Element contents
Series: Elements in Beckett Studies
Beckett's Intermedial Ecosystems
Closed Space Environments across the Stage, Prose and Media Works
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 January 2021
Summary
This Element draws on the concept of ecosystems to investigate selected Beckett works across different media which present worlds where the human does not occupy a privileged place in the order of creation: rather Beckett's human figures are trapped in a regulated system in which they have little agency. Readers, listeners or viewers are complicit in the operation of techniques of observation inherent to the system, but also reminded of the vulnerability of those subjected to it. Beckett's work offers new paradigms and practices which reposition the human in relation to space, time and species.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Beckett StudiesOnline ISBN: 9781108938990Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 18 February 2021
Bibliography
Bibliography
Abbott, H. Porter (2002), ‘Beckett’s Lost Worlds: The Artful Exhaustion of a 19th-Century Genre’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 11:1, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Abram, David (1996), The Spell of the Sensuous: Perception and Language in a More-than-Human World, New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
Ackerley, Chris (2005), ‘Inorganic Form: Samuel Beckett’s Nature’, Journal of the Australasian Universities Language and Literature Association, 104, pp. 70–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderton, Joseph (2016), Beckett’s Creatures: Art of Failure after the Holocaust, London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arons, Wendy and May, Theresa J., eds (2012), Readings in Performance and Ecology, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Augustine of Hippo [c.390] (2004), Expositions of the Psalms 121–150, trans. Maria Boulding, New York: New City Press.Google Scholar
Balme, Christopher (2004), ‘Rethinking the Relationship between Theatre and Media’, in Balme, Christopher and Moninger, Markus (eds), Crossing Media: Theater – Film – Fotografie – Neue Medien, Munich: ePodium. https://epub.ub.uni-muenchen.de/13098/1/Balme_13098.pdf [accessed 14 April 2020].Google Scholar
Barry, Elizabeth (2016), ‘Samuel Beckett and the Contingency of Old Age’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 28:2, pp. 205–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckett, Samuel [1938] (1973), Murphy, London: Pan Books in association with Calder and Boyers.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (1976), The Beckett Trilogy: Molloy, Malone Dies, The Unnamable, London: Picador.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (1983), Disjecta: Miscellaneous Writings and a Dramatic Fragment, ed. Cohn, Ruby, London: John Calder.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (1995), The Complete Short Prose 1929–1989, ed. Gontarski, S. E., New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (1999), Beckett’s Dream Notebook, ed. Pilling, John, Reading: Beckett International Foundation.Google Scholar
Beckett, Samuel (2014), The Letters of Samuel Beckett, Vol. III: 1957–1965, ed. Craig, George, Fehsenfeld, Martha Dow, Gunn, Dan and Overbeck, Lois More, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bignell, Jonathan (2009), Beckett on Screen: The Television Plays, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Blackman, Jackie (2009), ‘Post-war Beckett: Resistance, Commitment or Communist Krap?’, in Smith, Russell (ed.), Beckett and Ethics, London: Continuum, pp. 68–85.Google Scholar
Boxall, Peter (1998), ‘Freedom and Cultural Location in Eleutheria’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 7, pp. 245–59.Google Scholar
Brater, Enoch (1974), ‘The Empty Can: Samuel Beckett and Andy Warhol’, Journal of Modern Literature, 3:5, pp. 1255–64.Google Scholar
Brater, Enoch (1987), Beyond Minimalism: Beckett’s Late Style in the Theater, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brater, Enoch (2011), Ten Ways of Thinking about Beckett: The Falsetto of Reason, London: Methuen Drama.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bryden, Mary (1994), ‘Quad: Dancing Genders’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 4, pp. 109–22.Google Scholar
Caselli, Daniela (2005), Beckett’s Dantes: Intertextuality in the Fiction and Criticism, Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Chan, Paul (2010), Waiting for Godot in New Orleans: A Field Guide, New York: Creative Time.Google Scholar
Chapple, Freda and Kattenbelt, Chiel, eds (2006), Intermediality in Theatre and Performance, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Cohn, Ruby (1967), ‘“Theatrum Mundi” and Contemporary Theatre’, Comparative Drama, 1:1, pp. 28–35.Google Scholar
Cohn, Ruby (1980), Just Play: Beckett’s Theater, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleridge, Samuel Taylor [1817] (2014), Biographia Literaria, ed. Roberts, Adam, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Connor, Steven (1992), ‘Between Theatre and Theory: “Long Observation of the Ray”’, in Pilling, John and Bryden, Mary (eds), The Ideal Core of the Onion: Reading Beckett Archives, Reading: Beckett International Foundation, pp. 79–98.Google Scholar
Connor, Steven (2003), ‘Beckett’s Atmospheres’, a paper given at the ‘After Beckett / Après Beckett’ conference in Sydney (January). http://stevenconnor.com/atmospheres-2.html [accessed 11 March 2018].Google Scholar
Connor, Steven (2006), ‘Beckett and the World’, Global Beckett Conference, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (26 October). http://stevenconnor.com/beckettworld.html [accessed 31 March 2020].Google Scholar
Connor, Steven (2014), Beckett, Modernism and the Material Imagination, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cordingley, Anthony (2018), Samuel Beckett’s How It Is: Philosophy in Translation, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Crary, Jonathan (1990), Techniques of the Observer: On Vision and Modernity in the Nineteenth Century, Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crutzen, Paul J. (2002), ‘Geology of Mankind’, Nature, 415:23. www.nature.com/articles/415023a [accessed 23 April 2020].Google Scholar
Curtius, Ernst Robert (1953), European Literature and the Latin Middle Ages, trans Willard R. Trask, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dante, Alighieri [1302–29] (2011), The Divine Comedy, Volume III: Paradiso, trans. Robert M. Durling, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Paul (2006), ‘Strange Weather: Beckett from the Perspective of Ecocriticism’, in Gontarski, Stanley E. and Uhlmann, Anthony (eds), Beckett after Beckett, Gainesville: University of Florida Press, pp. 66–78.Google Scholar
Davis, Heather and Todd, Zoe (2017), ‘On the Importance of a Date, Or, Decolonizing the Anthropocene’, ACME: An International Journal for Critical Geographies, 16:4, pp. 761–80.Google Scholar
Davis, Heather and Turpin, Etienne, eds (2015), Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments and Epistemologies, London: Open Humanities Press.Google Scholar
Dennis, Amanda (2018), ‘Compulsive Bodies, Creative Bodies: Beckett and Agency in the 21st Century’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 27:1, pp. 5–21.Google Scholar
Dennis, Amanda (2020), ‘Introduction: Samuel Beckett and the Nonhuman’, in Dennis, Amanda, Thoelen, Thomas, Atkinson, Douglas and Houppermans, Sjef (eds), Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 30:2. Special Issue: Samuel Beckett and the Nonhuman, pp. 151–60.Google Scholar
Descartes, René [1637] (2006), A Discourse on the Method of Correctly Conducting One’s Reason and Seeking Truth in the Sciences, trans. Ian MacLean, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Doane, Mary Ann (2003), ‘The Close-Up: Scale and Detail in the Cinema’, differences: A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 14:3, pp. 89–111.Google Scholar
Dowd, Garin (2007), Abstract Machines: Samuel Beckett and Philosophy after Deleuze and Guattari, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Fay, Jennifer (2018), Inhospitable World: Cinema in the Time of the Anthropocene, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fehsenfeld, Martha (1986), ‘“Everything Out but the Faces”: Beckett’s Reshaping of What Where for Television’, Modern Drama, 29:2, pp. 229–40.Google Scholar
Foster, David (2012), ‘Spatial Aesthetics in the Film Adaptation of Samuel Beckett’s Comédie’, Screen, 53:2, pp. 105–17.Google Scholar
Fraser, Graham (1995), ‘The Pornographic Imagination in “All Strange Away”’, Modern Fiction Studies, 41:3, pp. 515–30.Google Scholar
Fraser, Graham (2009), ‘The Calligraphy of Desire: Barthes, Sade, and Beckett’s How It Is’, Twentieth Century Literature, 55:1, pp. 58–79.Google Scholar
Frost, Everett (1997) ‘A “Fresh Go” for the Skull: Directing All That Fall, Samuel Beckett’s Play for Radio’, in Oppenheim, Lois (ed.), Beckett Directing Beckett, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 186–219.Google Scholar
Garrard, Greg (2012b), ‘Endgame: Beckett’s Ecological Thought’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 23, pp. 383–97.Google Scholar
Germoni, Karine (2007) ‘The Theatre of Le Dépeupleur’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 18, pp. 297–311.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S. E. (1985), The Intent of Undoing in Samuel Beckett’s Dramatic Texts, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S. E., ed. (1992), The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: Endgame, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Gontarski, S. E. (2017), Beckett Matters: Essays on Beckett’s Late Modernism, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Guattari, Felix (2000), The Three Ecologies, trans. Ian Pindar and Paul Sutton, London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Geoff (2002), ‘Life Goes On: Endgame As Anti-Pastoral Elegy’, Modern Drama, 45:4, pp. 611–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haraway, Donna (2015), ‘Donna Haraway in Conversation with Martha Kenney’, in Davis, Heather and Turpin, Etienne (eds), Art in the Anthropocene: Encounters among Aesthetics, Politics, Environments and Epistemologies, London: Open Humanities Press, pp. 255–70.Google Scholar
Harries, Martin (2014), ‘The End of a Trope for the World’, in Quiring, Björn (ed.), If Then the World a Theatre Present: Revisions of the Theatrum Mundi Metaphor in Early Modern England, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 221–39.Google Scholar
Harvey, Lawrence (1970), Samuel Beckett: Poet and Critic, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haverkamp, Anselm (2014), ‘A Narrow Thing within One Word: The Foreclosure of Nature in Post-Shakespearean Worlds’, in Quiring, Björn (ed.), If Then the World a Theatre Present: Revisions of the Theatrum Mundi Metaphor in Early Modern England, Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 133–51.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin (1977), The Question Concerning Technology and Other Essays, trans. W. Lovitt, New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Herren, Graley (2007), Samuel Beckett’s Plays on Film and Television, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Herren, Graley (2009), ‘Different Music: Karmitz and Beckett’s Film Adaptation of Comédie’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 18:1–2, pp. 10–31.Google Scholar
Jones, David Houston (2008), ‘“So Fluctuant a Death”: Entropy and Survival in The Lost Ones and Long Observation of the Ray’, in Smith, Russell (ed.), Beckett and Ethics, London: Continuum, pp. 118–33.Google Scholar
Judovitz, Dalia (2001), The Culture of the Body: Genealogies of Modernity, Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.Google Scholar
Katz, Daniel (2009), ‘What Remains of Beckett: Evasion and History’, in Maude, Ulrika and Feldman, Mathew (eds), Beckett and Phenomenology, London: Continuum, pp. 144–57.Google Scholar
Kelleher, Joe (2015), ‘Recycling Beckett’, in Finburgh, Clair and Lavery, Carl (eds), Rethinking the Theatre of the Absurd: Ecology, the Environment and the Greening of the Modern Stage, London: Bloomsbury, pp. 127–46.Google Scholar
Kershaw, Baz (2007), Theatre Ecology: Environments and Performance Events, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kiryushina, Galina, Adar, Einat and Nixon, Mark, eds (2021), Beckett and Technology, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James (1986), ‘Ghost Trio / Geister Trio’, in Brater, Enoch (ed.), Beckett at 80 / Beckett in Context, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 193–207.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James (1996), Damned to Fame: The Life of Samuel Beckett, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James and Haynes, John (2003), Images of Beckett, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James and McMillan, Dougald, eds (1993), The Theatrical Notebooks of Samuel Beckett: Waiting for Godot, London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Knowlson, James and Pilling, John (1979), Frescoes of the Skull: The Later Prose and Drama of Samuel Beckett, London: Calder.Google Scholar
Köhler, Wolfgang [1917] (1927), The Mentality of Apes, trans. Ella Winter, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Annette (1985), The Power of the Image: Essays on Representation and Sexuality, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kurman, George (1975), ‘Entropy and the “Death” of Tragedy: Notes for a Theory of Drama’, Comparative Drama, 9:4, pp. 282–304.Google Scholar
Lamartine, Alphonse de (2005), Méditations poétiques, Chalon-sur-Seône: Éditions Ligaran.Google Scholar
Lavery, Carl (2018a), ‘Ecology in Beckett’s Theatre Garden: Ways to Cultivate the Oikos’, Contemporary Theatre Review, 28:1, pp. 10–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavery, Carl, ed. (2018b), Performance and Ecology: What Can Theatre Do? London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lavery, Carl and Finburgh, Clare, eds (2015), Rethinking the Theatre of the Absurd: Ecology, the Environment and the Greening of the Modern Stage, London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.Google Scholar
Laws, Catherine (2013), Headaches among the Overtones: Music in Beckett / Beckett in Music, Amsterdam: Rodopi.Google Scholar
Laws, Catherine (2017), ‘Imagining Radio Sound: Interference and Collaboration in the BBC Radio Production of Beckett’s All That Fall’, in Addyman, David, Feldman, Matthew and Tonning, Erik (eds), Samuel Beckett and BBC Radio: A Reassessment, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 103–38.Google Scholar
Levin, David Michael, ed. (1993), Modernity and the Hegemony of Vision, Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Jim (1986), ‘Beckett et la caméra’, Revue d’Esthétique, numéro spécial hors série, pp. 371–9.Google Scholar
Little, James (2020), Samuel Beckett in Confinement: The Politics of Closed Space, London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Lyons, Charles (1964), ‘Beckett’s Endgame: An Anti-myth of Creation’, Modern Drama, 7:2, pp. 204–9.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François (1993), ‘Oikos’, in Political Writings, trans. Bill Readings and Kevin Paul Geiman, London: University College London Press, pp. 96–107.Google Scholar
Maier, Michael (2001), ‘Geistertrio: Beethoven’s Music in Samuel Beckett’s Ghost Trio’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 11, pp. 267–78.Google Scholar
Maier, Michael (2002), ‘Geistertrio: Beethoven’s Music in Samuel Beckett’s Ghost Trio (Part 2)’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 12, pp. 313–20.Google Scholar
Marranca, Bonnie (1996), Ecologies of Theatre: Essays at the Century Turning, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Maude, Ulrika (2013), ‘Pavlov’s Dog and Other Animals’, in Bryden, Mary (ed.), Beckett and Animals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 82–93.Google Scholar
McMillan, Dougald and Fehsenfeld, Martha (1988), Beckett in the Theatre, London: Calder and Riverrun.Google Scholar
McMullan, Anna (2010), Performing Embodiment in Samuel Beckett’s Drama, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McMullan, Anna (2018), ‘Interview with Katie Mitchell’, Contemporary Theatre Review, special issue on Staging Beckett and Contemporary Theatre and Performance Cultures, 28:1, pp. 127–32.Google Scholar
McMullan, Anna (2021), ‘Technology and the Voices of the More Than Human in Beckett’s All That Fall’, in Johnson, Nicholas, Tanaka, Mariko and de Vos, Laurens (eds), Beckett’s Voices / Voicing Beckett, Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
McTighe, Trish (2013), The Haptic Aesthetic in Samuel Beckett’s Drama, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McTighe, Trish, Morin, Emilie and Nixon, Mark, eds (2020), Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui 30:1. Special Issue: Beckett and Intermediality.Google Scholar
Milutis, Joe (1996), ‘Radiophonic Ontologies and the Avant-Garde’, Tulane Drama Review, 40:3, pp. 63–79.Google Scholar
Moody, Alys (2017), ‘A Machine for Feeling: Ping’s Posthuman Affect’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 26:1, pp. 87–102.Google Scholar
Morin, Emilie (2014), ‘Beckett’s Speaking Machines: Sound, Radiophonics and Acousmatics’, Modernism/modernity, 21:1, pp. 1–24.Google Scholar
Morin, Emilie (2017), Beckett’s Political Imagination, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy (2007), Ecology without Nature: Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy (2010), The Ecological Thought, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy (2013), Hyperobjects: Philosophy and Ecology after the End of the World, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Morton, Timothy (2014), ‘How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Term Anthropocene’, Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Enquiry, 1:2, pp. 257–64.Google Scholar
Murphy, Paul (1982), ‘The Nature of Allegory in “The Lost Ones”, or The Quincunx Realistically Considered’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 7, pp. 71–88.Google Scholar
Nixon, Mark (2009), ‘Samuel Beckett’s “Film-Vidéo-Cassette projet”’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 18:1–2, pp. 32–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nixon, Mark (2014), ‘Beckett’s Unpublished Canon’, in Gontarski, S. E. (ed.), Samuel Beckett and the Arts, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, pp. 282–305.Google Scholar
O’Hara, Dan (2010), ‘The Metronome of Consciousness’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 22, pp. 435–47.Google Scholar
Pattie, David (2018), ‘“At Me Too Someone Is Looking”: Coercive Systems in Beckett’s Theatre’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 30:2, pp. 227–38.Google Scholar
Pethö, Ágnes (2011), Cinema and Intermediality: The Passion for the In-Between, Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Piette, Adam (2011), ‘Beckett, Affect and the Face’, Textual Practice, 25:2, pp. 281–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Praz, Mario [1930] (1954), The Romantic Agony, trans. Angus Davidson, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Quiring, Björn, ed. (2014), If Then the World a Theatre Present: Revisions of the Theatrum Mundi Metaphor in Early Modern England, Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabaté, Jean-Michel (2016), Think, Pig! Beckett at the Limit of the Human, New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Rabaté, Jean-Michel (2020), ‘Beckett’s Sade / Barthes’ Zade’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 32:2, pp. 272–88.Google Scholar
Rada, Michelle (2018), ‘Boring Holes: The Crystalline Body of Beckett’s The Lost Ones’, Journal of Beckett Studies, 27:1, pp. 22–39.Google Scholar
Caroline, Schaumann and Sullivan, Heather I., eds (2017), German Ecocriticism in the Anthropocene, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Schneider, Alan (1995), ‘On Directing Beckett’s Film’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 4, pp. 29–40.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William (1986), William Shakespeare: The Complete Works, ed. Wells, Stanley and Taylor, Gary, Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Siess, Jürgen (2003), ‘The Actor’s Body and Institutional Tensions: From Act Without Words I to Not I’, Assaph, 17–18, pp. 297–307.Google Scholar
Stengers, Isabelle in conversation with Davis, Heather and Turpin, Etienne (2014), ‘Matters of Cosmopolitics: On the Provocations of Gaïa’, in Turpin, Etienne (ed.), Architecture in the Anthropocene: Encounters among Design, Deep Time, Science and Philosophy, Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press, pp. 171–82.Google Scholar
Tajiri, Yoshiki (2013), ‘Beckett Coetzee and Animals’ in Bryden, Mary (ed.), Beckett and Animals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 27–39.Google Scholar
Tansley, Arthur George (1935), ‘The Use and Abuse of Vegetational Concepts and Terms’, Ecology, 16:3, pp. 284–307.Google Scholar
Tillyard, Eustace Mandeville Wetenhall (1943), The Elizabethan World Picture, London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Tonning, Erik (2007), Samuel Beckett’s Abstract Drama: Works for Stage and Screen 1962–85, Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Tucker, David (2015), ‘“Beckett’s Guignol Worlds”: Arnold Geulincx and Heinrich von Kleist’, in Feldman, Matthew and Mamdani, Karim (eds), Beckett / Philosophy, Stuttgart: ibidem, pp. 235–60.Google Scholar
Van Hulle, Dirk and Nixon, Mark (2007), Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 18, Special Issue: Beckett and Romanticism.Google Scholar
Van Hulle, Dirk and Weller, Shane (2018), The Making of Samuel Beckett’s Fin de partie / Endgame. The Beckett Digital Manuscript Project 07. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Verhulst, Pim (2015), ‘Just Howls from Time to Time: Dating Pochade radiophonique’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 27, pp. 147–62.Google Scholar
Wallace-Wells, David (2019), The Uninhabitable Earth: A Story of the Future, London: Allen Lane (Penguin Random House).Google Scholar
Weathers, Kathleen C., Strayer, David L. and Likens, Gene E., eds (2013), Fundamentals of Ecosystem Science, San Diego, CA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Weber-Caflisch, Antoinette (1994), Chacun son dépeupleur: sur Samuel Beckett, Paris: Éditions de Minuit.Google Scholar
Weller, Shane (2006), Beckett, Literature and the Ethics of Alterity, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Weller, Shane (2008), ‘Not Rightly Human: Beckett and Animality’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 19:1, pp. 211–21.Google Scholar
Weller, Shane (2009), ‘An Anethics of Desire: Beckett, Racine, Sade’, in Smith, Russell (ed.), Beckett and Ethics, London: Continuum, pp. 102–17.Google Scholar
Weller, Shane (2013), ‘Forms of Weakness: Animalisation in Kafka and Beckett’, in Bryden, Mary (ed.), Beckett and Animals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 13–26.Google Scholar
White, Harry (1998), ‘“Something Is Taking Its Course”: Dramatic Exactitude and the Paradigm of Serialism in Samuel Beckett’, in Bryden, Mary (ed.), Samuel Beckett and Music, Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 159–71.Google Scholar
Zalasiewicz, Jan, Waters, Colin N., Summerhayes, Colin P. et al. (2017), ‘The Working Group on the Anthropocene: Summary of Evidence and Interim Recommendations’, Anthropocene, 19, pp. 55–60.Google Scholar
Zilliacus, Clas (1976), Beckett and Broadcasting: A Study of the Works of Samuel Beckett for and in Radio and Television, Abo: Abo Akademi.Google Scholar
Zinman, Toby (1995), ‘Eh Joe and the Peephole Aesthetic’, Samuel Beckett Today / Aujourd’hui, 4, pp. 53–64.Google Scholar
Film, film, by Samuel Beckett, directed by Alan Schneider. Evergreen, 1964.Google Scholar
NotFilm, kino-film, directed by Ross Lipmann. Milestone Films in collaboration with Corpus Fluxus, 2016.Google Scholar
Film, film, by Samuel Beckett, directed by Alan Schneider. Evergreen, 1964.Google Scholar
NotFilm, kino-film, directed by Ross Lipmann. Milestone Films in collaboration with Corpus Fluxus, 2016.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 23
- Cited by