Element contents
Human Dignity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 June 2026
Summary
What is human dignity? Kant's philosophy is a central inspiration for our contemporary conception that all human beings deserve respect – independently of their race, gender, religion, or social status. In this Element, I shall address four topics in Kant's moral philosophy: What specifically does one have to do (or refrain fromdoing) to respect a human being? What is the reason why one should respect human beings? What is dignity, that is, what does the term mean, and what kind of thing is it? Finally, in a short appendix, I shall address the questions: Do only human beings deserve respect; how could one extend it to nonhuman animals as well? In each section, I shall offer a range of different interpretations of how one can read Kant's texts, and I shall address their advantages and disadvantages. This gives readers the option to choose for themselves which reading is the most plausible interpretation of human dignity.
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108529655Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 31 July 2026
References
Allais, Lucy (2016) ‘Kant’s Racism’. Philosophical Papers, 45, 1–36.10.1080/05568641.2016.1199170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allison, Henry (2011) Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ameriks, Karl (2004) Kantian Dignity and its Difficulties. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bacin, Stefano (2015) ‘Kant’s Idea of Human Dignity’. Kant-Studien, 106, 97–106.10.1515/kant-2015-0008CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bader, Ralf (2015) ‘The dignity of humanity’. In Buss, S. and Theunissen, N. (eds.), Rethinking the Value of Humanity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 153–80.Google Scholar
Beauchamp, Tom and Childress, James (1994) Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bojanowski, Jochen (2015) ‘Kant on Human Dignity’. Kant-Studien, 106, 78–87.10.1515/kant-2015-0006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Britton, Andy (unpublished) ‘Kant and the Ground(s) of Dignity’.Google Scholar
Cicero, M. T. (1913) De Officiis, tra. Miller., W. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Cummiskey, David (1996) Kantian Consequentialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cureton, Adam and van der Rijt, Jan-Willem (eds.) (2022) Human Dignity and the Kingdom of Ends. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Darwall, Stephen (2008) ‘Kant on Respect, Dignity, and the Duty of Respect’. In Betzler, M. (ed.), Kant’s Ethics of Virtue (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 175–99.Google Scholar
Dean, Richard (2006) The Value of Humanity in Kant’s Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199285721.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Remy, Debes (2021) ‘Respect. A History’. In Dean, R. and Sensen, O. (eds.), Respect (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
Denis, Lara (2010) ‘Humanity, Obligation, and the Good Will’. Kantian Review, 15, 118–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engstrom, Stephen (2009) The Form of Practical Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fahmy, Melissa (2023) ‘Never Merely as a Means: Rethinking the Role and Relevance of Consent’. Kantian Review, 28, 41–62.10.1017/S136941542200053XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feinberg, Joel (1973) ‘Some Conjectures about the Concept of Respect’. Social Philosophy, 4, 1–3.10.1111/j.1467-9833.1973.tb00163.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Formosa, Paul (2017) Kantian Ethics, Dignity and Perfection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/9781316987308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillessen, Jens (2014) Was, wenn jeder … ? Alber: Freiburg.10.5771/9783495998533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, James (2008) On Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199238781.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griffin, Miriam (2017) ‘Dignity in Roman and Stoic Thought.’ In Debes, R. (ed.), Dignity (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 47–65.Google Scholar
Guyer, Paul (2016) Virtues of Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198755647.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, Thomas (1973) ‘Servility and Self-Respect’. The Monist, 57, 87–104.10.5840/monist197357135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kain, Patrick (2010) ‘Duties regarding animals’. In Denis, L. (ed.), Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals. A Critical Guide (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 210–33.Google Scholar
Kain, Patrick (2017) ‘Dignity and the Paradox of Method’. In dos Santos, R. and Schmidt, E. (eds.), Realism and Antirealism in Kant’s Moral Philosophy (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 67–90.10.1515/9783110574517-004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, Y. and Schӧnrich, G. (eds.) (2020) Kant’s Concept of Dignity. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel (2001) ‘Korsgaard’s Kantian Arguments for the Value of Humanity’. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 31, 23–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel (2006) ‘Deriving the Formula of Humanity’. In Horn, C. and Schönecker, D. (eds.), Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 200–21.Google Scholar
Kerstein, Samuel (2013) How to Treat Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199692033.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2007) ‘Kant’s Second Thoughts on Race’. Philosophical Quarterly, 57, 573–592.10.1111/j.1467-9213.2007.498.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kleingeld, Pauline (2020) ‘How to Use Someone “Merely as a Means”’. Kantian Review, 25, 389–414.10.1017/S1369415420000229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klemme, Heiner (2015) ‘Die vernünftige Natur existirt als Zweck an sich selbst’. Kant-Studien, 106, 88–96.10.1515/kant-2015-0007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996a) Creating the Kingdom of Ends. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1996b) The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554476CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (1998) ‘Motivation, Metaphysics, and the Value of the Self’. Ethics, 109, 49–66.10.1086/233873CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (2009) Self-Constitution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552795.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korsgaard, Christine (2018) Fellow Creatures. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780198753858.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, Apaar (2021) ‘Kant on the Ground of Human Dignity’. Kantian Review, 26, 435–53.10.1017/S1369415420000588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langton, Rai (2007) ‘Objective and Unconditioned Value’. Philosophical Review, 116, 157–85.10.1215/00318108-2006-034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leo the Great (1996) Sermons, tra. by J. P. Freeland, and Conway, A. J.. Washington, DC: The Catholic University of America Press.Google Scholar
Lu-Adler, Huaping (2023) Kant, Race, and Racism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780197685211.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markovits, Julia (2014) Moral Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199567171.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Adrienne (2006) ‘How to Argue for the Value of Humanity’. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 87, 96–125.10.1111/j.1468-0114.2006.00249.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mieth, Corinna and Rosenthal, Jacob (2022) ‘Blind Spots in the Formula of Humanity: What Does it Mean not to Treat Someone as an End?’ In Horn, C. and dos Santos, R. (eds.), Kant’s Theory of Value (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 89–104.10.1515/9783110796056-007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, John Stuart (2015) On Liberty, Utilitarianism, and Other Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/owc/9780199670802.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mills, Charles (2005) ‘Kant’s Untermenschen’. In Valls, A. (eds.), Race and Racism in Modern Philosophy (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press), pp. 169–93.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. (1903) Principia Ethica, ed. by Baldwin, T.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas (1970) The Possibility of Altruism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
OED: Oxford English Dictionary Online (2020), ‘respect, n. (and int.)’. Oxford University Press. www.oed.com/view/Entry/163779?rskey=TY50DE&result=1&isAdvanced=false (accessed June 28, 2020).Google Scholar
O’Neill, Onora (2002) Autonomy and Trust in Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511606250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
della Mirandola, Pico (1486) On the Dignity of Man, tra. by Wallis., C. G. Indianapolis: The Bobbs-Merrill, 1998.Google Scholar
Porcheddu, Rocco (2016) Der Zweck an sich selbst. Berlin: de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110434637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rauscher, Fred (2014) ‘Review of Oliver Sensen. Kant on Human Dignity’. Kantian Review, 19, 491–5.Google Scholar
Rawls, John (2000) Lectures on the History of Moral Philosophy, ed. B. Herman, . Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews (2012) ‘Formal Approaches to Kant’s Formula of Humanity’. In Timmons, M. and Baiasu, S. (eds.), Kant on Practical Justification (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 201–27.Google Scholar
Reath, Andrews (2013) ‘The Ground of Practical Laws’. In Bacin, S., Ferrarin, A., Rocca, C. La and Rufffing, M. (eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 571–82.Google Scholar
Rosen, Michael (2012) Dignity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674065512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayre-McCord, Geoffrey (2001) ‘Mill’s “Proof” of the Principle of Utility’. Social Philosophy and Policy, 18, 330–60.10.1017/S0265052500003009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, Thomas (2008) Moral Dimensions. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674043145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schӧnecker, Dieter and Schmidt, Elke (2017) ‘Kant’s Ground-Thesis. On Value and Dignity in the Groundwork’. Journal of Value Inquiry, 52, 81–95.10.1007/s10790-017-9603-zCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schӧnecker, Dieter and Wood, Allen (2015) Immanuel Kant’s Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/harvard.9780674736214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (2017) ‘Kant’s Constitutivism’. In dos Santos, R. and Schmidt, E. (eds.), Realism and Antirealism in Kant’s Moral Philosophy (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 197–220.10.1515/9783110574517-009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (2021) ‘How to Treat Someone with Respect’. In Dean, R. and Sensen, O. (eds.), Respect (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 99–117.10.1093/oso/9780198824930.003.0005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (2022a) ‘Kant’s Value Prescriptivism’. In Horn, C. and dos Santos, R. (eds.), Kant’s Theory of Value (Berlin: de Gruyter), pp. 23–40.10.1515/9783110796056-004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (2022b) ‘Autonomy after Kant’. In Colburn, B. (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Autonomy (London: Routledge), pp. 55–64.10.4324/9780429290411-7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (2023) ‘Universal Law and Poverty Relief’. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 26, 177–90.10.1007/s10677-022-10281-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (2024) ‘The Moral Law as an a Priori Principle’. Kant-Studien, 115, 365–83.10.1515/kant-2024-2027CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (2026a) ‘Ethics as a Doctrine of Ends’. In Zimmermann, S. (ed.), Right and Ethics in Kant’s Metaphysics of Morals (Berlin: de Gruyter), forthcoming.Google Scholar
Sensen, Oliver (2026b) ‘The Fact of Reason and the Justification of the Categorical Imperative’. In Horn, C., Schäfer, R. and Ruffing, M. (eds.), Kant’s Project of Enlightenment (Berlin: de Gruyter), forthcoming.Google Scholar
Shafer-Landau, Russ (2003) Moral Realism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199259755.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, Peter (1972) ‘Famine, Affluence, and Morality’. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1, 229–43.Google Scholar
Singer, Peter (2009) ‘Speciesism and Moral Status’. Metaphilosophy, 40, 567–81.10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01608.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stern, Robert (2015) Kantian Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198722298.001.0001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sticker, Martin (2023) ‘Poverty, Exploitation, Mere Things and Mere Means’. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 26, 191–207.10.1007/s10677-021-10238-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2006) ‘Value Without Regress’. European Journal of Philosophy, 14, 69–93.10.1111/j.1468-0378.2006.00244.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timmermann, Jens (2012) ‘Autonomy and Moral Regard for Ends’. In Sensen, O. (ed.), Kant on Moral Autonomy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 212–24.Google Scholar
Timmons, Mark (2021) Kant’s Doctrine of Virtue: A Guide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Turan, Caner (2019) ‘Necessary Constructivism in Kant’s Moral Theory’. In Aguilar, R. G. (ed.), The Philosophy of Kant (New York: Nova Science Publishers), pp. 187–212.Google Scholar
Watkins, Eric and FitzPatrick, William (2002) ‘O’Neill and Korsgaard on the Construction of Normativity’. Journal of Value Inquiry, 36, 349–67.10.1023/A:1016164822219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, B. (1973) “A Critique of Utilitarianism.” In Utlitarianism For and Against, ed. Smart, J. J. C. and Williams, Bernard, Cambridge University Press, pp. 75–155.Google Scholar
Wood, Allen (1999) Kant’s Ethical Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139173254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Georg Henrik van (1963) The Varieties of Goodness. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
UN (1967). International Covenants on Human Rights. New York: United Nations Office of Public Information.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.