Element contents
Series: Elements in Applied Linguistics
Discourse, Materiality, and Agency within Everyday Social Interactions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 December 2025
Summary
This Element investigates the interplay between language, discourse, and materiality by focusing on everyday social practices within corner shops and markets in Sydney, Australia. Drawing on linguistic ethnography and data from interactions involving objects, talk, and people, it explores how discourse and materiality are co-constituted. Employing theoretical perspectives from actor-network theory and the concept of mediational means/tools, the study reconceptualizes the role of non-human entities in meaning-making processes. It demonstrates that objects actively participate in shaping cultural practices and social dynamics, offering new insights that broaden applied linguistics' engagement with materiality. By treating objects as agents in discourse, this Element highlights the entanglement of language, agency, and the material world. It foregrounds the dynamic relationships between humans and non-humans in everyday communicative practices, bringing to the fore the significance of material conditions in the production of meaning and interaction.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in Applied LinguisticsOnline ISBN: 9781009675390Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 08 January 2026
References
Adekunle, B., & Filson, G. (2020). Understanding halal food market: Resolving asymmetric information. Food Ethics, 5(1–2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41055-020–00072-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agar, M. H. (1997). Ethnography: An overview. Substance Use & Misuse, 32(9), 1155–1173. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826089709035470.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agha, A. (2007a). The object called ‘language’ and the subject of linguistics. Journal of English Linguistics, 35(3), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/0075424207304240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, A. (2007b). Recombinant selves in mass mediated spacetime. Language & Communication, 27(3), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agha, A. (2011). Meet mediatization. Language & communication, 31(3), 163–170.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2011.03.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ang, I. (2004). Between Asia and the West: The cultural politics of food. Life Writing, 1(1), 147–153. www.tandfonline.com/action/showCitFormats?doi=10.1080/10408340308518248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, A. (1986). Introduction: Commodities and the politics of value. In Appadurai, A. (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 3–63). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Appadurai, A. (2015). Mediants, materiality, normativity. Public Culture, 27(2), 221–237. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-2841832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronin, L., & Ó Laoire, M. (2013). The material culture of multilingualism: Moving beyond the linguistic landscape. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2012.679734.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auger, N., & Dervin, F. (2021). Special issue: A discourse toolbox for working on interculturality in education. International Journal of Bias, Identity and Diversities in Education (IJBIDE), 1(6), vi–x.Google Scholar
Badwan, K., & Hall, E. (2020). Walking along in sticky places: Post-humanist and affective insights from a reflective account of two young women in Manchester, UK. Language and Intercultural Communication, 20(3), 225–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2020.1715995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2021). Retrieved February 20, 2025, from http://www.abs.gov.au.Google Scholar
Bailey, B. (2000). Communicative behavior and conflict between African-American customers and Korean immigrant retailers in Los Angeles. Discourse & Society, 11(1), 86–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926500011001004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtin, M. (1982). The dialogic imagination: Four essays (Trans. Emerson, C. & Holquist, M. ; Ed. Holquist, M. ). University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831. www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/345321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnes, A. (2017). Telling stories: The role of graphic design and branding in the creation of ‘authenticity’ within food packaging. International Journal of Food Design, 2(2), 183–202. https://doi.org/10.1386/ijfd.2.2.183_1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R., & Briggs, C. L. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59–88. www.jstor.org/stable/2155959.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Benso, S. (2000). The face of things: A different side of ethics. State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Blackledge, A., & Creese, A. (2017). Translanguaging and the body. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 250–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A critical introduction. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J., & Backus, A. (2013). Superdiverse repertoires and the individual. In d. Saint-Georges, I. & Weber, J.-J. (Eds.), Multilingualism and multimodality: Current challenges for educational studies (pp. 9–32). Brill.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J. & De Fina, A. (2017). Chronotopic identities: On the spacetime organization of who we are. In Fina, A. De, Ikizoglu, D. and Wegner, J. (eds) Diversity and Superdiversity: Sociocultural Linguistic Perspectives (pp. 1–15). Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977a). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In Karabel, J. & Halsey, A. H. (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487–511). Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1977b). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, P. (1985). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2005). Identity and interaction: A sociocultural linguistic approach. Discourse Studies, 7(4–5), 585–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bucholtz, M., & Hall, K. (2016). Embodied sociolinguistics. In Coupland, N. (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical debates (pp. 173–197). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (1984). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. The Sociological Review, 32(1), 196–233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1984.tb00113.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M. (1991). Techno-economic networks and irreversibility. In John, L. (Ed.), A Sociology of monsters: Essays on power, technology and domination (pp. 132–161). Routledge.Google Scholar
Callon, M. (1999). Actor-network theory – the market test. The Sociological Review, 47(S1), 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-954X.1999.tb03488.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callon, M., & Latour, B. (1981). Unscrewing the big leviathan: How actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. In Cetina, K. K. & Cicourel, A. V. (Eds.), Advances in social theory and methodology: Towards an integration of micro-and macro-sociologies (pp. 277–303). Routledge.Google Scholar
Callon, M., & Muniesa, F. (2005). Peripheral vision: Economic markets as calculative collective devices. Organization Studies, 26(8), 1229–1250. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605056393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canagarajah, S. (2018). Translingual practice as spatial repertoires: Expanding the paradigm beyond structuralist orientations. Applied Linguistics, 39(1), 31–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amx041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caron, A. H., & Caronia, L. (2007). Moving cultures: Mobile communication in everyday life. McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caronia, L., & Cooren, F. (2014). Decentering our analytical position: The dialogicity of things. Discourse & Communication, 8(1), 41–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1750481313503226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavanaugh, J. R. (2007). Making salami, producing Bergamo: The transformation of value. Ethnos, 72(2), 149–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00141840701387853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavanaugh, J. R., & Shankar, S. (2014). Producing authenticity in global capitalism: Language, materiality, and value. American Anthropologist, 116(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerulo, K. A. (2009). Nonhumans in social interaction. Annual Review of Sociology, 35(1), 531–552. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-070308-120008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cerulo, K. A. (2011). Social interaction: Do non-humans count? Sociology Compass, 5(9), 775–791. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9020.2011.00404.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Cooren, F. (2004). Textual agency: How texts do things in organizational settings. Organization, 11(3), 373–393. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508404041998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L. (2024). The semiotic repertoire of dairy cows. Language in Society, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0047404524000460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornips, L., & van Koppen, M. (2024). Multimodal dairy cow–human interaction in an intensive farming context. Language Sciences, 101, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2023.101587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daston, L. (2004). Introduction: Speechless. In Daston, L. (Ed.), Things that talk: Object lessons from art and science (pp. 9–24). Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
De Fina, A. (2015). Narrative and identities. In Fina, A. De & Georgakopoulou, A. (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis (pp. 349–368). Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A., & Georgakopoulou, A. (2015). Introduction. In Fina, A. De & Georgakopoulou, A. (Eds.), The handbook of narrative analysis (pp. 1–17). Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. L. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Di Giovine, M. A., & Brulotte, R. L. (2016). Introduction food and foodways as cultural heritage. In Brulotte, R. L. & Giovine, M. A. D. (Eds.), Edible identities: Food as cultural heritage (pp. 1–27). Routledge.Google Scholar
Doane, J., & Hodges, D. (1987). Nostalgia and sexual difference: The resistance to contemporary feminism. Routledge.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (2002). Purity and danger: An analysis of concepts of pollution and taboo. Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
Dovchin, S. (2021). Translanguaging, emotionality, and English as a second language immigrants: Mongolian background women in Australia. Tesol Quarterly, 55(3), 839–865. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elabdali, R. (2024). Yalla Nutbikh ‘Let’s Cook’: Negotiating emotions of belonging through food in heritage language classrooms. Modern Language Journal, 108(S1), 56–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gell, A. (1998). Art and agency: An anthropological theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern University.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1979). The sense of order: A study in the psychology of decorative art. Phaidon Press.Google Scholar
Gosden, C., & Marshall, Y. (1999). The cultural biography of objects. World Archaeology, 31(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.1999.9980439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. (1964). Linguistic and social interaction in two communities. American Anthropologist, 66(6), 137–153. www.jstor.org/stable/668168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gumperz, J. (2015). Interactional sociolinguistics: A personal perspective. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E., & Schiffrin, D. (Eds.), The handbook of discourse analysis (pp. 309–323). John Wiley & Sons.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2019). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4th ed.). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkness, N. (2015). The pragmatics of qualia in practice. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44(1), 573–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvey, D. (1990). Between space and time: Reflections on the geographical imagination. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 80(3), 418–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.1990.tb00305.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henare, A., Holbraad, M., & Wastell, S. (Eds.). (2007). Thinking through things: Theorising artefacts ethnographically. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkyns, S. (2025). Sticky objects and places: Entangled emotions in an English-Medium university educationscape. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 35(3), 1019–1030. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijal.12704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskins, J. (2006). Agency, biography and objects. In Tilley, C., Keane, W., Kuechler, S., Rowlands, M., & Spyer, P. (Eds.), Handbook of material culture (pp. 74–84). Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izadi, D. (2015). Spatial engagement in Persian ethnic shops in Sydney. Multimodal Communication, 4(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2015-0005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izadi, D. (2017). Semiotic resources and mediational tools in Merrylands, Sydney, Australia: The case of Persian and Afghan shops. Social Semiotics, 27(4), 495–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1334401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izadi, D. (2019). ‘Are these ones to taste?’: Critical moments in Persian shops in Sydney. In Mirvahedi, S. H. (Ed.), The sociolinguistics of Iran’s languages at home and abroad: The case of Persian, Azerbaijani, and Kurdish (pp. 169–196). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izadi, D. (2020). The spatial and temporal dimensions of interactions. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izadi, D. (2023). Exploring the phenomenology of shopping as social practice: An inquiry into the multimodal and linguistic repertoires in markets in Sydney. In Rasmussen, G. & v. Leeuwen, T. (Eds.), Multimodality and social interaction in online and offline shopping (pp. 13–39). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izadi, D., & Luke, A. (2025). Dialogues of materiality: Unravelling the agency of discourse and objects. Multimodal Communication, 14(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2024-0105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Izadi, D., & Parvaresh, V. (2016). The framing of the linguistic landscapes of Persian shop signs in Sydney. Linguistic Landscape, 2(2), 182–205. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.2.2.04iza.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Järlehed, J., Milani, T. M., & Rosendal, T. (2023). Introducing the political economy of language in place/space. Linguistic Landscape, 9(3), 219–225. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.23039.jar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Järlehed, J., & Moriarty, M. (2018). Culture and class in a glass: Scaling the semiofoodscape. Language & Communication, 62, 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2018.05.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, A. (2015). Word cities and language objects: ‘Love’ sculptures and signs as shifter. Linguistic Landscape, 1(1/2), 75–94. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.1-2.05jaw.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaworski, A., & Thurlow, C. (2010). Introducing semiotic landscapes. In A. Jaworski & C. Thurlow(Eds.), Semiotic landscapes: Language, image, space (pp. 1–40). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Jocuns, A., & Groot, F. O. d. (2025). Geographies of discourse revisited. Multimodal Communication, 14(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1515/mc-2024-0112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, J., & Baumann, S. (2014). Foodies: Democracy and distinction in the gourmet foodscape (2nd ed.). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnstone, B. (2004). Place, globalization, and linguistic variation. In Fought, C. (Ed.), Sociolinguistic variation: Critical reflections (pp. 65–83). Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karimzad, F., & Catedral, L. (2021). Chronotopes and migration: Language, social imagination, and behavior. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karrebæk, M. S. (2014). Rye bread and halal: Enregisterment of food practices in the primary classroom. Language & Communication, 34, 17–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2013.08.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karrebæk, M. S., & Maegaard, M. (2024). The language of smoked fish: The production and circulation of meanings and values of ‘Bornholmian Food’. Language in Society, 54(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S004740452400068X.Google Scholar
Keane, W. (2001). Money is no object: Materiality, desire, and modernity in an Indonesian society. In Myers, F. R. (Ed.), The empire of things: Regimes of value and material culture (pp. 65–90). School of American Research.Google Scholar
Keane, W. (2003). Semiotics and the social analysis of material things. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00010-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kebabi, A. (2024). ‘Identity’ is not only about human relations: The relevance of human-to-non-human interaction in ‘identity’ articulation. Language and Intercultural Communication, 24(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2023.2252779.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kopytoff, I. (1986). The cultural biography of things: Commoditization as process. In Appadurai, A. (Ed.), The social life of things: Commodities in cultural perspective (pp. 64–91). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lamb, G., & Higgins, C. (2020). Posthumanism and its implications for discourse studies. In Fina, A. D. & Georgakopoulou, A. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of discourse studies (pp. 350–370). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1992). Where are the missing masses? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. In Law, J. & Bijker, W. E. (Eds.), Shaping technology/building Society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 225–258). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1996a). On actor-network theory: A few clarifications. Soziale welt, 47(4), 369–381. www.jstor.org/stable/40878163.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (1996b). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 228–245. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0304_2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1996c). Pursuing the discussion of interobjectivity with a few friends. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3(4), 266–269. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327884mca0304_6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge.Google Scholar
Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B., & Venn, C. (2002). Morality and technology. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(5–6), 247–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Law, J. (1987). Technology and heterogeneous engineering: The case of Portuguese expansion. In Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (Eds.), The social construction of technological: New directions in the sociology and history of technology studies (pp. 111–134). The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lempert, M., & Perrino, S. (2007). Entextualization and the ends of temporality. Language & Communication, 27(3), 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2007.01.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, J. J. (2016). Shop sign as monument: The discursive recontextualization of a neon sign. Linguistic Landscape: An International Journal, 2(3), 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.2.3.01lou.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lou, J. J. (2017). Spaces of consumption and senses of place: A geosemiotic analysis of three markets in Hong Kong. Social Semiotics, 27(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1334403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, J. S. (2016). Looking at food practices and taste across the class divide. Food, Culture & Society, 19(1), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/15528014.2016.1144995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, P. (2017). The semiotic ecology of drinks and talk in Georgia. In Cavanaugh, J. R. & Shankar, S. (Eds.), Language and materiality: Ethnographic and theoretical explorations (pp. 226–247). Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mapes, G. (2021). Elite authenticity: Remaking distinction in food discourse. Oxford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthee, R. (1996). From coffee to tea: Shifting patterns of consumption in Qajar Iran. Journal of World History, 7(2), 199–230. www.jstor.org/stable/20078676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. (2005). Materiality: An introduction. In Miller, D. (Ed.), Materiality (pp. 1–50). Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mondada, L. (2016). Challenges of multimodality: Language and the body in social interaction. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 20(3), 336–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.1_12177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mondada, L. (2018). The multimodal interactional organization of tasting: Practices of tasting cheese in gourmet shops. Discourse Studies, 20(6), 743–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445618793439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, G. (2002). Comfortable and relaxed: Furnishing the home and nation. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies, 16(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/10304310220120975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noble, G. (2004). Accumulating being. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 7(2), 233–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367877904043239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, S. (2004). Analyzing multimodal interaction: A methodological framework. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, S. (2011). Identity in (inter)action: Introducing multimodal (inter)action. de Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norris, S., & Jones, R. H. (Eds.). (2005). Discourse in action: Introducing mediated discourse analysis. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2017). Translanguaging and semiotic assemblages. International Journal of Multilingualism, 14(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/14790718.2017.1315810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pennycook, A. (2018b). Posthumanist applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 39(4), 445–461. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amw016.Google Scholar
Pennycook, A., & Otsuji, E. (2015). Making scents of the landscape. Linguistic Landscape, 1(3), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1075/ll.1.3.01pen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietikäinen, S., & Hegel, C. (2021). Assembling success: Desire, worker mobility, and value creation in Finnish ice hockey. Anthropology of Work Review, 42(2), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/awr.12221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pietikäinen, S., Jaffe, A., Kelly-Holmes, H., & Coupland, N. (2016). Sociolinguistics from the periphery: Small languages in new circumstances. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rampton, B. (2007). Neo-Hymesian linguistic ethnography in the United Kingdom. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 11(5), 584–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9841.2007.00341.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, K., & Cavanaugh, J. (2017). Tasty talk, expressive food: An introduction to the semiotics of food and language. Semiotic Review Online, 5. https://doi.org/https:==www.semioticreview.com=ojs=index.php=sr=article=view=1.Google Scholar
Ros i Solé, C. (2025). Material interculturality: Making sense with everyday objects. Routledge.Google Scholar
Rymes, B. (2010). Classroom discourse analysis: A focus on communicative repertoires. In Hornberger, N. H. & McKay, S. L. (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language education (pp. 528–546). Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Sarangi, S. (2007). The anatomy of interpretation: Coming to terms with the analyst’s paradox in professional discourse studies. Text & Talk, 27(5–6), 567–584. https://doi.org/10.1515/TEXT.2007.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saurma-Jeltsch, L. E. (2010). About the agency of things, of objects and artefacts. In Saurma-Jeltsch, d. L. E. & Eisenbeiß, A. (Eds.), The power of things and the flow of cultural transformations (pp. 10–22). Deutscher Kunstverlag.Google Scholar
Sayes, E. (2012). From the sacred to the sacred object: Girard, Serres, and Latour on the ordering of the human collective. Techne: Research in Philosophy & Technology, 16(2). https://doi.org/10.5840/techne201216211.Google Scholar
Sayes, E. (2014). Actor–Network Theory and methodology: Just what does it mean to say that nonhumans have agency? Social Studies of Science, 44(1), 134–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312713511867.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scollon, R. (2013). Geographies of discourse: Action across layered spaces. In Saint-Georges, I. D. & Weber, J.-J. (Eds.), Multilingualism and multimodality: Current challenges for educational studies (pp. 183–198). Sense.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R., & Scollon, S. W. (2003). Discourses in place: Language in the material world. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scollon, R. & Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus analysis: Discourse and the emerging internet. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankar, S. (2006). Metaconsumptive practices and the circulation of objectifications. Journal of Material Culture, 11(3), 293–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359183506068807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankar, S., & Cavanaugh, J. R. (2012). Language and materiality in global capitalism. Annual Review of Anthropology, 41(1), 355–369. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-092611-145811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shankar, S., & Cavanaugh, J. R. (2017). Toward a theory of language materiality: An introduction. In Shankar, S. & Cavanaugh, J. R. (Eds.), Language and materiality: Ethnographic and theoretical explorations (pp. 1–28). Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language & Communication, 23(3–4), 193–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0271-5309(03)00013-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2021). The dialectics of indexical semiosis: Scaling up and out from the ‘actual’ to the ‘virtual’. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 21(272), 13–45. https://doi.org/10.1515/ijsl-2021-2124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M., & Urban, G. (Eds.). (1996). Natural histories of discourse. The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tannock, S. (1995). Nostalgia critique. Cultural Studies, 9(3), 453–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502389500490511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2016). Queering critical discourse studies or/and performing ‘post-class’ ideologies. Critical Discourse Studies, 13(5), 485–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2015.1122646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thurlow, C. (2020). Expanding our sociolinguistic horizons? Geographical thinking and the articulatory potential of commodity chain analysis. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 24(3), 350–368. https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing social semiotics: An introductory textbook. Routledge.Google Scholar
Zhu, H., Wei, L., & Lyons, A. (2017). Polish shop (ping) as translanguaging space. Social Semiotics, 27(4), 411–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2017.1334390.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
- 2
- Cited by