Element contents
Deliberative Global Governance
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 08 July 2019
Summary
Global institutions are afflicted by severe democratic deficits, while many of the major problems facing the world remain intractable. Against this backdrop, we develop a deliberative approach that puts effective, inclusive, and transformative communication at the heart of global governance. Multilateral negotiations, international organizations and regimes, governance networks, and scientific assessments can be rendered more deliberative and democratic. More thoroughgoing transformations could involve citizens' assemblies, nested forums, transnational mini-publics, crowdsourcing, and a global dissent channel. The deliberative role of global civil society is vital. We show how different institutional and civil society elements can be linked to good effect in a global deliberative system. The capacity of deliberative institutions to revise their own structures and processes means that deliberative global governance is not just a framework but also a reconstructive learning process. A deliberative approach can advance democratic legitimacy and yield progress on global problems such as climate change, violent conflict and poverty.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108762922Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 11 July 2019
References
Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan. 2010. International Regulation without International Government: Improving IO Performance through Orchestration. Review of International Organizations 5: 315–344.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce A. 1991. We the People I: Foundations. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aitamurto, Tanja and Landemore, Hélène. 2016. Crowdsourced Deliberation: The Case of the Law on Off-Road Traffic in Finland. Policy and Internet 8 (2): 174–196.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham T. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston, MA: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen J. and Meunier, Sophie. 2009. The Politics of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 13–24.Google Scholar
Andrieu, Kora. 2010. Civilizing Peacebuilding: Transitional Justice, Civil Society, and the Liberal Paradigm. Security Dialogue 41 (5): 537–558.Google Scholar
Avant, Deborah, Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K.. 2010. Who Governs the Global? In Who Governs the Globe?, ed. Avant, Deborah, Finnemore, Martha, and Sell, Susan K., pp. 1–31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baber, Walter F. and Bartlett, Robert V.. 2015. Consensus and Global Environmental Governance: Deliberative Democracy in Nature’s Regime. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bäckstrand, Karin, Kuyper, Jonathan W., Linnér, Björn-Ola, and Eva, Lövbrand. 2017. Non-State Actors in Global Climate Governance: From Copenhagen to Paris and Beyond. Environmental Politics 26 (6): 561–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Michael. 2006. Building a Republican Peace: Stabilizing States after War. International Security 30 (4): 87–112.Google Scholar
Barvosa, Edwina. 2018. Deliberative Democracy Now: LGBT Equality and the Emergence of Large-Scale Deliberative Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beck, Silke, Borie, Maud, Chilvers, Jason, Esguerra, Alejandro, Heubach, Katja, Hulme, Mike, Lidskog, Rolf, Lövbrand, Eva, Marquard, Elisabeth, Miller, Clark, Nadim, Tahani, Neßhöver, Carsten, Settele, Josef, Turnhout, Esther, Vasileiadou, Eleftheria, and Christoph, Görg. 2014. Towards a Reflexive Turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise: The Cases of the IPCC and the IPBES. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 23 (2): 80–87.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1996. Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy. In Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political, ed. Benhabib, Seyla, pp. 67–94. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2006. Global Legal Pluralism. Southern California Law Review 80: 1155–1237.Google Scholar
Bevir, Mark and Bowman, Quinlan. 2011. Innovations in Democratic Governance. In Innovations in Public Governance, ed. Anttiroiko, Ari-Veikko, Bailey, Stephen J., and Valkama, Pekka, pp. 174–193. Amsterdam: IOS Press.Google Scholar
Bienkov, Adam. 2012. Astroturfing: What Is It and Why Does It Matter? The Guardian. February 9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, Simon, Bodin, Örjan, and Annica, Sandström. 2015. Tracing the Sources of Legitimacy: The Impact of Deliberation in Participatory Natural Resource Management. Policy Sciences 48 (4): 443–461.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 2012. Jus post bellum as a Deliberative Process: Transnationalising Peace-Building. Irish Journal of Sociology 20(2): 10–27.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John. 2015. Deliberative Republican Hybridity through Restorative Justice. Raisons Politques 3 (59): 39–45.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John and Gohar, Ali. 2014. Restorative Justice, Policing and Insurgency: Learning from Pakistan. Law and Society Review 48 (3): 531–561.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, John and Nickson, Ray. 2012. Timing Truth, Reconciliation, and Justice after War. Ohio State Journal of Dispute Resolution 27 (3): 443–476.Google Scholar
Buchanan, Allen. 2004. Justice, Legitimacy, and Self-Determination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cabrera, Luis. 2004. Political Theory of Global Justice: A Cosmopolitan Case for the World State. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Call, Charles T. and Cook, Susan E.. 2003. On Democratization and Peacebuilding. Global Governance 9: 233–246.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone. 2004. Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation. Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (4): 389–410.Google Scholar
Chambers, Simone and Kopstein, Jeffrey. 2001. Bad Civil Society. Political Theory 29 (6): 837–865.Google Scholar
Chasek, Pamela S, Wagner, Lynn M., Leone, Faye, Lebada, Anna-Maria, and Risse, Natalie. 2016. Getting to 2030: Negotiating the Post-2015 Sustainable Development Agenda. Review of European, Comparative and International Law 25 (1): 5–14.Google Scholar
Clauset, Aaron. 2018. Trends and Fluctuations in the Severity of Interstate Wars. Science Advances 4 (2): 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, Stephen and Moss, Giles. 2012. Under Construction: The Field of Online Deliberation Research. Journal of Information Technology and Politics 9: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crosby, Ted and Nethercut, Doug. 2005. Citizens Juries: Creating a Trustworthy Voice of the People. In The Deliberative Democracy Handbook: Strategies for Effective Citizen Engagement in the 21st Century, ed. Gastil, John and Levine, Peter, pp. 111–119. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Curato, Nicole, Hammond, Marit, and Min, John. 2019. Power in Deliberative Democracy: Norms, Forums, Systems. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Dingwerth, Klaus, Schmidtke, Henning, Weise, Tobias, and Wodarz, Jonas. 2015. Speaking Democracy: Why International Organizations Adopt a Democratic Rhetoric. Paper presented at ECPR Joint Sessions, Warsaw.Google Scholar
Dorsch, Marcel and Flachsland, Christian. 2017. A Polycentric Approach to Global Climate Governance. Global Environmental Politics 17 (2): 45–64.Google Scholar
Drezner, Daniel W. 2009. The Power and Peril of International Regime Complexity. Perspectives on Politics 7 (1): 65–70.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2006. Deliberative Global Politics: Discourse and Democracy in a Divided World. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2010. Foundations and Frontiers of Deliberative Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2012. Global Civil Society: The Progress of Post-Westphalian Politics. Annual Review of Political Science 15: 101–119.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2013. The Deliberative Democrat’s Idea of Justice. European Journal of Political Theory 12: 329–346.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S., Bächtiger, André, and Milewicz, Karolina. 2011. Toward a Deliberative Global Citizens’ Assembly. Global Policy 2: 33–42.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. and Niemeyer, Simon. 2006. Reconciling Pluralism and Consensus as Political Ideals. American Journal of Political Science 50 (3): 634–649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dryzek, John S. and Pickering, Jonathan. 2017. Deliberation as a Catalyst for Reflexive Environmental Governance. Ecological Economics 131: 353–360.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. and Pickering, Jonathan. 2019. The Politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon. 1998. Deliberation and Constitution Making. In Deliberative Democracy, ed. Elster, Jon, pp. 97–122. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Elster, Jon, Offe, Claus, and Preuss, Ulrich K.. 1998. Institutional Design in Post-Communist Countries: Rebuilding the Ship at Sea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Encarnación, Omar G. 2014. Democracy without Justice in Spain: The Politics of Forgetting. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Esaiasson, Peter, Gilljam, Mikael, and Persson, Mikael. 2017. Responsiveness Beyond Policy Satisfaction: Does It Matter to Citizens? Comparative Political Studies 50 (6): 739–765.Google Scholar
Evans, Peter and Finnemore, Martha. 2001. Organizational Reform and the Expansion of the South’s Voice at the Fund. G-24 Discussion Paper Series, No.15, Harvard University.Google Scholar
Falk, Richard and Strauss, Andrew, eds. 2011. A Global Parliament: Essays and Articles. Berlin: Committee for a Democratic U.N.Google Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn. 1998. International Norm Dynamics and Political Change. International Organization 52 (4): 887–917.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James. 1995. The Voice of the People: Public Opinion and Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James. 2009. When the People Speak: Deliberative Democracy and Public Consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James. 2018. Democracy When the People are Thinking: Revitalizing our Politics through Public Deliberation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Forstater, Maya. 2015. Can Stopping ‘Tax Dodging’ by Multinational Enterprises Close the Gap in Development Finance? Washington, DC: Center for Global Development, Policy Paper 69.Google Scholar
Franks, Max, Lessmann, Kai, Jakob, Michael, Steckel, Jan Christoph, and Edenhofer, Ottmar. 2018. Mobilizing Domestic Resources for the Agenda 2030 via Carbon Pricing. Nature Sustainability 1 (7): 350–357.Google Scholar
Galaz, Victor, Crobna, Beatrice, Österblom, Henrik, Olsson, Per, and Folke, Carl. 2012. Polycentric Systems and Interacting Planetary Boundaries. Ecological Economics 81: 21–32.Google Scholar
Gellers, Joshua C. 2016. Crowdsourcing Global Governance: Sustainable Development Goals, Civil Society, and the Pursuit of Democratic Legitimacy. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 16 (3): 415–432.Google Scholar
Gettleman, Jeffrey. 2017. State Dept. Dissent Cable on Trump’s Ban Draws 1,000 Signatures. New York Times, 31 January. www.nytimes.com/2017/01/31/world/americas/state-dept-dissent-cable-trump-immigration-order.html accessed 3 June 2019.Google Scholar
Gilabert, Pablo and Lawford-Smith, Holly. 2012. Political Feasibility: A Conceptual Exploration. Political Studies 60 (4): 809–825.Google Scholar
Goodin, Robert E. 2010. Global Democracy: In the Beginning. International Theory 2 (2): 175–209.Google Scholar
Grant, Ruth W. and Keohane, Robert O.. 2005. Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics. American Political Science Review 99 (1): 29–43.Google Scholar
Grönlund, Kimmo, Bächtiger, André, and Setälä, Maija, eds. 2014. Deliberative Mini-Publics: Involving Citizens in the Democratic Process. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Gurman, Hannah. 2011. The Other Plumbers Unit: The Dissent Channel of the U.S. State Department. Diplomatic History 35 (2): 321–349.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Haas, Peter M. 1992. Banning Chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic Community Efforts to Protect Stratospheric Ozone. International Organization 46 (1): 187–224.Google Scholar
Hale, Thomas. 2016. “All Hands on Deck”: The Paris Agreement and Nonstate Climate Action. Global Environmental Politics 16 (3): 12–22.Google Scholar
Hardt, Michael and Negri, Antonio. 2001. Empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Harris, Paul G. 2011. Reconceptualizing Global Governance. In The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, ed. Dryzek, John S., Norgaard, Richard B., and Schlosberg, David, pp. 639–652. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartz-Karp, Janette, Anderson, Patrick, Gastil, John, and Felicetti, Andrea. 2010. The Australian Citizens’ Parliament: Forging Shared Identity through Public Deliberation. Journal of Public Affairs 10 (4): 353–71.Google Scholar
Hébert, Martin. 2018. Indigenous Spheres of Deliberation. In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, ed. André Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Warren, Mark E., pp. 100–111. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Held, David and Fane-Hervey, Angus. 2011. Democracy, Climate Change, and Global Governance: Democratic Agency and the Policy Menu Ahead. In The Governance of Climate Change: Science, Politics and Ethics, ed. Held, David, Theros, Marika, and Fane-Hervey, Angus, pp. 89–110. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Hendriks, Carolyn M. 2008. On Inclusion and Network Governance: The Democratic Disconnect of Dutch Energy Transitions. Public Administration 86 (4): 1009–31.Google Scholar
Henrich, Joseph, Boyd, Robert, Bowles, Samuel, Camerer, Colin, Fehr, Ernst, and Gintis, Herbert. 2004. Foundations of Human Sociality: Economic Experiments and Ethnographic Evidence from Fifteen Small-Scale Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Higgott, Richard and Erman, Eva. 2010. Deliberative Global Governance and the Question of Legitimacy: What Can we learn from the WTO? Review of International Studies 36: 449–470.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Matthew J. 2011. Climate Governance at the Crossroads: Experimenting with a Global Response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopmann, P. Terrence. 1995. Two Paradigms of Negotiation: Bargaining and Problem Solving. ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 542 (1): 24–47.Google Scholar
Howard, Jo and Wheeler, Joanna. 2015. What Community Development and Citizen Participation Should Contribute to the New Global Framework for Sustainable Development. Community Development Journal 50 (4): 552–570.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel P. 1996. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
IEO (Independent Evaluation Office). 2011. IMF Performance in the Run-Up to the Financial and Economic Crisis: IMF Surveillance in 2004–2007. www.ieo-imf.org/ieo/files/completedevaluations/crisis-%20main%20report%20(without%20moises%20signature).pdf accessed 12 July 2018.Google Scholar
Ikenberry, G. John. 2009. After Victory: Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Rebuilding of Order after Major Wars. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Internet World Stats. 2018. www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm accessed 13 July 2018.Google Scholar
Neusner, Jacob and Chilton, Bruce, eds. 2009. The Golden Rule: The Ethics of Reciprocity in World Religions. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kahneman, Daniel. 2018. Daniel Kahneman on Misery, Memory, And Our Understanding Of The Mind. www.npr.org/templates/transcript/transcript.php?storyId=592986190&t=1552733303316 accessed 15 March 2019.Google Scholar
Kaldor, Mary. 2003. The Idea of Global Civil Society. International Affairs 79: 583–593.Google Scholar
Kamau, Macharia, Chasek, Pamela, and O’Connor, David. 2018. Transforming Multilateral Diplomacy: The Inside Story of the Sustainable Development Goals. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. 2015. Nominal Democracy? Prospects for Democratic Global Governance. International Journal of Constitutional Law 13 (2): 343–353.Google Scholar
Keohane, . Robert, O., and Nye, Joseph S.. 1977. Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition. Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Keohane, Robert O. and Victor, David G.. 2011. The Regime Complex for Climate Change. Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 7–23.Google Scholar
Krasner, Stephen D. 1983. International Regimes. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico. 2010. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kuper, Andrew. 2002. More than Charity: Cosmopolitan Alternatives to the “Singer Solution.” Ethics and International Affairs 16: 107–120.Google Scholar
Kuyper, Jonathan W. 2014. Global Democratization and International Regime Complexity. European Journal of International Relations 20 (3): 620–646.Google Scholar
Kuyper, Jonathan W. and Dryzek, John S.. 2016. Real, Not Nominal, Global Democracy: A Reply to Robert Keohane. International Journal of Constitutional Law 14 (4): 930–937.Google Scholar
Kuziemko, Ilyana and Werker, Eric. 2006. How Much Is a Seat on the Security Council Worth? Foreign Aid and Bribery at the United Nations. Journal of Political Economy 114 (5): 905–930.Google Scholar
Landemore, Hélène. 2013. Democratic Reason: Politics, Collective Intelligence, and the Rule of the Many. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Landemore, Hélène. 2015. Inclusive Constitution-Making: The Icelandic Experiment. Journal of Political Philosophy 23 (2): 166–191.Google Scholar
Landwehr, Claudia. 2015. Democratic Meta-Deliberation: Towards Reflective Institutional Design. Political Studies 63 (S1): 38–54.Google Scholar
Lederach, John Paul. 1997. Building Peace: Sustainable Reconciliation in Divided Societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
Lowi, Theodore J. 1999. Frontyard Propaganda: A Response to “Beyond Backyard Environmentalism”. Boston Review. October 1.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Rhona. 2005. How Women Were Affected by the Tsunami: A Perspective from Oxfam. PLoS Med 2 (6): e178.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Michael K. and Warren, Mark E.. 2012. Two Trust-Based Uses of Mini Publics in Democratic Systems. In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, ed. Parkinson, John and Mansbridge, Jane, pp. 95–124. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2009. A “Selection Model” of Political Representation. Journal of Political Philosophy 17 (4): 369–398.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, Estlund, David, Føllesdal, Andreas, Fung, Archon, Lafont, Cristina, Manin, Bernard, and Martí, José Luis. 2010. The Place of Power and the Role of Self-Interest in Deliberative Democracy. Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 64–100.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane, Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, Christiano, Thomas, Fung, Archon, Parkinson, John, Thompson, Dennis F., and Warren, Mark E.. 2012. A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy. In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, ed. Parkinson, John and Mansbridge, Jane, pp. 1–26. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mendeloff, David. 2004. Truth-Seeking, Truth-Telling, and Post-Conflict Peacebuilding: Curb the Enthusiasm? International Studies Review 6 (3): 355–380.Google Scholar
Milewicz, Karolina and Goodin, Robert. 2018. Deliberative Capacity Building through International Organizations: The Case of the Universal Periodic Review of Human Rights. British Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 513–533.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Ian, Käppeli, Anita, and Hillebrandt, Hauke. 2017. Commitment to Development Index 2017. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development. Available at: www.cgdev.org/publication/commitment-development-index-2017 accessed 3 June 2019.Google Scholar
Montanaro, Laura. 2018. Who Elected Oxfam? A Democratic Defence of Self-Appointed Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moser, Susanne C. and Dilling, Lisa. 2011. Communicating Climate Change: Closing the Science-Action Gap. In The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society, ed. Dryzek, John S., Norgaard, Richard B., and Schlosberg, David, pp. 161–174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Muzaka, Valbona. 2010. Linkages, Contests and Overlaps in the Global Intellectual Property Rights Regime. European Journal of International Relations 17 (4): 755–776.Google Scholar
Narayan, Deepa, Patel, Raj, Schafft, Kai, Rademacher, Anne, and Koch-Schulte, Sarah. 2000. Voices of the Poor: Can Anyone Hear Us? New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
NASA et al. 1986. Atmospheric Ozone, 1985. World Meteorological Organization Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project Report 16. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization.Google Scholar
Neumayer, Eric and Thomas, Plümper. 2007. The Gendered Nature of Natural Disasters: The Impact of Catastrophic Events on the Gender Gap in Life Expectancy, 1981–2002. Annals of the American Association of Geographers 97 (3): 551–566.Google Scholar
Norgaard, Richard B. 2008. Finding Hope in the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Conservation Biology 22 (4): 862–869.Google Scholar
Nye, Joseph S. 2001. Globalization’s Democratic Deficit: How to Make International Institutions More Accountable. Foreign Affairs 80 (4): 2–6.Google Scholar
Odell, John. S. 2000. Negotiating the World Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
O’Flynn, Ian. 2017. Pulling Together: Shared Intentions, Deliberative Democracy and Deeply Divided Societies. British Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 187–202.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1982. The Rise and Decline of Nations. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Omelicheva, Mariya Y. 2009. Global Civil Society and Democratization of World Politics: A Bona Fide Relationship or Illusory Liaison? International Studies Review 11 (1): 109–132.Google Scholar
Oreskes, Naomi and Conway, Erik M.. 2010. Defeating the Merchants of Doubt. Nature 465: 686–687.Google Scholar
Ostrom, Elinor. 2010. Polycentric Systems for Coping with Collective Action and Global Environmental Change. Global Environmental Change 20 (4): 550–557.Google Scholar
Panke, Diana. 2014. The UNGA—a Talking Shop? Exploring Rationales for the Repetition of Resolutions in Subsequent Negotiations. Cambridge Review of International Affairs 27 (3): 442–458.Google Scholar
Parkinson, John and Mansbridge, Jane, eds. 2012. Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Parkinson, John and Roche, Declan. 2004. Restorative Justice: Deliberative Democracy in Action? Australian Journal of Political Science 39 (3): 505–518.Google Scholar
Peltzer, Karl, Niang, Cheikh I., Muula, Adamson S., Bowa, Kasonde, Okeke, Linus, Boiro, Hamadou, and Chimbwete, Chiweni. 2007. Editorial Review: Male Circumcision, Gender and HIV Prevention in Sub-Saharan Africa: A (Social Science) Research Agenda. Journal of Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS 4 (7): 658–667.Google Scholar
Peters, Anne. 2009. The Merits of Global Constitutionalism. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies 16 (2): 397–411.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rao, Vijayendra and Sanyal, Paromita. 2010. Dignity through Discourse: Poverty and the Culture of Deliberation in Indian Village Democracies. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 629: 146–172.Google Scholar
Rask, Mikko, Worthington, Richard, and Lammi, Minna, eds. 2012. Citizen Participation in Global Environmental Governance. Abingdon: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Rathi, Akshat. 2015. This Simple Negotiation Tactic Brought 195 Countries to Consensus. Quartz https://qz.com/572623/this-simple-negotiation-tactic-brought-195-countries-to-consensus-in-the-paris-climate-talks/ accessed 27 August 2018.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R. and Goodin, Robert E.. 2011. Democratizing International Law. Global Policy 2: 241–247.Google Scholar
Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David G.. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 58 (2): 277–309.Google Scholar
Reinhard, Janine, Biesenbender, Jan, and Holzinger, Katharina. 2014. Do Arguments Matter? Argumentation and Negotiation Success at the 1997 Amsterdam Intergovernmental Conference. European Political Science Review 6 (2): 283–307.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R.A.W. 1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Riddervold, Marianne. 2011. From Reason-Giving to Collective Action: Argument-Based Learning and European Integration. Cooperation and Conflict 46 (4): 563–580.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas. 2000. Let’s Argue! Communicative Action in World Politics. International Organization 54 (1): 1–39.Google Scholar
Sass, Jensen and Dryzek, John S.. 2014. Deliberative Cultures. Political Theory 42 (1): 3–25.Google Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank. 2001. The Community Trap: Liberal Norms, Rhetorical Action, and the Eastern Enlargement of the European Union. International Organization 55 (1): 47–80.Google Scholar
Scholte, Jan Aart. 2002. Civil Society and Democracy in Global Governance. Global Governance 8(3): 281–304.Google Scholar
Scholte, Jan Aart. 2016. Relations with Civil Society. In The Oxford Handbook of International Organizations, ed. Cogan, Jacob Katz, Hurd, Ian, and Johnstone, Ian, pp. 712–29. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schrader, Christopher. 2018. Climate Talk: Tales of Hunger and of Hope. Yale Climate Connections https://www.yaleclimateconnections.org/2018/08/climate-talk-tales-of-hunger-and-of-hope/ accessed 22 August 2018.Google Scholar
Sénit, Carole‐Anne, Biermann, Frank, and Kalfagianni, Agni. 2017. The Representativeness of Global Deliberation: a Critical Assessment of Civil Society Consultations for Sustainable Development. Global Policy 8 (1): 62–72.Google Scholar
Shalom, Stephen. 2005. ParPolity: Political Vision for a Good Society. ZNet online: https://zcomm.org/znetarticle/parpolity-political-vision-for-a-good-society-by-stephen1-shalom/ accessed 3 June 2019.Google Scholar
Singh, J.P. 2015. Global Institutions and Deliberations: Is the World Trade Organization More Participatory than UNESCO? In Deliberation and Development: Rethinking the Role of Voice and Collective Action in Unequal Societies, ed. Heller, Patrick and Rao, Vijayendra, pp. 192–222. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Smith, Graham. 2009. Democratic Innovations: Designing Institutions for Citizen Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, William. 2018. Transnational and Global Deliberation. In The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy, ed. André Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Warren, Mark E., pp. 856–868. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sommerer, Thomas and Tallberg, Jonas. 2017. Transnational Access to International Organizations 1950–2010: A New Data Set. International Studies Perspectives 18 (3): 247–266.Google Scholar
Steffek, Jens. 2010. Public Accountability and the Public Sphere of International Governance. Ethics and International Affairs 24 (1): 45–67.Google Scholar
Steffek, Jens and Nanz, Patrizia. 2008. Emergent Patterns of Civil Society Participation in Global and European Governance. In Civil Society Participation in European and Global Governance, ed. Steffek, Jens, Kissling, Claudia, and Nanz, Patrizia, pp. 1–29. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Steiner, Jürg, Jaramillo, Maria Clara, Maia, Rousiley C.M., and Mameli, Simona. 2017. Deliberation Across Deeply Divided Societies: Transformative Moments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Hayley. 2013. Governing Climate Technologies: Is There Room for Democracy? Environmental Values 22 (5): 567–587.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Hayley. 2016. The Wisdom of the Many in Global Environmental Governance. International Studies Quarterly 60 (3): 400–412.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Hayley and Dryzek, John S.. 2014. Democratizing Global Climate Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stirling, Andy. 2008. “Opening up” and “Closing Down”: Power, Participation, and Pluralism in the Social Appraisal of Technology. Science, Technology and Human Values 33 (2): 262–294.Google Scholar
Stoker, Gerry. 2006. Public Value Management: A New Narrative for Networked Governance? American Review of Public Administration 36: 41–57.Google Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas, Sommerer, Thomas, Squatrito, Theresa, and Christer, Jönsson. 2013. The Opening Up of International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
UN. 2004. The Rule of Law and Transitional Justice in Conflict and Post-Conflict Societies: Report of the Secretary-General. Available at: www.un.org/ruleoflaw/files/2004%20report.pdf. accessed 3 June 2019.Google Scholar
UNFCCC 2014. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in Geological Formations as CDM Project Activities. http://cdm.unfccc.int/about/ccs/index.html accessed 22 August 2018.Google Scholar
UNFCCC. 2015. Report of the Conference of the Parties on its Twenty-first Session. unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/10a01.pdf#page=2 accessed 26 October 2016.Google Scholar
United Nations Development Group. 2013. The Global Conversation Begins. New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
von Einsiedel, Sebastian, Malone, David M., and Ugarte, Bruno Stagno. 2015. The UN Security Council in an Age of Great Power Rivalry. United Nations University Working Paper Series, number 4.Google Scholar
Walker, Edward T. 2014. Grassroots for Hire: Public Affairs Consultants in American Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wampler, Brian and Hartz-Karp, Janette. 2012. Participatory Budgeting: Diffusion and Outcomes across the World. Journal of Public Deliberation 8 (2): 1–6.Google Scholar
Wardak, Ali and Braithwaite, John. 2013. Crime and War in Afghanistan: Part II: A Jeffersonian Alternative. British Journal of Criminology 53 (2): 197–214.Google Scholar
WCED. 1987. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
WFUNA (World Federation of United Nations Associations) 2018. UN Security Council Presidency – Civil Society Dialogues. www.wfuna.org/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/docs/unsc_presidency_cso_dialogues_one_pager_2018.pdf accessed 14 July 2018.Google Scholar
WHO [World Health Organisation] and UNAIDS. 2007. WHO and UNAIDS Announce Recommendations from Expert Consultation on Male circumcision for HIV Prevention. 28 March. https://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/releases/2007/pr10/en/ accessed 12 July 2018.Google Scholar
WHO. 2002. Gender and Health in Disasters. www.who.int/gender/other_health/genderdisasters.pdf accessed 12 July 2018.Google Scholar
Young, Oran R. 1994. International Governance: Protecting the Environment in a Stateless Society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Zürn, Michael. 2018. A Theory of Global Governance: Authority, Legitimacy, and Contestation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 36
- Cited by