Element contents
Series: Elements in American Politics
Converging on Truth
A Dynamic Perspective on Factual Debates in American Public Opinion
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 March 2020
Summary
Much of the science of public opinion focuses on individuals, asking if they perceive or misperceive and why. Often this science will emphasize misperceptions and the psychological processes that produce them. But political debates have outcomes in the aggregate. This Element turns to a more systematic approach, emphasizing whole electorates and examining facts through a dynamic lens. It argues public opinion will converge toward truth over time and frequently finds correct views of facts grow stronger under information flow, while misperception recedes.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in American PoliticsOnline ISBN: 9781108876865Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 09 April 2020
References
Barkun, M. (2013).
A culture of conspiracy: Apocalyptic visions in contemporary America. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bartels, L. M. (2002). Beyond the running tally: Partisan bias in political perceptions.
Political Behavior, 24(2), 117–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, L. M.(2008).
Unequal democracy: The political economy of the new gilded age. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N. (1954).
Voting: A study of opinion formation in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Berinsky, A. J. (2007). Assuming the costs of war: Events, elites, and American public support for military conflict.
The Journal of Politics, 69(4), 975–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brüggemann, M., & Engesser, S. (2017). Beyond false balance: How interpretive journalism shapes media coverage of climate change.
Global Environmental Change, 42, 58–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960).
The American voter. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Coppock, A. E. (2016). Positive, small, homogeneous, and durable: Political persuasion in response to information. Doctoral Dissertation. Columbia University.Google Scholar
Daprile, L. (June 2015). Scott walker says most Americans support voter ID laws, which make it easier to vote. Retrieved from www.politifact.com/Google Scholar
Darwin, C. (1859).
On the origins of species by means of natural selection. London: Murray.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996).
What Americans know about politics and why it matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Derthick, Martha A. (2011). Up in smoke: From legislation to litigation in tobacco politics. Sage.Google Scholar
Durkin, Sarah & Brennan, Emily & Wakefield, Melanie. (2012). Mass media campaigns to promote smoking cessation among adults: an integrative review. Tobacco Control, 21(2), 127–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egan, P. J., & Mullin, M. (2017). Climate change: US public opinion.
Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 209–27.Google Scholar
Faris, R., Roberts, H., Etling, B., Bourassa, N., Zuckerman, E., & Benkler, Y. (2017). Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 us presidential election. Berkman Klein Center for Internet Society Research Paper.Google Scholar
Gaines, B. J., Kuklinski, J. H., Quirk, P. J., Peyton, B., & Verkuilen, J. (2007). Same facts, different interpretations: Partisan motivation and opinion on Iraq.
Journal of Politics, 69(4), 957–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrett, R. K. (2011). Troubling consequences of online political rumoring.
Human Communication Research, 37(2), 255–74.Google Scholar
Gerber, A., & Green, D. P. (1998). Rational learning and partisan attitudes.
American Journal of Political Science, 42(3), 794–818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilens, M. (2001). Political ignorance and collective policy preferences.
American Political Science Review, 95(2), 379–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guess, A., & Coppock, A. (2018). Does counter-attitudinal information cause backlash? Results from three large survey experiments. British Journal of Political Science, 1–19. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123418000327Google Scholar
Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2018). Selective exposure to misinformation: Evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 US presidential campaign.
European Research Council, 9.Google Scholar
Hicks, W. D., McKee, S. C., Sellers, M. D., & Smith, D. A. (2015). A principle or a strategy? Voter identification laws and partisan competition in the American states.
Political Research Quarterly, 68(1), 18–33.Google Scholar
Hill, S. J. (2017). Learning together slowly: Bayesian learning about political facts.
The Journal of Politics, 79(4), 1403–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, J., & Einstein, K. L. (2015a). It isn’t what we don’t know that gives us trouble, it’s what we know that ain’t so: Misinformation and democratic politics.
British Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 467–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochschild, J., & Einstein, K. L.(2015b).
Do facts matter? Information and misinformation in American politics. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, D. J., Sides, J., & Citrin, J. (2019). The muted consequences of correct information about immigration.
The Journal of Politics, 81(1), 315–20.Google Scholar
Ingber, S. (1984). The marketplace of ideas: A legitimizing myth.
Duke Law Journal, 33(1), 6–91.Google Scholar
Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2006). Bankrupt rhetoric: How misleading information affects knowledge about Social Security.
Public Opinion Quarterly, 70(3), 278–303.Google Scholar
Jerit, J., & Barabas, J.(2012). Partisan perceptual bias and the information environment.
The Journal of Politics, 74(3), 672–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly, N. J., & Enns, P. K. (2010). Inequality and the dynamics of public opinion: The self-reinforcing link between economic inequality and mass preferences.
American Journal of Political Science, 54(4), 855–70.Google Scholar
Kuklinski, J. H., & Quirk, P. J. (2000). Reconsidering the rational public: Cognition, heuristics, and mass opinion. Lupia, Arthur & Mathew McCubbins & Samuel Popkin, eds. Elements of reason: Cognition, choice, and the bounds of rationality, 153–82, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning.
Psychological Bulletin, 108(3), 480–98.Google Scholar
Lavine, H. G., Johnston, C. D., & Steenbergen, M. R. (2012).
The ambivalent partisan: How critical loyalty promotes democracy. Oxford University Press, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, J. (2014). A comprehensive investigation of voter impersonation finds 31 credible incidents out of one billion ballots cast. Retrieved from www.washingtonpost.com/news/wonk/wp/2014/08/06/a-comprehensive-investigation-of-voter-impersonation-finds-31-credible-incidents-out-of-one-billion-ballots-cast/Google Scholar
Lupia, A. (2006). How elitism undermines the study of voter competence.
Critical Review, 18(1–3), 217–32.Google Scholar
Lupia, A., & McCubbins, M. D. (1998).
The democratic dilemma: Can citizens learn what they need to know? Cambridge, UK; New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nyhan, Brendan & Reifler, Jason (2010). When Perceptions Fail: The Persistence of Political Misperceptions. Political Behavior, 32(2) 303–330.Google Scholar
Olive, J. K., Hotez, P. J., Damania, A., & Nolan, M. S. (2018). The state of the antivaccine movement in the United States: A focused examination of nonmedical exemptions in states and counties.
PLoS Medicine, 15(6), e1002578.Google Scholar
Page, B. I., & Shapiro, R. Y. (1992).
The rational public: Fifty years of trends in Americans’ policy preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Parker-Stephen, E. (2007). Learning about change: Information, motivation, and political perception. Doctoral Dissertation. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Parker-Stephen, E.(2013). Tides of disagreement: How reality facilitates (and inhibits) partisan public opinion.
The Journal of Politics, 75(4), 1077–88.Google Scholar
Pasek, J., Stark, T. H., Krosnick, J. A., Tompson, T., & Payne, B. K. (2014). Attitudes toward Blacks in the Obama era: Changing distributions and impacts on job approval and electoral choice, 2008–2012.
Public Opinion Quarterly, 78(S1), 276–302.Google Scholar
Petrocik, J. R. (1996). Issue ownership in presidential elections, with a 1980 case study. American Journal of Political Science, 825–50.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. (2017).
Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Prior, M., & Lupia, A. (2008). Money, time, and political knowledge: Distinguishing quick recall and political learning skills.
American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 169–83.Google Scholar
Redlawsk, D. P., Civettini, A. J., & Emmerson, K. M. (2010). The affective tipping point: Do motivated reasoners ever get it?
Political Psychology, 31(4), 563–93.Google Scholar
Sides, J., & Citrin, J. (2007). European opinion about immigration: The role of identities, interests and information.
British Journal of Political Science, 37(3), 477–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, J. A. (2015).
Tides of consent: How public opinion shapes American politics, rev. 2nd ed. New York; London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure.
Political Behavior, 30(3), 341–66.Google Scholar
Taber, C. S., & Lodge, M. (2006). Motivated skepticism in the evaluation of political beliefs.
American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 755–69.Google Scholar
Wood, T., & Porter, E. (2019). The elusive backfire effect: Mass attitudes’ steadfast factual adherence.
Political Behavior, 41(1), 135–63.Google Scholar
Zaller, J. R. (1992).
The nature and origins of mass opinions. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zaller, J., & Feldman, S. (1992). A simple theory of the survey response: Answering questions and revealing preferences.
American Journal of Political Science, 36, 579–616.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 17
- Cited by