Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-7d684dbfc8-lxvtp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-09-23T19:28:43.530Z Has data issue: false Feature Flags: { "corePageComponentGetUserInfoFromSharedSession": true, "coreDisableEcommerce": false, "coreDisableSocialShare": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForArticlePurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForBookPurchase": false, "coreDisableEcommerceForElementPurchase": false, "coreUseNewShare": true, "useRatesEcommerce": true } hasContentIssue false

Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Multiple Goals

A Multiple Goals Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2021

Pino G. Audia
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
Henrich R. Greve
INSEAD, Singapore


This Element synthesizes the current state of research on organizational learning from performance feedback and develops a new perspective that deals with the influence of multiple goals. In keeping with the centrality of motives in Cyert & March's influential model, this new perspective rests on a foundation of individual level behaviors that are responsive to mechanisms at the organizational and environmental level of analysis. A key aim is to lay out an agenda for a new wave of empirical research on the interconnections of decision-makers, organizations, and the environment that influence organizational responses to performance.
Get access
Online ISBN: 9781108344289
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 18 February 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Anand, B. N., Barnett, K. F., and Carpenter, E. L. 2007 “Random House.” Harvard Business School Publishing, Case no. 9–704–438.Google Scholar
Anand, B. N., Rukstad, M. G., and Kostring, C. 2005 “Bertelsmann AG.” Harvard Business School Publishing, Case no. 9–703–405.Google Scholar
Argote, L. and Miron-Spektor, E. 2011Organizational learning: From experience to knowledge.Organization Science, 22: 11231137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audia, P. G. and Brion, S. 2007Reluctant to change: Self-enhancing responses to diverging performance measures.Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 102: 255269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audia, P. G., Brion, S., and Greve, H. R. 2015 “Self-assessment, self-enhancement, and the choice of comparison organizations for evaluating organizational performance.” Advances in Strategic Management: Cognition and Strategy, 35: 89118.Google Scholar
Audia, P. G. and Goncalo, J. A. 2007Past success and creativity over time: A study of inventors in the hard disk drive industry.Management Science, 53: 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audia, P. G. and Greve, H. R. 2006Less likely to fail? Low performance, firm size, and factory expansion in the shipbuilding industry.Management Science, 52: 8394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Audia, P. G., Locke, E. A., and Smith, K. G. 2000The paradox of success: An archival and a laboratory study of strategic persistence following a radical environmental change.Academy of Management Journal, 43: 837853.Google Scholar
Audia, P. G., Rousseau, H. E., and Brion, S. 2021 “CEO power and nonconforming reference group selection.” Organization Science, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Audia, P. G. and Sorenson, O. 2001 “A multilevel analysis of organizational success and inertia.” London School of Business: Manuscript.Google Scholar
Barnard, C. I. 1938 The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, W. P., Greve, H. R., and Park, D. Y. 1994An evolutionary model of organizational performance.Strategic Management Journal, 15: 1128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, T. and Child, C. 2011Movements, markets and fields: The effects of anti-sweatshop campaigns on U.S. firms, 1993–2000.Social Forces, 90: 425451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Battilana, J. and Dorado, S. 2010Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations.Academy of Management Journal, 53: 14191440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, J. A. C. and Dahlin, K. B. 2007Aspiration performance and railroads’ patterns of learning from train wrecks and crashes.Organization Science, 18: 368385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, J. A. C., Rowley, T. J., Shipilov, A. V., and Chuang, Y.-T. 2005Dancing with strangers: Aspiration performance and the search for underwriting syndicate partners.Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 536575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benner, M. J. and Tripsas, M. 2012The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: the evolution of digital cameras.Strategic Management Journal, 33: 277302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, J. M. 2016Balancing on the creative highwire: Forecasting the success of novel ideas in organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly, 61: 433468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bidwell, M. 2011Paying more to get less: The effects of external hiring versus internal mobility.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 56: 369407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blagoeva, R. R., Mom, T. J., Jansen, J. J., and George, G. 2020Problem-solving or self-enhancement? A power perspective on how CEOs affect R&D search in the face of inconsistent feedback.Academy of Management Journal, 63: 332355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. M. 1955 The Dynamics of Bureaucracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Blettner, D. P., He, Z.-L., Hu, S., and Bettis, R. A. 2015Adaptive aspirations and performance heterogeneity: Attention allocation among multiple reference points.Strategic Management Journal, 36: 9871005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boeker, W. 1989The development and institutionalization of subunit power in organizations.Administrative Science Quarterly, 34: 388410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boone, C. and Özcan, S. 2016Ideological purity vs. hybridization trade-off: When do Islamic banks hire managers from conventional banking?Organization Science, 27: 13801396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, F., Chin, M. K., and Hambrick, D. C. 2014CEO ideology as an element of the corporate opportunity structure for social activists.Academy of Management Journal, 57: 17861809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Briscoe, F. and Gupta, A. 2016Social activism in and around organizations.The Academy of Management Annals, 10: 671727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromiley, P. 1991Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance.Academy of Management Journal, 34: 3759.Google Scholar
Bromiley, P. and Harris, J. D. 2014A comparison of alternative measures of organizational aspirations.Strategic Management Journal, 35: 338357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bromley, P. and Meyer, J. W. 2015 Hyper-organization: Global Organizational Expansion. Oxford University Press.
Burt, R. S., Christman, K. P., and Kilburn, H. C. 1980Testing a structural theory of corporate cooptation: Interorganizational directorate ties as a strategy for avoiding market constraints on profits.American Sociological Review, 45: 821841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, W. K. and Sedikides, C. 1999Self-threat magnifies the self-serving bias: A meta-analytic integration.Review of General Psychology, 3: 2343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castilla, E. J. 2015Accounting for the gap: A firm study manipulating organizational accountability and transparency in pay decisions.Organization Science, 26: 311333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chadwick, P. 1992 A Psychological Study of Paranoia and Delusional Thinking. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., and Toffel, M. W. 2009How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility?Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18: 125169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatterji, A. K. and Toffel, M. W. 2010How firms respond to being rated.Strategic Management Journal, 31: 917945.Google Scholar
Christensen, C. M. and Bower, J. L. 1996Customer power, strategic investment, and the failure of leading firms.Strategic Management Journal, 17: 197218.3.0.CO;2-U>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P. 1972A garbage can model of organizational choice.Administrative Science Quarterly, 17: 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cyert, R. M. and March, J. G. 1963 A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Davis, G. F., McAdam, D., Scott, W. R., and Zald, M. N. 2005 Social Movements and Organization Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, G. F. and Mizruchi, M. S. 1999The money center cannot hold: Commercial banks in the U. S. system of governance.Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 215239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delmas, M. A. and Toffel, M. W. 2008Organizational responses to environmental demands: opening the black box.Strategic Management Journal, 29: 10271055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, V. M. 2008Constrained growth: How experience, legitimacy, and age influence risk taking in organizations.Organization Science, 19: 594608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desai, V. M. 2014The impact of media information on issue salience following other organizations’ failures.” Journal of Management, 40: 893918.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiMaggio, P. J. and Powell, W. W. 1983The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields.American Sociological Review, 48: 147160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diwas, K. C., Staats, B. R., and Gino, F. 2013Learning from my success and from others’ failure: Evidence from minimally invasive cardiac surgery.Management Science, 59: 24352449.Google Scholar
Dunning, D., Meyerowitz, J. A., and Holzberg, A. D. 1989Ambiguity and self-evaluation: The role of idiosyncratic trait definitions in self-serving assessments of ability.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 1082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durand, R., Rao, H., and Monin, P. 2007Code and conduct in French cuisine: Impact of code changes on external evaluations.Strategic Management Journal, 28: 455472.
Edelman, L. B. 1992Legal ambiguity and symbolic structures: Organizational mediation of civil rights law.American Journal of Sociology, 97: 15311576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, R. 1979 Contested Terrain: The Transformation of the Workplace in the Twentieth Century. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Elsbach, K. D. and Kramer, R. M. 1996Members’ responses to organizational identity threats: Countering the business week rankings.Administrative Science Quarterly, 41: 442476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elvira, M. M. and Graham, M. E. 2002 “Not just a formality: Pay system formalization and sex-related earnings effects.” Organization Science, 13: 601–617.
Felson, R. B. 1981 “Self-and reflected appraisal among football players: A test of the Meadian hypothesis.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 44: 116126.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. 1954A theory of social comparison processes.Human Relations, 7: 117140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiegenbaum, A. 1990Prospect theory and the risk-return association.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 14: 184203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiegenbaum, A. and Thomas, H. 1988Attitudes towards risk and the risk return paradox: Prospect theory explanations.Academy of Management Journal, 31: 395407.Google Scholar
Friedland, R. and Alford, R. 1991Bringing society back: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions.” In Powell, W. W., and DiMaggio, P. (eds.), The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis: 232263. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Gaba, V. and Greve, H. R. 2019Safe or profitable? The pursuit of conflicting goals.Organization Science, 30: 647667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaba, V. and Joseph, J. 2013Corporate structure and performance feedback: Aspirations and adaptation in m-form firms.Organization Science, 24: 11021119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gavetti, G., Greve, H. R., Levinthal, D. A., and Ocasio, W. 2012The behavioral theory of the firm: Assessment and prospects.Academy of Management Annals, 6: 140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, R. 1998Incentives in organizations.Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12: 115132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Govindarajan, V. 1988A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy.Academy of management Journal, 31: 828853.Google Scholar
Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., and Lounsbury, M. 2011Institutional complexity and organizational responses.Academy of Management Annals, 5: 317371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, H. R. 1998Performance, aspirations, and risky organizational change.Administrative Science Quarterly, 44: 5886.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, H. R. 2003a “A behavioral theory of R&D expenditures and innovation: Evidence from shipbuilding.” Academy of Management Journal, 46: 685702.Google Scholar
Greve, H. R. 2003b “Investment and the behavioral theory of the firm: Evidence from shipbuilding.Industrial and Corporate Change, 12: 10511076.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, H. R. 2003c Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, H. R. 2008A behavioral theory of firm growth: Sequential attention to size and performance goals.” Academy of Management Journal, 51: 476494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, H. R. 2011Positional rigidity: Low performance and resource acquisition in large and small firms.” Strategic Management Journal, 32: 103114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greve, H. R. and Gaba, V. 2020Performance feedback in organizations and groups: common themes.” In Argote, L., and Levine, J. (eds.), Handbook of Group and Organizational Learning: 315–336. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Greve, H. R. and Song, S. Y. 2017Amazon warrior: How a platform can restructure industry power and ecology.Advances in Strategic Management, 37: 299335.Google Scholar
Greve, H. R. and Teh, D. 2018Goal selection internally and externally: A behavioral theory of institutionalization.International Journal of Management Reviews, 20: S19S38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guinote, A. 2017 “How Power Affects People: Activating, wanting, and goal seeking.” Annual Review of Psychology, 68: 353–381.
Gulati, R. and Gargiulo, M. 1999Where do interorganizational networks come from?American Journal of Sociology, 104: 14391493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haunschild, P. R. and Rhee, M. 2004The role of volition in organizational learning: The case of automotive product recalls.Management Science, 50: 15451560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J., and Stathatos, P. 1997 “The affirmative action stigma of incompetence: Effects of performance information ambiguity.” Academy of Management Journal, 40: 603–625.
Hillman, A. J. 2005Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line?Journal of Management, 31: 464481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., and Collins, B. J. 2009Resource dependence theory: A review.Journal of Management, 35: 14041427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinings, B. and Meyer, R. E. 2018 Starting Points: Intellectual and Institutional Foundations of Organization Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hitt, M. A., Beamish, P. W., Jackson, S. E., and Mathieu, J. E. 2007Building theoretical and empirical bridges across levels: Multilevel research in management.Academy of Management Journal, 50: 13851399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoffman, A. J. 1999Institutional evolution and change: Environmentalism and the U.S. chemical industry.Academy of Management Journal, 42: 351371.Google Scholar
Hsu, G., Roberts, P. W., and Swaminathan, A. 2012Evaluative schemas and the mediating role of critics.Organization Science, 23: 8397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, S. and Bettis, R. A. 2018Multiple organization goals with feedback from shared technological task environments.Organization Science, 29: 873889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, A. H. and Audia, P. G. 2012Self-enhancement and learning from performance feedback.Academy of Management Review, 37: 211231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, J. and Gaba, V. 2015The fog of feedback: Ambiguity and firm responses to multiple aspiration levels.Strategic Management Journal, 36: 19601978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, J., Klingebiel, R., and Wilson, A. J. 2016Organizational structure and performance feedback: Centralization, aspirations, and termination decisions.Organization Science, 27: 10651083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joseph, J., Ocasio, W., and McDonnell, M.-H. 2014The structural elaboration of board independence: Executive power, institutional logics, and the adoption of CEO-only board structures in U.S. corporate governance.Academy of Management Journal, 57: 18341858.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kacperczyk, A., Beckman, C. M., and Moliterno, T. P. 2015Disentangling risk and change: Internal and external social comparison in the mutual fund industry.Administrative Science Quarterly, 60: 228262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. 1979Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk.Econometrica, 47: 263291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, K. J. 2003 “Godoff gone at Random.” New York Post.Google Scholar
Keltner, D., Gruenfeld, D. H., and Anderson, C. 2003 “Power, approach, and inhibition.” Psychological Review, 110: 265–284.
Kirkpatrick, D. D. 2003 “Searching for motives in Random House ouster.” New York Times.Google Scholar
Kleinbaum, A. M. 2012Organizational misfits and the origins of brokerage in intrafirm networks.Administrative Science Quarterly, 57: 407452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolker, R. 2001 “Waiting for Godoff.” New York Magazine.Google Scholar
Kotiloglu, S., Chen, Y., and Lechler, T. 2019Organizational Responses to Performance Feedback: A Meta-Analytic Review.Strategic Organization, forthcoming.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. 1987Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53: 636–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Z. 1990The case for motivated reasoning.Psychological Bulletin, 108: 480–498.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lant, T. K. 1992Aspiration level adaptation: An empirical exploration.Management Science, 38: 623644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lant, T. K., Milliken, F. J., and Batra, B. 1992The role of managerial learning and interpretation in strategic persistence and reorientation: An empirical exploration.Strategic Management Journal, 13: 585608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehman, D. W., Hahn, J., Ramanujam, R., and Alge, B. J. 2011The dynamics of the performance-risk relationship within a performance period: The moderating role of deadline proximity.Organization Science, 22: 16131630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinthal, D. A. 1991Random walks and organizational mortality.Administrative Science Quarterly, 36: 397420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levinthal, D. A. and March, J. G. 1993The myopia of learning.Strategic Management Journal, 14: 95112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, B. and March, J. G. 1988Organizational learning.” In Scott, W. R., and Blake, J. (eds.), Annual Review of Sociology, 14: 319340. Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.Google Scholar
Lopes, L. L. 1987Between hope and fear: The psychology of risk.Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20: 255295.Google Scholar
Lounsbury, M. 2001Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs.Administrative Science Quarterly, 46: 2956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, G. J., Knoben, J., and Meeus, M. T. 2018Contradictory yet coherent? Inconsistency in performance feedback and R&D investment change.Journal of Management, 44: 658681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malter, D. 2014On the causality and cause of returns to organizational status: Evidence from the Grands Crus Classés of the Médoc.Administrative Science Quarterly, 59: 271300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manns, C. L. and March, J. G. 1978Financial adversity, internal competition, and curriculum change in a university.Administrative Science Quarterly, 23: 541552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. 1978Bounded rationality, ambiguity, and the engineering of choice.Bell Journal of Economics, 9: 587608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. and Shapira, Z. 1992Variable risk preferences and the focus of attention.Psychological Review, 99: 172183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
March, J. G. and Simon, H. 1958 Organizations. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Mautner, G. and Learmonth, M. 2020From administrator to CEO: Exploring changing representations of hierarchy and prestige in a diachronic corpus of academic management writing.Discourse and Communication, 14: 273293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazmanian, M. and Beckman, C. M. 2018 “‘Making’ your numbers: Engendering organizational control through a ritual of quantification.” Organization Science, 29: 357379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. W. and Rowan, B. 1977Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony.American Journal of Sociology, 83: 340363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, J. W., Scott, W. R., and Strang, D. 1987Centralization, fragmentation, and school district complexity.Administrative Science Quarterly, 32: 186201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mezias, S. J., Chen, Y. R., and Murphy, P. R. 2002Aspiration-level adaptation in an American financial services organization: A field study.Management Science, 48: 12851300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. and Chen, M.-J. 1994 “Sources and consequences of competitive inertia: A study of the U.S. airline industry.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 1–23.
Mintzberg, H. 1979 The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Moliterno, T. P., Beck, N., Beckman, C. M., and Meyer, M. 2014Knowing your place: Social performance feedback in good times and bad times.Organization Science, 25: 16841702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgeson, F. P. and Hofmann, D. A. 1999The structure and function of collective constructs: Implications for multilevel research and theory development.Academy of Management Review, 24: 249265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocasio, W. 1997Towards an attention-based theory of the firm.Strategic Management Journal, 18: 187206.3.0.CO;2-K>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen-Smith, J. and Powell, W. W. 2001To patent or not: Faculty decisions and institutional success at technology transfer.The Journal of Technology Transfer, 26: 99114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pache, A.-C. and Santos, F. 2010When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands.Academy of Management Review, 35: 455476.Google Scholar
Park, S. H., Westphal, J. D., and Stern, I. 2011 “Set up for a fall: The insidious effect of flattery and opinion conformity toward corporate leaders.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 56: 257–302.
Pfeffer, J. 1981 Power in Organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. and Fong, C. T. 2005Building organization theory from first principles: The self-enhancement motive and understanding power and influence.Organization Science, 16: 372388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J. and Salancik, G. R. 1978 The External Control of Organizations. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Posen, H. E., Keil, T., Kim, S., and Meissner, F. D. 2018 “Renewing research on problemistic search—A review and research agenda.” Academy of Management Annals, 12: 208–251.
Purdy, J. M. and Gray, B. 2009Conflicting logics, mechanisms of diffusion, and multilevel dynamics in emerging institutional fields.Academy of Management Journal, 52: 355380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowley, T. I., Shipilov, A. V., and Greve, H. R. 2017Board reform versus profits: The effect of rankings on the adoption of governance practices.Strategic Management Journal, 38: 815833.Google Scholar
Ruefli, T. W. 1990Mean-variance approaches to risk-return relationships in strategy: Paradox lost.Management Science, 36: 368380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salancik, G. R. and Pfeffer, J. 1974The bases and use of power in organizational decision making: The case of a university.Administrative Science Quarterly, 19: 453473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauder, M. 2006Third parties and status position: How the characteristics of status systems matter.Theory and Society, 35: 299321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sauder, M. and Espeland, W. N. 2009The discipline of rankings: Tight coupling and organizational change.American Sociological Review, 74: 6382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, W. R. 1987 Organizations: Rational, Natural and Open Systems, 2nd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Sedikides, C. and Strube, M. J. 1997 “Self evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology: 29: 209–269.Google Scholar
Sengul, M. and Gimeno, J. 2013Constrained delegation: Limiting subsidiaries’ decision rights and resources in firms that compete across multiple industries.Administrative Science Quarterly, 58: 420471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharkey, A. J. and Bromley, P. 2015Can ratings have indirect effects? Evidence from the organizational response to peers’ environmental ratings.American Sociological Review, 80: 6391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shinkle, G. A. 2012Organizational aspirations, reference points, and goals.Journal of Management, 38: 415455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipilov, A. V., Greve, H. R., and Rowley, T. J. 2019Is all publicity good publicity? The impact of direct and indirect media pressure on the adoption of governance practices.Strategic Management Journal, 40: 13681393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siggelkow, N. and Levinthal, D. A. 2003Temporarily divide to conquer: Centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation.Organization Science, 14: 650669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. 1947 Administrative Behavior. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Singh, J. V. 1986Performance, slack, and risk taking in organizational decision making.Academy of Management Journal, 29: 562585.Google Scholar
Smith, E. B. and Chae, H. 2017The effect of organizational atypicality on reference group selection and performance evaluation.Organization Science, 28: 11341149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, W. K. and Besharov, M. L. 2019 “Bowing before dual gods: How structured flexibility sustains organizational hybridity.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 64: 1–44.Google Scholar
Sosa, M. L. 2011From old competence destruction to new competence access: Evidence from the comparison of two discontinuities in anticancer drug discovery.Organization Science, 22: 15001516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staw, B. M. 1976 “Knee-deep in the big muddy: A study of escalating commitment to a chosen course of action.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 16: 27–44.
Staw, B. M., Barsade, S. G., and Koput, K. W.. 1997Escalating at the credit window: A longitudinal study of bank executives’ recognition and write-off of problem loans.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 82: 132142.
Staw, B. M., Sandelands, L. E., and Dutton, J. E. 1981Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior: A multi-level analysis.Administrative Science Quarterly, 26: 501524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suddaby, R. and Greenwood, R. 2005Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy.Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 3567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terlaak, A. and King, A. A. 2006The effect of certification with the ISO 9000 quality management standard: A signaling approach.Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60: 579602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tetlock, P. E., Skitka, L., and Boettger, R. 1989Social and cognitive strategies for copying with accountability: Conformity, complexity, and bolstering.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 632640.
Thornton, P. H. 2001Personal versus market logics of control: A historically contingent theory of the risk of acquisition.Organization Science, 12: 294311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P. H. 2002The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics.” Academy of Management Journal, 45: 81101.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H. 2004 Markets from Culture: Institutional Logics and Organizational Decisions in Higher Education Publishing. Stanford, California: Stanford Business Books.Google Scholar
Thornton, P. H. and Ocasio, W. 1999Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry.American Journal of Sociology, 105: 801843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., and Lounsbury, M. 2012 The Institutional Logics Perspective: A New Approach to Culture, Structure and Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripsas, M. 2009Technology, identity, and inertia through the lens of ‘the digital photography company’.” Organization Science, 20: 441460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuggle, C. S., Schnatterly, K., and Johnson, R. A. 2010a “Attention patterns in the boardroom: How board composition and processes affect discussion of entrepreneurial issues.Academy of Management Journal, 53: 550571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuggle, C. S., Sirmon, D. G., Reutzel, C. R., and Bierman, L. 2010b “Commanding board of director attention: Investigating how organizational performance and CEO duality affect board members’ attention to monitoring.Strategic Management Journal, 31: 946968.Google Scholar
Tushman, M. L. and Anderson, P. 1986Technological discontinuities and organizational environments.Administrative Science Quarterly, 31: 439465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, T., Wezel, F. C., and Forgues, B. 2016Protecting market identity: When and how do organizations respond to consumers’ devaluations?Academy of Management Journal, 59: 135162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, M. 1978 Economy and Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Westphal, J. D. and Bednar, M. K. 2005Pluralistic ignorance in corporate boards and firms’ strategic persistence in response to low firm performance.Administrative Science Quarterly, 50: 262298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Westphal, J. D. and Zajac, E. J. 1995Who shall govern? CEO/board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection.Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 6083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiseman, R. M. and Bromiley, P. 1991Risk-return associations: Paradox or artifact? An empirically tested explanation.Strategic Management Journal, 12: 231241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wry, T., Cobb, J. A., and Aldrich, H. E. 2013More than a metaphor: Assessing the historical legacy of resource dependence and its contemporary promise as a theory of environmental complexity.Academy of Management Annals, 7: 441488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, C. M. and Greve, H. R. 2018Delayed adoption of rules: A relational theory of firm exposure and state cooptation.Journal of Management, 44: 33363363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Multiple Goals
Available formats

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Multiple Goals
Available formats

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Multiple Goals
Available formats