Element contents
The Earth Intoxicated on Imagination
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 31 July 2025
Summary
The aim of this Element is to forge new conceptual tools to give more ecological power to the human imagination. Imagination, both an innovative force and one that distances and blinds, is central to the ecological crisis as well as its potential resolution. Human imagination creates a bubble of denial, fostering the illusion of a smooth, reassuring, controlled, and neatly compartmentalized world. This Element critically contrasts the harmful modern concepts of reality and imagination with a more grounded “earthly” and “animal” imagination. It proposes to overcome the tension between two currents in environmental thought: those advocating imagination for utopian transformation, and proponents of realism, urging confrontation with the material world beyond anthropocentrism. Through analysis of key contemporary environmental work alongside insights from ethology and biosemiotics, the Element underpins the concept of “animal imagination,” offering an alternative approach to environmental imagination and activism that fosters deeper engagement with the living world.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009420006Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 28 August 2025
References
Abram, D. 1991. “The Mechanical and the Organic: On the Impact of Metaphor in Science.” In Schneider, S. and Boston, P. (eds.), Scientists on Gaia. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp. 67–74.Google Scholar
Apperly, I. A. 2012. “What Is ‘Theory of Mind’? Concepts, Cognitive Processes and Individual Differences.” The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 65, no. 5, 825–39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Attridge, D. 2004. “Ethical Modernism: Servants as Others in J. M. Coetzee’s Early Fiction.“ Poetics Today, 25, no. 4, 653–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bate, J. 1989. Shakespeare and the English Romantic Imagination. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaut, J. M. 1993. The Colonizer’s Model of the World: Geographical Diffusionism and Eurocentric History. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Blough, P. M. 1992. “Detectability and Choice during Visual Search: Joint Effects of Sequential Priming and Discriminability.” Animal Learning and Behaviour, 20, 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bond, A. B. 1983. “Visual Search and Selection of Natural Stimuli in the Pigeon: The Attention Threshold Hypothesis.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition 9, 292–306.Google ScholarPubMed
Bond, A. B. 2007. “The Evolution of Color Polymorphism: Crypticity, Searching Images, and Apostatic Selection.” Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 38, 489–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, P. 1985. “‘This Thing of Darkness I Acknowledge Mine’: The Tempest and the Discourse of Colonialism.” In Dollimore, J. and Sinfield, A. (eds.), Political Shakespeare: New Essays Cultural Materialism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 48–71.Google Scholar
Buell, L. 1996. The Environmental Imagination: Thoreau, Nature Writing, and the Formation of American Culture. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. W. and Whiten, A. (Eds.). 1998. Machiavellian Intelligence: Social Expertise and the Evolution of Intellect in Monkeys, Apes, and Humans. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cabnal, L. 2010. “Acercamiento a la construcción de la propuesta de pensamiento epistémico de las mujeres indígenas feministas comunitarias de Abya Yala.” In Feminismos diversos: el feminismo comunitario. Madrid: Acsur Las Segovias, pp. 10–25. Available at: https://porunavidavivible.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/feminismos-comunitario-lorena-cabnal.pdf. Accessed on: October 16, 2018.Google Scholar
Cabnal, L. 2015. “Corps-territoire et territoire-Terre: le féminisme communautaire au Guatemala.” Interview by J. Falquet. Cahiers du Genre, 2015/2(59), 73–89. Éditions Association Féminin Masculin Recherches.Google Scholar
Calarco, M. 2020. Beyond the Anthropological Difference. Elements in Environmental Humanities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Celso, G., Ott, E., and Yorke., J. A. 1987. “Chaos, Strange Attractors, and Fractal Basin Boundaries in Nonlinear Dynamics.” Science, 238, no. 4827, 632–8.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, D. 2021. The Climate of History in a Planetary Age. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheney, K. L. 2008. “The Role of Avoidance Learning in an Aggressive Mimicry System.” Behavioral Ecology, 19, no. 3, 583–8, https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, C. W. and Dukas, R.. 2003. “The Behavioral Ecology of a Cognitive Constraint: Limited Attention.” Behavioral Ecology, 14, no. 2 (March): 151–6. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/14.2.151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, T. 2015. Ecocriticism on the Edge: The Anthropocene as a Threshold Concept. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Collard, R. C., Dempsey, J., and Sundberg, J.. 2015. “A Manifesto for Abundant Futures.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 105, no. 2, 322–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corfield, C. 1985. “Why Does Prospero Abjure His ‘Rough Magic’?” Shakespeare Quarterly, 36, no. 1 (Spring), 31–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curry, W. C. 1959. Shakespeare’s Philosophical Patterns. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.Google Scholar
Del Fa, S. 2023. “Comment les Soulèvements de la Terre fédèrent une nouvelle écologie radicale et sociale.” In The Conversation, April 27.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. 1994. Difference and Repetition. Eng. trans. P. Patton. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. and Guattari, F.. 1988. A Thousand Plateaus. Trans. B. Massumi. London: Athlone.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. 1995. “Do Animals Have Beliefs?” In Roitblat, H. (ed.), Comparative Approaches to Cognitive Sciences. London: MIT Press, pp. 111–8.Google Scholar
Despret, V. 2004. “The Body We Care For: Figures of Anthropo-Zoo-Genesis.” Body and Society. Special Issue on “Bodies on Trial,” 10, nos. 2–3, 111–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, C. 2008. “The Difficulty of Reality and the Difficulty of Philosophy.” In Cavell, S., Diamond, C., McDowell, J., Hacking, I., and Wolfe, C., Philosophy and Animal Life. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 43–90.Google Scholar
Driver, P. M. and A. Humphries, D.. 1988. Protean Behaviour: The Biology of Unpredictability. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Ducouret, P. A. Romano, A. N., Dreiss, P. et al. 2019. “The Art of Diplomacy in Vocally Negotiating Barn Owl Siblings.” Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, Vol. 7 (September) (Online).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrenreich, B. and English, D.. 1973. Witches, Midwives, & Nurses: A History of Women Healers. Second Ed. Old Westbury, NY: The Feminist Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Extinction, Rebellion. 2022. “We Quit.” December 31, https://extinctionrebellion.uk/2022/12/31/we-quit/.Google Scholar
Federici, S. 2004. Caliban and the Witch: Women, the Body, and Primitive Accumulation. Brooklyn, NY: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
Frederickson, M. E. 2017. “Mutualisms Are Not on the Verge of Breakdown.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 32, no. 546, 727–34.Google ScholarPubMed
Frisch, S. 2014. “How Cognitive Neuroscience Could Be More Biological – and What It Might Learn from Clinical Neuropsychology.” In Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, Vol. 8, 541.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gago, V. 2019. La potencia feminista: o el deseo de cambiarlo todo. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A. 2016. The Great Derangement: Climate Change and the Unthinkable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Giglioni, G. 2010. “Fantasy Islands: Utopia, the Tempest, and New Atlantis as Places of Controlled Credulousness.” In Kavey, A. B. (ed.), World-Building and the Early Modern Imagination. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gómez-Moreno, J. M. U. 2019. “The ‘Mimic’ or ‘Mimetic’ Octopus? A Cognitive-Semiotic Study of Mimicry and Deception in Thaumoctopus Mimicus.” Biosemiotics, 12 (December), 441–67.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1987. Time’s Arrow, Time’s Cycle: Myth and Metaphor in the Discovery of Geological Time. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Herzing, L. D. 2015. “Synchronous and Rhythmic Vocalizations and Correlated Underwater Behavior of Free-Ranging Atlantic Spotted Dolphins (Stenella frontalis) and Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in the Bahamas.” Animal Behavior and Cognition, 2, 14–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofmannsthal, H. von. 1979. Der Dichter und diese Zeit, Gesammelte Werke in zehn Einzelbänden, Band 8, Reden und Aufsätze I, Fischer, Frankfurt.Google Scholar
Hofmannsthal, H. von. 2008. “The Letter of Lord Chandos.” In DonaldMcClatchy, J. (ed.), The Whole Difference: Selected Writings of Hugo von Hofmannsthal. Trans. T. Stern and J. Stern. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hsu, H. 2020. “The Search for New Words to Make Us Care about the Climate Crisis.” The New Yorker, February 21.Google Scholar
Husserl, E. 1973. Zur Phänomenologie der Intersubjektivität. Texte aus dem Nachlaß, Zweiter Teil: 1921–1928. The Hague: M. Nijoff.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jardine, J. 2014. “Husserl and Stein on the Phenomenology of Empathy: Perception and Explication.” Synthesis Philosophica, 29, no. 2, 273–88.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1998. Critique of Pure Reason. Trans. P. Guyer and A. W. Wood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kantorowicz, E. 1957. The King’s Two Bodies: A Study on Medieval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kastan, D. S. 2000. “‘The Duke of Milan / And His Brave Son’: Old Histories and New in The Tempest.” In Shakespeare, W., Graff, G., and Phelan, J. (eds.), The Tempest. A Case Study in Critical Controversy. Boston, NY: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Kaufman, A. B. and Kaufman, J. C.. 2015 (Eds). Animal Creativity and Innovation. London: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Keeling, P. and McCutcheon, J.. 2017. “Endosymbiosis: The Feeling Is Not Mutual.” Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, no. 434 (December) 75–9.Google Scholar
Kirchner, J. W. 1990. “Gaia Metaphor Unfalsifiable.” Nature, 345, no. 6275 (June) 470.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klopper, D. 2008. “‘We Are Not Made for Revelation’: Letters to Francis Bacon in the Postscript to J. M. Coetzee’s Elizabeth Costello.” English in Africa; Grahamstown, 35, no. 2 (October) 119–32.Google Scholar
Kononowicz, T. W., van Wassenhove, V., and Doyère, V.. 2022. “Rodents Monitor Their Error in Self-Generated Duration on a Single Trial Basis.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119, no. 9, (online).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Langmore, N. E., Maurer, G., Adcock, G., and Kilner, R. M.. 2008. “Socially Acquired Host-Specific Mimicry and the Evolution of Host Races in Horsfield’s Bronze-Cuckoo Chalcites Basalis.” Evolution, 62, no. 7 (July). 1689–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latour, B. 2009. Sur le culte des dieux faitiches: Suivi de Iconoclash. Paris: La Découverte.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Latour, B. 2017. Facing Gaia: Eight Lectures on the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2018. Down to Earth: Politics in the New Climatic Regime. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2019. “Extending the Domain of Freedom, or Why Is Gaia so Hard to Understand?” 45, no. 3: 659–680.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2020a. The Parliament of Things. Radboud University, November 23, 2020. Video. www.youtube.com/watch?v=zZF9gbQ7iCs&ab_channel=RadboudReflects.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 2020b. Bruno Latour, Entretien avec Andrew Todd, The Guardian, February 4, 2020.Google Scholar
Le Guin, U. K. 2007. “The Critics, the Monsters, and the Fantasists.” The Wordsworth Circle, 38, no. 1/2, 83-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Les Soulèvements de la Terre. 2023. “A celles et ceux qui ont marché à Sainte-Soline.” https://lessoulevementsdelaterre.org/blog/a-celles-et-ceux-qui-ont-marche-a-sainte-soline.Google Scholar
Lipps, T. 1907. “Das Wissen von fremden Ichen.” In Lipps, T., Psychologische Untersuchungen I. Leipzig: Engelmann, 694–722.Google Scholar
Longcore, T. 2018 “Rapid Assessment of Lamp Spectrum to Quantify Ecological Effects of Light at Night.” The Journal of Experimental Zoology – A, 329, nos. 8–9 (October), 694–722.Google ScholarPubMed
Lotman, J. and Clark, W.. 2005. “On the Semiosphere.” Semiotica: Sign Systems Studies, 13, no. 1, 205–26.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J. 1988. The Ages of Gaia: A Biography of Our Living Earth. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Lyons, J. D. 2005. Before Imagination: Embodied Thought from Montaigne to Rousseau. Redwood: Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maran, T. 2012. “Are Ecological Codes Archetypal Structures?” In Maran, T., Lindström, K., Magnus, R., and Tønnessen, M. (Eds.), Semiotics in the Wild: Essays in Honour of Kalevi Kull on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday. Tartu: University of Tartu Press, 147–56.Google Scholar
Maran, T. 2017. Mimicry and Meaning: Structure and Semiotics of Biological Mimicry. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maran, T. 2020. Ecosemiotics: The Study of Signs in Changing Ecologies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCreary, E. P. 1973. “Bacon’s Theory of Imagination Reconsidered.” The Huntington Library Quarterly, 36, no. 4 (August), 317–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meillassoux, Q. 2009. After Finitude: An Essay on the Necessity of Contingency. Trans. R. Brassier. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. 1960. The Structure of Behavior. Trans. Alden Fisher. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. 2010. Child Psychology and Pedagogy: The Sorbonne Lectures, 1949–1952. Trans. T. Welsh. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, M. 2012. Phenomenology of Perception. Trans. D. Landes. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mitra, M. N. 2019 “Less Talk, More Action.” Earth Island Journal 2029 (Winter), www.earthisland.org/journal/index.php/magazine/entry/less-talk-more-action/##.Google Scholar
Montaigne, M. de. 2006. “Of the Force of Imagination.” Trans. Charles Cotton. 1574. Quotidiana. Ed. Patrick Madden. December 26, 2006. July 30, 2024.Google Scholar
Mowat, B. A. 1981. “Prospero, Agrippa, and Hocus Pocus.” English Literary Renaissance, 11, no. 3 (Autumn), 281–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naess, A. 1973. “The Shallow and the Deep, Long-Range Ecology Movement: A Summary.” In Drengson, A. and Glasser, H. (eds.), Selected Works of Arne Naess, X. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 7–12.Google Scholar
Nagel, T. 1974. “What Is It Like to Be a Bat?” The Philosophical Review, 83, no. 4, 435–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nietzsche, F. 2020. “About Truth and Lie in the Extra-Moral Sense.” In Nietzsche’s Seven Notebooks from 1876. Trans. by D. F. Ferrer, Internet Archive.Google Scholar
Norris, M. 1985. Beasts of the Modern Imagination: Darwin, Nietzsche, Kafka, Ernst, and Lawrence. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, J. 1993. “Reasoning with the Senses: The Humanist Imagination.” South Central Review, 10, no. 2, 3–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
On ne dissout pas un soulèvement. 40 voix pour les Soulèvements de la Terre. 2023. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Onori, L. and Visconti, G.. 2012. “The GAIA Theory: From Lovelock to Margulis. From a Homeostatic to a Cognitive Autopoietic Worldview.” Rendiconti Lincei, June 26.Google Scholar
Paredes, J. 2011. Hilando Fino, desde el feminismo comunitario. La Paz: Comunidad Mujeres Creando Comunidad.Google Scholar
Parini, J. 1995. “The Greening of the Humanities.” The New York Times Magazine, October 29.Google Scholar
Pérez‐Manrique, A. and Gomila, A.. 2018. “The Comparative Study of Empathy: Sympathetic Concern and Empathic Perspective-Taking in Non-human Animals.” Biological Reviews, 93, no. 1, 248–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Plotinus. 1952. Enneads. Translated by S. Mackenna and B. S. Page https://classics.mit.edu/Plotinus/enneads.html.Google Scholar
Ponce-León, J. J. 2024. “Feminismos antiespecistas en Ecuador y Colombia: prácticas queer y veganismos decoloniales.” Íconos. Revista de Ciencias Sociales, 78, 177–97.Google Scholar
Ponce Toledo, R. I., Lopez-Garcia, P., and Moreira, D.. 2019. “Horizontal and Endosymbiotic Gene Transfer in Early Plastid Evolution.” The New Phytologist, 224, no. 2, 618–24.Google ScholarPubMed
Porter, S. S., Faber-Hammond, J., Montoya, A. P., Friesen, M. L., and Sackos, C.. 2019. “Dynamic Genomic Architecture of Mutualistic Cooperation in a Wild Population of Mesorhizobium.” The ISME Journal, 13, no. 2, 301–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roggema, R., Rodriguez, D., and Tillie, N. 2024. “When the Bear Comes to Town: How the City Could Create Nature.” Urban Planning and Construction, 2, no. 2, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sallis, J. 2012. Logic of Imagination: The Expanse of the Elemental. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartre, J. P. 2004. The Imaginary: A Phenomenological Psychology of the Imagination. Trans. J. Webber. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, O. J., Sylvén, M., Atwood, T. B. et al. 2023. “Trophic Rewilding Can Expand Natural Climate Solutions.” Nature Climate Change, 13, 324–33.Google Scholar
Schneider-Mayerson, M. and Bellamy, B. R. (Eds.). 2019. An Ecotopian Lexicon. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scholar, R. 2002. “La force de l’imagination de Montaigne: Camus, Malebranche, Pascal.” Littératures classiques, 45, 127–38.Google Scholar
Schünemann, B., Keller, J., Rakoczy, H., et al. 2021. “Dogs Distinguish Human Intentional and Unintentional Action.” Scientific Report, 11, 14967.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sepper, D. L. 2015. Understanding Imagination: The Reason of Images. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. 1979. A Midsummer Night’s Dream. Brooks, H. F. (ed.), The Arden Shakespeare, 2nd series. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, W. 2000. The Tempest. A Case Study in Critical Controversy. Graff, G. and Phelan, J. (eds.) . Boston, NY: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
Shettleworth, S. J. 1998. Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smuts, B. 2002. “Gestural Communication in Olive Baboons and Domes-tic Dogs.” In Bekoff, M., Allen, C., and Burghardt, G., (eds.), The Cognitive Animal Empirical and Theoretical Perspectives on Animal Cognition. Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 301–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smuts, B. 2021. “Encounters with. Animal Minds,” Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8, 8-28.Google Scholar
Socha, K. 2013. “The ‘Dreaded Comparisons’ and Speciesism: Leveling the Hierarchy of Suffering.” In Socha, K. and Blum, S. (eds.), Confronting Animal Exploitation: Grassroots Essays on Liberation and Veganism. Jefferson, NC: McFarland, 223-40.Google Scholar
Soper, K. 1995. What is Nature?: Culture, Politics and the Non-Human. Oxford and Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spiegel, M. 1996. The Dreaded Comparison: Human and Animal Slavery. New York: Mirror Books.Google Scholar
Spiller, E. 2009. “Shakespeare and the Making of Early Modern Science: Resituating Prospero’s Art.” South Central Review, 26, nos. 1 & 2 (Winter & Spring), 24–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Starhawk, . 1982. Dreaming the Dark: Magic, Sex, and Politics. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Starhawk, 1988. Truth or Dare: Encounters with Power, Authority, and Mystery. New York: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
Stengers, I. 2002. “Une politique de l’hérésie entretien avec Isabelle Stengers.” Interview by Grelet, S., Mangeot, P., and Potte-Bonneville, M.. Vacarme, no. 19. April 2.Google Scholar
Sweet, E. L. and Ortiz Escalante, S.. 2017. “Engaging territorio cuerpo-tierra through Body and Community Mapping: A Methodology for Making Communities Safer.” Gender, Place & Culture, 24, no. 4, 594–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomashow, M. 2002. Bringing the Biosphere Home: Learning to Perceive Global Environmental Change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Thomashow, M. 2003. “What Is the Ecological Imagination?”. MitchellTomashow.com. Accessed May 31, 2025. www.mitchelltomashow.com/blog/what-is-the-ecological-imagination.Google Scholar
Tinbergen, N. 1960. “The Natural Control of Insects in Pine Woods: Vol. I. Factors Influencing the Intensity of Predation by Songbirds.” Archives Neelandaises de Zoologie, 13, (online).Google Scholar
Tribble, E. 2022. “‘A Strange, Hollow, and Confused Noise’: Prospero’s ‘Start’ and Early Modern Magical Practices.” Shakespeare Quarterly, 72, nos. 3–4 (Fall–Winter), 229-53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uexküll, J. von. 2010. A Foray into the Worlds of Animals and Humans: With a Theory of Meaning. Trans. J. D. O’Neil. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Villanueva-Romero, D., Kerslake, L., and Flys-Junquera, C. (eds.) 2021. Imaginative Ecologies: Inspiring Change through the Humanities. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Westling, L. 2022. Deep History, Climate Change, and the Evolution of Human Culture. Elements in Environmental Humanities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whiten, A. 2021. “The Burgeoning Reach of Animal Culture.” Science 372, no. 6537, April 2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yusoff, K. 2019. A Billion Black Anthropocenes or None. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Zahavi, D. 2014. Self and Other: Exploring Subjectivity, Empathy, and Shame. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
- 1
- Cited by