Element contents
Identity Development during STEM Integration for Underrepresented Minority Students
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 October 2020
Summary
Over the past three decades, research efforts and interventions have been implemented across the United States to increase the persistence of underrepresented minority (URM) students in science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM). This Element systematically compares STEM interventions that offer resources and opportunities related to mentorship, research, and more. We organize the findings of this literature into a multi-phase framework of STEM integration and identity development. We propose four distinct phases of STEM integration: Phase 1: High School; Phase 2: Summer before College; Phase 3: First Year of College; and Phase 4: Second Year of College through Graduation. We combine tenets of theories about social identity, stereotypes and bias, and the five-factor operationalization of identity formation to describe each phase of STEM integration. Findings indicate the importance of exploration through exposure to STEM material, mentorship, and diverse STEM communities. We generalize lessons from STEM interventions to URM students across institutions.
Keywords
Information
- Type
- Element
- Information
- Online ISBN: 9781108882071Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication: 26 November 2020
References
Alkhasawneh, R., & Hargraves, R. H. (2014). Developing a hybrid model to predict student first year retention in STEM disciplines using machine learning techniques. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 15(3), 35–42.Google Scholar
Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., & Lentz, E. (2006). Mentorship behaviors and mentorship quality associated with formal mentoring programs: Closing the gap between research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(3), 567–578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Allen-Ramdial, S. A. A., & Campbell, A. G. (2014). Reimagining the pipeline: Advancing STEM diversity, persistence, and success. BioScience, 64(7), 612–618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
American Institutes for Research. (2009) The road to the STEM professoriate for underrepresented minorities: A review of the literature. Washington, DC: American Institutes for Research.Google Scholar
Anderson, E., and Kim, D. (2006). Increasing the success of minority students in science and technology. Washington, DC: American Council on Education.Google Scholar
Andersen, L., & Ward, T. J. (2014). Expectancy‐value models for the STEM persistence plans of ninth‐grade, high‐ability students: A comparison between Black, Hispanic, and White students. Science Education, 98(2), 216–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armstrong, M. A., & Jovanovic, J. (2017). The intersectional matrix: Rethinking institutional change for URM women in STEM. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 10(3), 216–231.Google Scholar
Asgari, S., Dasgupta, N., & Cote, N. G. (2010). When does contact with successful ingroup members change self-stereotypes? A longitudinal study comparing the effect of quantity vs. quality of contact with successful individuals. Social Psychology, 41(3), 203–211.Google Scholar
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.Google Scholar
Ashley, M., Cooper, K. M., Cala, J. M., & Brownell, S. E. (2017). Building better bridges into STEM: A synthesis of 25 years of literature on STEM summer bridge programs. CBE Life Sciences Education, 16(4), es3.Google Scholar
Atherton, M. C. (2014). Academic preparedness of first-generation college students: Different perspectives. Journal of College Student Development, 55(8), 824–829.Google Scholar
Ballen, C. J., Wieman, C., Salehi, S., Searle, J. B., & Zamudio, K. R. (2017). Enhancing diversity in undergraduate science: Self-efficacy drives performance gains with active learning. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 16(4), 56.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497–529.Google Scholar
Beasley, M. A., & Fischer, M. J. (2012). Why they leave: The impact of stereotype threat on the attrition of women and minorities from science, math and engineering majors. Social Psychology of Education, 15(4), 427–448.Google Scholar
Berryman, S. E. (1983). Who will do science? Trends, and their causes in minority and female representation among holders of advanced degrees in science and mathematics. New York: Rockefeller Foundation.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, B., & Hansen, D. E. (2015). Implementing a summer STEM bridge program. Peer Review, 17(2), 19–20.Google Scholar
Bizumic, B., Reynolds, K. J., & Meyers, B. (2012). Predicting social identification over time: The role of group and personality factors. Personality and Individual Differences, 53(4), 453–458.Google Scholar
Bodenhausen, G. V. (2010). Diversity in the person, diversity in the group: Challenges of identity complexity for social perception and social interaction. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonous-Hammarth, M. (2000). Value congruence and organizational climates for undergraduate persistence. In Smart, J., Tierney, J. & W., W. G. (Eds.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research (pp. 339–370). New York Agathon Press.Google Scholar
Braddock, J. H., & McPartland, J. M. (1987). How minorities continue to be excluded from equal employment opportunities: Research on labor market and institutional barriers. Journal of Social Issues, 43(1), 5–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braxton, J. M. (1999). Theory elaboration and research and development: Toward a fuller understanding of college student retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 1(2), 93–97.Google Scholar
Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, M. B.(1999). The psychology of prejudice: Ingroup love and outgroup hate? Journal of Social Issues, 55(3), 429–444.Google Scholar
Brown, B. A., Henderson, J. B., Gray, S., Donovan, B., Sullivan, S., Patterson, A., & Waggstaff, W. (2016). From description to explanation: An empirical exploration of the African‐American pipeline problem in STEM. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 146–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruno, B. C., Wren, J. L., Noa, K., Wood-Charlson, E. M., Ayau, J., Soon, S. L., Needham, H., & Choy, C. A. (2016). Summer bridge program establishes nascent pipeline to expand and diversify Hawaii’s undergraduate geoscience enrollment. Oceanography, 29(2), 286–292.Google Scholar
Byars-Winston, A. M., Branchaw, J., Pfund, C., Leverett, P., & Newton, J. (2015). Culturally diverse undergraduate researchers’ academic outcomes and perceptions of their research mentoring relationships. International Journal of Science Education, 37(15), 2533–2554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byars-Winston, A., Estrada, Y., Howard, C., Davis, D., & Zalapa, J. (2010). Influence of social cognitive and ethnic variables on academic goals of underrepresented students in science and engineering: A multiple-groups analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 57(2), 205–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byars-Winston, A., Gutierrez, B., Topp, S., & Carnes, M. (2011). Integrating theory and practice to increase scientific workforce diversity: A framework for career development in graduate research training. CBE Life Sciences Education, 10, 357–367.Google Scholar
Bystydzienski, J. M., Eisenhart, M., & Bruning, M. (2015). High school is not too late: Developing girls’ interest and engagement in engineering careers. The Career Development Quarterly, 63(1), 88–95.Google Scholar
Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.Google Scholar
Carter, F. D., Mandell, M., & Maton, K. I. (2009). The influence of on-campus, academic year undergraduate research on STEM Ph. D. outcomes: Evidence from the Meyerhoff Scholarship Program. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 441–462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, M. J., Eagan, M. K., Lin, M. H., & Hurtado, S. (2011). Considering the impact of racial stigmas and science identity: Persistence among biomedical and behavioral science aspirants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(5), 564–596.Google Scholar
Chang, M. J., Sharkness, J., Hurtado, S., & Newman, C. B. (2014). What matters in college for retaining aspiring scientists and engineers from underrepresented racial groups. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(5), 555–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, C. C., Chin, D. B., Oppezzo, M. A., & Schwartz, D. L. (2009). Teachable agents and the protégé effect: Increasing the effort towards learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(4), 334–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chemers, M. M., Zurbriggen, E. L., Syed, M., Goza, B. K., & Bearman, S. (2011). The role of efficacy and identity in science career commitment among underrepresented minority students. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 469–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S., Binning, K. R., Manke, K. J., Brady, S., McGreevy, E. M., Betancur, L., Limeri, L. B., & Kaufmann, N. (2020). Am I a Science Person? A Strong Science Identity Bolsters Minority Students’ Sense of Belonging and Performance in College. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.Google Scholar
Chen, X., & Soldner, M. (2013). STEM attrition: College students’ paths into and out of STEM fields. Washington, DC: U.S Department of Education, IES National Center for Education Studies.Google Scholar
Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 49.Google Scholar
Cheryan, S., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kim, S. (2011). Classrooms matter: The design of virtual classrooms influences gender disparities in computer science classes. Computers & Education, 57(2), 1825–1835.Google Scholar
Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1065.Google Scholar
Choy, S. (2001). Essay: Students whose parents did not go to college: Postsecondary access, persistence, and attainment. In Wirt, J., et al. (Eds.), The condition of education 2001 (pp. XVIII–XLIII). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Government Printing Office.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chubin, D. E., & DePass, A. L. (2012). Understanding Interventions That Broaden Participation in Research Careers: Intervening to Critical Mass, vol. 5, Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.Google Scholar
Clewell, B. C., De Cohen, C. C., Tsui, L., Forcier, L., Gao, E., Young, N., Deterding, N., & West, C. (2006). Final report on the evaluation of the National Science Foundation Louis Stokes Alliances for Minority Participation Program. Washington, DC: Program for Evaluation and Equity Research (PEER), The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
Crocker, J., & Schwartz, I. (1985). Prejudice and ingroup favoritism in a minimal intergroup situation: Effects of self-esteem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11(4), 379–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasgupta, N. (2011). Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psychological Inquiry, 22(4), 231–246.Google Scholar
Dasgupta, N., & Stout, J. G. (2014). Girls and women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: STEMing the tide and broadening participation in STEM careers. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(1), 21–29.Google Scholar
Davidson, C., & Wilson, K. (2013). Reassessing Tint’s concepts of social and academic integration in student retention. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 15(3), 329–346.Google Scholar
Davis, C. S., St. John, E., Koch, D., & Meadows, G. (2010). Making academic progress: The University of Michigan STEM academy. Proceedings of the joint WEPAN/NAMEPA Conference, Baltimore, Maryland.Google Scholar
Deaux, K. (1994). Social identity. In Higgins, E.T. & Kruglenski, A.W. (Eds.), Social Psychology. Handbook of Basic Principles. (pp. 1–9). New York: The Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Deitch, E. A., Barsky, A., Butz, R. M., Chan, S., Brief, A. P., & Bradley, J. C. (2003). Subtle yet significant: The existence and impact of everyday racial discrimination in the workplace. Human Relations, 56(11), 1299–1324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dennehy, T. C., & Dasgupta, N. (2017). Female peer mentors early in college increase women’s positive academic experiences and retention in engineering. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(23), 5964–5969.Google Scholar
Duncombe, C., & Cassidy, M. (2016). Increasingly separate but unequal schools in U.S. and Virginia Schools. The Commonwealth Institute. 1–3.Google Scholar
Eaton, A. A., Saunders, J. F., Jacobson, R. K., & West, K. (2020). How gender and race stereotypes impact the advancement of scholars in STEM: Professors’ biased evaluations of physics and biology post-doctoral candidates. Sex Roles, 82(3–4), 127–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78–89.Google Scholar
Eccles, J. S., Midgley, C., Wigfield, A., Buchanan, C. M., Reuman, D., Flanagan, C. et al. (1993). Development during adolescence: The impact of stage–environment fit on young adolescents’ experiences in schools and in families. American Psychologist, 48, 90–101.Google Scholar
Espinosa, L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 209–241.Google Scholar
Estrada, M., Eppig, A., Flores, L., & Matsui, J. (2019). A longitudinal study of the biology scholars program: Maintaining student integration and intention to persist in science career pathways. Understanding Interventions, 10(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
Estrada, M., Hernandez, P. R., & Schultz, P. W. (2018). A longitudinal study of how quality mentorship and research experience integrate underrepresented minorities into STEM careers. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 17(1), ar9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., Hernandez, P. R., & Schultz, P. W. (2011). Toward a model of social influence that explains minority student integration into the scientific community. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 206–222.Google Scholar
Farrell, L., & McHugh, L. (2017). Examining gender-STEM bias among STEM and non-STEM students using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure (IRAP). Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 6(1), 80–90.Google Scholar
Farrell, L., & McHugh, L. (2020). Exploring the relationship between implicit and explicit gender-STEM bias and behavior among STEM students using the Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure. Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science, 15, 142–152.Google Scholar
Fassinger, R. E., & Asay, P. A. (2006). Career counseling for women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. Handbook of Career Counseling for Women, 2, 427–452.Google Scholar
Fayer, S., Lacey, A., & Watson, A. (2017). BLS spotlight on statistics: STEM occupations – past, present, and future. Washington, DC: US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor. www.bls.gov/spotlight/archive.htmGoogle Scholar
Fazio, R. H., & Zanna, M. P. (1981). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency. In Berkowitz, L., ed. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (vol. 14, pp. 161–202). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Findley–Van Nostrand, D., & Pollenz, R. S. (2017). Evaluating psychosocial mechanisms underlying STEM persistence in undergraduates: Evidence of impact from a six-day pre–college engagement STEM academy program. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 16(2), ar36.Google Scholar
Finkel, L. (2017). Walking the path together from high school to STEM majors and careers: Utilizing community engagement and a focus on teaching to increase opportunities for URM students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 26(1), 116–126.Google Scholar
Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142.Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company.Google Scholar
Foertsch, J., Alexander, B. B., & Penberthy, D. (2000). Summer research opportunity programs (SROPs) for minority undergraduates: A longitudinal study of program outcomes, 1986–1996. Council of Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 20(3), 114–119.Google Scholar
Foor, C. E., Walden, S. E., & Trytten, D. A. (2007). “I wish that I belonged more in this whole engineering group”: Achieving individual diversity. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(2), 103–115.Google Scholar
Freeman, T. M., Anderman, L. H., & Jensen, J. M. (2007). Sense of belonging in college freshmen at the classroom and campus levels. The Journal of Experimental Education, 75(3), 203–220.Google Scholar
Fries‐Britt, S. L., Younger, T. K., & Hall, W. D. (2010). Lessons from high‐achieving students of color in physics. New Directions for Institutional Research (148), 75–83.Google Scholar
Gasiewski, J. A., Eagan, M. K., Garcia, G. A., Hurtado, S., & Chang, M. J. (2012). From gatekeeping to engagement: A multicontextual, mixed method study of student academic engagement in introductory STEM courses. Research in Higher Education, 53(2), 229–261.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gates, A. (2019). The protégé effect in the retention of underrepresented minority undergraduate teaching assistants in geoscience: Preliminary indications from Newark, New Jersey. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(4), 417–426.Google Scholar
Gates, A. E., & Kalczynski, M. J. (2016). The oil game: Generating enthusiasm for geosciences in urban youth in Newark, NJ. Journal of Geoscience Education, 64(1), 17–23.Google Scholar
Gati, I., & Asher, I. (2001). Prescreening, in‐depth exploration, and choice: From decision theory to career counseling practice. The Career Development Quarterly, 50(2), 140–157.Google Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Payne, B. K. (Eds.). (2011). Handbook of implicit social cognition: Measurement, theory, and applications. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gilmer, T. (2007). An understanding of the improved grades, retention and graduation rates of STEM majors at the Academic Investment in Math and Science (AIMS) Program of Bowling Green State University (BGSU). Journal of STEM Education, 8 (1).Google Scholar
Graham, K. J., McIntee, E. J., Raigoza, A. F., Fazal, M. A., & Jakubowski, H. V. (2016). Activities in an S-STEM program to catalyze early entry into research. Journal of Chemical Education, 94(2), 177–182.Google Scholar
Graham, M. J., Frederick, J., Byars-Winston, A., Hunter, A. B., & Handelsman, J. (2013). Increasing persistence of college students in STEM. Science, 341(6153), 1455–1456.Google Scholar
Greenaway, K., Amiot, C. E., Louis, W. R., & Bentley, S. V. (2017). The role of psychological need satisfaction in promoting student identification. In Mavor, K. I., Platow, M. J., & Bizumic, B. (Eds.), Self and social identity in educational contexts (pp. 176–192). Abingdon: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.Google Scholar
Griffith, A. L. (2010). Persistence of women and minorities in STEM field majors: Is it the school that matters? Economics of Education Review, 29(6), 911–922.Google Scholar
Grossman, J. M., & Porche, M. V. (2014). Perceived gender and racial/ethnic barriers to STEM success. Urban Education, 49(6), 698–727.Google Scholar
Haeger, H., & Fresquez, C. (2016). Mentoring for inclusion: The impact of mentoring on undergraduate researchers in the sciences. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 15 (3), ar36.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C., & Price, T. F. (2013). What is approach motivation?. Emotion Review, 5(3), 291–295.Google Scholar
Hausmann, L. R., Schofield, J. W., & Woods, R. L. (2007). Sense of belonging as a predictor of intentions to persist among African American and White first-year college students. Research in Higher Education, 48(7), 803–839.Google Scholar
Hernandez, P. R., Schultz, P., Estrada, M., Woodcock, A., & Chance, R. C. (2013). Sustaining optimal motivation: A longitudinal analysis of interventions to broaden participation of underrepresented students in STEM. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 89.Google Scholar
Hernandez‐Matias, L., Pérez‐Donato, L., Román, P. L., Laureano‐Torres, F., Calzada‐Jorge, N., Mendoza, S., Washington, A. V., & Borrero, M. (2019). An exploratory study comparing students’ science identity perceptions derived from a hands‐on research and nonresearch‐based summer learning experience. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 48, 134–142.Google Scholar
Herrera, F. A., Hurtado, S., Garcia, G. A., & Gasiewski, J. (2012). A model for redefining STEM identity for talented STEM graduate students. Paper Presented at the American Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Vancouver, BC.Google Scholar
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 111–127.Google Scholar
Hogg, M. A., & Reid, S. A. (2006). Social identity, self-categorization, and the communication of group norms. Communication Theory, 16(1), 7–30.Google Scholar
Hulton, C. (2019). Using role models to increase diversity in STEM: The American workforce needs every capable STEM worker to keep America in a global leadership position. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 79(3), 16.Google Scholar
Hurtado, S., Cabrera, N. L., Lin, M. H., Arellano, L., & Espinosa, L. L. (2009). Diversifying science: Underrepresented student experiences in structured research programs. Research in Higher Education, 50(2), 189–214.Google Scholar
Hurtado, S., & Carter, D. F. (1997). Effects of college transition and perceptions of the campus racial climate on Latino college students’ sense of belonging. Sociology of Education, 70, 324–345.Google Scholar
Hurtado, S., Carter, D. F., & Spuler, A. (1996). Latino student transition to college: Assessing difficulties and factors in successful college adjustment. Research in Higher Education, 37(2), 135–157.Google Scholar
Hurtado, S., Eagan, M. K., Tran, M. C., Newman, C. B., Chang, M. J., & Velasco, P. (2011). We do science here: Underrepresented students’ interactions with faculty in different college contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 67, 553–579Google Scholar
Hurtado, S., Newman, C. B., Tran, M. C., & Chang, M. J. (2010). Improving the rate of success for underrepresented racial minorities in STEM fields: Insights from a national project. New Directions for Institutional Research, 2010(148), 5–15.Google Scholar
Inkelas, K. (2008). National study of living-learning programs: 2007 report of findings. College Park: University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Iyer, A., Jetten, J., Tsivrikos, D., Postmes, T., & Haslam, S. A. (2009). The more (and the more compatible) the merrier: Multiple group memberships and identity compatibility as predictors of adjustment after life transitions. British Journal of Social Psychology, 48(4), 707–733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jetten, J., Iyer, A., Tsivrikos, D., & Young, B. M. (2008). When is individual mobility costly? The role of economic and social identity factors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(5), 866–879.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, D. R. (2012). Campus racial climate perceptions and overall sense of belonging among racially diverse women in STEM majors. Journal of College Student Development, 53(2), 336–346.Google Scholar
Kamangar, F., Silver, G. B., Hohmann, C., Mehravaran, S., & Sheikhattari, P. (2019), Empowering Undergraduate Students to Lead Research: The ASCEND Program at Morgan State University. Broadening Participation in STEM (Diversity in Higher Education, Vol. 22), Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 35–53.Google Scholar
Kaplan, A., & Flum, H. (2010). Achievement goal orientations and identity formation styles. Educational Research Review, 5(1), 50–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellow, J. T., & Jones, B. D. (2008). The effects of stereotypes on the achievement gap: Reexamining the academic performance of African American high school students. Journal of Black Psychology, 34(1), 94–120.Google Scholar
Kelman, H. C. (2006). Interests, relationships, identities: Three central issues for individuals and groups in negotiating their social environment. Annual Review of Psychology, 57, 1–26.Google Scholar
Kim, A. Y., Sinatra, G. M., & Seyranian, V. (2018). Developing a STEM identity among young women: A social identity perspective. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 589–625.Google Scholar
Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work: Developmental relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.Google Scholar
Kuchynka, S., Findley-Van Nostrand, D., & Pollenz, R. S. (2019). Evaluating psychosocial mechanisms underlying STEM persistence in undergraduates: Scalability and longitudinal analysis of three cohorts from a six-day pre–college engagement STEM academy program. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 18 (3), ar41.Google Scholar
Kuchynka, S., Reifsteck, T., Gates, A., & Rivera, L. M. (2020). Mechanisms the promote science identity among underrepresented minority students: A longitudinal investigation. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Kuchynka, S. L., Salomon, K., Bosson, J. K., El-Hout, M., Kiebel, E., Cooperman, C., & Toomey, R. (2018). Hostile and benevolent sexism and college women’s STEM outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(1), 72–87.Google Scholar
Kunnen, E. S., Sappa, V., van Geert, P. L., & Bonica, L. (2008). The shapes of commitment development in emerging adulthood. Journal of Adult Development, 15 (3–4), 113–131.Google Scholar
Labov, J. B. (2004). From the National Academies: The challenges and opportunities for improving undergraduate science education through introductory courses. Cell Biology Education, 3(4), 212–214.Google Scholar
Lacy, K. (2015). Race, privilege and the growing class divide. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38(8), 1246–1249.Google Scholar
Lawner, E. K., Quinn, D. M., Camacho, G., Johnson, B. T., & Pan-Weisz, B. (2019). Ingroup role models and underrepresented students’ performance and interest in STEM: A meta-analysis of lab and field studies. Social Psychology of Education, 22(5), 1169–1195.Google Scholar
Lee, O., & Buxton, C. A. (2010). Diversity and equity in science education: Research, policy, and practice. Multicultural Education Series. Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Lee, O., & Luykx, A. (2006). Science education and student diversity: Synthesis and research agenda. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leach, C. W., Van Zomeren, M., Zebel, S., Vliek, M. L., Pennekamp, S. F., Doosje, B. Ouwerkerk, J., Spears, R. (2008). Group-level self-definition and self-investment: A hierarchical (multicomponent) model of in-group identification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 144–165.Google Scholar
Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 45(1), 79–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lent, R. W., Miller, M. J., Smith, P. E., Watford, B. A., Lim, R. H., & Hui, K. (2016). Social cognitive predictors of academic persistence and performance in engineering: Applicability across gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 94, 79–88.Google Scholar
Lewis, B. F. (2003). A critique of the literature on the underrepresentation of African Americans in science: Directions for future research. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 9, 361–373.Google Scholar
Lisberg, A., & Woods, B. (2018). Mentorship, mindset and learning strategies: An integrative approach to increasing underrepresented minority student retention in a STEM undergraduate program. Journal of STEM Education 19(3), 14–20.Google Scholar
Liu, S. (2018). Entering the STEM pipeline: Exploring the impacts of a summer bridge program on students’ readiness. Journal of College Student Development, 59(5), 635–640.Google Scholar
Luhtanen, R., & Crocker, J. (1992). A collective self-esteem scale: Self-evaluation of one’s social identity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(3), 302–318.Google Scholar
Luyckx, K., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Beyers, W. (2006). Unpacking commitment and exploration: Preliminary validation of an integrative model of late adolescent identity formation. Journal of Adolescence, 29(3), 361–378.Google Scholar
Luyckx, K., Schwartz, S. J., Berzonsky, M. D., Soenens, B., Vansteenkiste, M., Smits, I., & Goossens, L. (2008). Capturing ruminative exploration: Extending the four-dimensional model of identity formation in late adolescence. Journal of Research in Personality, 42(1), 58–82.Google Scholar
Luyckx, K., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., & Duriez, B. (2009). Basic need satisfaction and identity formation: Bridging self-determination theory and process-oriented identity research. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 56(2), 276–288.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. L., & Cairns, R. B. (1997). Do extracurricular activities protect against early school dropout?. Developmental Psychology, 33(2), 241–253.Google Scholar
Major, B., Spencer, S. J., Schmader, T., Wolfe, C., & Crocker, J. (1998). Coping with negative stereotypes about intellectual performance: The role of psychological disengagement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(1), 34–50.Google Scholar
Malik, J. A. N. (2014). STEM mentoring initiative moves forward. Mrs Bulletin, 39(8), 656–657. http://US2020.org.Google Scholar
Malone, K., & Barbino, G. (2009). Narrations of race in STEM research settings: Identity formation and its discontents. Science Education, 93(3), 485–510.Google Scholar
Maltese, A. V., & Tai, R. H. (2011). Pipeline persistence: Examining the association of educational experiences with earned degrees in STEM among US students. Science Education, 95(5), 877–907.Google Scholar
Mangu, D. M., Lee, A. R., Middleton, J. A., & Nelson, J. K. (2015, October). Motivational factors predicting STEM and engineering career intentions for high school students. IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) (pp. 1–8).Google Scholar
Marcia, J. E. (1994). Ego identity and object relations. In Masling, J. M. & Bornstein, R. F. (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on object relations theory (pp. 59–103). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2016). Computing whether she belongs: Stereotypes undermine girls’ interest and sense of belonging in computer science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(3), 424.Google Scholar
Maton, K. I., Beason, T. S., Godsay, S., Sto. Domingo, M. R., Bailey, T. C., Sun, S., & Hrabowski, F. A. (2016). Outcomes and processes in the Meyerhoff scholars program: STEM PhD completion, sense of community, perceived program benefit, science identity, and research self-efficacy. CBE –Life Sciences Education, 15 (3), ar48.Google Scholar
Maton, K. I., Hrabowski, F. A., & Ozdemir, M. (2007). Opening an African American STEM program to talented students of all races: Evaluation of the Meyerhoff Scholars Program, 1991–2005. In Orfield, G., Marin, P., Flores, S. M., & Garces, L. M. (Eds.), Charting the Future of College Affirmative Action: Legal Victories, Continuing Attacks, and New Research (pp. 125–156). Los Angeles, CA: The Civil Rights Project, UCLA.Google Scholar
Maton, K. I., Pollard, S. A., McDougall Weise, T. V., & Hrabowski, F. A. (2012). Meyerhoff Scholars Program: A strengths‐based, institution‐wide approach to increasing diversity in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine: A Journal of Translational and Personalized Medicine, 79(5), 610–623.Google Scholar
Matsui, J., Liu, R., & Kane, C. M. (2003). Evaluating a science diversity program at UC Berkeley: More questions than answers. Cell Biology Education, 2(2), 117–121.Google Scholar
May, G. S., & Chubin, D. E. (2003). A retrospective on undergraduate engineering success for underrepresented minority students. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 27–39.Google Scholar
McCarron, G. P., & Inkelas, K. K. (2006). The gap between educational aspirations and attainment for first-generation college students and the role of parental involvement. Journal of College Student Development, 47(5), 534–549.Google Scholar
McDonald, M. M., Zeigler-Hill, V., Vrabel, J. K., & Escobar, M. (2019). A single-item measure for assessing STEM identity. Frontiers in Education, 4, 78.Google Scholar
Meier, S. T., & Schmeck, R. R. (1985). The burned-out college student: A descriptive profile. Journal of College Student Personnel, 26, 63–69.Google Scholar
Mondisa, J. L., & McComb, S. A. (2015). Social community: A mechanism to explain the success of STEM minority mentoring programs. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(2), 149–163.Google Scholar
Morgenroth, T., Ryan, M. K., & Peters, K. (2015). The motivational theory of role modeling: How role models influence role aspirants’ goals. Review of General Psychology, 19(4), 465–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2007). Rising above the gathering storm: Energizing and employing America for a brighter economic future. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine(2019). The Science of Effective Mentorship in STEM. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council. (2011).Research training in the biomedical, behavioral, and clinical research sciences. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Science Board. (2015). Revisiting the STEM workforce, A companion to science and engineering indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation (2005). Broadening participation through a comprehensive, integrated system. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
National Science Foundation(2019). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering: 2019. National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics. Special Report NSF 19–304. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation.Google Scholar
Newell, D. C., Fletcher, S. L., & Anderson-Rowland, M. R. (2002). The women in applied science and engineering program: How diversified programming increases participation. American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 7, 1–9.Google Scholar
Oakes, J. (1990). Multiplying inequalities: The effects of race, social class, and tracking on opportunities to learn mathematics and science. Santa Monica, CA: The Rand Corporation (Report R-3928-NSF).Google Scholar
Olson, S., & Fagen, A. (2007). Understanding interventions that encourage minorities to pursue research careers: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Ong, M. (2005). Body projects of young women of color in physics: Intersections of gender, race, and science. Social Problems, 52(4), 593–617.Google Scholar
Osborne, J. W., & Jones, B. D. (2011). Identification with academics and motivation to achieve in school: How the structure of the self influences academic outcomes. Educational Psychology Review, 23(1), 131–158.Google Scholar
Ostrove, J. M., & Long, S. M. (2007). Social class and belonging: Implications for college adjustment. The Review of Higher Education, 30(4), 363–389.Google Scholar
Pascarella, E. T., & Terenzini, P. T. (1983). Predicting voluntary freshman year persistence/withdrawal behavior in a residential university: A path analytic validation of Tinto’s model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 215–226.Google Scholar
Pender, M., Marcotte, D. E., Domingo, M. R. S., & Maton, K. I. (2010). The STEM pipeline: The role of summer research experience in minority students’ Ph.D. aspirations. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 18(30), 1–36.Google Scholar
Perez, T., Cromley, J. G., & Kaplan, A. (2014). The role of identity development, values, and costs in college STEM retention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 315–329.Google Scholar
Persaud, A., & Freeman, A. L. (2005). Creating a successful model for minority students’ success in engineering: The PREF Summer Bridge Program. In 2005 Women in Engineering ProActive Network/National Association of Multicultural Engineering Program Advocates Joint Conference, held April 10–13, 2005, in Las Vegas, NV (pp. 1–7).Google Scholar
Pfund, C., Byars-Winston, A., Branchaw, J., Hurtado, S., & Eagan, K. (2016). Defining attributes and metrics of effective research mentoring relationships. AIDS and Behavior, 20(2), 238–248.Google Scholar
Phinney, J. S., Torres Campos, C. M., Padilla Kallemeyn, D. M., & Kim, C. (2011). Processes and outcomes of a mentoring program for Latino college freshmen. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 599–621.Google Scholar
Postmes, T., Baray, G., Haslam, S. A., Morton, T. A., & Swaab, R. I. (2006). The dynamics of personal and social identity formation. In Postmes, T. & Jetten, J. (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 215–236). London: Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446211946.n12Google Scholar
Pritchard, T. J., Perazzo, J. D., Holt, J. A., Fishback, B. P., McLaughlin, M., Bankston, K. D., & Glazer, G. (2016). Evaluation of a summer bridge: Critical component of the Leadership 2.0 Program. Journal of Nursing Education, 55(4), 196–202.Google Scholar
Purdie-Vaughns, V., & Eibach, R. P. (2008). Intersectional invisibility: The distinctive advantages and disadvantages of multiple subordinate-group identities. Sex Roles: A Journal of Research, 59 (5–6), 377–391.Google Scholar
Quitadamo, I. J., Brahler, C. J., & Crouch, G. J. (2009). Peer-led team learning: A prospective method for increasing critical thinking in undergraduate science courses. Science Educator, 18(1), 29–39.Google Scholar
Raelin, J. A., Bailey, M., Hamann, J., Pendleton, L., Reisberg, R., & Whitman, D. (2015). The role of work experience and self-efficacy in STEM student selection. Journal of Excellence in College Teaching, 26(4), 29–50.Google Scholar
Ragins, B. R. (2012). Mentoring. In Cameron, K. S. & Spreitzer, G. M. (Eds.), Oxford library of psychology. The Oxford handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 519–536). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ramsey, L. R., Betz, D. E., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2013). The effects of an academic environment intervention on science identification among women in STEM. Social Psychology of Education, 16(3), 377–397.Google Scholar
Rankin, S. R., & Reason, R. D. (2005). Differing perceptions: How students of color and white students perceive campus climate for underrepresented groups. Journal of College Student Development, 46(1), 43–61.Google Scholar
Reason, R. D. (2003). Student variables that predict retention: Recent research and new developments. Naspa Journal, 40(4), 172–191.Google Scholar
Rendón, L. I., Garcia, M., & Person, D. (2004). Transforming the first year of college for students of color. The First-Year Experience Monograph Series No. 38. National Resource Center for The First-Year Experience and Students in Transition. University of South Carolina, 1728 College Street, Columbia, SC 29208.Google Scholar
Renninger, K. A. (2009). Interest and identity development in instruction: An inductive model. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 105–118.Google Scholar
Reyes, M. A., Anderson-Rowland, M. R., & McCartney, M. A. (1999, November). Student success: What factors influence persistence? FIE’99 Frontiers in Education, 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No. 99CH37011 (Vol. 1, pp. 11A5-21).Google Scholar
Richard, O. C. (2000). Racial diversity, business strategy, and firm performance: A resource-based view. Academy of Management Journal, 43(2), 164–177.Google Scholar
Robbins, S. B., Allen, J., Casillas, A., Peterson, C. H., & Le, H. (2006). Unraveling the differential effects of motivational and skills, social, and self-management measures from traditional predictors of college outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 598–616.Google Scholar
Rogers, W. D., & Ford, R. (1997). Factors that affect student attitude toward biology. Bioscene, 23(2), 3–5.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, L., London, B., Levy, S. R., & Lobel, M. (2011). The roles of perceived identity compatibility and social support for women in a single-sex STEM program at a co-educational university. Sex Roles, 65 (9–10), 725–736.Google Scholar
Schwab, K., & Sala-i-Martín, X. (2012). The Global Competitiveness Report 2012–2013 of the World Economic Forum (full data edition). Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
Schwartz, S. J. (2001). The evolution of Eriksonian and neo-Eriksonian identity theory and research: A review and integration. Identity: An International Journal of Theory and Research, 1, 7–58.Google Scholar
Schweiger, D. M., & Denisi, A. S. (1991). Communication with employees following a merger: A longitudinal field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 110–135.Google Scholar
Seymour, E., & Hewitt, N. M. (1997). Talking about leaving: Why undergraduates leave the sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Shaw, E. J., & Barbuti, S. (2010). Patterns of persistence in intended college major with a focus on STEM majors. NACADA Journal, 30(2), 19–34.Google Scholar
Slovacek, S. P., Whittinghill, J. C., Tucker, S., Rath, K. A., Peterfreund, A. R., Kuehn, G. D., & Reinke, Y. G. (2011). Minority students severely underrepresented in science, technology, engineering, and math. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 12 (1).Google Scholar
Soldner, M., Rowan-Kenyon, H., Inkelas, K. K., Garvey, J., & Robbins, C. (2012). Supporting students’ intentions to persist in STEM disciplines: The role of living-learning programs among other social-cognitive factors. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(3), 311–336.Google Scholar
Spencer, S. J., Logel, C., & Davies, P. G. (2016). Stereotype threat. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 415–437.Google Scholar
Swim, J. K., Hyers, L. L., Cohen, L. L., Fitzgerald, D. C., & Bylsma, W. H. (2003). African American college students’ experiences with everyday racism: Characteristics of and responses to these incidents. Journal of Black Psychology, 29(1), 38–67.Google Scholar
Starr, C. R. (2018). “I’m not a science nerd!” STEM stereotypes, identity, and motivation among undergraduate women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(4), 489–503.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.Google Scholar
Stephen, J., Fraser, E., & Marcia, J. E. (1992). Moratorium-achievement (Mama) cycles in lifespan identity development: Value orientations and reasoning system correlates. Journal of Adolescence, 15(3), 283–300.Google Scholar
Stout, J. G., Dasgupta, N., Hunsinger, M., & McManus, M. A. (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate women’s self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(2), 255–270.Google Scholar
Strayhorn, T. L. (2011). Bridging the pipeline: Increasing underrepresented students’ preparation for college through a summer bridge program. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(2), 142–159.Google Scholar
Strayhorn, T. L.(2015). Reframing academic advising for student success: From advisor to cultural navigator. The Journal of the National Academic Advising Association, 35(1), 56–63.Google Scholar
Strayhorn, T. L.(2018). College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students. Routledge.Google Scholar
Swann, W. B., & Bosson, J. K. (2010). Self and identity. In Fiske, S. T., Gilbert, D. T., & Lindzey, G. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 589–628). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Syed, M., Azmitia, M., & Cooper, C. R. (2011). Identity and academic success among underrepresented ethnic minorities: An interdisciplinary review and integration. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 442–468.Google Scholar
Tai, R. H., Liu, C. Q., Maltese, A. V., & Fan, X. (2006). Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312, 1143–1144.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H. (1978). The achievement of intergroup differentiation. In Tajfel, H. (Ed.), Differentiation between social categories: Studies in social psychology (pp. 77–98). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H.(1981). Human groups and social categories: Studies in social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H.(1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33(1), 1–39.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In Austin, W. G. & Worchel, S. (Eds.), The social psychology of inter-group relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.Google Scholar
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C.(1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In Worchel, S., & Austin, W. G. (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, H., Crosby, F. J., & Gliner, M. D. (2001). Mentoring relationships in graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59(3), 326–341.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, L. S., Anderson, M. K., Jett, M., & Yourick, D. L. (2014). An innovative near-peer mentoring model for undergraduate and secondary students: STEM focus. Innovative Higher Education, 39(5), 375–385.Google Scholar
Tinto, V. (1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent re- search. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.Google Scholar
Tinto, V.(1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Tinto, V.(1988). Stages of student departure: Reflections on the longitudinal character of student leaving. Journal of Higher Education, 59, 438–455.Google Scholar
Tenenbaum, H., Crosby, F. J., & Gliner, M. D. (2001). Mentoring relationships in graduate school. Journal of Vocational Behavior 59 (3), 326–341.Google Scholar
Tomasko, D. L., Ridgway, J. S., Waller, R. J., & Olesik, S. V. (2016). Association of summer bridge program outcomes with STEM retention of targeted demographic groups. Journal of College Science Teaching, 45(4), 90–99.Google Scholar
Toven-Lindsey, B., Levis-Fitzgerald, M., Barber, P. H., & Hasson, T. (2015). Increasing persistence in undergraduate science majors: A model for institutional support of underrepresented students. CBE – Life Science Education, 14 (2), ar12.Google Scholar
Trujillo, G., Aguinaldo, P. G., Anderson, C., Bustamante, J., Gelsinger, D. R., Pastor, M. J. Wright, J., Márquez-Magaña, L., & Riggs, B. (2015). Near-peer STEM mentoring offers unexpected benefits for mentors from traditionally underrepresented backgrounds. Perspectives on Undergraduate Research and Mentoring: PURM, 4(1).Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Hogg, M. A., Oakes, P. J., Reicher, S. D., & Wetherell, M. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., Haslam, S. A., & McGarty, C. (1994). Self and collective: Cognition and social context. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 20(5), 454–463.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., & Reynolds, K. J. (2011). Self-categorization theory. Handbook of Theories in Social Psychology, 2(1), 399–417.Google Scholar
Turner, J. C., Reynolds, K. J., Haslam, S. A., & Veenstra, K. E. (2006). Reconceptualizing personality: Producing individuality by defining the personal self. In Postmes, T. & Jetten, J. (Eds.), Individuality and the group: Advances in social identity (pp. 11–36). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Tyson, W., Lee, R., Borman, K. M., & Hanson, M. A. (2007). Science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) pathways: High school science and math coursework and postsecondary degree attainment. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 12(3), 243–270.Google Scholar
Valsiner, J. (1992). Interest: A metatheoretical perspective. In Renninger, K.A., Hidi, S., & Krapp, A. (Eds.), The role of interest in learning and development (pp. 27–41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Van Leuvan, P. (2004). Young women’s science/mathematics career goals from seventh grade to high school graduation. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(5), 248–268.Google Scholar
Villarejo, M., Barlow, A. E., Kogan, D., Veazey, B. D., & Sweeney, J. K. (2008). Encouraging minority undergraduates to choose science careers: Career paths survey results. CBE – Life Sciences Education, 7(4), 394–409.Google Scholar
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92(1), 82–96.Google Scholar
Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L.(2011). A brief social-belonging intervention improves academic and health outcomes of minority students. Science, 331(6023), 1447–1451.Google Scholar
Wang, X. (2013). Why students choose STEM majors: Motivation, high school learning, and postsecondary context of support. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5), 1081–1121.Google Scholar
Watkins, J., & Mazur, E. (2013). Retaining students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) majors. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 36–41.Google Scholar
Wells, B., Sanchez, A., & Attridge, J. (2007). Modeling student interest in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. IEEE Summit. “Meeting the growing demand for engineers and their educators,” Munich, Germany.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. R., & Leaper, C. (2016). Bridging multidimensional models of ethnic–racial and gender identity among ethnically diverse emerging adults. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 45(8), 1614–1637.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. T., & Grigorian, S. (2019). The near-peer mathematical mentoring cycle: Studying the impact of outreach on high school students’ attitudes toward mathematics. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(1), 46–64.Google Scholar
Witkow, M. R., & Fuligni, A. J. (2011). Ethnic and generational differences in the relations between social support and academic achievement across the high school years. Journal of Social Issues, 67(3), 531–552.Google Scholar
Woodcock, A., Hernandez, P. R., Estrada, M., & Schultz, P. (2012). The consequences of chronic stereotype threat: Domain disidentification and abandonment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 635–646.Google Scholar
Yang, H. J. (2004). Factors affecting student burnout and academic achievement in multiple enrollment programs in Taiwan’s technical-vocational colleges. International Journal of Educational Development, 24, 283–301.Google Scholar
Young, J., Ortiz, N., & Young, J. (2017). STEMulating interest: A meta-analysis of the effects of out-of-school time on student STEM interest. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(1), 62–74.Google Scholar
Accessibility standard: Unknown
Why this information is here
This section outlines the accessibility features of this content - including support for screen readers, full keyboard navigation and high-contrast display options. This may not be relevant for you.Accessibility Information
Accessibility compliance for the HTML of this element is currently unknown
and may be updated in the future.
- 15
- Cited by