science Quarterly 57(1): 81–118.Google Scholar
Powell, T. C., Lovallo, D. and Caringal, C. (2006). Causal ambiguity, management perception, and firm performance. Academy of Management Review 31(1): 175–196.Google Scholar
Purcell, J. and Gray, A. (1986). Corporate personnel departments and the management of industrial relations: Two case studies in ambiguity. Journal of Management Studies 23(2): 205–223.Google Scholar
Putnam, L. and Pacanowsky, M. E. (1983). Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach. London, Sage.Google Scholar
Putnam, L. L. (1986). Contradictions and paradoxes in organizations. In Thayer, L. (Ed.), Organization-communication: Emerging perspectives (pp. 151–167). Norwood, Ablex.Google Scholar
Putnam, L. L., Fairhurst, G. T. and Banghart, S. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals 10(1): 65–171.Google Scholar
Quattrone, P. (2017). Embracing ambiguity in management controls and decision-making processes: On how to design data visualisations to prompt wise judgement. Accounting and Business Research 47(5): 588–612.Google Scholar
Quattrone, P., Ronzani, M., Jancsary, D. and Höllerer, M. A. (2021). Beyond the visible, the material and the performative: Shifting perspectives on the visual in organization studies. Organization Studies 42(8): 1197–1218.Google Scholar
Rainey, H. G. and Bozeman, B. (2000). Comparing public and private organizations: Empirical research and the power of the a priori. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 10(2): 447–470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainey, H. G. and Jung, C. S. (2015). A conceptual framework for analysis of goal ambiguity in public organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 25(1): 71–99.Google Scholar
Rajagopalan, N. and Finkelstein, S. (1992). Effects of strategic orientation and environmental change on senior management reward systems. Strategic Management Journal 13(S1): 127–141.Google Scholar
Ramsay, J. (2004). Trope control: The costs and benefits of metaphor unreliability in the description of empirical phenomena. British Journal of Management 15(2): 143–155.Google Scholar
Reed, R. and DeFillippi, R. J. (1990). Causal ambiguity, barriers to imitation, and sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 15(1): 88–102.Google Scholar
Rindova, V., Ferrier, W. J. and Wiltbank, R. (2010). Value from gestalt: How sequences of competitive actions create advantage for firms in nascent markets. Strategic Management Journal 31(13): 1474–1497.Google Scholar
Ring, P. S. and Perry, J. L. (1985). Strategic management in public and private organizations: Implications of distinctive contexts and constraints. Academy of Management Review 10(2): 276–286.Google Scholar
Robertson, M. and Swan, J. (2003). “Control – What control?” Culture and ambiguity within a knowledge intensive firm. Journal of Management Studies 40(4): 831–858.Google Scholar
Ruefli, T. and Sarrazin, J. (1981). Strategic control of corporate development under ambiguous circumstances. Management Science 27(10): 1158–1170.Google Scholar
Ryall, M. D. (2009). Causal ambiguity, complexity, and capability-based advantage. Management Science 55(3): 389–403.Google Scholar
Sarasvathy, S. D., Dew, N., Read, S. and Wiltbank, R. (2008). Designing organizations that design environments: Lessons from entrepreneurial expertise. Organization Studies 29(3): 331–350.Google Scholar
Scandelius, C. and Cohen, G. (2016). Achieving collaboration with diverse stakeholders – The role of strategic ambiguity in CSR communication. Journal of Business Research 69(9): 3487–3499.Google Scholar
Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S. and Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals 10(1): 5–64.Google Scholar
Schramm, C. J. (1975). Thompson’s assessment of organizations: Universities and the AAUP salary grades. Administrative Science Quarterly 20(1): 87–96.Google Scholar
Schwenk, C. R. (1988). Effects of devil’s advocacy on escalating commitment. Human Relations 41(10): 769–782.Google Scholar
Sellnow, T. L. and Ulmer, R. R. (1995). Ambiguous argument as advocacy in organizational crisis communication. Argumentation and Advocacy 31(3): 138–150.Google Scholar
Sewell, G. and Barker, J. R. (2006). Coercion versus care: Using irony to make sense of organizational surveillance. Academy of Management Review 31(4): 934–961.Google Scholar
Sgourev, S. V. (2013). How Paris gave rise to Cubism (and Picasso): Ambiguity and fragmentation in radical innovation. Organization Science 24(6): 1601–1617.Google Scholar
Shepsle, K. A. (1972). The strategy of ambiguity: Uncertainty and electoral competition. American Political Science Review 66(2): 555–568.Google Scholar
Shon, J., Porumbescu, G. A. and Christensen, R. K. (2020). Can budget ambiguity crowd out intrinsic motivation? Longitudinal evidence from federal executive departments. Public Administration 98(1): 194–209.Google Scholar
Sillince, J., Jarzabkowski, P. and Shaw, D. (2012). Shaping strategic action through the rhetorical construction and exploitation of ambiguity. Organization Science 23(3): 630–650.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1947). Administrative behavior: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York, Macmillan.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1959). Theories of decision making in economics and behavioral science. American Economic Review 49: 253–283.Google Scholar
Smith, W. K. and Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review 36(2): 381–403.Google Scholar
Sonenshein, S. (2010). We’re changing – Or are we? Untangling the role of progressive, regressive, and stability narratives during strategic change implementation. Academy of Management Journal 53(3): 477–512.Google Scholar
Sorensen, R. (2003). A brief history of the paradox: Philosophy and the labyrinths of the mind. Oxford, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sorsa, V. and Vaara, E. (2020). How can pluralistic organizations proceed with strategic change? A processual account of rhetorical contestation, convergence, and partial agreement in a Nordic city organization. Organization Science 31(4): 839–864.Google Scholar
Spee, P. and Jarzabkowski, P. (2017). Agreeing on what? Creating joint accounts of strategic change. Organization Science 28(1): 152–176.Google Scholar
Spicer, A. (2020). Playing the bullshit game: How empty and misleading communication takes over organizations. Organization Theory 1(2): 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787720929704.Google Scholar
Srivastava, S. B. (2015). Intraorganizational network dynamics in times of ambiguity. Organization Science 26(5): 1365–1380.Google Scholar
Stazyk, E. C. and Goerdel, H. T. (2011). The benefits of bureaucracy: Public managers’ perceptions of political support, goal ambiguity, and organizational effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 21(4): 645–672.Google Scholar
Stone, M. M. and Brush, C. G. (1996). Planning in ambiguous contexts: The dilemma of meeting needs for commitment and demands for legitimacy. Strategic Management Journal 17(8): 633–652.Google Scholar
Sullivan, P. and McCarthy, J. (2008). Managing the polyphonic sounds of organizational truths. Organization Studies 29(4): 525–541.Google Scholar
Szulanski, G. (1996). Exploring internal stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm. Strategic Management Journal 17(S2): 27–43.Google Scholar
Szulanski, G., Cappetta, R. and Jensen, R. J. (2004). When and how trustworthiness matters: Knowledge transfer and the moderating effect of causal ambiguity. Organization Science 15(5): 600–613.Google Scholar
Szulanski, G., Ringov, D. and Jensen, R. J. (2016). Overcoming stickiness: How the timing of knowledge transfer methods affects transfer difficulty. Organization Science 27(2): 304–322.Google Scholar
Townsend, D. M., Hunt, R. A., McMullen, J. S. and Sarasvathy, S. D. (2018). Uncertainty, knowledge problems, and entrepreneurial action. Academy of Management Annals 12(2): 659–687.Google Scholar
Turcotte, W. E. (1974). Control systems, performance, and satisfaction in two state agencies. Administrative Science Quarterly 19: 60–73.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L. and Nadler, D. A. (1978). Information processing as an integrating concept in organizational design. Academy of Management Review 3(3): 613–624.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L. and O’Reilly, C. A. III (1996). Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Management Review 38(4): 8–29.Google Scholar
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157): 1124–1131.Google Scholar
Ulmer, R. R. and Sellnow, T. L. (1997). Strategic ambiguity and the ethic of significant choice in the tobacco industry’s crisis communication. Communication Studies 48(3): 215–233.Google Scholar
Ulmer, R. R. and Sellnow, T. L. (2000). Consistent questions of ambiguity in organizational crisis communication: Jack in the Box as a case study. Journal of Business Ethics 25(2): 143–155.Google Scholar
Vakkuri, J. (2010). Struggling with ambiguity: Public managers as users of NPM‐oriented management instruments. Public Administration 88(4): 999–1024.Google Scholar
Van Dyne, L., Ang, S. and Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies 40(6): 1359–1392.Google Scholar
Vermeulen, F. (2018). A basic theory of inheritance: How bad practice prevails. Strategic Management Journal 39(6): 1603–1629.Google Scholar
Walder, A. G. (2006). Ambiguity and choice in political movements: The origins of Beijing Red Guard factionalism. American Journal of Sociology 112(3): 710–750.Google Scholar
Wang, P. and Jensen, M. (2019). A bridge too far: Divestiture as a strategic reaction to status inconsistency. Management Science 65(2): 859–878.Google Scholar
Ware, B. L. and Linkugel, W. A. (1973). They spoke in defense of themselves: On the generic criticism of apologia. Quarterly Journal of Speech 59(3): 273–283.Google Scholar
Weick, K. (1983). Organizational communication: Toward a research agenda. In L. Putnam, L. and Pacanowsky, M. E. (Eds.), Communication and organizations: An interpretive approach (pp. 13–29). Newbury Park, Sage.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1984). Small wins: Redefining the scale of social problems. American psychologist 39(1): 40.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. (1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly 38(4): 628–652.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E. and Sutcliffe, K. M. (2001). Managing the unexpected. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E., Sutcliffe, K. M. and Obstfeld, D. (2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science 16(4): 409–421.Google Scholar
Wexler, M. N. (2009). Strategic ambiguity in emergent coalitions: The triple bottom line. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 14( 1): 62.Google Scholar
Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. The Journal of Law and Economics 22(2): 233–261.Google Scholar
Wolbers, J., Boersma, K. and Groenewegen, P. (2018). Introducing a fragmentation perspective on coordination in crisis management. Organization Studies 39(11): 1521–1546.Google Scholar
Wu, X. and Zhang, F. (2014). Home or overseas? An analysis of sourcing strategies under competition. Management Science 60(5): 1223–1240.Google Scholar
Zack, M. H. (2000). Managing organizational ignorance. In J. Woods and J. Cortada (Eds.), The knowledge management yearbook 2000–2001 (pp. 353–373). Boston, Routledge.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology 104(5): 1398–1438.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, E. W. (2000). Focusing the corporate product: Securities analysts and de-diversification. Administrative Science Quarterly 45(3): 591–619.Google Scholar
Zuzul, T. W. (2019). “Matter Battles”: Cognitive representations, boundary objects, and the failure of collaboration in two smart cities. Academy of Management Journal 62(3): 739–764.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
Video Abstract:EORT: Ambiguity in Organization Theory: Giulia Cappellaro, Amelia Compagni, Eero Vaara
This Element is free online from 16th January 2023 - 30th January 2023
This Element is free online from 16th January 2023 - 30th January 2023
- 11
- Cited by