Element contents
Divine Ideas
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 August 2020
Summary
This Element defends a version of the classical theory of divine ideas, the containment exemplarist theory of divine ideas. The classical theory holds that God has ideas of all possible creatures, that these ideas partially explain why God's creation of the world is a rational and free personal action, and that God does not depend on anything external to himself for having the ideas he has. The containment exemplarist version of the classical theory holds that God's own nature is the exemplar of all possible creatures, and therefore that God's ideas of possible creatures are in some sense ideas of himself. Containment exemplarism offers a monotheism fit for metaphysics, insofar as it is coherent, simple, and explanatorily powerful; and offers a metaphysics fit for monotheism, insofar as it leaves God truly worthy of the unconditional worship which Christians, along with Jews and Muslims, aspire to offer to God.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108876445Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 03 September 2020
References
Aertsen, Jan A. Medieval Philosophy as Transcendental Thought: From Philip the Chancellor (ca. 1225) to Francisco Suárez. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar
Al-Ghazali, , Incoherence of the Philosophers, trans. Sabih Ahmad Kamali. Lahore: Pakistan Philosophical Congress, 1963.Google Scholar
Allen, James P. Genesis in Egypt: the Philosophy of Egyptian Creation Accounts. New Haven, CT: Yale Egyptological Studies 2, 1988.Google Scholar
Anderson, James A. and Welty, Greg. “The Lord of Non-Contradiction: An Argument for God from Logic,” Philosophia Christi 13:2 (2011), pp. 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anselm, . Basic Writings, ed. and trans. Thomas Williams. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2007.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Basic Works, ed. Hause, Jeffrey and Pasnau, Robert. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2014.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Scriptum super Sententiis. Textum Parmae, 1856. www.corpusthomisticum.org.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas. Summa theologiae, 3 vols., trans. The Fathers of the English Dominican Province. New York: Benziger Brothers, 1947.Google Scholar
Arnold, Bill T. and Beyer, Bryan E. Readings from the Ancient Near East: Primary Sources for Old Testament Study. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker, 2002.Google Scholar
Assmann, Jan. Of God and Gods: Egypt, Israel, and the Rise of Monotheism. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Assmann, Jan. The Search for God in Ancient Egypt, trans. David Lorton. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1984.Google Scholar
Augustine, . The City of God Against the Pagans, trans. R. W. Dyson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Confessions, trans. Henry Chadwick. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.Google Scholar
Augustine, . Eighty-Three Different Questions, trans. David L. Mosher. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Augustine, . On Free Choice of the Will, trans. Thomas Williams. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1993.Google Scholar
Avicenna, . The Metaphysics of The Healing, trans. Michael E. Marmura. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Michael and Brower, Jeffrey E. “A Theistic Argument Against Platonism (and in Support of Truthmakers and Divine Simplicity),” Oxford Studies in Metaphysics 2 (2006), pp. 357–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blander, Josh. “Same as it never was: John Duns Scotus’ Paris Reportatio account of identity and distinction,” British Journal of the History of Philosophy (2019), pp. 1–20. doi:10.1080/09608788.2019.1624946.Google Scholar
Bonaventure, . Commentary on the Sentences: Philosophy of God, trans. R. E. Houser and Timothy B. Noone. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2013.Google Scholar
Bonaventure, . Disputed Questions on the Knowledge of Christ, trans. Zachary Hayes, OFM. St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2005.Google Scholar
Burkert, Walter. Babylon, Memphis, Persepolis: Eastern Contexts of Greek Culture. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Clouser, Roy A. The Myth of Religious Neutrality: An Essay on the Hidden Role of Religious Belief in Theories. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press, 2005.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. Biographia Literaria, ed. Engell, James and Jackson Bate, W.. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor. The Complete Poems, ed. Keach, William. London: Penguin, 1997.Google Scholar
Copenhaver, Brian P. Hermetica: The Greek Corpus Hermeticum and the Latin Asclepius in a new English translation, with Notes and Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Coyle, Justin Shaun, “Creation Anticipated: Maximian Reverberations in Bonaventure’s Exemplarism,” in Maximus the Confessor as a European Philosopher, ed. Mitralexis, Sotiris, Steiris, Georgios, Podbielski, Marcin, and Lalla, Sebastian. Eugene, OR: Cascade Books, 2017, pp. 284–303.Google Scholar
Craig, William Lane. God Over All: Divine Aseity and the Challenge of Platonism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, Richard. “Gregory of Nyssa on Universals,” Vigiliae Christianiae 56:4 (2002), pp. 372–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Descartes, . Meditations, Objections, and Replies, ed. and trans. Ariew, Roger and Cress, Donald. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 2006.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. The Middle Platonists: 80 B.C. To A.D. 220, rev. ed. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1996.Google Scholar
Dillon, John. The Roots of Platonism: The Origins and Chief Features of a Philosophical Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dionysius, [Pseudo.]. The Divine Names and The Mystical Theology, trans. John D. Jones. Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Duns, Scotus, John. The Examined Report of the Paris Lecture: Reportatio I-A, 2 vols., ed. and trans. Wolter, Allan B. and Bychkov, Oleg V.. St. Bonaventure, NY: St. Bonaventure University Press, 2008.Google Scholar
Duns Scotus, John. Ordinatio, in Opera Omnia, vols.I–XIV, ed. The Scotistic Commission. Vatican City: Typis Vaticanis, 1950–2013.Google Scholar
Duns, Scotus, John. Philosophical Writings, trans. Allan Wolter. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1987.Google Scholar
Duns, Scotus, John. A Treatise on God as First Principle, trans. and ed. Wolter, Allan B.. Chicago: Franciscan Herald Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Farrer, Austin. Faith and Speculation: An Essay in Philosophical Theology. London: Adam and Charles Black, 1967.Google Scholar
Faulkner, R. O. The Ancient Egyptian Pyramid Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar
Foster, John L. Hymns, Prayers, and Songs: An Anthology of Ancient Egyptian Lyric Poetry, ed. Hollis, Susan Tower. SBL Writings from the Ancient World 8. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Frost, Gloria. “Thomas Aquinas on the Perpetual Truth of Essential Propositions,” History of Philosophy Quarterly 27:3 (2010), pp. 197–213.Google Scholar
Gersh, Stephen. From Iamblichus to Eriugena: An Investigation of the Prehistory and Evolution of the Pseudo-Dionysian Tradition. Leiden: Brill, 1978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, Paul. Beyond the Control of God? Six Views on the Problem of God and Abstract Objects. New York: Bloomsbury, 2014.Google Scholar
Guite, Malcom. Mariner: A Voyage with Samuel Taylor Coleridge. London: Hodder & Stoughton, 2017.Google Scholar
Heidel, Alexander. The Babylonian Genesis: the Story of Creation, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1951.Google Scholar
Henry of Ghent. Summae Quaestionum Ordinariarum, 2 vols. Paris, 1520. Rpt. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute, 1953.Google Scholar
Hoffmeier, James K. Akhenaten and the Origins of Monotheism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Gerard Manley. Poems, 3rd ed., ed. Gardner, W. H.. London: Oxford University Press, 1948.Google Scholar
Hornung, Erik. Conceptions of God in Ancient Egypt: The One and the Many, trans. John Baines. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Klima, Gyula. “The Medieval Problem of Universals”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017), ed. Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/universals-medieval/.Google Scholar
Klocker, Harry R. “Ockham and the Divine Ideas,” The Modern Schoolman 57:4 (1980), pp. 348–360.Google Scholar
Kretzmann, Norman. The Metaphysics of Creation: Aquinas’s Natural Theology in Summa Contra Gentiles II. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul. “A Completeness Theorem in Modal Logic,” The Journal of Symbolic Logic 24:1 (1959), pp. 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaZella, Andrew. The Singular Voice of Being: John Duns Scotus and Ultimate Difference. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried Wilhelm. Discourse on Metaphysics, trans. Roger Ariew and Daniel Garber, in Leibniz, , Philosophical Essays. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1989, pp. 35–68.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. The Voyage of the Dawn Treader, in The Chronicles of Narnia. New York: Harper Collins, 2004, pp. 419–542.Google Scholar
Lichtheim, Miriam. Ancient Egyptian Literature Volume I: The Old and Middle Kingdoms. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Lovejoy, A. O. The Great Chain of Being: A Study of the History of an Idea. New York: Harper & Brothers, 1960.Google Scholar
MacDonald, George. “The Fantastic Imagination,” in A Dish of Orts: Chiefly Papers on the Imagination, and on Shakespere [sic], enlarged ed. London: Sampson Low Marston & Company, 1895, pp. 313–322.Google Scholar
Majercik, Ruth. The Chaldean Oracles, 2nd ed. Bream, England: The Prometheus Trust, 2013.Google Scholar
Marrone, Steven P. “Revisiting Duns Scotus and Henry of Ghent on Modality,” in John Duns Scotus: Metaphysics and Ethics, ed. Honnefelder, Ludger, Wood, Rega, and Dreyer, Mechthild. Leiden: Brill, 1996, pp. 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marrone, Steven P. Truth and Scientific Knowledge in the Thought of Henry of Ghent. Cambridge, MA: Medieval Academy of America, 1985.Google Scholar
Maximus the Confessor. On Difficulties in the Church Fathers: The Ambigua, 2 vols., ed. and trans. Constas, Nicholas. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2014.Google Scholar
May, Herbert G. and Metzger, Bruce M. The New Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha, expanded edition. Revised Standard Version. New York: Oxford University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
McCann, Hugh J. Creation and the Sovereignty of God. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Jonathan. The Flame Imperishable: Tolkien, St. Thomas, and the Metaphysics of Faërie. Kettering, OH: Angelico Press, 2017.Google Scholar
McIntosh, Mark, “The Maker’s Meaning: Divine Ideas and Salvation,” Modern Theology 28:3 (2012), pp. 365–384.Google Scholar
McNamara, Martin. Targum and Testament Revisited: Aramaic Paraphrases of the Hebrew Bible, 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2010.Google Scholar
Morris, Thomas V. and Menzel, Christopher. “Absolute Creation,” American Philosophical Quarterly 23:4 (1986), pp. 353–362.Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. God and Moral Law: On the Theistic Explanation of Morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011Google Scholar
Murphy, Mark C. God’s Own Ethics: Norms of Divine Agency and the Argument from Evil. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017.Google Scholar
Ockham, , William of. Scriptum in Librum Primum Sententiarum, Ordinatio: Distinctiones XIX-XLVIII, ed. Etzkorn, Girardus I. and Kelley, Franciscus E.. St. Bonaventure, NY: St. Bonaventure University, 2000.Google Scholar
Origen. On First Principles, trans. G. W. Butterworth. Notre Dame, IN: Ave Maria Press, 2013Google Scholar
Panchuk, Michelle. “Created and Uncreated Things: A Neo-Augustinian Solution to the Bootstrapping Problem,” International Philosophical Quarterly 56:1 (2016), pp. 99–112.Google Scholar
Parke-Taylor, G. H. Yahweh: The Divine Name in the Bible. Waterloo, Ontario: Wilfrid Laurer University Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Pelletier, Jenny. “William Ockham on Divine Ideas, Universals, and God’s Power,” in Universals in the Fourteenth Century, ed. Amerini, F. and Cesalli, L.. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale, 2017, pp. 187–224.Google Scholar
Philo of Alexandria, “On the Account of the World’s Creation Given by Moses,” in Philo, I, trans. F. H. Colson and G. H. Whitaker. Loeb Classical Library. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1929.Google Scholar
Pickstock, Catherine. “Duns Scotus: His Historical and Contemporary Significance,” Modern Theology 21:4 (2005), pp. 543–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. “Actualism and Possible Worlds,” in Plantinga, , Essays in the Metaphysics of Modality, ed. Davidson, Matthew. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, pp. 103–121.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. Does God Have a Nature? Milwaukee, WI: Marquette University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. “How to be an Anti-Realist,” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 56:1 (1982), pp. 47–70.Google Scholar
Plantinga, Alvin. Where the Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Naturalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.Google Scholar
Plotinus, , The Enneads, ed. Gerson, Lloyd P., trans. George Boys-Stones, John M. Dillon, Lloyd P. Gerson, R. A. H. King, Andrew Smith, and James Wilberding. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2018.Google Scholar
Proclus, , The Elements of Theology, 2nd ed. Ed. and trans. Dodds, E. R.. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, Jacob. The Faces of God: Canaanite Mythology as Hebrew Theology. Woodstock, CT: Spring Publications, 1998.Google Scholar
Ronning, John. The Jewish Targums and John’s Logos Theology. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2010.Google Scholar
Rosen, Gideon. “Abstract Objects,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2018), ed. Zalta, Edward N.. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2018/entries/abstract-objects/.Google Scholar
Ross, James. “Aquinas’s Exemplarism; Aquinas’s Voluntarism,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 64:2 (1990), pp. 171–198.Google Scholar
Seneca, . Ad Lucilium Epistulae Morales, vol. 1, trans. Richard M. Gummere. London: William Heinemann, 1917.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark. The Early History of God: Yahweh and the Other Deities in Ancient Israel, 2nd ed. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 2002.Google Scholar
Smith, Mark. The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel’s Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar
Spade, Paul Vincent (ed.). Five Texts on the Mediaeval Problem of Universals: Porphyry, Boethius, Abelard, Duns Scotus, Ockham, trans. Paul Vincent Space. Indianapolis: Hackett, 1994.Google Scholar
van Inwagen, Peter. “God and Other Uncreated Things,” in Metaphysics and the Good: Essays in Honor of Eleonore Stump, ed. Timpe, Kevin. New York: Routledge, 2009, pp. 3–20.Google Scholar
von Balthasar, Hans Urs. Cosmic Liturgy: The Universe According to Maximus the Confessor, trans. Brian E. Daly, S.J. San Francisco: Ignatius Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Ward, Thomas M. “Scotism about Possible Natures,” The Philosophical Quarterly 69:275 (2019), pp. 393–408.Google Scholar
Williams, Thomas and Steele, Jeff. “Complexity without Composition: Duns Scotus on Divine Simplicity,” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 93:4, (2019), pp. 611–631. doi:10.5840/acpq2019920185.Google Scholar
Wippel, John F. “Thomas Aquinas on the Distinction and Derivation of the Many from the One,” Review of Metaphysics 38:3 (1985), pp. 563–590.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, Ludwig. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. C. K. Ogden. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd., 1922.Google Scholar
Wolfson, Harry. Philo: Foundations of Religious Philosophy in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, 2 vols., Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1962.Google Scholar
Wolter, Allan B. “The Formal Distinction,” in Wolter, , The Philosophical Theology of John Duns Scotus, ed. McCord, Marilyn Adams, . St. Bonaventure, NY: Franciscan Institute Publications, 2015, pp. 31–48.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
This Element was updated in March 2021
- 22
- Cited by