Element contents
Global Spacetime Structure
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 November 2020
Summary
This exploration of the global structure of spacetime within the context of general relativity examines the causal and singular structures of spacetime, revealing some of the curious possibilities that are compatible with the theory, such as 'time travel' and 'holes' of various types. Investigations into the epistemic and modal structures of spacetime highlight the difficulties in ruling out such possibilities, unlikely as they may seem at first. The upshot seems to be that what counts as a 'physically reasonable' spacetime structure in modern physics is far from clear.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108876070Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 03 December 2020
References
Beem, J. (1980). Minkowski space-time is locally extendible. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 72(3), 273-275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beem, J., Ehrlich, P., & Easley, K. (1996). Global Lorentzian Geometry. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar
Bernal, A. & Sanchez, M. (2007). Globally hyperbolic spacetimes can be defined as “causal” instead of “strongly causal.” Classical and Quantum Gravity, 24(3), 745-749.Google Scholar
Butterfield, J. (2014). On under-determination in cosmology. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 46(1), 57-69.Google Scholar
Carter, B. (1971). Causal structure in spacetime. General Relativity and Gravitation, 1(4), 349-391.Google Scholar
Choquet-Bruhat, Y. & Geroch, R. (1969). Global aspects of the Cauchy problem in general relativity. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 14(4), 329-335.Google Scholar
Chrusciel, P. & Isenberg, J. (1993). Nonisometric vacuum extensions of vacuum maximal globally hyperbolic spacetimes. Physical Review D, 48(4), 1616-1628.Google Scholar
Clarke, C. (1976). Spacetime singularities. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 49(1), 17-23.Google Scholar
Clarke, C. (1993). The Analysis of Space-Time Singularities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, C. & Joshi, P. (1988). On reflecting spacetimes. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 5(1), 19-25.Google Scholar
Curiel, E. (1999). The analysis of singular spacetimes. Philosophy of Science, 66(Proceedings), S119-S145.Google Scholar
Curiel, E. (2017). A primer on energy conditions. In Lehmkuhl, D, Schie-mann, G., & Scholz, E., eds., Towards a Theory of Spacetime Theories. Boston: Birkhauser, 43-104.Google Scholar
Doboszewski, J. (2019). Epistemic holes and determinism in classical general relativity. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axz011Google Scholar
Doboszewski, J. (2020). Some other “no hole” spacetimes properties are unstable too. Foundations of Physics, 50(5), 379-384.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (1989). World Enough and Spacetime: Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (1995). Bangs, Crunches, Whimpers, and Shrieks: Singularities and Acausalities in Relativistic Spacetimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (2001). Lambda: The constant that refuses to die. Archives for History of Exact Sciences, 55(3), 189-220.Google Scholar
Earman, J. (2008). Pruning some branches from “branching spacetimes.” In Dieks, D., ed., The Ontology of Spacetime II. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 187-205.Google Scholar
Earman, J. & Norton, J. (1993). Forever is a day: Supertasks in Pitowsky and Malament-Hogarth spacetimes. Philosophy of Science, 60(1), 22-42.Google Scholar
Earman, J., Smeenk, C., & Wuthrich, C. (2009). Do the laws of physics forbid the operation of time machines? Synthese, 169(1), 91-124.Google Scholar
Earman, J., Wuthrich, C., & Manchak, J. (2016). Time machines. In Zalta, E., ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/time-machine/Google Scholar
Ellis, G. (1975). Cosmology and verifiability. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 16(1), 245-264.Google Scholar
Ellis, G. & Schmidt, B. (1977). Singular space-times. General Relativity and Gravitation, 8(11), 915-953.Google Scholar
Fletcher, S. (2016). Similarity, topology, and physical significance in relativity theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 67(2), 365-389.Google Scholar
Fletcher, S., Manchak, J., Schneider, M., & Weatherall, J. (2018). Would two dimensions be world enough for spacetime? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 63(1), 100-113.Google Scholar
Galloway, G. & Ling, E. (2017). Some remarks on the C°-(in)extendibility of spacetimes. Annales Henri Poincare, 18(1), 3427-3447.Google Scholar
Geroch, R. (1967). Topology in general relativity. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 8(4), 782-786.Google Scholar
Geroch, R. (1968a). What is a singularity in general relativity? Annals of Physics, 48(3), 526-540.Google Scholar
Geroch, R. (1968b). Structure of singularities. In DeWitt, C. & Wheeler, J., eds., Battelle Rencontres; 1967 Lectures in Mathematics and Physics. New York: Benjamin Inc., 236-241.Google Scholar
Geroch, R. (1968c). Local characterization of singularities in general relativity. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 9(3), 450-465.Google Scholar
Geroch, R. (1969). Limits of spacetimes. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 13(3), 180-193.Google Scholar
Geroch, R. (1970a). Singularities. In Carmeli, M, Fickler, S., & Witten, L., eds., Relativity. New York: Plenum Press, 259-291.Google Scholar
Geroch, R. (1970b). Domain of dependence. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 11(2), 437-449.Google Scholar
Geroch, R. (1971a). Spacetime structure from a global viewpoint. In Sachs, B., ed., General Relativity and Cosmology. New York: Academic Press, 71-103.Google Scholar
Geroch, R. (1971b). General relativity in the large. General Relativity and Gravitation, 2(1), 61-74.Google Scholar
Geroch, R. (1977). Prediction in general relativity. In Earman, J., Glymour, C., & Stachel, J., eds., Foundations of Space-Time Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 8. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 81-93.Google Scholar
Geroch, R. & Horowitz, G. (1979). Global structure of spacetimes. In Hawking, S. & Israel, W., eds., General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 212-293.Google Scholar
Glymour, C. (1977). Indistinguishable space-times and the fundamental group. In Earman, J., Glymour, C., & Stachel, J., eds., Foundations of SpaceTime Theories, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 8. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 50-60.Google Scholar
Godel, K. (1949). An example of a new type of cosmological solutions of Einstein’s field equations of gravitation. Reviews of Modern Physics, 21(3), 447-450.Google Scholar
Hajteek, P. (1971a). Bifurcate space-times. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 12(1), 157-160.Google Scholar
Hajteek, P. (1971b). Causality in non-Hausdorff space-times. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 21(1), 75-84.Google Scholar
Hawking, S. (1969). The existence of cosmic time functions. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 308(1494), 433-435.Google Scholar
Hawking, S. (1992). The chronology protection conjecture. Physical Review D, 46(2), 603-611.Google Scholar
Hawking, S. & Ellis, G. (1973). The Large Scale Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawking, S. & Penrose, R. (1970). The singularities of gravitational collapse and cosmology. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 314(1519), 529-548.Google Scholar
Hawking, S. & Sachs, R. (1974). Causally continuous spacetimes. Communications in Mathematical Physics, 35(4), 287-296.Google Scholar
Hogarth, M. (1992). Does general relativity allow an observer to view an eternity in a finite time? Foundations of Physics Letters, 5(2), 173-181.Google Scholar
Hogarth, M. (1993). Predicting the future in relativistic spacetimes. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 24(5), 721-739.Google Scholar
Hogarth, M. (1997). A remark concerning prediction and spacetime singularities. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 28(1), 63-71.Google Scholar
Hounnonkpe, R. & Minguzzi, E. (2019). Globally hyperbolic spacetimes can be defined without the “causal” condition. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 36(19), 197001.Google Scholar
Krasnikov, S. (2002). No time machines in classical general relativity. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 19(15), 4109-4129.Google Scholar
Krasnikov, S. (2009). Even the Minkowski space is holed. Physical Review D, 79(12), 124041.Google Scholar
Krasnikov, S. (2018). Back-in-Time and Faster-than-Light Travel in General Relativity. Cham: Springer Nature.Google Scholar
Kronheimer, E. & Penrose, R. (1967). On the structure of causal spaces. Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 63(2), 481-501.Google Scholar
Low, R. (2012). Time machines, maximal extensions and Zorn’s lemma. Classical and Quantum Gravity, 29(9), 097001.Google Scholar
Malament, D. (1977a). Observationally indistinguishable space-times. In Earman, J, Glymour, C., & Stachel, J., eds., Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol. 8. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 61-80.Google Scholar
Malament, D. (1977b). The class of continuous timelike curves determines the topology of spacetime. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 18(7), 1399-1404.Google Scholar
Malament, D. (2012). Topics in the Foundations of General Relativity and Newtonian Gravitation Theory. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. (2008). Is prediction possible in general relativity? Foundations of Physics, 38(4), 317-321.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. (2009). Can we know the global structure of spacetime? Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 40(1), 53-56.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. (2011a). What is a physically reasonable spacetime? Philosophy of Science, 78(3), 410-420.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. (2011b). No no go: A remark on time machines. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 42(1), 74-76.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. (2014a). On space-time singularities, holes, and extensions. Philosophy of Science, 81(5), 1066-1076.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. (2014b). Time (hole?) machines. Studies in History and Philosophy ofModern Physics, 48(B), 124-127.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. (2016a). Epistemic “holes” in space-time. Philosophy of Science, 83(2), 265-276.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. (2016b). On Godel and the ideality of time. Philosophy of Science, 83(5), 1050-1058.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. (2016c). Is the universe as large as it can be? Erkenntnis, 81(6), 1341-1344.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. (2018a). Some “no hole” spacetime properties are unstable. Foundations of Physics, 48(11), 1539-1545.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. (2018b). Malament-Hogarth machines. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axy023.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. (2019). A remark on “time machines” in honor of Howard Stein. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 48(1), 111-116.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. (forthcoming). General relativity as a collection of collections of models. Forthcoming in Madarasz, J. & Szekely, G. eds., Hajnal Andreka and Istvan Nemeti on Unity of Science: From Computing to Relativity Theory through Algebraic Logic.Google Scholar
Manchak, J. & Roberts, B. (2016). Supertasks. In E. Zalta, ed., Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/spacetime-supertasks/.Google Scholar
Minguzzi, E. (2012). Causally simple inextendible spacetimes are hole-free. Journal of Mathematical Physics, 53(6), 062501.Google Scholar
Minguzzi, E. (2019). Lorentzian causality theory. Living Reviews in Relativity, 22(1), article 3.Google Scholar
Minguzzi, E. & Sanchez, M. (2008). The causal hierarchy of space- times. In Alekseevsky, D & Baum, H, eds., Recent Developments in Pseudo-Riemannian Geometry. Zurich: European Mathematical Society, 299-358.Google Scholar
Misner, C. (1967). Taub-NUT spacetime as a counterexample to almost anything. In Ehlers, J, ed., Relativity Theory and Astrophysics: l. Relativity and Cosmology, Lectures in Applied Mathematics, vol. 8. Providence, RI: American Mathematical Society, 160-169.Google Scholar
Norton, J. (2011). Observationally indistinguishable spacetimes: A challenge for any inductivist. In Morgan, G, ed., Philosophy of Science Matters: The Philosophy of Peter Achinstein. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 164-176.Google Scholar
O’Neill, B. (1983). Semi-Riemannian Geometry with Applications to Relativity. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1965). Gravitational collapse and space-time singularities. Physical Review Letters, 14(3), 57.Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1968). Structure of spacetime. In DeWitt, C & Wheeler, J, eds., Battelle Rencontres; 1967 Lectures in Mathematics and Physics. New York: Benjamin Inc., 121-235.Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1969). Gravitational collapse: The role of general relativity. Revisita del Nuovo Cimento 1(1): 252-276.Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1972). Techniques of Differential Topology in Relativity. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics.Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1979). Singularities and time-asymmetiy. In Hawking, S & Israel, W, eds., General Relativity: An Einstein Centenary Survey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 581-638.Google Scholar
Penrose, R. (1999). The question of cosmic censorship. Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 20(3-4), 233-248.Google Scholar
Sbierski, J. (2018). On the proof of the C°-inextendibility of the Schwarzschild spacetime. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 968(1), 012012.Google Scholar
- 16
- Cited by