Element contents
Behavioral Insights for Public Policy
Contextualizing our Science
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 April 2022
Summary
There has been an increasing effort to integrate behavioral insights into public policy. These insights are often reliant on social psychological research and theory. However, in this relatively young field, policy interventions and behavioral insights are often built on laboratory-based psychological research with effects that can prove to be unstable in the 'real world'. In this Element, the author provides a brief history of how behavioral insights have been applied to complex policy problems. The author describes ways in which behavioral insights have been successful and where they have fallen short. In addition, the author examines unintended negative consequences of nudges and provides a more nuanced examination of their impacts on behavior change. Finally, the author concludes with a set of recommendations for generating more effective practical applications of psychology to the field of public policy.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009028806Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 28 April 2022
References
Abrahamse, W., & Steg, L. (2013). Social influence approaches to encourage resource conservation: A meta-analysis. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1773–1785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.029Google Scholar
Allcott, H. (2011). Social norms and energy conservation. Journal of Public Economics, 95(9), 1082–1095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2011.03.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allcott, H. (2016). Paternalism and energy efficiency: An overview. Annual Review of Economics, 8(1),145–176. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080315-015255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allcott, H., & Kessler, J. B. (2019). The welfare effects of nudges: A case study of energy use social comparisons. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 11(1), 236–276. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.20170328Google Scholar
Allcott, H., & Mullainathan, S. (2010). Behavior and energy policy. Science, 327(5970), 1204–1205. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180775CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allcott, H., & Rogers, T. (2014). The short-run and long-run effects of behavioral interventions: Experimental evidence from energy conservation. American Economic Review, 104(10), 3003–3037. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.10.3003Google Scholar
Angawi, A. F., & Hasanain, W. A. (2018). The nuts and bolts of behavioral insights units. In A. Samson, ed., The Behavioral Economics Guide 2018 (pp. 24–35). Behavioral Science Solutions. www.behavioraleconomics.com/be-guide/the-behavioral-economics-guide-2018/Google Scholar
APA (American Psychological Association). (2017). Multicultural Guidelines: An Ecological Approach to Context, Identity, and Intersectionality, 2017. www.apa.org/about/policy/multicultural-guidelinesGoogle Scholar
APA (American Psychological Association). (2019a). APA Guidelines on Race and Ethnicity in Psychology. www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-race-ethnicity.pdfGoogle Scholar
APA (American Psychological Association). (2019b). APA Guidelines for Psychological Practice for People with Low-Income and Economic Marginalization. www.apa.org/about/policy/guidelines-low-income.pdfGoogle Scholar
Arnett, J. J. (2008). The neglected 95%: Why American psychology needs to become less American. American Psychologist, 63(7), 602–614. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.7.602CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arno, A., & Thomas, S. (2016). The efficacy of nudge theory strategies in influencing adult dietary behaviour: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 16(676). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-3272-xGoogle Scholar
Auferoth, F. (2020). Who benefits from nudges for exam preparation? An experiment. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3424583. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3424583Google Scholar
Axt, J. R. (2018). The best way to measure explicit racial attitudes is to ask about them. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 9(8), 896–906. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617728995CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benartzi, S., Beshears, J., Milkman, K. L. et al. (2017). Should governments invest more in nudging? Psychological Science, 28(8), 1041–1055. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617702501Google Scholar
Beshears, J., Choi, J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B., & Weller, B. (2010). Public policy and saving for retirement: The “autosave” features of the Pension Protection Act of 2006. In Siegfried, J. J., ed., Better Living through Economics (pp. 274–290). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bos, A. E. R., Pryor, J. B., Reeder, G. D., & Stutterheim, S. E. (2013). Stigma: Advances in theory and research. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2012.746147Google Scholar
Brady, L. M., Fryberg, S. A., & Shoda, Y. (2018). Expanding the interpretive power of psychological science by attending to culture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(45), 11406–11413. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1803526115Google Scholar
Broers, V. J. V., De Breucker, C., Van den Broucke, S., & Luminet, O. (2017). A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effectiveness of nudging to increase fruit and vegetable choice. European Journal of Public Health, 27(5), 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckx085Google Scholar
Byerly, H., Balmford, A., Ferraro, P. J. et al. (2018). Nudging pro-environmental behavior: Evidence and opportunities. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(3), 159–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1777CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cadario, R., & Chandon, P. (2019). Which healthy eating nudges work best? A meta-analysis of field experiments. Marketing Science, 39(3), 465–486. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.2018.1128Google Scholar
Camerer, C. F. (1998). Prospect Theory in the Wild: Evidence from the Field. Report No. 1037. California Institute of Technology. https://resolver.caltech.edu/CaltechAUTHORS:20170811-150835361Google Scholar
Ceci, S. J., Kahan, D. M., & Braman, D. (2010). The WEIRD are even weirder than you think: Diversifying contexts is as important as diversifying samples. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 87–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X10000063CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chou, E. Y., Parmar, B. L., & Galinsky, A. D. (2016). Economic insecurity increases physical pain. Psychological Science, 27(4), 443–454. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797615625640CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cialdini, R. B. (2009). We have to break up. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01091.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cialdini, R. B. (2018). Why the world is turning to behavioral science. In Samson, A., ed., The Behavioral Economics Guide 2018 (pp. 77–14). Behavioral Science Solutions. www.behavioraleconomics.com/be-guide/the-behavioral-economics-guide-2018/Google Scholar
Clark, W. A. V., & Lisowski, W. (2017). Prospect theory and the decision to move or stay. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(36), E7432–E7440. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1708505114Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Congdon, W. J., & Shankar, M. (2015). The White House Social & Behavioral Sciences Team: Lessons learned from year one. Behavioral Science & Policy, 1(2), 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1353/bsp.2015.0010Google Scholar
Corrigan, P. W., & Lam, C. (2007). Challenging the structural discrimination of psychiatric disabilities: Lessons learned from the American disability community. Rehabilitation Education, 21(1), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1891/088970107805059869Google Scholar
Cortland, C. I., Shapiro, J. R., Guzman, I. Y., & Ray, L. A. (2019). The ironic effects of stigmatizing smoking: Combining stereotype threat theory with behavioral pharmacology. Addiction, 114(10), 1842–1848. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14696Google Scholar
Dede, O. Ç. (2019). Behavioral policies and inequities: The case of incentivized smoking cessation policies. Journal of Economic Methodology, 26(3), 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2019.1625223Google Scholar
DeJesus, J. M., Callanan, M. A., Solis, G., & Gelman, S. A. (2019). Generic language in scientific communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(37), 18370–18377. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1817706116Google Scholar
DellaVigna, S., & Linos, E. (2022). RCTs to scale: Comprehensive evidence from two nudge units. Econometrica, 90(1), 81–116.Google Scholar
Dobbin, F., & Kalev, A. (2016). Why diversity programs fail. Harvard Business Review, July 1. https://hbr.org/2016/07/why-diversity-programs-failGoogle Scholar
Dupree, C. H., & Kraus, M. W. (2022). Psychological science is not race neutral. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 270–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620979820Google Scholar
Emmons, D. L., Mazzuchi, T. A., Sarkani, S., & Larsen, C. E. (2018). Mitigating cognitive biases in risk identification: Practitioner checklist for the aerospace sector. Defense Acquisition Research Journal, 25(1), 52–93. https://doi.org/10.22594/dau.16-770.25.01Google Scholar
Esmark, A. (2019). Communicative governance at work: How choice architects nudge citizens towards health, wealth and happiness in the information age. Public Management Review, 21(1), 138–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1473476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewert, B. (2020). Moving beyond the obsession with nudging individual behaviour: Towards a broader understanding of Behavioural Public Policy. Public Policy and Administration, 35(3), 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076719889090Google Scholar
Eyal, N. (2014). Nudge, embarrassment, and restriction: Replies to Voigt, Tieffenbach, and Saghai. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 4(1), 53–54. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2015.01Google Scholar
Fine, B., Johnston, D., Santos, A. C., & Waeyenberge, E. V. (2016). Nudging or fudging: The World Development Report 2015. Development and Change, 47(4), 640–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12240Google Scholar
Fong, G. T., Hammond, D., & Hitchman, S. C. (2009). The impact of pictures on the effectiveness of tobacco warnings. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 87, 640–643. www.who.int/bulletin/volumes/87/8/09-069575/en/CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frey, E., & Rogers, T. (2014). Persistence: How treatment effects persist after interventions stop. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732214550405Google Scholar
Ghesla, C., Grieder, M., & Schubert, R. (2020). Nudging the poor and the rich: A field study on the distributional effects of green electricity defaults. Energy Economics, 86(C). https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/eneeco/v86y2020ics014098831930413x.htmlCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gigerenzer, G. (2015). On the supposed evidence for libertarian paternalism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 361–383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0248-1Google Scholar
Glaeser, E. L. (2005). Paternalism and psychology. Working Paper No. w11789. National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w11789CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, R. V. (1976). Even the Rat Was White: A Historical View of Psychology. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Haeffel, G. J., & Howard, G. S. (2010). Self-report: Psychology’s four-letter word. The American Journal of Psychology, 123(2), 181–188. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.123.2.0181Google Scholar
Hagman, W., Andersson, D., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2015). Public views on policies involving nudges. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 439–453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0263-2Google Scholar
Hagmann, D., Ho, E. H., & Loewenstein, G. (2019). Nudging out support for a carbon tax. Nature Climate Change, 9(6), 484–489. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-019-0474-0Google Scholar
Hall, C. C., Zhao, J., & Shafir, E. (2014). Self-affirmation among the poor: Cognitive and behavioral implications. Psychological Science, 25(2), 619–625. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613510949Google Scholar
Hansen, P. G. (2016). The definition of nudge and libertarian paternalism: Does the hand fit the glove? European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7(1), 155–174. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1867299X00005468Google Scholar
Harmeling, C. M., Mende, M., Scott, M. L., & Palmatier, R. W. (2021). Marketing, through the eyes of the stigmatized. Journal of Marketing Research, 58(2), 223–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022243720975400Google Scholar
Hartmann, W. E., Kim, E. S., Kim, J. H. J. et al. (2013). In search of cultural diversity, revisited: Recent publication trends in cross-cultural and ethnic minority psychology. Review of General Psychology, 17(3), 243–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032260Google Scholar
Hatzenbuehler, M. L., & Link, B. G. (2014). Introduction to the special issue on structural stigma and health. Social Science & Medicine, 103, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2013.12.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hauser, O. P., Gino, F., & Norton, M. I. (2018). Budging beliefs, nudging behaviour. Mind & Society, 17(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-019-00200-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hausman, D., & Welch, B. (2010). Debate: To nudge or not to nudge. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00351.xGoogle Scholar
Hebda, C., & Wagner, J. (2016). Nudging healthy food consumption and sustainability in food deserts. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 9(1), 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12076-015-0138-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helweg-Larsen, M., Sorgen, L. J., & Pisinger, C. (2019). Does it help smokers if we stigmatize them? A test of the stigma-induced identity threat model among U.S. and Danish smokers. Social Cognition, 37(3), 294–313. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2019.37.3.294Google Scholar
Hemphill, J. F. (2003). Interpreting the magnitude of correlation coefficients. American Psychologist, 58(1), 78–79.Google Scholar
Henrich, J. (2015). Culture and social behavior. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 3, 84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.02.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83; discussion 83–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152XGoogle Scholar
Hornsey, M. J., Harris, E. A., & Fielding, K. S. (2018). Relationships among conspiratorial beliefs, conservatism and climate scepticism across nations. Nature Climate Change, 8(7), 614–620. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0157-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hummel, D., & Maedche, A. (2019). How effective is nudging? A quantitative review on the effect sizes and limits of empirical nudging studies. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 80, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.03.005Google Scholar
John, P. (2014). Policy entrepreneurship in UK central government: The behavioural insights team and the use of randomized controlled trials. Public Policy and Administration, 29(3), 257–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076713509297Google Scholar
John, P., Smith, G., & Stoker, G. (2009). Nudge nudge, think think: Two strategies for changing civic behaviour. The Political Quarterly, 80(3), 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-923X.2009.02001.xGoogle Scholar
Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? Science, 302(5649), 1338–1340.Google Scholar
Jung, J. Y., & Mellers, B. A. (2016). American attitudes toward nudges. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), 13.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185Google Scholar
Kalev, A., Dobbin, F., & Kelly, E. (2006). Best practices or best guesses? Assessing the efficacy of corporate affirmative action and diversity policies. American Sociological Review, 71(4), 589–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240607100404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, S. (2018). The nation that thrived by “nudging” its population. BBC, February 20. www.bbc.com/future/article/20180220-the-nation-that-thrived-by-nudging-its-populationGoogle Scholar
Kirakozian, A. (2016). One without the other? Behavioural and incentive policies for household waste management. Journal of Economic Surveys, 30(3), 526–551. https://doi.org/10.1111/joes.12159Google Scholar
Krendl, A. C., & Pescosolido, B. A. (2020). Countries and cultural differences in the stigma of mental illness: The East–West divide. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 51(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022119901297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, D. E., Riis, J., Sonnenberg, L. M., Barraclough, S. J., & Thorndike, A. N. (2012). Food choices of minority and low-income employees: A cafeteria intervention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(3), 240–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.05.004Google Scholar
Lewis, M. (2016). The Undoing Project: A Friendship That Changed Our Minds (illustrated ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2006). “We can do this the easy way or the hard way”: Negative emotions, self-regulation, and the law. The University of Chicago Law Review, 73(1), 183–206.Google Scholar
Madrian, B. C., & Shea, D. F. (2001). The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1149–1187. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265543Google Scholar
Major, B., Hunger, J. M., Bunyan, D. P., & Miller, C. T. (2014). The ironic effects of weight stigma. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2013.11.009Google Scholar
Mani, A., Mullainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013). Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science, 341(6149), 976–980. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1238041CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marchiori, D. R., Adriaanse, M. A., & De Ridder, D. T. D. (2017). Unresolved questions in nudging research: Putting the psychology back in nudging. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 11(1), e12297. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224Google Scholar
McKenzie, C. R. M., Liersch, M. J., & Finkelstein, S. R. (2006). Recommendations implicit in policy defaults. Psychological Science, 17(5), 414–420. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01721.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milfont, T. L., & Markowitz, E. (2016). Sustainable consumer behavior: A multilevel perspective. Current Opinion in Psychology, 10, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.12.016Google Scholar
Milkman, K. L., Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., & Madrian, B. C. (2011). Using implementation intentions prompts to enhance influenza vaccination rates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(26), 10415–10420. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1103170108CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Milkman, K. L., Chugh, D., & Bazerman, M. H. (2009). How can decision making be improved? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 379–383. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01142.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mills, S. (2020). Nudge/sludge symmetry: On the relationship between nudge and sludge and the resulting ontological, normative and transparency implications. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, S. (2022). Personalized nudging. Behavioural Public Policy, 6(1), 150–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mols, F., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., & Steffens, N. K. (2015). Why a nudge is not enough: A social identity critique of governance by stealth. European Journal of Political Research, 54(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12073Google Scholar
Mrkva, K., Posner, N. A., Reeck, C., & Johnson, E. J. (2021). Do nudges reduce disparities? Choice architecture compensates for low consumer knowledge. Journal of Marketing, 0022242921993186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242921993186Google Scholar
Muthukrishna, M., Bell, A. V., Henrich, J. et al. (2020). Beyond Western, educated, industrial, rich, and democratic (WEIRD) psychology: Measuring and mapping scales of cultural and psychological distance. Psychological Science, 31(6), 678–701. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620916782CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muthukrishna, M., & Henrich, J. (2019). A problem in theory. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(3), 221–229. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0522-1Google Scholar
Nagayama Hall, G. C., & Maramba, G. G. (2001). In search of cultural diversity: Recent literature in cross-cultural and ethnic minority psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 7(1),12–26. https://doi.org/10.1037/1099-9809.7.1.12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nisbett, R. E., & Masuda, T. (2003). Culture and point of view. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(19), 11163–11170. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1934527100CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231Google Scholar
Nzinga, K., Rapp, D. N., Leatherwood, C. et al. (2018). Should social scientists be distanced from or engaged with the people they study? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(45), 11435–11441. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721167115Google Scholar
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2017). Behavioural Insights and Public Policy: Lessons from around the World. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264270480-enGoogle Scholar
OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2019). Tools and Ethics for Applied Behavioural Insights: The Basic Toolkit. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9ea76a8f-enGoogle Scholar
OES (Office of Evaluation Sciences). (2019). Using social norms to decrease energy use in public housing. OES abstract. https://oes.gsa.gov/assets/abstracts/1808%20-%20Project%20Abstract%20HUD%20Energy.pdfGoogle Scholar
Osbaldiston, R., & Schott, J. P. (2012). Environmental sustainability and behavioral science: Meta-analysis of proenvironmental behavior experiments. Environment and Behavior, 44(2), 257–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916511402673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petticrew, M., Maani, N., Pettigrew, L., Rutter, H., & Schalkwyk, M. C. V. (2020). Dark nudges and sludge in big alcohol: Behavioral economics, cognitive biases, and alcohol industry corporate social responsibility. The Milbank Quarterly, 98(4), 1290–1328. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12475Google Scholar
Rad, M. S., Martingano, A. J., & Ginges, J. (2018). Toward a psychology of Homo sapiens: Making psychological science more representative of the human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 115(45), 11401–11405. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1721165115Google Scholar
Reisch, L. A., & Sunstein, C. R. (2016). Do Europeans like nudges? SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2739118. Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2739118Google Scholar
Richard, F. D., Bond, C. F., & Stokes-Zoota, J. J. (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7(4), 331–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331Google Scholar
Richburg-Hayes, L., Anzelone, C., & Dechausay, N. (2017). Nudging change in human services: Final report of the Behavioral Interventions to Advance Self-Sufficiency (BIAS) Project. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3007745. Social Science Research Network. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3007745Google Scholar
Roberts, J. L. (2018). Nudge-proof: Distributive justice and the ethics of nudging. Michigan Law Review, 116(6), 1045.Google Scholar
Roberts, S. O., Bareket-Shavit, C., Dollins, F. A., Goldie, P. D., & Mortenson, E. (2020). Racial inequality in psychological research: Trends of the past and recommendations for the future. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 15(6), 1295–1309. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620927709Google Scholar
Rozin, P. (2001). Social psychology and science: Some lessons from Solomon Asch. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0501_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruggeri, K., Benzerga, A., Verra, S., & Folke, T. (2020). A behavioral approach to personalizing public health. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2020.31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, A. T., & Engelen, B. (2020). The ethics of nudging: An overview. Philosophy Compass, 15(4), e12658. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12658Google Scholar
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., & Griskevicius, V. (2007). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science, 18(5), 429–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01917.xGoogle Scholar
Sheeran, P., Maki, A., Montanaro, E. et al. (2016). The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 35(11), 1178–1188. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000387CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shephard, D. D., Hall, C. C., & Lamberton, C. (2020). Increasing identification of homeless students: An experimental evaluation of increased communication incorporating behavioral insights. Educational Researcher, 0013189X20981067. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20981067Google Scholar
Shih, M., & Sanchez, D. T. (2009). When race becomes even more complex: Toward understanding the landscape of multiracial identity and experiences. Journal of Social Issues, 65(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2008.01584.xGoogle Scholar
Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2011). False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant. Psychological Science, 22(11), 1359–1366. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417632Google Scholar
Simons, D. J., Shoda, Y., & Lindsay, D. S. (2017). Constraints on generality (COG): A proposed addition to all empirical papers. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12(6), 1123–1128. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691617708630Google Scholar
Stephens, N. M., Fryberg, S. A., Markus, H. R., Johnson, C. S., & Covarrubias, R. (2012). Unseen disadvantage: How American universities’ focus on independence undermines the academic performance of first-generation college students. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1178–1197. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephens, N. M., Markus, H. R., & Townsend, S. S. M. (2007). Choice as an act of meaning: The case of social class. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 814–830.Google Scholar
Sue, S. (2000). Science, ethnicity, and bias: Where have we gone wrong? The American Psychologist, 54(12), 1070–1077. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.12.1070Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Simpler: The Future of Government (reprint ed.). Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2020). Sludge audits. Behavioural Public Policy, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2019.32Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2021). Sludge: What Stops Us from Getting Things Done and What to Do about It. Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R., Reisch, L. A., & Rauber, J. (2018). A worldwide consensus on nudging? Not quite, but almost. Regulation & Governance, 12(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Syed, M., Santos, C., Yoo, H. C., & Juang, L. P. (2018). Invisibility of racial/ethnic minorities in developmental science: Implications for research and institutional practices. American Psychologist, 73(6), 812–826. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000294Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, D., Fox, C. R., & Rogers, T. (2017). On the misplaced politics of behavioural policy interventions. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(7), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (2016). Misbehaving: The Making of Behavioral Economics (reprint ed.). New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H. (2018). Nudge, not sludge. Science, 361(6401), 431. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau9241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian paternalism. Behavioral Economics, 93(2), 5.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2009). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness (rev. and extended ed.). London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Thunström, L. (2019). Welfare effects of nudges: The emotional tax of calorie menu labeling. Judgment and Decision Making, 14(1), 11–25.Google Scholar
Thunström, L., Gilbert, B., & Ritten, C. J. (2018). Nudges that hurt those already hurting: Distributional and unintended effects of salience nudges. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 153, 267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2018.07.005Google Scholar
Tieffenbach, E. (2014). On the cost of shame comment on “nudging by shaming, shaming by nudging.” International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 3(7), 409–411. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2014.125Google Scholar
Vlaev, I., King, D., Dolan, P., & Darzi, A. (2016). The theory and practice of “nudging”: Changing health behaviors. Public Administration Review, 76(4), 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12564Google Scholar
Wakefield, M. A., Hayes, L., Durkin, S., & Borland, R. (2013). Introduction effects of the Australian plain packaging policy on adult smokers: A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 3(7). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003175CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winston, A. S. (2011). Value neutrality and SPSSI: The quest for policy, purity, and legitimacy. Journal of Social Issues, 67(1), 59–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01683.xGoogle Scholar
Bank, World. (2014). World Development Report 2015: Mind, Society, and Behavior. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-0342-0Google Scholar
Wright, M. C., Borbolla, D., Waller, R. G. et al. (2019). Critical care information display approaches and design frameworks: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 100(3), 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yjbinx.2019.100041CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeung, K. (2017). “Hypernudge”: Big Data as a mode of regulation by design. Information, Communication & Society, 20(1), 118–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1186713Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 5
- Cited by