Element contents
Environmental Recourse at the Multilateral Development Banks
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 09 November 2020
Summary
Global governance now provides people with recourse for harm through International Grievance Mechanisms, such as the Independent Accountability Mechanisms of the Multilateral Development Banks. Yet little is known about how such mechanisms work. This Element examines how IGMs provide recourse for infringements of three procedural environmental rights: access to information, access to participation, and access to justice in environmental matters, as well as environmental protections drawn from the United Nations Guiding Principles and the World Bank's protection standards. A content analysis of 394 original IAM claims details how people invoke these rights. The sections then unpack how the IAMs provide community engagement through 'problem solving', and 'compliance investigations' that identify whether the harm resulted from the MDBs. Using a database of all known submissions to the IAMs (1,052 claims from 1994 to mid-2019), this Element demonstrate how the IAMs enable people to air their grievances, without necessarily solving their problems.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108776646Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 03 December 2020
Bibliography
Abouharb, M., and Cingranelli, D, 2007, Human Rights and Structural Adjustment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alter, K., 2014, The New Terrain of International Law, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Andonova, L., 2017, Governance Entrepreneurs: International Organizations and the Rise of Public–Private Partnerships, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balaton Chrimes, S. and F. Haines, 2015, “The Depoliticisation of Accountability Processes for Land Based Grievances, and the IFC CAO,” Global Policy 6 (4): 446–454.Google Scholar
Bell, C., 2009, ‘Transitional Justice, Interdisciplinarity and the State of the ‘Field’ or ‘Non-Field’, The International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3: 5–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, F., 2014, Earth System Governance: World Politics in the Anthropocene, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Biermann, F., and Siebenhuner, B, 2009, Managers of Global Change: The Influence of International Environmental Bureaucracies, Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilchitz, D., and Deva, S (eds.), 2013, Human Rights Obligations of Business: Beyond the Corporate Responsibility to Respect? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Block-Lieb, S., and Halliday, T, 2017, Global Lawmakers: International Organizations in the Crafting of World Markets, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butt, N., Lambrick, F, Menton, M, and Renwick, A, 2019, ‘The Supply Chain of Violence’, Nature Sustainability 2: 742–7.Google Scholar
Carl, S., 2018, ‘The History and Evolution of the Ombudsman Model’, in Research Handbook on the Ombudsman, edited by Hertogh, Marc and Kirkham, Richard, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 17–33.Google Scholar
Carmen, J., and Agyeman, J (eds.), 2011, Environmental Inequalities Beyond Borders: Local Perspectives on Global Injustices, Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
CIEL, 2016, ‘NGO Response: Proposed World Bank Safeguards Represent Dangerous Set-Back to Key Environmental and Social Protections, Press Release 22 July.www.ciel.org/news/safeguard-policy-endangers-rights/. Accessed 19 December 2016.Google Scholar
Clapham, A., 2006, Human Rights Obligations of Non-State Actors, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, D., Fox, J., and Treakle, K, 2003, Demanding Accountability: Civil-Society Claims and the World Bank Inspection Panel, Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Compliance Advisor Ombudsman (CAO), 2019, 2018 Annual Report, Washington, DC, World Bank Group. www.cao-ar18.org/grievance-mechanism-article/index.html. Accessed 18 October 2019.Google Scholar
Compliance Advisor/Ombudsman (CAO), 2006, Annual Report: 2005–2006, Washington, DC, IFC and MIGA, CAO.Google Scholar
Conca, K., 2015, An Unfinished Foundation: The United Nations and Global Environmental Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cutler, C., 2003, Private Power and Global Authority: Transnational Merchant Law in the Global Economy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Darrow, M., 2003, Between Light and Shadow: The World Bank, the International Monetary Fund and International Human Rights Law, Oxford and Portland, OR: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Earth System Governance, 2018, Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project, www.earthsystemgovernance.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/11/Earth-System-Governance-Science-Plan-2018.pdf. Accessed 9 August 2019.Google Scholar
European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, 2012, Compliance Review Report: Complaint: Tbilisi Railway Bypass, Request Number 2011/01, 2011/02, 2011/03, London, EBRD. www.ebrd.com/work-with-us/project-finance/project-complaint-mechanism/pcm-register.html. Accessed 5 May 2020.Google Scholar
Foster, C., 2011, Science and the Precautionary Principle in International Courts and Tribunals, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, J., and Brown, D. L. (eds.), 1998, The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and Grassroots Movements, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Fujita, S., 2013, The World Bank, Asian Development Bank and Human Rights, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, T., 2004, ‘What Is Success in Ombuds Processes? Evaluation of a University Ombudsman’, Conflict Resolution Quarterly 21 (3): 313–35.Google Scholar
Hertogh, M., and Kirkham, R, 2018, ‘The Ombudsman and Administrative Justice: From Promise to Performance’, in Research Handbook on the Ombudsman, edited by Hertogh, Marc and Kirkham, Richard, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 1–15.Google Scholar
Hoffman, F., and Megret, F, 2005, ‘Fostering Human Rights Accountability: An Ombudsman for the United Nations’, Global Governance 11: 43–63.Google Scholar
Hofmann, H., 2017, ‘The Developing Role of the European Ombudsman’, in Accountability in the EU: The Role of the European Ombudsman, edited by Hofmann, Herwig and Ziller, Jacques, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 1–27.Google Scholar
Huijstee, M., Genovese, K, Daniel, C, and Singh, S, 2016, Glass Half Full: The State of Accountability in Development Finance. Report by 11 NGOs. www.somo.nl/glass-half-full-2/. Accessed 19 December 2016.Google Scholar
Hunter, D., 2008, ‘Civil Society Networks and the Development of Environmental Standards at International Financial Institutions’, Chicago Journal of International Law 8 (2): 437–77.Google Scholar
Hunter, D., 2003, ‘Using the World Bank Inspection Panel to Defend the Interests of Project-Affected People’, Chicago Journal of International Law 4 (1): Article 14.Google Scholar
Independent Consultation and Investigation Mechanism (ICIM), 2011, Annual Report 2010, IDB. www.iadb.org/en/mici/publications,1768.html. Accessed 9 April 2014.Google Scholar
Independent Consultation and Investigation Mechanism (ICIM), 2011b, CR-MICI001-2011, Closing Report of the Consultation Phase Loans, 2421/BL-NI, 1908/OC-CR and 2016/BL-HO ‘Proposal for an Additional Financing of Cost Overruns for the Central American Electric Interconnection System (SIEPAC) Project and Reallocation of Resources from Loans’. Washington, DC, IDB. www.iadb.org/en/mici/chronological-public-registry%2C19181.html. Accessed 11 May 2020.Google Scholar
Independent Review Mechanism, 2010, Notice of Registration: Request for Compliance Review and/or Problem-solving Request No.: RQ2010/01, Country: Morocco Project: Construction of the Marrakech – Agadir Motorway, African Development Bank. www.afdb.org/en/independent-review-mechanism/management-of-complaints/registered-requests/rq-20101-morocco. Accessed 9 May 2020.Google Scholar
Independent Review Mechanism, 2007, Notice of Registration: Request for Compliance Review, Request No.: RQ 2007/01), Country: Uganda, Bujagali Hydropower Project and Bujagali Interconnection Project, African Development Bank. www.afdb.org/en/independent-review-mechanism/management-of-complaints/registered-requests/rq-20071-uganda. Accessed 9 May 2020.Google Scholar
Inspection Panel, 2009, Accountability at the World Bank: The Inspection Panel at 15 Years, Washington, DC: The Inspection Panel, World Bank.Google Scholar
International Finance Corporation, 2012, IFC Sustainability Framework: Policy and Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability, Access to Information Policy, Washington, DC: World Bank Group. www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-at-ifc/policies-standards/ifcsustainabilityframework_2012. Accessed 18 October 2019.Google Scholar
International Finance Corporation, 2012b, The International Bill of Human Rights and IFC Sustainability Framework, Washington, DC: World Bank Group. www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/topics_ext_content/ifc_external_corporate_site/sustainability-at-ifc/publications/ibhr_ifc_sustainability_framework. Accessed 18 October 2019.Google Scholar
International Ombudsman Institute, 2012, Bylaws, Adopted by the General Assembly in Wellington, New Zealand, 13 November 2012.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J., and McDonnell, K, 2015, ‘Community-Driven Operational Grievance Mechanisms’, Business and Human Rights Journal 1: 127–32.Google Scholar
Kauffman, C., and Sheehan, L, 2019, ‘The Rights of Nature: Guiding Our Responsibilities through Standards’, in Environmental Rights: The Development of Standards, edited by Turner, Stephen, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 342–66.Google Scholar
Keck, M., and Sikkink, K., 1998, Activists Beyond Borders: Advocacy Networks in International Politics, Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keonig-Archibugi, M., and Macdonald, K, 2017, ‘The Role of Beneficiaries in Transnational Regulatory Processes’, American Academy of Political and Social Science Annals 670: 36–67.Google Scholar
Keonig-Archibugi, M., and Macdonald, K, 2013, ‘Accountability-by-Proxy in Transnational Non-State Governance’, Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 26 (3): 499–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, B., Krisch, N., and Stewart, R, 2005 ‘Emergence of Global Administrative Law’, Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (15): 15–62.Google Scholar
Lewis, K., 2012, Citizen Driven Accountability for Sustainable Development, Report Prepared for the Rio+20 Conference by the Independent Accountability Mechanism Network. www.opic.gov/sites/default/files/files/citizen-driven-accountibility.pdf. Accessed June 2018.Google Scholar
Lukas, K., Linder, B, Kutrzeba, A, and Sprenger, C, 2016, Corporate Accountability: The Role and Impact of Non-judicial Grievance, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mares, R., 2019, ‘Securing Human Rights through Risk-Management Methods: Breakthrough or Misalignment?’ Leiden Journal of International Law 32: 517–35.Google Scholar
Mason, M., 2005, The New Accountability: Environmental Responsibility Across Borders, London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Matejova, M., Parker, S, and Dauvergne, P, 2018, ‘The Politics of Repressing Environmentalists as Agents of Foreign Influence’, Australian Journal of International Affairs 72 (2): 145–62.Google Scholar
Mattli, W., and Diez, T, 2014, International Arbitration and Global Governance, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, O., and Nanwani, S, 2019, The Practice of Independent Accountability Mechanisms (IAMs): Towards Good Governance in Development Finance, Leiden, Brill.Google Scholar
Macdonald, K., and Macdonald, T, 2017, ‘Liquid Authority and Political Legitimacy in Transnational Governance’, International Theory 9 (2): 329–51.Google Scholar
Macdonald, K., and M. Miller-Dawkins, 2015, “Accountability in Public International Development Finance,” Global Policy 6: 429–434.Google Scholar
Mitchell, R. 2002–2019. International Environmental Agreements Database Project (Version 2018.1), http://iea.uoregon.edu/. Accessed 16 July 2019.Google Scholar
Moravcsik, A., 2004, ‘Is there a “Democratic Deficit” in World Politics?: A Framework for Analysis’, Government and Opposition 39 (2): 336–63.Google Scholar
Naudé-Fourie, A., 2016, World Bank Accountability – In Theory and in Practice, The Hague: Eleven International Publishing.Google Scholar
Ognibene, L., and Kariuki, A, 2019, ‘Standards in the Procedural Rights of Multilateral Environmental Agreements’, in Environmental Rights: The Development of Standards, edited by Turner, S, Shelton, D, Razzaque, J, McIntyre, O, and May, J, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 174–94.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2018, Multilateral Development Finance: Towards a New Pact on Multilateralism to Achieve the 2030 Agenda Together, Geneva, OECD. www.oecd.org/dac/financing-sustainable-development/development-finance-topics/Multilateral-Development-Finance-Highlights-2018.pdf. Accessed 20 September 2019.Google Scholar
OECD 2017, OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Meaningful Stakeholder Engagement in the Extractive Sector, Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
Pahuja, S., 2011, Decolonising International Law: Development, Economic Growth and the Politics of Universality, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Park, S., unpublished manuscript, The Good Hegemon: US Power, Accountability as Justice, and the Multilateral Development Banks.Google Scholar
Park, S., 2019, Claims Submitted to the Multilateral Development Bank Accountability Mechanisms: 1994–2016. Sydney: The University of Sydney. http://dx.doi.org/10.25910/5bdb90e22bf46Google Scholar
Park, S., 2017, ‘Accountability as Justice for the Multilateral Development Banks? Borrower Opposition and Bank Avoidance to US Power and Influence’, Review of International Political Economy, 24 (5): 776–801.Google Scholar
Park, S., 2013, ‘Transnational Environmental Activism’, in The Handbook of Global Climate and Environment Policy, edited by Falkner, Robert, Chichester UK: John Wiley & Sons: 268–85.Google Scholar
Park, S., 2010, World Bank Group interactions with Environmentalists: Changing International Organisation Identities. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, S., and T. Kramarz, eds. 2019, Global Environmental Governance and the Accountability Trap. Cambridge: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passoni, C., Rosenbaum, A, and Vermunt, E, 2016, Empowering the Inspection Panel: The Impact of the World Bank’s Safeguards Review. Report, New York University School of Law. www.iilj.org/publications/empowering-the-inspection-panel/. Accessed 19 December 2016.Google Scholar
Partzsch, L., 2020, Alternatives to Multilateralism: New Forms of Social and Environmental Governance, Cambridge, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Peel, J., 2011, Science and Risk Regulation in International Law, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Razzaque, J., 2019, ‘A Stock-Taking of FPIC Standards in International Environmental Law’, in Environmental Rights: The Development of Standards, edited by Turner, S, Shelton, D, Razzaque, J, McIntyre, O, and May, J, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, V., 2017, ‘Accountability by Proxy? The Ripple Effects of MDBs’ International Accountability Mechanisms on the Private Sector’, in Conceptualizing Accountability in International Financial Law, edited by Vargiu, P, Seatzu, F, and Esu, F.. halshs-01298135. Accessed 12 August 2019.Google Scholar
Richard, V., no date, ‘More Details on the Project’, IGMs Project. www.igms-project.org/. Accessed 13 August 2019.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, M.G., 2003, Global Environmentalism and Local Politics: Transnational Advocacy Networks in Brazil, Ecuador, and India, New York, SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J., 2013, Just Business: Multinational Corporations and Human Rights, New York: W.W Norton and Company.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J., 2001, ‘Global-governance.net: The Global Compact as Learning Network’, Global Governance 7: 371–8.Google Scholar
Ruggie, J. and T. Nelson, 2015, “Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises: Normative Innovations and Implementation Challenges,” Faculty Research Working Paper Series, Harvard Kennedy School, RWP15-045.Google Scholar
Sagafi-Nejad, T., and Dunning, J, 2008, The UN and Transnational Corporations: From Code of Conduct to Global Compact, Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sarfaty, G., 2009, “Why Culture Matters in International Institutions: The Marginality of Human Rights at the World Bank,” American Journal of International Law, 103: 647–683.Google Scholar
Schmitt, P., 2017, Access to Justice and International Organizations: The Case of Individual Victims of Human Rights Violations, Cheltenham UK, Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Schrijver, N., 2010, Development without Destruction: The UN and Global Resource Management, Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Sovacool, B. 2017, ‘Monitoring the Moneylenders: Institutional Accountability and Environmental Governance at the World Bank’s Inspection Panel’, The Extractives Industry and Society 4: 893–903.Google Scholar
Special Representative of the Secretary-General on the Issue of Human Rights and Transnational Corporations and other Business Enterprises, 2011, Guiding Principle on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework, Geneva, United Nations, U.N. Doc. A/HRC/17/31.Google Scholar
Steffen, W., Richardson, K, Rockström, J et al. 2015. ‘Planetary Boundaries: Guiding Human Development on a Changing Planet’, Science 347 (6223): 1259855.Google Scholar
Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T, Squatrito, T, and Jönsson, C, 2013, The Opening up of International Organizations: Transnational Access in Global Governance, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Temper, L., Demaria, F, Scheidel, A, Del Bene, D, and Martinez-Alier, J, 2018, ‘The Global Environmental Justice Atlas (EJAtlas): Ecological Distribution Conflicts as Forces for Sustainability’, Sustainability Science 13 (3): 573–84.Google Scholar
Thompson, B., 2017, ‘Determining Criteria to Evaluate Outcomes of Businesses’ Provision of Remedy: Applying a Human Rights-Based Approach’, Business and Human Rights Journal, 2: 55–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tienhaara, K., 2009, The Expropriation of Environmental Governance, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, S., Shelton, D, Razzaque, J, McIntyre, O, May, J (eds.), 2019, Environmental Rights: The Development of Standards, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
United Nations, 2018, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Issue of Human Rights Obligations relating to the Enjoyment of a Safe, Clean, Healthy and Sustainable Environment, Human Rights Council 37th Session, A/HRC/37/59. https://undocs.org/A/HRC/37/59. Accessed 14 October 2019.Google Scholar
United Nations, 2015, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights, United Nations General Assembly 70th Session, A/70/274. www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/70/274. Accessed 14 October 2019.Google Scholar
United Nations, 2011, Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights: Implementing the United Nations ‘Protect, Respect and Remedy’ Framework, New York and Geneva, United Nations. www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GuidingPrinciplesBusinessHR_EN.pdf. Accessed 8 July 2016.Google Scholar
United Nations Commission on Human Rights, 2003, ‘Norms on the responsibilities of transnational corporations and other business enterprises with regard to human rights’ Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights, Fifty-fifth session, Agenda item 4, Resolution 16/2003, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/12/Rev.2Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme, 2010, Putting Rio Principle 10 Into Action: An Implementation Guide for the UNEP Bali Guidelines for the Development of National Legislation on Access to Information, Public Participation and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, Geneva, UNEP. www.unenvironment.org/ru/node/10214. Accessed 24 September 2019.Google Scholar
United Nations Global Compact, 2019, ‘The Ten Principles of the UN Global Compact’, United Nations. www.unglobalcompact.org/what-is-gc/mission/principles. Accessed 6 October 2019.Google Scholar
Weissbrodt, D. and Kruger, M, 2003, ‘Norms on the Responsibilities of Transnational Corporations and Other Business Enterprises’, American Journal of International Law 97 (4): 901–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wellens, K., 2002, Remedies against International Organisations, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
World Bank, 2019, Inspection Panel. www.inspectionpanel.org/. Accessed 14 August 2019.Google Scholar
World Bank, 2019b, Annual Report, Washington, DC. World Bank. www.worldbank.org/en/about/annual-report. Accessed 17 September 2019.Google Scholar
World Bank, 2016, ‘The New Environmental and Social Framework’, Safeguards, World Bank website. web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/PROJECTS/EXTPOLICIES/EXTSAFEPOL/0,menuPK:584441~pagePK:64168427~piPK:64168435~theSitePK:584435,00.html. Accessed 16 December 2016.Google Scholar
Wright, C., 2007, ‘From ‘Safeguards’ to ‘Sustainability’: the Evolution of Environmental Discourse inside the International Finance Corporation’, in The World Bank and Governance: A Decade of Reform and Reaction, edited by Stone, Diane and Wright, Christopher, New York: Routledge: 67–87.Google Scholar
Zagelmeyer, S., Bianchi, L, and Shemberg, A, 2018, ‘Non-State Based Non-Judicial Grievance Mechanisms (NSBGM): An Exploratory Analysis’, A report prepared for the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, University of Manchester. www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Business/ARP/ManchesterStudy.pdf. Accessed 14 August 2019.Google Scholar
Zalcberg, J., 2012, ‘The World Bank Inspection Panel: A Tool for Ensuring the World Bank’s Compliance with International Law’, Macquarie Journal of International and Comparative Environmental Law 8 (2): 1–19.Google Scholar
Zappile, T., 2016, ‘Sub-Regional Development Banks: Development as Usual?’ in Global Economic Governance and the Development Practices of the Multilateral Development Banks, edited by Susan Park, Jonathan R. Strand, , Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ziai, A., 2016, “Can the subaltern file claims? The World Bank Inspection Panel and subaltern articulation,” Momentum Quarterly 5 (4): 255–264.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 21
- Cited by