Element contents
Food Taboos in Archaeology
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 March 2026
Summary
Anthropologists have struggled with the concept of the food taboo for over a century; and archaeologists struggle with detecting them in the material signatures of the past. Yet by recognizing that ancient peoples must have followed taboos, some of which may have persisted for thousands of years, we gain insight into how cultural traditions shaped the ways in which people ate and interacted with their environments. This Element concerns food and the cultural structures that surround it. It provides an overview of the history and anthropological understandings of food taboos, and offers critical engagement with the current archaeological method and theory investigating these. Archaeological case studies, including the pig taboo in Judaism and ethnoarchaeological analysis of various mammalian taboos among the Nukak of Amazonia, shed light on the difficulties and prospects of studying food taboos in the material record.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781009663595Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 02 April 2026
References
Adler, Y. and Lernau, O. (2021) “The Pentateuchal Dietary Proscription against Finless and Scaleless Aquatic Species in Light of Ancient Fish Remains,” Tel Aviv. Taylor & Francis, 48(1), pp. 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akimichi, T. (1998) “Pig and Man in Papuan Societies: Two Cases from the Seltaman of the Fringe Highlands and the Gidra of the Lowland,” Senri Ethnological Studies, 47, pp. 163–182.Google Scholar
Allan, K. and Burridge, K. (2006) Forbidden Words: Taboo and the Censoring of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, H. (1978) “Left Out in the Cold: Why Tasmanians Stopped Eating Fish,” The Artefact, 4, pp. 1–10.Google Scholar
Altmann, P., Angelini, A., and Spiciarich, A. (2020) “Introduction,” in Altmann, P., Angelini, A., and Spiciarich, A. (eds) Food Taboos and Biblical Prohibitions: Reassessing Archaeological and Literary Perspectives. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Altmann, P. and Spiciarich, A. (2020) “Chickens, Partridges, and the/tor/of Ancient Israel and the Hebrew Bible,” Die Welt des Orients. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht GmbH & Co. KG Göttingen, 50(1), pp. 2–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barak-Erez, D. (2007) Outlawed Pigs: Law, Religion, and Culture in Israel. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaglehole, J. C. (ed.) (1967) The Journals of Captain James Cook on His Voyages of Discovery: Volume III Part Two. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Beaty, R. E. and Kenett, Y. N. (2023) “Associative Thinking at the Core of Creativity,” Trends in Cognitive Sciences. Elsevier, 27, pp. 671–683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van den Berghe, P. L. (1980) “Incest and Exogamy: A Sociobiological Reconsideration,” Ethology and Sociobiology. Elsevier, 1(2), pp. 151–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boivin, N.
, Crowther, A., Prendergast, M. and Fuller, D. Q. (2014). Indian Ocean food globalisation and Africa. African Archaeological Review, 31, 547–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonomo, M. and Politis, G. (2021) “Humanized Nature: Symbolic Representation of Fauna in Pottery from the Paraná River of South America,” in Bonomo, M. and Archila, S. (eds) South American Contributions to World Archaeology. Cham: Springer Nature, pp. 411–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowdler, S. (1980) “Fish and Culture: A Tasmanian polemic,” The Australian Journal of Anthropology. Sydney University Press for the Anthropological Society of New South Wales., 12: 334–340.Google Scholar
Bray, T. L. (2003) “The Commensal Politics of Early States and Empires,” in Bray, T. L. (ed.) The Archaeology and Politics of Food and Feasting in Early States and Empires. New York: Kluwer Academic, pp. 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burke, E. (2015) “An Appeal from the New to the Old Whigs,” in Marshall, P. J., Bryant, D. C., and Todd, W. B. (eds) The Writings and Speeches of Edmund Burke, Vol. 4: Party, Parliament, and the Dividing of the Whigs: 1780–1794. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 365–477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caplan, P. (2008) “Crossing the Veg/Non-veg Divide: Commensality and Sociality among the Middle Classes in Madras/Chennai,” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies. Taylor & Francis, 31(1), pp. 118–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coogan, M. D. (2017) The Old Testament: A Historical and Literary Introduction to the Hebrew Scriptures, 4th Ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
DeBoer, W. R. (1987) “You Are What You Don’t Eat: Yet Another Look at Food Taboos in Amazonia,” in Auger, R., Glass, M. E, S., and McCartney, P. H. (eds) Ethnicity and Culture. Calgary: The University of Calgary Press, pp. 45–54.Google Scholar
Diamond, J. (1997) Guns, Germs, and Steel: The Fate of Human Societies. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Diener, P. and Robkin, E. E. (1978) “Ecology, Evolution, and the Search for Cultural Origins: The Question of Islamic Pig Prohibition,” Current Anthropology, 19(2), pp. 493–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietler, M. (2001) “Theorizing the Feast: Rituals of Consumption, Commensal Politics, and Power in African Contexts,” in Dietler, M. and Hayden, B. (eds) Feasts: Archaeological and Ethnographic Perspectives on Food, Politics, and Power. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institute Press, pp. 65–114.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1966) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1975) Implicit Meanings: Essays in Anthropology. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (2002) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. New York: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. (1995) The Elementary Forms of the Religious Life. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Faust, A. (2018) “Pigs in Space (and Time) Pork Consumption and Identity Negotiations in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages of Ancient Israel,” Near Eastern Archaeology, 81, pp. 276–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fessler, D. M. T. and Navarrete, C. D. (2003) “Meat Is Good to Taboo: Dietary Proscriptions as a Product of the Interaction of Psychological Mechanisms and Social Processes,” Journal of Cognition and Culture, 3, pp. 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiore, D. and Zangrando, A. F. J. (2006) “Painted Fish, Eaten Fish: Artistic and Archaeofaunal Representations in Tierra del Fuego, Southern South America,” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology. Elsevier, 25(3), pp. 371–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzpatrick, K. K. (2018) “Foraging and Menstruation in the Hadza of Tanzania. Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Department of Archaeology & Anthropology University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
Fowles, S. (2008) “Steps toward an Archaeology of Taboo,” in Fogelin, L. (ed.) Religion, Archaeology, and the Material World. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Occasional Paper No. 36, pp. 15–37.Google Scholar
Frazer, J. G. (1911) The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. Volume 3: Taboo and the Perils of the Soul. London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Frazer, J. G. (1912) The Golden Bough: A Study in Magic and Religion. Volume 8: Spirits of the Corn and of the Wild (Part 2). London: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Freud, S. (2020) Totem and Taboo: Resemblances between the Psychic Lives of Savages and Neurotics. Warsaw: Ktoczyta.pl.Google Scholar
Fu, J. and Altmann, P. (2014) “Feasting: Backgrounds, Theoretical Perspectives, and Introductions,” in Altmann, P. and Fu, J. (eds) Feasting in the Archaeology and Texts of the Bible and the Ancient Near East. Winona Lake (IN): Eisenbrauns, pp. 1–31.Google Scholar
Fulton, D. N. (2020) “Distinguishing Judah and Philistia: A Zooarchaeological View from Ramat Raḥel and Ashkelon,” in Altmann, P., Angelini, A., and Spiciarich, A. (eds) Food Taboos and Biblical Prohibitions: Reassessing Archaeological and Literary Perspectives. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 87–106.Google Scholar
Gell, A. (1979) “Reflections on a Cut Finger: Taboo in the Umeda Conception of the Self,” in Hook, R. H. (ed.) Fantasy and Symbol: Studies in Anthropological Interpretation. New York: Academic Press, pp. 133–148.Google Scholar
Greer, J. (2020) “Prohibited Pigs and Prescribed Priestly Portions: Zooarchaeological Remains from Tel Dan and Questions Concerning Ethnicity and Priestly Traditions in the Hebrew Bible,” in Altmann, P., Angelini, A., and Spiciarich, A. (eds) Food Taboos and Biblical Prohibitions: Reassessing Archaeological and Literary Perspectives. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, pp. 73–85.Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1985a) Good to Eat: Riddles of Food and Culture. Long Grove (IL): Waveland Press.Google Scholar
Harris, M. (1985b) The Sacred Cow and the Abominable Pig: Riddles of Food and Culture. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Hastorf, C. A. (2016) The Social Archaeology of Food: Thinking about Eating from Prehistory to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkes, C. (1954) “Wenner-Gren Foundation Supper Conference: Archeological Theory and Method: Some Suggestions from the Old World,” American Anthropologist, New Series, 56(2), pp. 155–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J. (2004) “Demography and Cultural Evolution: How Adaptive Cultural Processes Can Produce Maladaptive Losses: The Tasmanian Case,” American Antiquity, 69, pp. 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henrich, J. and Henrich, N. (2010) “The Evolution of Cultural Adaptations: Fijian Food Taboos Protect against Dangerous Marine Toxins,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 277, pp. 3715–3724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Héritier, F. (1979) “Symbolique de l’inceste et de sa prohibition,” in Izard, M. and Smith, P. (eds) La fonction symbolique. Paris: Gallimard, pp. 209–243.Google Scholar
Hesse, B. and Wapnish, P. (1998) “Pig Use and Abuse in the Ancient Levant: Ethnoreligious Boundary-Building and Swine,” in Nelson, S. (ed.) Ancestors for the Pigs. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology, MASCA Research Papers in Science and Archaeology 15, pp. 123–135.Google Scholar
Hesse, B. and Wapnish, P. (2000) “Can Pig Remains Be Used for Ethnic Diagnosis in the Ancient Near East?” in Silberman, N. A. and Small, D. B. (eds) The Archaeology of Israel: Constructing the Past, Interpreting the Present. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press (Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement Series 237), pp. 238–270.Google Scholar
Horton, D. R. (1979) “Tasmanian Adaptation,” Mankind. Oxford: Blackwell, 12(1), pp. 28–34.Google Scholar
Horton, M. (1996) “Architecture: Materials, Functions and Evolution,” in Horton, M. (ed.) Shanga: The Archaeology of a Muslim Trading Community on the Coast of East Africa. Nairobi: British Institute in Eastern Africa, pp. 224–242.Google Scholar
Horwitz, L. K., Gardeisen, A. M., Hitchcock, A. M., Louise, A. (2017) “A Contribution to the Iron Age Philistine Pig Debate,” in Lev-Tov, J., Hesse, P., and Gilbert, A. (eds) The Wide Lens in Archaeology: Honoring Brian Hesse’s Contributions to Anthropological Archaeology. Atlanta (GA): Lockwood Press, pp. 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ijzereef, F. G. (1989) “Social Differentiation from Animal Bone Studies,” in Serjeantson, D. and Waldron, T. (eds) Diet and Crafts in Towns. Oxford: BAR, pp. 41–53.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (1978) “Why Did the Tasmanians Stop Eating Fish,” in Gould, R. (ed.) Explorations in Ethnoarchaeology. Santa Fe: University of New Mexico Press, Cambridge, pp. 11–47.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (1984) “Hunters and History: A Case Study from Western Tasmania,” in Schrire, C., Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I., and Wiessner, P. W. (eds) Past and Present in Hunter Gatherer Studies. New York: Academic Press, pp. 27–65.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (1995) “Tasmanian archaeology: Establishing the Sequences,” Annual Review of Anthropology. Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way, PO Box 10139, Palo Alto, CA 94303–0139, USA, 24(1), pp. 423–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khara, T., Riedy, C., and Ruby, M. B. (2020) “‘We Have to Keep It a Secret’ – The Dynamics of Front and Backstage Behaviours Surrounding Meat Consumption in India,” Appetite, 149, p. 104615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2020.104615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
King, J. (1785) A Voyage to the Pacific Ocean, Vol. III. London: H. Hughes. https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/bcbooks/items/1.0342315.Google Scholar
Krämer, H. M. (2008) “‘Not Befitting Our Divine Country’: Eating Meat in Japanese Discourses of Self and Other from the Seventeenth Century to the Present,” Food and Foodways. Taylor & Francis, 16(1), pp. 33–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kusimba, C. M. (2023) Swahili Worlds in Globalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawrence, F. (2013) “Horsemeat Scandal: The Essential Guide,” The Guardian, 15 February 2013.Google Scholar
Lepowsky, M. A. (1985) “Food Taboos, Malaria and Dietary Change: Infant Feeding and Cultural Adaptation on a Papua New Guinea Island,” Ecology of Food and Nutrition. Routledge, 16(2), pp. 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1080/03670244.1985.9990853.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lev-Tov, J. (2012) “A Preliminary Report on the Late Bronze and Iron Age Faunal Assemblages from Tell es- Safi/Gath,” in Maeir, A. (ed.) Tell es-Safi/Gath I: Report on the 1996–2005 Seasons. Harrassowitz. Ägypten und Altes Testament 69: Wiesbaden, pp. 589–612.Google Scholar
Lev-Tov, J. S. (2000) Pigs, Philistines, and the Ancient Animal Economy of Ekron from the Late Bronze Age to the Iron Age II. University of Tennessee, Knoxville.Google Scholar
Lev, M. and Barkai, R. (2016) “Elephants Are People, People Are Elephants: Human–Proboscideans Similarities as a Case for Cross Cultural Animal Humanization in Recent and Paleolithic Times,” Quaternary International, 406, pp. 239–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2015.07.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lévi-Strauss, C. (1969) The Elementary Structures of Kinship. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Lisowski, M. (2019) The Identification of Jewish Patterns of Food Preparation and Consumption: A Zooarchaeological Approach to the Medieval and Early Modern Evidence from Central Europe. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Sheffield.Google Scholar
Lyman, R. L. (1985) “Bone Frequencies: Differential Transport, in Situ Destruction, and the MGUI,” Journal of Archaeological Science. Elsevier, 12(3), pp. 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lyman, R. L. (2003) “The Influence of Time Averaging and Space Averaging on the Application of Foraging Theory in Zooarchaeology,” Journal of Archaeological Science, 30, pp. 595–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Makarewicz, C. (2016) “Toward an Integrated Isotope Zooarchaeology,” in Gruope, G. and McGlynn, G. C. (eds) Isotopic Landscapes in Bioarchaeology. Berlin: Springer, pp. 189–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mead, M. (1937) Tabu, Encyclopaedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 7. London: The Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mead, M. (1978) “A Proposal: We Need Taboos on Sex at Work,” Redbook, 150, pp. 31, 33, 38.Google Scholar
Meadow, R. H. (1980) “Animal Bones: Problems for the Archaeologist together with Some Possible Solutions,” Paléorient, 6, pp. 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mednick, S. (1962) “The Associative Basis of the Creative Process,” Psychological Review. American Psychological Association, 69(3), p. 220–232.Google ScholarPubMed
Meigs, A. S. (1984) Food, Sex, and Pollution. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Melville, H. (1893) Typee: A Narrative of a Four Months’ Residence among the Native of a Valley of the Marqeusas Islands. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Meyer-Rochow, V. B. (2009) “Food Taboos: Their Origins and Purposes,” Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 5, p. 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, M. J. et al. (2021) “Quinoa, Potatoes, and Ilamas Fueled Emergent Social Complexity in the Lake Titicaca Basin of the Andes,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. National Academy of Sciences, 118(49), p. e2113395118.Google Scholar
Milner, N., Craig, O. E., Bailey, G. N., Kristian, P., Søren, H. (2004) “Something Fishy in the Neolithic? A Re-evaluation of Stable Isotope Analysis of Mesolithic and Neolithic Coastal Populations,” Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, 78(299), pp. 9–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milner, N., Craig, O. E., Bailey, G. N., Kristian, P., Søren, H. (2006) “A Response to Richards and Schulting,” Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, 80(308), pp. 456–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nemeroff, C. and Rozin, P. (1992) “Sympathetic Magical Beliefs and Kosher Dietary Practice: The Interaction of Rules and Feelings,” Ethos. JSTOR, 20(1), pp. 96–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Papineau, D. and Heyes, C. (2006) “Rational or Associative? Imitation in Japanese quail,” in Rational Animals. Hurley, S. & Nudds, M. (Eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 187–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavao-Zuckerman, B., Mayfield, Copperstone, Tracie, Chance Foster, H. Thomas (2018) ‘“Horned Cattle and Pack Horses”: Zooarchaeological Legacy Collections from the Unauthorized (and Unscreened) Spanish Fort,” Southeastern Archaeology. Routledge, 37(3), pp. 190–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/0734578X.2018.1459133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peres, T. M. (2017) “Foodways Archaeology: A Decade of Research from the Southeastern United States,” Journal of Archaeological Research. Springer, 25, pp. 421–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry-Gal, L., Ktalav, Nadav-Ziv, Inbar, Liat, Haddad, Elie (2022) “Pigs in a Pit: An Unusual Find of Ritual Suid Exploitation in an Early Islamic Context at the Site of Tel Yavne, Israel,” Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports, 43, p. 103462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2022.103462.Google Scholar
Perry‐Gal, L., Lieberman, T., and Uziel, J. (2024) “Ingestible Identity: Pigs in Pagan Ritual in Aelia Capitolina (Roman Jerusalem) between the Second Temple Period and Early Christianity,” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 16, p. 35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, J. and Schmidt, K. (2004) “Animals in the Symbolic World of PrePottery Neolithic Göbekli Tepe, Southeastern Turkey: A Preliminary Assessment,” Anthropozoologica, 39, pp. 179–218.Google Scholar
Politis, G. G. (2007) Nukak: Ethnoarchaeology of an Amazonian People. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
Politis, G. G. (2016) “Bonescapes: Engaging People and Land with Animal Bones among South American Tropical Foragers,” in Lovis, W. A. (ed.) Marking the Land: Hunter-Gatherer Creation of Meaning in their Environment. London: Routledge, pp. 152–179.Google Scholar
Politis, G. G. and Saunders, N. J. (2002) “Archaeological Correlates of Ideological Activity: Food Taboos and Spirit-Animals in an Amazonian Hunter-Gatherer Society,” in Miracle, C. P. T. and Milner, N. (eds) Consuming Passions and Patterns of Consumption. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, pp. 113–130.Google Scholar
Poole, K. (2013) “Horses for Courses? Religious Change and Dietary Shifts in Anglo‐Saxon England,” Oxford Journal of Archaeology. Wiley Online Library, 32(3), pp. 319–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Power, C. (2015) “Hadza Gender Rituals – Epeme and Maitoko – Considered as Counterparts,” Hunter Gatherer Research, 1, pp. 333–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M. D. (2021) Evolution of a Taboo: Pigs and People in the Ancient Near East. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, M. D. (2022) “Food and Israelite Identity,” in Fu, J., Shafer-Elliott, C., and Meyers, C. (eds) T&T Clark Handbook of Food in the Hebrew Bible and Ancient Israel. London: T&T Clark, pp. 423–463.Google Scholar
Price, M. D. and Hongo, H. (2020) “The Archaeology of Pig Domestication: Methods, Models, and Case Studies,” Journal of Archaeological Research, 28, pp. 557–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rautman, A. E. and Fenton, T. W. (2005) “A Case of Historic Cannibalism in the American West: Implications for Southwestern Archaeology,” American Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, 70(2), pp. 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichel-Dolmatoff, G. (1978) “Desana Animal Categories, Food Restrictions, and the Concept of Color Energies,” Journal of Latin American Lore, 4, pp. 243–291.Google Scholar
Rhodes, R. (1997) Deadly Feasts: Tracking the Secrets of a Terrifying New Plague. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Rhyder, J. (2021) Centralizing the Cult: The Holiness Legislation in Leviticus 17–26. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Rhyder, J. (2023) “The Jewish Pig Prohibition from Leviticus to the Maccabees,” Journal of Biblical Literature. Duke University Press, 142(2), pp. 221–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, M. P. and Hedges, R. E. M. (1999) “A Neolithic Revolution? New Evidence of Diet in the British Neolithic,” Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, 73(282), pp. 891–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, M. P. and Schulting, R. J. (2006) “Touch Not the Fish: The Mesolithic-Neolithic Change of Diet and Its Significance,” Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, 80(308), pp. 444–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblum, J.D. (2024). Forbidden: A 3,000-Year History of Jews and the Pig. New York: NYU Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenblum, J. D. (2010) “‘Why Do You Refuse to Eat Pork?”: Jews, Food, and Identity in Roman Palestine,” The Jewish Quarterly Review, 100, pp. 95–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosengren, K. S. and French, J. A. (2013) “Magical Thinking,” in Taylor, M. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of the Development of Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 42–60.Google Scholar
Ross, E. (1978) “Food Taboos, Diet, and Hunting Strategy: The Adaptation to Animals in Amazon Cultural Ecology,” Current Anthropology, 19, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P., Haidt, Jonathan, McCauley, C., Imada, Sumio (1997) “Disgust: The Cultural Evolution of a Food-based Emotion,” in Macbeth, H. (ed.) Food Preference and Taste: Continuity and Change. New York: Berghahn Books, pp. 65–82.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Haidt, J., and McCauley, C. R. (2008) “Disgust,” in Lewis, M., Haviland-Jones, J. M., and Barrett, L. F. (eds) Handbook of Emotions. New York: The Guilford Press, pp. 757–776.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Markwith, M., and Nemeroff, C. (1992) “Magical Contagion Beliefs and Fear of AIDS,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology. Wiley Online Library, 22(14), pp. 1081–1092.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozin, P., Markwith, M., and Ross, B. (1990) “The Sympathetic Magical Law of Similarity, Nominal Realism and Neglect of Negatives in Response to Negative Labels,” Psychological Science. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE, 1(6), pp. 383–384.Google Scholar
Rozin, P., Markwith, M., and Stoess, C. (1997) “Moralization and Becoming a Vegetarian: The Transformation of Preferences into Values and the Recruitment of Disgust,” Psychological Science, 8, pp. 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, N. (2012) Social Zooarchaeology: Humans and Animals in Prehistory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, N. (2018) “Neolithic Taboos in Anatolia and Southeast Europe,” in Ivanova, M., Athanassov, Bogdan, Petrova, Vany, Takorova, Desislava, Stockhammer, Philipp W. (eds) Social Dimensions of Food in the Prehistoric Balkans. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 14–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakurai, J. (2017) “Archaeology of Early-Modern Japan: Food, Rituals, and Taboos,” in Habu, J., Lape, P. V., and Olsen, J. W. (eds) Handbook of East and Southeast Asian Archaeology. New York: Springer, pp. 677–694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saladié, P. and Rodríguez-Hidalgo, A. (2017) “Archaeological Evidence for Cannibalism in Prehistoric Western Europe: From Homo Antecessor to the Bronze Age,” Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 24(4), pp. 1034–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-016-9306-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanday, P. R. (1986) Divine Hunger: Cannibalism as a Cultural System. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sapir-Hen, L., Bar-Oz, Guy, Gadot, Yuval, Finkelstein, Israel (2013) “Pig Husbandry in Iron Age Israel and Judah,” in Kamlah, J., Lichtenberger, A., and Witte, M. (eds) Zeitschrift des Deutschen Palästine-Vereins. Weisbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag, pp. 1–22.Google Scholar
Sapir-Hen, L. (2018) “Food, Pork Consumption, and Identity in Ancient Israel,” Near Eastern Archaeology, 81, pp. 52–59.Google Scholar
Schoeninger, M. J. (2014) “Stable Isotope Analyses and the Evolution of Human Diets,” Annual Review of Anthropology. Annual Reviews, 43(1), pp. 413–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwitzgebel, E. and Ellis, J. (2017) “Rationalization in Moral and Philosophical Thought,” in Bonnefon, J.-F. and Trémolière, B. (eds) Moral Inferences. London: Routledge, pp. 170–190.Google Scholar
Scott, E. M. (1996) “Who Ate What? Archaeological Food Remains and Cultural Diversity,” in Reitz, E. J., Newsom, L. A., and Scudder, S. J. (eds) Case Studies in Environmental Archaeology: Interdisciplinary Contributions to Archaeology. New York: Plenum Press, pp. 357–374.Google Scholar
Serjeantson, D. (2000) “Good to Eat and Good to Think with: Classifying Animals from Complex Sites,” in Rowley-Conwy, P. A. (ed.) Animal Bones, Human Societies. Oxford: Oxbow Books, pp. 179–189.Google Scholar
Shimizu, A. (2010) “Meat-eating in the Kōjimachi District of Edo,” in Rath, E. C. and Assmann, S. (eds) Japanese Foodways, Past and Present. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, pp. 92–107.Google Scholar
Simoons, F. J. (1961) Eat Not This Flesh: Food Avoidances in the Old World. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Simoons, F. J. (1994) Eat Not This Flesh: Food Avoidances in the Old World, 2nd Ed. Madison University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Singh, M. and Henrich, J. (2020) “Why Do Religious Leaders Observe Costly Prohibitions? Examining Taboos on Mentawai Shamans,” Evolutionary Human Sciences. Cambridge University Press, 2, p. e32.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, C. (1999) “Dogs, Cats and Horses in the Scottish Medieval Town,” in Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland, pp. 859–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sperber, D. (1997) “Intuitive and Reflective Beliefs,” Mind & Language, 12, pp. 67–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speth, J. D. (2009) The Paleoanthropology and Archaeology of Big-Game Hunting: Protein, Fat, or Politics? New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Testart, A. (1991) Des Mythes et des Croyances: Esquisse d/une Théorie Générale. Paris: Maison des Sciences de l’Homme.Google Scholar
Thomas, J. (2003) “Thoughts on the ‘Repacked’ Neolithic Revolution,” Antiquity, 77, pp. 67–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, V. (1964) “Betwixt and between: The Liminal Period in Rites de Passage,” The Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society, 1964, pp. 4–20.Google Scholar
Turner, V. (1967) The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca (NY): Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Twiss, K. C. (2006) “A Modified Boar Skull from Çatalhöyük,” Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research, 342, pp. 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twiss, K. C. (2008) “Transformations in an Early Agricultural Society: Feasting in the Southern Levantine Pre-Pottery Neolithic,” Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 27, pp. 418–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Twiss, K. C. (2019) The Archaeology of Food: Identity, Politics, and Ideology in the Prehistoric and Historic Past. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valenzuela-Lamas, S., Valenzuela-Suau, L., Saula, O., Colet, A., Mercadal, O., Subiranas, C. and Nadal, J. (2014) “Shechita and Kashrut: Identifying Jewish Populations through Zooarchaeology and Taphonomy: Two Examples from Medieval Catalonia (North-Eastern Spain),” Quaternary International. Elsevier, 330, pp. 109–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valeri, V. (2000) The Forest of Taboos: Morality, Hunting, and Identity among the Huaulu of the Moluccas. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
Vermeersch, S. et al. (2021) “Animal Husbandry from the Middle Bronze Age through the Iron Age in the Shephelah – Faunal Remains from the New Excavations at Lachish,” Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, 13(3), p. 38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12520-021-01289-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Villa, P. (1992) ”Cannibalism in Prehistoric Europe,” Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews. Wiley Online Library, 1(3), pp. 93–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, B. L. (2001) “Commercial Growth and Environmental Change in Early Modern Japan: Hachinohe’s Wild Boar Famine of 1749,” Journal of Asian Studies, 60(2), pp. 329–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warter, J. W. (ed.) (1856) Selections from the Letter of Robert Southey, Vol. III. London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans, and Roberts.Google Scholar
Webb, M. C. (1965) “The Abolition of the Taboo System in Hawaii,” The Journal of the Polynesian Society. JSTOR, 74(1), pp. 21–39.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (2019) Economy and Society: A New Translation. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weil, K. (2007) “They Eat Horses, Don’t They? Hippophagy and Frenchness,” Gastronomica. University of California Press, 7(2), pp. 44–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, T. E. (1952) ‘Observations on the Butchering Technique of Some Aboriginal Peoples: I,” American Antiquity. Cambridge University Press, 17(4), pp. 337–338.Google Scholar
Whitfield, J. T., Pako, W. H., Collinge, J., Alpers, M.P. (2008) “Mortuary Rites of the South Fore and Kuru,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, pp. 3721–3724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Willey, G. R. and Phillips, P. (1958) Method and Theory in Archaeology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, B. and Edwards, P. (1993) “Butchery of Horse and Dog at Witney Palace, Oxfordshire, and the knackering and Feeding of Meat to Hounds during the Post-medieval Period,” Post-Medieval Archaeology. Taylor & Francis, 27(1), pp. 43–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winchcombe, R. (2023) “The Limits of Disgust: Eating the Inedible during Jamestown’s Starving Time,” Global Food History. Taylor & Francis, pp. 1–23.Google Scholar
Woodburn, J. (1964) ‘The Social Organization of the Hadza of North Tanganyika. Unpublished PhD thesis, Cambridge University. Unpublished PhD thesis, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Zvelebil, M. (2000) “Fat Is a Feminist Issue: On Ideology, Diet and Health in Hunter-Gatherer Societies,” in Donald, M. and Hurcombe, L. (eds) Gender and Material Culture in Archaeological Perspective. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accessibility standard: WCAG 2.1 AA
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
The HTML of this element
complies with version 2.1 of the
Web Content Accessibility Guidelines
(WCAG), covering newer accessibility requirements and improved
user experiences and achieves the intermediate
(AA)
level of WCAG compliance, covering a wider range of accessibility requirements.
Content Navigation
Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.
Reading Order & Textual Equivalents
Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.
Full alternative textual descriptions
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
You get more than just short alt text: you have comprehensive text equivalents, transcripts, captions, or audio descriptions for substantial non‐text content, which is especially helpful for complex visuals or multimedia.
Visual Accessibility
Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.
Structural and Technical Features
ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.