Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cc8bf7c57-qfg88 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-11T13:40:35.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Philosophy of Law

The Differentiation and Autonomy of Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 September 2023

Emilios Christodoulidis
Emilios Christodoulidis
Affiliation:
University of Glasgow

Summary

This Element looks first at the fundamental principle of modernity that is the functional differentiation of society, and the emergence of autonomous, positive law. The careful architecture of differentiation, balance, and mutual performance between the legal, political and economic systems is jeopardised with the hypertrophy of any one of the structurally coupled systems at the expense of the others. The pathologies are described in the second section of the Element. It explores how, under conditions of globalisation, market thinking came to hoist itself to the position of privileged site of societal rationality. In the third section we look at what sustains law's own 'reflexive intelligence' under conditions of globalisation, and whether we can still rely today on the constitutional achievement to guarantee law's autonomy, its democratic credentials and its ability to reproduce normative expectations today.
Get access

Keywords

globalisationhuman rightsfunctional differentiationautonomy of lawjuridification
Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Philosophy of Law
Online ISBN: 9781009004619
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 05 October 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackerman, B (1984) ‘Discovering the Constitution’. Yale Law Journal, 93(6), 1013–72.Google Scholar
Alexy, R (1989) A Theory of Legal Argumentation (trans. R Adler and DN MacCormick). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Alexy, R (2002) A Theory of Constitutional Rights (trans. J Rivers). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berman, HJ (2003) Law and Revolution. Vol. II, The Impact of the Protestant Reformations on the Western Legal Tradition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bloch, E (2018/1986) On Karl Marx. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Brunkhorst, H (2011) ‘The Return of Crisis’ in Kjaer, P, Teubner, G and Febbrajo, A (eds.), The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective. Oxford: Hart, pp. 133–72.Google Scholar
Choudry, S (ed.) (2007) The Migration of Constitutional Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christodoulidis, E (2020) ‘The Myth of Democratic Governance’ in Kjaer, PF (ed.), The Law of Political Economy: Transformation in the Function of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 62–88.Google Scholar
Christodoulidis, E (2021) The Redress of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christodoulidis, E, Dukes, R and Goldoni, M (2019) Research Handbook in Critical Legal Theory. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
de Sousa Santos, B (2015) Epistemologies of the South: Justice against Epistemicide. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Debray, R (1983) Critique of Political Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Derrida, J (1992) ’Force of Law: The “Mystical Foundations of Authority”’ in Cornell, D, Rosenfeld, M and Gray Carson, D (eds.), Deconstruction and the Possibility of Justice. New York: Routledge, pp. 3–67.Google Scholar
Dobner, P and Loughlin, M (eds.) (2010) The Twilight of Constitutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E (1893/1965) De la division du travail social (trans. G Simpson). London: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R (1986) Law’s Empire. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Fischer-Lescano, A and Teubner, G (2003) ‘Regime-Collisions: The Vain Search for Legal Unity in the Fragmentation of Global Law’. Michigan Journal of International Law, 25(4), 999–1046.Google Scholar
Foucault, M (2000) ‘Governmentality’ in Essential Works of Foucault 1954–1984. Vol. III, Power. New York: New Press, pp. 201–22.Google Scholar
Foucault, M (2004) The Birth of Biopolitics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Fuller, LL (1964) The Morality of Law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Galbraith, JK (1987) A History of Economics: The Past as the Present. London: H. Hamilton.Google Scholar
Golia, A and Teubner, G (2021) ‘Societal Constitutionalism: Background, Theory, Debates’. Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law, 1–55.Google Scholar
Gorz, A (1989) Critique of Economic Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Guibentif, P (2016) ‘Rights in Niklas Luhmann’s Systems Theory’ in Harste, G (ed.), Law and Intersystemic Communication: Understanding ‘Structural Coupling’. New York: Routledge, pp. 255–88.Google Scholar
Habermas, J (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J (1995) Between Facts and Norms, Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J (2001) ‘Constitutional Democracy: A Paradoxical Union of Contradictory Principles?’ Political Theory, 29(6), 766–81.Google Scholar
Hart, HLA (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Harvey, D (2003) The New Imperialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joerges, C, Kjaer, PF and Ralli, T (2011) ‘A New Type of Conflicts Law as Constitutional Form in the Postnational Constellation’. Transnational Legal Theory, 2(2), 153–65.Google Scholar
Julius, AJ (2006) ‘Nagel’s Atlas’. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 34(2), 176–92.Google Scholar
Kahn-Freund, O (1954) ‘The Legal Framework’ in Flanders, A. and Clegg, H. (eds.), The System of Industrial Relations in Great Britain. Oxford, Blackwell, p. 1.Google Scholar
Kingsbury, B (2009) ‘The Concept of “Law” in Global Administrative Law’. European Journal of International Law, 20(1), 3–57.Google Scholar
Kjaer, PF (2014) Constitutionalism in the Global Realm: A Sociological Approach. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kumm, M (2013) ‘The Cosmopolitan Turn in Constitutionalism: An Integrated Conception of Public Law’. Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, 20(2), 605–28.Google Scholar
Laclau, E (1996) ‘Why Do Empty Signifiers Matter to Politics?’ in Emancipation(s). London: Verso.Google Scholar
Lindahl, H (2013) Fault Fines of Globalization: Legal Order and the Politics of A-legality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Loughlin, M and Walker, N (eds.) (2007) The Paradox of Constitutionalism: Constituent Power and Constitutional Form. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1965) Grundrechte als Institution. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1971) ‘Die Weltgesellschaft’. Archiv für Rechts- und Sozialphilosophie/Archives for Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy, 57(1), 1–35.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1972) The Sociological Theory of Law (trans. E King-Utz and M Albrow). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1982) The Differentiation of Society (trans. S Holmes and C Larmore). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1986a) Ecological Communication (trans. J Bednarz). Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1986b) ‘The Self-Reproduction of Law and Its Limits’ in Teubner, G (ed.), Autopoietic Law: A New Approach to Law and Society. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 60–81.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1989) Gesellschaftstruktur und Semantic II. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1990a) Political Theory in the Welfare State. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1990b) ‘Verfassung als evolutionare Errungenschaft’.Rechtshistorisches Journal, 9, 176–220.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1995a/1984) Social Systems (trans. J Bednarz, Jr., with D Baecker). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1995b) ‘Inklusion und Exklusion’ in Soziologische Aufklärung. Vol. 6. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, pp. 237–64.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (1997) ‘Globalization or World Society: How to Conceive of Modern Society?’ International Review of Sociology, 7(1), 67–79.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (2004) Law as a Social System (trans. K Ziegert). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Luhmann, N (2015) Politische Soziologie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Lukács, G (1923/1971) History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectics (trans. R Livingstone). London: Merlin.Google Scholar
MacCormick, DN (1981) H L A Hart. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malthus, T (1992/1798) Malthus: ‘An Essay on the Principle of Population’. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marx, K (1843/2000) ‘On the Jewish Question’ in MacLellan, D. (ed.), Karl Marx: Selected Writings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 46–63.Google Scholar
Möller, K (2012) The Global Model of Constitutional Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mulhall, S (2001) Inheritance and Originality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, T (2005) ‘The Problem of Global Justice’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 33(2), 113–47.Google Scholar
Neves, M (2001) ‘From the Autopoiesis to the Allopoiesis of Law’. Journal of Law and Society, 28(2), 242–64.Google Scholar
Neves, M (2013) Transconstitutionalism. Oxford: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Parsons, T (1937) The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Polanyi, K (1944) The Great Transformation. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J (1997) ‘The Idea of Public Reason Revisited’. University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 766–807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roll, E (1956) A History of Economic Thought. London: Faber.Google Scholar
Rosa, H (2005) ‘The Speed of Global Flows and the Pace of Democratic Politics’. New Political Science, 27(4), 445–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosanvallon, P (2000) The New Social Question: Rethinking the Welfare State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Savage, M (2021) The Return of Inequality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simitis, S (1986) ‘Juridification of Labor Relations’. Comparative Labor Law, 7(2), 93–142.Google Scholar
Slaughter, AM (2005) A New World Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stone-Sweet, A (2012) ‘A Cosmopolitan Legal Order: Constitutional Pluralism and Rights Adjudication in Europe’. Global Constitutionalism, 1(1), 53–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streeck, W (2014) Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Supiot, A (2007) Homo Juridicus: On the Anthropological Function of the Law (trans. S Brown). London: Verso. (Originally Seuil, 2005.)Google Scholar
Supiot, A (2017) Governance by Numbers: The Making of a Legal Model of Allegiance. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Supiot, A (2006) ‘Law and Labour’. New Left Review, 39, 109–21.Google Scholar
Teubner, G (1983) ‘Substantive and Reflexive Elements in Modern Law’. Law & Society Review, 17, 239–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G (1987) ‘Juridification: Concepts, Aspects, Limits, Solutions’ in Teubner, G (ed.), Juridification of Social Spheres. Berlin: de Gruyter, pp. 3–42.Google Scholar
Teubner, G (2006) ‘The Anonymous Matrix: Human Rights Violations by “Private” Transnational Actors’. Modern Law Review, 69, 327–46.Google Scholar
Teubner, G (2011a) ‘Constitutionalising Polycontexturality’. Social and Legal Studies, 20, 209–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teubner, G (2011b) ‘A Constitutional Moment? The Logics of “Hitting the Bottom”’ in Kjaer, P, Teubner, G and Febbrajo, A (eds.), The Financial Crisis in Constitutional Perspective: The Dark Side of Functional Differentiation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 9–51.Google Scholar
Teubner, G (2012) Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, EP (1963) The Making of the English Working Class. London: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Thornhill, C (2006) ‘Luhmann’s Political Theory: Politics after Metaphysics?’ in King, M and Thornhill, C (eds.), Luhmann on Law and Politics. Oxford: Hart, 75–100.Google Scholar
Thornhill, C (2012) ‘Sociological Enlightenments and the Sociology of Political Philosophy’. Revue internationale de philosophie, 1, 55–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thornhill, C (2016) ‘On Norms as Social Facts: A View from Historical Political Science’ in Rasch, W. (ed.), ‘Tragic Choices’: Luhmann on Law and States of Exception. Oldenbourg: De Gruyter, pp. 47–67.Google Scholar
Thornhill, C (2018) The Sociology of Law and the Global Transformation of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuori, K (2011) Ratio and Voluntas: The Tension between Reason and Will in Law. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Tuori, K and Tuori, K (2014) The Eurozone Crisis: A Constitutional Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Unger, RM (1996) ‘Legal Analysis as Institutional Imagination’. Modern Law Review, 59(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
van der Walt, J (2020) The Concept of Liberal Democratic Law. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Veitch, S (2007) Law and Irresponsibility: On the Legitimation of Human Suffering. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Verschraegen, G (2006) ‘Systems Theory and the Paradox of Human Rights’ in King, M and Thornhill, C (eds.), Luhmann on Law and Politics. Oxford: Hart, pp. 101–25.Google Scholar
Verschraegen, G (2002). ‘Human Rights and Modern Society: A Sociological Analysis from the Perspective of Systems Theory’. Journal of Law and Society, 29(2), 258–81.Google Scholar
Walker, N (2002) ‘The Idea of Constitutional Pluralism’. Modern Law Review, 65(3), 317–59.Google Scholar
Walker, N (2010) ‘Multilevel Constitutionalism: Looking beyond the German Debate’ in Tuori, K and Sankari, S. (eds.), The Many Constitutions of Europe. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 143–68.Google Scholar
Walker, N (2014) Intimations of Global Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walzer, M (1983) Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weber, M (1978) Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M (1946) ‘Science as a Vocation’. In Tauber, AI (ed.), Science and the Quest for Reality: Main Trends of the Modern World. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 382–94.Google Scholar
Weber, M (2002/1905) The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Weil, D (2014) The Fissured Workplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wood, EM (1981) ‘The Separation of the Economic and the Political in Capitalism’. New Left Review, 127, 65–95.Google Scholar

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The Differentiation and Autonomy of Law
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

The Differentiation and Autonomy of Law
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

The Differentiation and Autonomy of Law
Available formats
×