Publishing Scholarly Editions: Archives, Computing, and Experience

Christopher Ohge

doi:10.1017/9781108766739

Series: Elements in Publishing and Book Culture

Publishing Scholarly Editions

Archives, Computing, and Experience

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2021

Christopher Ohge

Show author details

Christopher Ohge: Affiliation:
School of Advanced Study, University of London

Summary

Publishing Scholarly Editions offers new intellectual tools for publishing digital editions that bring readers closer to the experimental practices of literature, editing, and reading. After the Introduction (Section 1), Sections 2 and 3 frame intentionality and data analysis as intersubjective, interrelated, and illustrative of experience-as-experimentation. These ideas are demonstrated in two editorial exhibitions of nineteenth-century works: Herman Melville's Billy Budd, Sailor, and the anti-slavery anthology The Bow in the Cloud, edited by Mary Anne Rawson. Section 4 uses pragmatism to rethink editorial principles and data modelling, arguing for a broader conception of the edition rooted in data collections and multimedia experience. The Conclusion (Section 5) draws attention to the challenges of publishing digital editions, and why digital editions have failed to be supported by the publishing industry. If publications are conceived as pragmatic inventions based on reliable, open-access data collections, then editing can embrace the critical, aesthetic, and experimental affordances of editions of experience.

Element contents

Summary
References

Get access

Keywords

textual scholarship digital humanities digital publishing book history nineteenth-century literature

Information

Type: Element
Information: Series: Elements in Publishing and Book Culture

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108766739 [Opens in a new window]

Online ISBN: 9781108766739

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication: 02 December 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Element purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahnert, R., Ahnert, S. E., Coleman, C., and Weingart, S. B., The Network Turn (Cambridge University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Almas, B., Khazraee, E., Miller, M. T., and Westgard, J., ‘Manuscript Study in Digital Spaces: The State of the Field and New Ways Forward’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 12.2 (2018), http://digitalhumanities.org:8081/dhq/vol/12/2/000374/000374.html.Google Scholar

Amis, K., Lucky Jim (Penguin, 2000).Google Scholar

Andrews, T., ‘The Third Way’, Variants 10 (2013), 61–76.Google Scholar

Anscombe, E., Intention (Oxford University Press, 1957).Google Scholar

Antonini, A., Benatti, F., and Blackburn-Daniels, S., ‘On Links To Be’, 31st ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (13–15 July 2020), Online, http://oro.open.ac.uk/70781/1/on%20links%20to%20be.pdf.Google Scholar

Aristotle, Rhetoric, ed. W. D. Ross (Clarendon Press, 1959), accessed on the Perseus Digital Library, ed. G. R. Crane, www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=urn:cts:greekLit:tlg0086.tlg038.Google Scholar

Audi, R. (ed.), ‘Ontological commitment’, in The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., and Blythe, M. A. (eds.), Critical Theory and Interaction Design (MIT Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Barnes, L., and Gatti, R., ‘The Cost of Open Access Books: A Publisher Writes’ (28 May 2020), http://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0173.0143.Google Scholar

Berners-Lee, T., ‘Hypertext and Our Collective Destiny’ (1995), www.w3.org/Talks/9510_Bush/Talk.html.Google Scholar

Berners-Lee, T., ‘Linked Data’, www.w3.org/DesignIssues/LinkedData.html.Google Scholar

Bernstein, R. J., The Pragmatic Turn (Polity Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Beshero-Bondar, E., and Donovan-Condron, K., ‘Modelling Mary Russell Mitford’s Networks’, in A. O. Winckles and A. Rehbein (eds.), Women’s Literary Networks and Romanticism (Liverpool University Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Blackburn, S., Truth (Profile, 2017).Google Scholar

Blackwell, A., ‘What Does Digital Content Mean? Umberto Eco and The Open Work’, in Bardzell, Bardzell, and Blythe (eds.), Critical Theory and Interaction Design, pp. 167–86.Google Scholar

Blaney, J., Milligan, S., Steer, M., and Winters, J., Doing Digital History: A Beginner’s Guide to Working with Text as Data (University of Manchester Press, 2021).Google Scholar

Bodard, G., and Stoyanova, S., ‘Epigraphers and Encoders: Strategies for Teaching and Learning Digital Epigraphy’, in G. Bodard and M. Romanello (eds.), Digital Classics Outside the Echo-Chamber (Ubiquity Press, 2016), doi: https://doi.org/10.5334/bat.Google Scholar

Bodard, G., and Yordanova, P., ‘Publication, Testing and Visualization with EFES: A Tool for All Stages of the EpiDoc XML Editing Process’, Digitalia 65.1 (2020), https://doi.org/10.24193/subbdigitalia.2020.1.02.Google Scholar

Bode, K., ‘The Equivalence of “Close” and “Distant” Reading; or, Toward a New Object for Data-Rich Literary History’, Modern Language Quarterly 78.1 (2017), 77–106.Google Scholar

Bode, K., Reading by Numbers (Anthem, 2012).Google Scholar

Bode, K., ‘Why You Can’t Model Away Bias’, Modern Language Quarterly 81.1 (2020), 95–124.Google Scholar

Bordalejo, B., ‘Digital versus Analogue Textual Scholarship or The Revolution Is Just in the Title’, Digital Philology: A Journal of Medieval Cultures 7.1 (Spring 2018), 7–28.Google Scholar

Bowers, F., Bibliography and Textual Criticism (Clarendon, 1964).Google Scholar

Bowles, P., Conversations with Paul Bowles, ed. Caponi, G. (University Press of Mississippi, 1993).Google Scholar

Box, G. E. P., and Luceño, A., Statistical Control: By Monitoring and Feedback Adjustment (John Wiley & Sons, 1997).Google Scholar

Brandom, R., Between Saying and Doing: Toward an Analytic Pragmatism (Oxford University Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Brentano, F., Psychologie vom empirischen Standpunkt [Psychology from an Empirical Standpoint] (Duncker & Humblot, 1874).Google Scholar

Brooks, G., To Disembark (Third World Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Brown, D., ‘William Lloyd Garrison, Transatlantic Abolitionism and Colonisation in the Mid Nineteenth Century: The Revival of the Peculiar Solution?’, Slavery and Abolition 33.2 (2012), 233–50.CrossRef Google Scholar

Browne, T., A True and Full Coppy of That Which Was Most Imperfectly and Surreptitiously Printed Before under the Name of: Religio Medici (London, 1643).Google Scholar

Bryant, J., ‘Editing Melville in Manuscript’, Leviathan 21.2 (June 2019), 107–32.Google Scholar

Bryant, J., The Fluid Text: A Theory of Revision and Editing for Book and Screen (University of Michigan Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Bryant, J., Melville Unfolding: Sexuality, Politics, and the Versions of Typee (University of Michigan Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Bryant, J., Kelley, W., and Ohge, C. (eds.), Versions of Billy Budd, Sailor, Melville Electronic Library (2019), https://melville.electroniclibrary.org/versions-of-billy-budd.html.Google Scholar

Burrows, J. F., Computation into Criticism (Oxford University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Burrows, J. F., ‘Textual Analysis’, in Schreibman, S., Siemens, R., and Unsworth, J. (eds.), A Companion to Digital Humanities (Blackwell, 2004), www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/.Google Scholar

Bushell, S., Text as Process: Creative Composition in Wordsworth, Tennyson and Emily Dickinson (University of Virginia Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Carroll, N., ‘Interpretation and Intention: The Debate between Hypothetical and Actual Intentionalism’, Metaphilosophy 31.1–2 (January 2000), 75–95.Google Scholar

Clement, T., Hagenmaier, W., and Knies, J. L., ‘Toward a Notion of the Archive of the Future: Impressions of Practice by Librarians, Archivists, and Digital Humanities Scholars’, Library Quarterly 83.2 (April 2013), 112–30.Google Scholar

Craig, E., Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis (Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Cramer, J. S. (ed.), The Portable Emerson (Penguin, 2014).Google Scholar

Crane, G., Bamman, D., Cerrato, L., Jones, A., Mimno, D., Packel, A., Sculley, D., and Weaver, G., ‘Beyond Digital Incunabula: Modeling the Next Generation of Digital Libraries’, Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Digital Libraries (2006), Perseus Project, Tufts, 353–66, http://hdl.handle.net/10427/36131.Google Scholar

Crossley-Holland, K. (trs.), The Exeter Book Riddles (Enitharmon Press, 2008).Google Scholar

Crymble, A., ‘Digital Library Search Preferences amongst Historians and Genealogists: British History Online User Survey’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 10.4 (2016), www.digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/10/4/000270/000270.html.Google Scholar

Crymble, A., Technology and the Historian: Transformations in the Digital Age (University of Illinois Press, 2021).Google Scholar

Cummings, J., ‘Opening the Book: Data Models and Distractions in Digital Scholarly Editing’, International Journal of Digital Humanities (July 2019), 179–93, https://doi.org/10.1007/s42803-019-00016-6.Google Scholar

Daniels, J., and Thistlethwaite, P., ‘Being a Scholar in the Digital Era’, in J. Daniels and P. Thistlethwaite, Transforming Scholarly Practice for the Public Good (Policy Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Dasenbrock, R. W. (ed.), Literary Theory after Davidson (Pennsylvania State University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Davidson, D., Essential Davidson (Oxford University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Davidson, D., Truth, Language, and History (Oxford University Press, 2005).CrossRef Google Scholar

Davie, D., Essex Poems: 1963–1967 (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1969).Google Scholar

Dekker, R., Bleeker, E., Buitendijk, B., Kulsdom, A., and Birnbaum, D., ‘TAGML: A Markup Language of Many Dimensions’, in Proceedings of Balisage: The Markup Conference 2018 21 (2018), DOI: https://doi.org/10.4242/BalisageVol21.HaentjensDekker01.Google Scholar

Deppmann, J., Ferrer, D., and Groden, M. (eds.), Genetic Criticism: Texts and Avant-textes (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Dewey, J., Art as Experience (Penguin, 2005).Google Scholar

Dewey, J., Human Nature and Conduct (Modern Library, 1922).Google Scholar

Dewey, J., The Middle Works, 1899–1924, Volume 6: 1910–1911, ed. Boydston, J. A. (Southern Illinois University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Dewey, J., The Philosophy of John Dewey, ed. J. McDermott (University of Chicago Press, 1973).Google Scholar

Drucker, J. ‘Humanities Approaches to Graphical Display’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 5.1 (2011), http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/5/1/000091/000091.html.Google Scholar

Earhart, A., Traces of the Old, Uses of the New (University of Michigan Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Eco, U., ‘The Open Work (1989)’, trans. Cancogni, Anne, in Bardzell, Bardzell, and Blythe (eds.), Critical Theory and Interaction Design, pp. 145–66.Google Scholar

Edel, L. (ed.) Henry James: The Selected Letters (Harvard University Press, 1987).Google Scholar

Eggert, P., Securing the Past (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Empson, W., Seven Types of Ambiguity (New Directions, 1966).Google Scholar

Eve, M., Close Reading with Computers: Textual Scholarship,Computational Formalism, and David Mitchell’s Cloud Atlas (Stanford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Ezell, M. J. M., ‘Editing Early Modern Women’s Manuscripts: Theory, Electronic Editions, and the Accidental Copy-Text’, Literature Compass 7.2 (2010), 102–9.Google Scholar

Fazi, M. B., Contingent Computation: Abstraction, Experience, and Indeterminacy in Computational Aesthetics (Rowman and Littlefield, 2018).Google Scholar

Felski, R., The Limits of Critique (University of Chicago Press, 2015).Google Scholar

Ferguson, M., Subject to Others: British Women Writers and Colonial Slavery, 1670–1834 (Routledge, 1992; 2014 reprint).Google Scholar

Franzini, G., Terras, M., and Mahony, S., ‘Digital Editions of Text: Surveying User Requirements in the Digital Humanities’, Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage (February 2019), https://doi.org/10.1145/3230671.Google Scholar

Gabler, H. W., Text Genetics and Literary Modernism (OpenBook Publishers, 2018), https://doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0120.Google Scholar

Garcia, T. S., ‘Working Together: The Digital World and English Studies’, English Association Blog, 25 February 2019, www2.le.ac.uk/offices/english-association/news-1/working-together-the-digital-world-and-english-studies-by-tiago-sousa-garcia.Google Scholar

Gaskell, P., A New Introduction to Bibliography (Oak Knoll Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Gil, A., ‘How (and Why) to Generate a Static Website Using Jekyll, Part 1’, Chronicle of Higher Education, 31 August 2015, www.chronicle.com/blogs/profhacker/jekyll1/60913.Google Scholar

Gitelman, L. (ed.), “Raw Data” Is an Oxymoron (MIT Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Goldstone, A., ‘Teaching Quantitative Methods: What Makes It Hard (in Literary Studies)’, Debates in the Digital Humanities (2018), https://doi.org/doi:10.7282/T3G44SKG.Google Scholar

Grafton, A., Inky Fingers: The Making of Books in Early Modern Europe (Harvard University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Greenberg, S., A Poetics of Editing (Palgrave Macmillan, 2018).Google Scholar

Greetham, D. C. (ed.), Scholarly Editing: A Guide to Research (Modern Language Association of America, 1995).Google Scholar

Greetham, D. C., ‘Textual Forensics’, PMLA 111.1 (January 1996), 32–51, https://doi.org/10.2307/463132.Google Scholar

Greetham, D. C., Textual Scholarship: An Introduction (Garland, 1994).Google Scholar

Greetham, D. C., Theories of the Text (Oxford University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Greg, W. W., ‘The Rationale of Copy-Text’, Studies in Bibliography 3 (1950–1), 19–36.Google Scholar

Grice, H. P., Studies in the Way of Words (Harvard University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Grimstad, P., Experience and Experimental Writing: Literary Pragmatism from Emerson to the Jameses (Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Hancher, M., ‘Three Kinds of Intention’, Modern Language Notes 87 (December 1972), 827–51.Google Scholar

Hannon, M., What’s the Point of Knowledge? (Oxford University Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Hirst, R., ‘The Making of The Innocents Abroad: 1867–1872’ (PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley, 1975).Google Scholar

Hooks, A. G., and Lesser, Z. (eds.), Shakespeare Census (created 2018). www.shakespearecensus.org.Google Scholar

Housman, A. E., ‘The Application of Thought to Textual Criticism’, Proceedings of the Classical Association 18 (London, 1921), 67–84.Google Scholar

Howard-Hill, T. H., ‘W. W. Greg as Bibliographer’, Textual Cultures 4.2 (Autumn 2009), 63–75.Google Scholar

Huzzey, R., Freedom Burning: Anti-Slavery and Empire in Victorian Britain (Cornell University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Hyman, W., ‘The Inner Lives of Renaissance Machines’, in Curran, K. (ed.), Renaissance Personhood: Materiality, Taxonomy, Process (Edinburgh University Press, 2020), 44–61.Google Scholar

James, W., and McDermott, J. J. (ed.), The Writings of William James: A Comprehensive Edition (University of Chicago Press, 1977).Google Scholar

Jockers, M., Macroanalysis (University of Illinois Press, 2013).Google Scholar

Jockers, M., Text Analysis with R for Students of Literature (Springer, 2014).Google Scholar

Kestenbaum, V., The Grace and Severity of the Ideal: John Dewey and the Transcendent (University of Chicago Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Lamarque, P., ‘Wittgenstein, Literature, and the Idea of a Practice’, British Journal of Aesthetics 50 (2010), 375–88.Google Scholar

Lamarque, P., Work and Object (Oxford University Press, 2010).Google Scholar

Lavagnino, J., ‘Access’, Literary and Linguistic Computing 24.1 (2009), 63–76, https://doi.org/10.1093/llc/fqn038.Google Scholar

Maes, H., ‘Intention, Interpretation, and Contemporary Visual Art’, British Journal of Aesthetics 50.2 (April 2010), 121–38.Google Scholar

Manns, J., ‘Intentionalism in John Dewey’s Aesthetics’, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 23.3 (Summer, 1987), 411–23.Google Scholar

McCarthy, J., and Wright, P., Technology as Experience (MIT Press, 2004).Google Scholar

McCarty, W., ‘Modelling the Actual, Simulating the Possible’, in J. Flanders and F. Jannidis (eds.), The Shape of Data in Digital Humanities: Modeling Texts and Text-Based Materials (Routledge, 2018).Google Scholar

McDaniel, C., The Problem of Democracy in the Age of Slavery: Garrisonian Abolitionists and Transatlantic Reform (Louisiana State University Press, 2013).Google Scholar

McGann, J., A Critique of Modern Textual Criticism (University of Virginia Press, 1992).Google Scholar

McGann, J., A New Republic of Letters (Harvard University Press, 2014).Google Scholar

McGann, J., Radiant Textuality: Literature after the World Wide Web (Palgrave, 2001).Google Scholar

McKenzie, D. F., Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts (Cambridge University Press, 1999).Google Scholar

Melville, H., Billy Budd, Sailor and Other Uncompleted Writings, eds., Hayford, H., MacDougall, A. A., R. A. Sandberg, and G. T. Tanselle, Volume 13 of The Writings of Herman Melville (Northwestern University Press and the Newberry Library, 2017).Google Scholar

Melville, H., The Piazza Tales and Other Prose Pieces, 1839–1860, eds., Hayford, H., MacDougall, A. A., and Tanselle, G. T., Volume 9 of The Writings of Herman Melville (Northwestern University Press and The Newberry Library, 1987).Google Scholar

Melville, H., Typee: A Peep at Polynesian Life, eds., Hayford, H., Parker, H., and Tanselle, G. T., Volume 1 of The Writings of Herman Melville (Northwestern University Press and the Newberry Library, 1968).Google Scholar

Menand, L., Discovering Modernism: T. S. Eliot and His Context (Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Menand, L. (ed.), Pragmatism: A Reader (Vintage, 1997).Google Scholar

Milton, J., ‘Areopagitica (1644)’, in Flannagan, R. (ed.), The Riverside Milton (Houghton Mifflin, 1998).Google Scholar

Misak, C., Frank Ramsey: A Sheer Excess of Powers (Oxford University Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Mole, T., What the Victorians Made of Romanticism (Princeton University Press, 2017).Google Scholar

Nelson, T., ‘A Cosmology for a Different Computer Universe: Data Model, Mechanisms, Virtual Machine and Visualization Infrastructure’, Journal of Digital Information 5.1 (2006). https://journals.tdl.org/jodi/index.php/jodi/article/view/131/129.Google Scholar

Ohge, C., ‘Melville Incomplete’, American Literary History 31.1 (Spring 2019), 139–50.Google Scholar

Ohge, C., ‘Melville’s Late Reading and the Revisions in the Billy Budd Manuscript’, in Yothers, B. (ed.), Critical Insights: Billy Budd (Salem Press, 2017), pp. 93–111.Google Scholar

Ohge, C., and Olsen-Smith, S., ‘Digital Text Analysis at Melville’s Marginalia Online’, Leviathan: A Journal of Melville Studies 20.2 (2018), 1–16.Google Scholar

Ohge, C., and Tupman, C., ‘Encoding and Analysis, and Encoding as Analysis, in Textual Editing’, in S. Dunn and K. Schuster (eds.), The Routledge International Handbook to Digital Humanities Research Methods, ch. 17 (Routledge, 2020).Google Scholar

Ohge, C., Olsen-Smith, S., and Smith, E. B., with Brimhall, A., Howley, B., Shanks, L., and Smith, L., ‘“At the Axis of Reality”: Melville’s Marginalia in the Dramatic Works of William Shakespeare’, Leviathan: A Journal of Melville Studies 20.2 (2018), 37–67.CrossRef Google Scholar

Olsen-Smith, S., and Norberg, P. (eds.), Melville’s Marginalia Online. http://melvillesmarginalia.org/.Google Scholar

Olsen-Smith, S., ‘The Inscription of Walt Whitman’s ‘Live Oak, with Moss’ Sequence: A Restorative Edition’, Scholarly Editing 33 (2012), http://scholarlyediting.org/2012/editions/intro.liveoakwithmoss.html Google Scholar

Ozment, K., ‘A Rationale for Feminist Bibliography’, Textual Cultures 13.1 (2020), 149–78. DOI: 10.14434/textual.v13i1.30076.Google Scholar

Pannapacker, W., ‘Digital Humanities Triumphant?’ in Gold, M. K. (ed.), Debates in Digital Humanities (University of Minnesota Press, 2012), https://doi.org/10.5749/9781452963754.Google Scholar

Parker, H., Flawed Texts and Verbal Icons (Northwestern University Press, 1984).Google Scholar

Parker, H., Reading Billy Budd (Northwestern University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Pierazzo, E., Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories, Models, and Methods (Ashgate, 2015).Google Scholar

Piper, A., Enumerations: Data and Literary Study (University of Chicago Press, 2018).Google Scholar

Plato, Parmenides, in H. N. Fowler (ed. and trs.), Plato in Twelve Volumes: With an English Translation, Cratylus, Parmenides, Greater Hippias, Lesser Hippias (W. Heinemann, 1926), accessed on the Perseus Digital Library, ed. G. R. Crane, www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus%3atext%3a1999.01.0174%3atext%3dParm.Google Scholar

Poirier, R., Poetry and Pragmatism (Faber and Faber, 1992).Google Scholar

Poirier, R., ‘Why Do Pragmatists Want to Be Like Poets?’, in Dickstein, M. (ed.), The Revival of Pragmatism (Duke University Press, 1999), pp. 347–61.Google Scholar

Posner, M., and Klein, L. F., ‘Editor’s Introduction: Data as Media’, Feminist Media Histories 3.3 (2017), 1–8, https://doi.org/10.1525/fmh.2017.3.3.1.Google Scholar

Price, L., The Anthology and the Rise of the Novel: From Richardson to George Eliot (Cambridge University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Putnam, H., ‘Philosophy and Our Mental Life’, in H. Putnam (ed.), Philosophical Papers, Volume 2: Mind, Language and Reality (Cambridge University Press, 1975), pp. 291–303.Google Scholar

Putnam, H., Pragmatism: An Open Question (Blackwell, 1995).Google Scholar

Putnam, H., Reason, Truth, and History (Cambridge University Press, 1981).Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O., From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-philosophical Essays, 2nd ed. (Harvard University Press, 1980).Google Scholar

Quine, W. V. O., Philosophy of Logic (Prentice-Hall, 1970).Google Scholar

Ramsey, S., ‘The Hermeneutics of Screwing Around’, in Kee, K. (ed.), Pastplay: Teaching and Learning History with Technology (University of Michigan Press, 2014), pp. 111–30.Google Scholar

Rasmussen, K. S. G., ‘Reading or Using a Digital Edition? Reader Roles in Scholarly Editions’, in M. J. Driscoll and E. Pierazzo (eds.), Digital Scholarly Editing: Theories and Practices (OpenBook, 2016), http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/OBP.0095.07.Google Scholar

Ricks, C., Essays in Appreciation (Oxford University Press, 1996).Google Scholar

Ricks, C., ‘In Theory’, London Review of Books 3.7 (16 April 1981), 3–6.Google Scholar

Ricks, C., ‘To Criticize the Critic’, Essays in Criticism 69.4 (October 2019), 476, https://doi.org/10.1093/escrit/cgz021.Google Scholar

Rinard, S., ‘Pragmatic Skepticism’, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research (in press), www.susannarinard.com/s/Pragmatic-Skepticism-shhn.docx.Google Scholar

Robinson, P., ‘Toward a Theory of Digital Editions’, Variants 10 (2013), 105–31, https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401209021_009.Google Scholar

Rockwell, G., and Sinclair, S., Hermeneutica (MIT Press, 2016).Google Scholar

Rorty, R., Consequences of Pragmatism (University of Minnesota Press, 1982).Google Scholar

Rorty, R., Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge University Press, 1989).CrossRef Google Scholar

Ryle, G., ‘John Locke Re-edited’, Times Literary Supplement (19 September 1975), p. 1043.Google Scholar

Sá Pereira, M. P., ‘Mixed Methodological Digital Humanities’, in Gold, M. K. and Klein, L. F. (eds.), Debates in Digital Humanities (University of Minnesota Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Scheinfeld, T., ‘Sunset for Ideology, Sunrise for Methodology?’, in M. K. Gold (ed.), Debates in the Digital Humanities (University of Minnesota Press, 2012), https://doi.org/10.5749/9781452963754.Google Scholar

Schloen, S., and Schloen, D., ‘Beyond Gutenberg: Transcending the Document Paradigm in Digital Humanities’, Digital Humanities Quarterly 8.4 (2014).Google Scholar

Searle, J., Intentionality (Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Searle, J. ‘Reiterating the Differences: A Reply to Derrida’, Glyph 1 (1977), 198–208.Google Scholar

Shakespeare, W., Henry IV, Part I, The Arden Shakespeare, ed. Humphreys, A. R. (Methuen, 1965).Google Scholar

Shakespeare, W., Richard III, The Arden Shakespeare, ed. Siemon, J., 3rd ed. (Bloomsbury, 2009).CrossRef Google Scholar

Shillingsburg, P., From Gutenberg to Google (Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar

Silge, J., and Robinson, D., Text Mining with R: A Tidy Approach (2020), www.tidytextmining.com/.Google Scholar

Smithies, J., The Digital Humanities and the Digital Modern (Palgrave Macmillan, 2017).Google Scholar

So, R. J., ‘All Models Are Wrong’, PMLA 132.3 (2017), 668–73.Google Scholar

Soames, S., ‘Analytic Philosophy of Language’, in K. Becker and I. Thomson (eds.), The Cambridge History of Philosophy, 1945–2015 (Cambridge University Press, 2019). doi:10.1017/9781316779651.Google Scholar

Sperberg-McQueen, M., ‘Representing Concurrent Document Structures Using Trojan Horse Markup’, Proceedings of Balisage: The Markup Conference, Balisage Series on Markup Technologies, vol. 21 (2018), DOI: https://doi.org/10.4242/BalisageVol21.Sperberg-McQueen01.Google Scholar

Stockwell, P., and Mahlberg, M., ‘Mind-Modelling with Corpus Stylistics in David Copperfield’, Language and Literature 24. 2 (May 2015), 129–47, doi:10.1177/0963947015576168.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. T., ‘The Editorial Problem of Final Authorial Intention’, Studies in Bibliography 29 (1976), 167–211.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. T., ‘Historicism and Critical Editing’, Studies in Bibliography 39 (1986), 1–46.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. T., ‘Print History and Other History’, Studies in Bibliography 48 (1995), 268–89.Google Scholar

Tanselle, G. T., Rationale of Textual Criticism (University of Pennsylvania Press).Google Scholar

Taylor, P., Condition: The Ageing of Art (Paul Holberton, 2015).Google Scholar

Thompson, J. B., Books in the Digital Age: The Transformation of Academic and Higher Education Publishing in Britain and the United States (Polity Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Thompson, J. B., Book Wars: The Digital Revolution in Publishing (Polity Press, 2021).Google Scholar

Thorpe, J., Principles of Textual Criticism (Huntington Library, 1972).Google Scholar

Underwood, T., Distant Horizons (University of Chicago Press, 2019).Google Scholar

Van Hulle, D., Textual Awareness: A Genetic Study of Late Manuscripts by Joyce, Proust, and Mann (University of Michigan Press, 2004).Google Scholar

Vinopal, J., and McCormick, M., ‘Supporting Digital Scholarship in Research Libraries: Scalability and Sustainability’, Journal of Library Administration 53.1 (2013), 27–42, https://doi.org/10.1080/01930826.2013.756689.Google Scholar

Vinsel, L., and Russell, A., The Innovation Delusion: How Our Obsession with the New Has Disrupted the Work That Matters Most (Currency, 2020).Google Scholar

Waldman, D. (ed.), Mark Rothko in New York (Guggenheim Museum, 1994).Google Scholar

Weizenbaum, J., Computer Power and Human Reason: From Judgement to Calculation (W. H. Freeman and Company, 1976).Google Scholar

Wenke, J., ‘Melville’s Indirection: Billy Budd, the Genetic Text, and “the Deadly Space Between”’, in Yannella, D. (ed.), New Essays on Billy Budd (Cambridge University Press, 2002), pp. 114–44.Google Scholar

Werner, M. (ed.), Writing In Time: Emily Dickinson’s Master Hours (Amherst College Press, 2021), p. 11, https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.12023683.Google Scholar

Werstine, P., Early Modern Playhouse Manuscripts and the Editing of Shakespeare (Cambridge University Press, 2012).Google Scholar

Whitman, W., Leaves of Grass (New York, 1891), accessed at the Walt Whitman Archive, eds., M. Cohen, E. Folsom, and K. Price, https://whitmanarchive.org/published/LG/1891/poems/193.Google Scholar

Williams, S., Data Action: Using Data for Public Good (MIT Press, 2020).Google Scholar

Williams, W. P., and Abbott, C. S., An Introduction to Bibliographical and Textual Studies, 4th ed. (Modern Language Association of America, 2009).Google Scholar

Wimsatt, W. K., and Beardsley, M. C., ‘The Intentional Fallacy’, Sewanee Review 54.3 (1946), 468–88.Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L., Philosophical Investigations, trans. Anscombe, G. E. M., 2nd ed. (Blackwell, 1997).Google Scholar

Wittgenstein, L., Remarks on Colour (Blackwell, 1977).Google Scholar

Wood, M., ‘Radical Publishing’, in M. F. Suarez, S.J. and M. L. Turner (eds.), The Cambridge History of the Book in Britain, Volume 5: 1695–1830 (Cambridge University Press, 2009).Google Scholar

Woudhuysen, H. R. (ed.), Samuel Johnson on Shakespeare (Penguin, 1989).Google Scholar

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Why this information is here

This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.

Accessibility Information

Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.