Element contents
Topics in Public Administration
Perspectives from Computational Social Sciences and Corpus Linguistics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 November 2024
Summary
This inductive examination of the topics in the public administration literature using computational social science and corpus linguistics (17 journals, N=12,760 articles, 1991–2019) reveals a new landscape of public administration topics, changes in topics over time and their distribution: Topic modelling of the stock of the whole corpus identifies 50 topics: the top ten topics included health care, federal government, performance management, environmental regulation, HRM and networks and accounted for just over a third of scholarship between 1991–2019. Focal topics identified in individual journals identified similarities with popular topics in the whole corpus – networks, health care, HRM – and less frequently examined topics including gender and diversity and partnerships. Analysis of topics over time shows a substantial flow in topics moving from a country and practice focus in the early stages of our study period to concepts such as governance, networks and citizens in the late stages (2015–2019).
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009378697Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 09 January 2025
References
References
Websites searched 15 December 2023 to collect information on journal aims and scope reported in the text.
Administration & Society: https://journals.sagepub.com/description/AAS
American Society for Public Administration: https://journals.sagepub.com/description/ARP
Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space: https://journals.sagepub.com/description/EPC
Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14680491
International Public Management Journal: www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=upmj20
International Review of Administrative Sciences: https://journals.sagepub.com/description/RAS
Journal of Public Administration Theory and Practice: https://academic.oup.com/jpart/pages/About
Local Government Studies: www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=flgs20
Public Administration: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14679299
Public Administration and Development: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/1099162x
Public Administration Review: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/page/journal/15406210/homepage/productinformation.html
Public Management Review: www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=rpxm20
Public Money & Management: www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=rpmm20
Policy & Politics: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/17471346
Public Performance and Management Review: www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?show=aimsScope&journalCode=mpmr20
Social Policy and Administration: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/14679515
Andrews, R. & Esteve, M. (2015). Still like ships that pass in the night? The relationship between public administration and management studies. International public management journal, 18(1), 31–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, P. & McEnery, M. A. (2005). A corpus-based approach to discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in UN and newspaper texts. Journal of language and politics, 4(2), 197–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, A. (2015). Found in translation: Combining discourse analysis with computer assisted content analysis. Millennium, 43, 984–997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blei, D. M. (2012). Probabilistic topic models. Communications of the ACM, 55(4), 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blei, D. M. & Jordan, M. I. (2003, July). Modeling annotated data. In Proceedings of the 26th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval (pp. 127–134).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blei, D. M. & Lafferty, J. D. (2007). A correlated topic model of science. The annals of applied statistics, 1(1), 17–35.Google Scholar
Bohne, E., Graham, J. D. & Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2014). Public Administration and the Modern State. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Y. (2016a). Social entrepreneurship as institutional-change work: A corpus linguistics analysis. Journal of social entrepreneurship, 8(1), 14–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2016.1233133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Y. (2016b). A rhetoric-orientation view of social entrepreneurship. Social enterprise journal, 12(2), 161–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Y., Jiang, L. C. & Wang, C.-J. (2016). Mining social entrepreneurship strategies using topic modeling. PLoS One, 11(3), e0151342.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chandra, Y. & Shang, C. (2019). Qualitative Research Using R: A Systematic Approach. Singapore: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandra, Y. & Walker, R. M. (2018). How does a seminal article in public administration diffuse and influence the field? Bibliometric methods and the case of Hood’s ‘A public management for all seasons’. International public management journal, 22(5), 712–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corley, E. A. & Sabharwal, M. (2010). Scholarly collaboration and productivity patterns in public administration: Analyzing recent trends. Public administration, 88(4), 627–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, R. W. III, Buck, S. J. & Morgan, B. N. (2016). Public Administration in Theory and Practice. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Curry, D. & Van de Walle, S. (2016). A bibliometrics approach to understanding conceptual breadth, depth and development: The case of new public management. Political studies review, 26(2), 113–124.Google Scholar
De Vries, H., Bekkers, V. & Tummers, L. (2016). Innovation in the public sector: A systematic review and research agenda. Public administration, 94(1), 146–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ding, F., Lu, J. & Riccucci, N. M. (2021). How bureaucratic representation affects public organizational performance: A meta‐analysis. Public administration review, 81(6), 1003–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ennser-Jedenastik, L. & Meyer, T. M. (2018). The impact of party cues on manual coding of political texts. Political science research & methods, 6(3), 625–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and critical policy studies. Critical policy studies, 7(2), 177–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinerer, I. (2015). Introduction to the tm package text mining in R. 2013-12-01. www.dainf.ct.utfpr.edu.br/~kaestner/Mineracao/RDataMining/tm.pdf.Google Scholar
Ferlie, E., Lynn, L. E. Jr. & Pollitt, C. (2005). The Oxford Handbook of Public Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Frederickson, H. G., Smith, K. B., Larimer, C. W. & Licari, M. (2016). The Public Administration Theory Primer. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
George, B., Andersen, L. B., Hall, J. L. & Pandey, S. K. (2023). Writing impactful reviews to rejuvenate public administration: A framework and recommendations. Public administration review, 83(6), 1517–1527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, B., Pandey, S. K., Steijn, B., Decramer, A. & Audenaert, M. (2021). Red tape, organizational performance, and employee outcomes: Meta-analysis, meta-regression and research agenda. Public administration review, 81(4), 810–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, B., Walker, R. M. & Monster, J. (2019). Does strategic planning improve organizational performance? A meta‐analysis. Public administration review, 79(6), 810–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerrish, E. (2016). The impact of performance management on performance in public organizations: A meta-analysis. Public administration review, 76(1), 48–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2009). What is corpus linguistics? Language and linguistics compass, 3(5), 1225–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gries, S. T. (2016). Quantitative Corpus Linguistics with R: A Practical Introduction. London: Taylor & Francis.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grün, B. & Hornik, K. (2011). Topicmodels: An R package for fitting topic models. Journal of statistical software, 40(13), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulrajani, N. & Moloney, K. (2012). Globalizing public administration: Today’s research and tomorrow’s agenda. Public administration review, 72(1), 78–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hattke, F. & Vogel, R. (2023). Theories and theorizing in public administration: A systematic review. Public administration review, 83(6), 1542–1563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollibaugh Jr., G. E. (2019). The use of text as data methods in public administration: A review and an application to agency priorities. Journal of public administration research and theory, 29(3), 474–490.Google Scholar
Hornik, K. & Grün, B. (2011). Topicmodels: An R package for fitting topic models. Journal of statistical software, 40(13), 1–30.Google Scholar
James, O., Jilke, S. R. & Van Ryzin, G. G. (2017). Experiments in Public Management Research: Challenges and Contributions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, S. & Vakili, K. (2014). The double-edged sword of recombination in breakthrough innovation. Strategic management journal, 36(10), 1435–1457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, W. & Haans, R. F. J. (2021). Understanding the meaning of concepts across domains through collocation analysis: An application to the study of red tape. Journal of public administration research and theory, 31(1), 218–233.Google Scholar
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human communication research, 30(3), 411–433.Google Scholar
Landauer, T. K., McNamara, D. S., Dennis, S. & Kintsch, W. (Eds.) (2013). Handbook of Latent Semantic Analysis. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
L’Hôte, E. (2010). New labour and globalization: Globalist discourse with a twist? Discourse & society, 21(2), 355–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, H. & Zhang, J. (2021). Chinese public administration research in mainstream PA journals: A systematic review (2002–20). In Bryer, T. A. Ed. Handbook of Theories of Public Administration and Management, 286–298, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Li, Y., Chandra, Y. & Fan, Y. (2022). Unpacking government social media messaging strategies during the COVID‐19 pandemic in China. Policy & internet, 14(3), 651–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McEnery, T. & Hardie, A. (2012). Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meier, K. J. & O’Toole Jr., L. J. (2003a). Public management and educational performance: The impact of managerial networking. Public administration review, 63(6), 698–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, K. J. & O’Toole Jr., L. J. (2003b). Plus ca change: Public management, personnel stability, and organizational performance. Journal of public administration research and theory, 13(1), 43–64.Google Scholar
Norris, N. (1997). Error, bias and validity in qualitative research. Educational action research, 5(1), 172–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Reilly, D. & Reed, M. (2011). The grit in the oyster: Professionalism, managerialism and leaderism as discourses of UK public services modernization. Organization studies, 32(8), 1079–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pandey, S., Pandey, S. K. & Miller, L. (2017). Measuring innovativeness of public organizations: Using natural language processing techniques in computer-aided textual analysis. International public management journal, 20(1), 78–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parkinson, C. & Howorth, C. (2008). The language of social entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship & regional development, 20(3), 285–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastrana, T., Jünger, S., Ostgathe, C., Elsner, F. & Radbruch, L. (2008). A matter of definition – key elements identified in a discourse analysis of definitions of palliative care. Palliative medicine, 22(3), 222–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, M. J. & Dredze, M. (2014). Discovering health topics in social media using topic models. PLoS One, 9(8), e103408.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perren, L. & Sapsed, J. (2013). Innovation as politics: The rise and reshaping of innovation in UK parliamentary discourse 1960–2005. Research policy, 42(10), 1815–1828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, J. L. (2012). How can we improve our science to generate more usable knowledge for public professionals? Public administration review, 72(3), 479–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, B. G. & Pierre, J. (2003). Handbook of Public Administration. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, C. (2017). Public administration research since 1980: Slipping away from the real world. International journal of public sector management, 30(6/7), 555–565.Google Scholar
Pollitt, C. & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, L., Hughes, D. & Peckham, S. (2012). The discursive turn in policy analysis and the validation of policy stories. Journal of social policy, 41(2), 271–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quinn, K. M., Monroe, B. L., Colaresi, M., Crespin, M. H. & Radev, D. R. (2010). How to analyze political attention with minimal assumptions and costs. American journal of political science, 54(1), 209–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2011). Public Administration: The Interdisciplinary Study of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raadschelders, J. C. N. & Vigoda-Gadot, E. (2015). Global Dimensions of Public Administration and Governance: Comparative Perspectives. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayson, P. (2008). From key words to key semantic domains. International journal of corpus linguistics, 13(4), 519–549.Google Scholar
Rheault, L. & Cochrane, C. (2020). Word embeddings for the analysis of ideological placement in parliamentary corpora. Political analysis, 28(1), 112–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritz, A., Brewer, G. A. & Neumann, O. (2016). Public service motivation: A systematic literature review and outlook. Public administration review, 76(3), 414–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbloom, D. H., Goldman, D. D. & Wayne, S. (1993). Public Administration: Understanding Management, Politics, and Law in the Public Sector. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-Analytical Procedures for Social Science. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, M. (2008). WordSmith tools version 5. Liverpool: Lexical Analysis Software, 122.Google Scholar
Tirunillai, S. & Tellis, G. J. (2014). Mining marketing meaning from online chatter: Strategic brand analysis of big data using latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of marketing research, 51(4), 463–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van de Walle, S. & van Delft, R. (2015). Publishing in public administration: Issues with defining, comparing and ranking the output of universities. International public management journal, 18(1), 87–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, R. (2014). What happened to the public organization? A bibliometric analysis of public administration and organization studies. The American review of public administration, 44(4), 383–408.Google Scholar
Vogel, R. & Hatte, F. (2022). A century of public administration: Traveling through time and topics. Public administration, 100(1), 17–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. M. (2014a). Guest editor: Public administration in east and southeast Asia: A review of the evidence. American review of public administration, 44(2), 131–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. M. (2014b). Internal and external antecedents of process innovation in local government: A review and extension. Public management review, 16(1), 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. M. & Andrews, R. (2015). Local government management and performance: A review of evidence. Journal of public administration research and theory, 25(1), 101–133.Google Scholar
Walker, R. M., Chandra, Y., Zhang, J. & van Witteloosijin, A. (2019). Topic modeling the research-practice gap in public administration. Public administration review, 79(6), 931–937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, R. M., Zhang, J., Chandra, Y., Dong, B. & Wang, Y. (2023). Revisiting the academic-practitioner divide: Evidence from computational social sciences and corpus linguistics. Public administration review, 83(6), 1599–1617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. (2024). Does symbolic representation matter? A meta-analysis of the passive-symbolic representation link. Public administration, 83(6), 1599–1617. 10.1111/padm.12999.Google Scholar
Wu, X., He, Y.-L. & Sun, M. T.-W. (2013). Public administration research in mainland China and Taiwan: An assessment of journal publications, 1998–2008. Public administration, 91(2), 261–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Chen, W., Petrovsky, N. & Walker, R. M. (2022). The expectation-disconfirmation model and citizen satisfaction with public services: A meta-analysis and an agenda for best practice. Public administration review, 82(1), 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, J., Li, H. & Yang, K. (2022). A meta‐analysis of the government performance – trust link: Taking cultural and methodological factors into account. Public administration review, 82(1), 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 6
- Cited by