Element contents
The Psychology of Effective Activism
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 July 2021
Summary
This Element reviews the social psychology of effective collective action, highlighting the importance of considering activists' goals, timeframes, and psychological perspectives in seeking to conceptualise this construct. A novel framework 'ABIASCA' maps effectiveness in relation to activists' goals for mobilisation and change (Awareness raising; Building sympathy; turning sympathy into Intentions; turning intentions into Actions; Sustaining groups over time; Coalition-building; and Avoiding opponents' counter-mobilisation). We also review the DIME model of Disidentification, Innovation, Moralization and Energization, which examines the effects of failure in creating trajectories of activists' disidentification from collective action; innovation (including to radicalisation or deradicalisation); and increased moral conviction and energy. The social psychological drivers of effective collective action for four audiences are examined in detail, in four sections: for the self and supporters, bystanders, opponents, and for third parties. We conclude by highlighting an agenda for future research, and drawing out key messages for scholars.
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108975476Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 12 August 2021
References
Aalberg, T., Esser, F., Reinemann, C., Stromback, J., & De Vreese, C. (2016). Populist Political Communication in Europe. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agnone, J. (2007). Amplifying public opinion: The policy impact of the US environmental movement. Social Forces, 85(4), 1593–620. www.jstor.org/stable/4495000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agronick, G. S., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Personality and social change: Individual differences, life path, and importance attributed to the women’s movement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(6), 1545–1555. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1545CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberici, A. I., & Milesi, P. (2016). Online discussion, politicized identity, and collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215581430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M., & Hitlin, P. (2016). Social media conversations about race: How social media users see, share and discuss race and the rise of hashtags like #BlackLivesMatter. Retrieved from: www.pewresearch.org/internet/2016/08/15/social-media-conversations-about-race.Google Scholar
Andits, P. (2016). From historical injustice to local conflict: Mobilization–countermobilization dynamics surrounding the 2005 Melbourne ‘Trianon Protest’. Social Movement Studies, 15(3), 322–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2015.1070727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, K., & Caren, N. (2010). Making the news: Movement organizations, media attention, and the public agenda. American Sociological Review, 75(6), 841–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122410386689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anisin, A. (2016). Violence begets violence: Why states should not lethally repress popular protest. The International Journal of Human Rights, 20(7), 893–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2016.1192536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Art, D. (2011). Inside the Radical Right: The Development of Anti-Immigrant Parties in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Awad, S. H. (2016). The identity process in times of rupture: Narratives from the Egyptian revolution. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 4(1), 128–41. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v4i1.521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayanian, A. H., & Tausch, N. (2016). How risk perception shapes collective action intentions in repressive contexts: A study of Egyptian activists during the 2013 post-coup uprising. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55(4), 700–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12164CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baggetta, M., Han, H., & Andrews, K. T. (2013). Leading associations: How individual characteristics and team dynamics generate committed leaders. American Sociological Review, 78(4), 544–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122413489877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bain, P. G., Hornsey, M. J., Bongiorno, R., Kashima, Y., & Crimston, D. (2013). Collective futures: How projections about the future of society are related to actions and attitudes supporting social change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(4), 523–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Seebauer, S. (2015). Collective climate action: Determinants of participation intention in community-based pro-environmental initiatives. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 155–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.06.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (2000). Exercise of human agency through collective efficacy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(3), 75–8. www.jstor.org/stable/20182630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bar‐Tal, D. (2000). From intractable conflict through conflict resolution to reconciliation: Psychological analysis. Political Psychology, 21(2), 351–65. www.jstor.org/stable/3791795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beamish, T. D., & Luebbers, A. J. (2009). Alliance building across social movements: Bridging difference in a peace and justice coalition. Social Problems, 56(4), 647–76. https://doi.org/10.1525/sp.2009.56.4.647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beer, M. (2021). Revisiting the Methods of Nonviolent Action. Washington, DC: International Center on Nonviolent Conflict.Google Scholar
Ben David, Y., & Rubel-Lifschitz, T. (2018). Practice the change you want to see in the world: Transformative practices of social movements in Israel. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24(1), 10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benford, R. D., & Snow, D. A. (2000). Framing processes and social movements: An overview and assessment. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 611–39. www.jstor.org/stable/223459CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58(4), 707–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndsen, M., Thomas, E. F., & Pedersen, A. (2018). Resisting perspective-taking: Glorification of the national group elicits non-compliance with perspective-taking instructions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 79, 126–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.07.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bimber, B., Flanagin, A., & Stohl, C. (2012). Collective Action in Organizations: Interaction and Engagement in an Era of Technological Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwood, L., & Louis, W. R. (2017). Choosing between conciliatory and oppositional leaders: The role of out‐group signals and in‐group leader candidates’ collective action tactics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 320–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwood, L. M., & Louis, W. R. (2012). If it matters for the group then it matters to me: Collective action outcomes for seasoned activists. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 72–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02001.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliuc, A.M., McGarty, C., Hartley, L., & Muntele, H.D. (2012). Manipulating national identity: The strategic use of rhetoric by supporters and opponents of the ‘Cronulla riots’ in Australia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 35(12), 2174–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2011.600768CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliuc, A.M., McGarty, C., Thomas, E. F., Lala, G., Berndsen, M., & Misajon, R. (2015). Public division about climate change rooted in conflicting socio-political identities. Nature Climate Change, 5(3), 226–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliuc, A. M., McGarty, C., & Reynolds, K. (2003). Predicting political behaviour in opinion-based groups: The role of social identification and social identity salience. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55, 34.Google Scholar
Bliuc, A. M., McGarty, C., Reynolds, K., & Muntele, D. (2007). Opinion‐based group membership as a predictor of commitment to political action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boin, A., ’t Hart, P., & McConnell, A. (2009). Crisis exploitation: Political and policy impacts of framing contests. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 81–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802453221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bongiorno, R., McGarty, C., Kurz, T., Haslam, S. A., & Sibley, C. G. (2016). Mobilizing cause supporters through group-based interaction. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(4), 203–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boscarino, J. E. (2016). Setting the record straight: Frame contestation as an advocacy tactic. Policy Studies Journal, 44(3), 280–308. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (2011). A Cooperative Species: Human Reciprocity and Its Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bradley, B. (2011). The rise and decline of Australian unionism: A history of Industrial labour from the 1820s to 2010. Labour History, 100, 51–82. https://doi.org/10.5263/labourhistory.100.0051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, P. (1998). Bringing the public back in: Should sociologists consider the impact of public opinion on public policy? Social Forces, 77(1), 27–62. https://doi.org/10.2307/3006009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burstein, P. (2003). The impact of public opinion on public policy: A review and an agenda. Political Research Quarterly, 56(1), 29–40. www.jstor.org/stable/3219881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caiani, M., & Della Porta, D. (2018). The radical right as social movement organizations. In Rydgren, J. (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Radical Right. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 52–80. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190274559.001.0001Google Scholar
Canetti-Nisim, D., Halperin, E., Sharvit, K., & Hobfoll, S. E. (2009). A new stress-based model of political extremism: Personal exposure to terrorism, psychological distress, and exclusionist political attitudes. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 53(3), 363–89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002709333296CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canetti, D., Hall, B. J., Rapaport, C., & Wayne, C. (2013). Exposure to political violence and political extremism. European Psychologist, 18(4), 263–72. https://doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carey, S. C. (2006). The dynamic relationship between protest and repression. Political Research Quarterly, 59(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carman, J. G., & Nesbit, R. (2013). Founding new nonprofit organizations: Syndrome or symptom? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 42(3), 603–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764012459255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, C. W., & Gorski, P. C. (2015). Burnout in social justice and human rights activists: Symptoms, causes and implications. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 7(3), 366–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huv011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenoweth, E. (2020). The future of nonviolent resistance. Journal of Democracy, 31(3), 69–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenoweth, E., & Lewis, O. A. (2013). Unpacking nonviolent campaigns: Introducing the NAVCO 2.0 dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 50(3), 415–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343312471551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chenoweth, E., & Stephan, M. J. (2011). Why Civil Resistance Works: The Strategic Logic of Non-Violent Conflict. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, L. J. (2012). Pragmatic resistance, law, and social movements in authoritarian states: The case of gay collective action in Singapore. Law and Society Review, 46(4), 713–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2012.00515.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cordner, A., Brown, P., & Mulcahy, M. (2015). Playing with fire: Flame retardant activists and policy arenas. In Duyvendak, J. W. & Jasper, J. (eds). Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 211–28.Google Scholar
Crelinsten, R. D. (2002). Analysing terrorism and counter-terrorism: A communication model. Terrorism and political violence, 14(2), 77–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/714005618CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cress, D. M., & Snow, D. A. (2000). The outcomes of homeless mobilization: The influence of organization, disruption, political mediation, and framing. American Journal of Sociology, 105(4), 1063–104. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3003888CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, N., Kende, A., & Kende, J. (2016). Navigating multiple identities: The simultaneous influence of advantaged and disadvantaged identities on politicization and activism. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 264–85. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, N., & McGarty, C. (2016). Expanding on psychological theories of engagement to understand activism in context(s). Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 227–41. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danaher, K., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). Maintaining the system with tokenism: Bolstering individual mobility beliefs and identification with a discriminatory organization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 343–62. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X457530CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davenport, C. (2000). Paths to State Repression: Human Rights Violations and Contentious Politics. New York: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Davenport, C. (2007). State repression and political order. Annual Review of Political Science, 10, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.101405.143216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dearing, J. W., & Rogers, E. M. (1996). Communication Concept 6: Agenda-Setting. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Della Porta, D., & Rucht, D. (1995). Left-libertarian movements in context: A comparison of Italy and West Germany, 1965–1990. Discussion Paper FS III 91–102. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum.Google Scholar
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 417–40. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixon, J., & Levine, M. (2012). Beyond Prejudice: Extending the Social Psychology of Conflict, Inequality and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., & Jung, J. (2015). Professions, social movements, and the sovereign corporation. In Jasper, J. M. & Duyvendak, J. W. (eds.), Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Dodge, J. (2016). Crowded advocacy: Framing dynamic in the fracking controversy in New York. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 28(3), 888–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-016-9800-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dorjee, T. (2015). The Tibetan Nonviolent Struggle: A Strategic and Historical Analysis. Washington, DC: International Center on Nonviolent Conflict.Google Scholar
Doucerain, M., Amiot, C. E., Thomas, E., & Louis, W. R. (2018). What it means to be American: Identity inclusiveness/exclusiveness and support for policies about Muslims among U.S.-born Whites. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 18(1), 224–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/asap.12167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DowntonJr, J., & Wehr, P. (1998). Persistent pacifism: How activist commitment is developed and sustained. Journal of Peace Research, 35(5), 531–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343398035005001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Droogendyk, L., Wright, S. C., Lubensky, M., & Louis, W. R. (2016). Acting in solidarity: Cross-group contact between disadvantaged group members and advantaged group allies. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 315–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12168CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, J., Cocking, C., Beale, J., Hanson, C., & Rapley, F. (2005). The phenomenology of empowerment in collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 309–28. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466604x18523CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2000). Collective action and psychological change: The emergence of new social identities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(4), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164642CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2005). Explaining enduring empowerment: A comparative study of collective action and psychological outcomes. European Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, J., & Reicher, S. (2009). Collective psychological empowerment as a model of social change: Researching crowds and power. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 707–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01622.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drury, J., Stott, C., & Farsides, T. (2003). The role of police perceptions and practices in the development of ‘public disorder’. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(7), 1480–1500. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01959.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, L. E. (1999). Motivation for collective action: Group consciousness as mediator of personality, life experiences, and women’s rights activism. Political Psychology, 20(3), 611–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, L. E. (2012). The Psychology of collective action. In Deaux, K. & Snyder, M. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Personality and Social Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dupuis, D. R., Wohl, M. J., Packer, D. J., & Tabri, N. (2016). To dissent and protect: Stronger collective identification increases willingness to dissent when group norms evoke collective angst. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 19(5), 694–710. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216638535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duyvendak, J. W., & Jasper, J. M. (2015). Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Edwards, B., & McCarthy, J. D. (2004). Resources and social movement mobilization. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., & Kriesi, H. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 116–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103.ch6Google Scholar
Edwards, B. , McCarthy, J. D., & Mataic, D. R. (2018). The resource context of social movements. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., Kriesi, H., & McCammon, H. J. (eds.), The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 79–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellefsen, R. (2016). Judicial opportunities and the death of SHAC: Legal repression along a cycle of contention. Social Movement Studies, 15(5), 441–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2016.1185360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellefsen, R. (2018). Deepening the explanation of radical flank effects: Tracing contingent outcomes of destructive capacity. Qualitative Sociology 41(1), 111–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-018-9373-3CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43, 51–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, M., Willer, R., & Kovacheff, C. (2020). The activist’s dilemma: Extreme protest actions reduce popular support for social movements. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 119(5), 1086–111. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, N., McDaid, S., & McAuley, J. W. (2018). Social movements, structural violence, and conflict transformation in Northern Ireland: The role of loyalist paramilitaries. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferree, M.M., & Mueller, C. (2004). Feminism and the women’s movements: A global perspective. In Snow, D. A., Soule, S. A., & Kriesi, H. (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. New Jersey: Blackwell Publishing, 116–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999103Google Scholar
Fetner, T. (2008). Taking to the streets: Protest and direct democracy. In Fetner, T. (ed.), How the Religious Right Shaped Lesbian and Gay Activism. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttvb8dGoogle Scholar
Fielding, K. S., & Hornsey, M. J. (2016). A social identity analysis of climate change and environmental attitudes and behaviors: Insights and opportunities. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 121. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fielding, K.S., Hornsey, M.J., Thai, H.A., & Toh, L.L. (2019). Using ingroup messengers and ingroup values to promote climate change policy. Climatic Change, 158, 181–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02561-zGoogle Scholar
Fielding, K. S., McDonald, R., & Louis, W. R. (2008). Theory of planned behaviour, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(4), 318–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flack, P., & Ferguson, N. (in press). Conflict transformation: Relinquishing or maintaining social identity among former loyalist combatants in Northern Ireland. Political Psychology. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/pops.12694Google Scholar
Freudenberger, H. J. (1974). Staff burn‐out. Journal of Social Issues, 30(1), 159–65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.1974.tb00706.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fritsche, I., Barth, M., Jugert, P., Masson, T., & Reese, G. (2018). A social identity model of pro-environmental action (SIMPEA). Psychological Review, 125(2), 245–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallego, A., & Oberski, D. (2012). Personality and political participation: The mediation hypothesis. Political Behavior, 34(3), 425–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9168-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, W. A., Fireman, B., & Rytina, S. (1982). Encounters with Unjust Authority. Belmont, CA: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Gattinara, P., & Pirro, A. L. (2019). The far right as social movement. European Societies, 21(4), 447–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2018.1494301Google Scholar
Gerber, A. S., Huber, G. A., Doherty, D., & Dowling, C. M. (2011). The Big Five Personality traits in the political arena. Annual Review of Political Science, 14(1), 265–87. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051010-111659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giddings, P. J. (2009). Ida A. Sword among Lions: Ida B. Wells and the Campaign Against Lynching. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Giugni, M. (1998). Was it worth the effort? The outcomes and consequences of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 371–93. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Global Witness (2018). At What Cost? Irresponsible Business and the Murder of Land and Environmental Defenders in 2017. London: Global Witness.Google Scholar
Glynn, C. J., & Huge, M. E. (2008). Public opinion. In The International Encyclopedia of Communication. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Golder, M. (2016). Far right parties in Europe. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 477–97. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-042814-012441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta‐analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomes, M. E. (1992). The rewards and stresses of social change: A qualitative study of peace activists. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 32(4), 138–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022167892324008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, J., & Pfaff, S. (2001). Emotion work in high-risk social movements: Managing fear in the US and East German civil rights movements. In Goodwin, J., Jasper, J. M., & Polletta, F. (eds.), Passionate Politics: Emotions and Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 282–302. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226304007.003.0017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordijn, E. H., de Vries, N. K., & de Dreu, C. K. W. (2002). Minority influence on focal and related attitudes: Change in size, attributions, and information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(10), 1315–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616702236819CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouws, A., & Coetzee, A. (2019). Women’s movements and feminist activism. Agenda, 33(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10130950.2019.1619263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenaway, K. H., Quinn, E. A., & Louis, W. R. (2011). Appealing to common humanity increases forgiveness but reduces collective action among victims of historical atrocities. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41(5), 569–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.802CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliver, R., Chapman, C. M., Solly, K. N., & Schultz, T. (2020). Testing the impact of images in environmental campaigns. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 71, 101468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliver, R., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2019). Understanding the outcomes of climate change campaigns in the Australian environmental movement. Case Studies in the Environment, 3(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1525/cse.2018.001651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliver, R., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. (2020). The characteristics, activities and goals of environmental organizations engaged in advocacy within the Australian environmental movement. Environmental Communication, 14(5), 614–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2019.1697326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gusfield, J. R. (1986). Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement. Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Ha, S. E., Kim, S., & Jo, S. H. (2013). Personality traits and political participation: Evidence from South Korea. Political Psychology, 34(4), 511–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2010). The New Psychology of Leadership: Identity, Influence and Power. Milton Park:Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, L. E., Tropp, L. R., Hornsey, M. J., & Barlow, F. K. (2018). How negative contact and positive contact with Whites predict collective action among racial and ethnic minorities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12220CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heinisch, R., & Mazzoleni, O. (2016). Understanding Populist Party Organisation: The Radical Right in Western Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Heumann, S., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2015). When and why religious groups become political players. In Jasper., J. M. & Duyvendak, J. W. (eds.), Players and Arenas: The Interactive Dynamics of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Hobolt, S., Leeper, T., & Tilley, J. (2020). Divided by the vote: Affective polarization in the wake of the Brexit referendum. British Journal of Political Science, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123420000125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopgood, S. (2006). Keepers of the Flame: Understanding Amnesty International. New York: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, N., Reicher, S. D., Khan, S. S., Tewari, S., Srinivasan, N., & Stevenson, C. (2016). Explaining effervescence: Investigating the relationship between shared social identity and positive experience in crowds. Cognition and Emotion, 30(1), 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2015.1015969CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horgan, J. (2008). From profiles to pathways and roots to routes: Perspectives from psychology on radicalization into terrorism. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 618(1), 80–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716208317539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horgan, J., Altier, M. B., Shortland, N., & Taylor, M. (2017). Walking away: The disengagement and de-radicalization of a violent right-wing extremist. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression, 9(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2016.1156722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornsey, M. J., Blackwood, L., Louis, W., Fielding, K., Mavor, K., Morton, T., & White, K. M. (2006). Why do people engage in collective action? Revisiting the role of perceived effectiveness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36(7), 1701–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9029.2006.00077.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornsey, M. J., Trembath, M., & Gunthorpe, S. (2004). ‘You can criticize because you care’: Identity attachment, constructiveness, and the intergroup sensitivity effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 34(5), 499–518. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornung, J., Bandelow, N. C., & Vogeler, C. S. (2019). Social identities in the policy process. Policy Sciences, 52(2), 211–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9340-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskin, R. E., Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. (2019). Transnational contact and challenging global poverty: Intergroup contact intensifies (the right kind of) social identities to promote solidarity‐based collective action for those low in social dominance. Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology, 3(1), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts5.24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iyer, A., & Ryan, M. K. (2009). Why do men and women challenge gender discrimination in the workplace? The role of group status and in-group identification in predicting pathways to collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 791–814. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01625.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jäckle, S., & König, P. D. (2017). The dark side of the German ‘welcome culture’: Investigating the causes behind attacks on refugees in 2015. West European Politics, 40(2), 223–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2016.1215614CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, S. K., McDuff, M. D., & Monroe, M. C. (2015). Conservation Education and Outreach Techniques. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacquet, J. (2017). Guilt and shame in US climate change communication. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Climate Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jasper, J. (2004). A strategic approach to collective action: Looking for agency in social-movement choices. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 9(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.17813/maiq.9.1.m112677546p63361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, J. M. (1997). The Art of Moral Protest: Culture, Biography, and Creativity in Social Movements. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasper, J. M. (2019). Linking arenas: structuring concepts in the study of politics and protest. Social Movement Studies, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2019.1679106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1990). Democratic Politics and Policy Analysis. Monterey County, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing.Google Scholar
Jiménez‐Moya, G., Spears, R., Rodríguez‐Bailón, R., & de Lemus, S. (2015). By any means necessary? When and why low group identification paradoxically predicts radical collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 517–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E.W., Agnone, J., & McCarthy, J.D. (2010). Movement organizations, synergistic tactics and environmental public policy. Social Forces, 88(5), 2267–92. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.2010.0038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. G., & Libicki, M. C. (2008). How Terrorist Groups End: Lessons from Countering Al-Qa’ida. London: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D., & Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karácsony, G., & Róna, D. (2011). The secret of Jobbik: Reasons behind the rise of the Hungarian radical right. Journal of East European & Asian Studies, 2(1), 61–92.Google Scholar
Kidd, L. R., Garrard, G. E., Bekessy, S. A., Mills, M., Camilleri, A. R., Fidler, F., & Louis, W. (2019). Messaging matters: A systematic review of the conservation messaging literature. Biological conservation, 236, 92–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.05.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, W. (2016). Economic globalization, inequality, and protest movements under capitalist political regimes, 1970–2007. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 57(5), 267–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020715216673414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, B. (1984). Mobilization and participation: Social-psychological expansions of resource mobilization theory. American Sociological Review, 49(5), 583–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095417CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, B. (1997). The Social Psychology of Protest. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Klandermans, B., De, Weerd, M., Sabucedo, J. M., & Costa, M. (1999). Injustice and adversarial frames in a supranational political context: Farmers’ protest in the Netherlands and Spain. In Della Porta, D. & Kriesi, H. (eds.), Social Movements in a Globalizing World. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 134–47.Google Scholar
Klandermans, B., van der Toorn, J., & van Stekelenburg, J. (2008). Embeddedness and identity: How immigrants turn grievances into action. American Sociological Review, 73(6), 992–1012. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240807300606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klandermans, B., & Oegema, D. (1987). Potentials, networks, motivations and barriers: Steps towards participation in social movements. American Sociological Review, 52(4), 519–31. doi:https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/2095297.pdfCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klimecki, O., & Singer, T. (2012). Empathic distress fatigue rather than compassion fatigue? Integrating findings from empathy research in psychology and social neuroscience. In Oakley, B., Knafo, A., Madhavan, G., & Wilson, D. S. (eds.), Pathological Altruism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 368–83.Google Scholar
Kohn, S. (2014). Tibetan nonviolence. Peace Review, 26(1), 62–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/10402659.2014.876318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Bélanger, J. J., & Gunaratna, R. (2019). The Three Pillars of Radicalization: Needs, Narratives, and Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, C. W., & Allen, A. M. (2017). The social psychology of the Black Lives Matter meme and movement. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(6), 543–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417719319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leach, C. W., Iyer, A., & Pedersen, A. (2006). Anger and guilt about ingroup advantage explain the willingness for political action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(9), 1232–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206289729CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lejano, R. P., & Dodge, J. (2017). The narrative properties of ideology: The adversarial turn and climate skepticism in the USA. Policy Sciences, 50(2), 195–215. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9274-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, L., & Hutchins, B. (2009). Power games: Environmental protest, news media and the internet. Media, Culture and Society, 31(4), 579–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709335201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lester, L., & Hutchins, B. (2012). The power of the unseen: Environmental conflict, the media and invisibility. Media, Culture and Society, 34(7), 847–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443712452772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, A. G. (2014). Why the psychology of collective action requires qualitative transformation as well as quantitative change. Contemporary Social Science, 9(1), 121–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/21582041.2013.851404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Livingstone, A., Spears, R., Manstead, A.S.R., & Bruder, M. (2009). Defining common goals without speaking the same language: Social identity and social action in Wales. In Wetherell, M. (ed.), Theorizing Identities and Social Action: Identity Studies in the Social Sciences. London: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246942_13Google Scholar
Lizzio-Wilson, M., Masser, B. M., Hornsey, M. J., & Iyer, A. (2020). You’re making us all look bad: Sexism moderates women’s experience of collective threat and intra-gender hostility toward traditional and non-traditional female subtypes. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 1368430220913610. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220913610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizzio-Wilson, M., Thomas, E. F., Louis, W. R., Wilcockson, B., Amiot, C. E., Moghaddam, F. M., & McGarty, C. (2021). How collective action failure shapes group heterogeneity and engagement in conventional and radical action over time. Psychological Science, 32(4), 519–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez, I. F. H. (2001). Protest, repression, and race: Legal violence and the Chicano movement. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 150(1),205–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R. (2009). Collective action – and then what? Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 727–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01623.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R. , Amiot, C. E. , Thomas, E. F. , & Blackwood, L. (2016). The ‘activist identity’ and activism across domains: A multiple identities analysis. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 242–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R., Chonu, G. K., Achia, T., Chapman, C. M., & Rhee, J. (2018). Building group norms and identities in societal transitions from democracy to dictatorship and back again. In Wagoner, B., Bresco de Luna, I., & Glaveanu, V. (eds.), The Road To Actualized Democracy: A Psychological Exploration. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Press, 27–57.Google Scholar
Louis, W. R., Duck, J. M., Terry, D. J., & Lalonde, R. N. (2010). Speaking out on immigration policy in Australia: Identity threat and the interplay of own opinion and public opinion. Journal of Social Issues, 66(4), 653–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01669.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R., Mavor, K. I., & Terry, D. J. (2003). Reflections on the statistical analysis of personality and norms in war, peace, and prejudice: Are deviant minorities the problem? Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 3(1), 189–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1530-2415.2003.00025.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R., & Montiel, C. J. (2018). Social movements and social transformation: Steps towards understanding the challenges and breakthroughs of social change. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24(1), 3–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pac0000309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R., Taylor, D. M., & Neil, T. (2004). Cost-benefit analyses for your group and yourself: The rationality of decision-making in conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 15(2), 110–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R., Taylor, D., & Douglas, R. (2005a). Normative influence and rational conflict decisions: Group norms and cost-benefit analyses for intergroup behavior. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 8(4), 355–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430205056465CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R., Thomas, E., Chapman, C. M., Achia, T., Wibisono, S., Mirnajafi, Z., & Droogendyk, L. (2019). Emerging research on intergroup prosociality: Group members’ charitable giving, positive contact, allyship, and solidarity with others. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 13(3). https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis, W. R., Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Lizzio-Wilson, M., Amiot, C., & Moghaddam, F. (2020). The volatility of collective action: Theoretical analysis and empirical data. Advances in Political Psychology, 41(S1), 35–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maass, A., Clark, R. D., & Haberkorn, G. (1982). The effects of differential ascribed category membership and norms on minority influence. European Journal of Social Psychology, 12(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420120107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macy, J. (2007). World as Self, World as Lover: Courage and Global Justice and Ecological Renewal. Berkeley, CA: Parallax Press.Google Scholar
Mallett, R. K., Huntsinger, J. R., Sinclair, S., & Swim, J. K. (2008). Seeing through their eyes: When majority group members take collective action on behalf of an outgroup. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 11(4), 451–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430208095400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Margetts, H. Z., John, P., Hale, S. A., & Reissfelder, S. (2015). Leadership without leaders? Starters and followers in online collective action. Political Studies, 63(2), 278–99. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9248.12075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, S. V. (2016). Reintegrating Extremists: Deradicalisation and Desistance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mazumder, S. (2018). The persistent effect of US civil rights protests on political attitudes. American Journal of Political Science, 62(4), 922–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzoleni, G. (2003). The Media and the Growth of Neo-Populism in Contemporary Democracies. London: Praeger.Google Scholar
McAdam, D. (1982). Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
McBeth, M. K., Shanahan, E. A., & Jones, M. D. (2005). The science of storytelling: Measuring policy beliefs in Greater Yellowstone. Society and Natural Resources, 18(5), 413–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920590924765CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212–41. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2777934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(1), 81–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, R. I., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2013). Energizing and de-motivating effects of norm-conflict. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(1), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167212464234CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDonald, R. I., Fielding, K. S., & Louis, W. R. (2014). Conflicting norms highlight the need for action. Environment and Behavior, 46(2), 139–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512453992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarty, C., Bliuc, A. M., Thomas, E. F., & Bongiorno, R. (2009). Collective action as the material expression of opinion-based group membership. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 839–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01627.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGarty, C., Thomas, E., Blink, C., Musgrove, L., & Bliuc, A. (2006). Linking social identity, opinion, emotion, and interaction to produce long-term opinion change. Australian Journal of Psychology, 58, 39.Google Scholar
McKimmie, B. M., Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., Manstead, A. S., Spears, R., & Doosje, B. (2003). I’m a hypocrite, but so is everyone else: Group support and the reduction of cognitive dissonance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(3), 214–224. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.7.3.214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNair, B. (2017). An Introduction to Political Communication (6th ed.). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metze, T., & Dodge, J. (2016). Dynamic discourse coalitions on hydro-fracking in Europe and the United States. Environmental Communication, 10(3), 365–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2015.1133437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D. S. (2004). Protest and political opportunities. Annual Review of Sociology, 30, 125–45. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, D. S., & Staggenborg, S. (1996). Movements, countermovements, and the structure of political opportunity. American Journal of Sociology, 101(6), 1628–60. https://doi.org/10.1086/230869CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2013). The Psychology of Dictatorship. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2016). The Psychology of Democracy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moghaddam, F. M. (2018). Mutual radicalization: How Groups and Nations Drive Each Other to Extremes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monaghan, J., & Walby, K. (2012). ‘They attacked the city’: Security intelligence, the sociology of protest policing and the anarchist threat at the 2010 Toronto G20 summit. Current Sociology, 60(5), 653–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392112448470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooijman, M., Hoover, J., Lin, Y., Ji, H., & Dehghani, M. (2018). Moralization in social networks and the emergence of violence during protests. Nature Human Behaviour, 2(6), 389–96. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0353-0CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moscovici, S., Lage, E., & Naffrechoux, M. (1969). Influence of a consistent minority on the responses of a majority in a color perception task. Sociometry, 32(4), 365–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2009). Measuring political mobilization: The distinction between activism and radicalism. Terrorism and Political Violence, 21(2), 239–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546550902765508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moskalenko, S., & McCauley, C. (2011). The psychology of lone-wolf terrorism. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 24(2), 115–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2011.581835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mudde, C. (2007). Radical right parties in Europe: What, who, why? Participation, 34(3), 12–15.Google Scholar
Muis, J., & Immerzeel, T. (2017). Causes and consequences of the rise of populist radical right parties and movements in Europe. Current Sociology, 65(6), 909–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011392117717294CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mundt, M., Ross, K., & Burnett, C. M. (2018). Scaling social movements through social media: The case of Black Lives Matter. Social Media and Society, 4(4), 2056305118807911. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118807911Google Scholar
Nagle, A. (2017). Kill all Normies: The Online Culture Wars from Tumblr and 4chan to the Alt-Right and Trump. Winchester: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Nisbet, M. C. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12–23.Google Scholar
Newman, T. P., Nisbet, E. C., & Nisbet, M. C. (2018). Climate change, cultural cognition, and media effects: Worldviews drive news selectivity, biased processing, and polarized attitudes. Public Understanding of Science, 27(8), 985–1002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Norton, T. , & Grecu, N. (2015). Publics, communication campaigns, and persuasive communication. In Hansen, A. & Cox, R. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Environment and Communication. London: Routledge, 374–87.Google Scholar
Ntontis, E., & Hopkins, N. (2018). Framing a ‘social problem’: Emotion in anti‐abortion activists’ depiction of the abortion debate. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(3), 666–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12249CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oegema, D., & Klandermans, B. (1994). Why social movement sympathizers don’t participate: Erosion and nonconversion of support. American Sociological Review, 59(5), 703–22. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orazani, S. N., & Leidner, B. (2019). A case for social change in Iran: Greater support and mobilization potential for nonviolent than violent social movements. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 25(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, D., Jost, J. T., Becker, J. C., Badaan, V., & Sibley, C. G. (2018). Protesting to challenge or defend the system? A system justification perspective on collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 244–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2522Google Scholar
Packer, D. J. (2009). Avoiding groupthink: Whereas weakly identified members remain silent, strongly identified members dissent about collective problems. Psychological Science, 20(5), 546–48.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parker, K., Horowitz, J. M., & Anderson, M. (2020). Amid protests, majorities across racial and ethnic groups express support for the Black Lives Matter Movement. Retrieved from: www.pewsocialtrends.org/2020/06/12/amid-protests-majorities-across-racial-and-ethnic-groups-express-support-for-the-black-lives-matter-movement.Google Scholar
Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Green, J. L. (2006). The international women’s movement and women’s political representation, 1893–2003. American Sociological Review, 71(6), 898–920. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100602CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Platow, M. J., Eggins, R. A., Chattopadhyay, R., Brewer, G., Hardwick, L., Milsom, L., Brocklebank, J., Lalor, T., Martin, R., Quee, M. & Vassallo, S. (2013). Two experimental tests of relational models of procedural justice: Non‐instrumental voice and authority group membership. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(2), 361–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pratt, D. (2015). Islamophobia as reactive co-radicalization. Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations, 26(2), 205–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09596410.2014.1000025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ray, R. (2020). Setting the record straight on the Movement for Black Lives. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 43(8), 1393–1401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2020.1718727CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, J. H., & Bamberg, S. (2014). Climate protection needs societal change: Determinants of intention to participate in collective climate action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 466–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicher, S., Cassidy, C., Wolpert, I., Hopkins, N., & Levine, M. (2006). Saving Bulgaria’s Jews: An analysis of social identity and the mobilisation of social solidarity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 36(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicher, S., Hopkins, N., Levine, M., & Rath, R. (2005). Entrepreneurs of hate and entrepreneurs of solidarity: Social identity as a basis for mass communication. International Review of the Red Cross, 87(860), 621–37. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1816383100184462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, N. K., Becker, J. C., Benz, A., Christ, O., Dhont, K., Klocke, U., Hewstone, M. (2017). Intergroup contact and social change: Implications of negative and positive contact for collective action in advantaged and disadvantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 121–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216676478CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richter, L., Cordner, A., & Brown, P. (2018). Non-stick science: Sixty years of research and (in)action on fluorinated compounds. Social Studies of Science, 48(5), 691–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718799960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, T. (1984). Constructing cultist ‘mind control’. Sociological Analysis, 45(3), 241–56. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3711480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rooduijn, M. (2015). The rise of the populist radical right in Western Europe. European View, 14(1), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12290-015-0347-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runciman, W. (1966). Relative Deprivation and Social Justice: A Study of Attitudes to Social Inequality in Twentieth-Century England. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Saab, R., Tausch, N., Spears, R., & Cheung, W. Y. (2015). Acting in solidarity: Testing an extended dual pathway model of collective action by bystander group members. British Journal of Social Psychology, 54(3), 539–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12095CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sabatier, P. A. (1998). The advocacy coalition framework: Revisions and relevance for Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 98–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000051CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabatier, P. A., & Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993). The advocacy coalition framework: Assessment, revisions, and implications for scholars and practitioners. In Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 211–36.Google Scholar
Sani, F., & Reicher, S. (1998). When consensus fails: An analysis of the schism within the Italian Communist Party (1991). European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 623–45.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sani, F., & Reicher, S. (2000). Contested identities and schisms in groups: Opposing the ordination of women as priests in the Church of England. British Journal of Social Psychology, 39(1), 95–112. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466600164354CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulte, M., Bamberg, S., Rees, J., & Rollin, P. (2020). Social identity as a key concept for connecting transformative societal change with individual environmental activism. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 72, 101525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharp, G. (1973). The Politics of Nonviolent Action (vol. 1). Boston: Sargent Publisher.Google Scholar
Siegel, D. A. (2011). When does repression work? Collective action in social networks. The Journal of Politics, 73(4), 993–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simcox, R., Stuart, H., & Ahmed, H. (2010). Islamist Terrorism: The British Connections. London: The Henry Jackson Society.Google Scholar
Simon, B., & Grabow, O. (2010). The Politicization of migrants: Further evidence that politicized collective identity is a dual identity. Political Psychology, 31(5), 717–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2010.00782.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, B., & Klandermans, B. (2001). Politicized collective identity: A social psychological analysis. American Psychologist, 56(4), 319–31. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.56.4.319CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simpson, B., Willer, R., & Feinberg, M. (2018). Does violent protest backfire? Testing a theory of public reactions to activist violence. Socius: Sociological Research for a Dynamic World, 4, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118803189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P. (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102, 143–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J., Louis, W. R., Terry, D. J., Greenaway, K. H., Clarke, M. R., & Cheng, X. (2012). Congruent or conflicted? The impact of injunctive and descriptive norms on environmental intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 32(4), 353–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.06.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. R., & Louis, W. R. (2008). Do as we say and as we do: The interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude–behavior relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology, 47, 647–66. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466607X269748CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, J. R., & Louis, W. R. (2009). Group norms and the attitude–behaviour relationship. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00161.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. G., Blackwood, L., & Thomas, E. F. (2020). The need to refocus on the group as the site of radicalization. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(2), 327–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619885870CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, L. G., Livingstone, A. G., & Thomas, E. F. (2019). Advancing the social psychology of rapid societal change. British Journal of Social Psychology, 58(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, L. G., Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. (2015). ‘We must be the change we want to see in the world’: Integrating norms and identities through social interaction. Political Psychology, 36(5), 543–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snow, D. A., & Benford, R. D. (1988). Ideology, frame resonance, and participant mobilization. In Klandersman, B., Kriesi, H., & Tarrow, S. G. (eds.), From Structure to Action: Comparing Social Movement Research across Cultures. Greenwich: JAI Press.Google Scholar
Soares, M., Barbosa, M., & Matos, R. (2018). Police officers’ perspectives on state (police) violence: A sociomoral and psychological-driven study on disengagement. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6(1), 174–204. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v6i1.597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sotirov, M., & Winkel, G. (2016). Toward a cognitive theory of shifting coalitions and policy change: Linking the advocacy coalition framework and cultural theory. Policy Sciences, 49(2), 125–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9235-8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, R. (2010). Group rationale, collective sense: Beyond intergroup bias. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X481308CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Staggenborg, S. (1998). Social movement communities and cycles of protest: The emergence and maintenance of a local women’s movement. Social Problems, 45(2), 180–204. https://doi.org/10.2307/3097243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steffens, N. K., Haslam, S. A., Ryan, M. K., & Kessler, T. (2013). Leader performance and prototypicality: Their inter‐relationship and impact on leaders’ identity entrepreneurship. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(7), 606–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1985CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stephan, M. J., & Chenoweth, E. (2008). Why civil resistance works: The strategic logic of nonviolent conflict. International security, 33(1), 7–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stock, P. V. (2014). The perennial nature of the Catholic Worker farms: A reconsideration of failure. Rural Sociology, 79(2), 143–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/ruso.12029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stott, C., Livingstone, A., & Hoggett, J. (2008). Policing football crowds in England and Wales: a model of ‘good practice’?. Policing and Society, 18(3), 258–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439460802091641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stott, C., & Reicher, S. (2011). Mad Mobs and Englishmen? Myths and Realities of the 2011 Riots. London: Constable & Robinson.Google Scholar
Stuart, A., Thomas, E. F., & Donaghue, N. (2018). ‘I don’t really want to be associated with the self-righteous left extreme’: Disincentives to participation in collective action. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 6(1), 242–70. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v6i1.567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart, A., Thomas, E. F., Donaghue, N., & Russell, A. (2013). ‘We may be pirates, but we are not protesters’: Identity in the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. Political Psychology, 34(5), 753–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12016Google Scholar
Subasic, E., Reynolds, K. J., & Turner, J. C. (2008). The political solidarity model of social change: Dynamics of self-categorization in intergroup power relations. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(4), 330–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868308323223CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Subasic, E., Schmitt, M. T., & Reynolds, K. J. (2011). Are we all in this together? Co-victimization, inclusive social identity and collective action in solidarity with the disadvantaged. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 707–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02073.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, E. F., Zubielevitch, E., Sibley, C. G., & Osborne, D. (2020). Testing the social identity model of collective action longitudinally and across structurally disadvantaged and advantaged groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46(6), 823–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sweetman, J., Leach, C. W., Spears, R., Pratto, F., & Saab, R. (2013). ‘I have a dream’: A typology of social change goals. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 1(1), 293–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of inter-group conflict. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (eds.), The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole, 33–47.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S., & Tilly, C. (2007). Contentious politics and social movements. In Boix, C. & Stokes, S. C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199566020.003.0019Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. G. (2011). Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tausch, N., Becker, J. C., Spears, R., Christ, O., Saab, R., Singh, P., & Siddiqui, R. N. (2011). Explaining radical group behavior: Developing emotion and efficacy routes to normative and nonnormative collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(1), 129–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022728CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tausch, N., Saguy, T., & Bryson, J. (2015). How does intergroup contact affect social change? Its impact on collective action and individual mobility intentions among members of a disadvantaged group. Journal of Social Issues, 71(3), 536–53. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teixeira, C. P., Spears, R., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2019). Is Martin Luther King or Malcom X the more acceptable face of protest? High-status groups’ reactions to low-status groups’ collective action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(5):919–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000195Google Scholar
Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225–44. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164149CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, E. F., Bury, S. M., Louis, W. R., Amiot, C. E., Molenberghs, P., Crane, M. F., & Decety, J. (2019). Vegetarian, vegan, activist, radical: Using latent profile analysis to examine different forms of support for animal welfare. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 22(6), 836–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218824407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. F., & Louis, W. R. (2013). Doing democracy: The social psychological mobilization and consequences of collective action. Social Issues and Policy Review, 7(1), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-2409.2012.01047.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. F., Mavor, K. I., & McGarty, C. (2012). Social identities facilitate and encapsulate action-relevant constructs: A test of the social identity model of collective action. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 15(1), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211413619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Louis, W. (2014). Social interaction and psychological pathways to political engagement and extremism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. (2018). Giving versus acting: Using latent profile analysis to distinguish between benevolent and activist support for global poverty reduction. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12228CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Lala, G., Stuart, A., Hall, L. J., & Goddard, A. (2015). Whatever happened to Kony2012? Understanding a global Internet phenomenon as an emergent social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(3), 356–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2094CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Louis, W. R. (2014). Social interaction and psychological pathways to political engagement and extremism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1988CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., & Mavor, K. I. (2009). Aligning identities, emotions, and beliefs to create commitment to sustainable social and political action. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341563CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Reese, G., Berndsen, M., & Bliuc, A.-M. (2016). Where there is a (collective) will, there are (effective) ways: Integrating individual- and group-level factors in explaining humanitarian collective action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 42(12), 1678–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167216669134CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, E. F., McGarty, C., Stuart, A., Smith, L. G., & Bourgeois, L. (2019). Reaching consensus promotes the internalization of commitment to social change. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 22(5), 615–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430218780320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, E. F., Rathmann, L., & McGarty, C. (2017). From ‘I’ to ‘we’: Different forms of identity, emotion, and belief predict victim support volunteerism among nominal and active supporters. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47(4), 213–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, C. (1999). From interactions to outcomes in social movements. In Giugni, M., McAdam, D., Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (eds.), How Social Movements Matter. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 253–70. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.5749/j.ctttt706Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-Categorization Theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Uluğ, Ö. M., & Acar, Y. G. (2018). What happens after the protests? Understanding protest outcomes through multi-level social change. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/pac0000269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unsworth, K. L., & Fielding, K. S. (2014). It’s political: How the salience of one’s political identity changes climate change beliefs and policy support. Global Environmental Change, 27, 131–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dyke, N., & Amos, B. (2017). Social movement coalitions: Formation, longevity, and success. Sociology Compass, 11(7), e12489. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zomeren, M. (2013). Four core social‐psychological motivations to undertake collective action. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 7(6), 378–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zomeren, M., & Iyer, A. (2009). Introduction to the social and psychological dynamics of collective action. Journal of Social Issues, 65(4), 645–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2009.01618.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Zomeren, M., & Louis, W. R. (2017). Culture meets collective action: Exciting synergies and some lessons to learn for the future. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 20(3), 277–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430217690238CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2008). Toward an integrative social identity model of collective action: A quantitative research synthesis of three socio-psychological perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 134(4), 504–35. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.4.504CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Zomeren, M., Postmes, T., & Spears, R. (2012). On conviction’s collective consequences: Integrating moral conviction with the social identity model of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 52–71. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2010.02000.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Zomeren, M. , Spears, R. , Fischer, A. H. , & Leach, C. W. (2004). Put your money where your mouth is! Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 649–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vehlken, S. (2013). Zootechnologies: Swarming as a cultural technique. Theory, Culture and Society, 30(6), 110–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vestergren, S., Drury, J., & Chiriac, E. H. (2018). How collective action produces psychological change and how that change endures over time: A case study of an environmental campaign. British Journal of Social Psychology, 57(4), 855–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12270CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wagoner, B., Moghaddam, F. M., & Valsiner, J. (2018). The Psychology of Radical Social Change: From Rage to Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasow, O. (2020). Agenda seeding: How 1960s Black protests moved elites, public opinion and voting. American Political Science Review, 114(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305542000009XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, D. H. (2007). Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 142–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00333.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, T. L., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Does changing behavioral intentions engender behavior change? A meta-analysis of the experimental evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 249–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webber, D., Babush, M., Schori-Eyal, N., Vazeou-Nieuwenhuis, A., Hettiarachchi, M., Belanger, J. J., & Gelfand, M. J. (2017). The road to extremism: Field and experimental evidence that significance loss-induced need for closure fosters radicalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(2), 270–85. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000111Google ScholarPubMed
Webber, D., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2018). The social psychological makings of a terrorist. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 131–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2017.03.024CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2007). A guide to the advocacy coalition framework. In Fischer, F. & Miller, G. J. (eds.), Handbook of Public Policy Analysis: Theory, Politics, and Methods. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis Group, 123–36.Google Scholar
Whitehouse, H., Jong, J., Buhrmester, M. D., Gómez, Á., Bastian, B., Kavanagh, C. M., & McKay, R. (2017). The evolution of extreme cooperation via shared dysphoric experiences. Scientific Reports, 7, 44292. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep44292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitehouse, H., McQuinn, B., Buhrmester, M., & Swann, W. B. (2014). Brothers in arms: Libyan revolutionaries bond like family. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(50), 17783–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, V., Trump, K. S., & Einstein, K. L. (2018). Black Lives Matter: Evidence that police-caused deaths predict protest activity. Perspectives on Politics, 16(2), 400–15. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592717004273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. C., & Taylor, D. M. (1998). Responding to tokenism: Individual action in the face of collective injustice. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(4), 647–67.3.0.CO;2-0>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. C., Taylor, D. M., & Moghaddam, F. M. (1990). Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group – from acceptance to collective protest. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 994–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.994CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaal, M. P., Laar, C. V., Ståhl, T., Ellemers, N., & Derks, B. (2011). By any means necessary: The effects of regulatory focus and moral conviction on hostile and benevolent forms of collective action. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 670–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02069.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zak, P. J., & Barraza, J. A. (2013). The neurobiology of collective action. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 7, 211. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2013.00211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12
- Cited by