Element contents
Determining Provenance from Compositional Data
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 February 2026
Summary
Traditionally, classical multivariate statistical methods have been applied to relate cultural materials recovered at archaeological sites to their respective raw material sources. However, when reviewing published research, which usually claims to have reached a high degree of confidence in the assignment of materials, the authors have detected that those applying these methods can make serious errors that compromise the inferences made. This Element reconsiders the use of statistical methods to address the problem of provenance analysis of archaeological materials using a step-by-step procedure that allows the recognition of natural groups in the data, thus obtaining better quality classifications while avoiding the problems of total or partial overlaps in the chemical groups (common in biplots). To evaluate the methods proposed here, the challenge of group search in ceramic materials is addressed using algorithms derived from model-based clustering. For cases with partial data labeling, a semi-supervised algorithm is applied to obsidian samples.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009634205Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 26 March 2026
References
Adolfsson, A., Ackerman, M., & Brownstein, N. (2019). To cluster, or not to cluster: An analysis of clusterability methods. Pattern Recognition, 88, 13–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, J. (1986). The statistical analysis of compositional data. London: Chapman & Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, J. (2003). A concise guide to compositional data analysis. 2nd Compositional Data Analysis Workshop (pp. 1–134). Girona, Spain: Universitat de Girona.Google Scholar
Alelyani, S., Tang, J., & Liu, H. (2014). Feature selection for clustering: A review. In Aggarwal, C. & Reddy, C. (eds.), Data clustering: Algorithms and applications (pp. 1–32). Hoboken: Chapman and Hall/CRC Press.Google Scholar
Ambrose, W., Allen, C., O’Connor, S., Spriggs, M., Vasco Oliveira, N., & Reepmeyer, C. (2009). Possible obsidian sources for artifacts from Timor: Narrowing the options using chemical data. Journal of Archaeological Science, 36(3), 607–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, J. & McNicholas, P. (2014). Variable selection for clustering and classification. Journal of Classification, 31, 136–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Argote, D., López-García, P., Torres-García, M., & Thrun, M. (2024). Machine learning for archaeological applications in R. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Argote Espino, D., Solé, J., López García, P., & Sterpone, O. (2012). Obsidian sub-source identification in the Sierra de Pachuca and Otumba volcanic regions, Central Mexico, by ICP-MS and DBSCAN statistical analysis. Geoarchaeology, 27, 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagus, A. & Pramana, S. (2016). advclust: Object oriented advanced clustering, Version 0.4. https://rdrr.io/rforge/advclust/.Google Scholar
Banfield, J. & Raftery, A. (1993). Model-based Gaussian and non-Gaussian clustering. Biometrics, 49(3), 803–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudry, J., Raftery, A., Celeux, G., Lo, K., & Gottardo, R. (2010). Combining mixture components for clustering. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 9(2), 332–353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baxter, M. (2001). Statistical modelling of artefact compositional data. Archaeometry, 43(1), 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, M. (2015). Notes on quantitative archaeology and R. www.researchgate.net/publication/277931925_Notes_on_Quantitative_Archaeology_and_R.Google Scholar
Baxter, M. & Buck, C. (2000). Data handling and statistical analysis. In Ciliberto, E. S. & Spoto, G. (eds.), Modern analytical methods in art and archaeology (pp. 681–746). New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar
Baxter, M. & Cool, H. (2016). Basic statistical graphics for archaeology with R: Life beyond Excel. Nottingham: Barbican Research Associates and Nottingham Trent University.Google Scholar
Baxter, M., Beardah, C., Cool, H., & Jackson, C. (2003). Compositional data analysis in archaeometry. CoDaWork03: Compositional Data Analysis Workshop. Girona, Spain: Universitat de Girona. https://ima.udg.es/Activitats/CoDaWork03/paper_baxter_Beardah1.pdf.Google Scholar
Baxter, M., Beardah, C., Cool, H., & Jackson, C. (2005). Further studies in the compositional variability of colourless Romano-British vessel glass. Archaeometry, 47(1), 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, M. & Jackson, C. (2001). Variable selection in artefact compositional studies. Archaeometry, 43(2), 253–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben Dor, Y., Finkel, M., & Ben-Yosef, E. (2023). A probabilistic approach to provenance studies using whole object elemental composition: Chert (flint) as a case study. Journal of Archaeological Science, 153, 105767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ben-Gal, I. (2005). Outlier detection. In Maimon, O. & Rokach, L. (eds.), Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook: A complete guide for practitioners and researchers (pp. 131–146). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biernacki, C., Marbac, M., & Vandewalle, V. (2021). Gaussian-based visualization of Gaussian and non-Gaussian model-based clustering. Journal of Classification, 38, 129–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bouveyron, C., Celeux, G., Murphy, T., & Raftery, A. (2019). Model-based clustering and classification for data science with applications in R. Cambridge Series in Statistical and Probabilistic Mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brock, G., Pihur, V., Datta, S., & Datta, S. (2008). clValid: An R package for cluster validation. Journal of Statistical Software, 25(4), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, S. (2015). Geochemical characterization of obsidian subsources in Highland Guatemala. Unpublished BA thesis. Pennsylvania: Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
Cebeci, Z. (2020). fcvalid: An R package for internal validation of probabilistic and possibilistic clustering. Sakarya University Journal of Computer and Information Sciences, 3(1), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celeux, G. & Govaert, G. (1995). Gaussian parsimonious clustering models. Pattern Recognition, 28(5), 781–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charrad, M., Ghazzali, N., Boiteau, V., & Niknafs, A. (2014). NbClust: An R package for determining the relevant number of clusters in a data set. Journal of Statistical Software, 61(6), 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cobean, R. (2002). A world of obsidian: The mining and trade of a volcanic glass in ancient Mexico. Mexico: INAH and Pittsburgh University.Google Scholar
Craig, N., Speakman, R., Popelka-Filcoff, R., Glascock, M., Robertson, J., Shackley, M., & Aldenderfer, M. (2007). Comparison of XRF and PXRF for analysis of archaeological obsidian from southern Perú. Journal of Archaeological Science, 34(12), 2012–2024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cribbin, L. (2008). upclass: R package for performing updated classification rules. Unpublished MSc thesis. Dublin: University College Dublin.Google Scholar
Dagnino, J. (2014). Muestras, variabilidad y error. Revista Chilena de Anestesia, 43(2), 100–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dang, U., Gallaugher, M., Browne, R., & McNicholas, P. (2019). Model-based clustering and classification using mixtures of multivariate skewed power exponential distributions. Journal of Classification, 40, 145–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dempster, A., Laird, N., & Rubin, D. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological), 39(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desgraupes, B. (2018). Package ‘clusterCrit’: Clustering indices. https://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=clusterCrit.Google Scholar
Dolan, S. (2016). Black rocks in the borderlands: Obsidian procurement in southwestern New Mexico and northwestern Chihuahua, Mexico, AD 1000 to 1450. PhD dissertation. Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma Graduate College.Google Scholar
Dolan, S., Whalen, M., Minnis, P., & Shackley, M. (2017). Obsidian in the Casas Grandes world: Procurement, exchange, and interaction in Chihuahua, Mexico, CE 1200–1450. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 11, 555–567.Google Scholar
Duda, R., Hart, P., & Stork, D. (2001). Pattern classification. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Egozcue, J. & Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. (2011). Análisis composicional de datos en ciencias geoambientales. Boletín Geológico y Minero, 122(4), 439–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egozcue, J., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Mateu-Figueras, G., & Barceló-Vidal, C. (2003). Isometric logratio transformations for compositional data analysis. Mathematical Geology, 35(3), 279–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etherington, T. (2019). Mahalanobis distances and ecological niche modelling: Correcting a chi-squared probability error. PeerJ, 7, e6678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Everitt, B., Landau, S., Leese, M., & Stahl, D. (2011). Cluster analysis. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics Vol. 848. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filzmoser, P., Hron, K., & Reimann, C. (2009). Principal component analysis for compositional data with outliers. Environmetrics, 20(6), 621–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Filzmoser, P., Hron, K., & Reimann, C. (2012). Interpretation of multivariate outliers for compositional data. Computers & Geosciences, 39, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fish, P., Fish, S., Whittlesey, S., Neff, H., Glascock, M., & Elam, M. (1992). An evaluation of the production and exchange of Tanque Verde red-on-brown in southern Arizona. In Neff, H. (ed.), Chemical characterization of ceramic pastes in archaeology (pp. 62–68). Madison: Prehistory Press.Google Scholar
Fisher, R. (1936). The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Annals of Eugenics, 7(2), 179–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fop, M. & Murphy, T. (2018). Variable selection methods for model-based clustering. Statistics Surveys, 12, 18–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowlkes, E. & Mallows, C. (1983). A method for comparing two hierarchical clusterings. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 78(383), 553–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraley, C. & Raftery, A. (1998). How many clusters? Which clustering method? Answers via model-based cluster analysis. The Computer Journal, 41(8), 578–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraley, C., Raftery, A., Murphy, T., & Scrucca, L. (2012). mclust version 4 for R: Normal mixture modeling for model-based clustering, classification, and density estimation. Technical Report no. 597. Washington: Department of Statistics, University of Washington.Google Scholar
García-Heras, M., Blackman, J., Ruiz, M., & Bishop, R. (2001). Assessing ceramic compositional data: A comparison of total reflexion X-ray fluorescence and instrumental neutron activation analysis on late Iron Age Spanish Celtiberian ceramics. Archaeometry, 43(3), 325–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glascock, M. D. (1992). Characterization of archaeological ceramics at MURR by neutron activation analysis and multivariate statistics. In Neff, H. (ed.), Chemical characterization of ceramic pastes in archaeology (pp. 11–26). Madison: Prehistory Press.Google Scholar
Glascock, M. D. (2002). Obsidian provenance research in the Americas. Accounts of Chemical Research, 35(8), 611–617.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glascock, M. D. (2011). Comparison and contrast between XRF and NAA: Used for characterization of obsidian sources in Central Mexico. In Shackley (ed.), M. S., X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (XRF) in geoarchaeology (pp. 161–192). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glascock, M. D. (2021). MURRAP user guide. https://archaeometry.missouri.edu/downloads/MURRAP_User_Guide.pdf.Google Scholar
Glascock, M. D. (2022). GAUSS runtime download. https://archaeometry.missouri.edu/gauss.html.Google Scholar
Glascock, M. D., Braswell, G., & Cobean, R. (1998). A systematic approach to obsidian source characterization. In Shackley, M. S. (ed.), Archaeological obsidian studies (pp. 15–65). Boston: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glascock, M. D., Weigand, P., Esparza López, R., Ohnersorgen, M., Garduño Ambriz, M., Mountjoy, J. & Darling, J. (2010). Geochemical characterisation of obsidian in Western Mexico: The sources in Jalisco, Nayarit, and Zacatecas. In Kuzmin, Y. & Glascock, M. D., Crossing the straits: Prehistoric obsidian source exploitation in the North Pacific Rim (pp. 201–218). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Gordon, A. (1998). Cluster validation. In Hayashi, C., Ohsumi, N., Yajima, K., Tanaka, Y., Bock, H., & Bada, Y., Data science, classification, and related methods (pp. 22–39). Tokyo: Springer Tokyo.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenacre, M. (2017). Towards a pragmatic approach to compositional data analysis. Economics Working Paper Series, Working Paper no. 1554. Barcelona: Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
Haferlach, T., Kohlmann, A., Wieczorek, L., Basso, G., Te Kronnie, G., Béné, M.-C., De Vos, J., Hernández, J. M., Hofmann, W. K., Mills, K. I., Gilkes, A., Chiaretti, S., Shurtleff, S.A., Kipps, T. J., Rassenti, L. Z., Yeoh, A. E., Papenhausen, P. R., Liu, W. M., Williams, P. M., & Foà, R. (2010). Clinical utility of microarray-based gene expression profiling in the diagnosis and subclassification of leukemia: Report from the International Microarray Innovations in Leukemia Study Group. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 28(15), 2529–2537.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hall, M. (2004). Pottery production during the Late Jomon period: Insights from the chemical analyses of Kasori B pottery. Journal of Archaeological Science, 31(10), 1439–1450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, M. & Minyaev, S. (2002). Chemical analyses of Xiong-Nu pottery: A preliminary study of exchange and trade on the inner Asian steppes. Journal of Archaeological Science, 29(2), 135–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handl, J., Knowles, J., & Kell, D. (2005). Computational cluster validation in post-genomic data analysis. Bioinformatics, 21(15), 3201–3212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harbottle, G. (1976). Neutron activation analysis in archaeology. Radiochemistry, 3, 33–72.Google Scholar
Harry, K. (1997). Ceramic production, distribution, and consumption in two Classic period Hohokam communities. Unpublished PhD thesis. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Harry, K., Fish, P., & Fish, S. (2002). Ceramic production and distribution in two classic period Hohokam communities. In Glowacki, D. & Neff, H., Ceramic production and circulation in the greater Southwest: Source determination by INAA and complementary mineralogical investigations (pp. 99–109). Los Angeles: The Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, UCLA.Google Scholar
Heller, K. (2007). Efficient Bayesian methods for clustering. Unpublished PhD thesis. London, UK: University College London.Google Scholar
Hubert, M. & Van der Veeken, S. (2008). Outlier detection for skewed data. Journal of Chemometrics, 22(3–4), 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubert, M., Rousseeuw, P., & Vanden Branden, K. (2005). ROBPCA: A new approach to robust principal component analysis. Technometrics, 47(1), 64–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Iñañez, J., Speakman, R., Buxeda-i-Garrigós, J., & Glascock, M. D. (2009). Chemical characterization of tin-lead glazed pottery from the Iberian Peninsula and the Canary Islands: Initial steps toward a better understanding of Spanish colonial pottery in the Americas. Archaeometry, 51(4), 546–567.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Italiano, F., Correale, A., Di Bella, M., Martin, F., Martinelli, M., Sabatino, G., & Spatafora, F. (2018). The Neolithic obsidian artifacts from Roccapalumba (Palermo, Italy): First characterization and provenance determination. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry, 18(3), 151–167.Google Scholar
Jain, A. & Dubes, R. (1988). Algorithms for clustering data. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Kaufman, L. & Rousseeuw, P. (2005). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
Krijthe, J. H. (2017). RSSL: Semi-supervised learning in R. In Kerautret, B., Colom, M., & Monasse, P. (eds.), Reproducible research in pattern recognition. RRPR 2016 (pp. 104–115). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langrognet, F., Lebret, R., Poli, C., Lovleff, S., & Auder, B. (2025). Package ‘Rmixmod’ version 2.1.10: Classification with mixture modelling. https://cloud.r-project.org/web/packages/Rmixmod/Rmixmod.pdf.Google Scholar
Lebret, R., Lovleff, S., Langrognet, F., Biernacki, C., Celeux, G., & Govaert, G. (2015). Rmixmod: The R package of the model-based unsupervised, supervised, and semi-supervised classification Mixmod library. Journal of Statistical Software, 67(6), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lerdo de Tejada Pavón, M. (2014). Estimación de datos faltantes con el Algoritmo EM. Unpublished thesis. Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
López-García, P., Argote, D., & Thrun, M. (2020). Projection-based classification of chemical groups for provenance analysis of archaeological materials. IEEE Access, 8, 152439–152451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-García, P., Argote, D., Torres-García, M., & Thrun, M. (2024). Knowledge discovery from archaeological materials. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
López-García, P., García-Gómez, V., Acosta-Ochoa, G., & Argote, D. (2024). Semi-supervised classification to determine the provenance of archaeological obsidian samples. Archaeometry, 66(1), 142–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maechler, M. (2023). CRAN task view: Robust statistical methods. Version 2023–07–01. https://CRAN.R-project.org/view=Robust.Google Scholar
Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M., & Hornik, K. (2024). Cluster: Cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package version 2.1.8. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=cluster.Google Scholar
Marbac, M. & Sedki, M. (2017). Variable selection for model-based clustering using the integrated complete-data likelihood. Statistics and Computing, 27(4), 1049–1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín-Fernández, J., Barceló-Vidal, C., & Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. (2003). Dealing with zeros and missing values in compositional data sets using nonparametric imputation. Mathematical Geology, 35, 253–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martín-Fernández, J., Buxeda i Garrigós, J., & Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. (2015). Logratio analysis in archaeometry: Principles and methods. In Barcelo, J. & Bogdanovic, I. (eds.), Mathematics and archaeology (pp. 178–189). Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Mateu-Figueras, G., Martín-Fernández, J., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., & Barceló-Vidal, C. (2003). El problema del análisis estadístico de datos composicionales. 27° Congreso Nacional de Estadística e Investigación Operativa (pp. 480–488). Lleida, Spain: Sociedad Española de Estadística e Investigación Operativa.Google Scholar
Maugis, C., Celeux, G., & Martin-Magniette, M. (2009a). Variable selection for clustering with Gaussian mixture models. Biometrics, 65(3), 701–709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maugis, C., Celeux, G., & Martin-Magniette, M. (2009b). Variable selection in model-based clustering: A general variable role modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 53(11), 3872–3882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mendelsohn, R. (2018). Obsidian sourcing and dynamic trade patterns at Izapa, Chiapas, Mexico: 100 BCE–400 CE. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 20, 634–646.Google Scholar
Millhauser, J., Fargher, L., Heredia Espinoza, V., & Blanton, R. (2015). The geopolitics of obsidian supply in Postclassic Tlaxcallan: A portable X-ray fluorescence study. Journal of Archaeological Science, 58, 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millhauser, J., Rodríguez-Alegría, E., & Glascock, M. (2011). Testing the accuracy of portable X-ray fluorescence to study Aztec and Colonial obsidian supply at Xaltocan, Mexico. Journal of Archaeological Science, 38(11), 3141–3152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milligan, G. & Cooper, M. (1988). A study of standardization of variables in cluster analysis. Journal of Classification, 5, 181–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moholy-Nagy, H., Meierhoff, J., Golitko, M., & Kestle, C. (2013). An analysis of pXRF obsidian source attributions from Tikal, Guatemala. Latin American Antiquity, 24(1), 72–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, T., Dean, N., & Raftery, A. (2010). Variable selection and updating in model-based discriminant analysis for high dimensional data with food authenticity applications. The Annals of Applied Statistics, 4(1), 396–421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neff, H. (1992). Chemical characterization of ceramic pastes in archaeology. Monographs in World Archaeology, vol. 7. Madison, WI: Prehistory Press.Google Scholar
Palarea-Albaladejo, J. & Martín-Fernández, J. (2015). zCompositions – R package for multivariate imputation of left-censored data under a compositional approach. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 143, 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. & Buccianti, A. (2011). Compositional data analysis: Theory and applications. Chichester, UK: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. & Egozcue, J. (2006). Compositional data and their analysis: An introduction. In Buccianti, A., Mateu-Figueras, G., & Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. (eds.), Compositional data analysis in the geosciences: From theory to practice (pp. 1–10). Special Publication, vol. 264. London: Geological Society.Google Scholar
Pawlowsky-Glahn, V., Egozcue, J., & Tolosana-Delgado, J. (2007). Lecture notes on compositional data analysis. http://diobma.udg.edu/handle/10256/297/.Google Scholar
Pierce, D. (2015). Visual and geochemical analyses of obsidian source use at San Felipe Aztatán, Mexico. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 40, 266–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing.https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/r-release/fullrefman.pdf.Google Scholar
Raftery, A. & Dean, N. (2006). Variable selection for model-based clustering. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101(473), 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimann, C., Filzmoser, P., & Garrett, R. (2002). Factor analysis applied to regional geochemical data: Problems and possibilities. Applied Geochemistry, 17(3), 185–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousseeuw, P. (1987). Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 20, 53–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, N., Cribbin, L., & Murphy, T. (2013). upclass-package: Updated classification methods using unlabeled data. Version 2.0. https://rdrr.io/cran/upclass/man/upclass-package.html.Google Scholar
Salem, N. & Hussein, S. (2019). Data dimensional reduction and principal components analysis. Procedia Computer Science, 163, 292–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrucca, L. & Raftery, A. (2018). clustvarsel: A package implementing variable selection for Gaussian model-based clustering in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 84(1), 1–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sedki, M., Celeux, G., & Maugis, C. (2014). SelvarMix: A R package for variable selection in model-based clustering and discriminant analysis with a regularization approach. Research report no. hal-01053784. Retrieved from: https://hal.inria.fr/hal-01053784.Google Scholar
Sedki, M., Celeux, G., & Maugis-Rabusseau, C. (2017). Package ‘SelvarMix’: Regularization for variable selection in model-based clustering and discriminant analysis. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SelvarMix.Google Scholar
Shackley, M. S. (2005). Obsidian: Geology and archaeology in the North American Southwest. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
Smith, M., Burke, A., Hare, T., & Glascock, M. (2007). Sources of imported obsidian at Postclassic sites in the Yautepec Valley, Morelos: A characterization study using XRF and INAA. Latin American Antiquity, 18(4), 429–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrun, M. (2018). Projection-based clustering through self-organization and swarm intelligence: Combining cluster analysis with the visualization of high-dimensional data. Heidelberg: Springer Vieweg.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrun, M. C. (2025). Package: DatabionicSwarm (via r-universe): Swarm intelligence for self-organized clustering. https://cran.r-universe.dev/DatabionicSwarm/DatabionicSwarm.pdf.Google Scholar
Thrun, M. C. & Ultsch, A. (2018). Effects of the payout system of income taxes to municipalities in Germany. 12th Professor Aleksander Zelias International Conference on Modelling and Forecasting of Socio-Economic Phenomena, vol. 1 (pp. 533–542). Zakopane, Poland: GfKl, Data Science Society.Google Scholar
Thrun, M. C. & Ultsch, A. (2021). Swarm intelligence for self-organized clustering. Artificial Intelligence, 290, 103237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrun, M. C., Pape, F., Hansen-Goos, O., & Ultsch, A. (2025, 01 26). DataVisualizations: Visualizations of high-dimensional data. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=DataVisualizations.Google Scholar
Tykot, R. (2016). Using non-destructive portable X-ray fluorescence spectrometers on stone, ceramics, metals, and other materials in museums: Advantages and limitations. Applied Spectroscopy, 70(1), 42–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ultsch, A. (1995). Self organizing neural networks perform different from statistical k-means clustering. Proceedings of the Society for Information and Classification (GFKL) (pp. 1–13). Basel, Switzerland.Google Scholar
Ultsch, A. & Thrun, M. C. (2017). Credible visualizations for planar projections. Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Self-Organizing Maps and Learning Vector Quantization, Clustering and Data Visualization (WSOM 2017) (pp. 256–260). Nancy, France: IEEE.Google Scholar
van Buuren, S. & Groothuis-Oudshoorn, K. (2011). mice: Multivariate imputation by chained equations in R. Journal of Statistical Software, 45(3), 1–67.Google Scholar
van den Boogaart, K. & Tolosana-Delgado, R. (2013). Analyzing compositional data with R. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Boogaart, K., Tolosana-Delgado, R., & Bren, M. (2023). Package ‘compositions’ versión 2.0–6: Compositional data analysis. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/compositions/.Google Scholar
Varmuza, K. & Filzmoser, P. (2009). Introduction to multivariate statistical analysis in chemometrics. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Waite, D. (2020). Household economies and socioeconomic integration: An analysis of obsidian artifacts from Coba, Quintana Roo and Yaxuna, Yucatan, Mexico. MA thesis. Orlando, FL: University of Central Florida.Google Scholar
Wang, S. & Zhu, J. (2008). Variable selection for model-based high-dimensional clustering and its application to microarray data. Biometrics, 64(2), 440–448.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wehrens, R. (2011). Chemometrics with R: Multivariate data analysis in the natural and life sciences. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weigand, P., Harbottle, G., & Sayre, E. (1977). Turquoise sources and source analysis: Mesoamerica and the Southwestern U.S.A. In Earle, T. & Ericson, J. (eds.), Exchange systems in prehistory (pp. 15–34). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, L. & Friendly, M. (2009). The history of the cluster heat map. The American Statistician, 63(2), 179–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, B., Pan, W., & Shen, X. (2008). Penalized model-based clustering with cluster-specific diagonal covariance matrices and grouped variables. Electronic Journal of Statistics, 2, 168–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, R. & Wunsch, D. (2005). Survey of clustering algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 16(3), 645–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zaki, M. & Meira, W. (2014). Data mining and analysis: Fundamental concepts and algorithms. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, X. & Goldberg, A. (2009). Introduction to semi-supervised learning. Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, no. 6. Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.