Element contents
Aboriginal Writers and Popular Fiction
The Literature of Anita Heiss
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 14 January 2021
Summary
Wiradjuri woman, Anita Heiss, is arguably one of the first Aboriginal Australian authors of popular fiction. A focus on the political characterises her chick lit; and her identity as an author is both supplemented and complemented by her roles as an academic, activist and public intellectual. Heiss has discussed genre as a means of targeting audiences that may be less engaged with Indigenous affairs, and positions her novels as educative but not didactic. Her readership is constituted by committed readers of romance and chick lit as well as politically engaged readers that are attracted to Heiss' dual authorial persona; and, both groups bring radically distinct expectations to bear on these texts. Through analysis of online reviews and surveys conducted with users of the book reviewing website Goodreads, I complicate the understanding of genre as a cogent interpretative frame, and deploy this discussion to explore the social significance of Heiss' literature.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108779579Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 11 February 2021
References
Anderson, K. (2016). Bourdieu’s distinction between rules and strategies and secondary principal practice: a review of selected literature. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 44(4), 688–705.Google Scholar
Austlit (n.d.) A primary resource for teachers and students of Australian literature, theatre, film, television, and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander studies. www.austlit.edu.au.ezp.lib.unimelb.edu.au/austlit/page/A7669?mainTabTemplate=agentWorksBy&restrictToAgent=A7669&from=0&count=10000. Accessed 20 June 2018.Google Scholar
Ball, T. (2016). Who’s afraid of the black middle class?: The socio-economic status of Aboriginals is shifting. Meanjin, 75(3), 81–6.Google Scholar
Benstock, S. (2006). ‘Afterword’, in Ferriss, S. and Mallory, Y., eds., The New Woman’s Fiction. New York: Routledge, pp. 253–6.Google Scholar
Berberich, C. (ed.) (2015). Bloomsbury Introduction to Popular Fiction. London: Wiley Online Library.Google Scholar
Berlant, L. G. (1997). The Queen of America Goes to Washington City: Essays on Sex and Citizenship. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Berlant, L. G. and Prosser, J. (2011). Life writing and intimate publics: a conversation with Lauren Berlant. Biography, 34(1), 180–7.Google Scholar
Bharti, Santosh. (2019). The new woman in Advaita Kala’s almost single. IJELLH (International Journal of English Language, Literature in Humanities), 7 (4), 872–8.Google Scholar
Bolt breached Discrimination Act, judge rules. (29 September 2011). Web. www.abc.net.au/news/2011–09-28/bolt-found-guilty-of-breaching-discrimination-act/3025918. Accessed 1 September 2018.Google Scholar
Bongie, C. (2008). Friends and Enemies: the Scribal Politics of Post/Colonial Literature. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Boschetti, A. (2006). Bourdieu’s work on literature: contexts, stakes and perspectives. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(6), 135–55.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.. (1984). Distinction: a Social Critique of Taste. Translated by Nice, Richard. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.. (1989). Social space and symbolic power. Sociological theory, 7(1), 14–25.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.. (1990). The Logic of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P.. (1998). On Television. Translated by Ferguson, Priscilla Parkhurst. London: New Press.Google Scholar
Brewster, A. (1996). Reading Aboriginal Women’s Autobiography. Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Brewster, A.. (2007). Brokering cross-racial feminism: reading Indigenous Australian Poet Lisa Bellear. Feminist Theory, 8(2), 209–21.Google Scholar
Brewster, A.. (2008). Engaging the public intimacy of whiteness: the Indigenous protest poetry of Romaine Moreton. Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature, Special Issue, The Colonial Present, 56–76.Google Scholar
Brewster, A.. (2015). Giving this Country a Memory: Contemporary Aboriginal Voices of Australia. New South Wales: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
Brewster, A.. (2016). Reading Aboriginal Women’s Life Stories. New South Wales: Sydney University Press.Google Scholar
Brouillette, S. (2016). Postcolonial authorship revisited (from postcolonial writers in the global literary marketplace). In Dalleo, R., ed., Bourdieu and Postcolonial Studies. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press, pp. 80–97.Google Scholar
Brunt, K. (2007). Anita delves right into modern dating scene. Northern Territory News, 24 June.Google Scholar
Butler, K. J. (2013). Witnessing Australian Stories: History, Testimony, and Memory in Contemporary Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, P. and Desai, J. (2008). Manolos, marriage, and mantras: chick-lit criticism and transnational feminism. Meridians, 8(2), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casanova, P. (2004). The World Republic of Letters. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. and Bryant, A. 2008. Grounded theory. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc, pp. 375–6. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909Google Scholar
Chen, E. Y. (2010). Neoliberal self-governance and popular postfeminism in contemporary Anglo-American chick lit. Concentric: Literary and cultural studies, 36, 243–75.Google Scholar
Dalleo, R., ed. (2016). Bourdieu and Postcolonial Studies. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
Driscoll, B. (2014). The New Literary Middlebrow: Tastemakers and Reading in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Driscoll, B.. (2016). Readers of popular fiction and emotion online. In Gelder, K., ed., New Directions in Popular Fiction. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.. 425–49.Google Scholar
Farr, C. K. (2009). It was chick lit all along: the gendering of a genre. In Goren, L., ed., You’ve Come a Long Way, Baby: Women, Politics, and Popular Culture. University Press of Kentucky, pp. 201–14.Google Scholar
Fasselt, R. (2019). Crossing genre boundaries: HJ Golakai’s Afropolitan chick-lit mysteries. Feminist Theory, 20(2), 185–200.Google Scholar
Ferriss, S. and Young, M. (2006). Chicks, girls and choice: redefining feminism. Junctures: The Journal for Thematic Dialogue, 6, 87–97.Google Scholar
Ferriss, S. and Young, M.. (2006). Chick Lit: the New Woman’s Fiction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fforde, C., Bamblett, L., Lovett, R., Gorringe, S. and Fogarty, B. (2013). Discourse, deficit and identity: Aboriginality, the race paradigm and the language of representation in contemporary Australia. Media International Australia, 149, 162–73.Google Scholar
Fish, S. E. (1980). Is There a Text in this Class?: the Authority of Interpretive Communities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Foasberg, N. M. (2012). Online reading communities: from book clubs to book blogs. The Journal of Social Media in Society, 1(1), 30–53.Google Scholar
Fowler, B. (1991). The Alienated Reader: Women and Romantic Literature in the Twentieth Century. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Fuller, D. and Rehberg Sedo, D. (2013). Reading Beyond the Book: The Social Practices of Contemporary Literary Culture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gehrmann, S. (2019). Emerging Afro-Parisian ‘chick-lit’ by Lauren Ekué and Léonora Miano. Feminist Theory, 20(2), 215–28.Google Scholar
Gelder, K. (2004). Popular Fiction: the Logics and Practices of a Literary Field. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Genette, G. and Maclean, M. (1991). Introduction to the paratext. New Literary History, 22(2), 261–72.Google Scholar
Gill, R. and Herdieckerhoff, E. (2006). Rewriting the romance: new femininities in chick lit? Feminist Media Studies, 6(4), 487–504.Google Scholar
Gill, R. and Scharff, C. (eds.) (2013). New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Guerrero, L. A. (2006). ‘Sistahs are doin’ it for themselves’: chick lit in black and white. In Ferriss, S. and Young, M., eds., Chick Lit: the New Women’s Fiction. New York: Routledge, pp. 87–101.Google Scholar
Harzewski, S. (2006). Tradition and displacement in the new novel of manners. In Ferriss, S. and Young, M., eds., Chick Lit: the New Woman’s Fiction. New York: Routledge, pp. 29–46.Google Scholar
Harzewski, S.. (2011). Chick Lit and Postfeminism. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.Google Scholar
Heiss, Anita. (2001). Who am I? The Diary of Mary Talence. Sydney, 1937. NSW: Scholastic.Google Scholar
Heiss, Anita. (2003). Dhuuluu-Yala: To Talk Straight – Publishing Indigenous Literature. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Heiss, Anita. (2014). Blackwords: writers on identity. Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature, 14(3): 1–13.Google Scholar
Heiss, A. and Minter, P. (2014). Macquarie Pen Anthology of Aboriginal Literature. NSW: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hockx, M. and Smits, I. (2003). Theory as practice: modern Chinese literature and Bourdieu. Reading East Asian Writing: The Limits of Literary Theory, 12, 220–39.Google Scholar
Huggan, G. (2001). The Postcolonial Exotic: Marketing the Margins. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (1997). Bringing Them Home: National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families. Sydney: Human Rights & Equal Opportunity Commission.Google Scholar
Hurt, E. (2009). Trading cultural baggage for Gucci luggage: the ambivalent Latinidad of Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez’s the Dirty Girls Social Club. MELUS: Multi-Ethnic Literature of the US, 34(3), 133–53.Google Scholar
Hurt, E. (2017). Cultural citizenship and agency in the genre of chica lit and Sofia Quintero’s feminist intervention. MELUS: Multi-Ethnic Literature of the US, 42(1), 7-31.Google Scholar
Hurt, E. (2018a). Theorizing Ethnicity and Nationality in the Chick Lit Genre. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurt, E. (2018b). The white Terry McMillan: centering black women within chick lit’s genealogy. In Hurt, E., ed., Theorizing Ethnicity and Nationality in the Chick Lit Genre. New York: Routledge, pp.150–74.Google Scholar
Iser, W. (1978). The Act of Reading: a Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jauss, H. R and Benzinger, E. (1970). Literary history as a challenge to literary theory. New Literary History, 2(1), 7–37.Google Scholar
Johnson, R. (1993). Editor’s Introduction: Pierre Bourdieu on art, literature and culture. In P. Bourdieu. The Field of Cultural Production. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Lamaison, P. (1986). From rules to strategies: an interview with Pierre Bourdieu. Cultural Anthropology, 1(1), 110–20.Google Scholar
Langton, M. (1993). Well, I Heard it on the Radio and I saw it on the Television … : an Essay for the Australian Film Commission on the Politics and Aesthetics of Filmmaking by and about Aboriginal People and Things. Sydney: Australian Film Commission Sydney.Google Scholar
Leane, J.. (2012). Counting our victories: the end of Garvey-Ism and the soft bigotry of low expectation. Boyer Lecture Series. 16 December. www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/boyerlectures/series/2012-boyer-lectures/4305696. Accessed 26 November 2020.Google Scholar
Leane, J. (2010). Aboriginal representation: conflict or dialogue in the academy. The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education, 39(1), 32–9.Google Scholar
Leane, J.. (2014). Tracking our country in settler literature. Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature, 14(3), 1–17.Google Scholar
Leane, J.. (2016). Other peoples’ stories: when is writing cultural appropriation? Overland, 225, 41.Google Scholar
Long, E. (2003). Book Clubs: Women and the Uses of Reading in Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ludlow, F., Baker, L., Brock, S., Hebdon, C. and Dove, M. (2016). The double binds of indigeneity and indigenous resistance. Humanities, 5(3), 53.Google Scholar
Mabry, A. R. (2006). About a girl: female subjectivity and sexuality in contemporary ‘chick’. In Ferriss, S. and Young, M., eds., Chick Lit: the New Woman’s Fiction. New York: Routledge, pp. 191–206.Google Scholar
Malik, A. (2019). Chick lit as a trajectory of Jean Baudrillard’s the consumer society: an Indian perspective. IJELLH (International Journal of English Language, Literature in Humanities), 7,13–13.Google Scholar
Mathew, I. (2016a). The pretty and the political didn’t seem to blend well’: Anita Heiss’s chick lit and the destabilisation of a genre. Journal of the Association for the Study of Australian Literature, 15(3), 1–11.Google Scholar
Mathew, I.. (2016b). Educating the reader in Anita Heiss’s chick lit. Contemporary Women’s Writing, 10(3), 334–53.Google Scholar
Mathew, I.. (2016c). Reviewing race in the digital literary sphere: a case study of Anita Heiss’ am I black enough for you? Australian Humanities Review, 60, 65–83.Google Scholar
Merrick, E. (2006). This Is Not Chick Lit: Original Stories by America’s Best Women Writers (No Heels Required). New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Meyer, Neele. (2018). Challenging gender and genre: women in contemporary Indian crime fiction in English. Zeitschrift für Anglistik und Amerikanistik. 66, 105–17.Google Scholar
Mißler, H. (2016). The Cultural Politics of Chick Lit: Popular Fiction, Postfeminism and Representation. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moi, T. (1997). The challenge of the particular case: Bourdieu’s sociology of culture and literary criticism. Modern Language Quarterly, 58(4), 497.Google Scholar
Moji, P. B. (2018). Divas and deviance: hip-hop feminism and black visuality in Lauren Ekué’s Icône Urbaine (2006). Agenda. 32(3), 10–20.Google Scholar
Montoro, R. (2012). Chick Lit: The Stylistics of Cappuccino Fiction. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Moreton-Robinson, A. (2000). Talkin’up to the White Woman: Aboriginal Women and Feminism. Queensland: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Morrison, A. M. 2010. Chicanas and ‘chick lit’: contested Latinidad in the novels of Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez. The Journal of Popular Culture, 43(2), 309–29.Google Scholar
Muecke, S. (1992). Textual Spaces: Aboriginality and Cultural Studies, Sydney: New South Wales University Press.Google Scholar
Naik, Y. (2012). Finding good reads on Goodreads: readers take RA into their own hands. Reference & User Services Quarterly, 51(4), 319.Google Scholar
Nakamura, L. (2013). ‘Words with friends’: socially networked reading on Goodreads. PMLA, 128(1), 238–43.Google Scholar
Nakata, M. N. (2007). Disciplining the Savages, Savaging the Disciplines. Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press.Google Scholar
Newns, L. (2018). Renegotiating romantic genres: textual resistance and Muslim chick lit. The Journal of Commonwealth Literature, 53(2), 284–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogunnaike, L. (2004). Black writers seize glamorous ground around ‘Chick Lit’. New York Times, 31 May.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, L. (2018). More than sex, shopping, and shoes: cosmopolitan indigeneity and cultural politics in Anita Heiss’s Koori lit. In E. Hurt, ed., Theorizing Ethnicity and Nationality in the Chick Lit Genre. New York/London: Routledge, pp. 41–68.Google Scholar
Ommundsen, W. (2011). Sex and the global city: chick lit with a difference. Contemporary Women’s Writing, 5(2), 107–24.Google Scholar
O’Reilly, N. (ed.) (2010). Postcolonial Issues in Australian Literature. New York: Cambria Press.Google Scholar
Pearson, N. (2016). Soft bigotry holds back Indigenous reform. The Australian, 10 December.Google Scholar
Pham, K. (2017, 1 July). Indigenous author Anita Heiss opens new chapter at UC. www.canberra.edu.au. Accessed 2 June 2018.Google Scholar
Radway, J. (1984). Reading the Romance: Women, Patriarchy, and Popular Culture, London: The University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Ramírez, C. S. (2009). End of Chicanismo: Alisa Valdes-Rodriguez’s Dirty Girls. https://rca.ucsc.edu/documents/report-02-ramirez.pdf. Accessed 2 June 2018.Google Scholar
Reconciliation Australia. Strategic Plan 2017–2022. www.reconciliation.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/ra-strategic-plan_web.pdf. Accessed 16 December 2017.Google Scholar
Rehberg Sedo, D. (2003). Readers in reading groups: an online survey of face-to-face and virtual book clubs. Convergence, 9(1), 67–90.Google Scholar
Rehberg Sedo, D.. (2011) Reading Communities From Salons to Cyberspace. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Rehberg Sedo, D.. (2017). Reading reception in the digital era. Oxford Research Encyclopedias. http://literature.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.001.0001/acrefore-9780190201098-e–285. Accessed 6 September 2018.Google Scholar
Rowntree, M., Moulding, N. and Bryant, L. (2012). Feminine sexualities in chick lit. Australian Feminist Studies, 27(72), 121–37.Google Scholar
Scott, R. and Heiss, A. (eds.) (2015). The Intervention: an Anthology. Australia: Griffin Press.Google Scholar
Séllei, N. (2006). Bridget Jones and Hungarian chick lit. In Ferriss, S. and Young, M., eds., Chick Lit: the New Woman’s Fiction. New York: Routledge, pp. 173–88.Google Scholar
Speller, J. R. W. (2013). Bourdieu and Literature. Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers.Google Scholar
Spencer, L. G. (2019). ‘In defence of chick-lit’: refashioning feminine subjectivities in Ugandan and South African contemporary women’s writing. Feminist Theory, 20(2), 155–69.Google Scholar
Steiner, A. (2008). Private criticism in the public space: personal writing on literature in readers’ reviews on Amazon. Participations, 5(2) www.participations.org/Volume%205/Issue%202/5_02_steiner.htm. Accessed 25 January 2017.Google Scholar
Swann, J. and Allington, D. (2009). Reading groups and the language of literary texts: a case study in social reading. Language and Literature, 18(3), 247–64.Google Scholar
Thelwall, M. and Kousha, K. (2017). Goodreads: a social network site for book readers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 68(4), 972–83.Google Scholar
Tuchman, G. and Fortin, N. E. (1989). Edging Women Out: Victorian Novelists, Publishers and Social Change. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Umminger, A. (2006). Supersizing Bridget Jones: what’s really eating the women in chick lit. In Ferriss, S. and Young, M., eds., Chick Lit: The New Woman’s Fiction. New York: Routledge, pp. 239–52.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, A. (2018). Chica lit: popular Latina fiction and Americanization in the twenty-first century by Tace Hedrick. Studies in Latin American Popular Culture, 36, 180–2.Google Scholar
Verboord, M. (2014). The impact of peer-produced criticism on cultural evaluation: a multilevel analysis of discourse employment in online and offline film reviews. New Media & Society, 16(6), 921–40.Google Scholar
Vlieghe, J., Muls, J. and Rutten, K. 2016. Everybody reads: reader engagement with literature in social media environments. Poetics, 54, 25–37.Google Scholar
Wolfe, P. (2006). Settler colonialism and the elimination of the native. Journal of Genocide Research, 8(4), 387–409.Google Scholar
Yardley, C. (2006). Will Write for Shoes: How to Write a Chick Lit Novel. New York: Thomas Dunne Books.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 7
- Cited by