A Semiotic Approach to Open Notations: Ambiguity as Opportunity

Tristan McKay

doi:10.1017/9781108884389

Series: Elements in Music since 1945

A Semiotic Approach to Open Notations

Ambiguity as Opportunity

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 April 2021

Tristan McKay

Summary

Along with twentieth-century developments in playing techniques, technologies, and concepts of musical sound, the notations employed by composers have also changed. Composers of what Umberto Eco calls 'open works' often employ intentionally ambiguous music notations. These open notations ask the performer to play a radical and active role in co-creating the musical work. Scores that feature open notations have been part of the Western classical music landscape since the mid-twentieth century, and continue to have a vibrant community of practitioners today. In this Element, Tristan McKay considers intersections of ambiguity, authority, and identity in works with open notations. He develops a semiotic approach to open notation analysis and puts it into practice with in-depth analyses of openly notated works by Earle Brown, Will Redman, and Leah Asher.

Element contents

Summary
References

Get access

Keywords

open notations ambiguity semiotics open work Earle Brown

Type: Element
Information: Series: Elements in Music since 1945

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108884389 [Opens in a new window]

Online ISBN: 9781108884389

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication: 29 April 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Element purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Bibliography

Asher, Leah, “Home Page.” Leah Asher official website. Accessed December 17, 2019. www.leahasher.com.Google Scholar

Asher, Leah, TRAPPIST-1 (Independently published, 2017).Google Scholar

Brent, Joseph, Charles Sanders Peirce: A Life (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993).Google Scholar

Brown, Earle, FOLIO (1952/53) and 4 Systems (1954) (New York: Associated Music, 1961).Google Scholar

Brown, Earle, “The Notation and Performance of New Music,” Musical Quarterly 72, no.2 (1986), 180–201.Google Scholar

Brown, Earle, “On December 1952,” [1970; transcription of audio] American Music 26, no. 1 (Spring 2008), 1–12.Google Scholar

Brown, Earle, “Prefatory Note,” in FOLIO (1952/53) and 4 Systems (1954) (New York: Associated Music, 1961).Google Scholar

Byrd, Donald, “Extremes of Conventional Music Notation,” Indiana University Bloomington. Revised mid-October 2018. Accessed December 17, 2019. http://homes.soic.indiana.edu/donbyrd/CMNExtremes.htm Google Scholar

Cady, Jason, “An Overview of Earle Brown’s Techniques and Media,” in Beyond Notation: The Music of Earle Brown, edited by Kim, Rebecca Y. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2017), 1–20.Google Scholar

Cage, John, Notations, edited by Knowles, Alison and Cage, John (New York: Something Else Press, 1969).Google Scholar

Chandler, Daniel, Semiotics: The Basics, 2nd edition (London: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar

Chumley, Lily, and Harkness, Nicholas, “Introduction: QUALIA,” Anthropological Theory 13, no. 1–2 (2013), 3–11.Google Scholar

Cowell, Henry, “Explanation of Symbols and Playing Instructions,” in Piano Music by Henry Cowell (New York: Associated Music, 1960).Google Scholar

Eco, Umberto, The Open Work, translated by Anna Cancogni (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989).Google Scholar

Goehr, Lydia, “Being True to the Work,” Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 47, no.1 (Winter 1989), 55–67.CrossRef Google Scholar

Goehr, Lydia, The Imaginary Museum of Musical Works, revised edition (London: Oxford University Press, 2007).Google Scholar

Goodman, Nelson, Languages of Art [1968], new edition (Indianapolis, IN: Hackett, 1976).Google Scholar

Gresser, Clemens, “Earle Brown’s ‘Creative Ambiguity’ and Ideas of Co-creatorship in Selected Works,” Contemporary Music Review 26, no. 3/4 (June/August 2007), 377–394.Google Scholar

Harkness, Nicholas, “Softer Soju in South Korea,” Anthropological Theory 13, no. 1–2 (2013), 12–30.Google Scholar

Harkness, Nicholas, Songs of Seoul: An Ethnography of Voice and Voicing in Christian South Korea (Berkeley: University of California Press, 2014).Google Scholar

Hoover, Elizabeth, “Collage and the Feedback Condition of Earle Brown’s Calder Piece,” in Beyond Notation: The Music of Earle Brown, edited by Kim, Rebecca Y. (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2017), 159–187.Google Scholar

Jakobson, Roman, “Closing Statement: Linguistics and Poetics,” in Style in Language, edited by Sebeok, Thomas A. (Cambridge: MIT Press, 1960), 350–377.Google Scholar

Kanno, Mieko, “Prescriptive Notation: Limits and Challenges,” Contemporary Music Review 26, no. 2 (2007), 231–254.Google Scholar

Karkoschka, Erhard, Notation in New Music: A Critical Guide to Interpretation and Realization, translated by Ruth Koenig (New York: Praeger, 1972).Google Scholar

Kulvicki, John, “Analog Representation and the Parts Principle,” Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (2015), 165–180.CrossRef Google Scholar

Lévi-Strauss, Claude, Structural Anthropology, translated by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf (New York: Basic Books, 1963).Google Scholar

Lidov, David, Elements of Semiotics: A Neo-structuralist Perspective, 2nd edition (2017). https://davidlidov.com/about/elements-of-semiotics–2017/Google Scholar

Mavromatis, Panayotis, “A Multi-tiered Approach for Analyzing Expressive Timing in Musical Performance,” in Mathematics and Computation in Music, edited by Chew, Elaine, Childs, Adrian, and Chuan, Ching-Hua (Berlin: Springer, 2009), 193–204.Google Scholar

McKay, Tristan, “Graphic Notations As Creative Resilience in Redman’s Book (2006),” in Semiotics 2018: Resilience in an Age of Relation, edited by Owens, Geoffrey Ross and Katić, Elvira (Charlottesville, VA: Philosophy Documentation Center Press, 2019), 157–171.Google Scholar

Merrell, Floyd, “Charles Sanders Peirce’s Concept of the Sign,” in The Routledge Companion to Semiotics and Linguistics, edited by Cobley, Paul (London: Routledge, 2001), 28–39.Google Scholar

Mitchell, W. J. T, “Pictures and Paragraphs: Nelson Goodman,” in Iconology: Image, Text, Ideology (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1986), 47–74.Google Scholar

Munn, Nancy D, The Fame of Gawa: A Symbolic Study of Value Transformation in a Massim (Papua New Guinea) Society (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1986).Google Scholar

Nonken, Marilyn, The Spectral Piano: From Liszt, Scriabin, and Debussy to the Digital Age (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014).CrossRef Google Scholar

Parmentier, Richard, Signs in Society: Studies in Semiotic Anthropology (Indianapolis: Indiana University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Peirce, Charles S., Hartshorne, Charles, Weiss, Paul, and Burks, Arthur W., Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 1965).Google Scholar

The Peirce Edition Project, “History” (2015). Accessed December 17, 2019. http://peirce.iupui.edu/#history Google Scholar

The Peirce Edition Project, “Welcome to the Peirce Edition Project” (2015). Accessed December 17, 2019. http://peirce.iupui.edu/index.html Google Scholar

Redman, Will, “Book,” Will Redman official website (2006). Accessed December 17, 2019. www.willredman.com/book.html Google Scholar

Redman, Will, “Deck,” Will Redman official website (2016). Accessed December 17, 2019. www.willredman.com/deck.html Google Scholar

Redman, Will, “Honoring Vertical Excellence,” Will Redman official website (2011). Accessed December 17, 2019. www.willredman.com/hve.html Google Scholar

Redman, Will, “Long Bio,” Will Redman official website (2010). Accessed December 17, 2019. www.willredman.com/long_bio.html Google Scholar

Redman, Will, “Scroll,” Will Redman official website (2016). Accessed December 17, 2019. www.willredman.com/scroll.html Google Scholar

Redman, Will, “Short Bio,” Will Redman official website (2010). Accessed December 17, 2019. www.willredman.com/short_bio.html Google Scholar

Redman, Will, “Will Redman: Graphic Ideas in Sound,” video interview by Molly Sheridan, New Music Box (blog) (July 27, 2011). Accessed December 17, 2019. https://vimeo.com/26929349 Google Scholar

Robey, David, Introduction to The Open Work, by Umberto Eco (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1989), vii–xxxii.Google Scholar

Ruwet, Nicholas, and Everist, Mark, “Methods of Analysis in Musicology,” Music Analysis 6, no. 1/2 (March–July 1987), 3–9, 11–36.Google Scholar

Sauer, Theresa, Notations 21 (New York: Mark Batty, 2009).Google Scholar

de Saussure, Ferdinand, Course in General Linguistics [1916], new edition translated by Roy Harris (La Salle, IL: Open Court, 1986).Google Scholar

Tormey, Alan, “Indeterminacy and Identity in Art,” The Monist 58, no. 2 (April 1974), 203–215.Google Scholar

Tufte, Edward R., The Visual Display of Quantitative Information, (Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press, 1983).Google Scholar

Tullett, Barrie, Typewriter Art: A Modern Anthology (London: Laurence King, 2014).Google Scholar

University of Chicago, “History,” Department of Anthropology. Accessed December 17, 2019. https://anthropology.uchicago.edu/about-us/history Google Scholar

Urban, Greg, “Entextualization, Replication, and Power,” in Natural Histories of Discourse, edited by Silverstein, Michael and Urban, Greg (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1996), 21–44.Google Scholar

Waugh, Linda, “The Poetic Function in the Theory of Roman Jakobson,” Poetics Today 2, no. 1a (Autumn 1980), 57–82.Google Scholar