Element contents
Series: Elements in Criminology
A Framework for Addressing Violence and Serious Crime
Focused Deterrence, Legitimacy, and Prevention
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 27 February 2021
Summary
This Element examines an increasingly important community crime prevention strategy - focused deterrence. This strategy seeks to change offender behavior by understanding underlying crime-producing dynamics and conditions that sustain recurring crime problems, and implementing a blended set of law enforcement, community mobilization, and social service actions. The approach builds on recent theorizing on optimizing deterrence, mobilizing informal social control, enhancing police legitimacy, and reducing crime opportunities through situational crime prevention. There are three main types of focused deterrence strategies: group violence intervention programs, drug market intervention programs, and individual offender programs. A growing number of rigorous program evaluations find focused deterrence to be an effective crime prevention strategy. However, a number of steps need to be taken to ensure focused deterrence strategies are implemented properly. These steps include creating a network of capacity through partnering agencies, conducting upfront and ongoing problem analysis, and developing accountability structures and sustainability plans.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Series: Elements in CriminologyOnline ISBN: 9781108938143Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 25 March 2021
References
Abt, T. (2019). Bleeding Out: The Devastating Consequences of Urban Violence and a Bold New Plan for Peace in the Streets, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Abt, T. & Winship, C. (2016). What Works in Reducing Community Violence, Washington, DC: United States Agency for International Development.Google Scholar
Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the Street: Decency, Violence and the Moral Life of the Inner City, New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Bachman, R., Paternoster, R., & Ward, S. (1992). The rationality of sexual offending: Testing a deterrence/rational choice conception of sexual assault. Law & Society Review, 26 (2), 343–372.Google Scholar
Bardach, E. (1998). Getting Agencies to Work Together, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Beetham, D. (1991). The Legitimation of Power, Atlantic Highlands, NJ: Humanities Press International.Google Scholar
Bell, M. (2016). Situational trust: How disadvantaged mothers reconceive legal cynicism. Law & Society Review, 50(2),314–347.Google Scholar
Bell, M. (2017). Police reform and the dismantling of legal estrangement. Yale Law Journal, 126 (7), 2054–2150.Google Scholar
Bennett, W., DiIulio, J., & Walters, J. (1996) Body Count: Moral Poverty – And How to Win America’s War Against Crime and Drugs, New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. (1789/1988). The Principles of Morals and Legislation, Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Block, C.R. & Block, R. (1993). Street Gang Crime in Chicago. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Borges, D., Emiliano Rojido, E., & Cano, I. (2019). Avaliação de impacto do pacto Pelotas pela paz. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Laboratório de Análise da Violência, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond procedural justice: A dialogic approach to legitimacy in criminal justice. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102 (1), 119–170.Google Scholar
Bradbury, S. (2017) City revives effort to quell gun violence by aggressively targeting gang members. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Aug. 7. www.post-gazette.com/local/city/2017/08/07/Pittsburgh-Police-gun-violence-gangs-group-intervention-David-Kennedy-PIRC/stories/201708070007Google Scholar
Boyle, D., Lanterman, J., Pascarella, J., & Cheng, C. (2010). The impact of Newark’s Operation Ceasefire on trauma center gunshot wound admissions. Justice Research and Policy, 12 (2), 105–123.Google Scholar
Braga, A. (2003). Serious youth gun offenders and the epidemic of youth violence in Boston. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19 (1), 33–54.Google Scholar
Braga, A. (2004). Gun Violence Among Serious Young Offenders, num 23 of problem-oriented guides for police series, Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Braga, A. (2008a). Problem-Oriented Policing and Crime Prevention, 2nd edn, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Braga, A. (2008b). Pulling levers focused deterrence strategies and the prevention of gun homicide. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36 (4), 332–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A. (2012). Getting deterrence right? Evaluation evidence and complementary crime control mechanisms. Criminology & Public Policy, 11 (2), 201–210.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Apel, R., & Welsh, B. (2013). The spillover effects of focused deterrence on gang violence. Evaluation Review, 37 (3–4), 314–342.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Brunson, R., & Drakulich, K. (2019). Race, place, and effective policing. Annual Review of Sociology, 45, 535–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A., Hureau, D., & Grossman, L. (2014). Managing the Group Violence Intervention: Using Shooting Scorecards to Track Group Violence, Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Hureau, D., & Papachristos, A. (2014). Deterring gang-involved gun violence: Measuring the impact of Boston’s Operation Ceasefire on street gang behavior. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 30 (1), 113–139.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Hureau, D., & Winship, C. (2008). Losing faith? Police, black churches, and the resurgence of youth violence in Boston. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, 6 (1), 141–172.Google Scholar
Braga, A. & Kennedy, D. (2012). Linking situational crime prevention and focused deterrence strategies. In Tilley, N. and Farrell, G., eds., The Reasoning Criminologist: Essays in Honour of Ronald V. Clarke. London, UK: Taylor and Francis, pp. 51–65.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Kennedy, D., & Tita, G. (2002). New approaches to the strategic prevention of gang and group-involved violence. In Huff, C. R., ed., Gangs in America, 3rd edn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, pp. 271–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A., Kennedy, D., Waring, E., & Piehl, A. (2001). Problem-oriented policing, deterrence, and youth violence: An evaluation of Boston’s Operation Ceasefire. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 38 (1), 195–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A., McDevitt, J., & Pierce, G. (2006). Understanding and preventing gang violence: Problem analysis and response development in Lowell, Massachusetts. Police Quarterly, 9 (1), 20–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A., Pierce, G., McDevitt, J., Bond, B., & Cronin, S. (2008). The strategic prevention of gun violence among gang-involved offenders. Justice Quarterly, 25 (1), 132–162.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Turchan, B., & Barao, L. (2019). The influence of investigative resources on homicide clearances. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 35 (2), 337–364.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Turchan, B., Hureau, D., & Papachristos, A. (2019). Hot spots policing and crime reduction: An update of an ongoing systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15 (3), 289–311.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Turchan, B., & Winship, C. (2019). Partnership, accountability, and innovation: Clarifying Boston’s experience with pulling levers. In Weisburd, D. and Braga, A., eds., Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A., & Weisburd, D. (2012). The effects of focused deterrence strategies on crime: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 49 (3), 323–358.Google Scholar
Braga, A., & Weisburd, D. (2012). Must we settle for less rigorous evaluations in large area-based crime prevention programs? Lessons from a Campbell review of focused deterrence. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 10 (4), 573–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braga, A., & Weisburd, D. (2019). Problem-oriented policing: The disconnect between principles and practice. In Weisburd, D. and Braga, A., eds., Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–204.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Weisburd, D., & Turchan, B. (2018). Focused deterrence strategies and crime control: An updated systematic review and meta-analysis of the empirical evidence. Criminology & Public Policy, 17 (1), 205–250.Google Scholar
Braga, A., Zimmerman, G., Barao, L., Farrell, C., Brunson, R., & Papachristos, A. (2019). Street gangs, gun violence, and focused deterrence: Comparing place-based and group-based evaluation methods to estimate direct and spillover deterrent effects. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 56 (4), 524–562.Google Scholar
Bratton, W., & Anderson, P. (2018). Precision policing. City Journal, www.city-journal.org/html/william-bratton-precision-policing-16084.htmlGoogle Scholar
Brunson, R. (2007). ‘Police don’t like black people’: African American young men’s accumulated police experiences. Criminology & Public Policy, 6 (1), 71–102.Google Scholar
Brunson, R. (2015). Focused deterrence and improved police-community relations: Unpacking the proverbial ‘black box’. Criminology & Public Policy, 14 (3), 507–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunson, R., Braga, A., Hureau, D., & Pegram, K. (2015). We trust you, but not that much: Examining police–black clergy partnerships to reduce youth violence. Justice Quarterly, 32 (6), 1006–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bursik, R. & Grasmick, H. (1993). Neighborhoods and Crime: The Dimensions of Effective Community Control, Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Butterfield, F. (2000). Cities reduce crime and conflict without New York-style hardball. New York Times, www.nytimes.com/2000/03/04/nyregion/cities-reduce-crime-and-conflict-without-new-york-style-hardball.htmlGoogle Scholar
Chaiken, J., & Chaiken, M. (1982). Varieties of Criminal Behavior, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Circo, G., Krupa, J., McGarrell, E., & DeBiasi, A. (2019). The individual-level deterrent effect of “call-in” meetings on time to re-arrest. Crime & Delinquency, https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128719885869Google Scholar
Clark-Moorman, K., Rydberg, J., & McGarrell, E. (2019). Impact evaluation of a parolee-based focused deterrence program on community-level violence. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 30 (9), 1408–1430.Google Scholar
Clarke, R., ed. (1997). Situational Crime Prevention: Successful Case Studies, 2nd edn. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.Google Scholar
Clarke, R., & Weisburd, D. (1994). Diffusion of crime control benefits: Observations on the reverse of displacement. Crime Prevention Studies, 2, 165–184.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cohen, L., & Felson, M. (1979). Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review, 44 (4), 588–605.Google Scholar
Collins, J., Spencer, D., Snodgrass, J., &Wheeless, S. (1999). Linkage of Domestic Violence and Substance Abuse Services. Rockville, MD: National Criminal Justice Reference Service.Google Scholar
Cook, P. (1980). Research in criminal deterrence: Laying the groundwork for the second decade. In Morris, N. and Tonry, M., eds., Crime and Justice: An Annual Review of Research, vol 2. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 211–268.Google Scholar
Cook, P. (2009). Robbery. In Tonry, M., ed., The Oxford Handbook of Crime and Public Policy. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 102–114.Google Scholar
Cook, P., & Ludwig, J. (2006). Aiming for evidence-based gun policy. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(3), 691–735.Google Scholar
Cook, P., Ludwig, J., & Braga, A. (2005). Criminal records of homicide offenders. Journal of the American Medical Association, 294 (5), 598–601.Google Scholar
Cook, P., Ludwig, J., Venkatesh, S., & Braga, A. (2007). Underground gun markets. The Economic Journal, 117 (11), 558–588.Google Scholar
Cornish, D., & Clarke, R., eds. (1986). The Reasoning Criminal: Rational Choice Perspectives on Offending, New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Cornish, D., & Clarke, R. (2003). Opportunities, precipitators and criminal decisions: A reply to Wortley’s critique of situational crime prevention. In Smith, M. and Cornish, D., eds., Theory for Practice in Situational Crime Prevention, vol. 16. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 41–96.Google Scholar
Corsaro, N., & Brunson, R. (2013). Are suppression and deterrence mechanisms Enough? Examining the “pulling levers” drug market intervention strategy in Peoria, Illinois, USA. International Journal of Drug Policy, 24 (2), 115–121.Google Scholar
Corsaro, N., Brunson, R., & McGarrell, E. (2009). Problem-oriented policing and open-air drug markets: Examining the Rockford pulling levers strategy. Crime & Delinquency, 59 (7), 1085–1107.Google Scholar
Corsaro, N., Brunson, R., & McGarrell, E. (2010). Evaluating a policing strategy intended to disrupt an illicit street-level drug market. Evaluation Review, 34 (6), 513–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Corsaro, N., & Engel, R. (2015). Most challenging of contexts: Assessing the impact of focused deterrence on serious violence in New Orleans. Criminology & Public Policy, 14 (3), 471–505.Google Scholar
Corsaro, N., Hunt, E., Hipple, N., & McGarrell, E. (2012). The impact of drug market pulling levers policing on neighborhood violence: An evaluation of the High Point drug market intervention. Criminology & Public Policy, 11 (2), 167–199.Google Scholar
Corsaro, N., & McGarrell, E. (2009a). An Evaluation of the Nashville Drug Market Initiative (DMI) Pulling Levers Strategy, East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University, School of Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
Corsaro, N., & McGarrell, E. (2009b) Testing a promising homicide reduction strategy: Re-assessing the impact of the Indianapolis “pulling levers” intervention. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 5 (1), 63–82.Google Scholar
Cranley, J., Duhaney, P. & Isaac, E. (2020). City’s commitment to collaborative agreement stronger than ever. The Enquirer, Feb. 21. www.cincinnati.com/story/opinion/2020/02/21/opinion-citys-commitment-collaborative-agreement-stronger-than-ever/4806546002/Google Scholar
Curry, G., Ball, R., & Fox, R. (1994). Gang Crime and Law Enforcement Record Keeping, Washington, DC: US National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Dalton, E. (2002). Targeted crime reduction efforts in ten communities: Lessons for the project safe neighborhoods initiative. US Attorney’s Bulletin, 50 (1), 16–25.Google Scholar
Decker, S. (1996). Gangs and violence: The expressive character of collective involvement. Justice Quarterly, 11 (2), 231–250.Google Scholar
Delaney, C. (2006). The Effects of Focused Deterrence on Gang Homicide: An Evaluation of Rochester’s Ceasefire Program, Rochester, NY: Rochester Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Densley, J., & Squier Jones, D. (2016). Pulling levers on gang violence in London and St. Paul. In Maxson, C. & Esbesnsen, F., eds., Gang Transitions and Transformations in an International Context. New York: Springer, pp. 291–305.Google Scholar
Deuchar, R. (2013). Policing Youth Violence: Transatlantic Connections, London, UK: IEP Press.Google Scholar
Donovan, J., & Jessor, R. (1985). Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53 (6), 890–904.Google Scholar
Durlauf, S. & Nagin, D. (2011). Imprisonment and crime: Can both be reduced? Criminology & Public Policy, 10 (1), 13–54.Google Scholar
Eberhardt, J. (2019). Biased: Uncovering the Hidden Prejudiced That Shapes What We See, Think, and Do, New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Eck, J. (2002). Preventing crime at places. In Sherman, L., Farrington, D., Welsh, B., & MacKenzie, D., eds., Evidence-based crime prevention. New York: Routledge, pp. 241–94.Google Scholar
Engel, R., Corsaro, N., & Ozer, M. (2017). The impact of police on criminal justice reform: Evidence from Cincinnati, Ohio. Criminology & Public Policy, 16 (2), 375–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, R., Corsaro, N., & Skubak Tillyer, M. (2010). Evaluation of the Cincinnati Initiative to Reduce Violence (CIRV), Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati Policing Institute.Google Scholar
Engel, R., Skubak Tillyer, M., & Corsaro, N. (2013). Reducing gang violence using focused deterrence: Evaluating the Cincinnati Initiative to Reduce Violence (CIRV). Justice Quarterly, 30 (3), 403–439.Google Scholar
Esbensen, F. & Huizinga, D. (1993). Gangs, drugs, and delinquency in a survey of urban youth. Criminology, 31 (4), 565–589.Google Scholar
Fagan, J. (2002). Law, social science, and racial profiling. Justice Research and Policy, 4 (1–2), 103–129.Google Scholar
Felson, M. (1986). Routine activities, social controls, rational decisions, and criminal outcomes. In Cornish, D. and Clarke, R., eds., The Reasoning Criminal. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 119–131.Google Scholar
Fox, A., Novak, K., & Yaghoub, M. (2015). Measuring the Impact of Kansas City’s No Violence Alliance, Kansas City, MO: Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology, University of Missouri – Kansas City.Google Scholar
Frabutt, J., Shelton, T., Di Luca, K., Harvey, L., & Hefner, M. (2009). A Collaborative Approach to Eliminating Street Drug Markets through Focused Deterrence, Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Goldstein, H. (1990). Problem-Oriented Policing, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
Grasmick, H., & Bursik, R. (1990). Conscience, significant others, and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law & Society Review, 24 (3), 837–862Google Scholar
Griffiths, E., & Christian, J. (2015). Considering focused deterrence in the age of Ferguson, Baltimore, North Charleston, and beyond. Criminology & Public Policy, 14 (3), 573–581.Google Scholar
Grunwald, B., & Papachristos, A. (2017). Project safe neighborhoods in Chicago: Looking back a decade later. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 107 (1), 131–160.Google Scholar
Hamilton, B., Rosenfeld, R., & Levin, A. (2018). Opting out of treatment: Self-selection bias in a randomized controlled study of a focused deterrence notification meeting. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17(1),1–17.Google Scholar
Hawken, A., & Kleiman, M. (2009). Managing Drug Involved Probationers with Swift and Certain Sanctions: Evaluating Hawaii’s HOPE (No. 229023). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Heinrich, T., & Braga, A. (2010). Focused Deterrence and Norm Changing Strategies: The Problem of Sustainability, New York: National Network for Safe Communities.Google Scholar
High Point Police Department (2014). Offender Focused Domestic Violence Initiative: The First Two Years, High Point, NC: High Point Police Department.Google Scholar
Howell, J., & Griffiths, E. (2016). Gangs in America’s Communities, 2nd edn, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2009). Crime, policing and social order: On the expressive nature of public confidence in policing. British Journal of Sociology, 60(3),493–521Google Scholar
Jacobs, E., Campanile, C., & Golding, B. (2020) Bloomberg in leaked 2015 clip: ‘95% of murderers fit one description, Xerox it” New York Post, February 11. https://nypost.com/2020/02/11/leaked-bloomberg-audio-shows-him-defending-throw-them-up-against-the-walls-stop-and-frisk/Google Scholar
Jennings, W., Piquero, A., & Reingle, J. (2012). On the overlap between victimization and offending: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 17 (1), 16–26.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. (2014). 20 years later, parts of major crime bill viewed as terrible mistake. National Public Radio, September 12. www.npr.org/2014/09/12/347736999/20-years-later-major-crime-bill-viewed-as-terrible-mistakeGoogle Scholar
Jonathan-Zamir, T., & Weisburd, D. (2013). The effects of security threats on antecedents of police legitimacy: Findings from a quasi-experiment in Israel. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 50 (1), 3–32.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (1990). Fighting the Drug Trade in Link Valley, John F. Kennedy School of Government Case Study Cl6-90–935.0, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (1997). Pulling levers: Chronic offenders, high-crime settings, and a theory of prevention. Valparaiso University Law Review, 31 (2): 449–484.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2004). Rethinking law enforcement strategies to prevent domestic violence. Networks, 19 (2–3), 8–15.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2019). Policing and the lessons of focused deterrence. In Weisburd, D. and Braga, A., eds., Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives, 2nd edn. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–226.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2008). Deterrence and Crime Prevention: Reconsidering the Prospect of Sanction, London, UK: Routledge Press.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2009a). Drugs, race and common ground: reflections on the High Point intervention. National Institute of Justice Journal, 262, 12–17.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2009b). Gangs and public policy: Constructing and deconstructing gang databases. Criminology & Public Policy, 8 (4), 711–716.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2011). Don’t shoot: One man, a street fellowship, and the end of violence in inner-city America, New York: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D. (2016). Using the drug market intervention strategy to address the heroin epidemic. US Attorneys Bulletin, 64 (5), 19–24.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., & Friedrich, M. A. (2014). Custom Notifications: Individualized Communication in the Group Violence Intervention, Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., & Ben-Menachem, J. (2019). Moving toward an American police-community reconciliation framework. In Lave, T. and Miller, E., eds., The Cambridge Handbook of Policing in the United States. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 563–580.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., Braga, A., & Piehl, A. (1997). The (un)known universe: Mapping gangs and gang violence in Boston, In D. Weisburd and McEwen, J., eds., Crime Mapping and Crime Prevention, Crime Prevention Studies, vol. 8. Monsey, New York: Criminal Justice Press, pp. 219–262.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., Braga, A., & Piehl, A. (2001). Reducing Gun Violence: The Boston Gun Project’s Operation Ceasefire, Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., Kleiman, M., & Braga, A. (2017). Beyond deterrence: Strategies of focus and fairness. In Tilley, N. and Sidebottom, A., eds., Handbook of Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 2nd edn. New York: Routledge, pp. 157–182.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., Piehl, A., & Braga, A. (1996). Youth violence in Boston: Gun markets, serious youth offenders, and a use-reduction strategy. Law and Contemporary Problems, 59 (1), 147–196.Google Scholar
Kennedy, D., & Wong, S. (2009). The High Point Drug Market Intervention Strategy, Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Kirk, D., & Papachristos, A. (2011). Cultural mechanisms and the persistence of neighborhood violence. American Journal of Sociology, 116 (4), 1190–1233Google Scholar
Kleck, G., Sever, B., Li, S., & Gertz, M. (2005). The missing link in general deterrence research. Criminology, 43 (3), 623–60.Google Scholar
Kleiman, M. (2009). When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kleiman, M., & Young, R. (1995). The factors of production in retail drug dealing. Urban Affairs Review, 30 (5), 730–748.Google Scholar
Klein, M. (1995). The American Street Gang: Its Nature, Prevalence, and Control. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klein, M. (2011) Comprehensive gang and violence reduction programs: Reinventing the square wheel. Criminology & Public Policy, 10 (4), 1037–1044.Google Scholar
Klofas, J., & Hipple, N. (2006). Crime Incident Reviews, Project Safe Neighborhoods: Strategic Interventions Case Study No. 3., Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.Google Scholar
Langford, L., Isaac, N., & Adams, S. (2000). Criminal and restraining order histories of intimate partner-related homicide offenders in Massachusetts, 1991–1995. In Blackman, P., Leggett, V., Olson, B., and Jarvis, J., eds., The Varieties of Homicide and Its Research: Proceedings of the 1999 Meeting of the Homicide Research Working Group. Washington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation, pp. 57–66.Google Scholar
La Vigne, N., Jannetta, J., Fontaine, J., Lawrence, D., & Esthappan, S. (2019). The National Initiative for Building Community Trust and Justice: Key Process and Outcome Evaluation Findings, Washington, DC: Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Leigh, B. (1999). Peril, chance, adventure: Concepts of risk, alcohol use and risky behavior in young adults. Addiction, 94 (3), 371–83.Google Scholar
Lipsey, M. & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical Meta-Analysis, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Lisak, D., & Miller, P. (2002). Repeated rape and multiple offending among undetected rapists. Violence and Victims, 17 (1), 73–84.Google Scholar
Loughin, E. (2016) Precision policing key to fighting crime. Irish Examiner, December 5. www.irishexaminer.com/ireland/ny-precision-policing-key-to-fighting-city-crime-433665.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ludwig, J., Kling, J., & Mullainathan, S. (2011). Mechanism experiments and policy evaluations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25 (3), 17–38.Google Scholar
Lurie, S. (2019). There’s no such thing as a dangerous neighborhood. CityLab, February 25. www.citylab.com/perspective/2019/02/broken-windows-theory-policing-urban-violence-crime-data/583030/Google Scholar
MacQuarrie, B. (2015). In Rutland, VT, a rare glimmer of hope in battle against opioid addiction. Boston Globe, October 26. www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2015/10/26/rutland-makes-gains-opioid-battle/0xJPia7xu1mQDI3jpFUPVK/story.htmlGoogle Scholar
Martinez, N., Lee, Y., & Eck, J. (2017). Ravenous wolves revisited: A systematic review of offending concentration. Crime Science, 6 (1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40163-017–0072-2CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matthews, R. (2014). Rational choice, routine activities and situational crime prevention. In Matthews, R., Realist Criminology. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 72–93.Google Scholar
McDonald, P. (2002). Managing Police Operations: Implementing the New York Crime Control Model – Compstat, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
McGarrell, E., Chermak, S., Wilson, J., & Corsaro, N. (2006). Reducing homicide through a “lever-pulling” strategy. Justice Quarterly, 23 (2), 214–229.Google Scholar
McGarrell, E., Corsaro, N., Hipple, N., & Bynum, T. (2010). Project safe neighborhoods and violent crime trends in US cities: Assessing violent crime impact. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 26 (2), 165–190.Google Scholar
McGloin, J. (2005). Policy and intervention considerations of a network analysis of street gangs. Criminology & Public Policy, 4 (3), 607–636.Google Scholar
Meares, T. (2009). The legitimacy of police among young African American men. Marquette Law Review, 92 (4), 651–666.Google Scholar
Meares, T., & Kahan, D. (1998). Law and (norms of) order in the inner city. Law and Society Review, 32 (4), 805–838.Google Scholar
Mentel, Z. (2012). Racial Reconciliation, Truth-Telling, and Police Legitimacy, Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
Miethe, T. & Meier, R. (1994). Crime and Its Social Context: Toward an Integrated Theory of Offenders, Victims, and Situations, New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Miller, W. (1975). Violence by Youth Gangs and Youth Groups as a Crime Problem in Major American Cities, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Moore, M. (2002). Recognizing Value in Policing, Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
Moore, M., & Braga, A. (2003). Measuring and improving police performance: The lessons of Compstat and its progeny. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 26 (3), 439–453.Google Scholar
Morgan, S. & Winship, C. (2007). Counterfactuals and Causal Inference: Methods and Principals for Social Research, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagin, D. (2013). Deterrence in the twenty-first century. In Tonry, M., ed., Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 42. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 199–263.Google Scholar
Nagin, D., & Telep, C. (2017). Procedural justice and legal compliance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 13 (1), 5–28.Google Scholar
National Network for Safe Communities. (2013). Group Violence Intervention: An Implementation Guide, Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
National Network for Safe Communities (2014). Drug Market Intervention: An Implementation Guide, Washington, DC: Office of Community Oriented Policing Services.Google Scholar
National Network for Safe Communities (2015). Prison Violence Intervention, New York: John Jay College of Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
National Network for Safe Communities (2016). Implementing the Drug Market Intervention in Emerging Heroin Markets, New York: John Jay College of Criminal Justice.Google Scholar
Osgood, W., Johnston, L., O’Malley, P., & Bachman, J. (1988). The generality of deviance in late adolescence and early adulthood. American Sociological Review, 53 (1), 81–93.Google Scholar
Padilla, F. (1992). The Gang as an American Enterprise, New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Papachristos, A., Braga, A., & Hureau, D. (2012). Social networks and the risk of gunshot injury. Journal of Urban Health, 89 (6), 992–1003.Google Scholar
Papachristos, A., Hureau, D., & Braga, A. (2013). The corner and the crew: The influence of geography and social networks on gang violence. American Sociological Review, 78 (3), 417–447.Google Scholar
Papachristos, A., & Kirk, D. (2015). Changing the street dynamic: Evaluating Chicago’s group violence reduction strategy. Criminology & Public Policy, 14 (3), 525–558.Google Scholar
Papachristos, A., Meares, T., & Fagan, J. (2007). Attention felons: Evaluating project safe neighborhoods in Chicago. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4 (2), 223–272.Google Scholar
Papachristos, A., Meares, T., & Fagan, J. (2012). Why do criminals obey the law? The influence of legitimacy and social networks on active gun offenders. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 102 (2), 397–440.Google Scholar
Papachristos, A., Wildeman, C., & Roberto, E. (2015). Tragic, but not random: The social contagion of nonfatal gunshot injuries. Social Science & Medicine, 125, 139–150.Google Scholar
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Bachman, R., & Sherman, L. W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31(1),163–204.Google Scholar
Piliavin, I., Thornton, C., Gartner, R., & Matsueda, R. (1986) Crime, deterrence, and rational choice. American Sociological Review, 51 (1), 101–119.Google Scholar
Pitts, J. (2007). Reluctant Gangsters: Youth Gangs in Waltham Forest, Bedfordshire, UK: University of Bedfordshire.Google Scholar
Reisig, M., Bratton, J., & Gertz, M. (2007). The construct validity and refinement of process-based policing measures. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 34 (8), 1005–1028.Google Scholar
Reppetto, T. (1976). Crime prevention and the displacement phenomenon. Crime & Delinquency, 22 (2), 166–177.Google Scholar
Roehl, J., Rosenbaum, D., Costello, S., Coldren, J., Schuck, A., Kunard, L., & Forde, D. (2008). Paving the Way for Project Safe Neighborhoods: SACSI in 10 U.S. Cities, Washington, DC: US Department of Justice, National Institute of Justice.Google Scholar
Rolph, J., Chaiken, J., & Houchens, R. (1981). Methods for Estimating the Crime Rates of Individuals, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Roman, C., Forney, M., Hyatt, J., Klein, H., & Link, N. (2019). Law enforcement activities of Philadelphia’s group violence intervention: An examination of arrest, case processing, and probation levers. Police Quarterly, https://doi.org/10.1177/1098611119895069Google Scholar
Roman, C., Link, N., Hyatt, J., Bhati, A., & Forney, M. (2019). Assessing the gang-level and community-level effects of the Philadelphia focused deterrence strategy. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15 (4), 499–527.Google Scholar
Rossi, P. (1987). The iron law of evaluation and other metallic rules. Research in Social Problems and Public Policy, 4, 3–20.Google Scholar
Rowe, M., & Søgaard, T. (2020). ‘Playing the man, not the ball’: targeting organised criminals, intelligence and the problems with pulling levers. Policing and Society, 30 (2), 120–135.Google Scholar
Sampson, R. (2012). Great American City: Chicago and the Enduring Neighborhood Effect, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, R., & Bartusch, D. (1988). Legal cynicism and (subcultural?) tolerance of deviance: The neighborhood context of racial differences. Law & Society Review, 32 (4), 777–804.Google Scholar
Sampson, R., Raudenbush, S., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime. Science, 277, 918–924.Google Scholar
Saunders, J., Kilmer, B., & Ober, A. (2015). A Comprehensive Evaluation of a Drug Market Intervention Training Cohort, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Saunders, J., Lundberg, R., Braga, A., Ridgeway, G., & Miles, J. (2015). A synthetic control approach to evaluating place-based crime interventions. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31 (3), 413–434.Google Scholar
Saunders, J., Ober, A., Kilmer, B., & Greathouse, S. (2016). A Community-Based, Focused-Deterrence Approach to Closing Overt Drug Markets: A Process and Fidelity Evaluation of Seven Sites, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Saunders, J., Robbins, M., & Ober, A. (2017). Moving from efficacy to effectiveness: Implementing the drug market intervention across multiple sites. Criminology & Public Policy, 16 (3), 787–814.Google Scholar
Seabrook, J. (2009). Don’t shoot: A radical approach to the problem of gang violence. The New Yorker, June 22.Google Scholar
Sechrist, S., & Weil, J. (2018). Assessing the impact of a focused deterrence strategy to combat intimate partner domestic violence. Violence Against Women, 24 (3), 243–265.Google Scholar
Shaw, C., & McKay, H. (1942). Juvenile Delinquency in Urban Areas, Chicago: University of Chicago PressGoogle Scholar
Sierra-Arévalo, M. (2016). Legal cynicism and protective gun ownership among active offenders in Chicago. Cogent Social Sciences, 2 (1), 1227293.Google Scholar
Sierra-Arévalo, M., Charette, Y., & Papachristos, A. (2015). Evaluating the Effect of Project Longevity on Group-Involved Shootings and Homicides in New Haven, CT, New Haven, CT: Yale University.Google Scholar
Silverman, E. (1999). NYPD Battles Crime: Innovative Strategies in Policing, Boston: Northeastern University Press.Google Scholar
Skogan, W., & Frydl, K, eds. (2004). Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing: The Evidence, Committee to Review Research on Police Policy and Practices, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Skubak Tillyer, M., Engel, R. & Lovins, B. (2012). Beyond Boston: Applying theory to understand and address sustainability issues in focused deterrence initiatives for violence reduction. Crime & Delinquency, 58 (6), 973–997.Google Scholar
Skubak Tillyer, M., & Kennedy, D. (2008). Locating focused deterrence approaches within a situational crime prevention framework. Crime Prevention and Community Safety, 10(2), 75–84.Google Scholar
Spelman, W. (1990). Repeat Offender Programs, Washington, DC: Police Executive Research Forum.Google Scholar
Stuntz, W. (2011). The Collapse of American Criminal Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. R. (2003). The role of procedural justice and legitimacy in shaping public support for policing. Law and Society Review, 37(3),513–548.Google Scholar
Tankebe, J. (2013). Viewing things differently: The dimensions of public perceptions of police legitimacy. Criminology, 51(1),103–135.Google Scholar
Thacher, D. (2016). Channeling police discretion: The hidden potential of focused deterrence. University of Chicago Legal Forum, http://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/uclf/vol2016/iss1/13Google Scholar
The Local. (2019). Malmö pushes ahead with US anti-gang method after shootings, November 13. www.thelocal.se/20191113/malm-police-push-ahead-with-anti-gang-method-despite-shootigsGoogle Scholar
Tita, G., Riley, K., Ridgeway, G., Grammich, C., Abrahamse, A., & Greenwood, P. (2004). Reducing Gun Violence: Results from an Intervention in East Los Angeles, Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.Google Scholar
Travis, J. (1998). Crime, justice, and public policy. Plenary presentation to the American Society of Criminology, Washington, DC, November 12, www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/speeches/asc.htmGoogle Scholar
Trinkner, R. (2019). Addressing the “black box” of focused deterrence: An examination of the mechanisms of change in Chicago’s Project Safe Neighborhoods. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 15 (4), 673–683.Google Scholar
Turanovic, J., Reisig, M., & Pratt, T. (2015). Risky lifestyles, low self-control, and violent victimization across gendered pathways to crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 31 (2), 183–206.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. (2003). Procedural justice, legitimacy, and the effective rule of law. In Tonry, M., ed., Crime and Justice: A Review of Research, vol. 30. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 283–357.Google Scholar
Tyler, T. (2006). Why People Obey the Law, 2nd edn, Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Tyler, T., Fagan, J., & Geller, A. (2014). Street stops and police legitimacy: Teachable moments in young urban men’s legal socialization. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 11 (4), 751–785.Google Scholar
Tyler, T., Goff, P., & MacCoun, R. (2015). The impact of psychological science on policing in the United States: Procedural justice, legitimacy, and effective law enforcement. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16 (3), 75–109.Google Scholar
Tyler, T., & Wakslak, C. (2004). Profiling and police legitimacy: Procedural justice, attributions of motive, and acceptance of police authority. Criminology, 42(2), 253–282.Google Scholar
Vigil, J. (1988). Barrio Gangs: Street Life and Identity in Southern California, Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, D., Papachristos, A., Meares, T., & Fagan, J. (2016). Desistance and legitimacy: The impact of offender notification meetings on recidivism among high risk offenders. Justice Quarterly, 33 (1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Warr, M. (2002). Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D. (2015). The law of crime concentration and the criminology of place. Criminology, 53 (2), 133–157.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Braga, A., eds. (2019). Police Innovation: Contrasting Perspectives, 2nd edn, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Eck, J. (2004). What can police do to reduce crime, disorder and fear? The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 593, 42–65.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Green, L. (1995). Policing drug hot spots: The Jersey City DMA experiment. Justice Quarterly, 12 (3), 711–736.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., Lum, C., & Petrosino, A. (2001). Does research design affect study outcomes in criminal justice? The Annals of the American Academy of Social and Political Sciences, 578, 50–70.Google Scholar
Weisburd, D., & Majmundar, M. K., eds. (2018). Proactive Policing: Effects on Crime and Communities, Committee on Proactive Policing: Effects on Crime, Communities, and Civil Liberties, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Wellford, C., & Cronin, J. (1999). An Analysis of Variables Affecting the Clearance of Homicides: A Multistate Study, Washington, DC: Justice Research and Statistics Association.Google Scholar
Wellford, C., Pepper, J., & Petrie, C., eds. (2005). Firearms and Violence: A Critical Review, Committee to Improve Research Information and Data on Firearms, Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A., McLean, S., Becker, K., & Worden, R. 2019. Choosing Representatives to Deliver the Message in a Group Violence Intervention. Justice Evaluation Journal, 2 (2), 93–117.Google Scholar
Williams, D., Currie, D., Linden, W., & Donnelly, P. (2014). Addressing gang-related violence in Glasgow: A preliminary pragmatic quasi-experimental evaluation of the community initiative to reduce violence (CIRV). Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19 (6), 686–691.Google Scholar
Williams, K., & Hawkins, R. (1986). Perceptual research on general deterrence: A critical review. Law & Society Review, 20 (4), 545–572.Google Scholar
Winship, C. & Berrien, J. (1999). Boston Cops and Black Churches. The Public Interest, Summer, 52–68.Google Scholar
Wolfgang, M., Figlio, R., & Sellin, T. (1972). Delinquency in a Birth Cohort. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Wong, J., Gravel, J. et al. (2012). Effectiveness of Street Gang Control Strategies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Evaluation Studies, Ottawa, CA: Public Safety Canada.Google Scholar
Wood, G., & Papachristos, A. (2019). Reducing gunshot victimization in high-risk social networks through direct and spillover effects. Nature Human Behaviour, 3, 1164–1170.Google Scholar
Worden, R., & McLean, S. (2017). Mirage of Police Reform: Procedural Justice and Police Legitimacy, Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wright, R., &. Decker, S. (1997) Armed Robbers in Action: Stickups and Street Culture, Boston: Northeastern University PressGoogle Scholar
Zimring, F. (1981). Kids, groups, and crime: Some implications of a well-known secret. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 72 (3), 867–885.Google Scholar
Zimring, F., & Hawkins, G. (1973). Deterrence: The Legal Threat in Crime Control, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 34
- Cited by