Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
The Design Argument

The Design Argument

This Element analyzes the various forms that design arguments for the existence of God can take, but the main focus is on two such arguments. The first concerns the complex adaptive features that organisms have. Creationists who advance this argument contend that evolution by natural selection cannot be the right explanation. The second design argument - the argument from fine-tuning - begins with the fact that life could not exist in our universe if the constants found in the laws of physics had values that differed more than a little from their actual values. Since probability is the main analytical tool used, the Element provides a primer on probability theory.

  • Export citation
  • Recommend to librarian
  • Buy the print element
  • Copyright

  • COPYRIGHT: © Elliott Sober 2019

References

Hide all
Dembski, W. (1998b). “Intelligent Science and Design.” First Things 86: 21–27. Google Scholar
Cairn-Smith, A. G. (1982). Genetic Takeover and the Mineral Origins of Life. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
Johnson, P. (1991). Darwin on Trial. InterVarsity Press, 2nd edition, 1993. Google Scholar
Kitcher, P. (1983). Abusing Science. MIT Press. Google Scholar
Clutton-Brock, T. and Harvey, P. (1977). “Primate Ecology and Social Organization.” Journal of the Zoological Society of London 183: 1–39. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Hacking, I. (1965). The Logic of Statistical Inference. Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Kotzen, M. (2012). “Selection Biases in Likelihood Arguments.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 63: 825–839. CrossRef | Google Scholar
McGrew, L. (2004). “Testability, Likelihoods, and Design.” Philo 7: 5–21. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Meyer, S. (2009). Signature in the Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design. Harper Collins. Google Scholar
Arbuthnot, J. (1710). “An Argument for Divine Providence, Taken from the Constant Regularity Observ’d in the Births of Both Sexes.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 27: 186–190. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Collins, R. (2009). “The Teleological Argument: An Exploration of the Fine-Tuning of the Universe.” In W. Craig and J. Moreland (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 202–281. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Draper, P. (1989). “Pain and Pleasure: An Evidential Problem for Theists.” Noûs 23: 331–350. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Carter, B. (1974). “Large Number Coincidences and the Anthropic Principle in Cosmology.” In M. Longair (ed.), Confrontation of Cosmological Theories with Observational Data. Reidel, pp. 291–298. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Duhem, P. (1914). The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton University Press, 1954. Google Scholar
Howson, C. and Urbach, P. (1993). Scientific Reasoning: The Bayesian Approach. Open Court. Google Scholar
Hume, D. (1779). Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. D. Coleman (ed.), Cambridge University Press, 2007. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Lloyd, E. (2017). “Units and Levels of Selection.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2017/entries/selection-units/. Google Scholar
Dembski, W. (1998a). The Design Inference. Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
Kolmogorov, A. N. (1950). Foundations of the Theory of Probability. Chelsea. Google Scholar
Kingsolver, J. and Koehl, M. (1985). “Aerodynamics, Thermoregulation, and the Evolution of Insect Wings: Differential Scaling and Evolutionary Change.” Evolution 39: 488–504. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Aquinas, T. (1981). The Summa Theologica of Saint Thomas Aquinas. Christian Classics. Google Scholar
    Behe, M. (2006). “Whether Intelligent Design Is Science: A Response to the Opinion of the Court in Kitzmiller vs Dover Area School District.” Discovery Institute Web Site. www.discovery.org/f/697. Google Scholar
    Bartha, P. (2016). “Analogy and Analogical Reasoning.” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E. Zalta (ed.), https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/reasoning-analogy/. Google Scholar
    Darwin, C. (1871). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Murray. Google Scholar
    Forster, M. and Sober, E. (2004). “Why Likelihood?” In M. Taper and S. Lee (eds.), The Nature of Scientific Evidence. University of Chicago Press, pp. 153–165. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Jantzen, B. (2014). An Introduction to Design Arguments. Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Jeffrey, R. (1965). The Logic of Decision. University of Chicago Press, 2nd edition, 1983. Google Scholar
    Oppy, G. (2002). “Paley’s Argument for Design.” Philo 5.2: 161–173. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Behe, M. (1996). Darwin’s Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution. Free Press. Google Scholar
    Behe, M. (2004). “Irreducible Complexity: Obstacle to Darwinian Evolution.” In W. Dembski and M. Ruse (eds.), Debating Design: From Darwin to DNA. Cambridge University Press, pp. 352–370. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Colyvan, M. , Garfield, J. , and Priest, G. (2005). “Problems with the Argument from Fine Tuning.” Synthese 145: 325–338. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Crow, J. (1979). “Genes That Violate Mendel’s Rules.” Scientific American 240: 134–146. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Earman, J. (1987). “The SAP Also Rises: A Critical Examination of the Anthropic Principle.” American Philosophical Quarterly 24: 307–317. Google Scholar
    Fisher, R. (1956). Statistical Methods and Scientific Inference. Oliver and Boyd. Google Scholar
    McGrew, L. (2016). “Four (or so) New Fine-Tuning Arguments.” European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8: 85–106. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Monton, B. (2006). “God, Fine-Tuning, and the Problem of Old Evidence.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57: 405–424. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Morris, H. (1980). King of Creation. CLP Publishers. Google Scholar
    Eddington, A. (1939). The Philosophy of Physical Science. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    Dawkins, R. (1986). The Blind Watchmaker. Norton. Google Scholar
    Forrest, B. and Gross, P. (2004). Creationism’s Trojan Horse: The Wedge of Intelligent Design. Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Forster, M. (2006). “Counterexamples to a Likelihood Theory of Evidence.” Minds and Machines 16: 319–338. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Krebs, J. and Davies, N. (1981). An Introduction to Behavioral Ecology. Sinauer. Google Scholar
    Doolittle, W. F. and Sapienza, C. (1980). “Selfish Genes, the Phenotype Paradigm and Genome Evolution.” Nature 284: 601–603. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Fisher, R. (1930). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection. Oxford University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Fitelson, B. (2011). “Favoring, Likelihoods, and Bayesianism.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8: 666–672. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    79Hacking, I. (1987). “The Inverse Gambler’s Fallacy: The Argument from Design and the Anthropic Principle Applied to Wheeler Universes.” Mind 96: 331–340. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    McGrew, T. , McGrew, L. , and Vestrup, E. (2001). “Probabilities and the Fine-Tuning Argument: A Sceptical View.” Mind 110: 1027–1037. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Narveson, J. (2003). “God by Design?” in N. Manson (ed.), God and Design. Routledge, pp. 88–104. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Gould, S. (1980). “The Panda’s Thumb.” In The Panda’s Thumb, Norton, pp. 19–26. Google Scholar
    Fitelson, B. , Stephens, C. , and Sober, E. (1999). “How Not to Detect Design, a Review of William Dembski’s The Design Inference .” Philosophy of Science 66: 472–488. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Lipton, P. (2004). Inference to the Best Explanation. Routledge, 2nd edition. Google Scholar
    O’Connor, D. (2001). Hume on Religion . Routledge. Google Scholar
    Leslie, J. (1989). Universes. Routledge. Google Scholar
    Darwin, C. (1874). The Descent of Man and Selection in Relation to Sex. Murray, 2nd edition. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Le Poidevin, R. (1996). Arguing for Atheism. Routledge. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    80 Numbers, R. (2004). “Ironic Heresy: How Young-Earth Creationists Came to Embrace Rapid Microevolution by Means of Natural Selection.” In A. Lustig , R. Richards , and M. Ruse (eds.), Darwinian Heresies. Cambridge University Press, pp. 84–104. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Everitt, N. (2003). The Non-Existence of God . Routledge. Google Scholar
    Horwich, P. (1982). Probability and Evidence. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    Branch, G. (2017). “Paley the Plagiarist?” https://ncse.com/blog/2017/01/paley-plagiarist-0018388. Google Scholar
    Buckland, W. (1836). Geology and Mineralogy Considered with Reference to Natural Theology Vol. 1. The Perfect Library, 2015. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Collins, R. (2003). “Evidence for Fine-Tuning.” In N. Manson (ed.), God and Design. Routledge, pp. 178–199. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    78 Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species. Harvard University Press, 1964. Google Scholar
    Edwards, A. (1972). Likelihood. Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    Venn, J. (1866). The Logic of Chance. Chelsea Publishing. Google Scholar
    Shanks, N. and Joplin, K. (1999). “Redundant Complexity: A Critical Analysis of Intelligent Design in Biochemistry.” Philosophy of Science 66: 268–282. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    81 Sedley, D. (2007). Creationism and Its Critics in Antiquity. University of California Press. Google Scholar
    Palazzo, A. and Gregory, T. (2014). “The Case for Junk DNA.” PLOS Genetics 10.5: e1004351. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004351 CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Roberts, J. (2012). “Fine-Tuning and the Infrared Bulls-Eye.” Philosophical Studies 160: 287–303. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (2009). “Absence of Evidence and Evidence of Absence: Evidential Transitivity in Connection with Fossils, Fishing, Fine-Tuning, and Firing Squads.” Philosophical Studies 143: 63–90. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Orr, H. A. (1997). “Darwin v. Intelligent Design (Again).” Boston Review, December/January. pp. 41–54. Google Scholar
    Pyle, A. (2006). Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion: A Reader’s Guide. Bloomsbury. Google Scholar
    Paley, W. (1802). Natural Theology, or, Evidences of the Existence and Attributes of the Deity, Collected from the Appearances of Nature. Rivington. Google Scholar
    Orgel, L. & Crick, F. (1980). “Selfish DNA: The Ultimate Parasite.” Nature 284: 604–607. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Sober, E. (1984). The Nature of Selection. MIT Press. Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (1990). Core Questions in Philosophy: A Text with Readings. Macmillan. Google Scholar
    White, R. (2000). “Fine-Tuning and Multiple Universes.” Nous 34: 260–276. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (2002). “Intelligent Design and Probability Reasoning.” International Journal for the Philosophy of Religion 52: 65–80. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (2008). Evidence and Evolution: The Logic Behind the Science. Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (2012). “Coincidences and How to Think about Them.” In European Philosophy of Science Association Proceedings 2009, Springer, pp. 355–374. Google Scholar
    83White, R. (2015). “The Argument from Cosmological Fine-Tuning.” In G. Rosen , A. Byrne , J. Cohen , and S. Shiffrin (eds.), The Norton Introduction to Philosophy. Norton, pp. 45–50. Google Scholar
    Zach, R. (1978). “Selection and Dropping of Whelks by Northwestern Crows.” Behaviour 67: 134–148. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Priest, G. (1981). “The Argument from Design.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 59: 422–431. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (1999). “Testability.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 73: 47–76. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Orzack, S. and Sober, E. (1994). “Optimality Models and the Test of Adaptationism.” American Naturalist 143: 361–380. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Schupbach, J. (2005). “Paley’s Inductive Inference to Design.” Philosophia Christi 7: 2. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (2007b). “What’s Wrong with Intelligent Design?” Quarterly Review of Biology 82: 1–8. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (2015). Ockham’s Razors: A User’s Manual. Cambridge University Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Swinburne, R. (2004). The Existence of God. Oxford University Press. 2nd edition, 2010. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Miracles David Basinger Google Scholar
    Shapiro, A. (2009). “William Paley’s ‘Lost’ Intelligent Design.” History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 31: 55–77. Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Sober, E. (2007a). “Intelligent Design Theory and the Supernatural: The ‘God or Extra-Terrestrials’ Reply.” Faith and Philosophy 24: 72–82. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sober, E. and Orzack, J. (2003). “Common Ancestry and Natural Selection.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54: 423–437. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Salmon, W. (1978). “Religion and Science: A New Look at Hume’s Dialogues .” Philosophical Studies 33: 143–176. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (2004). “Likelihood, Model Selection, and the Duhem-Quine Problem.” Journal of Philosophy 101: 1–22. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Whewell, W. (1833). Astronomy and General Physics Considered with Reference to Natural Theology. Kessinger Publishing, 2014. Google Scholar
    van Fraassen, B. (1989). Laws and Symmetry. Clarendon Press. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Zhang, J. and Zhang, K. (2015). “Likelihood and Consilience: On Forster’s Counterexamples to the Likelihood Theory of Evidence.” Philosophy of Science 82: 930–940. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Russell, R. (1912). “On the Notion of Cause.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 13: 1–26. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Robson, J. (1990). “The Fiat and Finger of God: The Bridgewater Treatises”. In R. Helmstadter , B. ; Lightman , and V. Bernard (eds.). Victorian Faith in Crisis: Essays on Continuity and Change in Nineteenth-Century Religious Belief. Stanford University Press Google Scholar
    Shimony, A. (1970). “Scientific Inference.” In R. Colodny (ed.), The Nature and Function of Scientific Theories. University of Pittsburgh Press. Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (2011). Did Darwin Write the Origin Backwards? Prometheus Books. Google Scholar
    Swinburne, R. (1997). Simplicity As Evidence of Truth. Marquette University Press. Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (1986). “Explanatory Presupposition.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64: 143–149. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sober, E. & Wilson, D. (1998). Unto Others. Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1982a). “Evidential Impact of Base Rates.” In D. Kahneman , P. Slovic , & A. Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–160. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    The Divine Attributes T. J. Mawson Google Scholar
    Sarkar, S. (2007). Doubting Darwin: Creationist Designs of Evolution. Blackwell. Google Scholar
    Cosmological Arguments Michael Almeida CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (forthcoming-b). “Is Fine-Tuning Evidence for God’s Existence? No.” In M. Peterson and R. VanArragon (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Philosophy of Religion. Wiley-Blackwell, 2nd edition. Google Scholar
    Sober, E. and Steel, M. (2017). “Similarities as Evidence for Common Ancestry: A Likelihood Epistemology.” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 68: 617–638. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Titelbaum, M. (2013). Quitting Certainties: A Bayesian Framework Modeling Degrees of Belief. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    Vassend, O , Sober, E. , and Fitelson, B. (2017). “The Philosophical Significance of Stein’s Paradox.” European Journal for the Philosophy of Science 7: 411–433. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Wells, J. (2011). The Myth of Junk DNA. Discovery Institute Press. Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (1993). Philosophy of Biology. Westview Press. Google Scholar
    Sober, E. and Steel, M. (2002). “Testing the Hypothesis of Common Ancestry.” Journal of Theoretical Biology 218: 395–408. CrossRef | Google Scholar
  • PubMed
  • Weisberg, J. (2005). “Firing Squads and Fine-Tuning: Sober on the Design Argument.” British Society for the Philosophy of Science 56: 809–821. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Weisberg, J. (2010). “A Note on Design: What’s Fine-Tuning Got to Do with It?” Analysis 70.3: 431–438. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Religious Disagreement Helen De Cruz CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Royall, R. (1997). Statistical Evidence: A Likelihood Paradigm. Chapman & Hall/CRC. Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (2003). “The Argument from Design.” In N. Manson (ed.), God and Design. Routledge, pp. 25–53. Reprinted in W. Mann (ed.), The Blackwell Guide to Philosophy of Religion, 2004, pp. 117–147. Google Scholar
    Psillos, S. (2007). “The Fine Structure of Inference to the Best Explanation.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 74: 441–448. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Sober, E. (forthcoming-a). “A Bayesian Double Negative: A Critique of Hume’s Treatment of the Design Argument in the Dialogues and of the Design 82Argument Itself.” In K. Williford (ed.), Essays on Hume’s Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. Routledge. Google Scholar
    Swinburne, R. (1968). “The Argument from Design.” Philosophy 43: 199–212. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Atheism and Agnosticism Graham Oppy CrossRef | Google Scholar
    Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1982b). “Judgments of and by Representativeness.” In D. Kahneman , P. Slovic , & A. Tversky (eds.), Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Cambridge University Press, pp. 84–98. CrossRef | Google Scholar
    The Atonement William Lane Craig CrossRef | Google Scholar
    God and Time Natalja Deng Google Scholar

    Metrics

    Altmetric attention score

    Full text views

    Total number of HTML views: 0
    Total number of PDF views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    Abstract views

    Total abstract views: 0 *
    Loading metrics...

    * Views captured on Cambridge Core between #date#. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

    Usage data cannot currently be displayed