Element contents
Series: Elements in Organization Theory
A Connected World
Social Networks and Organizations
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 June 2023
Summary
This Element synthesizes the current state of research on organizational social networks from its early foundations to contemporary debates. It highlights the characteristics that make the social network perspective distinctive in the organizational research landscape, including its emphasis on structure and outcomes. It covers the main theoretical developments and summarizes the research design questions that organizational researchers face when collecting and analyzing network data. Then, it discusses current debates ranging from agency and structure to network volatility and personality. Finally, the Element envisages future research directions on the role of brokerage for individuals and communities, network cognition, and the importance of past ties. Overall, the Element provides an innovative angle for understanding organizational social networks, engaging in empirical network research, and nurturing further theoretical development on the role of social interactions and connectedness in modern organizations.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Organization TheoryOnline ISBN: 9781009179508Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 20 July 2023
References
Abolafia, M. Y. & Kilduff, M. (1988). Enacting market crisis: The social construction of a speculative bubble. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(2), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adler, P. S. & Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.Google Scholar
Agneessens, F. & Labianca, G. J. (2022). Collecting survey-based social network information in work organizations. Social Networks, 68 (1), 31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ahuja, G., Soda, G. & Zaheer, A. (2012). The genesis and dynamics of organizational networks. Organization Science, 23(2), 434–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amati, V., Lomi, A. & Mira, A. (2018). Social network modeling. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application, 5, 343–369.Google Scholar
Arthur, M. B. & Rousseau, D. M. (1996). The Boundaryless Career. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, M. (2010). The strength-of-weak-ties perspective on creativity: A comprehensive examination and extension. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 592–601.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, W. E. (1984). The social structure of a national securities market. American Journal of Sociology, 89(4), 775–811.Google Scholar
Baker, W. E. & Bulkley, N. (2014). Paying it forward vs. rewarding reputation: Mechanisms of generalized reciprocity. Organization Science, 25(5), 1493–1510.Google Scholar
Balkundi, P. & Harrison, D. A. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barley, S. R. (1990). The alignment of technology and structure through roles and networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 61–103.Google Scholar
Barnard, C. (1938). The Functions of the Executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Battilana, J. & Casciaro, T. (2012). Change agents, networks, and institutions: A contingency theory of organizational change. Academy of Management Journal, 55(2), 381–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baum, J. A. C., Shipilov, A. V. & Rowley, T. J. (2003). Where do small worlds come from? Industrial and Corporate Change, 12(4), 697–725.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berkman, L. F. & Syme, S. L. (1979). Social networks, host resistance, and mortality: A nine-year follow-up study of Alameda County residents. American Journal of Epidemiology, 109(2), 186–204.Google Scholar
Biernacki, P. & Waldorf, D. (1981). Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methods & Research, 10(2), 141–163.Google Scholar
Blau, P. M. (1977). A macrosociological theory of social structure. American Journal of Sociology, 83(1), 26–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blau, P. M., Blum, T. C. & Schwartz, J. E. (1982). Heterogeneity and intermarriage. American Sociological Review, 47(1), 45–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonacich, P. (1972). Factoring and weighting approaches to clique identification. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 2(1), 113–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonacich, P. (2007). Some unique properties of eigenvector centrality. Social Networks, 29(4), 555–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boorman, S. A. & White, H. C. (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. II. Role structures. American Journal of Sociology, 81(6), 1384–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. P. & Everett, M. G. (2000). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21(4), 375–395.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P. & Everett, M. G. (2006). A graph-theoretic perspective on centrality. Social Networks, 28(4), 466–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Borgatti, S. P. & Halgin, D. S. (2011). On network theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1168–1181.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Brass, D. J. & Halgin, D. S. (2014). Social network research: Confusions, criticisms, and controversies. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 40, 1–29.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Carley, K. M. & Krackhardt, D. (2006). On the robustness of centrality measures under conditions of imperfect data. Social Networks, 28(2), 124–136.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. & Freeman, L. C. (1999). UCINET 5 for Windows. Columbia, SC: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. & Johnson, J. C. (2013). Analyzing Social Networks. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G. & Johnson, J. C. (2018). Analyzing Social Networks, 2nd ed. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Borgatti, S. P., Jones, C. & Everett, M. G. (1998). Network measures of social capital. Connections, 21(2), 27–36.Google Scholar
Bott, E. (1955). Urban families, conjugal roles and social networks. Human Relations, 8(4), 345–383.Google Scholar
Brands, R. A. (2013). Cognitive social structures in social network research: A review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), S82–S103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brands, R. A. & Kilduff, M. (2014). Just like a woman? Effects of gender-biased perceptions of friendship network brokerage on attributions and performance. Organization Science, 25(5), 1530–1548.Google Scholar
Brands, R. A. & Mehra, A. (2019). Gender, brokerage, and performance: A construal approach. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 196–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brass, D. J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(4), 518–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brass, D. J. (2022). New developments in social network analysis. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 9, 225–246.Google Scholar
Breiger, R. L. (1974). The duality of persons and groups. Social Forces, 53(2), 181–190.Google Scholar
Brennecke, J. (2020). Dissonant ties in intraorganizational networks: Why individuals seek problem-solving assistance from difficult colleagues. Academy of Management Journal, 63(3), 743–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1980). Autonomy in a social topology. American Journal of Sociology, 85(4), 892–925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1984). Network items and the general social survey. Social Networks, 6(4), 293–340.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1287–1335.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(2), 339–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. (1998). The gender of social capital. Rationality and Society, 10(1), 5–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. Research in Organizational Behavior, 22, 345–423.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2007). Secondhand brokerage: Evidence on the importance of local structure for managers, bankers, and analysts. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 119–148.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2010). Neighbor Networks: Competitive Advantage Local and Personal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2012). Network-related personality and the agency question: Multi-role evidence from a virtual world. American Journal of Sociology, 118(3), 543–591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. (2021). Structural holes capstone, cautions, and enthusiasms. In Small, M. L., Perry, B. L., Pescosolido, B., & Smith, N., eds., Personal Networks: Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. & Lin, N. (1977). Network time series from archival records. Sociological Methodology, 8, 224–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burt, R. S. & Merluzzi, J. (2016). Network oscillation. Academy of Management Discoveries, 2(4), 368–391.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. & Ronchi, D. (1990). Contested control in a large manufacturing plant. In Wessie, J. & Flap, H., eds., Social Networks Through Time. Utrecht: ISOR, pp. 121–157.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S. & Wang, S. (2021). Bridge supervision: Correlates of a boss on the far side of a structural hole. Academy of Management Journal, 65(6), 1835–1863.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., Jannotta, J. E. & Mahoney, J. T. (1998). Personality correlates of structural holes. Social Networks, 20(1), 63–87.Google Scholar
Burt, R. S., Kilduff, M. & Tasselli, S. (2013). Social network analysis: Foundations and frontiers on advantage. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 527–547.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buskens, V. & van de Rijt, A. (2008). Dynamics of networks if everyone strives for structural holes. American Journal of Sociology, 114(2), 371–407.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. (2009). Alone in the crowd: The structure and spread of loneliness in a large social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 977–991.Google Scholar
Carley, K. (1991). A theory of group stability. American Sociological Review, 56(3), 331–354.Google Scholar
Cartwright, D. & Harary, F. (1956). Structural balance: A generalization of Heider’s theory. Psychological Review, 63(5), 277–293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casciaro, T., Gino, F. & Kouchaki, M. (2014). The contaminating effects of building instrumental ties: How networking can make us feel dirty. Administrative Science Quarterly, 59(4), 705–735.Google Scholar
Cattani, G. & Ferriani, S. (2008). A core/periphery perspective on individual creative performance: Social networks and cinematic achievements in the Hollywood film industry. Organization Science, 19(6), 824–844.Google Scholar
Centola, D. & Macy, M. (2007). Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113(3), 702–734.Google Scholar
Chen, H., Mehra, A., Tasselli, S. & Borgatti, S. P. (2022). Network dynamics and organizations: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 48(6), 1602–1660.Google Scholar
Christakis, N. A. & Fowler, J. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(4), 370–379.Google Scholar
Chua, R. Y., Morris, M. W. & Ingram, P. (2009). Guanxi vs networking: Distinctive configurations of affect-and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs American managers. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(3), 490–508.Google Scholar
Chung, M. H., Park, J., Moon, H. K. & Oh, H. (2011). The multilevel effects of network embeddedness on interpersonal citizenship behavior. Small Group Research, 42(6), 730–760.Google Scholar
Chung, Y. & Jackson, S. E. (2013). The internal and external networks of knowledge-intensive teams: The role of task routineness. Journal of Management, 39(2), 442–468.Google Scholar
Clarke, R., Richter, A. W. & Kilduff, M. (2021). One tie to capture advice and friendship: Leader multiplex centrality effects on team performance change. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(6), 968–986.Google Scholar
Cohen, S. & Janicki-Deverts, D. (2009). Can we improve our physical health by altering our social networks? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(4), 375–378.Google Scholar
Cohen, S., Doyle, W. J., Skoner, D. P., Rabin, B. S. & Gwaltney, J. M. (1997). Social ties and susceptibility to the common cold. Jama, 277(24), 1940–1944.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S., Katz, E. & Menzel, H. (1966). Medical Innovation. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Cross, R. & Cummings, J. N. (2004). Tie and network correlates of individual performance in knowledge-intensive work. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 928–937.Google Scholar
Cross, R., Borgatti, S. P. & Parker, A. (2002). Making invisible work visible: Using social network analysis to support strategic collaboration. California Management Review, 44(2), 25–46.Google Scholar
Cuypers, I. R., Ertug, G., Cantwell, J., Zaheer, A. & Kilduff, M. (2020). Making connections: Social networks in international business. Journal of International Business Studies, 51(5), 714–736.Google Scholar
Daraganova, G. & Robins, G. (2013). Autologistic actor attribute models. In Lusher, D., Koskinen, J. & Robins, G., eds., Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 102–114.Google Scholar
Davis, A., Gardner, B. B. & Gardner, M. R. (1941). Deep South: A Social Anthropological Study of Caste and Class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Davis, G. F. (1991). Agents without principles? The spread of the poison pill through the intercorporate network. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(4), 583–613.Google Scholar
Davis, G. F. & Greve, H. R. (1997). Corporate elite networks and governance changes in the 1980s. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 1–37.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, P. (1986). Structural analysis of organizational fields: A blockmodel approach. Research in Organizational Behavior, 8, 335–370.Google Scholar
Direnzo, M. S. & Greenhaus, J. H. (2011). Job search and voluntary turnover in a boundaryless world: A control theory perspective. Academy of Management Review, 36(3), 567–589.Google Scholar
Dodds, P. S., Muhamad, R. & Watts, D. J. (2003). An experimental study of search in global social networks. Science, 301(5634), 827–829.Google Scholar
Doreian, P. & Mrvar, A. (2009). Partitioning signed social networks. Social Networks, 31(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
Dorogovtsev, S. N. & Mendes, J. F. (2003). Evolution of Networks: From Biological Nets to the Internet and WWW. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, P. D. (2011). Social ties and international entrepreneurship: Opportunities and constraints affecting firm internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(1), 99–127.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. & Goodwin, J. (1994). Network analysis, culture, and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1411–1454.Google Scholar
Emirbayer, M. & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.Google Scholar
Erickson, B. (1988). The relational basis of attitudes. In Wellman, B. & Berkowitz, S., eds., Social Structures: A Network Approach. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 99–121.Google Scholar
Faris, R., Felmlee, D. & McMillan, C. (2020). With friends like these: Aggression from amity and equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 126(3), 673–713.Google Scholar
Fernandez, R. M. (2021). Strength in weak ties in the labor market: An assessment of the state of research. In Small, M. L., Perry, B. L., Pescosolido, B. A. & Smith, E. B., eds., Personal Networks: Classic Readings and New Directions in Egocentric Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 251–264.Google Scholar
Fernandez, R. M. & Gould, R. V. (1994). A dilemma of state power: Brokerage and influence in the national health policy domain. American Journal of Sociology, 99(6), 1455–1491.Google Scholar
Fernandez, R. M., Castilla, E. J. & Moore, P. (2000). Social capital at work: Networks and employment at a phone center. American Journal of Sociology, 105(5), 1288–1356.Google Scholar
Flynn, F. J., Reagans, R. E., Amanatullah, E. T. & Ames, D. R. (2006). Helping one’s way to the top: Self-monitors achieve status by helping others and knowing who helps whom. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1123–1137.Google Scholar
Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. (2008). Dynamic spread of happiness in a large social network: Longitudinal analysis over 20 years in the Framingham Heart Study. British Medical Journal, 338, a2338.Google Scholar
Frank, O. (1978). Sampling and estimation in large social networks. Social Networks, 1(1), 91–101.Google Scholar
Frank, O. (1979). Estimating a graph from triad counts. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 9(1), 31–46.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (1977). A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry, 40(1), 35–41.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1(3), 215–239.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C. (2004). The Development of Social Network Analysis: A Study in the Sociology of Science. Vancouver: Empirical Press.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C., Roeder, D. & Mulholland, R. R. (1979). Centrality in social networks: II. Experimental results. Social Networks, 2(2), 119–141.Google Scholar
Freeman, L. C., Romney, A. K. & Freeman, S. C. (1987). Cognitive structure and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 89(2), 310–325.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. (1953). Essays in Positive Economics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Furnari, S. (2014). Interstitial spaces: Microinteraction settings and the genesis of new practices between institutional fields. Academy of Management Review, 39(4), 439–462.Google Scholar
Galunic, C., Ertug, G. & Gargiulo, M. (2012). The positive externalities of social capital: Benefiting from senior brokers. Academy of Management Journal, 55(5), 1213–1231.Google Scholar
Ghoshal, S. & Bartlett, C. A. (1990). The multinational corporation as an interorganizational network. Academy of Management Review, 15(4), 603–626.Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1969). Strategic Interaction. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Goyal, S. (2007). Connections: An Introduction to the Economics of Networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360–1380.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1983). The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory, 1, 201–233.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.Google Scholar
Granovetter, M. S. (2005). The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(1), 33–50.Google Scholar
Gulati, R., Nohria, N. & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal, 21(3), 203–215.Google Scholar
Halevy, N. & Kalish, Y. (2021). Broadening versus deepening: Gender and brokering in social networks. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 618–625.Google Scholar
Hansen, M. T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(1), 82–111.Google Scholar
Hargadon, A. B. (2006). Bridging old worlds and building new ones: Towards a microsociology of creativity. In Thompson, L. & Choi, H. S., eds., Creativity and Innovation in Organizational Teams. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,pp. 199–216.Google Scholar
Hayton, J. C., Carnabuci, G. & Eisenberger, R. (2012). With a little help from my colleagues: A social embeddedness approach to perceived organizational support. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 235–249.Google Scholar
Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. Journal of Psychology, 21(1), 107–112.Google Scholar
Heidl, R. A., Steensma, H. K. & Phelps, C. (2014). Divisive faultlines and the unplanned dissolutions of multipartner alliances. Organization Science, 25(5), 1351–1371.Google Scholar
Holland, P. W. & Leinhardt, S. (1977). Transitivity in structural models of small groups. In Leinhardt, S., ed., Social Networks: A Developing Paradigm. New York: Academic Press, pp. 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, L. J. & Schultz, J. (1976). Quadratic assignment as a general data analysis strategy. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 29(2), 190–241.Google Scholar
Hummon, N. P. & Carley, K. (1993). Social networks as normal science. Social Networks, 15(1), 71–106.Google Scholar
Ingram, P. & Morris, M. W. (2007). Do people mix at mixers? Structure, homophily, and the “life of the party.” Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(4), 558–585.Google Scholar
Iorio, A. (2022). Brokers in disguise: The joint effect of actual brokerage and socially perceived brokerage on network advantage. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(3), 769–820.Google Scholar
Janicik, G. A. & Larrick, R. P. (2005). Social network schemas and the learning of incomplete networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 348–364.Google Scholar
Jensen, M. & Wang, P. (2018). Not in the same boat: How status inconsistency affects research performance in business schools. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 1021–1049.Google Scholar
Kapferer, B. (1972). Strategy and Transaction in an African Factory: African Workers and Indian Management in a Zambian Town. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Kilduff, G. J. (2019). Interfirm relational rivalry: Implications for competitive strategy. Academy of Management Review, 44(4), 775–799.Google Scholar
Kilduff, M. (1992). The friendship network as a decision-making resource: Dispositional moderators of social influences on organizational choice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(1), 168–180.Google Scholar
Kilduff, M. & Brass, D. J. (2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 317–357.Google Scholar
Kilduff, M., Crossland, C., Tsai, W. & Bowers, M. T. (2016). Magnification and correction of the acolyte effect: Initial benefits and ex post settling up in NFL coaching careers. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 352–375.Google Scholar
Kilduff, M., Crossland, C., Tsai, W. & Krackhardt, D. (2008). Organizational network perceptions versus reality: A small world after all? Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107(1), 15–28.Google Scholar
Kilduff, M. & Krackhardt, D. (1994). Bringing the individual back in: A structural analysis of the internal market for reputation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 37(1), 87–108.Google Scholar
Kilduff, M. & Lee, J. W. (2020). The integration of people and networks. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 155–179.Google Scholar
Kilduff, M. & Oh, H. (2006). Deconstructing diffusion: An ethnostatistical examination of medical innovation network data reanalyses. Organizational Research Methods, 9(4), 432–455.Google Scholar
Kilduff, M., Tsai, W. & Hanke, R. (2006). A paradigm too far? A dynamic stability reconsideration of the social network research program. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1031–1048.Google Scholar
Kim, T. Y., Oh, H. & Swaminathan, A. (2006). Framing interorganizational network change: A network inertia perspective. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 704–720.Google Scholar
Klein, K. J., Lim, B. C., Saltz, J. L. & Mayer, D. M. (2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 952–963.Google Scholar
Kleinbaum, A. M., Jordan, A. H. & Audia, P. G. (2015). An altercentric perspective on the origins of brokerage in social networks: How perceived empathy moderates the self-monitoring effect. Organization Science, 26(4), 1226–1242.Google Scholar
Kleinbaum, A. M., Stuart, T. E. & Tushman, M. L. (2013). Discretion within constraint: Homophily and structure in a formal organization. Organization Science, 24(5), 1316–1336.Google Scholar
Korte, C. & Milgram, S. (1970). Acquaintance networks between racial groups: Application of the small world method. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(2), 101–108.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1988). Predicting with networks: Non-parametric multiple regression analysis of dyadic data. Social Networks, 10(4), 359–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1990). Assessing the political landscape: Structure, cognition, and power in organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 342–369.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1992). The strength of strong ties: The importance of philos in organizations. In , N. & Eccles, R., eds., Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp. 216–239.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1998). Simmelian ties: Super, strong and sticky. In Kramer, R. and Neale, M., eds., Power and Influence in Organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 21–38.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. (1999). The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 16, 183–210.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. & Hanson, J. R. (1993). Informal networks: The company behind the chart. Harvard Business Review, 71(4), 104–111.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. & Kilduff, M. (1999). Whether close or far: Social distance effects on perceived balance in friendship networks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(5), 770–782.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. & Kilduff, M. (2002). Structure, culture and Simmelian ties in entrepreneurial firms. Social Networks, 24(3), 279–290.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. & Porter, L. W. (1986). The snowball effect: Turnover embedded in communication networks. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71(1), 50–55.Google Scholar
Krackhardt, D. & Stern, R. (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 51(2), 123–140.Google Scholar
Krivitsky, P. N. & Handcock, M. S. (2014). A separable model for dynamic networks. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 76(1), 29–46.Google Scholar
Kumbasar, E., Romney, A. K. & Batchelder, W. H. (1994). Systematic biases in social perception. American Journal of Sociology, 100(2), 477–505.Google Scholar
Kwon, S. W., Rondi, E., Levin, D. Z., De Massis, A. & Brass, D. J. (2020). Network brokerage: An integrative review and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1092–1120.Google Scholar
Labianca, G. & Brass, D. J. (2006). Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 596–614.Google Scholar
Labianca, G., Brass, D. J. & Gray, B. (1998). Social networks and perceptions of intergroup conflict: The role of negative relationships and third parties. Academy of Management Journal, 41(1), 55–67.Google Scholar
Labianca, G., Fairbank, J. F., Thomas, J. B., Gioia, D. A. & Umphress, E. E. (2001). Emulation in academia: Balancing structure and identity. Organization Science, 12(3), 312–330.Google Scholar
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In Lakatos, I. & Musgrave, A., eds., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 91–196.Google Scholar
Landis, B., Kilduff, M., Menges, J. I. & Kilduff, G. J. (2018). The paradox of agency: Feeling powerful reduces brokerage opportunity recognition yet increases willingness to broker. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(8), 929–938.Google Scholar
Laudan, L. (1977). Progress and Its Problems: Towards a Theory of Scientific Growth. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Laursen, K., Masciarelli, F. & Prencipe, A. (2012). Regions matter: How localized social capital affects innovation and external knowledge acquisition. Organization Science, 23(1), 177–193.Google Scholar
Lazega, E. & Pattison, P. E. (1999). Multiplexity, generalized exchange and cooperation in organizations: A case study. Social Networks, 21(1), 67–90.Google Scholar
Lee, S. H., Kim, P. J., Ahn, Y. Y. & Jeong, H. (2010). Googling social interactions: Web search engine based social network construction. Plos One, 5(7), e11233.Google Scholar
Levin, D. Z., Walter, J. & Murnighan, J. K. (2011). Dormant ties: The value of reconnecting. Organization Science, 22(4), 923–939.Google Scholar
Lin, N. (2001). Social Capital: A Theory of Social Structure and Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lin, N., Ensel, W. & Vaughn, J. (1981). Social resources and strength of ties: Structural factors in occupational status attainment. American Sociological Review, 46(4), 393–405.Google Scholar
Lomi, A., Lusher, D., Pattison, P. E. & Robins, G. (2014). The focused organization of advice relations: A study in boundary crossing. Organization Science, 25(2), 438–457.Google Scholar
Lorrain, F. & White, H. C. (1971). Structural equivalence of individuals in social networks. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1(1), 49–80.Google Scholar
Luce, R. D. & Perry, A. D. (1949). A method of matrix analysis of group structure. Psychometrika, 14, 95–116.Google Scholar
Luk, C. L., Yau, O. H., Sin, L. Y., Tse, A. C., Chow, R. P. & Lee, J. S. (2008). The effects of social capital and organizational innovativeness in different institutional contexts. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(4), 589–612.Google Scholar
Luo, Y. (2007). An integrated anti-opportunism system in international exchange. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 855–877.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. V. (2011). Survey methods for network data. In Scott, J. & Carrington, P. J., eds., Sage Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. V. & Campbell, K. E. (1984). Measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 63(2), 482–501.Google Scholar
Marsden, P. V. & Campbell, K. E. (2012). Reflections on conceptualizing and measuring tie strength. Social Forces, 91(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
Mayhew, B. H. (1980). Structuralism versus individualism: Part 1, shadowboxing in the dark. Social Forces, 59(2), 335–375.Google Scholar
McPherson, J. M., Smith-Lovin, L. & Brashears, M. E. (2006). Social isolation in America: Changes in core discussion networks over two decades. American Sociological Review, 71(3), 353–375.Google Scholar
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M. & Brass, D. J. (1998). At the margins: A distinctiveness approach to the social identity and social networks of underrepresented groups. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 441–452.Google Scholar
Mehra, A., Kilduff, M. & Brass, D. J. (2001). The social networks of high and low self-monitors: Implications for workplace performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 121–146.Google Scholar
Mehra, A., Dixon, A. L., Brass, D. J. & Robertson, B. (2006). The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leader reputation. Organization Science, 17(1), 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehra, A., Borgatti, S. P., Soltis, S., Floyd, T., Halgin, D. S., Ofem, B. & Lopez-Kidwell, V. (2014). Imaginary worlds: Using visual network scales to capture perceptions of social networks. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 40, 315–336.Google Scholar
Menges, J. I. & Kilduff, M. (2015). Group emotions: Cutting the Gordian knots concerning terms, levels of analysis, and processes. Academy of Management Annals, 9(1), 845–928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A. D. (1982). Adapting to environmental jolts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 27(4), 515–537.Google Scholar
Mizruchi, M. S., Stearns, L. B. & Fleischer, A. (2011). Getting a bonus: Social networks, performance, and reward among commercial bankers. Organization Science, 22(1), 42–59.Google Scholar
Mollica, K. A., Gray, B. & Trevino, L. K. (2003). Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers’ social networks. Organization Science, 14(2), 123–136.Google Scholar
Montgomery, J. D. (1992). Job search and network composition: Implications of the strength-of-weak-tie hypothesis. American Sociological Review, 57(5), 586–596.Google Scholar
Moody, J., McFarland, D. & Bender-deMoll, S. (2005). Dynamic network visualization. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 1206–1241.Google Scholar
Moore, M. L. & Westley, F. (2011). Surmountable chasms: Networks and social innovation for resilient systems. Ecology and Society, 16(1), 5.Google Scholar
Moreno, J. L. (1934). Who Shall Survive? A New Approach to the Problem of Human Interrelations. Washington, DC: Nervous and Mental Disease Publishing.Google Scholar
Mund, M. & Neyer, F. J. (2014). Treating personality-relationship transactions with respect: Narrow facets, advanced models, and extended time frames. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(2), 352–368.Google Scholar
Nahapiet, J. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organization advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.Google Scholar
Nambisan, S. & Sawhney, M. (2011). Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation: Evidence from the field. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 40–57.Google Scholar
Nelson, R. E. (1988). Social network analysis as intervention tool: Examples from the field. Group & Organization Studies, 13(1), 39–58.Google Scholar
Newman, M. E. (2002). Assortative mixing in networks. Physical Review Letters, 89(20), 208701-1–208701-4.Google Scholar
Nicolaou, N. & Kilduff, M. (2022). Empowerment mitigates gender differences in tertius iungens brokering. Organization Science. In press.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, D. (2005). Social networks, the tertius iungens orientation, and involvement in innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 100–130.Google Scholar
Obstfeld, D., Borgatti, S. P. & Davis, J. (2014). Brokerage as a process: Decoupling third party action from social network structure. Contemporary Perspectives on Organizational Social Networks, 40, 135–159.Google Scholar
Ogle, D. L., Tenkasi, R. R. V. & Brock, W. B. B. (2020). The social media presence of organization development: A social network analysis using big data. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 28, 1–41.Google Scholar
Oh, H. & Kilduff, M. (2008). The ripple effect of personality on social structure: Self-monitoring origins of network brokerage. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(5), 1155–1164.Google Scholar
Oh, W. & Jeon, S. (2007). Membership herding and network stability in the open source community: The Ising perspective. Management Science, 53(7), 1086–1101.Google Scholar
O’Mahony, S. & Ferraro, F. (2007). The emergence of governance in an open source community. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 1079–1106.Google Scholar
Operti, E., Lampronti, S. Y. & Sgourev, S. V. (2020). Hold your horses: Temporal multiplexity and conflict moderation in the Palio di Siena (1743–2010). Organization Science, 31(1), 85–102.Google Scholar
Padgett, J. F. & Ansell, C. K. (1993). Robust action and the rise of the Medici, 1400–1434. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1259–1319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pastor, J. C., Meindl, J. R. & Mayo, M. C. (2002). A network effects model of charisma attributions. Academy of Management Journal, 45(2), 410–420.Google Scholar
Perry, B. L., Pescosolido, B. A. & Borgatti, S. P. (2018). Egocentric Network Analysis: Foundations, Methods, and Models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Perry-Smith, J. E. (2006). Social yet creative: The role of social relationships in facilitating individual creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 85–101.Google Scholar
Perry-Smith, J. E. & Shalley, C. E. (2003). The social side of creativity: A static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review, 28(1), 89–106.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Pinquart, M. & Duberstein, P. R. (2010). Associations of social networks with cancer mortality: A meta-analysis. Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 75(2), 122–137.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. M. (2001). Networks as the pipes and prisms of the market. American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 33–60.Google Scholar
Podolny, J. M. & Baron, J. N. (1997). Resources and relationships: Social networks and mobility in the workplace. American Sociological Review, 62(5), 673–693.Google Scholar
Polanyi, M. (1963). The potential theory of absorption: Authority in science has its uses and its dangers. Science, 141(3585), 1010–1013.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W. & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(1), 116–145.Google Scholar
Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12, 295–336.Google Scholar
Prell, C. (2012). Social Network Analysis: History, Theory and Methodology. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Quintane, E. & Carnabuci, G. (2016). How do brokers broker? Tertius gaudens, tertius iungens, and the temporality of structural holes. Organization Science, 27(6), 1343–1360.Google Scholar
Raider, H. & Krackhardt, D. J. (2002). Intraorganizational networks. In Baum, J. A. C., ed., The Blackwell Companion to Organizations. London: Blackwell, pp. 58–74.Google Scholar
Rajkumar, K., Saint-Jacques, G., Bojinov, I., Brynjolfsson, E. & Aral, S. (2022). A causal test of the strength of weak ties. Science, 377(6612), 1304–1310.Google Scholar
Rank, O. N., Robins, G. L. & Pattison, P. E. (2010). Structural logic of intraorganizational networks. Organization Science, 21(3), 745–764.Google Scholar
Ripley, R. M., Snijders, T. A. B., Boda, Z., Vörös, A. & Preciado, P. (2022). Manual for SIENA (Version 1.3.8). Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Rivera, M. T., Soderstrom, S. B. & Uzzi, B. (2010). Dynamics of dyads in social networks: Assortative, relational, and proximity mechanisms. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 91–115.Google Scholar
Robins, G., Pattison, P. & Wang, P. (2009). Closure, connectivity and degree distributions: Exponential random graph (p*) models for directed social networks. Social Networks, 31(2), 105–117.Google Scholar
Robins, G., Pattison, P. & Woolcock, J. (2005). Small and other worlds: Global network structures from local processes. American Journal of Sociology, 110(4), 894–936.Google Scholar
Rodan, S. & Galunic, C. (2004). More than network structure: How knowledge heterogeneity influences managerial performance and innovativeness. Strategic Management Journal, 25(6), 541–562.Google Scholar
Roethlisberger, F. J. & Dickson, W. J. (1939). Management and the Worker. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenquist, J. N., Fowler, J. H. & Christakis, N. A. (2011). Social network determinants of depression. Molecular Psychiatry, 16(3), 273–281.Google Scholar
Sander, T. H. & Putnam, R. D. (2010). Democracy’s past and future: Still bowling alone? The post-9/11 split. Journal of Democracy, 21(1), 9–16.Google Scholar
Sasidharan, S., Santhanam, R., Brass, D. J. & Sambamurthy, V. (2012). The effects of social network structure on enterprise systems success: A longitudinal multilevel analysis. Information Systems Research, 23(3-part-1), 658–678.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sasovova, Z., Mehra, A., Borgatti, S. P. & Schippers, M. C. (2010). Network churn: The effects of self-monitoring personality on brokerage dynamics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 55(4), 639–670.Google Scholar
Schaefer, D. R., Haas, S. A. & Bishop, N. J. (2012). A dynamic model of US adolescents’ smoking and friendship networks. American Journal of Public Health, 102(6), e12–e18.Google Scholar
Schulte, M., Cohen, N. A. & Klein, K. J. (2012). The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organization Science, 23(2), 564–581.Google Scholar
Scott, J. & Carrington, P. J. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Shipilov, A. V. & Gawer, A. (2020). Integrating research on interorganizational networks and ecosystems. Academy of Management Annals, 14(1), 92–121.Google Scholar
Shipilov, A. V., Greve, H. R. & Rowley, T. J. (2010). When do interlocks matter? Institutional logics and the diffusion of multiple corporate governance practices. Academy of Management Journal, 53(4), 846–864.Google Scholar
Shipilov, A., Gulati, R., Kilduff, M., Li, S. & Tsai, W. (2014). Relational pluralism within and between organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 449–459.Google Scholar
Siciliano, M. D., Welch, E. W. & Feeney, M. K. (2018). Network exploration and exploitation: Professional network churn and scientific production. Social Networks, 52, 167–179.Google Scholar
Smith, E. B., Menon, T. & Thompson, L. (2012). Status differences in the cognitive activation of social networks. Organization Science, 23(1), 67–82.Google Scholar
Smith, K. P. & Christakis, N. A. (2008). Social networks and health. Annual Review of Sociology, 34(1), 405–429.Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B. (2001). The statistical evaluation of social network dynamics. In Sobel, M. & Becker, M., eds., Sociological Methodology. Boston, MA: Basil Blackwell, pp. 361–395.Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B. (2005). Models for longitudinal network data. In Carrington, P. J., Scott, J. & Wasserman, S., eds., Models and Methods in Social Network Analysis.Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 215–247.Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B., van de Bunt, G. G. & Steglich, C. E. (2010). Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks, 32(1), 44–60.Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. B., Pattison, P. E., Robins, G. L. & Handcock, M. S. (2006). New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology, 36(1), 99–153.Google Scholar
Soda, G., Tortoriello, M. & Iorio, A. (2018). Harvesting value from brokerage: Individual strategic orientation, structural holes, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 896–918.Google Scholar
Soda, G., Usai, A. & Zaheer, A. (2004). Network memory: The influence of past and current networks on performance. Academy of Management Journal, 47(6), 893–906.Google Scholar
Sosa, M. E. (2011). Where do creative interactions come from? The role of tie content and social networks. Organization Science, 22(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Sparrowe, R. T. & Liden, R. C. (2005). Two routes to influence: Integrating leader-member exchange and network perspectives. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(4), 505–535.Google Scholar
Spinney, L. (2022). Are we witnessing the dawn of post-theory science? Guardian, January 9. www.theguardian.com/technology/2022/jan/09/are-we-witnessing-the-dawn-of-post-theory-science.Google Scholar
Stovel, K., Golub, B. & Milgrom, E. M. M. (2011). Stabilizing brokerage. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108(Supplement 4), 21326–21332.Google Scholar
Styles, C., Patterson, P. G. & Ahmed, F. (2008). A relational model of export performance. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(5), 880–900.Google Scholar
Sytch, M. & Tatarynowicz, A. (2014). Friends and foes: The dynamics of dual social structures. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 585–613.Google Scholar
Tasselli, S. (2015). Social networks and inter-professional knowledge transfer: The case of healthcare professionals. Organization Studies, 36(7), 841–872.Google Scholar
Tasselli, S. & Kilduff, M. (2018). When brokerage between friendship cliques endangers trust: A personality–network fit perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 61(3), 802–825.Google Scholar
Tasselli, S. & Kilduff, M. (2021). Network agency. Academy of Management Annals, 15(1), 68–110.Google Scholar
Tasselli, S. & Sancino, A. (2023). Leaders’ networking behaviours in a time of crisis: A qualitative study on the frontline against COVID‐19. Journal of Management Studies, 60(1), 120–173.Google Scholar
Tasselli, S., Kilduff, M. & Landis, B. (2018). Personality change: Implications for organizational behavior. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 467–493.Google Scholar
Tasselli, S., Kilduff, M. & Menges, J. I. (2015). The microfoundations of organizational social networks: A review and an agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1361–1387.Google Scholar
Tasselli, S., Neray, B. & Lomi, A. (2023). A network centrality bias: Central individuals in workplace networks have more supportive coworkers. Social Networks, 73(1), 30–41.Google Scholar
Tasselli, S., Zappa, P. & Lomi, A. (2020). Bridging cultural holes in organizations: The dynamic structure of social networks and organizational vocabularies within and across subunits. Organization Science, 31(5), 1292–1312.Google Scholar
Tichy, N. M., Tushman, M. L. & Fombrun, C. (1979). Social network analysis for organizations. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 507–519.Google Scholar
Tong, S. T., Van Der Heide, B., Langwell, L. & Walther, J. B. (2008). Too much of a good thing? The relationship between number of friends and interpersonal impressions on Facebook. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(3), 531–549.Google Scholar
Tortoriello, M., McEvily, B. & Krackhardt, D. (2015). Being a catalyst of innovation: The role of knowledge diversity and network closure. Organization Science, 26(2), 423–438.Google Scholar
Tortoriello, M., Reagans, R. & McEvily, B. (2012). Bridging the knowledge gap: The influence of strong ties, network cohesion, and network range on the transfer of knowledge between organizational units. Organization Science, 23(4), 1024–1039.Google Scholar
Travers, J. & Milgram, S. (1969). An experimental study of the small world problem. Sociometry, 32(4), 425–443.Google Scholar
Tröster, C., Parker, A., Van Knippenberg, D. & Sahlmüller, B. (2019). The coevolution of social networks and thoughts of quitting. Academy of Management Journal, 62(1), 22–43.Google Scholar
Tsai, W. (2001). Knowledge transfer in intraorganizational networks: Effects of network position and absorptive capacity on business unit innovation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(5), 996–1004.Google Scholar
Tsai, W. & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464–476.Google Scholar
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674–698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 37–69.Google Scholar
Uzzi, B. & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447–504.Google Scholar
Valente, T. W. & Foreman, R. K. (1998). Integration and radiality: Measuring the extent of an individual’s connectedness and reachability in a network. Social Networks, 20(1), 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vedres, B. & Stark, D. (2010). Structural folds: Generative disruption in overlapping groups. American Journal of Sociology, 115(4), 1150–1190.Google Scholar
Venkataramani, V. & Dalal, R. S. (2007). Who helps and harms whom? Relational antecedents of interpersonal helping and harming in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 952–966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Venkataramani, V., Zhou, L., Wang, M., Liao, H. & Shi, J. (2016). Social networks and employee voice: The influence of team members’ and team leaders’ social network positions on employee voice. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 132(1), 37–48.Google Scholar
Von Hippel, E. (1994). Sticky information and the locus of problem solving: Implications for innovation. Management Science, 40(4), 429–439.Google Scholar
Wang, C., Rodan, S., Fruin, M. & Xu, X. (2014). Knowledge networks, collaboration networks, and exploratory innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 484–514.Google Scholar
Wang, P. (2013). Exponential random graph model extensions: Models for multiple networks and bipartite networks. In Lusher, D., Koskinen, J. & Robins, G., eds., Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 115–129.Google Scholar
Wang, P., Robins, G., Pattison, P. & Lazega, E. (2013). Exponential random graph models for multilevel networks. Social Network, 35(1), 96–115.Google Scholar
Wasserman, S. & Faust, K. (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watts, D. J. (1999). Networks, dynamics, and the small-world phenomenon. American Journal of Sociology, 105(2), 493–527.Google Scholar
Watts, D. J. & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442.Google Scholar
Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwartz, R. D. & Sechrest, L. (1999). Unobtrusive Measures. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Weeks, M. R., Scott, C., Borgatti, S. P., Radda, K. & Schensul, J. J. (2002). Social networks of drug users in high-risk sites: Finding the connections. AIDS and Behavior, 6(2), 193–206.Google Scholar
Wellman, B. (1979). The community question. American Journal of Sociology, 84(5), 1201–1231.Google Scholar
Wellman, B. (1988). Structural analysis: From method and metaphor to theory and substance. In Wellman, B. & Berkowitz, S. D., eds., Social Structures: A Network Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 19–61.Google Scholar
Wellman, B. & Berkowitz, S. D. (1988). Social Structures: A Network Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
White, H. C., Boorman, S. A. & Breiger, R. L. (1976). Social structures from multiple networks: Blockmodels of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology, 81(4), 730–779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, W. F. (1943). Street Corner Society: The Social Structure of an Italian Slum. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Yakubovich, V. (2005). Weak ties, information, and influence: How workers find jobs in a local Russian labor market. American Sociological Review, 70(3), 408–421.Google Scholar
Young, A. & Hopkins, C. (2015). Semi-automated Processing of Interconnected Dyads using Entity Resolution (SPIDER). National Institutes of Health, Grant #1R43MH106361.Google Scholar
Zachary, W. W. (1977). An information flow model for conflict and fission in small groups. Journal of Anthropological Research, 33(4), 452–473.Google Scholar
Zagenczyk, T. J., Powell, E. E. & Scott, K. L. (2020). How exhausting!? Emotion crossover in organizational social networks. Journal of Management Studies, 57(8), 1589–1609.Google Scholar
Zagenczyk, T. J., Scott, K. D., Gibney, R., Murrell, A. J. & Thatcher, J. B. (2010). Social influence and perceived organizational support: A social networks analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(2), 127–138.Google Scholar
Zheng, X., Zhao, H. H., Liu, X. & Li, N. (2019). Network reconfiguration: The implications of recognizing top performers in teams. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 92(4), 825–847.Google Scholar
Zhou, K. Z., Poppo, L. & Yang, Z. (2008). Relational ties or customized contracts? An examination of alternative governance choices in China. Journal of International Business Studies, 39(3), 526–534.Google Scholar
Zuckerman, E. W. (1999). The categorical imperative: Securities analysts and the illegitimacy discount. American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1398–1438.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 6
- Cited by