Skip to main content
×
×
Home
Cost–Benefit Analysis
This Element is free online for a limited period and available for sale in print.
  • Access
Cost–Benefit Analysis

This Element on cost-benefit analysis provides a summary of recent theoretical and empirical developments and summarizes state-of-the-art stated-preference and revealed-preference valuation methods. The Element discusses how to assess small (or marginal) as well as large (or non-marginal) projects that have a significant impact on prices and/or other economic variables. It also discusses distortions like taxes, market power, and sticky prices. In addition, risk/uncertainty is considered. A novel feature is the elaboration on flexible evaluation rules for reasonably small projects. Conventional point-estimates of projects should be used with care, because they typically give biased results.

  • View HTML
    • Send element to Kindle

      To send this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Cost–Benefit Analysis
      Available formats
      ×
      Send element to Dropbox

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Cost–Benefit Analysis
      Available formats
      ×
      Send element to Google Drive

      To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Cost–Benefit Analysis
      Available formats
      ×
  • Export citation
  • Buy the print element
  • Copyright
  • COPYRIGHT: © Per-Olov Johansson and Bengt Kriström 2018
Arrow, K. J., Cropper, M. L., Gollier, C., et al. (2014). Should governments use a declining discount rate in project analysis? Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8, 145163.
Arrow, K. J., Cropper, M. L., Gollier, C., et al. (2012). How should benefits and costs be discounted in an intergenerational context? Resources for the Future Discussion Paper 1253, Washington, DC, www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-DP-12–53.pdf.
Arrow, K. J., & Fisher, A. C. (1974). Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88, 312319.
Arrow, K., Solow, R., Portney, P. R., et al. (1993). Report of the NOAA Panel on contingent valuation. Federal Register, 58, 46014614.
Ayer, M., Brunk, H. D., Ewing, G. M., Reid, W. T., & Silverman, E. (1955). An empirical distribution function for sampling with incomplete information. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 26, 641647.
Ballard, C. L., & Fullerton, D. (1992). Distortionary taxation and the provision of public goods. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 6, 117131.
Barro, R. J., & Grossman, H. I. (1976). Money, Employment and Inflation, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Becker, G. S. (1960). An economic analysis of fertility. In Roberts, G. B., ed., Demographic and Economic Change in Developed Countries, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 209240.
Belyaev, Y., & Kriström, B. (2015). Analysis of survey data containing rounded censoring intervals. Informatics and Applications, 9, 210.
Blackorby, C., & Donaldson, D. (1990). A review article: The case against the use of the sum of compensating variations in cost–benefit analysis. Canadian Journal of Economics, 23, 471494.
Blanchard, O. J., & Fisher, S. (1996). Lectures on Macroeconomics, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Boadway, R. (2017). Second-best theory: Ageing well at sixty. Pacific Economic Review, 22, 249270.
Boadway, R. (1975). Cost–benefit rules in general equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies, 42, 361374.
Boadway, R. W. (1974). The welfare foundations of cost–benefit analysis. Economic Journal, 84, 926939.
Boadway, R. W., & Bruce, N. (1984). Welfare Economics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Botzen, W. W. J., & van den Bergh, J. C. J. M. 2014. Specifications of social welfare in economic studies of climate policy: Overview of criteria and related policy insights. Environmental and Resource Economics, 58, 133.
Boyle, G., & Irwin, T. (2004). A Primer on Real Options, Wellington: New Zealand Institute for the Study of Competition and Regulation.
Carson, R. T. (2012). Contingent Valuation: A Comprehensive Bibliography and History, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Carson, R. T., & Groves, T. (2011). Incentive and information properties of preference questions: Commentary and extensions. In Bennett, J., ed., The International Handbook on Non-Market Environmental Valuation, Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar, pp. 300321.
Carson, R. T., & Groves, T. (2007). Incentive and informational properties of preference questions. Environmental and Resource Economics, 37, 181210.
Chay, K. Y., & Greenstone, M. (2005). Does air quality matter? Evidence from the housing market. Journal of Political Economy, 113, 376424.
Coelli, T., Lloyd-Smith, J., Morrison, D., & Thomas, J. (1991). Hedonic pricing for a cost benefit analysis of a public water supply scheme. The Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 35, 120.
Cuddington, J. T., Johansson, P.-O., & Löfgren, K.-G. (1984). Disequilibrium Macroeconomics in Open Economies, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Dahlby, B. (2008). The Marginal Cost of Public Funds. Theory and Applications, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
de Blaeij, A., Florax, R. J. G. M., Rietveld, P., & Verhoef, E. (2003). The value of statistical life in road safety: A meta-analysis. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35, 973986.
de Rus, G. (2010). Introduction to Cost–Benefit Analysis. Looking for Reasonable Shortcuts, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Dietz, S., & Hepburn, C. (2013). Benefit–cost analysis of non-marginal climate and energy projects. Energy Economics, 40, 6171.
Dixit, A. K., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under Uncertainty, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Dolan, P., & Tsuchiya, A. (2011). Determining the parameters in social welfare function using stated preference data: An application to health. Applied Economics, 42, 22412250.
Drèze, J., & Stern, N. (1987). The Theory of Cost–Benefit Analysis. In Auerbach, A. and Feldstein, M., eds., Handbook in Public Economics, Vol. II, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 909990.
Dupuit, J. (1849). De l’influence des péages sur l’utilité des voies de communication. Annales des Ponts et Chaussées, 207, 170248.
Eppen, G. D., Gould, F. J., & Schmidt, C. P. (1993). Introductory Management Science, 4th edn., Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall International.
European Commission. (2014). Guide to Cost–Benefit Analysis of Investment Projects: Economic Appraisal Tool for Cohesion Policy 2014–2020, Brussels: Tech. rept. DG Regional Policy.
Fisher, A. C., & Hanemann, M. W. (1987). Quasi-option value: Some misconceptions dispelled. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 14, 183190.
Florio, M. (2014). Applied Welfare Economics. Cost–Benefit Analysis of Projects and Policies, New York: Routledge.
Florio, M., Forte, S., & Sirtori, E. (2016). Forecasting the socio-economic impact of the Large Hadron Collider: A cost–benefit analysis to 2025 and beyond. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 112, 3853.
Freeman III, A. M., Heriges, J. A., & Kling, C. L. (2014). The Measurement of Environmental and Resource Values. Theories and Methods, 3rd edn., New York: RFF Press.
Gahvari, F. (2006). On the marginal cost of public funds and the optimal provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics, 90, 12511262.
Gollier, C., & Weitzman, M. L. (2010). How should the distant future be discounted when discount rates are uncertain? Economics Letters, 107, 350353.
Graham, D. A. (1981). Cost–benefit analysis under uncertainty. American Economic Review, 715725.
Griliches, Z. (ed.). (1971). Price Indexes and Quality Change, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Gustafsson, A., Herrmann, A., & Huber, F. (eds.) (2007). Conjoint Measurement. Methods and Applications, 4th edn., Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Harberger, A. C. (1971). Three basic postulates for applied welfare economics: An interpretive essay. Journal of Economic Literature, 9, 785797.
Harrison, M. (2010). Valuing the future: The social discount rate in cost–benefit analysis. Visiting Researcher Paper, Productivity Commission, Canberra, AUS, http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract\id=1599963.
Henry, C. (1974). Investment decisions under uncertainty: The irreversibility effect. American Economic Review, 64, 10061012.
Hicks, J. R. (1939). The foundations of welfare economics. The Economic Journal, 49, 696712.
HM Treasury. (2011). The Green Book. Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, London: HMSO.
Hotelling, H. (1949). Letter of June 18, 1947, to Newton B. Drury. Tech. rep., Included in the report The Economics of Public Recreation: An Economic Study of the Monetary Evaluation of Recreation in the National Parks.
Jehle, G. A., & Reny, P. J. (2011). Advanced Microeconomic Theory, 3rd edn., Harlow: Financial Times Prentice Hall.
Johansson, P.-O. (1982). Cost–benefit rules in general disequilibrium. Journal of Public Economics, 18, 121137.
Johansson, P.-O., & Kriström, B. (2017). General equilibrium welfare evaluation in the small and in the large: Application to green certificate schemes. Mimeo.
Johansson, P.-O., & Kriström, B. (2017a). Rule of half as the outcome of utility maximization. Mimeo.
Johansson, P.-O., & Kriström, B. (2016). Cost–Benefit Analysis for Project Appraisal, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Johansson, P.-O., & Kriström, B. (2015). On the social cost of water-related disasters. Water Economics and Policy, 1 (https://doi.org/10.1142/S2382624X15500150).
Johansson, P. O., & Kriström, B. (2012). The Economics of Evaluating Water Projects. Hydroelectricity versus Other Uses. Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
Johansson, P.-O., Kriström, B., & Böhringer, C. (2017). General equilibrium welfare evaluation of green certificate schemes in the small. Mimeo.
Johnston, R. J., Boyle, K. J., Ademowicz, W., et al. (2017). Contemporary guidance for stated preference studies. Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 4, 319405.
Jorge-Calderón, D., & Johansson, P.-O. (2017). Emissions trading and taxes: An application to airport investment appraisals. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 51, 249265.
Just, R. E., Hueth, D. L., & Schmitz, A. (2004). The Welfare Economics of Public Policy: A Practical Approach to Project and Policy Evaluation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Kaldor, N. (1939). Welfare propositions of economics and interpersonal comparisons of utility. The Economic Journal, 49, 549552.
Knight, F. H. (1921). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit, Boston, MA: Houghton and Mifflin.
Kriström, B., & Johansson, P.-O. (2015). Economic valuation methods for non-market goods or services. In Wohl, E., ed., Oxford Bibliographies in Environmental Science, New York: Oxford University Press. DOI:10.1093/OBO/9780199363445-0044.
Kriström, B., & Laitila, T. (2003). Choice experiments: A user’s guide. In Folmer, H. and Tietenberg, T., eds., Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 305330.
Lancaster, K. (1971). Consumer Demand: A New Approach, New York: Columbia University Press.
Lancaster, K. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132157.
Lesourne, J. (1975). Cost–Benefit Analysis and Economic Theory, Amsterdam: North-Holland.
Lesourne, J. (1972). Le Calcul Économique: Théorie et Applications, 2nd edn., Paris: Dunod.
Lindhjem, H., Navrud, S., Braathen, N. A., & Biausque, V. (2011). Valuing mortality risk reductions from environmental, transport, and health policies: A global meta-analysis of stated preference studies. Risk Analysis, 31, 13811407.
Loureiro, M. L., & Loomis, J. B. (2013). International public preferences and provision of public goods: Assessment of passive use values in large oil spills. Environmental and Resource Economics, 56, 521534.
Louviere, J. J., Flynn, T. N., & Carson, R. T. (2010). Discrete choice experiments are not conjoint analysis. Journal of Choice Modelling, 3, 5772.
Luce, R. D., & Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 127.
Mahieu, P.-A., Riera, P., Kriström, B., Brännlund, R., & Giergiczny, M. (2014). Exploring the determinants of uncertainty in contingent valuation surveys. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3, 186200.
Mäler, K.-G. (2002). Are social welfare functions ordinal or cardinal? Beijer Discussion Paper Series No. 148, Stockholm: The Beijer Institute of Ecological Economics.
Mäler, K.-G. (1985). Welfare Economics and the Environment. In Kneese, A. V. and Sweeney, J. L., eds., Handbook of Natural Resource and Energy Economics, vol. 1, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 360.
Mäler, K.-G. (1974). Environmental Economics: A Theoretical Inquiry. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press for Resources for the Future.
McAllister, P. H., Stone, J. C., & Dantzig, G. B. (1989). Deriving a utility function for the U.S. economy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 11, 391429.
Mensink, P., & Requate, T. (2005). The Dixit–Pindyck and the Arrow–Fisher-Hanemann–Henry option values are not equivalent: A note on Fisher (2000). Resource and Energy Economics, 27, 8388.
Milgrom, P. (1993). Is sympathy an economic value? Philosophy, economics and the contingent valuation method. In Hausman, J. A., ed., Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 417435.
Myles, G. D. (1995). Public Economics, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Palmquist, R. B. (2005). Weak complementarity, path independence, and the intuition of the Willig condition. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 49, 103115.
Pareto, V. (1896–1897). Premier Cours d’Économie Politique Appliquée Professé à l’Université de Lausanne, Paris: Rouge/Pichon.
Parsons, G. R. (2013). Travel cost methods. In Shogren, J. F., ed., Encyclopedia of Energy, Natural Resource, and Environmental Economics, Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 349358.
Phelps, E. S., & Pollak, R. A. (1968). On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. Review of Economic Studies, 35, 185199.
Quinet, É. (2013). Cost benefit assessment of public investments. Final report. Summary and recommendations. Paris: Commissariat general à la stratégie et à la prospective.
Robinson, L. A., & Hammitt, J. K. (2011). Behavioral economics and the conduct of benefit–cost analysis: Towards principles and standards. Journal of Benefit–Cost Analysis, 2, (2), art. 5.
Rosen, S. (1988). The value of changes in life expectancy. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 1, 285304.
Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: Product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 3455.
Ruiz-Castillo, J. (1987). Potential welfare and the sum of individual compensating or equivalent variations. Journal of Economic Theory, 41, 3453.
Saez, E., & Stantcheva, S. (2016). Generalized social marginal welfare weights for optimal tax theory. American Economic Review, 106, 2445.
Smith, V. K. (1991). Household production functions and environmental benefit estimation. In Braden, J. B. and Kolstad, C. D., eds., Measuring the Demand for Environmental Quality, Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp. 4176.
Smith, V. K., & Moore, E. M. (2010). Behavioral economics and benefit cost analysis. Environmental and Resource Economics, 46, 217234.
Stern, N. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change. The Stern Review, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stigler, S. M. (1980). Stigler’s law of eponymy. Transactions of the New York Academy of Sciences, 39, 147157.
Strotz, R. H. (1955–1956). Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization. Review of Economic Studies, 23, 165180.
Traeger, C. P. (2014). On option values in environmental and resource economics. Resource and Energy Economics, 37, 242252.
US EPA. (2010). Guidelines for preparing economic analyses. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Updated May 2014, Washington, DC: EPA 240-R–00–003.
Viscusi, W. K. (2015). The heterogeneity of the value of statistical life: Evidence and policy implications. In Mansfield, C. and Smith, V. K., eds., Benefit–Cost Analyses for Security Policies. Does Increased Safety Have to Reduce Efficiency? Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 78116.
Weimer, D. L. (2017). Behavioral Economics for Cost–Benefit Analysis. Benefit Validity When Sovereign Consumers Seem to Make Mistakes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whittington, D., & MacRae, D. Jr. (1986). The issue of standing in cost–benefit analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 5, 665682.
Yunker, J. A. (1989). Some empirical evidence on the social welfare maximization hypothesis. Public Finance, 44, 110133.

We are grateful to the editors of the Cambridge Elements series in Public Economics, Professors Robin Boadway, Frank Cowell, and Massimo Florio, and the Associate Editor Dr. Chiara Del Bo for their generous support. Two anonymous reviewers provided us with detailed and very constructive comments. However, any remaining errors and other flaws are our own responsibility.

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed