Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-6bb9c88b65-fsdjw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-25T13:22:17.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Series:   Elements in Generative AI in Education

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Language Teaching

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 June 2025

Benjamin Luke Moorhouse  and
Kevin M. Wong
Benjamin Luke Moorhouse
Affiliation:
City University of Hong Kong
Kevin M. Wong
Affiliation:
Pepperdine University

Summary

The development of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has led to intense wonder, surprise, excitement, and concern within the language teaching profession. These tools offer the potential to assist language teachers in helping their learners achieve their language learning goals, and at the same time, risk disrupting language teaching and learning processes, the teaching profession, and possibly the instrumental needs to learn foreign languages. This Element provides an accessible introduction and guide to the use of GenAI for language teaching. It aims to facilitate language teachers' development of the professional knowledge and skills they need to use GenAI responsibly, ethically and effectively. The Element It is a valuable resource for pre-service and in-service language teachers of all experience levels. Each section includes helpful tips and questions for reflection to get teachers started with GenAI while ensuring they engage critically and responsibly with these tools. Evidence-informed approaches are promoted throughout the Element.
Get access

Keywords

generative AIlanguage teachingprofessional digital competenceevidence-informedAI literacy

Information

Type
Element
Information
Series: Elements in Generative AI in Education
Online ISBN: 9781009618823
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication: 24 July 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Element purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Al-khresheh, M. H. (2024). Bridging technology and pedagogy from a global lens: Teachers’ perspectives on integrating ChatGPT in English language teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100218.Google Scholar
Ali, O., Murray, P. A., Momin, M., Dwivedi, Y. K., & Malik, T.. (2024). The effects of artificial intelligence applications in educational settings: Challenges and strategies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 199, 123076.10.1016/j.techfore.2023.123076CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bai, L., Liu, X., & Su, J. (2023). ChatGPT: The cognitive effects on learning and memory. Brain-X, 1(3), e30. https://doi.org/10.1002/brx2.30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, W. (2012). From cultural awareness to intercultural awareness: Culture in ELT. ELT Journal, 66, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1093/ELT/CCR017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrot, J. S. (2020). Integrating technology into ESL/EFL writing through Grammarly. RELC Journal, 53(3), 764–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688220966632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57, 100745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauml, M. (2014). Collaborative lesson planning as professional development for beginning primary teachers. The New Educator, 10(3), 182–200.10.1080/1547688X.2014.925741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bax, S. (2003). CALL: Past, present, and future. System, 31(1), 13–28.10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00071-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birss, D. (2023) How to research and write using generative AI tools. LinkedIn Learning, formerly Lynda.com. www.linkedin.com/learning/how-to-research-and-write-using-generative-ai-tools.Google Scholar
Bonner, E., Lege, R. & Frazier, E. (2023). Large language model-based artificial intelligence in the language classroom: Practical ideas for teaching. Teaching English with Technology, 23(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.56297/bkam1691/wieo1749.Google Scholar
Brown, T., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., & Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper_files/paper/2020.Google Scholar
Cain, W. (2023). Prompting change: Exploring prompt engineering in large language model AI and its potential to transform education. TechTrends, 68(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-023-00896-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, L. & Dede, C. (2023). Navigating a World of Generative AI: Suggestions for Educators. The Next Level Lab at Harvard Graduate School of Education. https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/websites.harvard.edu/dist/a/108/files/2023/08/Cao_Dede_final_8.4.23.pdf.Google Scholar
Chan, C. K. Y., & Colloton, T. (2024). Generative AI in Higher Education: The ChatGPT Effect. Routledge.10.4324/9781003459026CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z., Liu, T., & Liu, X. (2024). Twee: Artificial intelligence assistant to generate versatile materials for language education. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882241282471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiu, T. K., Moorhouse, B. L., Chai, C. S., & Ismailov, M. (2023). Teacher support and student motivation to learn with artificial intelligence (AI) based chatbot. Interactive Learning Environments, 32(7), 3240–3256. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2023.2172044.Google Scholar
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2024). The educational affordances and challenges of ChatGPT: State of the field. TechTrends, 68, 380–392. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00939-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darvin, R. (2025). The need for critical digital literacies in generative AI-mediated L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 67, 101186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2025.101186.Google Scholar
Dewey, J. (1933). How We Think: A Restatement of the Relation of Reflective Thinking to the Educative Process. D. C. Health and Company.Google Scholar
Dooley, M., Thrasher, T., & Sadler, R. (2023). ‘Whoa! incredible!’: Language learning experiences in virtual reality. RELC Journal, 54(2), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231167610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Draxler, F., Werner, A., Lehmann, F., Hoppe, M., Schmidt, A., Buschek, D., & Welsch, R. (2024). The AI ghostwriter effect: When users do not perceive ownership of AI-generated text but self-declare as authors. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 31(2), 1–40. https://doi.org/10.1145/3637875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dwivedi, Y. K., Kshetri, N., Hughes, L., Slade, E. L., Jeyaraj, A., Kar, A. K., Wright, R. (2023). Opinion paper: ‘So what if ChatGPT wrote it?’ Multidisciplinary perspectives on opportunities, challenges and implications of generative conversational AI for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 71, 102642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt:.2023.102642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2023). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 460–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fryer, L. K., Coniam, D., Carpenter, R., & Lăpușneanu, D. (2020). Bots for language learning now: Current and future directions. Language, Learning and Technology, 24(2), 8–22.Google Scholar
Fui-Hoon Nah, F., Zheng, R., Cai, J., Siau, K., & Chen, L. (2023). Generative AI and ChatGPT: Applications, challenges, and AI-human collaboration. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 25(3), 277–304.10.1080/15228053.2023.2233814CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 5–24. http://doi.org/10125/73474.Google Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R. (2024). Distributed agency in second language learning and teaching through generative AI. Language Learning & Technology, 28(2), 5–30. https://doi.org/10125/73570.Google Scholar
Gruber, P. (2023) Using ChatGPT for efficient data analysis with R. Instats Inc. https://doi.org/10.61700/XWWIQWCMK4X0R469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harmer, J. (2015). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Pearson.Google Scholar
Hockly, N. (2023). Artificial intelligence in English language teaching: The good, the bad and the ugly. RELC Journal, 54(2): 445–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231168504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hong, W. C. H. (2023). The impact of ChatGPT on foreign language teaching and learning: Opportunities in education and research. Journal of Educational Technology and Innovation, 5(1), 37–45. https://jeti.thewsu.org/index.php/cieti/article/view/103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37–45.10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobs, H. H., & Fisher, M. (2023). Prompt literacy: A key for AI-based learning. www.ascd.org/el/articles/prompt-literacy-a-key-for-ai-based-learning.Google Scholar
Javier, D. R. C., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2023). Developing secondary school English language learners’ productive and critical use of ChatGPT. TESOL Journal, (e755), 1–9.Google Scholar
Jeon, J., & Lee, S. (2023). Large language models in education: A focus on the complementary relationship between human teachers and ChatGPT. Education and Information Technologies, 28, 5873–15892. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11834-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274.10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerr, P. (2014). Translation and Own-Language Activities. Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009024815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoth, N., Tolzin, A., & Janson, A. (2024). AI literacy and its implications for prompt engineering strategies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 49(4), 100225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100225.Google Scholar
Kohnke, L. (2023). Using Technology to Design ESL/EFL Microlearning Activities. Springer.10.1007/978-981-99-2774-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnke, L., & Jarvis, A. (2023). Developing infographics for English for academic purposes courses. TESOL Journal, 14, e675. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.6753-197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnke, L., Foung, D., & Zou, D. (2024). Microlearning: A new normal for flexible teacher professional development in online and blended learning. Education and Information Technologies, 29(4), 4457–4480.10.1007/s10639-023-11964-6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnke, L., Foung, D., Zou, D., & Jiang, M. (2024). Creating the conditions for professional digital competence through microlearning. Educational Technology & Society, 27(1), 18.Google Scholar
Kohnke, L., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2024). An exploration of microlearning as continuous professional development for English language teachers: Initial findings and insights. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1–17.10.1080/02680513.2024.2362649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). Using ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohnke, L. & Zou, D. (2024). The role of ChatGPT in enhancing English teaching: A paradigm shift in lesson planning and instructional practice. Educational Technology and Society, 28(3), 4–20.Google Scholar
König, J., Jäger-Biela, D. J., & Glutsch, N. (2020). Adapting to online teaching during Covid-19 school closure: Teacher education and teacher competence effects among early career teachers in Germany. European Journal of Teacher Education, 43(4), 608–622.10.1080/02619768.2020.1809650CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kostka, I., & Toncelli, R. (2023). Exploring applications of ChatGPT to English language teaching: Opportunities, challenges, and recommendations. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign Language, 27(3). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.27107int.Google Scholar
Lee, Y. J. (2020). The long-term effect of automated writing evaluation feedback on writing development. English Teaching, 75(1), 67–92.10.15858/engtea.75.1.202003.67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S., & Jeon, J. (2024). Enhancing pre-service EFL teachers’ TPACK through chatbot-integrated lesson planning projects. Language Learning & Technology, 28(1), 1–20. https://hdl.handle.net/10125/73598.Google Scholar
Lim, W. M., Gunasekara, A., Pallant, J. L., Pallant, J. I., & Pechenkina, E. (2023). Generative AI and the future of education: Ragnarök or reformation? A paradoxical perspective from management educators. International Journal of Management in Education, 21(2), 100790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2023.100790.Google Scholar
Lo, L. S. (2023). The CLEAR path: A framework for enhancing information literacy through prompt engineering. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 49(4), 102720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2023.102720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucchi, N. (2023). ChatGPT: A case study on copyright challenges for generative artificial intelligence systems. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lund, B. D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N. R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and a new academic reality: Artificial intelligence‐written research papers and the ethics of the large language models in scholarly publishing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 74(5), 570–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maloy, R. W., & Gattupalli, S. (2024). Prompt literacy. EdTechnica, https://doi.org/10.59668/371.14442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGrath, I. (2016). Materials Evaluation and Design for Language Teaching. Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748694822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meniado, J. C. ( 2023). Digital language teaching 5.0: Technologies, trends and competencies. RELC Journal, 54(2), 461–473.10.1177/00336882231160610CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, J. (2001). Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 5(4), 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9481.00163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishan, F. (2015). Materials Development for TESOL. Edinburgh University Press.10.1515/9780748691371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, P., Warr, M., & Islam, R. (2023). TPACK in the age of ChatGPT and generative AI. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 39(4), 235–251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2023.2247480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizumoto, A., & Eguchi, M. (2023). Exploring the potential of using an AI language model for automated essay scoring. Research Methods in Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 100050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmal.2023.100050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, B. L. (2023). Teachers’ digital technology use after a period of online teaching. ELT Journal, 77(4), 445–457.10.1093/elt/ccac050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, B. L. ( 2024). Generative artificial intelligence and ELT. ELT Journal, 78(4), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccae032.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, B. L., Ho, T. Y., Wu, C., & Wan, Y. (2025). Pre-service language teachers’ task-specific large language model prompting practices. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882251313701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, B. L., & Kohnke, L. (2024). The effects of generative AI on initial language teacher education: The perceptions of teacher educators. System, 122, 103290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, B. L., Wan, Y., Ho, T. Y., & Lin, A. M. (2024). Generative AI-assisted, evidence-informed use of L1 in L2 classrooms. ELT Journal, 78(4), 453–465.10.1093/elt/ccae033CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, B. L., Wong, K. M., & Li, L. (2023). Teaching with technology in the post-pandemic digital age: Technological normalisation and AI-induced disruptions. RELC Journal, 54(2), 311–320. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231176929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorhouse, B. L., & Yan, L. (2023). Use of digital tools by English language schoolteachers. Education Sciences, 13(3), 226.10.3390/educsci13030226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Su, J., Ng, R. C. W., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Teachers’ AI digital competencies and twenty-first century skills in the post-pandemic world. Educational Technology Research & Development, 71(1), 137–161.10.1007/s11423-023-10203-6CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palfreyman, D. M., & Benson, P. (2019). Autonomy and its role in English language learning: Practice and research. In Second Handbook of English Language Teaching, Gao, X., editor. Springer, 661–681.10.1007/978-3-030-02899-2_38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinter, A. (2017). Teaching Young Language Learners. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Porter, B., & Machery, E. (2024) AI-generated poetry is indistinguishable from human-written poetry and is rated more favorably. Scientific Reports, 14, 26133. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-76900-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinhardt, K. S., & Elwood, S. (2019). Promising practices in online training and support: Microlearning and personal learning environments to promote a growth mindset in learners. In Handbook of Research on Virtual Training and Mentoring of Online Instructors, 298–310. IGI Global.Google Scholar
Richards, J. C. (2010). Competence and performance in language teaching. RELC Journal, 41(2), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688210372953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. C. (2015). Materials design in language teacher education: An example from Southeast Asia. In International Perspectives on English Language Teacher Education: Innovations from the Field, 90–106. Palgrave Macmillan UK.10.1057/9781137440068_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2014). Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching (Third Edition). Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781009024532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rifkin, B. (2003). Oral proficiency learning outcomes and curricular design. Foreign Language Annals, 36(4), 582–588.10.1111/j.1944-9720.2003.tb02148.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarino, A. (2009). Assessing intercultural capability in learning languages: Some issues and considerations. Language Teaching, 42, 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444808005417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scrivener, J. (2011). Learning Teaching. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Shaikh, S., Daudpota, S. M., Yayilgan, S. Y., & Sindhu, S. (2023 ). Exploring the potential of large-language models (LLMs) for student feedback sentiment analysis. In 2023 International Conference on Frontiers of Information Technology (FIT), 214–219. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.10.1109/FIT60620.2023.00047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shin, D., & Lee, J. H. (2023). Can ChatGPT make reading comprehension testing items on par with human experts? Language Learning & Technology, 27(3), 27–40.Google Scholar
Smith, G., Fleisig, E., Bossi, M., Rustagi, I., & Yin, X. (2024). Standard language ideology in AI-generated language. arXiv, arXiv:2406.08726.Google Scholar
Speechace (2024). Speaking test. Speechace. www.speechace.com/speaking-test/.Google Scholar
Stahl, B. C., & Eke, D. (2024). The ethics of ChatGPT: Exploring the ethical issues of an emerging technology. International Journal of Information Management, 74, 102700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2023.102700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiss, J., Tate, T., Graham, S., Cruz, J., Hebert, M., Wang, J., & Olson, C. B. (2024). Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing. Learning and Instruction, 91, 101894.10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, G., & Wang, Y. (2023). Exploring the challenges of technology in language teaching in the aftermath of the pandemic. RELC Journal, 54(2), 474–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231168438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stockwell, G., & Wang, Y. (2024). Expanding the learning ecology and autonomy of language learners with mobile technologies. Educational Technology and Society, 27(2), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.30191/ETS.202404_27(2).SP05.Google Scholar
Strokel-Walker, C. (2024, May 1). AI chatbots have thoroughly infiltrated scientific publishing. Scientific American. www.scientificamerican.com/article/chatbots-have-thoroughly-infiltrated-scientific-publishing/.Google Scholar
Thornbury, S. (1999). How to Teach Grammar. LongmanGoogle Scholar
Thorne, S. L. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 38–67. http://llt.msu.edu/vol7num2/thorne/.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, B. (2014). 7 teacher growth through materials development. The European Journal of Applied Linguistics and TEFL, 3(2), 89–107.Google Scholar
Tomlinson, B. (2015). Developing principled materials for young learners of English as a foreign. In Teaching English to Young Learners: Critical Issues in Language Teaching with 3-12 Year Olds, Bland, J., editor. Bloomsbury, 279.Google Scholar
Trust, T. (2023). Essential considerations for addressing the possibility of AI-driven cheating, part 2. www.facultyfocus.com/articles/teaching-with-technology-articles/essential-considerations-for-addressing-the-possibility-of-ai-driven-cheating-part-2/.Google Scholar
Tseng, W., & Warschauer, M. (2023). AI-writing tools in education: If you can’t beat them, join them. Journal of China Computer-Assisted Language Learning, 3(2), 258–262.10.1515/jccall-2023-0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van den Berg, G. & E. du Plessis (2023). ChatGPT and generative AI: Possibilities for its contribution to lesson planning, critical thinking and openness in teacher education. Education Sciences, 13(10), 998. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walters, W. H., & Wilder, E. I. (2023). Fabrication and errors in the bibliographic citations generated by ChatGPT. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 14045. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-41032-5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wan, Y., & Moorhouse, B. L. (2024). Using Call Annie as a generative artificial intelligence speaking partner for language learners. RELC Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231224813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, L., Chen, X., Deng, X., Wen, H., You, M., Liu, W., Li, Q., & Li, J. (2024). Prompt engineering in consistency and reliability with the evidence-based guideline for LLMs. npj Digital Medicine, 7, 41. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-024-01029-4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warschauer, M., Tseng, W., Yim, S., Webster, T., Jacob, S., Du, Q., & Tate, T. (2023). The affordances and contradictions of AI-generated text for writers of English as a second or foreign language. Journal of Second Language Writing. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4404380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeo, M. A., Moorhouse, B. L., & Wan, Y. (2025). From academic text to talk-show: Deepening engagement and understanding with Google NotebookLM. TESL-EJ, 28(4), 1–14.10.55593/ej.28112intCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, R., & Zou, D. (2024). Self-regulated second language learning: A review of types and benefits of strategies, modes of teacher support, and pedagogical implications. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(4), 720–765.10.1080/09588221.2022.2055081CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Accessibility standard: Inaccessible, or known limited accessibility

The PDF of this Element is known to have missing or limited accessibility features. We may be reviewing its accessibility for future improvement, but final compliance is not yet assured and may be subject to legal exceptions. If you have any questions, please contact accessibility@cambridge.org.

Content Navigation

Table of contents navigation
Allows you to navigate directly to chapters, sections, or non‐text items through a linked table of contents, reducing the need for extensive scrolling.

Reading Order & Textual Equivalents

Single logical reading order
You will encounter all content (including footnotes, captions, etc.) in a clear, sequential flow, making it easier to follow with assistive tools like screen readers.
Short alternative textual descriptions
You get concise descriptions (for images, charts, or media clips), ensuring you do not miss crucial information when visual or audio elements are not accessible.

Visual Accessibility

Use of colour is not sole means of conveying information
You will still understand key ideas or prompts without relying solely on colour, which is especially helpful if you have colour vision deficiencies.

Structural and Technical Features

ARIA roles provided
You gain clarity from ARIA (Accessible Rich Internet Applications) roles and attributes, as they help assistive technologies interpret how each part of the content functions.

Save element to Kindle

To save this element to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Language Teaching
Available formats
×

Save element to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Language Teaching
Available formats
×

Save element to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Generative Artificial Intelligence and Language Teaching
Available formats
×