Element contents
The Hedgers
How The Global South Navigates the Sino-American Competition
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2026
Summary
The extreme instability caused by the interminable war in Ukraine, Sino-American tensions, and Trump's return to power raises an essential question: How can the states of the Global South – particularly those endowed with significant resources and full of ambition – navigate this current global turbulence? Are they succumbing to the logic of bipolarity, or are they escaping from it by amplifying their hedging power, and, in the process, making the international system more multipolar? To answer these key questions, we analyze the strategic behavior of eight states: India, Indonesia, Vietnam, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), Qatar, South Africa, and Brazil. Their selection is based on eight precise metrics. It is these eight key states that we call the Hedgers. They are among the countries of the Global South that have good opportunities to navigate – with some challenges – the troubled environment of what is increasingly difficult to call the 'world order.'
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009670258Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 26 March 2026
References
Abdulkhaleq, Abdulla. 2021. The Ukraine Crisis and the Gulf: An Emirati Perspective. institut Montaigne Expressions, www.institutmontaigne.org/en/expressions/ukraine-crisis-and-gulf-emirati-perspective.Google Scholar
Abo El-Kasem, Mahmoud Hamdy. 2024. Saudi Options in Light of US-Chinese Polarization. International Institute for Iranian Studies- Research and Studies (September 2), https://rasanah-iiis.org/english/centre-for-researches-and-studies/saudi-options-in-light-of-us-chinese-polarization/.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
Acharya, Amitav. 2025. The Once and Future World Order: Why Global Civilization Will Survive the Decline of the West. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Aguiar, Paulo. 2024. India-China Border Agreement: A Tactical Step, No Strategic Reset. Geopolitical Monitor (November 7), www.geopoliticalmonitor.com/india-china-border-agreement-tactical-step-no-strategic-reset/.Google Scholar
Allen, Gregory C., Adamson, Georgia, Heim, Lennart, and Winter-Levy, Sam. 2025. The United Arab Emirates’ AI Ambitions. CSIS Report (January 24), www.csis.org/analysis/united-arab-emirates-ai-ambitions.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham. 2017. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’s Trap? Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham. 2020. The New Spheres of Influence: Sharing the Globe with Other Great Powers. Foreign Affairs – Commentary March–April (March–April), www.hks.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/HKSEE/HKSEE%20PDFs/Allison_Spheres%20of%20Influence,%20Foreign%20Affairs,%20March-April%202020.pdf.Google Scholar
Amorim, Celso. 2010. Brazilian Foreign Policy under President Lula (2003–2010): An Overview. Rev. bras. polít. int. 53 (December), https://doi.org/10.1590/S0034-73292010000300013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anand, Abhishek, Chatterjee, Shoumitro, Felman, Josh, Subramanian, Arvind, and Thomas, Naveen. 2025. How Quality Control Orders Are Crippling India’s Trade Competitiveness. Business Standard (March 4), www.business-standard.com/economy/news/how-quality-control-orders-are-crippling-india-s-trade-competitiveness-125030301265_1.html.Google Scholar
Anggina, Neta Cynara. 2024. Indonesia Must Play the Long Game to Transform Its Lagging Labour Force (December 4), https://eastasiaforum.org/2024/12/04/indonesia-must-play-the-long-game-to-transform-its-lagging-labour-force/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anwar, Dewi Fortuna. 2002. Megawati’s Search for an Effective Foreign Policy. In Governance in Indonesia: Challenges Facing the Megawati Presidency, edited by Soesastro, Hadi, Smith, Anthony L. and Han, Mui Ling, 70–90. Singapore: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Shiro, and Quah, Danny. 2023. Economics for the Global Economic Order: The Tragedy of Epic Fail Equilibria. https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.18052v1 [econ.GN] https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2310.18052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aswicahyono, Haryo, and Hill, Hall. 2016. Is Indonesia Trapped in the Middle? In Asia and the Middle-Income Trap, edited by Hutchinson, Francis E. and Basu Das, Sanchita, 101–25. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Baker, Stephanie. 2024. Punishing Putin: Inside the Global Economic War to Bring Down Russia. New York, London, and Toronto: Scribner.Google Scholar
Baldwin, Richard. 2024. China is the World’s Sole Manufacturing Superpower: A Line Sketch of the Rise. CEPR Vox EU (January 17), https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/china-worlds-sole-manufacturing-superpower-line-sketch-rise#:~:text=The%20right%20panel%20shows%20that,not%20report%20gross%20production%20data.Google Scholar
Beckley, Michael. 2023. Delusions of Détente: Why America and China Will Be Enduring Rivals. Foreign Affairs (September/October), www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/china-delusions-detente-rivals.Google Scholar
Berg, Ryan C., and Sady-Kennedy, T. Andrew. 2021. South America’s Lithium Triangle: Opportunities for the Biden Administration. CSIS Commentary (August 17), www.csis.org/analysis/south-americas-lithium-triangle-opportunities-biden-administration.Google Scholar
Bermingham, Finbarr. 2025. Exclusive: China Tells EU It Does Not Want to See Russia Lose Its War in Ukraine: Sources. South China Morning Post. July 4, 2025.Google Scholar
Bertoldi, Moreno, and Buti, Marco. 2025. The US Is Now an Extractive Superpower. Project Syndicate (August 1), www.project-syndicate.org/onpoint/how-the-world-should-deal-with-trump-extractive-foreign-policy-by-moreno-bertoldi-and-marco-buti-2025-08.Google Scholar
Brands, H. W. 1989. The Limits of Manipulation: How the United States Didn’t Topple Sukarno. The Journal of American History 76(3): 785–808, https://doi.org/10.2307/2936421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., and Wohlforth, William C.. 2023. The Myth of Multipolarity: American Power’s Staying Power. Foreign Affairs (May/June), www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/china-multipolarity-myth.Google Scholar
Brooks, Stephen G., and Wohlforth, William C.. 2008. World Out of Balance: International Relations and the Challenge of American Primacy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bunnell, Frederick. 1990. American “Low Posture” Policy toward Indonesia in the Months Leading up to the 1965 “Coup”. Indonesia 50: 29–60, https://doi.org/10.2307/3351229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, E. Bradford. 1966. The Unwritten Alliance: Rio Branco and Brazilian-American Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Steve. 2007. China, the US and the Power-Transition Theory. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Thomas. 2015. The China Challenge: Shaping the Choices of a Rising Power. New York: WW Norton.Google Scholar
Commins, David. 2006. The Wahhabi Mission and Saudi Arabia David Commins. London: I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daigle, Craig A. 2004. The Russians Are Going: Sadat, Nixon and the Soviet Presence in Egypt. Middle East 8(1): 1–15.Google Scholar
De Carvalho, Gustavo. 2025. Middle Power Lawfare: South Africa, International Justice, and the Gaza Crisis. Mémos de l’Institut Français des Relations Internationales (July 21), www.ifri.org/en/memos/middle-power-lawfare-south-africa-international-justice-and-gaza-crisis.Google Scholar
Doshi, Rush. 2021. The Long Game: China’s Grand Strategy to Displace American Order. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fine, Herbert A., Goodwin, Ralph R., Glennon, John P., Churchill, Rogers P., and Evans, Laurence (eds). 2010. Foreign Relations of the United States, 1969, Volume VIII, Part 1, Foreign Relations of the United States: Diplomatic Papers, 1945, The Near East and Africa. Washington: Government Printing Office, Document 1–6.Google Scholar
French, Howard W. 2017. Everything under the Heavens: How the Past Helps Shape China’s Push for Global Power. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Froman, Michael. 2025. Trump’s AI Gamble in the Gulf Reshapes U.S. Tech Strategy. Council on Foreign Relations – The World This Week, www.cfr.org/article/trumps-ai-gamble-gulf-reshapes-us-tech-strategy.Google Scholar
Gantz, David A. 2007. Doi Moi, the VBTA and WTO Accession: The Role of Lawyers in Vietnam’s No Longer Cautious Embrace of Globalization. International Lawyer 41(3): 873–890, https://scholar.smu.edu/til/vol41/iss3/3.Google Scholar
Gause, Gregory C. 2024. The Limits of a U.S.-Saudi Security Dea. Foreign Affairs (August 2), www.foreignaffairs.com/saudi-arabia/limits-us-saudi-security-deal-china-russia.Google Scholar
Gilpin, Robert. 1981. War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge; New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gindarsah, Iis. 2018. Maintaining Maritime Order in the Asia-Pacific. In Maintaining Maritime Order in the Asia-Pacific, edited by The National Institute for Defense Studies, 25–36. Tokyo: The National Institute for Defense Studie.Google Scholar
Glauben, Thomas, and Duric, Ivan. 2024. BRICS: World Heavyweight in Agricultural Trade. Intereconomics 59(3): 160–166, https://doi.org/10.2478/ie-2024-0033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, Evelyn. 2008. Great Powers and Hierarchical Order in Southeast Asia: Analyzing Regional Security Strategies. International Security 32(3): 113–57. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2008.32.3.113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goh, Evelyn. 2007. Southeast Asian perspectives on the China challenge. Journal of Strategic Studies 30(4–5): 809–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390701431915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gokhale, Vijay. 2025. India-China Ties: The Talk and Deter Approach. India Today (January 13), www.indiatoday.in/magazine/cover-story/vision-2025/story/20250113-india-china-ties-the-talk-and-deter-approach-by-vijay-gokhale-india2025-2659197-2025-01-05.Google Scholar
Guimarães, Feliciano. 2022. Brazil: Agribusiness Before Diplomacy – Three questions to Feliciano Guimarães. Institut Montaigne Expressions (June 17), www.institutmontaigne.org/en/expressions/brazil-agribusiness-diplomacy.Google Scholar
Ha, Hoang Thi. 2024. Understanding Vietnam’s Foreign Policy Choices Amid Sino–US Rivalry Trends in Southeast Asia (16), www.iseas.edu.sg/wp-content/uploads/2024/06/TRS16_24.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamidi, Sidra. 2022. Constructing Nuclear Responsibility in US–India Relations. International Affairs 98(2): 707–25, https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiab225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Happymon, Jacob. 2025. India’s Path to Being a Global Power Is Not Through South Asia. India’s World (March 5), https://indiasworld.in/indias-path-to-being-a-global-power-is-not-through-south-asia/.Google Scholar
Hatta, Mohammad. 1953. Indonesia’s Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs 31(3): 441–52, https://doi.org/10.2307/20030977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatta, Mohammad. 1948 (published in 2011). Mendajung Antara Dua Karang. Jakarta: Kementerian Penerangan, Republic of Indonesia.Google Scholar
He, Kai, and Feng, Huiyun. 2023. After Hedging: Hard Choices for the Indo-Pacific States Between the US and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Jorge, Fortin, Carlos, and Ominami, Carlos. 2025. The Non Aligned-World: Striking Out in an Era of Great Power Competition. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hindley, Donald. 1963. Foreign Aid to Indonesia and Its Political Implications. Pacific Affairs 36(2): 107–19, https://doi.org/10.2307/2754184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2018. The End of Liberal International Order? International Affairs 41(1): 7–23.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2011. Liberal Leviathan: The Origins, Crisis, and Transformation of the American World Order, Princeton Studies in International History and Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2024. Three Worlds: The West, East and South and the Competition to Shape Global Order. International Affairs 100(1): 121–38, https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiad284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irawan, Halimah Dewi, and Carnegie, Paul J.. 2025. Different Strokes: Indonesian Statecraft in the North Natuna Sea. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034251347973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaffrelot, Christophe. 2025. Who Is India’s All-Weather Friend in This World? The Wire (June 17), https://thewire.in/politics/who-is-indias-all-weather-friend-in-this-world.Google Scholar
Jaishankar, S. 2020. The India Way: Strategies for an Uncertain World. Gurugram: HarpersCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
Jones, Toby Craig. 2006. Rebellion on the Saudi Periphery: Modernity, Marginalization, and The Shia Uprising of 1979. International Journal of Middle East Studies 38(2): 213–33, https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020743806412320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, Robert. 2018. The Jungle Grows Back: America and Our Imperiled World. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Khilnani, Sunil, Kumar, Rajiv, Mehta, Pratap Bhanu, Menon, Prakash, Nilekani, Nandan, Raghavan, Srinath, Saran, Shyam, and Varadarajan, Siddharth. 2012. Non Alignment 2.0: A Foreign & Strategic Policy for India in the 21st Century. New Delhi: Penguin Viking.Google Scholar
Kiessling, Christopher Kurt. 2018. Brazil, Foreign Policy and Climate Change (1992–2005). Contexto Internacional 40(2), https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-8529.2018400200004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koenig, Nicole, and Kump, Isabell. 2025. Brazil: Lula Land. In Munich Security Report 2025: Multipolarization, edited by Bunde, Tobias, Eisentraut, Sophie and Schütte, Leonard, 103–09. Munich: Munich Security Conference.Google Scholar
Koga, Kei. 2018. The Concept of “Hedging” Revisited: The Case of Japan’s Foreign Policy Strategy in East Asia’s Power Shift. International Studies Review 20(4): 633–60, https://doi.org/10.1093/isr/vix059.Google Scholar
Kuik, Cheng-Chwee. 2008. The Essence of Hedging: Malaysia and Singapore’s Response to a Rising China. Contemporary Southeast Asia 30(2): 159–85, www.jstor.org/stable/41220503.Google Scholar
Kuik, Cheng-Chwee. 2021. Getting Hedging Right: A Small-state Perspective. China International Strategy Review 3(2): 300–15, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42533-021-00089-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuik, Cheng-Chwee. 2024. Researching Middle-State Alignment Choices: Blind Spots and Bright Spots November 12, Research Presentation at the Taipei School of Economics and Political Science (National Tsinghua University, Hsinchu).Google Scholar
Kuik, Cheng-Chwee, and Meng Lai, Yew. 2025. Deference and Defiance in Malaysia’s China Policy: Determinants of a Dualistic Diplomacy. International Journal of Asian Studies 22(1): 5–24, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1479591423000104.Google Scholar
Kuik, Cheng-Chwee, and Nur Shahadah, Jamil. 2024. The Feasibility and Future of Middle-state Hedging. East Asian Policy 16(04): 7–28, https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793930524000254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuik, Cheng-Chwee, and Razak Ahmad, Abdul. 2025. The Geopolitics of BRICS: Between (and Beyond) Institutional Balancing and Institutional Hedging. IKMAS Working Papers Series (February), www.ukm.my/ikmas/publication/8950-2/.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laïdi, Zaki. 2003. Après Cancun: l’OMC en danger ? Critique Internationale 4(21): 33–41, https://shs.cairn.info/revue-critique-internationale-2003-4-page-33?lang=fr.Google Scholar
Laïdi, Zaki. 2012a. Limited Achievements: Obama’s Foreign Policy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laïdi, Zaki. 2012b. BRICS: Sovereignty Power and Weakness. International Politics 49(5): 614–32, https://doi.org/10.1057/ip.2012.17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laïdi, Zaki. 2008. Norms over Force: The Enigma of European Power. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laïdi, Zaki. 2018. Reading Olson to Understand Trump: Multipolarity without Multilateralism? Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies Policy Papers (RSCAS PP 2018/02), https://sciencespo.hal.science/hal-03458426v1/file/rscas-pp-2018-02.pdf.Google Scholar
Laïdi, Zaki. 1990. The Superpowers and Africa: The Constraints of a Rivalry, 1960–1990. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Lake, David A. 1996. Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations. International Organization 50(1): 1–33, https://doi.org/10.1017/S002081830000165X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lake, David A. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations, Cornell Studies in Political Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Laksmana, Evan A., and Alexandra, Lina A., eds. 2022. Hatta and Indonesia’s Independent and Active Foreign Policy: Retrospect and Prospect. Jakarta: Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Larson, Deborah Welch, and Shevchenko, Alexei. 2010. Status Seekers: Chinese and Russian Responses to U.S. Primacy. International Security 34(4): 63–95, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.2010.34.4.63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, Mingjiang, Le, Hong Hiep, Ngeow, Chow Bing, and Neak, Chandarith. 2025. How Southeast Asia Sees Xi Jinping’s Regional Push Amid U.S.-China Tensions. Carnegie China Article (April 22), https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2025/04/how-southeast-asia-sees-xi-jinpings-regional-push-amid-us-china-tensions?lang=en.Google Scholar
Lind, Jennifer. 2024. Back to Bipolarity: How China’s Rise Transformed the Balance of Power. International Security 49(2): 7–55, https://doi.org/10.1162/isec_a_00494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacMahon, Robert Ed. 2023. The Sunni-Shia Divide. Council on Foreign Relations – Infoguide (April 27), www.cfr.org/article/sunni-shia-divide.Google Scholar
Madan, Tanvi. 2020. Fateful Triangle: How China Shaped US-India Relations During the Cold War. Gurgaon: Penguin Random House India.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahbubani, Kishore. 2013. The Great Convergence: Asia, the West, and the Logic of One World. 1st ed. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Maiorano, Diego, and Kaur, Kanika. 2024. India’s Role in the BRICS: Navigating the Balance in a Changing World. ISAS Insights (November 13), www.isas.nus.edu.sg/papers/indias-role-in-the-brics-navigating-the-balance-in-a-changing-world/.Google Scholar
Marcondes, Danilo, and Ruy de Almeida Silva, Antonio. 2023. The Role of Brazil in the Russia-Ukraine Conflict: A Potential Peace Enabler? SIPA Journal of International Affairs 75(2), https://jia.sipa.columbia.edu/content/role-brazil-russia-ukraine-conflict-potential-peace-enabler.Google Scholar
Martinus, Melinda. 2025. Indonesia’s Probable Foreign Policy Shift from the West under a Prabowo Administration. ISEAS Perspective (No. 12 (February)): 1–12, www.iseas.edu.sg/articles-commentaries/iseas-perspective/2025-12-indonesias-probable-foreign-policy-shift-from-the-west-under-a-prabowo-administration-by-melinda-martinus/.Google Scholar
McFarland, Victor. 2020. Oil Powers: A History of the U.S.-Saudi Alliance. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2018. The Great Delusion: Liberal Dreams and International Realities. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2021. The Inevitable Rivalry: America, China, and the Tragedy of Great-Power Politics. Foreign Affairs (November/December), www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/china/2021-10-19/inevitable-rivalry-cold-war.Google Scholar
Mearsheimer, John J. 2014. The Tragedy of Great Power Politics: Updated Edition. Edited by John, J., 1st ed. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Mehta, Pratap Bhanu. 2025. Pratap Bhanu Mehta Writes: India’s Delusion of Relevance. The Indian Express (February 1), https://indianexpress.com/article/opinion/columns/pratap-bhanu-mehta-writes-indias-delusion-of-relevance-9810515/.Google Scholar
Menon, Shivshankar. 2021. India and Asian Geopolitics: The Past, Present. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milani, Carlos R. S., and Almeida Freitas, Cristina. 2011. Les rapports Brésil-Etats-Unis: quelle complémentarité? Annuaire français de relations internationales V(12): 609–30.Google Scholar
Milton, Sansom, and Elkahlout, Ghassan. 2025. Gulf to Global: The Rise of Qatar in Conflict Mediation, Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies SEries. New York: Hurst Publishers.Google Scholar
Nadadur, Gopal. 2024. India Sees Uncertainty but Also Opportunities for Trade. New Atlanticist What the World Thinks of Trump’s Return to the US Presidency (November 8), www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/new-atlanticist/what-the-world-thinks-of-trumps-return-to-the-us-presidency/#india.Google Scholar
Nasr, Vali. 2025. The New Balance of Power in the Middle East. Foreign Affairs (June 10), www.foreignaffairs.com/israel/new-balance-power-middle-east-iran.Google Scholar
Nayudu, Swapna Kona. 2025. The Nehru Years: An International History of Indian Non-Alignment. New Delhi: Juggernaut.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nehru, Jawaharlal. 1967. Jawaharlal Nehru’s Speeches. Vol. 1. New Delhi: Publications Division, Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, Govt. of India.Google Scholar
Ngundu, Marvellous. 2025. South Africa’s Trade Deficit Dilemma with China. Institute for Security Studies Today (March 5), https://issafrica.org/iss-today/south-africa-s-trade-deficit-dilemma-with-china.Google Scholar
Niblett, Robin. 2024. The New Cold War: How the Contest between the US and China Will Shape Our Century. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
Ottaway, David. 2009. The U.S and Saudi Arabia Since the 1930s. Foreign Policy Research Institute Insights (August 28), www.fpri.org/article/2009/08/the-u-s-and-saudi-arabia-since-the-1930s/.Google Scholar
Pant, Harsh V. 2007. The US–India Nuclear Deal: The Beginning of a Beautiful Relationship? Cambridge Review of International Affairs 20(3): 455–72, https://doi.org/10.1080/09557570701574162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pant, Harsh V., and Wani, Ayjaz. 2024. India’s Balancing Act in the SCO. Observer Research Foundation Commentaries (July 9), www.orfonline.org/research/india-s-balancing-act-in-the-sco.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V. 1994. Asymmetric Conflicts: War Initiation by Weaker Powers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V. 2018. Restraining Great Powers: Soft Balancing from Empires to the Global Era. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V. 2024. The Unfinished Quest: India’s Search for Major Power Status from Nehru to Modi. New York City: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V., and Kornprobst, Markus, eds. 2025. The New Cold War and the Remaking of Regions. Washinghton, DC: Georgetown University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, T. V., and Shankar, Mahesh. 2011. Why the US–India Nuclear Accord Is a Good Deal. Survival 49: 111–22, https://doi.org/10.1080/00396330701733951.Google Scholar
Paul, T. V., Larson, Deborah Welch, and Wohlforth, William C., eds. 2014. Status in World Politics. Cambridge and New York City: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiang, Zhai. 1999. Opposing Negotiations: China and the Vietnam Peace Talks, 1965–1968Opposing Negotiations: China and the Vietnam Peace Talks, 1965–1968. Pacific Historical Review 68(1), https://doi.org/10.2307/3641868.Google Scholar
Quadros, Jânio. 1961. Brazil’s New Foreign Policy. Foreign Affairs (October 1), www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/brazil/1961-10-01/brazils-new-foreign-policy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rachman, Gideon. 2024. China, America and a Global Struggle for Power and Influence: The Whole World Risks Losing from the Rivalry between Washington and Beijing. The Financial Times (September 16), www.ft.com/content/78f303a9-15dd-497b-a2b5-f6926492f71e.Google Scholar
Riedel, Bruce. 2015. JFK’s Forgotten Crisis: Tibet, the CIA, and Sino-Indian War. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudd, Kevin. 2022. The Avoidable War: The Dangers of a Catastrophic Conflict between the US and Xi Jinping’s China. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
Sahai, Dhananjay, and Khurana, Prashant. 2025. India’s Control of Chinese Investment Inflows: The Way Forward. India’s World (March 3), https://indiasworld.in/indias-control-of-chinese-investment-inflows-the-way-forward/.Google Scholar
Sanger, David E. 2024. New Cold Wars: China’s Rise, Russia’s Invasion, and America’s Struggle to Defend the West. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Saran, Shyam. 2017. How India Sees the World: Kautilya to the 21st Century. New Delhi: Juggernaut Books.Google Scholar
Scholz, Olaf. 2023. Speech by Chancellor Scholz at the Global Solutions Summit on 15 May 2023 in Berlin, www.bundesregierung.de/breg-en/service/archive/speech-global-solutions-summit-2191028.Google Scholar
Schweller, Randall. 2006. Unanswered Threats: Political Constraints on the Balance of Power. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sciutto, Jim. 2024. The Return of Great Powers: Russia, China, and the Next World War. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar
Seah, S., Melinda, Martinus, Pham Thi Phuong, Thao, Indira, Aridati, Joanne, Lin, Kristina, Fong, and Damon, Chee. 2024. The State of Southeast Asia: 2024 Survey Report. Singapore: ISEAS – Yusof Ishak Institute.Google Scholar
Sidore, Sarang. 2025. Spheres of Influence Are Not the Answer. Foreign Policy (May 28), https://foreignpolicy.com/2025/05/28/spheres-of-influence-great-powers/.Google Scholar
Skylar Mastro, Oriana. 2024. Upstart: How China Became a Great Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spektor, Matias. 2024. What Happened to Lula? Foreign Affairs (February 28), www.foreignaffairs.com/brazil/what-happened-lula.Google Scholar
Spence, Michael. 2011. The Next Convergence: The Future of Economic Growth in a Multispeed World. New York: Picador – Farrar, Strauss, and Giroux.Google Scholar
Tan, See Seng, and Acharya, Amitav, eds. 2008. Bandung Revisited: The Legacy of the 1955 Asian-African Conference for International Order. Singapore: NUS Press.Google Scholar
Tellis, Ashley. 2025a. Great Expectations: India Amid U.S.-China Competition. In Lessons from the New Cold War: America Confronts the China Challenge, edited by Brands, Hal. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Tellis, Ashley. 2025b. India’s Great-Power Delusions. Foreign Affairs (June 17), www.foreignaffairs.com/india/indias-great-power-delusions.Google Scholar
Tellis, Ashley. 2021. Non-Allied Forever: India’s Grand Strategy According to Subrahmanyam Jaishankar. Commentary – Carnegie Endowment (March 3), https://carnegieendowment.org/posts/2021/03/non-allied-forever-indias-grand-strategy-according-to-subrahmanyam-jaishankar?lang=en.Google Scholar
Tharoor, Shashi. 2025. India’s Soft Power Balances Ancient Wisdom and Modern Multi-Alignment: Dr. Shashi Tharoor at 10th Dr. L. M. Singhvi Memorial Lecture. Law School News (March 21), https://jgu.edu.in/jgls/news/indias-soft-power-balances-ancient-wisdom-and-modern-multi-alignment.Google Scholar
Tiberghien, Yves. 2021. Asia’s Rise and the Transition to a Post-Western Global Order. In The Decline of the Western-Centric World and the Emerging New Global Order: Contending Views, edited by Chu, Yun-Han and Zheng, Yongnian, 357–78. Oxon and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tiberghien, Yves. ed. 2013. Leadership in Global Institution Building: Minerva’s Rule, Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timofte, Cosmin. 2022. Between a Rock and a Hard Place: The UAE and Saudi Arabia Face the Pressure over Ukraine War. Institute of New Europe – Analysis (June 27), https://ine.org.pl/en/between-a-rock-and-a-hard-place-the-uae-and-saudi-arabia-face-the-pressure-over-ukraine-war/.Google Scholar
Toft, Monica Duffy. 2025. The Return of Spheres of Influence. Foreign Affairs (March 17), www.foreignaffairs.com/united-states/return-spheres-influence.Google Scholar
Tritto, Angela. 2020. Contentious Embeddedness: Chinese State Capital and the Belt and Road Initiative in Indonesia. Made in China Journal 5: 182–87, https://doi.org/10.22459/MIC.05.01.2020.24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tunsjø, Øystein. 2018. The Return of Bipolarity in World Politics: China, the United States, and Geostructural Realism. New York City: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaid, Manish. 2025. Russia’s Energy Pivot: India Replaces China as Key Energy Ally. Observer Research Foundation – Raisina Debates (May 30), www.orfonline.org/expert-speak/russia-s-energy-pivot-india-replaces-china-as-key-energy-ally.Google Scholar
Vakulenko, Sergey. 2024. Russia’s Great Energy Game in the Middle East. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace – Research Article (November 12), https://carnegieendowment.org/research/2024/11/russias-great-energy-game-in-the-middle-east?lang=en.Google Scholar
Vigevani, Tullo, and Fernandes de Oliveira, Marcelo. 2007. Brazilian Foreign Policy in the Cardoso Era: The Search for Autonomy through Integration. Latin American Perspectives 34(5): 58–80, https://doi.org/10.1177/0094582X07306164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vizentini, P. F. 2006. From FHC to Lula: A Decade of Foreign Politics (1995–2005). Civitas: Journal of Social Sciences 5(2): 381–97, https://doi.org/10.15448/1984-7289.2005.2.9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vuving, Alexander L. 2025. Bamboo in a Storm: The Russia-Ukraine War and Vietnam’s Foreign Policy (2022–2024). The Pacific Review 38(1): 90–118, https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2024.2354673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 2018. The Hell of Good Intentions: America’s Foreign Policy Elite and the Decline of US Primacy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Walt, Stephen M. 1987. The Origins of Alliances, Cornell Studies in Security Affairs. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Westad, Odd Arne. 2024. Sleepwalking Toward War: Will America and China Heed the Warnings of Twentieth-Century Catastrophe? Foreign Affairs (July/August), www.foreignaffairs.com/china/sleepwalking-toward-war-united-states.Google Scholar
Womack, Brantly. 2006. China and Vietnam: The Politics of Asymmetry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zilla, Claudia. 2017. Brazil’s Foreign Policy under Lula. SWP Research Paper 2017(RP 02), www.swp-berlin.org/en/publication/brazils-foreign-policy-under-lula/.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.0 A
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this element
conforms to version 2.0 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), ensuring core accessibility principles are addressed and meets the basic
(A)
level of WCAG compliance, addressing essential accessibility barriers.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of high contrast between text and background colour
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
You benefit from high‐contrast text, which improves legibility if you have low vision or if you are reading in less‐than‐ideal lighting conditions.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.